0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 0,00 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 0,00 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Musaicum Books
- Kategorie: Für Kinder und Jugendliche
- Sprache: Englisch
Jean Webster's novel, Daddy-Long-Legs, is an epistolary novel that follows the story of an orphan named Jerusha 'Judy' Abbott, who is sent to college by an anonymous benefactor known as Daddy-Long-Legs. Through a series of letters Judy writes to Daddy-Long-Legs, the novel explores themes of identity, independence, and social class. Webster's easy-to-read and engaging writing style makes this novel a timeless classic that appeals to readers of all ages. Set in the early 20th century, Daddy-Long-Legs offers a glimpse into the world of a young woman finding her place in society. Webster's use of humor and heartfelt moments adds depth to the narrative, making it a compelling read. Jean Webster, a pseudonym for Alice Jane Chandler Webster, was an American author and social activist who drew inspiration from her own experiences as an orphan and college student. Daddy-Long-Legs is considered her most popular work. I highly recommend Daddy-Long-Legs to readers interested in coming-of-age stories with a touch of romance and humor. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2022
Ähnliche
Daddy-Long-Legs
Published by
Books
Table of Contents
Introduction
At the heart of Daddy-Long-Legs lies the exhilarating and uneasy transformation of dependence into selfhood, as a young woman turns the conditions of an unseen benefactor’s aid into a habit of authorship, testing how gratitude can coexist with critique, how rules invite wit, how supervision can be met with candor, and how a constrained correspondence opens a space in which ambition, dignity, and joy flourish, so the distance between giver and receiver becomes not a wall but a field of negotiation where a mind learns to stand upright while acknowledging the hands that have lifted it.
Jean Webster’s Daddy-Long-Legs, first published in 1912, is an epistolary coming-of-age novel set in the United States in the early twentieth century. It follows an orphan sent to college by an anonymous patron, tracing her education, friendships, and first encounters with independence across semesters, vacations, and new social worlds. The book belongs to traditions of campus fiction and social comedy shaped by Progressive Era debates about philanthropy and women’s education. Its letter form blends immediacy and retrospection, placing readers inside a voice that matures on the page while retaining buoyant curiosity, observational humor, and a steady appetite for books and ideas.
The premise is simple and inviting: Jerusha Abbott, raised in a charitable home, receives unexpected support for a college education on the condition that she write monthly letters to her benefactor, who remains anonymous and declines to answer. Catching only the elongated shadow of his departing figure, she nicknames him Daddy-Long-Legs and proceeds to furnish him with a running account of classes, books, friendships, and small crises, soon preferring to be called Judy. The voice is sprightly, observant, and candid; the tone is hopeful without naïveté. Character and world unfold through style as much as incident, giving the narrative unusual lightness and depth.
Education is the novel’s central instrument of change, not merely a credential but a laboratory for ethics, confidence, and taste. Writing itself becomes a second education, as Judy learns to organize experience, argue with authority, and define what counts as success. The letters weigh the dignity of work against the comforts of patronage, illuminating the complicated gratitude that can accompany charity. Social class and gender expectations press in from every side, yet the book treats ambition and independence as forms of integrity rather than rebellion. Friendship, reading, and play gradually expand her world, softening the boundaries of origin without denying them.
For contemporary readers, the book’s questions feel strikingly current: Who gets access to education, and on whose terms? How should mentorship balance guidance and respect for autonomy? What does it mean to narrate your life for an audience that may not answer? In an age of emails, posts, and messages to largely silent readers, the epistolary form mirrors familiar modes of self-presentation and reflection. The novel’s emphasis on voice allows for genuine pluralism of feeling—delight, confusion, indignation, resolve—without retreating into cynicism, modeling how a person might grow publicly yet preserve a private center of judgment and care.
Webster sustains a lively rhythm that keeps sentiment nimble, moving from campus routines to wider travels with a brisk, essayistic charm. The diction is clear and playful; the comedy arises from perspective rather than antics; and brief sketches of everyday life accumulate into a persuasive portrait of maturing intelligence. The letters’ dates gently mark the academic year, giving the book a steady pulse of anticipation and renewal. Readers encounter a narrative that rewards close listening to tone and word choice, because much of the plot is carried in the shading of opinion, the recalibration of ideals, and the widening of sympathies.
