1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Historic Doubts on the Life and Reign of King Richard the Third," Horace Walpole embarks on a meticulous investigation into the controversial life of one of England's most enigmatic monarchs. Through a blend of meticulous historical analysis and a literary style rich in Gothic sensibilities, Walpole challenges the established narratives surrounding Richard III, particularly the portrayal of him as a tyrant and murderer. The book exemplifies the burgeoning interest in historical inquiry during the 18th century, weaving together a narrative that is as much about the politics of memory as it is about the life of Richard himself. Walpole, an influential figure of the Gothic revival and the author of the seminal "The Castle of Otranto," melds his keen historical insight with his passion for storytelling. His upbringing in the politically charged atmosphere of his time may have influenced his desire to reassess historical narratives, particularly regarding monarchs vilified by history. As a member of the Whig party, Walpole's exploration of Richard III reflects broader themes of power, reputation, and legitimacy that echo through the corridors of English political history. This book is highly recommended for scholars, historians, and casual readers alike, as it invites critical reflection on the reliability of historical accounts and the construction of identities. Walpole's work not only enriches our understanding of Richard III but also serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in interpreting history. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
Historic Doubts on the Life and Reign of King Richard the Third
Table of Contents
Introduction
This book confronts a centuries-old villain with the cool light of evidence. Horace Walpole’s Historic Doubts on the Life and Reign of King Richard the Third enters the crowded chamber of legend, rumor, and theatrical flourish, and asks a deceptively simple question: what do we really know? In place of inherited certainties, it supplies patiently sifted records, measured inference, and a skepticism honed by Enlightenment habits of mind. Rather than replacing one myth with another, Walpole steadies the reader’s gaze on sources themselves, urging attention to bias, chronology, and context as the surest guides through the tangled story of a much-disputed reign.
Its classic status rests on more than notoriety. Historic Doubts is a landmark of eighteenth-century historical criticism, an early, durable example of how literary poise and archival diligence can unsettle entrenched reputations. By challenging a narrative canonized by chroniclers and amplified by the stage, it helped demarcate the boundary between artful representation and verifiable history. The book’s influence lingers in the way later writers and historians reconsider official stories, contest inherited villainies, and test tradition against documents. As a work of prose, it models clarity and tact; as a work of scholarship, it exemplifies method over melodrama, and argument over assertion.
Horace Walpole, a prominent man of letters and devoted antiquarian, published Historic Doubts in 1768. Writing in an age animated by inquiry and the weighing of testimony, he applied the tools of the Enlightenment to one of England’s most controversial monarchs. The book examines the life and short reign of Richard III within the wider turbulence of late fifteenth-century politics. Walpole’s stated aim is not to crown a new hero but to dismantle easy certainties, chiefly by testing the credibility of sources that had shaped Richard’s reputation. He probes what contemporaries wrote, what they omitted, and what their positions might have made them prefer.
The contents are not a conventional narrative but a sustained interrogation. Walpole surveys chronicles, parliamentary materials, and related records, scrutinizing their dates, dependencies, and motives. He queries how rumors harden into history, how repetition confers authority, and how retrospective judgments serve victors. He revisits episodes that had been treated as settled, not to sensationalize them, but to ask what the evidence allows. Throughout, he juxtaposes competing testimonies, seeking congruence where possible and exposing contradiction where necessary. The book thus becomes an exercise in disciplined doubt: an invitation to suspend inherited verdicts until the balance of proof has been weighed with care.
Walpole’s skepticism is historically situated. Tudor-era accounts—shaped by the needs of a new dynasty and by the political climates in which they were composed—loom large over Richard’s image. Historic Doubts does not ignore these sources; it interrogates their provenance, incentives, and method. In doing so, Walpole explores how power structures, patronage, and hindsight can distort even conscientious writers. He also acknowledges the role of drama and popular retellings in turning nuance into caricature. The book thereby links literary culture and historical memory, showing how eloquence can amplify bias, and how readers must navigate between rhetorical force and documentary solidity.
A central achievement of the book is its methodical handling of evidence. Walpole compares accounts for internal consistency, tests plausibility against known timelines, and notes where an author’s vantage point might color judgment. He cross-references statutes, records, and chronicle entries, treating each item not as definitive in itself but as part of a cumulative case. The approach anticipates later standards of source criticism: distinguishing hearsay from testimony, supposition from inference, and assertion from proof. By modeling how to read historically—attentive to omission as much as to inclusion—Historic Doubts enlarges its subject from one monarch’s reputation to the craft of history-writing itself.
