1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Frank Norris's "The Third Circle" is a compelling narrative that intertwines the themes of love, ambition, and the complexities of human relationships set against the backdrop of early 20th-century society. Recognized for its realism, the text employs a detailed and vivid literary style, reflecting Norris's keen observations of the moral struggles faced by his characters. The work encapsulates the tension between social conventions and personal desires, revealing the depths of human emotion through a masterful use of symbolism and metaphor. As a prominent figure of the American literary naturalism movement, Norris was influenced by the harsh realities of life and its impact on the human psyche. His experiences living in San Francisco and witnessing the socio-economic disparities of the time shaped his views on determinism and human struggle, elements that resonate throughout this poignant tale. Norris's distinct voice and narrative approach invite readers to engage with both the personal and societal dilemmas his characters face, offering a profound commentary on the era's cultural conflicts. "The Third Circle" is a must-read for those interested in the intersections of literature, psychology, and social criticism. It invites readers to explore the intricate dance of desire and conformity, making it a valuable addition to any literary collection. Norris's rich prose and insightful characterizations provide not only an engaging story but also a timeless reflection on the human condition. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
The Third Circle examines how social pressure, desire, and circumstance constrict into a tightening ring that tests what people will compromise, endure, or become. From its opening movement, the book invites readers into a moral and psychological arena where agency is often shadowed by larger forces. Its power lies not in grand gestures but in the steady accumulation of details that make external pressures feel inescapably intimate. The narrative keeps attention fixed on the lived texture of choices, the cost of survival, and the fragile boundary between self-control and surrender, establishing a quietly inexorable momentum that is as unsettling as it is compelling.
A work of fiction by Frank Norris, a central figure in American literary naturalism, The Third Circle emerges from the cultural and economic ferment of the late nineteenth to early twentieth century in the United States. It belongs to a mode of realist writing that foregrounds environment, habit, and material conditions, often treating them as decisive actors in human affairs. The book’s world is recognizably modern in its preoccupation with status, money, and the crosscurrents of urbanizing life. Rather than drawing a romantic tableau, it approaches its subjects with investigative clarity, aligning itself with a tradition that privileges observation, social context, and causal rigor.
Without revealing specific turns, the premise is straightforward and quietly tense: ordinary people are drawn into a closed social orbit where the promise of advancement is inseparable from risk. The work offers a focused, ground-level view of that orbit—what it looks and feels like, how it rewards, and how it exacts. The experience is immersive in a distinctly unsentimental way, privileging the visible facts of behavior, transaction, and consequence. Readers encounter a narrative voice that is alert to patterns and pressures, measured in tone yet relentless in its attention to how small decisions accrete into fate. The mood is restrained, analytic, and charged.
At the thematic core is a naturalist inquiry into causation: how environment shapes character, how appetite is channeled by opportunity, and how institutions normalize what they exploit. The book tracks gradations of belonging and exclusion, observing how reputations are made, spent, and defended. It is attentive to the price of access—what must be traded, what must be concealed—and to the ambiguous comfort of being “inside” a system that also limits. Questions of moral responsibility arise not as abstractions but through the friction of everyday negotiations. The work underscores the tension between self-fashioning and structural constraint, inviting reflection on complicity, resilience, and loss.
Stylistically, The Third Circle favors clarity and compression over ornament, a choice that amplifies the sense of pressure its characters inhabit. Norris’s approach is diagnostic rather than moralizing: scenes unfold with a reporter’s eye for telling detail and a novelist’s instinct for momentum. The prose delineates spaces, routines, and transactions with brisk precision, letting their cumulative logic do the interpretive work. That discipline yields a distinctive rhythm—measured, unsparing, and quietly propulsive. While the surface remains cool, the emotional undertow builds through contrast and repetition, creating a pattern of circling returns that mirrors the title’s image of confinement, attraction, and the difficulty of escape.
