0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Abenteuer, Thriller, Horror
- Sprache: Englisch
William Le Queux's "The Under-Secretary" is a riveting exploration of political intrigue and espionage at the turn of the 20th century. Through its gripping narrative, Le Queux masterfully weaves elements of adventure and suspense, presenting a richly detailed portrayal of the diplomatic maneuvering prevalent during a time of heightened international tensions. The novel exemplifies Le Queux's characteristic style, merging vivid descriptions with fast-paced storytelling, thereby immersing readers in a world where loyalties are tested, and secrets reign supreme. Situating this work within the larger context of early espionage fiction, it reflects the societal anxieties of the Edwardian era, marked by the increasing prominence of intelligence agencies and the shadow of war looming over Europe. A highly prolific writer and journalist, William Le Queux was deeply entrenched in the issues of his time, often engaging in discussions on militarism and foreign policy, thereby influencing his writing. His personal experiences, including his connections to espionage and diplomatic circles, informed the vivid portrayal of characters and their motivations in "The Under-Secretary." Le Queux's adept understanding of the complexities of governance and security makes this novel not only entertaining but also a sharp critique of the political systems of the day. For readers seeking a thought-provoking exploration of themes such as loyalty, betrayal, and the moral ambiguities of power, "The Under-Secretary" stands as a compelling recommendation. Its intricate plot and well-drawn characters will captivate enthusiasts of historical fiction and espionage alike, making it an essential read for anyone interested in the intricate web of political machinations during a pivotal era. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
The Under-Secretary
Table of Contents
Introduction
At its core, The Under-Secretary turns on the fraught intersection of state power and private conscience, tracing how the mechanisms of government—discretion, hierarchy, and ambition—can entangle a single official in webs of secrecy, loyalty, and public scrutiny, and how the smallest misstep within those corridors can ripple outward into diplomatic stakes, personal peril, and the persistent question of what integrity can mean when duty to the nation, allegiance to colleagues, and responsibility to truth seem to pull in opposing directions with consequences far beyond any office door.
The Under-Secretary is a novel by William Le Queux, a British writer and journalist renowned for popular fiction about intrigue and international tension from the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century. Published around the turn of the twentieth century, it arises from a period marked by growing anxiety about espionage, bureaucratic expansion, and the influence of the press on politics. While Le Queux’s settings vary across his work, the book situates readers within the machinery of officialdom and the social circles orbiting it, aligning with contemporary tastes for narratives that peer behind the doors of ministries and private clubs.
Without giving plot specifics, the premise centers on the pressures and vulnerabilities attached to the titular position: proximity to confidential information, competing demands from superiors and rivals, and the risk that personal life and public role will collide. Readers encounter a narrative calibrated for momentum and tension, moving from quiet conversations to sudden revelations with economy and purpose. The book offers a period thriller’s satisfactions—mystery, suspicion, reversal—while maintaining a focus on the human cost borne by individuals tasked with navigating policy, protocol, and the unpredictable weather of political favor.
Le Queux writes in a direct, reportorial manner shaped by his background in journalism, favoring crisp scenes, clear stakes, and a steady escalation of complications. His tone marries worldly skepticism with dramatic flourish, creating an atmosphere in which whispered hints can matter as much as formal declarations. The pacing reflects the popular press and serial storytelling traditions of his era, delivering short, pointed episodes that accumulate into a larger portrait of intrigue. Dialogue tends toward urgency and implication, and descriptive detail attends to manners and small signals of status that define, and sometimes betray, character.
Thematically, The Under-Secretary invites reflection on the friction between duty and desire, the mutable boundaries of loyalty, and the ethics of secrecy in public life. It examines how information is acquired, withheld, traded, and weaponized, and how reputations can be remade overnight by rumor or revelation. Questions of class, patronage, and access run beneath the surface, as do anxieties about foreign influence and the limits of national control. At the same time, the narrative entertains moral ambiguity: good intentions coexist with self-interest, and clear villains recede, replaced by networks of incentives that nudge people toward compromise.