Daddy-Long-Legs endures because it welcomes readers into the making of a mind, inviting us to witness growth not as a straight line but as a conversation with the world. It offers the pleasures of a campus novel, the intimacy of a private diary, and the social acuity of light satire, all within a spoiler-safe mystery that heightens attention to voice. Without disclosing later turns, it is enough to say that the book’s satisfactions come from earned insight rather than ornament. In a compact, humane form, it argues that education and imagination together can loosen the knots of circumstance.
Synopsis
Jean Webster’s Daddy-Long-Legs (1912) is an epistolary novel chronicling the education and self-discovery of Jerusha Abbott, a young woman raised in an orphanage. After a trustee reads a lively essay she has written, he decides to fund her college education on the condition that he remain anonymous and that she send him regular letters describing her progress. Allowed no replies and instructed never to seek his identity, she nicknames her unseen patron “Daddy-Long-Legs” after glimpsing his tall silhouette. The letters that follow trace her transition from institutional dependency toward a voice of her own, blending wit, candor, and social observation.
Arriving at a women’s college, Jerusha promptly shortens her name to Judy, a symbolic step toward self-reinvention. She encounters new disciplines, from literature to history, and discovers the exhilaration and strain of rigorous study. Her letters capture the contrast between the narrow routines of her upbringing and the diversity of college life. They also map her first intimate friendships, especially with the warm-hearted Sallie McBride and the sophisticated Julia Pendleton, whose social ease highlights Judy’s insecurities. Keenly aware of class differences and the etiquette she was never taught, Judy balances gratitude to her benefactor with an emerging insistence on dignity and self-respect.
Over successive terms, Judy’s letters chart a widening horizon. She discovers a vocation for writing, experimenting with essays and stories while absorbing contemporary authors in her coursework. Sent by her benefactor to spend summers at the rural farm of Lock Willow, she relishes the unhurried rhythm, the companionship of caretakers, and the freedom to reflect. The simplicity of country life, contrasted with the bustle of campus, sharpens her sense of independence and her attention to everyday detail. Her correspondence increasingly blends humor with thoughtful criticism, considering the purposes of education, the responsibilities that accompany privilege, and the possibilities open to women.
In this period Judy meets a worldly acquaintance through her college circle, Julia’s uncle Jervis Pendleton, whose visits to campus and to Lock Willow complicate her social education. Friendly yet discerning, he challenges her preconceptions and takes her opinions seriously, encouraging debate about art, work, and philanthropy. His attention highlights tensions already present in Judy’s situation: her life is financed by an unseen patron who forbids personal contact, yet her day-to-day growth depends on real conversation and choice. The letters record her attempts to reconcile gratitude with autonomy, as she considers how charity can uplift without constraining the recipient.
Judy’s developing social conscience keeps pace with her personal growth. Conscious of financial limitations and the gaps in her upbringing, she studies etiquette as carefully as literature and takes on small jobs during vacations to lessen her dependence. She experiments with publishing, sending out pieces that increasingly blend humor with insight. Her perspective on institutional childhood deepens as she considers reforms that might have nurtured individuality rather than conformity. At Lock Willow she finds space to weigh competing loyalties: to the benefactor who made college possible, to friends whose expectations vary, and to a vision of herself as a self-supporting writer.
As graduation approaches, the stakes of Judy’s choices intensify. The continued silence of her benefactor underscores both the generosity and the limits of their arrangement, and she grows determined to merit help without surrendering judgment. Opportunities and disappointments in her writing life arrive together, testing resilience as much as talent. Her circle of friends expands into potential suitors and patrons, and she navigates invitations that carry expectations. The letters become more introspective, weighing honesty against tact and obligation against freedom. Questions of identity—who she is, and who is entitled to guide her—move to the center of the narrative.
Without disclosing late revelations, the concluding letters bring Judy’s conflicts to a resolution that aligns emotional fulfillment with ethical independence. Daddy-Long-Legs endures for its lucid portrayal of education as a gateway to agency, its examination of the power imbalances embedded in benevolence, and its celebration of women’s intellect and wit. Webster’s use of the epistolary form renders character development immediate while capturing a progressive-era debate about charity, class, and opportunity. The novel’s blend of romance, social commentary, and comic observation continues to resonate, inviting readers to consider how generosity and respect can coexist in shaping a life.
