Agri-Innovations and Development Challenges E-Book
142,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Fachliteratur
- Sprache: Englisch
Innovation is a major challenge for economic development and social progress. Faced with the ecological and food problems that the world is currently experiencing, the legitimacy of innovation takes on its full meaning, particularly in developing countries. As emphasized by international organizations (UN, FAO), building skills and abilities in the agricultural and food sectors are necessary when launching innovation processes for the benefit of suffering populations. This book deals with different experiences launched in many developing countries in these sectors and shows how local initiatives can provide answers to the pessimism of experts and the media. Multidisciplinary analysis and practices explain how collective work creates value chains that can foster local and national economic development. The authors revisit the innovation agri-food models that contribute to economic development. Agri-Innovations and Development Challenges is composed of general presentations of innovations applied in developing countries, as well as specific studies on the joint valorization of knowledge and experience in agri-food engineering
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 484
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Ähnliche
Table of Contents
Cover
Table of Contents
Title Page
Copyright Page
Introduction: Agri-Innovations in Developing Countries
I.1. Introduction
I.2. Food security, climate change and socioeconomic disorder
I.3. Paradigm shift
I.4. Capacities and potential for agro-innovations in the South
I.5. References
1 Big Changes in Global Food Security and the Issue of Development
1.1. Introduction
1.2. Food security issues
1.3. Elements of hope
1.4. Conclusion
1.5. References
2 Agri-environmental Frugal Innovation and Sustainable Development
2.1. Introduction
2.2. From HighTech innovation to a satisfactory technological level
2.3. Sustainable food in a necessary context with respect to the Natural Environment and global warming: sorghum in Africa and rice in Asia
2.4. Conclusion
2.5. References
3 The National Innovation System as Applied to Agriculture
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Methodology
3.3. Linear model of agricultural innovation
3.4. Interactional models of agricultural innovation
3.5. Beyond the NIS: taking context as a key aspect
3.6. Practical methodology for the diagnosis of AISs in Africa
3.7. Conclusion
3.8. References
4 Adoption of Rice Technological Innovations for Technical Efficiency in Senegal
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Theoretical framework
4.3. Empirical approach
4.4. Econometric model and data analysis
4.5. Conclusion
4.6. Appendix 1
4.7. Appendix 2: empirical model of technical efficiency
4.8. References
5 Characterization of the Sectoral Cocoa Innovation System in Cameroon
5.1. Introduction
5.2. Methodological framework for analyzing information in the cocoa sector
5.3. Dynamics of the innovation system in the cocoa sector in Cameroon
5.4. What are the consequences for the sector’s research and innovation policies?
5.5. Conclusion
5.6. References
6 Valorization of the Date Industry in Tunisia by Combining “Modern” and “Traditional” Knowledge and Techniques
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Literature review
6.3. Background and research design
6.4. The results of the research
6.5. Conclusion
6.6. References
7 Technology, Innovation and Sustainability of the Soybean Chain
7.1. Introduction
7.2. State of knowledge on the subject
7.3. Theoretical framework of the study
7.4. Methodological approach adopted
7.5. Agro-technological and organizational innovation as the basis for the development of the soybean value chain in the Cameroonian cotton front
7.6. The development of the national agri-food sector: a lever for the progressive construction of a soy value chain
7.7. Environmental issues of soybean production dynamics in the Sudano-Sahelian region
7.8. Conclusion
7.9. References
8 Impact of Good Agricultural Practices on Cashew Nut Crop Yields in Senegal
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Literature review
8.3. Methodology
8.4. Results and discussion
8.5. Conclusion
8.6. References
9 Bioeconomy and Sustainable Conservation of Plants and Forests in Madagascar
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Study methods
9.3. “Vololona” Educational Botanical Garden (JBE)
9.4. Results
9.5. Discussion
9.6. Conclusion
9.7. References
10 Bricolage in Agriculture Sector
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Bricolage in the agriculture sector
10.3. Bricolage in agriculture sectors – How does it work?
10.4. Bricolage to improve Vietnamese agriculture in a scarcity context
10.5. Infrastructure resources and advanced technology
10.6. Financial resources
10.7. Human resources and skills
10.8. Conclusion
10.9. References
11 The Contribution of Food Hubs in the Digital Age to the Sustainable Agri-food Transition
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Literature review
11.3. Methodology of the documentary research and results
11.4. A lack of scientific work on food hubs in sub-Saharan Africa despite their development
11.5. Conclusion: a need for studies on food hubs in sub-Saharan Africa
11.6. References
12 Total Processing of Soy
Glycine max
through Valorization of the Tofu Whey into Cosmetic Products
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Interests in the valorization of soya whey in cosmetics
12.3. Materials and methods
12.4. Results and interpretations
12.5. Conclusion
12.6. References
List of Authors
Index
Other titles from iSTE in Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Management
End User License Agreement
List of Tables
Chapter 2
Table 2.1.
