1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Sachliteratur, Reportagen, Biografien
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Greatest Cases of Pinkerton Detective Agency," Allan Pinkerton presents a captivating collection of real-life investigations conducted by his renowned agency during the 19th century. This work is characterized by its detailed narrative style, drawing readers into the intricate web of crime and mystery that defined the era. Pinkerton's vivid accounts combine elements of adventure and suspense while offering a glimpse into the socio-political landscape of post-Civil War America, where lawlessness often prevailed. The book not only recounts thrilling escapades but also emphasizes the innovative methods developed by the agency, paving the way for modern detective work. Allan Pinkerton, a Scottish immigrant and the founder of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, brought his unique experiences as a labor organizer and spy during the Civil War into his writings. His keen understanding of crime and punishment, coupled with a relentless commitment to justice, shaped both the agency's ethos and his narrative style. Pinkerton's background allowed him to blend dramatic storytelling with profound insights into human nature, making the cases resonate with contemporary readers. This book is an essential read for enthusiasts of true crime and detective fiction alike. It not only offers an enthralling look at high-stakes investigations but also serves as a testament to the origins of modern criminal investigation techniques. Pinkerton's engaging prose and meticulous attention to detail ensure that readers will be drawn into the world of 19th-century sleuthing, making it a worthwhile addition to any library. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Ähnliche
The Greatest Cases of Pinkerton Detective Agency
Table of Contents
Introduction
A shadow crosses the threshold of a new nation, and a detective steps forward to meet it. This book introduces readers to a world where cunning meets discipline, where patient observation counters audacity, and where the pursuit of truth is both practical craft and moral calling. In the sprawling, restless landscape of nineteenth-century America, Allan Pinkerton made detection a profession and a narrative art. The cases assembled here do more than recount crimes; they chart the emergence of modern investigative thinking. They capture the chase itself—its suspense, method, and consequence—while suggesting a larger argument about order, character, and the fragile bonds of civic trust.
Allan Pinkerton (1819–1884), a Scottish immigrant who founded the Pinkerton National Detective Agency in 1850, wrote extensively about the agency’s investigations. He documented burglaries, forgeries, robberies, and elaborate schemes, drawing on the experiences of operatives who traversed railways, river towns, and growing cities. His case narratives sit at the crossroads of reportage and storytelling, shaped by a conviction that careful inquiry could restore public confidence amid rapid social change. The agency’s methods—surveillance, undercover work, coordinated pursuit—were presented not only as sensational episodes, but as demonstrations of professional rigor in an era hungry for security and explanation.
This volume is considered a classic because it helped define how readers imagine detectives and detection. Before the codification of many genre conventions, Pinkerton’s narratives offered a recognizable template: stakeouts, aliases, patient accumulation of small facts, and the steady tightening of a net. The stories bridged entertainment and instruction, showing that suspense could be engineered through procedure as much as surprise. Their longevity rests on more than novelty. They map an early American confidence in reasoned inquiry, while acknowledging the murkiness of motives and the unpredictability of human behavior—tensions that continue to animate crime writing and keep these accounts compelling.
The literary impact of Pinkerton’s case writing reaches beyond its own era. Its casefile structure, matter-of-fact tone, and emphasis on method proved adaptable, influencing later true-crime reportage and the procedural rhythms embraced by novelists and journalists alike. The persona of the private detective—professional yet independent, meticulous yet daring—acquired durable contours in these pages. Techniques such as undercover infiltration and coordinated communication became narrative engines, providing a grammar for suspense that subsequent authors could refine. The result is a lineage of investigation-centered storytelling that echoes through twentieth- and twenty-first-century treatments of crime, evidence, and the search for accountability.
Written in the latter half of the nineteenth century, and drawn from investigations conducted after the agency’s founding in 1850, the cases presented here showcase Pinkerton’s favored mode: detailed, chronological accounts that follow an inquiry from suspicion to resolution. The author’s aim was to record notable operations, demonstrate professional standards, and reassure readers that persistent, organized effort could penetrate deception. Readers meet operatives, observe their methods, and witness how small observations accumulate into decisive breakthroughs. Without revealing outcomes, the volume emphasizes process—how clues are noticed, hypotheses tested, and errors corrected—underscoring the belief that diligence and prudence can prevail over bravado.
Pinkerton wrote as both investigator and advocate for a new kind of public service. He promoted the idea that detection ought to be methodical, ethical, and documented, rather than improvised or theatrical. His accounts highlight practices that now seem foundational: record-keeping, coordination across distances, discreet surveillance, and the use of evolving technologies to outpace fugitives and frauds. The prose asserts professional identity through restraint and clarity. It also carries a didactic edge, proposing that vigilance and integrity are as essential as cleverness. The author’s intention is clear: to present detection as a disciplined craft that upholds order without surrendering to sensationalism.
As narratives, these cases display a confident command of pacing and scene. Pinkerton alternates between patient groundwork and bursts of confrontation, ensuring that the reader follows the operative’s reasoning rather than merely sampling dramatic moments. Character sketches are brisk but telling, meant to illuminate habits rather than indulge caricature. Settings do more than decorate the page; they function as networks—depots, boarding houses, saloons, offices—through which rumors travel and trails either dissolve or sharpen. The result is a form of storytelling that is immersive yet controlled, inviting readers to engage the logic of inquiry while feeling the pressure of time and uncertainty.
Thematically, the book charts the collision of mobility, anonymity, and ambition in a nation on the move. Railways compress distances, cities multiply opportunities, and new markets invite both enterprise and fraud. Pinkerton’s detectives navigate that flux by cultivating patience, building local knowledge, and learning to read the small signs that movement leaves behind. Disguise and identity recur as motifs: operatives adopt roles, suspects reinvent themselves, and reputations shift under scrutiny. Underneath is a steady confidence in the legibility of human behavior, tempered by the knowledge that appearances deceive. The work acknowledges contingency while arguing for the power of careful, cumulative insight.
These accounts also gesture toward ethical questions that still concern readers. What are the responsibilities and limits of private power acting in the name of public safety? How should investigators balance secrecy with accountability, determination with restraint? Pinkerton’s narratives do not pause for abstract debate, but the dilemmas surface as operatives infiltrate circles, cultivate informants, and make decisions with real consequences. The book thus prompts reflection on trust and authority, showing how the promise of order depends on choices made under pressure. It presents craft and conscience as inseparable, suggesting that professionalism is measured not only by results but by the means employed.