The prose contributes to its endurance. Walpole writes with urbane restraint and pointed civility, avoiding invective while sustaining pressure on weak arguments. He makes room for ambiguity without collapsing into indecision, guiding readers through dense materials with a steady hand. The tone is at once courteous and uncompromising, skeptical yet never flippant. Rather than dazzling with novelty, he persuades through accumulation, careful distinctions, and a lucid sequence of questions. This composure allows the book to act as a tutorial in reasoning as much as an intervention in a specific controversy, presenting historical debate as a discipline of patience and proportion.
Considered as a classic, the book’s impact lies in opening a space where reputations may be reconsidered without polemic. It helped inaugurate a tradition of re-evaluating figures long overshadowed by victorious narratives. The questions it makes routine—who is speaking, under what constraints, with what evidence—have become common property among historians and historically minded novelists alike. Readers and scholars who later formed more organized reevaluations of Richard’s character found in Walpole an early, articulate precedent for measured dissent. Its afterlife, therefore, includes both scholarly practice and popular debate about the ethics of remembrance and the responsibilities of historical representation.
Historic Doubts also clarifies themes that extend beyond any one king. It illuminates the manufacture of reputation, the politics of succession, and the uneasy commerce between legality and power. It probes how narratives are constructed from fragments, how silence can be tactical, and how the pressures of regime change produce histories that double as manifestos. It explores the tension between public documents and private motives, and it shows how every source bears the trace of circumstance. To read the book is to confront the perennial contest between narrative convenience and factual complexity, a contest that underlies much of historical and literary culture.
For contemporary readers, the book’s relevance is unmistakable. At a time when information circulates quickly and authority is contested, Walpole’s patient habits—checking provenance, testing claims, distinguishing suspicion from proof—constitute an ethical toolkit. His example encourages skepticism without cynicism: a readiness to question received stories while accepting the limits of what can be known. The work thus resonates as a case study in critical reading, applicable to archives and headlines alike. It also offers a meditation on how art influences memory, reminding us that powerful portrayals require equally powerful scrutiny if truth is to retain its footing.
The experience of reading Historic Doubts is quietly exhilarating. It unfolds as a scholarly investigation with the cadence of a judicial inquiry, inviting the reader to become a juror rather than a spectator. Each section advances by weighing claims, isolating assumptions, and recalibrating confidence as evidence accrues. Far from diminishing interest in its subject, this method heightens it, because uncertainty becomes a stimulus to further thought rather than a pretext for resignation. By the end, the reader is equipped not with a slogan but with a framework—an intellectual posture that prizes fairness, proportionality, and the courage to revise settled opinions.
In sum, Horace Walpole’s examination of Richard III endures because it marries elegant prose to disciplined doubt, turning a controversial reign into a lesson in how history is made. Its themes—bias, memory, authority, and the labor of verification—remain vital. As literature, it refines the art of argument; as history, it demonstrates the care evidence demands. The book’s lasting appeal lies in its invitation to read rigorously and judge modestly, to recognize both the power and the limits of narrative. That invitation, once extended to a king long past, continues to engage readers who seek clarity amid the turbulence of received truths.
Synopsis
Horace Walpole’s Historic Doubts on the Life and Reign of King Richard the Third sets out to reexamine Richard III’s character and actions through the strict testing of evidence. Walpole proposes neither to vindicate nor to condemn, but to question received narratives established under Tudor influence. He adopts a quasi-legal method, weighing testimony, chronology, and public records against later anecdotes. The book’s central aim is to challenge the certainty with which Richard’s crimes have been asserted, especially those surrounding the princes in the Tower. Walpole frames the inquiry as a corrective to historical prejudice, calling for caution where sources are partial, hostile, or secondhand.
Walpole first scrutinizes the primary storytellers of Richard’s life: Thomas More, Polydore Vergil, and the chroniclers Hall and Holinshed. He identifies inconsistencies, hearsay, and political incentives shaping their accounts, noting how Tudor patronage and retrospective composition may have colored narratives. The book distinguishes between contemporaneous documentary evidence and literary histories written decades later. Walpole emphasizes the value of official acts, grants, proclamations, and parliamentary records, arguing that these more stable sources often contradict or complicate dramatic tales. He highlights factual disagreements among authorities on dates, motives, and physical descriptions, encouraging readers to suspend judgment where corroboration is weak or absent.