For contemporary readers, the novel’s value lies as much in its lens on a historical mindset as in its suspense: it captures popular British preoccupations with administrative power, media influence, and shadowy diplomacy during a time of accelerating global rivalry. Its questions echo today—how to balance transparency and security, how careers bend under public pressure, how truth competes with narrative—making it a resonant companion to current debates about governance and information. Read alongside modern political fiction, it highlights continuities in technique and concern, even as its period detail supplies the distinctive textures of an earlier political world.
Approached on its own terms, The Under-Secretary offers the pleasures of a compact, high-stakes story set against the scaffold of government, delivered with the clarity and urgency that made William Le Queux a mainstay of popular fiction. It rewards readers who enjoy institutional settings, character-driven suspense, and the interplay between personal risk and public responsibility. Whether one comes for the atmosphere of official rooms and private parlors, for the mechanics of intrigue, or for a study of how power feels from just below the top, the book provides an engaging, historically revealing journey without requiring specialist knowledge.
Synopsis
The Under-Secretary follows a tense episode in Edwardian politics, focusing on a junior minister at the Foreign Office whose routine duties abruptly intersect with clandestine threats. The narrative opens amid London’s social season, where public receptions and private consultations reveal the delicate balance of diplomacy. A confidential paper concerning a sensitive negotiation becomes the hinge on which careers and national interests turn. A first-person associate, drawn into the minister’s confidence, frames the action from close quarters without commanding it, allowing the political machinery, the press, and continental figures to come into view as suspicion and rumor begin to encircle the department.
An unexpected disappearance at a late-hour conference sparks the plot. A dispatch believed to be secure goes missing, followed by a cryptic warning that places the Under-Secretary under immediate scrutiny. Discretion is vital; a scandal would jeopardize a pending agreement and could be read as weakness abroad. Meanwhile, a woman with ambiguous loyalties offers information at a private meeting, raising questions the minister cannot ignore. The story establishes the stakes briskly: a single document might tilt a diplomatic balance, and any misstep could trigger parliamentary uproar. The protagonists embark on discreet inquiries, careful to leave no trace of official involvement.
Early efforts focus on the city’s familiar spaces: a gentleman’s club, a discreet solicitor’s office, and an embassy drawing-room where the line between hospitality and intelligence-gathering blurs. Minor officials and messengers are interviewed, alibis tested, and a chain of custody reconstructed. Hints of continental agents surface, neither confirmed nor dismissed, while a newspaper editor fishes for a lead. The Under-Secretary attempts to proceed through regular channels, yet the pace of events makes a quiet resolution unlikely. The narrator’s vantage highlights how swiftly private anxieties can become public crises, and how personal loyalties compete with the demands of office.
Clues tug the search across the Channel, tracing a discreet path through Parisian cafes and Brussels hotels. Meetings are arranged under innocuous pretexts; a folded letter passes hands at a railway buffet; a ciphered note, cautiously decoded, suggests both opportunity and trap. The investigators weigh paying for the return of state property against emboldening those who trade in secrets. Rival watchers appear and then dissolve into the crowd, leaving only impressions of pursuit. The narrative juxtaposes the lighted boulevards with shadowed entryways, underscoring how the public face of diplomacy depends on unpublicized errands and the willingness to act without acknowledgment.
Midway, the inquiry exposes inconsistencies closer to home. An associate’s movements do not align, and a routine communication bears marks of tampering. A second attempt to obtain the missing material ends in a narrow escape, suggesting that several interests, not one, contend for it. The Under-Secretary must weigh personal trust against circumstantial evidence while a committee seeks explanations he cannot provide. In this portion, codes, concealed compartments, and discreet couriers illustrate the practical mechanics of espionage. The risk evolves from embarrassment to possible diplomatic rupture, with the prospect that a single sentence in a private memorandum could ignite a broader quarrel.
Back in London, parliamentary pressure intensifies. Questions are tabled, leaks are rumored, and the margin for delay shrinks. A country-house gathering, arranged under social pretenses, offers a venue where parties to the intrigue might converge. The narrative compresses time: a rendezvous at dusk, a midnight errand through wet gardens, and a dawn train toward the coast. Documents are glimpsed rather than held, and whispered assurances compete with sudden reversals. Each scene emphasizes the discipline required of an official who must act decisively while remaining answerable to colleagues who cannot be fully informed, and to an electorate that expects both candor and results.
