Looking for a world formula? ALL + Nothing found! E-Book

Rolf Brinkmann

• Herausgeber: novum publishing
• Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 204

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024

Beschreibung

Many scientists have already searched for a world formula. After countless conjectures, various theories were discussed and ultimately dropped again. Time and again, well-founded, complex considerations have been made, but so far everything has led nowhere. While the universe is familiar to everyone, the same cannot be said for the void. The author wants to change this and show what no one before him has dealt with in this way: "This is my universe. With this, I have solved the oldest and greatest of all questions... Perhaps my work will also give rise to interesting lines of thought and a new perspective on everything." Embark on a journey into the depths of nothingness and far beyond!

Leseprobe

The book

NICHTS - The book

The book for EVERYTHING

Nothing moves and works without nothing!

Nothing is the greatest, the smallest

and everything in between.

Nothing has not existed since sometime,

but always.

We will never have the technical possibilities

to find out how far, or close

it is. In other words: the biggest or the smallest to

ing. Only our brain is capable of doing this.

A book needs an easily digestible recipe so that the

reading can be digested more pleasantly.

A book that is not fun to read should only be

then read it if it helps you.

Rolf Brinkmann

Foreword

Many have already searched for a world formula or the world formula. Many assumptions have been made, many theories discussed and abandoned. Complicated and complex considerations have been made, but so far everything has come to nothing.

I had never looked for it and yet, or perhaps precisely because of that, I succeeded!

What if the solution was simpler?

The answer: it's actually easier than many people think.

But that should not be the case and will hardly find any support.

The result was, as the second title line says: ALL + NOTHING found. Everyone knows about the universe. Nothingness, however, is as good as unknown until now.

I would like to change that and, as far as I know, no one before me has treated it in this intensive way, if at all.

You are probably holding the most unusual and spectacular book you will ever read. So find out what it's all about and have fun reading it.

Please note: It will contain "inaccuracies", my spelling is certainly not perfect and because everything is changeable, not everything has to be as described. There will be occasional repetitions for better understanding. But you will have a lot of fun. And remember, this is the first edition. Errors will be corrected in later editions. In this limited edition, the proofreaders only made one correction. Commercially incomprehensible, but I think I still managed to do it reasonably well, even without a second proofreading service. But a first edition can be enormously valuable, precisely because of the errors it contains.

Back in 2017, I realized about the world formula and nothingness. But I waited. Since, to my knowledge, nothing had been published anywhere until 2022, I assumed that no one would have found a solution by then. If someone had found out in the meantime, they would hardly have missed the opportunity to announce it. There would be plenty of reasons for this: pride, vanity, making history, profit - the whole psychological spectrum. Hardly anyone can resist this inner compulsion to share.

It was still necessary to provide evidence that was comprehensible and scientifically repeatable at all times - with the same result every time.

I chose a different approach and it was surprisingly easy for me. However, this inevitably required correcting or even eliminating some old theories and absolutely free thinking.

Scientific evidence and theories do not always have to be correct in their entirety. Often one part is correct, another part requires corrections or additions. Still other parts can be completely refuted. And then there are the proofs and theories that come and go.

I answer these and other questions by including many topics that often appear to be unrelated. In the end, it becomes clear what the connections are. Because you have purchased this book, you should also receive as much added value as possible. It expands your knowledge enormously and can protect you from many things. It is actually enough for your entire philosophy of life. Others are only needed for professional advancement or entertainment.

Conclusions are drawn from the logical connections. I also include hypothetical and speculative elements; these will be stated separately in each case or can be seen from the wording.

As a rule, science is always speculative. Its repeatability, as required, is only possible to a limited extent. The eternal changes do not allow for exact repetition.

Unfortunately, I have to make the following criticism of the scientists.

Their established elites, guided by their convictions, power and income, do not tolerate other opinions. Contempt is the least they experience. And if power, religion, church, politics or capital don't like it, they don't shy away from annihilation. At least in the past.