Historical Context
“Daddy-Long-Legs” (1912) emerges from the United States’ Progressive Era, when reform-minded citizens scrutinized institutions and expanded women’s opportunities. Jean Webster sets her epistolary story in the northeastern U.S., moving between a nineteenth‑century orphanage and a modern women’s college modeled on schools like Vassar, which she herself attended. Letters function as both narrative device and period document, reflecting how personal correspondence structured education, philanthropy, and social life before telephones were commonplace in student life. The book’s premise—an orphan sent to college by a trustee—draws on contemporary practices of private charity and institutional oversight, providing a window onto class mobility debates circa 1900–1912.
In the decades before 1912, American child welfare shifted from custodial orphanages toward family-based care. The 1909 White House Conference on the Care of Dependent Children urged that children be raised in homes whenever possible, influencing public opinion and policy. The U.S. Children’s Bureau was created in 1912 to study and improve conditions for children. Earlier, Charity Organization Societies (founded in U.S. cities from 1877) promoted “scientific charity,” casework, and donor coordination; Mary E. Richmond’s “Friendly Visiting Among the Poor” (1899) codified practices. Webster’s fictional orphanage evokes an older model governed by trustees, against which Progressive critiques of institutionalization steadily mounted.
Women’s higher education had matured significantly by the early twentieth century. Vassar College (founded 1861), Smith (1871), Wellesley (1875), and Bryn Mawr (1885) offered rigorous liberal-arts curricula comparable to leading men’s colleges, while coeducation expanded at many state universities. Colleges introduced laboratories, libraries, and physical education programs as part of a holistic ideal. Admissions broadened for middle-class women, though access still reflected race and class inequities. By 1910, the “college woman” had become a recognizable social type, associated with intellectual ambition and civic engagement. Webster’s portrayal of lectures, dormitories, clubs, and student autonomy reflects this institutional landscape and its cultural meanings.
The novel speaks to Progressive Era reform currents led prominently by women. The settlement movement, exemplified by Jane Addams’s Hull House (founded 1889 in Chicago), emphasized education, cultural enrichment, and research-based social work. Women’s clubs organized reading, philanthropy, and civic projects through national federations. Simultaneously, the suffrage campaign accelerated: western states such as Washington (1910), California (1911), and Arizona, Kansas, and Oregon (1912) enfranchised women, expanding public roles for educated women. Against this backdrop, a young woman’s training for purposeful work and public responsibility appears timely, and the book’s attention to social service and institutional reform resonated with readers attuned to these movements.
Communication technologies and etiquette also frame the story. In 1912 American letter postage cost two cents per ounce, and Rural Free Delivery (initiated in 1896 and expanded nationwide thereafter) had made mail an everyday conduit for news, education, and accountability. College students routinely cultivated friendships and obligations through frequent letters and postcards; railroads enabled visits but at greater cost and time. Philanthropy often prized discretion, and some donors chose anonymity, while institutions kept formal records and reports for trustees. The novel’s one-sided correspondence, written to a benefactor, mirrors these practices, revealing how language, tone, and narrative self-fashioning shaped relationships across class and institutional boundaries.
Campus culture around 1900–1912 mixed tradition and innovation. Women’s colleges promoted debate societies, literary magazines, dramatics, and student government as training in leadership. Physical education grew, with organized exercise and sports; women’s basketball, for example, was adapted at Smith College in the 1890s under Senda Berenson’s guidance. Many campuses hosted chapters of the College Settlement Association (founded 1890), linking students to social work in nearby communities. Curricula emphasized English, history, languages, and emerging social sciences. Such environments cultivated the “New Woman” ideal—educated, independent, civic-minded—which informs the protagonist’s growth and ambitions, while also highlighting persistent expectations regarding propriety, class, and femininity.
Literarily, “Daddy-Long-Legs” belongs to a long tradition of epistolary narrative, from eighteenth‑century models to late‑Victorian hybrids like Bram Stoker’s “Dracula” (1897). The form allowed authors to dramatize self-education and social observation through an intimate voice. Early twentieth-century readers also knew popular “college girl” fiction cycles that celebrated campus life and character building. Published in 1912, Webster’s book quickly reached a wide audience and was adapted for the stage in 1914, confirming its topical appeal. Its wit and lightness coexist with pointed commentary on institutional charity, education, and taste, situating it within Progressive Era realism tempered by sentiment and humor.
The work ultimately reflects and critiques its era’s faith in uplift through education and rational reform. It affirms Progressive confidence in libraries, lectures, and disciplined study as routes to opportunity, while exposing paternalism in nineteenth‑century orphanages and in donor–recipient relationships. Its letters model a woman claiming intellectual and civic voice in a society broadening women’s public roles but still structured by class and gender hierarchies. By engaging child welfare debates, collegiate ideals, and philanthropic norms of 1900–1912, the novel captures the energies and contradictions of the Progressive Era, inviting readers to weigh benevolence against autonomy and institutional tradition against change.
