To Leave with the Reindeer - Olivia Rosenthal - E-Book

To Leave with the Reindeer E-Book

Olivia Rosenthal

0,0
9,59 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.
Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

To Leave with the Reindeer is the account of a woman who has been trained for a life she cannot live. She readies herself for freedom, and questions its limits, by exploring how humans relate to animals. Rosenthal weaves an intricate pattern, combining the central narrative with many other voices – vets, farmers, breeders, trainers, a butcher – to produce a polyphonic composition full of fascinating and disconcerting insights. Wise, precise, generous, To Leave with the Reindeer takes a clear-eyed look at the dilemmas of domestication, both human and animal, and the price we might pay to break free.

Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:

EPUB
MOBI

Seitenzahl: 204

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



English-language translation first published in 2019 by And Other Stories Sheffield – London – New York www.andotherstories.org

Copyright © Editions Gallimard, 2010

First published as Que font les rennes après Noël? in 2010 by Editions Verticales, Gallimard English-language translation © Sophie Lewis, 2019

Cover photo and inserts © 2005, Mircea Cantor, stills from the film Deeparture

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transported in any form by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the publisher of this book. The right of Olivia Rosenthal to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

This book is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events or places is entirely coincidental.

ISBN: 978-1-911508-42-7 eBook ISBN: 978-1-911508-43-4

Editor: Anna Glendenning; Copy-editor: Gesche Ipsen; Proofreader: Sarah Terry; Typesetting and eBook design: Tetragon, London.

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

This book is supported in part by the Institut français (Royaume-Uni) as part of the Burgess programme (www.frenchbooknews.com), in part by English PEN’s PEN Translates programme (www.englishpen.org), supported by Arts Council England, and in part by public funding from Arts Council England.

Contents

I

II

III

IV

for Phu Si who did not hang himself in his room

‌I

You don’t know if you like animals but you’re desperate to have one, you want a creature. This is one of the first indications of your desire, a desire that’s all the fiercer for remaining unfulfilled.

Tigon, leopon, pumapard, jaglion, tiguar, jagulep, leoger, tigoness, lipard, jagress aren’t only rare words, these are also creatures of flesh and blood, born in breeding centres under the observation and with the assistance of researchers dedicated to ensuring the survival of our great predators. These strange animals can’t be considered truly wild for, strictly speaking, they don’t exist in the natural world and belong to no recorded species. It follows that we must be legally permitted to acquire them. We have to understand nonetheless that to invite one of these specimens into our home is to put ourselves in danger, especially as scientific studies have shown that interspecies offspring frequently demonstrate severe mental problems.

You have been told that you didn’t want to leave your mother’s belly. There are even photos of you sitting proudly between your parent’s legs, head in the air. Your breech position was the first inkling of your wilfulness.

We may wonder what ‘mental problems’ means for an individual resulting from the coupling of a tiger and a lioness, or a tigress and a lion, or a lioness and a leopard, or a leopard and a puma, or a jaguar and a leopardess, or of any other of the multiple combinations for which we can invent new names as required. Observers in daily contact with these creatures may have noted an abnormal tendency to docility among them, which would explain why they are classed with domestic animals and why we can, therefore, welcome them into our homes. With hybrids, everything is possible.

You’ve also been told that you were a magnificent baby, with a smooth head and a round, smiling face, due no doubt to your having been born by Caesarean, which spared you any physical exertion. According to family legend, your natural docility is actually born of indolence.

To find out which animal we have the right to own or tame, we must consult the laws, by-laws, statutes and decrees that differentiate the species, races and subspecies of domestic animals, the wild species, the species under threat of extinction, the wild species threatened with extinction, the protected species, species considered dangerous, and species both dangerous and protected.

You don’t like wild animals. You prefer household animals, ones that live with humans as part of their families: it’s those you want.

Anyone may refer to the statutory documentation to find out if they are violating the law by keeping at home a boa constrictor, a flea, a poison dart frog of the Rivan 92 cross-breed, a yellow-tailed woolly monkey, a Tibetan blue bear or a cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), so charming a companion in its early years that it will jump onto your bed and lick your face before curling up at your feet. Charm is not the decisive criterion for distinguishing the wild from the domestic.

For a long time, you believed that your mother saw Rosemary’s Baby, the Roman Polanski film, while she was pregnant with you. When, years later, you saw the film, you imagined the awful distress she must have experienced awaiting a baby that could have been human or animal.

Can we love what we don’t know, can’t go near, can’t see, can’t touch, what we imagine? Could imagination be the substrate of love?

During the very earliest years of your life, despite your docility and the perfect smoothness of your head, you showed a tendency to risk your life by rocking your cot violently or by bouts of impassioned yelling. Of this period, in which you made your presence felt with an abandon that was not to last, you have no memory.

