0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Henrietta's Wish; Or, Domineering," Charlotte M. Yonge explores the intricate dynamics of personal relationships and societal expectations in Victorian England. The novel adeptly intertwines the themes of ambition and moral integrity, showcasing Yonge's characteristic prose that combines clarity with a rich, descriptive style. Set against the backdrop of a changing society, the narrative centers around the titular character, Henrietta, whose aspirations collide with the domineering influences of those around her. Yonge's keen observations of character development and moral dilemmas reflect her engagement with contemporary social issues, positioning the work as a critical commentary on female agency and the constraints imposed by family and society. Charlotte M. Yonge, a prolific Victorian novelist and a key figure in the 19th-century literary scene, utilized her writings to challenge societal norms and advocate for women's rights. Her background, steeped in a deeply religious and educational family, instilled in her a strong sense of morality and an awareness of the struggles women faced. This novel, like many of her works, illustrates her attempts to navigate and articulate the complexities of women's roles and their aspirations, providing insights that resonate beyond her time. Readers seeking an enriching exploration of character and society will find "Henrietta's Wish; Or, Domineering" a compelling and thought-provoking read. Yonge's nuanced portrayal of her characters invites reflection on the enduring themes of desire, control, and self-fulfillment, making this novel a significant contribution to feminist literature and an insightful dialogue on the intersection of personal and societal ambitions. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
Henrietta's Wish; Or, Domineering
Table of Contents
Introduction
A young woman’s ardor collides with the claims of conscience and community, testing where love ends and domination begins. Charlotte M. Yonge’s Henrietta’s Wish; Or, Domineering enters the domestic sphere to scrutinize power exercised in the name of care. With characteristic moral seriousness and emotional tact, Yonge examines how motives that feel pure to the actor can unsettle a household, and how affection can blur into authority. The novel’s quiet rooms, family conversations, and everyday duties become a stage on which character is refined, often not through spectacle but through steady self-examination, restraint, and the difficult art of listening as well as leading.
Henrietta’s Wish; Or, Domineering is a Victorian domestic novel set within an English family circle and first published in the mid-nineteenth century. Its author, Charlotte M. Yonge, was one of the era’s most widely read novelists, known for narratives that explore moral growth within home and community. This book belongs to the coming-of-age tradition, attentive to how young people learn to situate their impulses amid the claims of duty, kinship, and faith-colored ideals of service. The setting is intimate rather than panoramic, favoring parlors and gardens over public arenas, and it invites readers to attend to the nuances of tone, habit, and small decisions that accumulate into character.
The premise is straightforward yet potent: Henrietta, spirited and sincere, cherishes a wish that begins to shape the rhythms and expectations of those around her. Convinced by what she feels is right, and moved by love, she presses her will in ways that seem protective, even generous, to her own mind. The opening movement situates us among relatives and friends who know her best, and who respond to her influence with varying degrees of warmth, resistance, and concern. Yonge’s voice is clear and composed, preferring patient observation to melodrama, so that the reader experiences both Henrietta’s zeal and the subtle friction it can create.
Themes of authority, obedience, and self-command run through the narrative, asking how a person learns to guide without overruling, to serve without subsuming others. The subtitle highlights the danger of domineering—an exertion of strength that may begin in love but end in imbalance—while the primary title foregrounds desire and intention. Yonge probes the ethics of influence inside families, recognizing that affection confers power as surely as formal rank. The novel explores feminine agency within the constraints of its period, acknowledging capability and conviction while examining their rightful bounds. It values humility not as self-erasure but as the discipline that makes love trustworthy.
Stylistically, the book is measured and dialogic, its moral inquiry carried by conversation, domestic routine, and close attention to private motives. Yonge’s prose cultivates sympathy rather than shock; she allows tensions to ripen in ordinary scenes, so that choices feel both inevitable and open to grace. The narrative often juxtaposes temperaments—pliant and resolute, patient and impetuous—to expose the costs and consolations of each. Without sermonizing, the story invites readers to test arguments, watch for blind spots, and notice how small acts of deference or insistence can set a family’s course. Its realism is devotional in spirit, trusting that truth emerges in lived habit.