Variables related to farm model choices
Chapter 3
Table 3.1.
Description of the linear approach to agricultural innovation
Table 3.2.
Description of the training and visit approach
Table 3.3.
Description of the farming system approach
Table 3.4.
Description of the multiactor platform approach to agricultural i
...
Table 3.5.
Description of the NIS approach
Chapter 4
Table 4.1.
Determinants of technology adoption by treatment level.
Table 4.2.
Impact of new technology adoption on technical efficiency. Source
...
Table 4.3.
Socioeconomic characteristics of adopter groups by treatment leve
...
Chapter 6
Table 6.1.
Research interviews
Chapter 7
Table 7.1.
Agro-industrial enterprises of soybean processing in Cameroon
Table 7.2.
Agro-industrial soybean processing projects in Cameroon supported
...
Table 7.3.
Spatial distribution of cooperative societies of soybean producer
...
Table 7.4.
Calculation of land cover areas for the years 2014 and 2018 (in k
...
Chapter 8
Table 8.1.
Sociodemographic characteristics of producers
Table 8.2.
Socioeconomic characteristics of producers
Table 8.3.
Impact of the adoption of good agricultural practices on yield
...
Table 8.4.
Determinants of producer returns
Chapter 9
Table 9.1.
Impacts of creating the JBE annex (Figure 9.1(C)) or plot 2 in th
...
Table 9.2.
Interest in biomass exploitation for the bioeconomy planned in th
...
Chapter 11
Table 11.1.
Summary of the comparison of food hubs in Africa and in develope
...
Chapter 12
Table 12.1.
Results of microbiological quality control of whey
List of Illustrations
Chapter 1
Figure 1.1.
Three-century evolution of the world’s population, broken down c
...
Figure 1.2.
Percentiles of thermal anomalies (positive in red, negative in b
...
Figure 1.3.
Comparison of cumulative percentage of the world’s population by
...
Figure 1.4.
National cereal production in the world as a function of nitroge
...
Chapter 5
Figure 5.1.
Stakeholder system mapping for the cocoa sector under administra
...
Figure 5.2.
Mapping of institutions structuring the sectoral innovation syst
...
Figure 5.3.
Distribution of cocoa seedlings from improved planting material
...
Chapter 6
Figure 6.1.
Main date producers in the world
Figure 6.2.
Major date exporters in the world in 2020 classified by value de
...
Figure 6.3.
Stage of packaging of the date
Chapter 7
Figure 7.1.
Collection and conditioning of soil samples in Touboro and Madin
...
Figure 7.2.
The Cameroonian cotton front, a soybean production basin.
Figure 7.3.
Evolution of soybean production in the Mayo-Rey cotton front (20
...
Figure 7.4.
Land use in Touboro and Madingring in 2008.
Figure 7.5.
Land use in Touboro and Madingring in 2014.
Figure 7.6.
Land use in Touboro and Madingring in 2018.
Chapter 8
Figure 8.1.
Kolda Region,
Chapter 9
Figure 9.1.
Location of the study sites: (A) Boeny region bounded by the Bet
...
Figure 9.2.
Samples of the seeds of plants used to control Covid-19 collecte
...
Chapter 10
Figure 10.1.
Pham Thanh Tinh checks shrimp food in the canvas
Figure 10.2.
Le Van Sua and his multipurpose sprayer
Figure 10.3.
Ta Dinh Huy and his multifunction machine
Figure 10.4.
Pham Van Hat and his seeding machine
Figure 10.5.
Lien-Viet-Post Bank officers in rubber tree cooperatives
Figure 10.6.
Farmers guided by instructors from the Vuong Thanh Cong company
Chapter 11
Figure 11.1.
Publications of studies related to “food hubs” or “food hubs” o
...
Figure 11.2.
Change in the number of publications referring to the concepts
...
Chapter 12
Figure 12.1.
Steps in the production of tofu.
Figure 12.2.
Results of the principal component analysis of tofu.
Figure 12.3.
Tofu preference test results.
Figure 12.4.
Example of volunteer photos.