Some wolveries, in which the trained wolves live behind bars and howl at the smallest incursion by an unfamiliar creature, may contain both wolves and ‘hybrids’. The word ‘hybrid’, used by the trainers to reassure visitors and temper the animals’ apparent ferocity, doesn’t always have the intended effect.

From the age of three, you wanted a pet that would give you a break from human company. You realised that your teddy bear was not a living thing. Kissing him, yanking his ears or pulling out his fur therefore offered only moderate satisfaction.

Everyone loves teddy bears. Many people also love animals. Only, those who use them, live off them, breed them, capture them, sell them, hunt them, kill them, do not speak of love. When it comes to animals, love is a luxury that we may or may not be able to indulge. Not everyone is lucky enough to be able to love animals.

You wish you could be lucky, you wish you could be like everyone else, you wish you could say I love animals. Because when you say that, there’s no need to explain, love itself is enough and exonerates us from the rest. You love animals.

From the age of three, you begged for an animal, a little ball of fur that would be entirely under your sway, in your possession, your control, in your hands, in your power: yours. Your parents refused, deciding that you wouldn’t be ready to look after one, that they’d end up doing the work for you, and you felt, though you couldn’t explain it, that there were deeper motivations behind this categorical refusal.

Undomesticated species are those that have not been modified by means of human selection. In contrast, domesticated species have been subject to a pressure of selection that is constant and ongoing. This pressure has resulted in the formation of a species, i.e. a group of animals which has acquired stable and genetically transmissible features, and which cannot produce fertile offspring with other species.

Rosemary’s Baby tells the story of a woman who has terrible nightmares throughout her pregnancy. As she can’t remember precisely the circumstances that led to her child’s conception, she ends up wondering if her husband could have drugged her and allowed some vile beast to mate with her. You would like to know what effect seeing this film might have had on your mother’s pregnancy.

In legal terminology, ‘fertile issue’ generally refers to the newborn animal, product of the coupling of two other animals, anthropomorphically known as the ‘parents’. When there are no parents, this is because they have been killed or caught by predators, and likewise for humans. For a great many species, it may also occur that the animal is abandoned at birth by its so-called parents, whether because of its non-viability or excessive vulnerability, or on the contrary because it possesses innately and from the first the qualities it needs for independence and survival.

Should animals left to themselves in the wild be considered abandoned or simply independent? So long as abandonment does not become a precondition for independence.

Like many children, more even than to buy a pet you want to rescue an animal born in the wild and abandoned by its parents. Your father scolds you sharply every time you express this desire. You don’t understand his anger. You keep on asking.

In France, before the passage of statute 76-629 on 10 July 1976, which introduced the concepts of environmental heritage and the conservation of species, all fauna and flora were considered res nullius, or belonging to no one. When something belongs to no one, anyone may take possession of it. Once a person has taken possession, this proprietor is responsible for their property, as indicated in Article 1385 of the Civil Code. ‘The proprietor of an animal, or whoever makes use of an animal, is responsible during the period of its use for any damage caused by the animal, whether that animal was in his or her keeping or whether it was lost or had escaped.’

Due to this statute, of which neither your father nor your mother knows the exact terms but which they apply by intuition, you may not rescue any animal, abandoned or otherwise. Should you do that, you would become responsible for it, which, it’s agreed, you’re not ready for. At four years old, there is, it seems, no responsibility you may take on.

The world is a fabric of words; we are completely sheltered and sustained by the simultaneously coercive and maternal resources of the text.

You need your parents. You could die in your sleep, by choking, by putting your fingers into sockets, by spilling a bowl of hot water, by handling blunt instruments, by toppling from an open window, by falling into a pool, you are at risk, you have to be watched night and day, accidents happen so quickly, you are under the meticulous surveillance of your parents.

Wolveries are mostly established far from towns so that the wolves’ howling does not disturb local people. The trainers, however, must live in close proximity to the kennels, in part to keep track of their animals’ comings and goings, and in part because all training demands continual contact with the creatures one is meant to be training.

The howls you emit in the first years of your life have left no trace in your memory. Instead, you have a crystal-clear recollection of the fear you read in your mother’s eyes when you used to go on all fours under the bed, or tried to hide, to escape her gaze.

There are no wild animals, there are only protected animals.

You have no experience of animals, no contact with them at all. You occasionally see them in elaborately produced films that expertly frame faces, eyes, tufts of fur, muzzles, tongues, ears, teeth, but thereby cause you to miss what’s most important: the sensation and the scale of them. You miss the scale, you miss the smell, you miss the fear, you miss the sense of comparison and difference, you restrict yourself, you separate yourself, you confine yourself to those you know, you are surrounded by people who are like you. Instead of being surrounded by animals, you are surrounded by people like you.