For contemporary readers, the book’s questions remain urgent: What distinguishes guidance from control? How do love and principle negotiate boundaries when people disagree about the good? Henrietta’s situation refracts modern concerns about leadership styles, emotional labor in families, and the ethics of persuasion. The narrative offers a reflective pace that rewards patience, making space to examine impulse, intention, and consequence before they harden into fate. Readers interested in character-driven fiction, in the moral psychology of influence, or in Victorian treatments of youth and responsibility will find the novel both resonant and probing. It treats growth as a sequence of practiced choices rather than sudden transformations.
Approached as an experience, Henrietta’s Wish; Or, Domineering offers quiet intensity, moral clarity without rigidity, and a steady companionship with a heroine whose very strengths must be schooled. It is for those who relish drawing-room drama where the stakes are relational and ethical, and where victories register in rebalanced affections as much as in dramatic turns. Without venturing beyond its initial setup, one can say the early chapters pose a simple yet searching proposition: desire must learn to listen. Yonge’s art lies in showing how such listening is learned, and why it matters—for the beloved as much as for the one who longs to love well.
Synopsis
Henrietta’s Wish; Or, Domineering begins in a quiet English household where a capable, affectionate daughter assumes early responsibilities. Henrietta is devoted to her widowed mother and beloved brother, and she is determined to preserve the familiar order that makes her feel safe. Her resolve grows into a guiding “wish” that the family’s choices, large and small, should align with her sense of right. The opening chapters establish the domestic setting, the family’s gentle piety, and Henrietta’s brisk efficiency. Subtle signs of overreach accompany her competence, suggesting that her eagerness to arrange matters may shade into insistence, especially when those she loves hesitate or differ.
Change soon presses on the household. Practical concerns about education, connections, and finances bring relatives and advisers into closer orbit, and their views do not always match Henrietta’s. She wants stability, believing that constancy will guard her family from sorrow and mistake. Yet proposals arise that would alter routines and redistribute authority. The narrative traces small negotiations: where the family will live, how the children will be educated, which duties belong to whom. Henrietta’s wish hardens into a plan for preserving the old ways. Her confidence wins admiration, but it also stirs quiet resistance, as others sense their preferences are being managed rather than heard.
A senior relative, acting with responsibility and affection, introduces firmer guidance. He outlines education for Henrietta’s brother, expects deference to experience, and suggests that household affairs require broader counsel. Henrietta meets this with quick arguments and a readiness to take on more work herself, convinced she can balance every demand. Conversations at meals, letters from friends, and visits to neighbors broaden the story’s social canvas while highlighting contested choices. The question is not whether Henrietta means well—she does—but how her purpose interacts with rightful authority. Early tensions remain cordial, yet each scene clarifies the difference between helpful leadership and controlling zeal.
The circle widens through excursions, parish events, and youthful gatherings that test Henrietta’s influence. She organizes charitable efforts, directs schedules, and anticipates difficulties, often correctly. A cousin or trusted friend provides a counterpoint, offering tactful feedback and, at times, quiet resistance. A minor mishap—arising less from malice than from assumptions—reveals how even benevolent plans can misfire when others are not partners. The episode does not undo Henrietta’s reputation for competence, but it alters how people speak around her. The narrative shows the polite evasions of those who feel managed, and it hints at consequences when guidance becomes a habit of command.
Attention then narrows to Henrietta’s brother, approaching crossroads in schooling and character. He admires his sister’s energy but wants room to decide for himself. Friends, mentors, and temptations present competing claims; small choices gain weight. Henrietta’s efforts to shield him sometimes press where trust would help more. A public embarrassment—modest in scale, serious in impression—illustrates what happens when decisions are steered from the outside. The brothers’ and sisters’ affection remains, yet the strain is felt across the home. The plot here emphasizes formation: how counsel should be given, when responsibility must be yielded, and where patience outlasts urgency.