For contemporary audiences, the relevance is immediate. The bones of modern investigation—pattern analysis, discreet surveillance, coordination across jurisdictions—remain visible here in their formative stages. Readers who consume today’s true-crime podcasts and procedurals will recognize the same satisfactions: the slow bloom of a theory, the risk of a false lead, the quiet thrill when disparate facts align. The book’s historical vantage point adds resonance, revealing how concerns about mobility, fraud, and information circulated long before the digital age. It offers perspective on current debates by showing their antecedents, and it satisfies curiosity about how method became a cultural touchstone.
To read these cases is to encounter a distinctive voice of authority and a portrait of a society improvising new systems of trust. The prose can be brisk, even spare, but it allows character, setting, and motive to accumulate with weight. Readers are guided without being coddled; inference is encouraged. Beyond suspense, the book offers a textured glimpse of everyday practices—train schedules, financial exchanges, regional habits—that shape the plausibility of a scheme and the likelihood of its collapse. The pleasure lies in seeing how keen attention, patiently applied, transforms the ordinary into evidence and uncertainty into resolution.
In sum, this volume endures because it marries a faith in disciplined inquiry with a clear-eyed understanding of human complexity. It articulates themes of vigilance, identity, accountability, and the fragile compact between citizens and those who protect them. Its cases demonstrate that method is a form of narrative—one that advances through questions, tests, and revisions—and that such narrative can be as gripping as any melodrama. By giving readers both a craft to admire and a moral horizon to consider, The Greatest Cases of Pinkerton Detective Agency remains engaging, instructive, and alive to the concerns that continue to shape how we think about crime and justice.
Synopsis (Selection)
The Greatest Cases of Pinkerton Detective Agency, by Allan Pinkerton, collects narrative accounts of investigations that shaped the agency’s reputation in nineteenth-century America. Presented as self-contained case histories, the chapters describe major assignments undertaken for railroads, banks, express companies, and governments, alongside the methods employed to solve them. The book moves chronologically from early railroad protection work through wartime intelligence and into the violent postwar era of train robbers and industrial conflict. Without digression or memoir, Pinkerton focuses on operational detail: how suspects were identified, tailed, and confronted; how informants and decoys were deployed; and how evidence was documented to achieve convictions.
Opening sections establish the agency’s origins in the Midwest and the rise of private detection as interstate commerce expanded. Pinkerton outlines the logistical tools he considered essential: discreet shadowing teams, coded telegraph messages, centralized files, and what became a rogues gallery of descriptions and likenesses. He stresses disciplined reporting and the division of labor among operatives, including the early employment of women detectives for assignments requiring social access. These chapters also sketch the crime landscape of the period, with railroad depots, express offices, and riverfronts as recurring scenes. The emphasis remains procedural, laying out how planning, cover identities, and patience underpinned later successes.
One of the first marquee cases details the threat to President-elect Abraham Lincoln during his 1861 journey to Washington. Pinkerton recounts receiving intelligence of a planned attack centered in Baltimore and assembling a covert team to verify the rumors. Through surveillance of meeting places, intercepted chatter, and undercover introductions, the agency mapped the suspected conspiracy. The narrative follows the subsequent protective plan, which altered Lincoln’s route and timetable and relied on quiet coordination across rail lines. The episode is presented as a turning point: it showcased the agency’s ability to fuse reconnaissance with security operations and established its national standing.
Chapters on the Civil War describe the organization of a field intelligence service supporting Union commands. Pinkerton outlines recruitment of agents, the creation of courier pathways, and techniques for estimating enemy dispositions from interviews, maps, and observed movements. Reports were compiled into briefings circulated to senior officers, highlighting supply conditions, morale indicators, and probable intentions of opposing forces. The book emphasizes the operational challenges of clandestine work in contested territory, including communication delays and the need for redundant sources. While acknowledging uncertainty, the narrative presents the system as a structured attempt to transform fragmentary observations into usable military information.
Postwar chapters return to commercial crime, including a prominent express robbery investigated for Adams Express. Pinkerton describes the initial audit discrepancies, identification of an insider with access, and the gradual tightening of surveillance on the suspect and associates. Undercover lodgings, staged conversations, and controlled correspondence are used to provoke revealing actions. The account traces the recovery of hidden funds and the building of a prosecutable case through corroborated witness statements and physical evidence. Throughout, Pinkerton illustrates how patience, compartmentalized teams, and methodical documentation converted suspicion into proof, offering a model the agency repeated in subsequent financial and embezzlement inquiries.
The emergence of train robbery as a new crime prompts extended coverage of the Reno Gang pursuit. The book follows the coordination among detectives, railroad officials, and sheriffs across state lines as robberies struck moving targets and rural depots. Pinkerton emphasizes rapid telegraphic alerts, description circulars, and systematic canvassing of boardinghouses and livery stables. Arrests in multiple jurisdictions and prisoner transfers introduce jurisdictional conflicts and security complications. The narrative also records extrajudicial violence that overtook some captives, noting its effect on the investigation’s course. The case illustrates the agency’s interstate reach and the tactical adjustments required by mobile, armed bands.
In the coal regions of Pennsylvania, the agency undertook a prolonged infiltration of secretive groups linked to mine-related violence, a case later identified with the Molly Maguires. Pinkerton presents the planning of deep cover, the careful cultivation of contacts, and the accumulation of documentary and testimonial evidence over years. The account culminates in coordinated arrests and court proceedings where operative testimony is central. The narrative situates the investigation amid labor tensions and private security contracts, focusing on the mechanics of maintaining cover and preserving chains of evidence. It highlights the personal risks to operatives and the procedural demands of sustained undercover work.
Further chapters address Western and border-state outlaws associated with train and bank robberies, including the pursuit of the James-Younger network and allied gangs. Pinkerton describes tracking methods adapted to sparsely populated terrain: informant rewards, surveillance of suppliers, and cooperation with local posses. The narrative acknowledges setbacks, mistaken leads, and the difficulty of arresting figures protected by kinship and community ties. Emphasis falls on broad coordination—spreading descriptions through handbills and newspapers, synchronizing watches at depots and river crossings, and monitoring telegraph chatter. These cases underscore both the reach of the agency’s network and the limits of private force against entrenched notoriety.
