1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Sachliteratur, Reportagen, Biografien
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Charles the First," Jacob Abbott crafts a compelling narrative that weaves together the tumultuous life and reign of King Charles I of England. Through a blend of biographical storytelling and historical analysis, Abbott employs an accessible yet erudite literary style that caters to both scholarly readers and the general public. The book situates Charles I within the larger context of the English Civil War, emphasizing the ideological struggles that defined his reign and ultimately led to his execution. Abbott juxtaposes the king's personal virtues and political missteps while examining the societal forces that contributed to the monarchy's downfall. Jacob Abbott, a prolific 19th-century American author, was known for his engaging biographies aimed at younger readers. His educational background and interest in history likely influenced his desire to provide an insightful account of significant historical figures like Charles I. Abbott's nuanced portrayal reflects his belief in the importance of understanding history as a means to inform contemporary society, a concept driven by the pervasive tensions of his own era, marked by rapid change and ideological conflicts. I highly recommend "Charles the First" for anyone interested in the complexities of monarchical rule and the origins of modern democracy. Abbott's work not only serves as a captivating biography but also prompts readers to reflect on the broader implications of leadership and governance, making it a valuable addition to the libraries of history enthusiasts and students alike. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
Charles the First
Table of Contents
Introduction
A kingdom’s destiny hinges on the uneasy balance between a king’s conscience and the claims of his people. In Charles the First, Jacob Abbott presents a measured, narrative portrait of a monarch whose private convictions and public responsibilities collide amid the shifting ground of seventeenth-century Britain. The book establishes the pressures surrounding royal authority, the rising importance of representative institutions, and the complex ways in which personality, faith, and circumstance can shape political life. Abbott’s approach places readers near the centers of decision, while maintaining enough distance to illuminate patterns and causes that extend beyond any one episode or character.
This work is a historical biography set primarily in England and Scotland during the early and mid-seventeenth century, when the Stuart monarchy faced mounting constitutional and religious tensions. Published in the mid-nineteenth century as part of Abbott’s Makers of History series, it aligns with that collection’s aim to render major figures and turning points in accessible prose for general readers. The book’s perspective reflects its era: it is explanatory and orderly, attentive to cause-and-effect, and oriented toward moral reflection without polemics. Readers encounter not only a life story but also the social and institutional landscape that shapes and constrains a sovereign.
Abbott introduces Charles as a prince formed by courtly expectations, dynastic obligations, and the religious sensibilities of his time, then follows him to the throne and into widening circles of responsibility. The premise centers on how a ruler interprets duty under pressure: managing counsel, negotiating with Parliament, and responding to unrest at home and abroad. The narrative frames these developments as a series of increasingly consequential choices rather than isolated crises. Without presuming prior knowledge, Abbott sketches the background that makes those choices intelligible, inviting readers to consider how custom, law, and belief converge in the early chapters of a national confrontation.
Stylistically, the book is clear, chronological, and descriptive, favoring concise scenes and explanations over academic digression. Abbott pauses to clarify institutions, practices, and terms that might otherwise obscure the stakes, making the political conflicts legible to nonspecialists. The voice is formal but approachable, with a steady pace that balances incident and analysis. Character is treated as a force within history, yet not as the sole driver; structural pressures and the temper of the times stand beside individual temperament. The result is a narrative that blends biography with contextual history, offering a guided path through complex material without sacrificing coherence.
Themes of authority, legitimacy, and conscience anchor the book. Abbott examines how a monarch’s understanding of sacred duty interacts with the expectations of subjects and representatives, and how religious alignment can reinforce or erode political alliances. Questions of taxation, military necessity, and the administration of justice recur, showing the practical levers through which ideas become policy. The work also traces the role of counsel—friends, family, advisors—in shaping decisions that carry national consequences. Throughout, the tension between continuity and change is vivid: ancient prerogatives meet emergent claims of participation and accountability, and both sides appeal to tradition and right.
For contemporary readers, the biography’s relevance lies in its sober account of leadership under constraint. It engages enduring issues: how power is limited, how consensus is built or squandered, and how institutions respond when trust frays. Abbott’s emphasis on motives, perceptions, and misperceptions resonates with modern discussions about governance and public life, where intentions, procedures, and outcomes often diverge. By portraying conflict as an accumulation of choices set against structural realities, the book invites reflection on negotiation, compromise, and the risks of rigidity. It thus offers not only historical understanding but also a framework for thinking about present-day civic challenges.
Charles the First offers an experience that is instructive without pedantry and narrative without sensationalism, suitable for readers seeking a coherent entry point into the period. It rewards patient attention to context, showing how small shifts in policy or posture can recalibrate an entire political order. Abbott’s steady, explanatory tone cultivates reflection rather than verdicts, guiding readers through the early stages of a crisis with clarity and restraint. By the end, one understands how competing principles and pressures gather momentum, even before their ultimate resolution appears. The book’s enduring appeal lies in this careful mapping of causes, characters, and conditions at the threshold of upheaval.