This begs the question: Who determines what is scientifically recognized or not? Answer: They themselves and those who capitalize on it. I doubt whether this is always progressive and positive for nature and people.

On the other hand, scientists mainly conduct research in sub-areas and are unable to deal with the overall picture. This often results in so-called tunnel vision. Of course, you have to give them credit for this.

I have created a largely comprehensive work in which I have included many individual areas. However, it is certainly not complete or perfect. I don't want to be arrogant enough to claim that and it is my personal view.

On my own behalf: I am not a masterful writer. The text of this work will be a little bumpy. A professional will certainly be able to do it more fluently. At my age, I won't learn how to do that any more and who knows how long I have left. But it's not a novel whose text should be easy to read. This is first and foremost about imparting knowledge. Even if I have made it very unusual and entertaining and fun. It's the best I can do and I think it's better to admit it here. It's always more likeable than trying to be perfect. But it's the first edition and, because it's not perfect, it will become incredibly valuable over the years. Grab more and give them away.

Because everything is constantly changing, my findings are also subject to these changes and are therefore not necessarily the final conclusion - except for the answer to the question: Is there a world formula? It is always irrefutably valid! I provide the proof with this work, and I have also added my own opinion to one or two things. But without the arrogance to say that this is the case and will always remain so. Everything is in a constant state of upheaval, which results from differentiated movements, their speeds towards and among each other as well as the processes.

My work is based exclusively on autodidactic studies, combinations and the resulting conclusions. It is therefore only subject to certain formal requirements, such as the publication technique, to a limited extent.

Combining the old with the new and/or thinking differently. You have to be a little crazy to do that. Conservatives would probably not even give it a second thought or would immediately banish it from their minds. Because I am not an established and "recognized" scientist, I can approach everything completely differently and with an open mind.

From a purely scientific point of view, much is considered proven, but much is also theoretical, hypothetical and speculative. That is why this work also has its justification.

Content, content, content - as is often demanded - is nothing more than a lot of entertainment to distract from the essentials. I'm not a fan of that. Short and to the point information saves time, doesn't clutter your mind with a lot of garbage and is effective. Brevity is the spice of life, as they say - unless it requires a lot of explanation.

Even the most improbable thoughts, speculations, hypotheses and fantasies are real. However, they do not necessarily have to become established or take action. They merely remain as imagined information in (inout) space. But they exist because they were thought ...

Dr. MC SheekyB's interjection:

" ... or Hollywood made a movie out of it."

No hihi.

He's there too. But who is Dr. MC SheekyB? Well, the bird guy flew to me. More on that later. If he shows up, you shouldn't read what he has to say. If you do, it's your own fault, you've been warned.

I will explain what I mean by "(inout)" later on and use "io" as a short form.

You also need to be careful about giving new ideas to people, especially young people, who could undermine the power and control of the establishment. They don't like that. But nothing will change anyway, or only over a long period of time. By then they will be extinct. But in free countries there is freedom of opinion and freedom of expression.

One more thing: reading this book is at your own risk. Any remaining intellectual damage is non-transferable, cannot be returned or claimed in exchange for anything of value. A recommendation of this book is an action of your own sense of duty.

Epilogue after the foreword

It is as is often said: You should think big.

And to make sure this is justified, I'm going to do it here and turn the biggest wheel that has ever been turned. The sentence is a metaphor, because in fact it is not a wheel that turns, although everything does turn. You will experience how I reshape and reshape the entire matter of space in the universe.

So get on board and have fun! There will be more and more of them. So go for it and don't let your fear of dizziness, whiplash or circulatory problems stop you. If necessary, have some medication ready. This journey has no brakes.

At the same time, I am solving the biggest riddle that many are still searching for and explaining what it is all about. It also contains a "new" law of nature. No one has yet recognized it as such.

