1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Friends, though divided: A Tale of the Civil War," G. A. Henty crafts a thrilling narrative set against the backdrop of the American Civil War, focusing on themes of loyalty, honor, and the moral dilemmas faced by individuals during conflict. Henty employs a vivid, descriptive literary style, merging historical detail with engaging fictional characters to bring the tumultuous era to life. His narrative not only encapsulates the harsh realities of war but also delves into the personal struggles of divided loyalties, making a poignant commentary on human relationships in times of strife. The interplay between friendship and ideological divides adds depth to the story, reflecting the fractured state of a nation at war with itself. G. A. Henty, an English author and war correspondent, was deeply influenced by his experiences in various conflicts, which profoundly shaped his understanding of war's impact on individuals and society. His dedication to historical accuracy is evident in this work, as he seeks to impart knowledge of the past to younger generations. Henty's background in journalism also contributed to his ability to weave factual history with compelling storytelling, allowing him to convey the complexities of the Civil War era. "Friends, though divided" is highly recommended for readers interested in historical fiction that resonates with contemporary themes of division and reconciliation. Henty's ability to portray the human experience amidst chaos invites readers to reflect on their own values and connections, making this novel both an enriching and engaging read. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Ähnliche
Friends, though divided: A Tale of the Civil War
Table of Contents
Introduction
In Friends, though divided: A Tale of the Civil War, the bonds of youth are strained by rival allegiances as the demands of conscience, family, and country collide, asking whether fidelity to principle can coexist with fidelity to a friend when a nation itself is torn and every choice carries the weight of honor, survival, and identity, and suggesting that true courage may be found not only in the charge and the defense but in the quiet resolve to see the human face across the barricade even as drums beat, standards rise, and the familiar fields of home become lines of battle.
Written by G. A. Henty, a prolific Victorian author of historical adventures, this novel belongs to the genre of youth-oriented historical fiction and is set amid the English Civil War of the mid-seventeenth century, when Royalists and Parliamentarians contested power across England. First appearing in the late nineteenth century, it reflects the educational and moral priorities of its era, presenting history as both narrative and lesson. Readers can expect a story shaped by period research, brisk pacing, and clear moral framing, designed to immerse young audiences in a formative national conflict while encouraging reflection on character and duty.
At its core, the book follows two contemporaries whose affection predates the crisis, then diverges as households, local loyalties, and convictions draw them toward opposing banners. Without revealing later turns, the narrative traces their separate journeys through shifting front lines, garrison towns, and homes affected by requisition and rumor, juxtaposing their experiences and testing their resolve when paths cross or diverge. The storytelling favors clear, accessible prose and a steady, episodic structure, balancing movement with explanation. The mood is earnest rather than ironic, inviting readers to care about individual choices as much as the tides of a war that remakes ordinary life.
Themes develop through action rather than abstract debate: loyalty to family and patron, fidelity to conscience, reverence for law and tradition, pressures of command upon the young, and the aching cost of enmity among neighbors. The English Civil War context foregrounds questions of authority and liberty, worship and governance, yet the book continually returns to the intimate theatre where such grand words are tested, in dining rooms, village squares, billets, and on roads tracked by messengers. The title’s emphasis on divided friendship signals a sustained inquiry into whether respect can survive armed disagreement, and what it means to act honorably when every choice risks harm.
As is characteristic of Henty’s craft, the historical texture is conveyed through concrete detail: clothing, weapons, watchwords, and the rhythm of campaign life, interleaved with explanatory passages that orient readers unfamiliar with seventeenth-century institutions. Scenes of pursuit, siege, and escape punctuate quieter chapters of planning, service, and recovery, producing a readable alternation between risk and reflection. The narrative welcomes young readers without condescension, modeling decision-making under pressure and acknowledging consequences. While infused with the conventions and moral outlook of its Victorian moment, it offers a panorama wide enough to suggest complexity behind uniforms, mapping how large events press upon private commitments.
For contemporary audiences, the book’s central problem—affection contending with allegiance—speaks to an age of polarization in which communities and families often divide over principle and identity. Its pages invite questions relevant today: how to argue without contempt, how to weigh obedience against inner conviction, how to recognize dignity across difference. Readers may also engage critically with aspects that reflect the assumptions of its time, from gender roles to patriotic sentiment, using the novel as a springboard for discussion. In classrooms, book clubs, or solitary reading, it offers both narrative momentum and a framework for thinking about civility under strain.
Approached in this spirit, Friends, though divided: A Tale of the Civil War promises an experience that combines the pleasures of classic historical adventure with the seriousness of moral inquiry. It introduces a formative period of English history through the eyes of youth, renders conflict in vivid episodes rather than abstract lectures, and asks enduring questions about character when the world demands sides. Without foreclosing on outcomes, it prepares readers for trials of courage, moments of grace, and the contested space where friendship is tested yet not easily surrendered. The result is both a compelling story and a prompt to reflection.