I knew nothing about big cats, I was scraping hulls, sinking stone blocks into the seabed, I was a deepwater diver. I was spending six or seven hours at a time in the swell, I was heartily sick of it, and one day a kid I knew offered me work with some big cats. I passed a few tests the following week, I was hired, I began as a handler in a zoo, under the guidance of a trainer who showed me the ropes and, after six months, I must’ve had a feel for it, the boss told me this afternoon lose the overalls and take this whip, put your hand on my shoulder, now you follow me like my shadow, you’re my guardian angel but you keep your trap shut, we’re going into the cage together.

You love animals and you also love your mother. However, your mother does not love animals. You ask her why, why doesn’t she love animals, everyone loves them, why isn’t she like everyone else, you would like her, your mother, to be like everyone else, for her to look after tiny birds fallen from their nests, for her to teach them to fly, for her to rescue dogs abandoned in the woods, to feed wandering cats, to pick up hedgehogs and badgers on the roads, to bottle-feed fawns whose parents have been killed in the hunt, but your mother does not see things in the same light, she has enough to do for her own children without taking on the rest of the world’s suffering, and if she did all of that, she wouldn’t be your mother, the one you love more than anything in spite of her indifference to animals, she doesn’t seem troubled by your demands, her confidence is such that you think she must be right: you love animals but you prefer your mother.

There’s no mystery in it, to raise well-behaved animals you have to start with the babies. It depends a bit on what you want to do with them, but to make them work, you have to separate them from their mother very early and bottle-feed them yourself.

As a child, you don’t speculate as to what profession you will choose, what kind of life you’ll lead, where you’ll live, what friends you’ll have, when you’ll die, what lovers you’ll reject; your mother is your life, your profession, your home, your friend, your lover and everything else.

In the Justinian Code, we learn that things belonging to no one and which come under human jurisdiction may be acquired by occupancy; among these are wild animals, fish and all the other animals that live in the air, on the ground or in the sea, for natural logic has it that whatever belongs to no one may belong to whomever takes it in hand.

In the first years of your life, you think your mother owns you. Sometimes, you’re sorry about this.

As I couldn’t work with wolves in the beginning because you need a certificate, I started with a sheepdog. I was an alpine chasseur, I did mountain rescue. After that I got myself some Czech wolfhounds: ferocious, hard-as-nails hybrids, originally bred to guard prisoners in the Gulags and trained to attack all who try to leave the territory.

You do not attempt to leave the territory. Since learning to walk, you submit to your parents’ wishes almost without complaint, you are unusually docile, unusually gentle, unusually affectionate, yet your pathological insistence that they procure the presence of a pet at your side goes on. Your parents refuse point-blank. You decide, in your own way, to defy them.

For the canine and feline species, there is a unique genealogical register in which each breed and every one of its representatives are catalogued and described. Divided into as many sections as there are breeds, this register is compiled by certified associations which define each breed’s standards and which assign specimens submitted to them to one or another section according to both physical and behavioural criteria. In order to have your dog or cat join the register, you have only to prove that both of its parents are themselves registered. If this is not the case, there remains the option for your animal to take a test known as the confirmation test. During this test, the candidate is presented to the associations and examined by them. If it fulfils the criteria for belonging to a given breed, it can be ‘confirmed’. This confirmation means the candidate may join the register, and its progeny too, on condition that the latter be conceived with a partner of the same breed.

You look awfully like your father, they keep on telling you. You get angry, you think that this physical resemblance shouldn’t stop you, should the moment arise, from resisting him.

These are a couple of white she-wolves. They’ve come straight from Germany, via Belgium, that’s always been the hub for buying and selling wild animals. I didn’t buy them, that’s illegal, I exchanged them for another pair of beasts. As I’m taming them, I spend time in the cage every day, I sit in the same place, I wear the same clothes, I make the same gestures, I wait for them to come to me and, when they’re right up close, I hold my hand out to them, fist always closed so they won’t attack my fingers, you never know, they’re still dangerous, and I say exactly the same words so they’ll get used to my voice.

You don’t scream as you used to, you no longer poke your fingers into sockets, you don’t turn the knobs on the oven, you don’t tip over kettles and vases any more, either. You’ve grown used to your mother’s gaze, your mother’s voice, your mother’s smile, to your mother’s orders. But you now have the words for asking, for protesting, for demanding. You want an animal. You say it in your own words. You repeat them. When you feel like it, you shout them. The animals feel absent. They’re so far away. They’re on the other side. They’re behind. They’re beyond. After. Towards. Over by. Where? Where are they? Where are the animals?

If you like, we’ll go into the cage together, I’ll show you, follow me, don’t make any sudden moves. Like this, I’m going to talk to them, hello my darlings, how are you today, come here my dears, yes my little darlings, my tabbies, my pussycats, come, come poppet, here my beauty, yes you’re beautiful, hello big girl, hello my baby, what’s wrong, yes of course you’re beautiful, it’s all OK, everything’s fine, nothing’s going to happen, you’re my favourite little wild one, you’re my sweetie-pie, you’re my pussycat, everything’s fine, just fine, easy now.