You think you already know everything? Maybe not until you've read this book. Then you will find yourself in a completely new and unknown universe and take a close look at everything. So that you can see everything, wait until it is bright enough.

This book will give your knowledge an enormous boost. And who wants to put up with ignorance? It will haunt you until you know everything.

It is also clear that there will be harsh criticism, slurs and attacks against it.

The world formula? The answer

Right at the beginning I answer the question about the world formula: It is: Yes! And that's where the dilemma begins, because whether it can be considered a formula is a matter of opinion.

I say you can make a formula, but ...?

I hereby show the solution that leads to this statement and the formula, or rather, an unusual formula solution. And much more, which seems important to me.

It is also assumed that no mathematical proof can be provided.

The solution is disguised. It behaves like the one tree that you can't see among many. A hide-and-seek game of "forces". The detailed explanation follows.

Science will probably find my findings too far-fetched and will therefore probably rule them out from the outset.

Who is Dr. MC SheekyB?

"Hello!" Dr. MC SheekyB speaks up.

"It could be. It could be behind the stone."

"What's supposed to be there?"

"To be or not to be."

"That could be logical."

(From: Dr. MC SheekyB's series "New Rhyme".) Hihi.

Who is Dr. MC SheekyB? He's the bird who occasionally demands attention or spouts some nonsense - with or without dialog ... very likeable, cheeky and biting from the side. (Although a bird has no teeth. I wonder how he does it - without teeth?) You don't know if he's out of them - or if he's got them all. His character? He's been trying to reinvent himself for generations. Unfortunately, still unsuccessfully.

Then there are a few questions regarding his name and some additions to be clarified. More on this in the following.

Please note

The world formula is supposed to describe the universe conclusively. Concluding would then actually result in a conclusion.

The problem is that no practical or theoretical proof can be found - either for or against any kind of world formula.

Hypothetically and imaginatively it is possible, but that would be more of a self-made invention.

It also gets interesting with the math.

How do you find answers that overcome the hurdles of bias(s)?

Answers that have often been forced upon you, are still being forced upon you and should not be doubted.

They are doubted, questions are asked and, if necessary, thrown into the dustbin of history.

In many publications, whether in books, films or the latest digital possibilities, there are statements such as "That's the way it is, that's the way it has always been", which someone has said, written or done at some point - and that makes it right forever and ever?

Wrong!

Everything is constantly changing. Change is the only constant in the inout content of the universe. Unfortunately, no mathematical value can be assigned to it. If this were the case, everything would be said at this point.

I have included many things that are all related to the question of the world formula and the universe; in and of itself, the functions "in it". The how and why everything in and outside (io) the universe works the way it does. The logic of all being and why nothingness is decisive for this.

I inevitably have to make corrections to existing theories. Not to forget that these are my findings and opinions, some of which may change again at any time due to other evidence.

Random principles

Everything that has developed, is developing and will develop is ultimately based on the principle of chance, but ordered on the basis of existing conditions: Whether in space, on earth, in nature or in our thoughts.

This also applies to every invention, every advance, every improvement - whether as a sudden inspiration or idea, whether it was specifically sought after or a decision we made. Our emotions play a major role. Ultimately, however, our decisions are always emotional and erratic.

The only exception to this is the search for solutions to problems that are generally technical, personnel-related and costing-related. Decisions are made objectively because the decision has already been made in the decision-making process and only needs to be confirmed.

However, the decision is always subject to a random, emotional intuition, taking into account what is already there.

The rule is: doesn't work, should work, or works. And vice versa. Or in relation to food: is digestible, is disgusting, is poisonous.

Our ancestors found this out by chance and it probably cost one or two people their lives.

Terms, names and assignments

We use them without really thinking about what they mean. They have become second nature to us and we generally know what they mean.

But the categorizations are made by us humans.

If you take it very seriously, they even come from the animal kingdom. Although they are only sounds there, they are used to communicate with each other. First and foremost, to find each other for the purpose of reproduction or food sharing.