A confrontation reveals that the plot extends beyond a single theft, drawing on financial distress, political ambition, and deft exploitation of society’s intersections with statecraft. The instigators’ method, rather than their names, is placed in view: the targeting of intermediaries, the sowing of doubt, and the staged appearance of scandal to force concessions. A partial confession clarifies the chain of events without fully dispelling the risk. By centering on procedure rather than sensational revelation, the account maintains focus on the stakes of governance. The Under-Secretary’s role remains constrained by duty, yet his resolve defines the response to the unfolding crisis.
The final movement races toward administrative containment and diplomatic repair. A critical item is recovered or neutralized in circumstances that demand quiet success rather than public triumph. The government averts immediate consequences, though the file remains heavier with annotations and cautions. Limited disclosures satisfy procedural oversight without inflaming the situation. Personal costs register in strained associations and the recognition that future negotiations will proceed under sharper watch. The narrative concludes with restored equilibrium in outward affairs, while acknowledging that such stability depends on continuous, unseen labor and the readiness to meet similar challenges with the same measured firmness.
Overall, The Under-Secretary presents a portrait of public service under pressure, where national interests turn on precise choices made discreetly and fast. It emphasizes the interplay between private motives and public duties, the speed at which rumor can shape policy, and the necessity for vigilance when diplomacy intersects with covert rivalry. Without dwelling on sensational detail, the story conveys how governance relies on trust calibrated by evidence, and how reputations must withstand scrutiny in an age of agile communications. Its message is one of duty sustained under strain, and of political order preserved by alert minds working behind the scenes.
Historical Context
William Le Queux situates The Under-Secretary in the high-stakes milieu of London government at the turn of the twentieth century, when the British Empire was at once confident and precariously exposed. The likely setting is Edwardian Whitehall and Westminster—corridors of the Foreign Office and Home Office, cabinet ante-rooms, and the clubland of Pall Mall—interlaced with embassies, press offices, and telegraph rooms. The time frame evokes a world of coded cables, expanding telephone networks, fast trains, and a press capable of manufacturing national alarm overnight. London’s cosmopolitan streets, from Mayfair to docklands, provide a stage where imperial policy, espionage anxieties, and social hierarchy converge and collide.
The Second Boer War (1899–1902) shaped British politics and official culture that Le Queux mirrors: early shocks during “Black Week” (Stormberg, Magersfontein, Colenso, December 1899) prompted scrutiny of military preparedness. Under Lords Roberts and Kitchener, Britain shifted to counter-guerrilla methods—blockhouses, scorched-earth tactics, and concentration camps—leading to civilian deaths (about 26,000 Boer women and children; many Black Africans also perished). The 1902 Treaty of Vereeniging ended the conflict but left moral and administrative questions lingering at home. Reforms followed, including the Committee of Imperial Defence (1902) and the Esher reforms (1904). The Under-Secretary reflects this postwar fixation on coordination, secrecy, and intelligence as instruments of state power and political survival.
The most decisive context is the Anglo-German rivalry and the attendant spy panic that crested between 1898 and 1914. Germany’s Naval Laws (1898 and 1900), engineered by Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz, launched a battleship program challenging Britain’s two-power standard. Britain responded with Admiral Sir John Fisher’s reforms and HMS Dreadnought (1906), which revolutionized naval warfare and intensified budgetary and strategic pressure. The arms race fed a press-driven culture of vigilance: Lord Northcliffe’s Daily Mail sensationalized invasion scenarios, and public lectures and novels popularized the fear of clandestine German networks along the east and south coasts. The government expanded legal and institutional tools. The Secret Service Bureau was established in 1909 with Captain Vernon Kell (home section, later MI5) and Captain Mansfield Cumming (foreign section, later MI6). The Official Secrets Act 1911 strengthened penalties for transmitting official information. Port towns, dockyards, and naval bases—Portsmouth, Chatham, and Harwich—became the imagined terrain of espionage and sabotage. Le Queux, a journalist-novelist with a flair for reportage, actively campaigned with Lord Roberts and the National Service League to promote national preparedness and universal training. His invasion-scare and espionage fictions (notably The Invasion of 1910 and Spies of the Kaiser) were serialized and marketed to shape public opinion about security vulnerabilities. The Under-Secretary draws from this ecosystem: it dramatizes ministerial exposure to leaks, the fragility of cabinet solidarity under press scrutiny, and the danger of foreign manipulation of official correspondence. By staging whispered conferences, intercepted telegrams, and the pressure of the gallery and the lobby, the book absorbs the era’s concrete institutions—the new intelligence bureau, the widened secrecy laws, the naval race—into a narrative about how an imperial capital can be destabilized from within as much as threatened from without.