Concluding sections distill principles recurring across the cases: discretion, documentation, teamwork, and adaptability to new criminal techniques. Pinkerton underscores standardized reports, centralized files, and the disciplined use of covers and decoys, while noting the value of women operatives and specialized skills. The book’s overall message is practical rather than rhetorical: that organized, methodical inquiry can penetrate complex conspiracies and evolving crimes if resourced and coordinated. It also conveys the emergence of national-scale policing functions in private hands during a period of rapid growth. As a compilation, the work offers a sequential portrait of how notable cases refined the agency’s craft.
Historical Context
Allan Pinkerton’s cases unfold in the United States from the late 1840s through the early 1880s, with Chicago as the principal base of operations. This was an era spanning the antebellum period, the Civil War (1861–1865), Reconstruction (1865–1877), and the Gilded Age. Rapid urbanization and industrial growth transformed cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, New York, and St. Louis, while frontier regions and railroad towns boomed. The political landscape shifted from sectional crisis to nation-building and corporate consolidation. The book’s narratives traverse this geography, moving along rail lines, through mining districts in Pennsylvania, into border-state Missouri, and across Midwestern hubs where banking, express shipment, and law enforcement intersected.
The social context was marked by mass immigration, especially from Ireland and Germany, intensified class tensions, and the swift spread of railroads—from roughly 9,000 miles in 1850 to more than 53,000 by 1870 and 93,000 by 1880. Public policing was fragmented, with limited federal capacity before 1908, prompting corporations and railroads to hire private detectives. Pinkerton’s agency, founded in Chicago, filled this gap by pursuing interstate criminals, guarding trains, and conducting undercover work. The book reflects these pressures: it documents crimes born of mobility and industrial finance, and it mirrors debates over the legitimacy of private security, professional surveillance, and the ethics of undercover operations.
The Pinkerton National Detective Agency was founded in 1850 by Allan Pinkerton (1819–1884), a Scottish immigrant and former Chicago lawman. Early contracts with railroads and express companies established a national footprint, supported by field offices and a communications network. The firm’s motto, "We Never Sleep," and its unblinking eye logo symbolized perpetual vigilance and helped popularize the term "private eye." The book curates emblematic episodes from the agency’s rise, presenting cases that forged its methods: undercover work, detailed record-keeping, and multi-jurisdictional pursuit. By foregrounding formative investigations, the collection historicizes how a private firm became integral to American policing infrastructure.
Railroad expansion and the growth of express companies (Adams Express, American Express) created new criminal opportunities: train robberies, mail theft, and complex fraud. After 1860, telegraphs and time-tables standardized commerce, but also gave organized gangs a predictable target. The agency protected shipments, mapped routes, and coordinated with local sheriffs along corridors like the Chicago–St. Louis and Ohio–Pennsylvania lines. The book recounts investigative routines around depots, safes, and baggage rooms, situating Pinkerton within the logistics economy. Its cases explain how surveillance of stations, express agents, and switching yards became central to modern security, and why corporations turned repeatedly to private detectives for protection and recovery.
The 1861 Baltimore Plot to assassinate President-elect Abraham Lincoln crystallized the agency’s political role. In February 1861, Pinkerton operatives, including the pioneering female detective Kate Warne, infiltrated secessionist circles in Baltimore and identified conspirators said to intend an attack during Lincoln’s transfer between stations. On the night of February 23, Lincoln quietly passed through Baltimore en route to Washington, D.C., under heightened security and altered scheduling via Philadelphia. The book presents this episode as proof of the agency’s preventive capacities and of its ties to national politics, framing clandestine travel, code names, and decoy timetables as early counter-assassination tradecraft.
During the Civil War, Pinkerton led the Union Intelligence Service under Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan in 1861–1862, operating under the alias "E. J. Allen." His network gathered reports on Confederate troop strengths, rail movements, and fortifications during the Western Virginia and Peninsula campaigns. Operatives cultivated sources among refugees, deserters, and Unionist sympathizers; they used cover identities, couriers, and ciphered dispatches. The book connects to these operations through detailed case narratives that portray the creation of field intelligence files, the vetting of HUMINT, and the hazards of reconnaissance behind enemy lines—illustrating how wartime exigencies shaped Pinkerton’s analytic and organizational methods.
Pinkerton’s estimates of Confederate numbers, especially before Richmond in 1862, were later criticized as systematically high, influencing McClellan’s caution. By 1863, the Army’s Bureau of Military Information professionalized intelligence under Col. George H. Sharpe, while the U.S. Secret Service was formally established in 1865 (Treasury) to combat counterfeiting. The book registers this transition by reflecting on methodological lessons—source validation, bias, and overreliance on refugee testimony—and by portraying Pinkerton’s disputed legacy with candor. Its Civil War chapters thus become a 300-word core of the collection, linking the agency’s early espionage to later, more standardized government intelligence and policing practices.
The Reno Gang terrorized the Midwest with the first peacetime train robbery in U.S. history on October 6, 1866, near Seymour, Indiana, targeting Adams Express shipments. Between 1866 and 1868, the gang repeatedly struck rail lines in Indiana and Illinois before members were arrested; several were lynched by vigilantes in 1868. Pinkerton detectives trailed the Renos across county and state lines, coordinating with express companies and local sheriffs. The book underscores the Reno pursuit as a template for interjurisdictional cooperation and for techniques—decoy packages, informants in rail yards—that became fixtures of corporate security and private detection.
The James–Younger Gang, former Confederate guerrillas active from the late 1860s to mid-1870s, robbed banks, stagecoaches, and trains in Missouri, Iowa, and beyond. After a Pinkerton agent was killed while tracking them, the agency mounted aggressive operations. A botched raid at the James farm near Kearney, Missouri, in January 1875 involved an explosive device that killed Jesse James’s half-brother, Archie Samuel, and maimed his mother, Zerelda. Public opinion turned sharply against the agency. The book treats these episodes as cautionary histories, documenting how pursuit strategies, acceptable force, and public legitimacy were contested in the wake of high-profile violence.