To set context, Walpole recounts the Wars of the Roses and Edward IV’s troubled reign, focusing on factionalism stemming from Edward’s marriage to Elizabeth Woodville. He sketches Richard, Duke of Gloucester, as a northern magnate entrusted with significant commands, whose local governance earned administrative credit within Yorkist circles. This background explains the rivalries that shaped events upon Edward’s death. Walpole uses contemporary perceptions of Richard’s conduct during his brother’s lifetime to question the sudden transformation into villain alleged by later writers. The overview of power blocs, especially the Woodville affinity versus established nobility, frames the subsequent struggle over the royal minority.
The narrative then follows the crisis of 1483 after Edward IV’s death. The Woodvilles sought to control the young Edward V and the regency. Richard, allied with the Duke of Buckingham, intercepted the royal party, arrested Earl Rivers and associates at Stony Stratford, and conducted the prince to London. Walpole examines council proceedings that invested Richard with the protectorship, noting that such actions, while forceful, observed certain constitutional forms. He analyzes the custody of the second prince, the reorganization of the court, and the tensions within the council, presenting the protectorate as a contested but procedurally grounded arrangement rather than an immediate, naked usurpation.
Turning to the execution of Lord Hastings, Walpole dissects the abrupt events of June 1483. He contrasts the vivid narrative of a sudden accusation and instant beheading with the scarcity of corroborating official records. Questioning elements such as the alleged withered arm and the portrayal of conspiracies, he notes chronological and testimonial discrepancies among sources. Walpole pays close attention to the difference between summary punishment and parliamentary condemnation, and he tests claims about Jane Shore’s influence against documentary evidence. The overall treatment neither excuses the violence nor accepts the standard story wholesale, inviting doubt where the evidence appears contradictory or derived from later embellishment.
Walpole next analyzes Richard’s title to the crown. The core issue is the precontract of marriage between Edward IV and Lady Eleanor Butler, reportedly revealed by Bishop Stillington, which rendered Edward’s later marriage invalid and his children illegitimate. He details the sequence from consultation to public proclamation and the parliamentary act known as Titulus Regius. Emphasizing the formal, recorded character of these steps, Walpole contrasts them with depictions of covert seizure. He notes Henry VII’s later repeal and destruction of copies of the act, suggesting how evidence might have been suppressed. The discussion stays centered on legality and procedure rather than moral absolutes.
The fate of the princes in the Tower receives extended, cautious treatment. Walpole reviews rumors, the unfinished account by Thomas More, and later confessions attributed to Sir James Tyrrell, observing the lack of contemporary judicial proceedings or definitive proof. He evaluates the timing of reports, foreign correspondence, and silence in official English records. The book presents the hypothesis that the Duke of Buckingham, not Richard, may have had motive and opportunity, but Walpole stops short of certainty. The key conclusion is not an alternative indictment but an insistence that the most grievous charge against Richard rests on late, unverified, and often contradictory testimonies.
Walpole surveys Richard’s short reign for evidence of character in action. He notes parliamentary measures against forced benevolences, reforms regarding bail and juries, encouragement of trade, and efforts to publish statutes in English. The suppression of Buckingham’s rebellion, campaigns in the north, and relations with Scotland and Brittany are presented from available records, with attention to administrative normality rather than systematic tyranny. Walpole also revisits claims about Queen Anne Neville’s death, finding no substantiation for poisoning. The emphasis falls on public acts and civic interactions, used to illustrate that Richard’s governance, as documented, does not align neatly with the most sensational depictions.
The closing sections recount Richard’s defeat and death at Bosworth and the consolidation of Tudor rule. Walpole addresses the repeal of Titulus Regius and the promotion of hostile narratives under Henry VII, tracing how official policy and courtly writers shaped posterity’s view. He argues that the destruction or neglect of inconvenient records magnified later stories into accepted truths. The book ends by counseling historical restraint: where sources are compromised or inconsistent, doubt is preferable to confident accusation. Its overall message is a call for evidence-based history, urging readers to distinguish between authenticated documents and tradition hardened into unquestioned belief.
Historical Context
Horace Walpole’s inquiry is set against the late fifteenth-century English polity, the years surrounding 1483–1485 when Richard, Duke of Gloucester, became King Richard III. The milieu is the urban and courtly world of London—especially Westminster and the Tower—balanced by the magnate-dominated shires of the North and Midlands, including York, Middleham, and Leicester. The crown’s authority depended on personal allegiance, feudal affinities, and household service, with law administered through royal council, chancery, and local justices. The setting includes prominent strongholds such as the Tower of London, where pivotal custodial decisions occurred, and key battlefields like Bosworth Field in Leicestershire, where the conflict that defines Richard’s reign reached its violent resolution.