Guide
Cover Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Introduction: Agri-Innovations in Developing Countries
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Index
Other titles from iSTE in Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Management
Wiley End User License Agreement
Pages
iii
iv
xiii
xiv
xv
xvi
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
Innovation in Engineering and Technology Setcoordinated byDimitri Uzunidis
Volume 8
Agri-Innovations and Development Challenges
Engineering, Value Chains and Socio-economic Models
Edited by
Vanessa CasadellaDimitri Uzunidis
First published 2023 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:
ISTE Ltd
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27-37 St George’s Road
111 River Street
London SW19 4EU
Hoboken, NJ 07030
UK
USA
www.iste.co.uk
www.wiley.com
© ISTE Ltd 2023
The rights of Vanessa Casadella and Dimitri Uzunidis to be identified as the authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s), contributor(s) or editor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of ISTE Group.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2023936092
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication DataA CIP record for this book is available from the British LibraryISBN 978-1-78630-915-0
IntroductionAgri-Innovations in Developing Countries: Relevant Responses to the Environmental, Food, and Social Crisis
I.1. Introduction
A total of 828 million people were suffering from food poverty in 2021, representing 9.8% of the world’s population. In 2019 and 2020, this share was 8% and 9.3%, respectively. Nearly 2.3 billion people (29.3% of the world population) were moderately or severely food insecure. In 2021, 31.9% of the world’s women were moderately or severely food insecure, compared to 27.6% of men. Note that 3.1 billion people could not afford a healthy diet. In most countries of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, as well as in some Central American countries, the food emergency is absolute. In the world, due to the increase in social inequalities, conflicts and especially climate change, food is far from being guaranteed and the conditions of agricultural production are worsening. The latest FAO report (2022) is more than alarming. If nothing is done to curb global warming, improve the sharing of wealth and stop military conflicts between nations, it is the world’s food security that will be threatened: loss of nutrients in staple foods, reduced harvests, large-scale climatic disasters in several regions, etc. The risks are high and the first signs of this agricultural and food crisis are already visible. Food security will be increasingly compromised by future climate change due to lower yields, especially in tropical regions, higher prices, reduced quality of nutrients and disruptions in the supply chain.
Ecologically responsible agricultural production, less harmful to the environment and biodiversity, requires targeted innovations through research processes, dissemination of relevant knowledge, for the experimentation of this knowledge in the field, productive adaptation, integration in crops, livestock and processing or by promoting adapted commercial channels and creative entrepreneurship.
I.2. Food security, climate change and socioeconomic disorder
Food safety can only be understood holistically: it encompasses all elements that can impact food safety at each stage of the agri-food value chain. Applying this approach means that food safety is not only about the development of the final product that starts with primary production, with it being processed in the factory and sold in the market, but also emphasizes the need for interaction between all stakeholders in the value chain and between these and the characteristics of their environment, such as climate change, demographics, the state of the economy, social structure, etc. (Gaitis and Ouzounidou 2017).
The correlation between food security and climate change is part of a sociotechnical and economic context based on the following three pillars (Uzunidis 2019):
a) The rapid increase in the world population associated with malnutrition, poverty and famine: the FAO estimates that by 2050, the global demand for food and feed will increase by 60%. Two billion people in the world are overweight; one billion are chronically undernourished.
b) The domination of the petrochemical paradigm in economic activity.
c) The socioeconomic organization and the global model of governance: industrial and intensive agriculture and breeding, transnational oligopoly (Big Food), conflicts of sanitary norms and patents, protectionist tendencies, unequal distribution of income and access to food resources, decrease or sudden fluctuations of raw material prices, etc. – “planet for profit strategies and policies” or “profit strategies against planet and people”. The current food system generates one-third of greenhouse gas emissions!
The correlation between agriculture, food security and climate change can be seen in the definitions of these two concepts: food security is achieved when all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their energy needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
The following four conditions must be met to achieve food safety:
– Food availability: this first condition refers to the quantity of food available that is sufficiently abundant to satisfy the vital needs of the population. The growth of agricultural production must therefore be positively correlated with the increase in population.
– Physical, social and economic access to food: this second condition refers to demand. The evolution of the supply of agricultural products must be correlated with the evolution of demand, which, correlated with the level of income, must be satisfied to cover vital individual and collective needs.
– The quality of the food consumed: this condition refers to the nature of the products consumed and must be correlated with other parameters related to health, the physical environment and the individual and collective socialization of the populations.
– Stability or sustainability, in the sense that the food security sought is not a one-time event and must be part of a sustainable and socially equitable development perspective.
Food security is therefore a complex, multidimensional concept that depends on agricultural and cooperation policies, economic choices, trade regulations and social policies and standards.
Climate change refers to all variations in climatic characteristics. Air pollution, resulting from human activities, modifies the climate, in the sense of a global warming. This phenomenon can cause significant damage: rising sea levels, increased extreme weather events (droughts, floods, cyclones, etc.), destabilization of forests, threats to freshwater resources, agricultural difficulties, desertification, reduction of biodiversity, extension of tropical diseases, etc.
The effects of climate change are increasingly felt in agricultural production. Inaction in decision-making to adapt to this change is becoming an insurmountable constraint, with the risk of leading to a total impasse. In any case, adjustments must be multi-level and implemented at the international, national and local levels on the basis of a set of precise and imperative actions to address the issues raised by climate change. Climate change is a major concern in primary production, marketing and processing, in particular, of plants, as extreme weather events in recent decades have resulted in lower crop yields, loss of production and income due to harsh bioeconomic conditions, and a decrease in the quantities of nutritious quality products packaged and processed (Ortiz-Bobea et al. 2021).