Guides appear who model authority grounded in service: an experienced clergyman, an older friend, and a practical motherly figure. They neither dismiss Henrietta’s gifts nor excuse their sharper edges. Through parish work, quiet visits to the sick, and routine household care, they display steady influence that invites cooperation rather than compels it. Henrietta observes that steadfastness need not be loud, and that persuasion grows when it respects others’ burdens. The narrative lets daily scenes carry the lesson: thoughtful listening, shared tasks, and honest apologies. No single speech transforms her; instead, incremental insights gather weight, preparing for a decisive test.
A family crisis concentrates these lessons. An unforeseen event—touching health, duty, or a legal decision—requires prompt action, clear priorities, and trust among relations. Plans made in quiet must now work in difficulty. Henrietta is drawn to act decisively, yet she also recognizes where others have rightful charge. The chapter sequence quickens, binding domestic choices to moral questions about obedience, humility, and care. The turning point is not disclosed in advance, but the scenes leading to it show competing instincts: to command, to collaborate, to defer. What matters is how love is expressed under strain and whether affection yields control for the common good.
After the crisis, the household’s pattern subtly changes. Conversations become more candid, duties more evenly shared, and expectations more realistic. Henrietta’s wish is not abandoned; it is refined into a steady aim for peace rather than uniformity. Her brother’s path takes clearer shape, balancing guidance with responsibility. Relatives who once contended over particulars now agree on essentials, and even differences are handled with mutual respect. The narrative closes its remaining strands without spectacle, preferring the quiet satisfactions of ordinary life: consistent work, restored confidence, and unforced gratitude. The resolution keeps attention on character, not event, and on harmony rather than triumph.
Overall, the book traces how earnest affection can slide into domineering, and how genuine leadership grows from self-command, patience, and trust. It affirms the worth of family bonds, habitual duty, and faith-informed conscience, while warning against the kind of zeal that forgets others’ agency. Without startling revelations, the story builds through small decisions that carry moral weight. By the end, Henrietta’s wish has changed meaning: from preserving control to fostering unity. The synopsis avoids final specifics, but the theme is clear. True influence in a household comes through service and sympathy, not insistence, and steadfast love works best when it gives others room.
Historical Context
Charlotte M. Yonge’s Henrietta’s Wish; Or, Domineering (published 1853) is set in contemporary mid-Victorian England, within the rhythms of genteel provincial life. The story’s domestic focus assumes a recognizable landscape of parish villages and small market or seaside towns in the south of England, shaped by Anglican worship, visiting of the poor, and kin-based households. Though fictionalized, the milieu resembles Yonge’s Hampshire surroundings near Winchester and Southampton, where clergy-led communities and family networks governed conduct. The temporal setting—roughly the 1840s–early 1850s—coincides with accelerating industrial changes, railway expansion, and reform debates that subtly press upon the novel’s themes of obedience, duty, and the moral education of the young.
The Oxford Movement is the most formative context for Yonge’s fiction. It is commonly dated from John Keble’s “Assize Sermon” on National Apostasy, preached at St Mary’s, Oxford, on 14 July 1833. Tracts for the Times (1833–1841), authored by John Henry Newman, Edward Bouverie Pusey, Keble, and others, urged a recovery of apostolic order, sacramental devotion, and the Church of England’s continuity with the early Church. The controversy culminated in Newman’s Tract 90 (1841) and his reception into the Roman Catholic Church in 1845; Pusey’s suspension in 1843 further intensified public debate. On the ground, Tractarianism promoted daily services, catechesis, reverent ritual, charitable societies, and church restoration (fostered by the Cambridge Camden Society, founded 1839). Keble, vicar of Hursley from 1836 until his death in 1866, was Yonge’s mentor; she lived in nearby Otterbourne, Hampshire, and absorbed his ideals of obedience, vocation, and sanctification of ordinary life. These dates and figures matter because the movement redirected Anglican piety from mere respectability toward disciplined holiness within parish and family. Henrietta’s Wish mirrors that ethic: its conflicts over authority and “domineering” self-will are framed as moral questions answerable to rightful superiors, conscience shaped by Church teaching, and the duties of kinship and parish. The novel’s emphasis on filial deference, truthful speech, self-command, and service to the vulnerable recasts home life as a training ground for Christian character—an explicitly Tractarian conviction. Even where public controversies never appear on the page, the practices they inspired—regular worship, organized almsgiving, and the serious catechizing of children—orient the plot’s moral horizon and the characters’ choices, marking the work as a direct cultural offspring of the 1833–1845 High Church revival.