In Pennsylvania’s anthracite coal region, the Molly Maguires—alleged Irish-American secret societies tied to mine-labor violence—were infiltrated by Pinkerton operative James McParland beginning in 1873. Trials in Schuylkill and Carbon counties, driven by railroad magnate Franklin B. Gowen’s prosecutions, yielded convictions and hangings on June 21, 1877 ("Day of the Rope"), with additional executions through 1879. Critics later condemned the trials for private influence and ethnic prejudice. The book mirrors McParland’s reports and the agency’s narrative of undercover work inside the Ancient Order of Hibernians, presenting names, dates, and courtroom outcomes that shaped national debates over labor, ethnicity, and corporate policing.
The Great Chicago Fire of October 8–10, 1871 destroyed much of the city’s core, killed approximately 300 people, and displaced over 100,000. In the aftermath, ad hoc security, insurance assessments, and property protection became urgent. Pinkerton personnel helped guard warehouses, rail depots, and temporary treasuries as municipal services were restored. The agency’s Chicago base rebuilt in a city that rapidly adopted fire codes, steel-frame construction, and modernized police routines. The book situates Chicago’s catastrophe as a crucible for urban security practices, linking the firm’s logistical expertise to a broader reorganization of patrol, alarm, and insurance-backed risk management.
The Great Railroad Strike of 1877 erupted in Martinsburg, West Virginia, on July 14 and spread to Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and St. Louis, protesting wage cuts amid a prolonged depression. Federal troops were deployed; clashes left dozens dead, including at Pittsburgh in late July. Railroads hired private guards and detectives to protect track, rolling stock, and depots. The book’s labor-related chapters reflect this environment, showing Pinkerton assignments guarding trains and tracking alleged arsonists and saboteurs. It contextualizes the agency’s controversial strikebreaking role within national unrest and depicts how corporate security tactics escalated alongside mass mobilization.
The Haymarket Affair of May 4, 1886 in Chicago followed a series of labor rallies for the eight-hour day; a bomb at Haymarket Square killed seven policemen and several civilians, and eight anarchists were tried, with four executed in 1887. While Chicago police led the case, the city’s climate of surveillance, informant networks, and employer alliances had been established over prior decades. The book reflects the intellectual and policing milieu that Haymarket crystallized, echoing themes from Pinkerton’s 1878 volume, "Strikers, Communists, Tramps and Detectives," and portraying how radical politics, police repression, and private intelligence intertwined in the industrial metropolis.
The Homestead Strike of 1892, at Carnegie Steel’s Homestead Works near Pittsburgh, saw a pitched battle on July 6 when approximately 300 Pinkerton agents attempted to reach the mill by barge; at least nine people died before Pennsylvania militia intervened. Although Allan Pinkerton had died in 1884, the agency under his sons William and Robert was central to events. The case—often included in later "greatest cases" compendia—illustrates the culmination of private paramilitary tactics against unionized labor. The book’s broader narrative foreshadows Homestead by tracing the evolution from property protection and detective work to full-scale industrial security operations.
Counterfeiting and financial crime surged during and after the Civil War, prompting the formation of the U.S. Secret Service in 1865 under the Treasury Department. Before and alongside federal efforts, Pinkerton detectives pursued counterfeiters in Illinois, Ohio, and New York, targeting engraving workshops, distribution networks, and corrupt note brokers. Agency files documented plate seizures, sting operations in saloons and printing shops, and coordination with bank associations. The book incorporates such cases to chart the transition from private to public monetary policing, emphasizing dates, locations, and recoveries that grounded confidence in currency and helped stabilize commerce in the Reconstruction economy.
As a social and political critique, the book exposes the vacuum in mid-century law enforcement that allowed corporations to commission their own quasi-police. By detailing interstate chases and undercover work, it quietly questions a system in which public order depended on private contracts, from rail depots to mining towns. The narratives lay bare how surveillance followed not only criminals but workers and activists, illuminating the asymmetry between capital’s resources and local authorities. Through specificity—names, dates, trials—the cases frame debates over due process, force, and accountability that lawmakers only later addressed through professionalized public agencies.
The collection also indicts the social fractures of the Gilded Age: ethnic scapegoating in the Molly Maguires prosecutions, explosive class confrontation from 1877 to 1892, and the precarious legal standing of undercover testimony. By narrating the Baltimore Plot and Civil War espionage, it probes executive security and emergency powers in a divided republic. The book’s method—documentary detail of rail, bank, and courtroom—reveals how industrial capitalism reordered justice, privileging property and corporate continuity over community legitimacy. In doing so, it critiques the era’s tolerance for private violence, highlights the risks to civil liberties, and anticipates calls for transparent, public oversight of security.
Author Biography
Allan Pinkerton (1819–1884) was a Scottish-born American detective, intelligence organizer, and prolific writer whose name became synonymous with private detection in the United States during the mid-nineteenth century. As founder of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, he helped professionalize investigative work for railroads, express companies, and other private clients, and briefly for the federal government during the Civil War. Pinkerton’s public profile grew through high-profile cases and through books issued under his name that blended reportage with narrative flair. His agency’s emblem—an unblinking eye with the motto “We Never Sleep”—made him a national figure and an enduring presence in American popular culture.
Pinkerton was born in Rutherglen, near Glasgow, and apprenticed as a cooper, with limited formal schooling. In Scotland he engaged with the Chartist movement, an experience that exposed him to organized political activism and sharpened his interest in public affairs. He emigrated to the United States in the early 1840s and settled near Chicago, where he supported himself as a craftsman while educating himself through reading and civic involvement. The rapid expansion of railroads and commerce in the American Midwest provided both the need and the opportunity for investigative work, shaping the practical orientation that defined his later career.
His transition from cooper to detective, often recounted in his own writings, began when he stumbled upon a counterfeiting operation while working in the woods, leading local authorities to enlist his help. By the late 1840s he was undertaking official investigative duties in the Chicago area. In 1850 he established the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, which quickly secured contracts from rail and express companies. The firm emphasized methodical surveillance, undercover infiltration, and centralized files, including a photographic “rogues’ gallery.” Pinkerton also hired Kate Warne in the mid-1850s, often cited as the first female detective in the United States, expanding the range of techniques available to his operatives.