For contemporary readers, the book’s relevance is immediate. It interrogates the allure of opportunity in systems that stratify access, a dynamic that echoes in today’s debates about inequality, gatekeeping, and the ethics of ambition. Its attention to status signals, transactional intimacy, and the commodification of time and attention feels strikingly current. By resisting melodrama, the narrative leaves space for readers to weigh cause against choice and chance—questions that animate discussions of work, community, and identity now. The Third Circle thus offers not only a compelling story-world but also a framework for thinking about how people navigate institutions that promise mobility while enforcing delicate, often unforgiving, boundaries.
Approached on its own terms, The Third Circle provides a concentrated encounter with naturalist fiction’s signature concerns, delivered with restraint and narrative control. It is best read attentively, allowing its patterns to emerge through repeated gestures, echoes, and subtle shifts in vantage. The book offers the satisfactions of close observation: a textured sense of place and practice, the hum of routine punctuated by decisive turns, and a sustained curiosity about how ends are pursued and justified. Without revealing outcomes, it prepares readers for a morally complex terrain—neither cynical nor consoling—where understanding grows from patient scrutiny of how lives bend under pressure and how circles, once entered, hold fast.
The Third Circle is a posthumous collection of short fiction by Frank Norris that assembles urban sketches, character studies, and compact dramas largely set in and around San Francisco at the turn of the twentieth century. Written in a naturalist vein, the pieces observe people under pressure from environment, work, and circumstance. The volume’s title signals a descent into zones of the city that lie beyond polite visibility, where survival and appetite set the terms. Across the collection, Norris pairs documentary detail with swift, event-driven plotting, moving from streets and docks to hills and camps, and tracing how different social strata intersect in moments of risk and exchange.
The opening pieces dwell in the crowded lanes of Chinatown and adjacent quarters, following policemen, reporters, and wanderers as they cross thresholds into gambling rooms, apothecaries, and boardinghouses. Scenes revolve around searches, negotiations, and hurried escapes, emphasizing how language barriers, rumor, and spectacle complicate every encounter. These episodes highlight economic arrangements that operate parallel to official institutions, while drawing attention to the staging of exoticism for outsiders. Without revealing outcomes, the stories establish a pattern: a small decision—choosing a door, trusting a guide, trading a coin—triggers consequences that ripple outward, implicating both observers and residents in the same tightly wound urban machinery.
Subsequent tales shift toward the waterfront, where fog, tide tables, and harbor traffic shape human action. Longshoremen compete for loads, small captains bargain for passage, and sailors weigh the cost of desertion against the promise of steady pay. Plots turn on missing manifests, veiled cargo, and the sudden hazards of weather, with characters forced to decide quickly on unstable decks. A recurring emphasis falls on anonymity: men who pass by without names, vessels noted only by silhouette, signals misunderstood at distance. These maritime stories broaden the book’s urban focus, presenting a liminal zone in which law, custom, and opportunity meet in provisional balance.
Other pieces push outward to the hinterland, presenting mining camps, railroad grades, and isolated ranches where scarcity and distance set the terms. Here, claim disputes, broken tools, and a misread survey can reorder lives. Characters confront the mathematics of speculation—how ore assays, freight rates, and water rights decide the fate of labor—and discover that fortune turns on facts often beyond verification. Violence occurs abruptly, but Norris concentrates on the lead-up: a rumor, a delay, a miscount that becomes decisive. By pairing these stories with the city sketches, the collection shows how capital, supplies, and people move between regions, binding disparate settings into one economic field.
Interleaved with these scenes are depictions of professional and bohemian life within the city proper. Newspaper offices, small theaters, and makeshift studios provide stages for ambition and compromise. A reporter chases a scoop through alleys and parlors; an actor balances art against rent; a shopkeeper trades credit for custom. Events hinge on timing—press deadlines, curtain rises, market openings—and on the circulation of information that can elevate or undo reputations. The tone remains observational: motives are clear, outcomes depend on contingencies, and institutions exert quiet pressure. In these pages, success is measured in a day’s receipts, a headline’s placement, or a brief extension of credit.
