The Editor's Relations with the Young Contributor (from Literature and Life) E-Book

William Dean Howells

• Herausgeber: DigiCat
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2022

Beschreibung

In 'The Editor's Relations with the Young Contributor' from 'Literature and Life', William Dean Howells delves into a detailed analysis of the dynamics between editors and aspiring writers during his time. Howells presents a thought-provoking study of the literary world, addressing the struggles and triumphs of both parties with insight and empathy. His writing style is characterized by a perfect balance of critique and encouragement, offering practical advice to young contributors while also highlighting the responsibilities of editors in nurturing new talent. The book provides a valuable glimpse into the publishing industry of the 19th century, shedding light on the challenges faced by emerging writers and the importance of mentorship in the creative process. Through his astute observations and engaging prose, Howells elevates the discussion of writer-editor relationships to a scholarly level, making this work essential reading for anyone interested in literature and the editorial process.

Leseprobe

William Dean Howells

The Editor's Relations with the Young Contributor (from Literature and Life)

 

EAN 8596547327851

DigiCat, 2022 Contact: [email protected]

Table of Contents

I.

II.

III.

IV.

VI.

PG EDITOR'S BOOKMARKS

I.

Table of Contents

The new contributor who does charm can have little notion how much he charms his first reader, who is the editor. That functionary may bide his pleasure in a short, stiff note of acceptance, or he may mask his joy in a check of slender figure; but the contributor may be sure that he has missed no merit in his work, and that he has felt, perhaps far more than the public will feel, such delight as it can give.

The contributor may take the acceptance as a token that his efforts have not been neglected, and that his achievements will always be warmly welcomed; that even his failures will be leniently and reluctantly recognized as failures, and that he must persist long in failure before the friend he has made will finally forsake him.

I do not wish to paint the situation wholly rose color; the editor will have his moods, when he will not see so clearly or judge so justly as at other times; when he will seem exacting and fastidious, and will want this or that mistaken thing done to the story, or poem, or sketch, which the author knows to be simply perfect as it stands; but he is worth bearing with, and he will be constant to the new contributor as long as there is the least hope of him.

The contributor may be the man or the woman of one story, one poem, one sketch, for there are such; but the editor will wait the evidence of indefinite failure to this effect. His hope always is that he or she is the man or the woman of many stories, many poems, many sketches, all as good as the first.

From my own long experience as a magazine editor, I may say that the editor is more doubtful of failure in one who has once done well than of a second success. After all, the writer who can do but one good thing is rarer than people are apt to think in their love of the improbable; but the real danger with a young contributor is that he may become his own rival.

What would have been quite good enough from him in the first instance is not good enough in the second, because he has himself fixed his standard so high. His only hope is to surpass himself, and not begin resting on his laurels too soon; perhaps it is never well, soon or late, to rest upon one's laurels. It is well for one to make one's self scarce, and the best way to do this is to be more and more jealous of perfection in one's work.

The editor's conditions are that having found a good thing he must get as much of it as he can, and the chances are that he will be less exacting than the contributor imagines. It is for the contributor to be exacting, and to let nothing go to the editor as long as there is the possibility of making it better. He need not be afraid of being forgotten because he does not keep sending; the editor's memory is simply relentless; he could not forget the writer who has pleased him if he would, for such writers are few.