Institutionally, the setting is a monarchy still recovering from the Wars of the Roses, reliant on great noble houses—the Nevilles, Woodvilles, Stanleys, and Percies—whose private armies and regional influence shaped national outcomes. London’s mercantile prosperity and the recent introduction of printing by William Caxton (1476) fostered record keeping and polemical circulation, while common law procedures coexisted with summary royal justice. The royal household and council chambers were spaces where policy, patronage, and conspiracy intertwined. This environment produced a dense paper trail—statutes, proclamations, parliamentary rolls—that Walpole scrutinized to test Tudor-era narratives about Richard. The time and place thus comprise a document-rich but faction-riven realm, ideal for a source-critical reassessment.
The Wars of the Roses (1455–1487) form the long backdrop, pitting the houses of Lancaster and York for control of the crown. Major turning points included First St Albans (1455), Towton (1461), Barnet (14 April 1471), and Tewkesbury (4 May 1471), where Yorkist supremacy under Edward IV was secured and the Lancastrian heir eliminated. Richard, as Duke of Gloucester, earned military and administrative reputation in the North during this period. Walpole situates Richard within this conflict, arguing that longstanding civil strife, not innate villainy, explains many actions later moralized by Tudor writers. He treats the war’s factional logic as essential context for interpreting events of 1483–1485.
Edward IV’s secret marriage to Elizabeth Woodville in 1464 upset magnate politics, alienating Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick, and elevating the Woodville kin network. Warwick’s revolt (1469–1470), the brief readeption of Henry VI (1470–1471), and Edward’s restoration through Barnet and Tewkesbury sharpened divisions. The death of Henry VI in the Tower on 21 May 1471 darkened royal reputation and later informed suspicions about princely deaths. Walpole underscores the Woodville ascendancy’s polarizing impact and the attendant culture of rumor and retaliation. He suggests the antagonisms generated by Edward’s marriage and Warwick’s displacement set the stage for contested custody of heirs and competing claims to legal legitimacy in 1483.
On 9 April 1483, Edward IV died, leaving his twelve-year-old son Edward V under the tutelage of Woodville relatives. The prince’s journey from Ludlow to London was intercepted at Stony Stratford (30 April 1483) by Richard, Duke of Gloucester, and the Duke of Buckingham; Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers, Richard Grey, and Thomas Vaughan were arrested. Edward V entered London and was lodged in the Tower, the customary site for pre-coronation residence. Walpole emphasizes how routine ceremonial practice was later recast as sinister, and he probes conflicting chronicle accounts of the arrests, treating them as products of factional interests rather than neutral reportage.
The swift execution of Lord Hastings on 13 June 1483 in the Tower council chamber is a focal event. Accused of plotting with Queen Elizabeth’s kin and allied churchmen such as John Morton, Hastings was summarily beheaded the same day, without formal trial. Contemporary and near-contemporary sources disagree on the immediacy and evidence for treason. Walpole interrogates these discrepancies, arguing that even harsh political justice must be weighed against the period’s norms of emergency governance. He notes Hastings’s Yorkist service and the plausibility of a court split, using council dynamics, dates, and depositions to contest later Tudor dramatizations of the scene as proof of Richard’s premeditated tyranny.
The shift from protectorate to kingship culminated in June–July 1483. A sermon by Dr. Ralph Shaa on 22 June advanced the claim that Edward IV’s marriage to Elizabeth Woodville was invalid due to a precontract with Lady Eleanor Butler. On 26 June, Richard accepted the crown; his coronation was held on 6 July 1483. Parliament’s statute known as Titulus Regius (1484) ratified the claims of bastardy and Richard’s right. Walpole foregrounds these legal instruments—sermon, parliamentary act, and proclamations—to argue that a public, if contested, juridical process existed, later erased by Henry VII’s repeal and ordered destruction of Titulus Regius, itself a key fact in Walpole’s critique.
Buckingham’s Rebellion in October 1483 represented the first major uprising against Richard III. Coordinated risings in the South and West, backed by exiled Yorkists and Lancastrians, sought either to place Henry Tudor on the throne or to restore Edward V. Severe flooding impeded communications; Henry failed to land effectively; the rebellion collapsed. Henry Stafford, Duke of Buckingham—once Richard’s ally—was captured and executed at Salisbury on 2 November 1483. Walpole scrutinizes motives and timing, noting Buckingham’s shifting loyalties and suggesting alternative hypotheses for culpability in the princes’ fate. He uses the rebellion’s breadth to illustrate how rapidly anti-Ricardian narratives gained political utility.