Norris includes concentrated portraits that spotlight individuals navigating constrained choices, including women whose work and safety depend on informal bargains. A seamstress assesses an offer that solves one problem while creating another; a dancer weighs visibility against risk; a household worker manages obligations within narrow margins. The narratives emphasize calculation rather than melodrama, presenting small negotiations over rent, time, and respect that carry cumulative consequences. Without resolving each dilemma, the stories mark turning points—a letter unanswered, a door closed, a debt restructured—that reorient a life’s path. These character studies complement the larger canvases by showing how broad forces register in daily decisions.
The title piece concentrates the book’s central image: a figurative inner ring of the city where appetite, secrecy, and profit converge. A curious outsider, a go-between, or a minor operator crosses an unseen boundary and discovers a different scale of risk. Key scenes occur in rooms without windows, on stairways, and in curtained booths, emphasizing enclosure and proximity. The turning point is not a spectacle but a recognition—of what participation requires and what withdrawal costs. Without disclosing resolutions, the narrative situates its protagonist among intermediaries who translate between worlds, underscoring the collection’s recurring concern with thresholds, mediation, and the price of access to hidden markets.
Later selections return to familiar districts to register aftermaths: debts come due, alliances shift, and routines resume with adjustments. Endings tend toward restraint rather than catharsis, closing on images that imply continuation—a shop reopened, a berth reassigned, a street swept at dawn. The cumulative effect is cyclical, suggesting that individual episodes join a larger rhythm governed by supply, demand, and chance. By arranging stories that echo across settings—harbor to hillside, alley to office—the book presents a mosaic whose pieces reinforce one another. The final pages do not moralize; they tally results, leaving readers to note how gains and losses distribute under prevailing conditions.
Taken together, The Third Circle maps the contact zones of a growing West Coast city and its hinterland, illustrating how environment, capital, and habit shape conduct across classes and trades. The collection’s method blends reportage with narrative compression, favoring concrete details and event-focused sequences over explicit commentary. Its central message is structural rather than personal: outcomes follow from position, opportunity, and constraint within interlocking systems. While anchored in a specific time and place, the book’s emphasis on intermediaries, thresholds, and the costs of entry clarifies its title image. It delineates a social ring beyond polite view, where necessities and desires transact under their own rules.
Frank Norris’s The Third Circle is rooted in San Francisco during the late Gilded Age, roughly the 1880s through the very early 1900s, when the city was a Pacific entrepôt and a crucible of ethnic segregation, labor conflict, and spectacular vice. The city’s population grew from 233,959 (1880) to 342,782 (1900), crowding its downtown streets, cable car lines, and waterfront. Chinatown, housing roughly fourteen thousand residents by 1890, sat cordoned within a few blocks north of Market Street, while the Barbary Coast thrived as a red-light and entertainment district. The collection’s urban settings reflect this compressed geography of commerce, poverty, and surveillance, a world Norris knew from his San Francisco journalism in the 1890s.
Anti-Chinese agitation and exclusion legislation formed the dominant political environment shaping the neighborhoods Norris portrays. California’s Sand Lot movement (1877), led by Denis Kearney and the Workingmen’s Party, mobilized mass rallies in San Francisco that popularized the slogan “The Chinese must go!” and pushed for restrictive measures. The Page Act (1875) curtailed the immigration of Chinese women; the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) halted the immigration of Chinese laborers; the Scott Act (1888) barred reentry by Chinese residents who traveled abroad; and the Geary Act (1892) extended exclusion and imposed internal registration requirements under threat of deportation. In Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), originating from San Francisco’s discriminatory laundry ordinances, the U.S. Supreme Court held that equal protection applies to noncitizens and that discriminatory enforcement is unconstitutional, a landmark ruling amid pervasive prejudice. Nevertheless, municipal policing and federal administrative practices continued to confine Chinese residents to segregated spaces. In 1902, Congress renewed and extended exclusion, ensnaring Chinese subjects across the new American Pacific empire. These statutes, paired with local harassment and vigilante threats, created a tightly policed enclave economy—restaurants, laundries, import shops, and boarding houses concentrated within Chinatown—and normalized raids on opium dens and meeting halls. The Third Circle reflects this regime by depicting the social isolation, economic marginality, and constant surveillance experienced by Chinese immigrants and their neighbors. Norris’s San Francisco reporting supplied him with street-level observation of the city’s exclusionary geography, and the stories mirror the legal structures and political rhetoric that produced it, translating statutes and riots into lived constraints and fraught encounters in alleys, basements, and boarding rooms.