You’re finding that the animals have gone quite far away, you’re finding that they haven’t come back and aren’t going to come back, that you’ll have to go looking for them, to hunt them and follow them into unlikely parts outside the towns, into the wastelands, overgrown meadows, fallow lands, copses, stretches of wild grass and brambles that the metropolis leaves in its wake. You decide, against your parents’ wishes, that you will go in search of the animals, that you’ll leave home. And to prepare for your future journey, you begin, from the age of five, to ask your parents all kinds of questions, questions to which they give evasive replies. This confirms you in your conviction. Your parents know nothing about abandoned animals or wild children, whereas you – you will know.

Cities are not made for wolves, nor wolves for cities. When wolves appear, a crisis has occurred, upsetting cycles and regions and territories and the entire distribution of species. But we’ve known for decades that the distribution of species is now a human concern, and that we can redefine and redevelop territories by populating them with creatures we have chosen, exactly like a game of chess or draughts. For example, the wolves’ installation in the city is now thoroughly planned out, the relevant authorities have given their consent and the logistical arrangements are on track. For a few months, the wolves will be settled, cared for, observed and fed by the two breeders who will accompany them on their journey, talk to them, reassure them, provide for them. And, assuming their stay passes without incident, we can then look ahead to establishing them in the long term, for the pleasure of old and young alike.

You don’t know the Sandman, or the Bogeyman, or ‘The Little Mermaid’, or ‘Monsieur Seguin’s Goat’. Instead, thanks to a record that you’ve listened to over and over since you were six, you find out that children who lie to their parents may be eaten by wolves. This does not unduly frighten you. In order to lie, you would have to talk about things that happen to you, which you do as little as possible. In any case, nothing or as good as nothing does happen to you, you spend your time daydreaming your life.

It may not be immediately obvious, but rehousing wolves in a new territory demands unwavering determination. You have to fill in stacks of forms at the Ministry of the Environment and the town hall, establish contracts with feed suppliers, remember every single link in the chain, without which the slightest hiccough – a nip, a child’s tumble, with the consequences we can all imagine – could take on dramatic proportions and give rise to long-running legal proceedings intended to attribute responsibility to someone, since the wolves cannot assume it. If wolves could be held responsible for the murders they commit, that would change everything. But wolves are not responsible. That responsibility, therefore, must fall to others, to a range of departments, people and offices, and will fall into the gaps and cracks in the system, should there be any. Generally, let’s remember, there are no cracks.

Your father reads you very few children’s stories but there’s one he reads again and again, and which, for that reason, fascinates you. It’s the story of Hans, a young stranger who, in order to rid a small Rhenish town of all the rats that overrun it, comes up with a strategy. He walks out by the town gates while playing a tune on his pipe, enticing the rats along behind him, enchanted and seduced by his music. The rats’ eradication brings about the people’s happiness.

We must not neglect the issue of housing the wolves to be kept in captivity in the city. Yes, we will house them. We will offer them trees, rocks, shelters, enclosures, dens, dwellings, holes, corners, cages, benches, polling booths, ponds, racks, cubicles, moats and public parks, and we will instal these accommodation zones in environments that are sonically, thermally, acoustically and hydrometrically adapted to their lifestyle.

The story your father tells is happy, yet it makes you uneasy. Perhaps because it’s your father, usually so uncommunicative, who’s telling it. Perhaps because at the end of the story he always sings a German nursery rhyme, not a word of which you understand. Perhaps because you wonder why your father speaks German. Perhaps, really, because there’s a bit of the story missing.

The wolves should have access to sufficiently extensive playing fields that they can roam and run without impeding traffic and without endangering human life. To ensure this, the city plans to fit out trenches that are open to the elements yet separated from the streets by unscalably high walls. Rather than being dependent on bulldozers, pneumatic drills and mechanical diggers to build these living quarters, we’ll make use of pre-existing features of the territory: abandoned archaeological digs, hydraulic barriers unused for decades due to long-term drought, former open-pit mines. While we would like the population to benefit fully from the animals’ close proximity, our difficulty lies in the rarity of this kind of structure in the immediate vicinity of our cities. This is why, following due consideration, the authorities have opted to make use of castle moats. Deep, and well preserved down the centuries thanks to the high-quality materials used to build them, these are ideal for housing wolves freshly arrived from the peri-urban tundra. And they are especially suited given that in the Middle Ages, in their untouched natural settings, castles would have been surrounded by wild animals from which protection was essential. Housing wolves within our towns and in our castles will provide a timely reminder of our history.