Rapid transport and industrial display framed the decade of the novel’s publication. By 1850 Britain had laid over 6,000 miles of railway; the London–Southampton line opened in 1840, bringing provincial towns into tighter orbit with the metropolis and ports. The Great Exhibition of 1851 in Hyde Park, London, drew more than six million visitors to Joseph Paxton’s Crystal Palace, symbolizing imperial reach, mechanized production, and middle-class progress. Such developments shifted family mobility, leisure, and social horizons. In the novel’s world, however, Yonge quietly resists the cult of novelty: movement between town and country is weighed against stability, and the glamour of improvement is judged by its effects on duty, charity, and domestic order.
Public health crises and sanitary reform shaped mid-century domestic experience. The second cholera pandemic struck Britain in 1848–1849, causing tens of thousands of deaths; a further outbreak in 1853–1854 prompted intensified inquiry. The Public Health Act of 1848 established a General Board of Health (with Edwin Chadwick’s influence), encouraging sewers, clean water, and urban drainage; John Snow’s 1854 investigation at the Broad Street pump in London advanced contagion theory. Within Anglican parishes, women’s visiting societies and nursing efforts became practical responses. Yonge’s households operate under this climate: sickrooms, convalescence, and disciplined routines offer moral education, and charity is measured by steady service to the ill and poor rather than spectacular gestures.
Debates over women’s education and work formed another vital backdrop. Queen’s College, London, founded in 1848 (with F. D. Maurice among its early leaders), and Bedford College (1849, established by Elizabeth Jesser Reid) professionalized female study; the Governesses’ Benevolent Institution (1843) addressed a precarious occupation for middle-class women. From 1851 Yonge edited The Monthly Packet for girls, promoting serious instruction within Anglican frameworks. Henrietta’s Wish reflects these currents by scrutinizing the formation of female character: the tension between willfulness and self-command, public usefulness and domestic vocation. Its critique of “domineering” impulses aligns with contemporary efforts to channel growing educational opportunities toward humility, responsibility, and sustained, parish-centered service.
Victorian family law and guardianship norms shape the novel’s conflicts about authority. Under coverture, a married woman’s legal identity merged with her husband’s; property and decision-making were constrained until later reforms. The Wills Act 1837 standardized testamentary formalities, while the Custody of Infants Act 1839—won through Caroline Norton’s campaign—granted limited maternal custody rights in separation. The Court of Chancery supervised minors’ property and appointments of guardians. Such frameworks created households where uncles, aunts, or appointed guardians wielded real power over juveniles. The novel’s negotiations of obedience, prudence, and the boundaries of youthful influence unfold within this legal matrix, testing how moral authority should be exercised as well as received.
The Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 reorganized relief through union workhouses, aiming to deter outdoor aid and reduce local rates. Its implementation in the 1830s–1840s often provoked controversy as families faced institutional relief and stricter eligibility. In many rural and small-town settings, clergy and gentlewomen formed visiting societies, clothing clubs, and savings schemes to mitigate hardship and preserve dignity outside the workhouse. These concrete practices appear as the ethical weather of Yonge’s fiction: charity is structured, regular, and relational. Henrietta’s Wish uses parish engagements—instruction, almsgiving, and oversight—to test characters’ motives, contrasting impulsive benevolence with accountable stewardship shaped by the Church’s calendar and communal discipline.
As a social critique, the book interrogates the mid-Victorian celebration of autonomy, improvement, and display by exposing their moral costs within family and parish. It challenges class complacency through sustained attention to visiting, instruction, and the discipline of charity under the shadow of Poor Law austerity and sanitary peril. It critiques unjust or careless authority by insisting that guardianship be exercised as service, not domination; and it checks youthful self-assertion when it ignores communal obligations. In a period marked by railways, exhibitions, and reform, the novel calls for holiness, steadiness, and accountable power, insisting that genuine progress be measured by obedience, compassion, and social responsibility.