The period’s Tong Wars, bouts of violent conflict among Chinese associations in San Francisco, became a durable public spectacle from the late 1880s into the early 1900s. Organizations such as the Hop Sing and Suey Sing tongs competed for protection rackets and control of vice, while newspaper magnates, notably the San Francisco Examiner, sensationalized “highbinder” and “hatchet man” narratives. Police raids under prominent detectives like Isaiah W. Lees targeted suspected gunmen and gambling parlors. The book’s fascination with clandestine societies, coded loyalties, and sudden street violence echoes this atmosphere. Norris draws on the city’s climate of fear and spectacle to frame Chinatown as both stage and battleground under relentless public scrutiny.
Opium culture and law enforcement also marked the milieu. San Francisco enacted ordinances against opium dens as early as 1875; California followed with state measures in the 1880s, and the federal Smoking Opium Exclusion Act (1909) later prohibited importation for non-medicinal smoking. Although The Third Circle predates the 1909 statute, crackdowns were frequent in the 1890s, with police and health officials raiding cellar rooms and clubhouses where smokers congregated. The collection’s recurrent images of nocturnal interiors, guarded thresholds, and transactions at the edge of legality align with the city’s campaign against opium dens. Norris uses these settings to show how morality, commerce, and policing overlapped in managing immigrant vice.
Labor conflict on the waterfront culminated in the 1901 City Front strike, when longshoremen and teamsters in San Francisco challenged shipowners and the city’s powerful employers’ associations. Street clashes, strikebreaking, and arbitration battles revealed how the port’s prosperity depended on precarious labor. The political aftershock helped propel union-aligned candidates, including the Union Labor Party’s Eugene Schmitz, to city office in late 1901. The Third Circle’s portrayals of day laborers, draymen, and casual workers echo tensions from these confrontations. By staging hustlers, small proprietors, and wage hands in the same urban circuits, Norris exposes the tight coupling of maritime trade, working-class volatility, and municipal power.
The Panic of 1893 and its prolonged depression intensified urban poverty across the West. Bank failures, railroad bankruptcies, and mass unemployment generated breadlines and displaced families in San Francisco. The political fallout reached the 1896 election, pitting William Jennings Bryan’s silver platform against William McKinley’s gold standard, while populist and labor activism swelled. Relief societies, settlement projects, and private charity attempted to fill gaps in public provision. The Third Circle resonates with this backdrop through characters forced into improvised trades, informal credit, and desperate bargains. Economic shocks function less as headlines than as continuous pressure, shaping choices and outcomes on streets, docks, and boardinghouses.
Public health panic crystallized in the 1900 bubonic plague outbreak in San Francisco’s Chinatown. After the first confirmed case in March 1900, officials from the Marine Hospital Service, including Joseph Kinyoun, imposed quarantines and inoculation regimes. Governor Henry Gage resisted acknowledging plague, fearing economic damage, while federal courts—most notably Jew Ho v. Williamson (1900)—struck down a discriminatory cordon of Chinatown as unconstitutional. Under Rupert Blue (1903–1904), rat control and sanitation improved, and the epidemic was contained. The Third Circle channels the period’s medicalized suspicion of Chinese spaces, showing how disease rhetoric legitimated surveillance, boundary-making, and unequal exposure to state coercion.