Synopsis
Jacob Abbott's Charles the First is a compact biography in the Makers of History series, recounting the life and reign of England's Charles I from his childhood to his death. Written for general readers, it proceeds chronologically, explaining people, places, and institutions as they arise. Abbott situates Charles within the Stuart succession, the religious tensions of seventeenth-century Britain, and the evolving relationship between crown and Parliament. He emphasizes practical circumstances, family ties, and political necessities rather than abstract theory. The book aims to show how decisions accumulated into crises, tracing causes and effects that led from promising beginnings to national conflict and a dramatic conclusion.
The narrative opens with Charles's birth in Scotland, his frail health, and his position as the second son of James VI and I and Anne of Denmark. Abbott describes the royal household, tutors, and courtly expectations that shaped the prince's reserve and conscientious habits. When James inherited the English throne, the family relocated to London, bringing the young Charles into a larger political world. The text notes his gradual physical improvement, training in languages, arts, and religion, and his close bonds with his sister Elizabeth and brother Henry. Henry's early death altered the succession, making Charles heir apparent and refocusing court attention on him.
As Prince of Wales, Charles became central to dynastic diplomacy. Abbott recounts the proposed Spanish marriage, the influence of the ambassador Gondomar, and the dramatic journey of Charles and the favorite George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham, to Madrid. The failure of the Spanish Match redirected policy, fueling anti-Spanish sentiment and leading to alliance shifts. Charles's eventual marriage to the French princess Henrietta Maria framed future religious and political perceptions of his court. The book then marks the transition at James's death in 1625, as Charles ascended the throne, faced immediate fiscal needs, and relied heavily on Buckingham for counsel and management.
Early in the reign, domestic discontent converged with foreign setbacks. Abbott summarizes the ill-fated expeditions to Cadiz and La Rochelle, the strains of warfare, and Parliament's reluctance to grant supplies without redress of grievances. Impeachment proceedings against Buckingham heightened tensions; dissolutions followed. The Petition of Right emerged as a focal point, asserting protections against arbitrary taxation and imprisonment. Charles assented while continuing to collect disputed revenues such as tonnage and poundage. Religious questions, including rising Arminian influence and the role of Archbishop Laud, further alienated critics. The assassination of Buckingham removed one figure of controversy but did not resolve the underlying conflicts.
Abbott characterizes the subsequent Personal Rule as a period of orderly administration combined with contested policies. Without Parliament, Charles sought revenue through ship money, fines, and revived feudal dues, enforcing them via the Star Chamber and High Commission. The king and Laud promoted ceremonial uniformity, repairing churches and emphasizing hierarchy and discipline in worship. The narrative notes improvements in court culture and the arts alongside resentment at perceived innovations and constraints. Local government, monopolies, and the crown's assertion of prerogative are described in practical terms, setting the stage for a wider confrontation when resistance hardened beyond individual legal challenges.
The Scottish crisis forms a decisive turning point. Efforts to impose a new prayer book in Scotland provoked widespread opposition and the National Covenant, uniting religious and political resistance. Abbott outlines the Bishops' Wars that followed, highlighting logistical difficulties, limited resources, and the king's need for broader support. A short-lived Parliament in 1640 offered little aid and was quickly dismissed. Renewed conflict brought defeats and the occupation of northern English counties by Scottish forces, compelling the Treaty of Ripon and heavy payments. The financial and military pressures forced Charles to summon what became the Long Parliament, opening a new phase of contention.
With the Long Parliament assembled, accumulated grievances were addressed through rapid measures. Abbott details the arrests of Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, and Archbishop Laud; the complex proceedings against Strafford; and the bill of attainder that ended in his execution. Prerogative courts were abolished, forced loans denounced, and statutes such as the Triennial Act passed to secure regular parliaments. The Irish uprising of 1641 intensified fears and disputes over control of the army. The Grand Remonstrance cataloged complaints against royal government, deepening divisions among formerly allied reformers. The narrative tracks the mounting mistrust that edged political negotiation toward open rupture.
The breakdown reached a critical moment with the king's failed attempt to arrest five members in the Commons, after which he withdrew from London. Abbott follows the parallel mobilizations, as royalists and parliamentarians organized forces, negotiated alliances, and contested key towns. Major engagements, including Edgehill, Marston Moor, and Naseby, are treated succinctly, with attention to commanders such as Prince Rupert and the leaders of the New Model Army. The book emphasizes shifting fortunes, regional campaigns, and the cumulative effect of supply, discipline, and leadership. By the mid-1640s, parliamentary forces gained a decisive advantage, narrowing the king's options.