On the eve of the Civil War, Pinkerton and his operatives investigated a rumored plot to attack President-elect Abraham Lincoln during a stopover in Maryland, and they assisted in discreetly moving Lincoln to safety. During the war’s early years, he organized intelligence-gathering for Union forces, particularly for the Army of the Potomac. His estimates of enemy strength were criticized as overly cautious, yet he helped systematize field intelligence and undercover work at a time when such practices were still nascent. After the war, he returned to private operations, building a network that handled cases across the United States and parts of Canada.
Pinkerton advanced his public image through a stream of books marketed as true accounts of investigations. Notable titles credited to him include The Expressman and the Detective, The Somnambulist and the Detective, Bank Robbers and the Detectives, The Model Town and the Detectives, The Molly Maguires and the Detectives, Strikers, Communists, Tramps and Detectives, and The Spy of the Rebellion. Issued mainly in the 1870s and early 1880s, these volumes combined case detail with melodramatic pacing and moral commentary. They were widely read, shaping popular expectations of detectives as tireless, incorruptible professionals and promoting the agency’s brand to a nationwide readership.
Pinkerton’s career also intersected with the era’s most contentious social conflicts. His agency guarded property during strikes and was retained to investigate labor and secret societies, themes he addressed in The Molly Maguires and the Detectives and Strikers, Communists, Tramps and Detectives. The firm pursued notorious outlaws, including confrontations with the James–Younger network that proved controversial and, at times, deadly. Supporters credited Pinkerton with deterring crime and professionalizing investigations; critics argued that private policing threatened civil liberties and tilted power toward corporate clients. These debates have become a central part of how historians assess his public role.
In his later years, Pinkerton continued to manage the agency and publish, consolidating procedures—such as centralized records and coordinated fieldwork—that influenced both private and public investigations. He died in the 1880s, and the firm continued under family leadership, expanding as industrial America grew. Today, his books are read as period documents that illuminate nineteenth-century crime, business power, and the development of intelligence work, rather than as strict reportage. The Pinkerton legacy remains complex: a mixture of innovation and controversy. Yet Allan Pinkerton’s imprint on American detection and the popular imagination is unmistakable and still visible in discussions of private security and policing.
The Greatest Cases of Pinkerton Detective Agency
The Expressman and the Detective
PREFACE.
During the greater portion of a very busy life, I have been actively engaged in the profession of a Detective, and hence have been brought in contact with many men, and have been an interested participant in many exciting occurrences.
The narration of some of the most interesting of these events, happening in connection with my professional labors, is the realization of a pleasure I have long anticipated, and is the fulfillment of promises repeatedly made to numerous friends in by gone days.
"The Expressman and the Detective,"
and the other works announced by my publishers, are all true stories, transcribed from the Records in my offices. If there be any incidental embellishment, it is so slight that the actors in these scenes from the drama of life would never themselves detect it; and if the incidents seem to the reader at all marvelous or improbable, I can but remind him, in the words of the old adage, that "Truth is stranger than fiction."
ALLAN PINKERTON.
Chicago, October, 1874.
CHAPTER I.
Montgomery, Alabama, is beautifully situated on the Alabama river, near the centre of the State. Its situation at the head of navigation, on the Alabama river, its connection by rail with important points, and the rich agricultural country with which it is surrounded, make it a great commercial centre, and the second city in the State as regards wealth and population. It is the capital, and consequently learned men and great politicians flock to it, giving it a society of the highest rank, and making it the social centre of the State.
From 1858 to 1860, the time of which I treat in the present work, the South was in a most prosperous condition. "Cotton was king," and millions of dollars were poured into the country for its purchase, and a fair share of this money found its way to Montgomery.
When the Alabama planters had gathered their crops of cotton, tobacco, rice, etc., they sent them to Montgomery to be sold, and placed the proceeds on deposit in its banks. During their busy season, while overseeing the labor of their slaves, they were almost entirely debarred from the society of any but their own families; but when the crops were gathered they went with their families to Montgomery, where they gave themselves up to enjoyment, spending their money in a most lavish manner.
There were several good hotels in the city and they were always filled to overflowing with the wealth and beauty of the South.
The Adams Express Company had a monopoly of the express business of the South, and had established its agencies at all points with which there was communication by rail, steam or stage. They handled all the money sent to the South for the purchase of produce, or remitted to the North in payment of merchandise. Moreover, as they did all the express business for the banks, besides moving an immense amount of freight, it is evident that their business was enormous.
At all points of importance, where there were diverging routes of communication, the company had established principal agencies, at which all through freight and the money pouches were delivered by the messengers. The agents at these points were selected with the greatest care, and were always considered men above reproach. Montgomery being a great centre of trade was made the western terminus of one of the express routes, Atlanta being the eastern. The messengers who had charge of the express matter between these two points were each provided with a safe and with a pouch. The latter was to contain only such packages as were to go over the whole route, consisting of money or other valuables. The messenger was not furnished with a key to the pouch, but it was handed to him locked by the agent at one end of the route to be delivered in the same condition to the agent at the other end.
The safe was intended for way packages, and of it the messenger of course had a key. The pouch was carried in the safe, each being protected by a lock of peculiar construction.
The Montgomery office in 1858, and for some years previous, had been in charge of Nathan Maroney, and he had made himself one of the most popular agents in the company's employ.
He was married, and with his wife and one daughter, had pleasant quarters at the Exchange Hotel, one of the best houses in the city. He possessed all the qualifications which make a popular man. He had a genial, hearty manner, which endeared him to the open, hospitable inhabitants of Montgomery, so that he was "hail fellow, well met," with most of its populace. He possessed great executive ability and hence managed the affairs of his office in a very satisfactory manner. The promptness with which he discharged his duties had won for him the well-merited esteem of the officers of the company, and he was in a fair way of attaining a still higher position. His greatest weakness—if it may be so called—was a love for fast horses, which often threw him into the company of betting men.
On the morning of the twenty-sixth of April, 1858, the messenger from Atlanta arrived in Montgomery, placed his safe in the office as usual, and when Maroney came in, turned over to him the through pouch.