Synopsis
G. A. Henty’s Friends, though divided: A Tale of the Civil War is set in England during the turbulent 1640s, when disputes over religion, taxation, and royal authority harden into open conflict. The story follows two boyhood companions from neighboring families who share skills in horsemanship and arms but differ in conviction and upbringing. One family leans toward the King and the Church of England; the other toward Parliament and stricter forms of worship. Henty introduces village life, household routines, and the influence of clergy and gentry, showing how national arguments filter into ordinary homes and shape the futures of the two friends.
As political crises deepen, petitions, protests, and royal proclamations divide towns and counties. The government’s measures and Parliament’s resistance stir militias, train-bands, and commissions that force households to declare allegiances. The two friends, urged by duty and family loyalty, choose opposite sides yet pledge to remain loyal to their personal bond. Henty depicts their preparations for service: drilling with pike and musket, practicing swordplay, and learning the chain of command. When armies begin to muster, the narrative carries them from quiet lanes into marching columns, where discipline, supply, and obedience replace the carefree independence of their youth.
The early campaigns introduce skirmishes, scouting rides, and the confusion of a first set-piece battle. Henty describes the clash of cavalry charges, the smoke of volleys, and the shock felt by new soldiers confronting wounds and loss. A major engagement like Edgehill is sketched to show the uncertainties of leadership and the difficulty of holding ground. The two friends, now officers’ aides or junior troopers, experience the war’s realities on opposite flanks. Their paths cross briefly under a flag of truce, reinforcing mutual respect even as loyalties pull them apart, and the story emphasizes prudence as much as bravery.
Between campaigns, the action shifts to city streets and council chambers. One protagonist serves as a messenger within London’s committees and guarded routes, where debates over pay, discipline, and religious settlement are fierce. The other rides to Oxford, the royal headquarters, carrying dispatches through patrols and watch-fires. Henty includes episodes of disguise, coded letters, and narrow escapes from arrest, using the cities’ gates, inns, and river crossings to frame suspense. The book outlines how sermons, pamphlets, and meetings shape policy, while commanders weigh uncertain intelligence, balancing popular unrest at home with the practical demands of supply and siege.
As the war widens, the narrative accompanies campaigns in the West and North, noting the contrasting styles of dashing cavalry leaders and disciplined troops. Figures such as Prince Rupert, Parliament’s generals, and rising officers gain brief, factual portraits. Henty highlights the importance of training and cohesion, especially as Parliament’s forces develop a more unified structure. A northern battle like Marston Moor signals a shift in momentum, and the emergence of a reformed army underscores the advantage of order over impetuous charge. Through marches, river crossings, and sieges, the friends’ duties expand, testing endurance as much as courage.
War’s burdens touch households and fields, and Henty makes room for the civilian cost: sequestered estates, empty granaries, and parishes split by conviction. The protagonists encounter refugees, prisoners, and wounded foes, and they learn the value of restraint. Small acts—securing safe conduct for a clergyman, arranging a prisoner exchange, or sparing a farm from foraging—illustrate a code of honor that survives amid hardship. Letters from home bring news of scarcity and fear, urging caution without dulling resolve. The story maintains a measured tone, showing how private loyalties and public duty are balanced, sometimes uneasily, by young officers on campaign.
Turning points arrive with decisive field actions and prolonged sieges that strain resources and morale. Battles like Naseby are evoked to show command decisions and the consequences of scattered reserves and captured baggage. Henty also notes political arguments within Parliament’s ranks and the growing influence of the army in shaping negotiations. The protagonists confront choices about obedience and conscience, weighing orders against personal judgment when civilians or former comrades are at risk. Their encounters remain marked by courtesy, avoiding needless bloodshed. The shifting fortunes of the war are presented as cumulative pressures rather than sudden reversals, tightening the story’s pace.
In the closing phases, the friends undertake missions that reflect a war moving toward resolution: securing strongholds, conveying terms, and guarding prisoners. Retreats and surrenders are depicted without dwelling on outcome, emphasizing fatigue, weather, and the steady erosion of supplies. Henty shows ruined villages, silent churches, and dispersed families as reminders of the conflict’s reach. The protagonists reckon with what they have seen and what remains of their youthful hopes. The narrative suggests possibilities of reconciliation and return to civil life, while keeping the eventual fates of individuals and institutions understated, allowing the historical backdrop to speak for itself.
Throughout, Friends, though divided presents a balanced tale of loyalty and restraint amid civil strife. Henty’s central message is that integrity and mutual respect can survive opposing convictions, and that courage includes mercy as well as valor. By following the friends through musters, councils, battles, and sieges in chronological order, the book offers young readers a accessible overview of the English Civil War’s causes and conduct. Without dwelling on conclusive outcomes, it emphasizes discipline, duty, and humanity. The synopsis reflects the novel’s intent: to instruct while entertaining, and to show how friendship endures even when a nation is torn.
Historical Context
Set during the English Civil Wars (1642–1651), the narrative unfolds across a patchwork of counties, garrison towns, and road networks that linked London with the shires. Royalist Oxford, Newark, Worcester, and Chester counterbalance Parliamentarian strongholds such as London, Hull, Plymouth, and Gloucester. The social landscape ranges from manor houses and market squares to parish churches and mustering greens, where gentry, merchants, yeomen, and artisans navigate allegiance and survival. Religious plurality—Anglican, Puritan, and Presbyterian—shapes community life and policy. Rivers like the Thames and Severn, and routes like the Great North Road, structure campaigning and news, turning a kingdom of parishes into a theater governed by councils, committees, and field commands.