In the closing chapters, Abbott narrates the surrender of Charles to the Scots, his transfer to parliamentary custody, and the prolonged negotiations over settlement. The king's escape to the Isle of Wight and the renewal of fighting in a second civil war altered the balance within Parliament and the army. Pride's Purge cleared the way for a High Court of Justice, which tried and condemned the king. The account of the execution in 1649 is presented plainly, followed by reflections on the immediate aftermath. The book's overall message underscores how personal choices, institutions, and circumstance combined to reshape monarchy and nation.
Historical Context
Jacob Abbott’s Charles the First is set chiefly in the kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland during the early to mid-seventeenth century, a period defined by the Stuart monarchy’s struggle over sovereignty, religion, and finance. The narrative unfolds from Charles’s birth in 1600 and accession in 1625 through his execution in 1649, with London, Whitehall, Westminster, Oxford, Edinburgh, and Dublin as recurring centers. The wider European crisis of the Thirty Years’ War frames English policy. The book places readers in a composite realm where a common monarch governed distinct legal and ecclesiastical systems, and where conflicts over church uniformity, taxation, and parliamentary privilege converged into civil war and regicide.
Early reign crises shaped Charles’s rule. After the failed Spanish Match in 1623, he married Henrietta Maria of France in 1625, alarming Protestants. Wars against Spain and France followed: the failed Cadiz expedition of 1625 and the costly Île de Ré and La Rochelle operations of 1627 to 1628, overseen by George Villiers, Duke of Buckingham. Parliament, angered by losses and forced loans, pressed the Petition of Right in 1628, to which Charles assented under duress. Buckingham’s assassination at Portsmouth in August 1628 removed a lightning rod but not the grievances. Abbott connects these episodes to Charles’s personality, stressing his honor, reserve, and fatal attachment to prerogative amid financial weakness.
The Personal Rule of 1629 to 1640 saw governance without Parliament. Fiscal expedients included revived feudal dues, monopolies, and especially ship money, levied first on coastal counties in 1634 and extended kingdom wide in 1635. The Hampden case, decided narrowly in 1638, exposed legal limits of royal taxation. Ecclesiastically, Archbishop William Laud imposed ceremonial reforms after 1633, enforcing conformity via Star Chamber and High Commission. Abbott narrates these policies to illustrate how conscientious but rigid governance alienated elites and middling subjects alike. He emphasizes concrete mechanisms of authority—commissions, courts, proclamations—showing how administrative reach outpaced consent, setting the stage for resistance when revenue demands met religious anxieties.
The Scottish crisis began with the 1637 attempt to impose an English style prayer book in Edinburgh, provoking riots at St Giles and the National Covenant of 1638. Two Bishops’ Wars followed: the first in 1639 ended with the Treaty of Berwick, and the second in 1640 culminated in the Treaty of Ripon, after Scottish forces occupied Northumberland and Durham. Cash strapped, Charles summoned the Short Parliament in April 1640 and the Long Parliament in November 1640. Abbott presents the Covenanters as a decisive, organized movement that forced constitutional change, using these events to show how a misjudged religious policy in one kingdom unraveled royal authority across all three.
The Long Parliament (from November 3, 1640) dismantled instruments of prerogative: abolishing Star Chamber and High Commission, passing the Triennial Act (1641), and securing that Parliament could not be dissolved without its consent. Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, was attainted and executed on May 12, 1641; Archbishop Laud was imprisoned and later executed in 1645. The Irish Rebellion erupted in October 1641, sharpening disputes over control of the army. The Grand Remonstrance passed in November 1641, and on January 4, 1642, Charles’s attempt to arrest the Five Members failed. Raising his standard at Nottingham on August 22, 1642, he chose war. Abbott frames these moments as tragic escalations rooted in mutual fear and constitutional ambiguity.
The First English Civil War (1642 to 1646) featured shifting fortunes. Edgehill (October 23, 1642) was indecisive; First Newbury (September 1643) stalled royal momentum. Parliament’s alliance with Scotland (Solemn League and Covenant, 1643) helped secure Marston Moor (July 2, 1644), breaking royal power in the North. The Self Denying Ordinance (April 1645) and creation of the New Model Army under Sir Thomas Fairfax and Oliver Cromwell professionalized Parliament’s forces. Naseby (June 14, 1645) shattered the king’s main field army and exposed compromising correspondence. Oxford fell in June 1646. Abbott interweaves campaign narratives with portraits of command, highlighting Charles’s bravery yet strategic indecision and the institutional superiority of Parliament’s reformed military.