Maroney unlocked the pouch and compared it with the way-bill, when he discovered a package of four thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars for a party in Montgomery which was not down on the way-bill. About a week after this occurrence, advice was received that a package containing ten thousand dollars in bills of the Planters' and Mechanics' Bank of Charleston, S. C., had been sent to Columbus, Ga., via the Adams Express, but the person to whom it was directed had not received it. Inquiries were at once instituted, when it was discovered that it had been missent, and forwarded to Atlanta, instead of Macon. At Atlanta it was recollected that this package, together with one for Montgomery, for four thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars, had been received on Sunday, the twenty-fifth of April, and had been sent on to Montgomery, whence the Columbus package could be forwarded the next day. Here all trace of the missing package was lost. Maroney stated positively that he had not received it, and the messenger was equally positive that the pouch had been delivered to Maroney in the same order in which he received it from the Atlanta agent.
The officers of the company were completely at a loss. It was discovered beyond a doubt that the package had been sent from Atlanta. The messenger who received it bore an excellent character, and the company could not believe him guilty of the theft. The lock of the pouch was examined and found in perfect order, so that it evidently had not been tampered with. The messenger was positive that he had not left the safe open when he went out of the car, and there was no sign of the lock's having been forced.
The more the case was investigated, the more directly did suspicion point to Maroney, but as his integrity had always been unquestioned, no one now was willing to admit the possibility of his guilt. However, as no decided action in the matter could be taken, it was determined to say nothing, but to have the movements of Maroney and other suspected parties closely watched.
For this purpose various detectives were employed; one a local detective of Montgomery, named McGibony; others from New Orleans, Philadelphia, Mobile, and New York. After a long investigation these parties had to give up the case as hopeless, all concluding that Maroney was an innocent man. Among the detectives, however was one from New York, Robert Boyer, by name, an old and favorite officer of Mr. Matsell when he was chief of the New York police. He had made a long and tedious examination and finding nothing definite as to what had become of the money, had turned his attention to discovering the antecedents of Maroney, but found nothing positively suspicious in his life previous to his entering the employ of the company. He discovered that Maroney was the son of a physician, and that he was born in the town of Rome, Ga.
Here I would remark that the number of titled men one meets in the South is astonishing. Every man, if he is not a doctor, a lawyer, or a clergyman, has some military title—nothing lower than captain being admissible. Of these self-imposed titles they are very jealous, and woe be to the man who neglects to address them in the proper form. Captain is the general title, and is applied indiscriminately to the captain of a steamer, or to the deck hand on his vessel.
Maroney remained in Rome until he became a young man, when he emigrated to Texas. On the breaking out of the Mexican war he joined a company of Texan Rangers, and distinguished himself in a number of battles. At the close of the war he settled in Montgomery, in the year 1851, or 1852, and was employed by Hampton & Co., owners of a line of stages, to act as their agent. On leaving this position, he was made treasurer of Johnson & May's circus, remaining with the company until it was disbanded in consequence of the pecuniary difficulties of the proprietors—caused, it was alleged, through Maroney's embezzlement of the funds, though this allegation proved false, and he remained for many years on terms of intimacy with one of the partners, a resident of Montgomery. When the company disbanded he obtained a situation as conductor on a railroad in Tennessee, and was afterwards made Assistant Superintendent, which position he resigned to take the agency of the Adams Express Company, in Montgomery. His whole life seemed spotless up to the time of the mysterious disappearance of the ten thousand dollars.
In the fall of the year, Maroney obtained leave of absence, and made a trip to the North, visiting the principal cities of the East, and also of the Northwest. He was followed on this trip, but nothing was discovered, with the single exception that his associates were not always such as were desirable in an employé, to whose keeping very heavy interests were from time to time necessarily committed. He was lost sight of at Richmond, Va., for a few days, and was supposed by the man who was following him, to have passed the time in Charleston.
The company now gave up all hope of recovering the money; but as Maroney's habits were expensive, and they had lost, somewhat, their confidence in him, they determined to remove him and place some less objectionable person in his place.
Maroney's passion for fine horses has already been alluded to. It was stated about this time that he owned several fast horses; among others, "Yankee Mary," a horse for which he was said to have paid two thousand five hundred dollars; but as he had brought seven thousand five hundred dollars with him when he entered the employ of the company, this could not be considered a suspicious circumstance.
It having been determined to remove Maroney, the Vice-President of the company wrote to the Superintendent of the Southern Division of the steps he wished taken. The Superintendent of the Southern Division visited Montgomery on the twentieth of January, 1859, but was anticipated in the matter of carrying out his instructions, by Maroney's tendering his resignation. The resignation was accepted, but the superintendent requested him to continue in charge of the office until his successor should arrive.
This he consented to do.
CHAPTER II.
Previous to Maroney's trip to the North, Mr. Boyer held a consultation with the Vice-President and General Superintendent of the company. He freely admitted his inability to fathom the mystery surrounding the loss of the money, and thought the officers of the company did Maroney a great injustice in supposing him guilty of the theft. He said he knew of only one man who could bring out the robbery, and he was living in Chicago.
Pinkerton was the name of the man he referred to. He had established an agency in Chicago, and was doing a large business. He (Boyer) had every confidence in his integrity and ability, which was more than he could say of the majority of detectives, and recommended the Vice-President to have him come down and look into the case.
This ended the case for most of the detectives. One by one they had gone away, and nothing had been developed by them. The Vice-President, still anxious to see if anything could be done, wrote a long and full statement of the robbery and sent it to me, with the request that I would give my opinion on it.
I was much surprised when I received the letter, as I had not the slightest idea who the Vice-President was, and knew very little about the Adams Express, as, at that time, they had no office in the West.
I, however, sat down and read it over very carefully, and, on finishing it, determined to make a point in the case if I possibly could. I reviewed the whole of the Vice-President's letter, debating every circumstance connected with the robbery, and finally ended my consideration of the subject with the firm conviction that the robbery had been committed either by the agent, Maroney, or by the messenger, and I was rather inclined to give the blame to Maroney.
The letter was a very long one, but one of which I have always been proud. Having formed my opinion, I wrote to the Vice-President, explained to him the ground on which I based my conclusions, and recommended that they keep Maroney in their employ, and have a strict watch maintained over his actions.
After sending my letter, I could do nothing until the Vice-President replied, which I expected he would do in a few days; but I heard nothing more of the affair for a long time, and had almost entirely forgotten it, when I received a telegraphic dispatch from him, sent from Montgomery, and worded about as follows:
"Allan Pinkerton: Can you send me a man—half horse and half alligator? I have got 'bit' once more! When can you send him?"