Daddy-Long-Legs
‘Blue Wednesday’
The first Wednesday in every month was a Perfectly Awful Day—a day to be awaited with dread, endured with courage and forgotten with haste. Every floor must be spotless, every chair dustless, and every bed without a wrinkle. Ninety-seven squirming little orphans must be scrubbed and combed and buttoned into freshly starched ginghams[1]; and all ninety-seven reminded of their manners, and told to say, ‘Yes, sir’, ‘No, sir’, whenever a Trustee spoke.
It was a distressing time; and poor Jerusha Abbott, being the oldest orphan, had to bear the brunt of it. But this particular first Wednesday, like its predecessors, finally dragged itself to a close. Jerusha escaped from the pantry where she had been making sandwiches for the asylum’s guests, and turned upstairs to accomplish her regular work. Her special care was room F, where eleven little tots, from four to seven, occupied eleven little cots set in a row. Jerusha assembled her charges, straightened their rumpled frocks, wiped their noses, and started them in an orderly and willing line towards the dining-room to engage themselves for a blessed half hour with bread and milk and prune pudding.
Then she dropped down on the window seat and leaned throbbing temples against the cool glass. She had been on her feet since five that morning, doing everybody’s bidding, scolded and hurried by a nervous matron. Mrs. Lippett, behind the scenes, did not always maintain that calm and pompous dignity with which she faced an audience of Trustees and lady visitors. Jerusha gazed out across a broad stretch of frozen lawn, beyond the tall iron paling that marked the confines of the asylum, down undulating ridges sprinkled with country estates, to the spires of the village rising from the midst of bare trees.
The day was ended—quite successfully, so far as she knew. The Trustees and the visiting committee had made their rounds, and read their reports, and drunk their tea, and now were hurrying home to their own cheerful firesides, to forget their bothersome little charges for another month. Jerusha leaned forward watching with curiosity—and a touch of wistfulness—the stream of carriages and automobiles that rolled out of the asylum gates. In imagination she followed first one equipage, then another, to the big houses dotted along the hillside. She pictured herself in a fur coat and a velvet hat trimmed with feathers leaning back in the seat and nonchalantly murmuring ‘Home’ to the driver. But on the door-sill of her home the picture grew blurred.
Jerusha had an imagination—an imagination, Mrs. Lippett told her, that would get her into trouble if she didn’t take care—but keen as it was, it could not carry her beyond the front porch of the houses she would enter. Poor, eager, adventurous little Jerusha, in all her seventeen years, had never stepped inside an ordinary house; she could not picture the daily routine of those other human beings who carried on their lives undiscommoded by orphans.
Je-ru-sha Ab-bott
You are wan-ted
In the of-fice,
And I think you’d
Better hurry up!
Tommy Dillon, who had joined the choir, came singing up the stairs and down the corridor, his chant growing louder as he approached room F. Jerusha wrenched herself from the window and refaced the troubles of life.
‘Who wants me?’ she cut into Tommy’s chant with a note of sharp anxiety.
Mrs. Lippett in the office,
And I think she’s mad.
Ah-a-men!
Tommy piously intoned, but his accent was not entirely malicious. Even the most hardened little orphan felt sympathy for an erring sister who was summoned to the office to face an annoyed matron; and Tommy liked Jerusha even if she did sometimes jerk him by the arm and nearly scrub his nose off.
Jerusha went without comment, but with two parallel lines on her brow. What could have gone wrong, she wondered. Were the sandwiches not thin enough? Were there shells in the nut cakes? Had a lady visitor seen the hole in Susie Hawthorn’s stocking? Had—O horrors!—one of the cherubic little babes in her own room F ‘sauced’ a Trustee?
The long lower hall had not been lighted, and as she came downstairs, a last Trustee stood, on the point of departure, in the open door that led to the porte-cochere. Jerusha caught only a fleeting impression of the man—and the impression consisted entirely of tallness. He was waving his arm towards an automobile waiting in the curved drive. As it sprang into motion and approached, head on for an instant, the glaring headlights threw his shadow sharply against the wall inside. The shadow pictured grotesquely elongated legs and arms that ran along the floor and up the wall of the corridor. It looked, for all the world, like a huge, wavering daddy-long-legs[1q].