Long-simmering conflicts between Crown and Parliament formed the war’s fuse. Charles I’s Personal Rule (1629–1640) relied on prerogative taxation such as Ship Money, tested in John Hampden’s 1637 case; Archbishop Laud’s reforms alienated Puritans; and failed attempts to impose the 1637 prayer book provoked the Bishops’ Wars (1639–1640) with Scotland. The Long Parliament (from November 1640) curtailed royal powers, passed the Triennial Act (1641), and issued the Grand Remonstrance (1641). After the Irish Rebellion of October 1641 and the king’s failed arrest of the Five Members (January 1642), Charles raised his standard at Nottingham on 22 August 1642. The novel opens amid these ruptures, dividing households and friendships along principle and necessity.
Initial campaigning in 1642–1643 was fluid and uncertain. The indecisive Battle of Edgehill on 23 October 1642 pitted the Earl of Essex’s Parliamentarians against the king’s army under Prince Rupert and the Earl of Lindsey; London was saved weeks later at Turnham Green (13 November). Charles made Oxford his wartime capital, while Parliament entrenched in Westminster and the City. 1643 saw regional struggles and sieges, notably at Gloucester (August–September), which Parliament relieved, and the costly First Battle of Newbury (20 September 1643). The book embeds its protagonists in this unsettled phase—billeting, requisitions, and shifting fronts—highlighting how quartered troops, garrisons, and foraging strained civilians and tested local loyalties.
The alliance of Parliament and the Scottish Covenanters under the Solemn League and Covenant (September 1643) reshaped the war. At Marston Moor near York on 2 July 1644, roughly 44,000 fought: Royalists under Prince Rupert and the Marquis of Newcastle against allied forces led by the Earl of Leven, Lord Fairfax, and the Earl of Manchester, with Oliver Cromwell commanding the disciplined Eastern Association horse. The Royalist defeat collapsed their northern position, leading to York’s capitulation. The narrative reflects this turning point by staging episodes around northern campaigning and by contrasting aristocratic dash with the steadier, godly cavalry ideal that would inform the Parliamentarian military revolution.
Parliament’s Self-Denying Ordinance (April 1645) enabled creation of the New Model Army under Sir Thomas Fairfax, with Oliver Cromwell as lieutenant-general of horse. Standardized pay, discipline, and organization concentrated force. On 14 June 1645 at Naseby in Northamptonshire, about 14,000 Parliamentarians defeated roughly 7,000–8,000 Royalists under King Charles and Prince Rupert. Casualties and captures crippled the king’s field army; his correspondence, seized and published as The King’s Cabinet Opened (1645), revealed appeals for Irish Catholic and foreign aid, eroding support. Subsequent victories at Langport (10 July 1645) and sieges reduced Royalist garrisons. The book mirrors this professionalization, contrasting early-war levies with drilled regiments that decide the conflict’s course.
Renewed risings in 1648—the Second Civil War—saw Royalist uprisings in Kent (Maidstone, 1 June), South Wales, and a Scottish invasion led by the Duke of Hamilton, defeated by Cromwell at Preston (17–19 August). Army–Parliament tensions culminated in Pride’s Purge (6 December 1648), when Colonel Thomas Pride excluded members to form the Rump Parliament. Charles I was tried for treason and executed outside the Banqueting House, Whitehall, on 30 January 1649. The Commonwealth replaced monarchy; army radicals and Leveller mutineers were suppressed at Burford (May 1649). The novel engages these crises through debates on sovereignty, conscience, and law, showing friends wrestling with justice versus expediency in the revolution’s starkest hour.
The wars broadened into the Three Kingdoms. Cromwell’s Irish campaign captured Drogheda (10 September 1649) and Wexford (11 October), inaugurating a harsh reconquest. In Scotland, he defeated Covenanter-Royalists at Dunbar (3 September 1650) and later smashed Charles II’s army at Worcester (3 September 1651), ending major fighting; the king fled into exile. The Commonwealth evolved into the Protectorate under the Instrument of Government (December 1653), with rule by Major-Generals (1655–1657). After Oliver Cromwell’s death (1658) and political drift, General George Monck enabled the Restoration: Charles II returned in May 1660 after the Declaration of Breda. The book’s closing movement gestures toward reconciliation, property restoration, and the difficult knitting of a torn polity.
By tracing two loyal, honorable youths on opposite sides, the narrative operates as a social and political critique of civil conflict. It exposes how committees of sequestration, forced loans, impressment, and free quarter punished the middling and poor; how Puritan ordinances closed theaters (1642), policed morals, and deepened confessional wounds; and how cavalier license imperiled noncombatants. It interrogates military ascendancy and the perils of ideological certainty, registering the trauma of regicide and the ambiguities of army rule. Without romanticizing either camp, the book elevates courage, restraint, and negotiated authority, implicitly advocating constitutional balance over zeal, and civic friendship over faction as remedies to seventeenth-century England’s fractures.