The dispatch came late Saturday night, and I retired to my private office to think the matter over. The dispatch gave me no information from which I could draw any conclusions. No mention was made of how the robbery was committed, or of the amount stolen. I had not received any further information of the ten thousand dollar robbery. How had they settled that? It was hard to decide what kind of a man to send! I wanted to send the very best, and would gladly go myself, but did not know whether the robbery was important enough to demand my personal attention.
I did not know what kind of men the officers of the company were, or whether they would be willing to reward a person properly for his exertions in their behalf.
At that time I had no office in New York, and knew nothing of the ramifications of the company. Besides, I did not know how I would be received in the South. I had held my anti-slavery principles too long to give them up. They had been bred in my bones, and it was impossible to eradicate them. I was always stubborn, and in any circumstances would never abandon principles I had once adopted.
Slavery was in full blossom, and an anti-slavery man could do nothing in the South. As I had always been a man somewhat after the John Brown stamp, aiding slaves to escape, or keeping them employed, and running them into Canada when in danger, I did not think it would do for me to make a trip to Montgomery.
I did not know what steps had already been taken in the case, or whether the loss was a heavy one. From the Vice-President's saying he wanted a man "half horse, half alligator," I supposed he wanted a man who could at least affiliate readily with the inhabitants of the South.
But what class was he to mix with? Did he want a man to mix with the rough element, or to pass among gentlemen? I could select from my force any class of man he could wish. But what did he wish?
I was unaware of who had recommended me to the Vice-President, as at that time I had not been informed that my old friend Boyer had spoken so well of me. What answer should I make to the dispatch? It must be answered immediately!
These thoughts followed each other in rapid succession as I held the dispatch before me.
I finally settled on Porter as the proper man to send, and immediately telegraphed the Vice-President, informing him that Porter would start for Montgomery by the first train. I then sent for Porter and gave him what few instructions I could. I told him the little I knew of the case, and that I should have to rely greatly on his tact and discretion.
Up to that time I had never done any business for the Adams Express, and as their business was well worth having, I was determined to win.
He was to go to Montgomery and get thoroughly acquainted with the town and its surroundings; and as my suspicions had become aroused as to the integrity of the agent, Maroney, he was to form his acquaintance, and frequent the saloons and livery stables of the town, the Vice-President's letter having made me aware of Maroney's inclination for fast horses. He was to keep his own counsel, and, above all things, not let it become known that he was from the North, but to hail from Richmond, Va., thus securing for himself a good footing with the inhabitants. He was also to dress in the Southern style; to supply me with full reports describing the town and its surroundings, the manners and customs of its people, all he saw or heard about Maroney, the messengers and other employés of the company; whether Maroney was married, and, if so, any suspicious circumstances in regard to his wife as well as himself—in fact, to keep me fully informed of all that occurred. I should have to rely on his discretion until his reports were received; but then I could direct him how to act. I also instructed him to obey all orders from the Vice-President, and to be as obliging as possible.
Having given him his instructions, I started him off on the first train, giving him a letter of introduction to the Vice-President. On Porter's arriving in Montgomery he sent me particulars of the case, from which I learned that while Maroney was temporarily filling the position of agent, among other packages sent to the Montgomery office, on the twenty-seventh of January, 1859, were four containing, in the aggregate, forty thousand dollars, of which one, of two thousand five hundred dollars, was to be sent to Charleston, S. C., and the other three, of thirty thousand, five thousand, and two thousand five hundred respectively, were intended for Augusta. These were receipted for by Maroney, and placed in the vault to be sent off the next day. On the twenty-eighth the pouch was given to the messenger, Mr. Chase, and by him taken to Atlanta. When the pouch was opened, it was found that none of these packages were in it, although they were entered on the way-bill which accompanied the pouch, and were duly checked off. The poor messenger was thunder-struck, and for a time acted like an idiot, plunging his hand into the vacant pouch over and over again, and staring vacantly at the way-bill. The Assistant Superintendent of the Southern Division was in the Atlanta office when the loss was discovered, and at once telegraphed to Maroney for an explanation. Receiving no reply before the train started for Montgomery, he got aboard and went directly there. On his arrival he went to the office and saw Maroney, who said he knew nothing at all of the matter. He had delivered the packages to the messenger, had his receipt for them, and of course could not be expected to keep track of them when out of his possession.
Before Mr. Hall, the route agent, left Atlanta he had examined the pouch carefully, but could find no marks of its having been tampered with. He had immediately telegraphed to another officer of the company, who was at Augusta, and advised him of what had happened. The evening after the discovery of the loss the pouch was brought back by the messenger from Atlanta, who delivered it to Maroney.
Maroney took out the packages, compared them with the way-bill, and, finding them all right, he threw down the pouch and placed the packages in the vault.
In a few moments he came out, and going over to where Mr. Hall was standing, near where he had laid down the pouch, he picked it up and proceeded to examine it. He suddenly exclaimed, "Why, it's cut!" and handed it over to Mr. Hall. Mr. Hall, on examination, found two cuts at right angles to each other, made in the side of the pouch and under the pocket which is fastened on the outside, to contain the way-bill.
On Sunday the General Superintendent arrived in Montgomery, when a strict investigation was made, but nothing definite was discovered, and the affair seemed surrounded by an impenetrable veil of mystery. It was, however, discovered that on the day the missing packages were claimed to have been sent away, there were several rather unusual incidents in the conduct of Maroney.
After consultation with Mr. Hall and others, the General Superintendent determined that the affair should not be allowed to rest, as was the ten thousand dollar robbery, and had Maroney arrested, charged with stealing the forty thousand dollars.
The robbery of so large an amount caused great excitement in Montgomery. The legislature was in session, and the city was crowded with senators, representatives and visitors. Everywhere, on the streets, in the saloons, in private families, and at the hotels, the great robbery of the Express Company was the universal topic of conversation. Maroney had become such a favorite that nearly all the citizens sympathized with him, and in unmeasured terms censured the company for having him arrested. They claimed that it was another instance of the persecution of a poor man by a powerful corporation, to cover the carelessness of those high in authority, and thus turn the blame on some innocent person.