A wave of anarchist violence and revolutionary conspiracies across Europe forms another historical stratum. High-profile assassinations—Empress Elisabeth of Austria (1898), King Umberto I of Italy (1900), and U.S. President William McKinley (1901)—stoked fears of transnational extremist cells. In Britain, Special Branch (formed in 1883) tracked Irish republican and anarchist networks, while the Aliens Act 1905 introduced immigration controls partly in response to radical ferment. The Siege of Sidney Street in London (January 1911) dramatized the menace of armed foreign militants in urban settings. Le Queux’s narrative atmosphere of surveillance, infiltration, and cosmopolitan intrigue echoes this climate, portraying London’s ministries as vulnerable to ideologues as well as professional spies.
Diplomatic tensions with Russia in Central Asia—the “Great Game”—and their resolution in the Anglo-Russian Convention (1907) supply crucial diplomatic background. The agreement delineated spheres of influence in Persia (northern Russian, southeastern British, a neutral center), affirmed British interests in Afghanistan, and set constraints in Tibet, easing rivalry after decades of pressure points from the Pamirs to the Persian Gulf. Telegraph lines from St. Petersburg to Tehran and the Indian frontier, and railway projects toward the Caucasus and Central Asia, made cables and couriers strategic assets. The Under-Secretary leverages this milieu: sensitive dispatches, treaty drafts, and embassy gossip become instruments through which continental alignments can be quietly shifted.
The Entente Cordiale (1904) and the Morocco Crises (1905–1906, 1911) created recurrent tests of British diplomacy. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s Tangier visit (1905) challenged French influence, leading to the Algeciras Conference (1906), where Britain backed France. The Agadir Crisis (1911), precipitated by the German gunboat Panther, brought a war scare and triggered David Lloyd George’s Mansion House speech (July 1911) warning against humiliation. Cabinet debates over commitments, naval dispositions, and public messaging intensified. The Under-Secretary reflects these pressures through scenes of hurried consultations, leaks to a volatile press, and the delicate calculus of signaling resolve without accidental escalation.
Domestic political realignments framed official conduct. The Labour Representation Committee (1900) evolved into the Labour Party, while the Liberal landslide of 1906 ushered in social reforms: the Trades Disputes Act (1906), Old Age Pensions (1908), and the People’s Budget (1909). The constitutional crisis produced the Parliament Act (1911), curbing the Lords’ veto. Parallel to social legislation came tighter secrecy (Official Secrets Act 1911) and greater administrative professionalism. The Marconi affair (1912–1913), involving allegations of insider share dealings by ministers including Rufus Isaacs and David Lloyd George, crystallized anxieties about probity and modern communications. The Under-Secretary resonates with these debates, scrutinizing patronage networks, lobbying, and the porous boundary between policy and publicity.
As social and political critique, the book interrogates the price of security in a hierarchical state. It exposes how secrecy can shield incompetence and how class-bound patronage distorts appointments, access, and accountability. By dramatizing leaks, blackmail, and media manipulation, it indicts the collusion of government and press in manufacturing alarm while marginalizing civil liberties. Foreign threats are shown to be inseparable from domestic inequities—over-centralization, unexamined nationalism, and selective justice. The Under-Secretary thus challenges the complacency of imperial governance, warning that fear of the outsider, if unchecked by transparent institutions and ethical leadership, corrodes the very constitutional order it claims to defend.