Each resonance or timbre has its own frequency range, which can be precisely assigned to each animal. The parents, for example, recognize the sound of their child, which they have perceived directly with the first sounds of the individual child.

Due to our biological characteristic, the more differentiated production of sounds, we humans have ultimately produced considerably more sounds.

These led to the languages that we now use to communicate with each other and their interpretations.

Our more differentiated sounds became more complex strings that make up our concepts.

However, these had to be assigned to each other so that everyone understood what was meant; for example: You see a stone. The stone is the object and is called "stone". This phonetic concept was now taught to everyone else. From then on, everyone knew what the word stone meant. This is how our language came into being.

I think this brief and rough explanation makes it easy to understand how language developed and spread.

All - Order of terms

In my opinion, there is a confusion of terms relating to the universe. I have put these terms in a sensible order and explained them so that it is easier to understand what is meant in each case:

1) All, universe, space, everything and nothing, "vacuum/void": I define all these terms for one and the same thing as zero (mathematical), nothing (real).

I put "vacuum/void" in quotation marks because there is no absolute vacuum and no absolute void. Everything - or nothing - is the basis of everything, but not yet a space, hence a non-existence. Everything else are components. All and nothing can be interchanged and both can be interpreted as the same.

2) Space is only space when io nothing, matter, which is also gravity, is in motion. That is the case.

Space and outer space are therefore two terms that can be interpreted differently. Space stands for everything without boundaries. Space is part of the universe, or rather nothingness, but it expands infinitely.

3) Superordinate grand universes that we have not yet discovered.

These are much larger structures for which we still lack any imagination due to a lack of technical or other possibilities.

(We are probably in a similar situation to when the earth was still a disk).

4) Our known universe, cosmos, etc. - as far as we can explore it.

5) Galaxies, matter, gas and plasma clouds, black and "white" holes and possibly other as yet unknown objects.

6) Planetary systems and slow and fast moving objects.

7) Planets, respectively solid, icy and gaseous bodies.

8) The area within which biological existence is possible.

9) Microcosm

10) Quantum, atomic and subatomic level

11) Other micros that we have not yet discovered. (However, it is possible that we have already detected the smallest objects and we can't go any smaller. This would mean that it is a gas, plasma or something similar that changes into nothing and thus keeps the infinite change going). If there are technical possibilities later on, it may be possible to prove this.

However, this could also be the content of the "black holes". Why this could be the case becomes clear from my further explanation.

Due to our form of existence and the conditions available to us, we will not be able to explore this. This will require an evolutionary transformation, probably several, which will transform us into a different kind of being that will enable us to do so. But we should not give in to the illusion that we will then still remember our current existence.

However, this is probably difficult to accept for emotional and fear-inducing reasons.

And yet: it can be even smaller. Imagine that the smallest object we know of that can be detected ends up in a black hole. How much smaller would it get?

If the sun - as an example - is only as small as a pinhead in it, how small is an atom in it, for example?

The larger and heavier the black hole is, the smaller the objects in it are. But it is certainly only a single object, because all the matter in it has possibly merged together. We will probably never find out exactly how it behaves.

Then these objects are no longer the ones that got in there, because the matter is already torn apart during the attraction process and something is formed from it that we cannot fathom. We don't get a reflection like we do from objects below the speed of light.

What goes into it becomes a single object, similar to another state of matter. For example, water is liquid, frozen to ice or vapor depending on the heat. The "black hole" itself is this aggregate state, depending on the surrounding and internal gravity.

Matter gets smaller and smaller, even to almost infinitely small, but never disappears completely.

The laws of physics as we know them are suspended. The formula E=MC² may also lose its validity. Only the constant of eternal change is eternal.

Due to the imbalance - no matter how tiny - the smallest particles clump together to form larger units/gravitational forces and the process starts again, under the ever-changing conditions. There is another solution that I favor in connection with a "white" hole.