Between wars, the army and politicians debated sovereignty. The Putney Debates (1647) revealed radical ideas on representation, while Charles, after escaping Hampton Court, was held on the Isle of Wight. The Engagement with Scottish Engagers (December 1647) triggered the Second Civil War (1648): risings in Kent and Wales and the campaign at Preston (August 17 to 19, 1648) ended in Parliament’s favor. Pride’s Purge (December 6, 1648) removed moderates, and a High Court tried the king in January 1649. Charles I was executed outside the Banqueting House, Whitehall, on January 30, 1649. Abbott treats the trial and Eikon Basilike’s martyr image as potent symbols, probing how law, conscience, and force converged to end a monarchy.
Abbott’s account functions as a political and social critique by exposing the perils of unconstrained executive power, coerced taxation, and enforced religious uniformity in a composite monarchy. He underscores how opaque counsel, emergency finance, and politicized justice courted rebellion, while rigid parliamentary maximalism could also imperil settlement. The book highlights class and regional divides—court and city, gentry and commons, England and its Celtic peripheries—showing how contested legitimacy and military mobilization eroded civil order. By tracing the path from Petition of Right to regimented armies and a revolutionary tribunal, Abbott implicitly argues for transparent, consent based governance as the only durable remedy to seventeenth century crises.
King Charles I. Portrait by van Dyck.
Charles the First
PREFACE
THE history of the life of every individual who has, for any reason, attracted extensively the attention of mankind, has been written in a great variety of ways by a multitude of authors, and persons sometimes wonder why we should have so many different accounts of the same thing. The reason is, that each one of these accounts is intended for a different set of readers, who read with ideas and purposes widely dissimilar from each other. Among the twenty millions of people in the United States, there are perhaps two millions, between the ages of fifteen and twenty-five, who wish to become acquainted, in general, with the leading events in the history of the Old World, and of ancient times, but who, coming upon the stage in this land and at this period, have ideas and conceptions so widely different from those of other nations and of other times, that a mere republication of existing accounts is not what they require. The story must be told expressly for them. The things that are to be explained, the points that are to be brought out, the comparative degree of prominence to be given to the various particulars, will all be different, on account of the difference in the situation, the ideas, and the objects of these new readers, compared with those of the various other classes of readers which former authors have had in view. It is for this reason, and with this view, that the present series of historical narratives is presented to the public. The author, having had some opportunity to become acquainted with the position, the ideas, and the intellectual wants of those whom he addresses, presents the result of his labors to them, with the hope that it may be found successful in accomplishing its design.
The Tower of London. Engraving by Daniel Havell (1785-1826).
I. — CHARLES'S CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH
1600-1622
Born in Scotland.—The circumstance explained.—Princess Anne.—Royal marriages.—Getting married by proxy.—James thwarted.—Getting married by proxy[2].—James thwarted.—James in Copenhagen.—Charles's feeble infancy.—Death of Elizabeth.—Accession of James to the English crown.—Second sight[1].—Prediction fulfilled.—An explanation.—Charles's titles of nobility.—Charles's governess.—Windsor Castle.—Journey to London.—A mother's love.—Rejoicings.—Charles's continued feebleness.—His progress in learning.—Charles improves in health.—Death of his brother.—Charles's love of athletic sports.—Buckingham.—Buckingham's style of living.—Royalty.—True character of royalty.[1q]—The king and Buckingham.—Indecent correspondence.—Buckingham's pig.—James's petulance.—The story of Gib.—The king's frankness.—Glitter of royalty.—The appearance.—The reality.
KING CHARLES THE FIRST was born in Scotland. It may perhaps surprise the reader that an English king should be born in Scotland. The explanation is this:
They who have read the history of Mary Queen of Scots, will remember that it was the great end and aim of her life to unite the crowns of England and Scotland in her own family. Queen Elizabeth was then Queen of England. She lived and died unmarried. Queen Mary and a young man named Lord Darnley were the next heirs. It was uncertain which of the two had the strongest claim. To prevent a dispute, by uniting these claims, Mary made Darnley her husband. They had a son, who, after the death of his father and mother, was acknowledged to be the heir to the British throne, whenever Elizabeth's life should end. In the mean time he remained King of Scotland. His name was James. He married a princess of Denmark; and his child, who afterward was King Charles the First of England, was born before he left his native realm.
King Charles's mother was, as has been already said, a princess of Denmark. Her name was Anne. The circumstances of her marriage to King James were quite extraordinary, and attracted great attention at the time. It is, in some sense, a matter of principle among kings and queens, that they must only marry persons of royal rank, like themselves; and as they have very little opportunity of visiting each other, residing as they do in such distant capitals, they generally choose their consorts by the reports which come to them of the person and character of the different candidates. The choice, too, is very much influenced by political considerations, and is always more or less embarrassed by negotiations with other courts, whose ministers make objections to this or that alliance, on account of its supposed interference with some of their own political schemes.