As social and political critique, the book exposes the stratified urban order that exclusion laws, labor conflicts, vice economies, and health policies jointly produced. It shows immigrant neighborhoods as overpoliced yet underserved, their residents treated as problems to be managed rather than citizens to be protected. By juxtaposing waterfront capital with precarious labor, and respectable facades with backroom economies, the work indicts a city that monetized vice while disclaiming responsibility for its human costs. Its Chinatown scenes reveal how law and sensational journalism naturalized segregation and fear. In tracing the collision of law, commerce, and survival, the book critiques the era’s tolerance for racialized inequality and municipal complicity.
It used to be my duty, as sub editor of the old San Francisco Wave, to "put the paper to bed." We were printing a Seattle edition in those days of the Alaskan gold rush; and the last form had to be locked up on Tuesday night, that we might reach the news stands by Friday. Working short-handed, as all small weeklies do, we were everlastingly late with copy or illustrations or advertisements; and that Tuesday usually stretched itself out into Wednesday. Most often, indeed, the foreman and I pounded the last quoin into place at four or five o'clock Wednesday morning and went home with the milk-wagons—to rise at noon and start next week's paper going.
For Yelton, most patient and cheerful of foremen, those Tuesday night sessions meant steady work. I, for my part, had only to confer with him now and then on a "Caption" or to run over a late proof. In the heavy intervals of waiting, I killed time and gained instruction by reading the back files of the Wave, and especially that part of the files which preserved the early, prentice work of Frank Norris.
He was a hero to us all in those days, as he will ever remain a heroic memory—that unique product of our Western soil, killed, for some hidden purpose of the gods, before the time of full blossom. He had gone East but a year since to publish the earliest in his succession of rugged, virile novels—"Moran of the Lady Letty," "McTeague," "Blix," "A Man's Woman," "The Octopus," and "The Pit." The East was just beginning to learn that he was great; we had known it long before. With a special interest, then, did I, his humble cub successor as sub editor and sole staff writer, follow that prentice work of his from the period of his first brief sketches, through the period of rough, brilliant short stories hewed out of our life in the Port of Adventures, to the period of that first serial which brought him into his own.
It was a surpassing study of the novelist in the making. J. O'Hara Cosgrave, owner, editor and burden-bearer of the Wave, was in his editing more an artist than a man of business. He loved "good stuff"; he could not bear to delete a distinctive piece of work just because the populace would not understand. Norris, then, had a free hand. Whatever his thought of that day, whatever he had seen with the eye of his flash or the eye of his imagination, he might write and print. You began to feel him in the files of the year 1895, by certain distinctive sketches and fragments. You traced his writing week by week until the sketches became "Little Stories of the Pavements." Then longer stories, one every week, even such stories as "The Third Circle," "Miracle Joyeaux," and "The House with the Blinds"; then, finally, a novel, written feuilleton fashion week by week—"Moran of the Lady Letty." A curious circumstance attended the publication of "Moran" in the Wave. I discovered it myself during those Tuesday night sessions over the files; and it illustrates how this work was done. He began it in the last weeks of 1897, turning it out and sending it straight to the printer as part of his daily stint. The Maine was blown up February 14, 1898. In the later chapters of "Moran," he introduced the destruction of the Maine as an incident! It was this serial, brought to the attention of McClure's Magazine, which finally drew Frank Norris East.
"The studio sketches of a great novelist," Gellett Burgess has called these ventures and fragments. Burgess and I, when the Wave finally died of too much merit, stole into the building by night and took away one set of old files. A harmless theft of sentiment, we told ourselves; for by moral right they belonged to us, the sole survivors in San Francisco of those who had helped make the Wave. And, indeed, by this theft we saved them from the great fire of 1906. When we had them safe at home, we spent a night running over them, marveling again at those rough creations of blood and nerve which Norris had made out of that city which was the first love of his wakened intelligence, and in which, so wofully soon afterward, he died.