Maroney was taken before Justice Holtzclaw, and gave the bail which was required—forty thousand dollars—for his appearance for examination a few days later; prominent citizens of the town actually vieing with one another for an opportunity to sign his bail-bond.
At the examination the Company presented such a weak case that the bail was reduced to four thousand dollars, and Maroney was bound over in that amount to appear for trial at the next session of the circuit court, to be held in June. The evidence was such that there was little prospect of his conviction on the charge unless the company could procure additional evidence by the time the trial was to come off.
It was the desire of the company to make such inquiries, and generally pursue such a course as would demonstrate the guilt or the possible innocence of the accused. It was absolutely necessary for their own preservation to show that depredations upon them could not be committed with impunity. They offered a reward of ten thousand dollars for the recovery of the money, promptly made good the loss of the parties who had entrusted the several amounts to their charge, and looked around to select such persons to assist them as would be most likely to secure success. The amount was large enough to warrant the expenditure of a considerable sum in its recovery, and the beneficial influence following the conviction of the guilty party would be ample return for any outlay securing that object. The General Superintendent therefore telegraphed to me, as before related, requesting me to send a man to work up the case.
CHAPTER III.
Mr. Porter had a very rough journey to Montgomery, and was delayed some days on the road. It was in the depth of winter, and in the North the roads were blockaded with snow, while in the South there was constant rain. The rivers were flooded, carrying away the bridges and washing out the embankments of the railroads, very much impeding travel.
On his arrival in Montgomery he saw the General Superintendent and presented his letter. He received from him the particulars of the forty thousand dollar robbery, and immediately reported them to me.
The General Superintendent directed him to watch—"shadow" as we call it—the movements of Maroney, find out who were his companions, and what saloons he frequented.
Porter executed his duties faithfully, and reported to me that Montgomery was decidedly a fast town; that the Exchange Hotel, where Maroney boarded, was kept by Mr. Floyd, former proprietor of the Briggs House, Chicago, and, although not the leading house of the town, was very much liked, as it was well conducted.
From the meagre reports I had received I found I had to cope with no ordinary man, but one who was very popular, while I was a poor nameless individual, with a profession which most people were inclined to look down upon with contempt. I however did not flinch from the undertaking, but wrote to Porter to do all he could, and at the same time wrote to the General Superintendent, suggesting the propriety of sending another man, who should keep in the background and "spot" Maroney and his wife, or their friends, so that if any one of them should leave town he could follow him, leaving Porter in Montgomery, to keep track of the parties there.
There were, of course, a number of suspicious characters in a town of the size of Montgomery, and it was necessary to keep watch of many of them.
Maroney frequented a saloon kept by a man whom I will call Patterson. Patterson's saloon was the fashionable drinking resort of Montgomery, and was frequented by all the fast men in town. Although outwardly a very quiet, respectable place, inwardly, as Porter found, it was far from reputable. Up stairs were private rooms, in which gentlemen met to have a quiet game of poker; while down stairs could be found the greenhorn, just "roped in," and being swindled, at three card monte. There were, also, rooms where the "young bloods" of the town—as well as the old—could meet ladies of easy virtue. It was frequented by fast men from New Orleans, Mobile, and other places, who were continually arriving and departing.
I advised the General Superintendent that it would be best to have Porter get in with the "bloods" of the town, make himself acquainted with any ladies Maroney or his wife might be familiar with, and adopt generally the character of a fast man.
As soon as the General Superintendent received my letter he telegraphed to me to send the second man, and also requested me to meet him, at a certain date, in New York.
I now glanced over my force to see who was the best person to select for a "shadow". Porter had been promoted by me to be a sort of "roper".
Most people may suppose that nearly any one can perform the duties of a "shadow", and that it is the easiest thing in the world to follow up a man; but such is not the case. A "shadow" has a most difficult position to maintain. It will not do to follow a person on the opposite side of the street, or close behind him, and when he stops to speak to a friend stop also; or if a person goes into a saloon, or store, pop in after him, stand staring till he goes out, and then follow him again. Of course such a "shadow" would be detected in fifteen minutes. Such are not the actions of the real "shadow", or, at least, of the "shadow" furnished by my establishment.
I had just the man for the place, in Mr. Roch, who could follow a person for any length of time, and never be discovered.
Having settled on Roch as the proper man for the position, I summoned him to my private office. Roch was a German. He was about forty-five years old, of spare appearance and rather sallow or tanned complexion. His nose was long, thin and peaked, eyes clear but heavy looking, and hair dark. He was slightly bald, and though he stooped a little, was five feet ten inches in height. He had been in my employ for many years, and I knew him thoroughly, and could trust him.
I informed him of the duties he was to perform, and gave him minute instructions how he was to act. He was to keep out of sight as much as possible in Montgomery. Porter would manage to see him on his arrival, unknown to any one there, and would point out to him Maroney and his wife, and the messenger, Chase, who boarded at the Exchange; also Patterson, the saloon keeper, and all suspected parties. He was not to make himself known to Floyd, of the Exchange, or to McGibony, the local detective. I had also given Porter similar instructions. I suggested to him the propriety of lodging at some low boarding house where liquor was sold.
He was to keep me fully posted by letter of the movements of all suspected parties, and if any of them left town to follow them and immediately inform me by telegraph who they were and where they were going, so that I could fill his place in Montgomery.
Having given him his instructions, I selected for his disguise a German dress. This I readily procured from my extensive wardrobe, which I keep well supplied by frequent attendance at sales of old articles.
When he had rigged himself up in his long German coat, his German cap with the peak behind, and a most approved pair of emigrant boots, he presented himself to me with his long German pipe in his mouth, and I must say I was much pleased with his disguise, in which his own mother would not have recognized him. He was as fine a specimen of a Dutchman as could be found.
Having thoroughly impressed on his mind the importance of the case and my determination to win the esteem of the company by ferreting out the thief, if possible, I started him for Montgomery, where he arrived in due time.
At the date agreed upon I went to New York to meet the General Superintendent. I had never met the gentlemen of the company and I was a little puzzled how to act with them.
I met the Vice-President at the express office, in such a manner that none of the employés were the wiser as to my profession or business, and he made an appointment to meet me at the Astor House in the afternoon. At the Astor House he introduced me to the President, the General Superintendent of the company, and we immediately proceeded to business.