Now, how could it be otherwise, Dr. MC SheekyB:

"Watch out! I'm super fast, fly into the black hole and when I get back, I'll tell you what's going on."

"A very good idea. It also cleanses your brain. As you know, a brain with nothing in it has the highest IQ that can no longer be measured." Hihi.

"An insinuation. I'm smart."

"Yes, yes!"

The inside, outside dilemma

We often talk about "in space". If we don't think about it any further, we accept it.

But "in" space is not correct because it is infinite. If something is somewhere in it, then that means it is in a place with limits.

However, infinity knows no boundaries and therefore something that is "in" space is also outside of space at the same time.

How do we get out of this mentally?

In principle not at all, if ...?

Measures, measuring tools, weights, scales, clocks that measure time and many other tools were invented by us and are used for the above terms, which were also invented by us.

I thought for a long time about how to solve the import/export dilemma. Finally, I came up with the cryptocurrency solution.

This represented a gap in the capital structure and was very quickly closed with currencies such as tokens and coins. Computer technology provided the prerequisite and thus created the gap.

Crypto is encryption technology. It lent itself as an umbrella term for currencies because they are all encrypted.

And suddenly I had the solution to the simultaneous all/inside/outside problem.

I played around with a few combinations of terms and the most appealing solution I came up with is: "inout" - a combination of the English terms in and out, or "io" for short.

Io All now means that something is simultaneously inside and outside of space and matter. Io is easy to remember because of its brevity and phonetics.

I find other combinations like inex (from "internal" and "external"), ix for short, not so suitable because it sounds phonetically choppy. Io All sounds more harmonious! Io is now the term for both inside and outside in this work.

Well, my train of thought may be a little crazy, but it certainly can't be categorically dismissed. Who knows what else will be confirmed and someone had to do it. So I did.

Dr. MC SheekyB's idea:

"Tell me, what does a cold air movement feel like when it's new?"

"A breath of fresh air. But tell me: what do three flaps of your wings do?"

"Dwarf storm!" Hihi.

Names

They are an invention of us humans, often derived from activities (such as: Schmid, Bauer etc.) or other special characteristics. We need these classifications in order to be able to distinguish who is who or what. But in fact, nothing that exists has a name or a designation.

Names are overrated. This also applies to some terms. They are only intended to have a psychological or emotional effect, the meaning of which is also overrated, but only serves the purpose of manipulation. I am also affected by this and cannot exclude myself. Without the terms, we would not get any further and the question arises in my mind: Does this account for one of the significant differences in intelligence between humans and animals?

Instincts, emotions and feelings are the decision-makers that are used to make decisions based on their needs of whatever kind. This happens in conjunction with the conditions of their environment.

I explain this using these examples:

In the plant kingdom, the decision on what is needed to grow is based on their biological nature and the available, suitable resources.

Instinctive decisions mainly take place in the animal kingdom. They are primarily based on hunger and the procreation of offspring.

People also have feelings. They make decisions based on emotions and feelings. Purely factual decisions are also based on their facts, but ultimately the decision is guided and made by emotions and feelings. The power of forces plays a role here, which ultimately brings about the decision.

And a decisive factor is doubt. Animals do not doubt. They do.

Doubt, however, leads to new insights and inventions.

However, if there are what I call emotional incompatibilities, decisions are difficult to make. Then the so-called chemistry between the parties involved is not right.

Penetrating forces

Penetrating forces, as I call them. These are the decisive forces that act as control options.

Zero (or emptiness), gravitational forces, heat and cold. They permeate all matter, in principle without any obstacles.

Nothing (real), zero (mathematical) or the void as a passive "force", permeates everything, but is also simultaneously in everything, across all dimensions and distances.

Gravitational forces act as far as their respective radii of action reach and penetrate everything there in interaction with the gravitational objects surrounding them.

Heat, which also includes radiation, and cold also permeate everything, but influence each other.