I think that I remember them all, even now; not one but a name or a phrase would bring back to mind. Most vividly, perhaps, remains a little column of four sketches called "Fragments." One was a scene behind the barricades during the Commune—a gay flaneur of a soldier playing on a looted piano until a bullet caught him in the midst of a note. Another pictured an empty hotel room after the guest had left. Only that; but I always remember it when I first enter my room in a hotel. A third was the nucleus for the description of the "Dental Parlors" in McTeague. A fourth, the most daring of all, showed a sodden workman coming home from his place of great machines. A fresh violet lay on the pavement. He, the primal brute in harness, picked it up. Dimly, the aesthetic sense woke in him. It gave him pleasure, a pleasure which called for some tribute. He put it between his great jaws and crushed it—the only way he knew.
Here collected are the longest and most important of his prentice products. Even without those shorter sketches whose interest is, after all, mainly technical, they are an incomparable study in the way a genius takes to find himself. It is as though we saw a complete collection of Rembrandt's early sketches, say—full technique and co-ordination not yet developed, but all the basic force and vision there. Admirable in themselves, these rough-hewn tales, they are most interesting when compared with the later work which the world knows, and when taken as a melancholy indication of that power of growth which was in him and which must have led, if the masters of fate had only spared him, to the highest achievement in letters.
WILL IRWIN. March, 1909.
There are more things in San Francisco's Chinatown than are dreamed of in Heaven and earth. In reality there are three parts of Chinatown—the part the guides show you, the part the guides don't show you, and the part that no one ever hears of. It is with the latter part that this story has to do. There are a good many stories that might be written about this third circle of Chinatown, but believe me, they never will be written—at any rate not until the "town" has been, as it were, drained off from the city, as one might drain a noisome swamp, and we shall be able to see the strange, dreadful life that wallows down there in the lowest ooze of the place—wallows and grovels there in the mud and in the dark. If you don't think this is true, ask some of the Chinese detectives (the regular squad are not to be relied on), ask them to tell you the story of the Lee On Ting affair, or ask them what was done to old Wong Sam, who thought he could break up the trade in slave girls, or why Mr. Clarence Lowney (he was a clergyman from Minnesota who believed in direct methods) is now a "dangerous" inmate of the State Asylum—ask them to tell you why Matsokura, the Japanese dentist, went back to his home lacking a face—ask them to tell you why the murderers of Little Pete will never be found, and ask them to tell you about the little slave girl, Sing Yee, or—no, on the second thought, don't ask for that story.
The tale I am to tell you now began some twenty years ago in a See Yup restaurant on Waverly Place—long since torn down—where it will end I do not know. I think it is still going on. It began when young Hillegas and Miss Ten Eyck (they were from the East, and engaged to be married) found their way into the restaurant of the Seventy Moons, late in the evening of a day in March. (It was the year after the downfall of Kearney and the discomfiture of the sand-lotters.)
"What a dear, quaint, curious old place!" exclaimed Miss Ten Eyck.
She sat down on an ebony stool with its marble seat, and let her gloved hands fall into her lap, looking about her at the huge hanging lanterns, the gilded carven screens, the lacquer work, the inlay work, the coloured glass, the dwarf oak trees growing in Satsuma pots, the marquetry, the painted matting, the incense jars of brass, high as a man's head, and all the grotesque jim-crackery of the Orient. The restaurant was deserted at that hour. Young Hillegas pulled up a stool opposite her and leaned his elbows on the table, pushing back his hat and fumbling for a cigarette.
"Might just as well be in China itself," he commented.
"Might?" she retorted; "we are in China, Tom—a little bit of China dug out and transplanted here. Fancy all America and the Nineteenth Century just around the corner! Look! You can even see the Palace Hotel from the window. See out yonder, over the roof of that temple—the Ming Yen, isn't it?—and I can actually make out Aunt Harriett's rooms."