The challenge, according to the experts (Christopoulos and Ozounidou 2021), is to articulate an economic approach, environmental protection and new models of technological, organizational and social innovation and social justice in a context of economic globalization, privatization/commodification of natural resources and deepening inequalities. Indeed, regarding the variations and the extreme climatic conditions:
a) They are negatively impact the availability, access, use and stability of agricultural and food resources, as well as feeding, care and health practices. Direct and indirect climate impacts have a cumulative effect, leading to increased food insecurity and malnutrition.
b) They are negatively correlated with agricultural productivity, food production, cropping patterns, thus contributing to food shortages, and nutrition: the nutritional quality and diversity of food produced and consumed deteriorates, and water stress increases, resulting in increased health risks, diseases and poverty.
c) They lead to sharp increases and volatility in primary product and food prices, often associated with losses of farm income reducing access to food and negatively affecting the quantity, quality and dietary diversity of food consumed.
I.3. Paradigm shift
As climate change contributes to biodiversity loss, which poses an imminent and ongoing threat to food security and livelihoods, the urgency of the paradigm shift is equally clear (Schlaile et al. 2022). The food chain faces increasing threats each year from repeated droughts, floods, wildfires, loss of wildlife and the emergence of new pests, microbes and viruses. In response to these threats to cope with climate change, there is a need to (a) implement measures to plan new plantings by selecting appropriate varieties according to local climatic conditions, (b) promote research and development (R&D) to discover/design stress-resistant varieties, (c) record climatic parameters, (d) provide timely information to growers on the importance of modifying conventional farming practices (e.g. use of chemicals and intensive farming), (e) use modern technological tools (precision or smart farming), (f) develop irrigation and flood protection infrastructure, (g) restructure some crops to higher elevations where conditions are more suitable, (h) provide artificial soil cover crops and (i) rely on traditional and endogenous knowledge and models of community self-organization that can be compatible with “doing” and “sustaining”. In animal husbandry, the use of on-farm technologies to improve herd management for maximum production results at the lowest possible cost is another avenue to explore. Finally, and for all this, water management is the key issue. The achievement of all these objectives, which are difficult to reach but urgent, requires the introduction of major innovations in the productive systems.
To cope with extreme weather events, satisfy ever-changing consumer tastes, and meet ever-increasing demand for high-quality food, or simply subsistence products, farmers today and in the decades to come are called upon to grow more crops using less water and inputs, adopt new technologies and invest in improving the quality of their crops. The need for cooperation in the field of agricultural technology is imperative for all of the above because more must be produced, qualitatively and quantitatively, with fewer natural resources and inputs: more with less. And in this endeavor, no institution, idea or technology can be left out.
In short, five main pathways are proposed to ensure the reduction of climate change impacts on food security:
1) control of food production by the producer and the consumer – this leads to the rationalization of the agricultural activity in relation to the available resources and change in the “Big Food” paradigm;
2) developing ecological agriculture: change in the petrochemical paradigm;
3) promoting biodiversity;
4) strengthening the resilience of food systems;
5) promoting biochemistry and the bioeconomy in general.
It is a question of re-establishing a more balanced relationship between the biosphere and the socioeconomic sphere. The bioeconomy associated with digital technologies and frugality calls for the design and application of new sociotechnical models. The implementation of ecodevelopment strategies based on the creation of a development model linked to the needs of populations, the participatory and contributive process and the characteristics and resources of the territories is not without consequences for the agricultural world, which must both feed the population and provide sufficient organic resources to meet our energy needs. Thus, the diversity of environments, contexts, modes of coordination and the influence of existing institutions must be taken into account to ensure structural changes (Debref et al. 2022).
As the authors of this book show, it is a question of designing production systems according to the functionalities offered by ecosystems: reduction of pressure on the environment and preservation of natural resources. The challenge is to articulate the economic approach with environmental protection and social justice (equity in the distribution of wealth, pacification) in a context of economic globalization, commercialization of natural resources and increasing inequalities. The paradigm shift (in the sense of a new mode of production, consumption, distribution and socialization) is a burning issue! However, the ecological transition for food security comes up against insufficient efforts to reduce pollution on a global scale, as well as the absence of a global governance of common goods and resources. On the other hand, strategies for appropriating life by “Big Food”, lobbying and standardization by anticipating the use of alternative technologies slow down the diffusion of green innovations, increase their cost of design and application, prohibit their use on a large scale and prevent design thinking in this field from blossoming on a new trajectory of creativity and project engineering.
I.4. Capacities and potential for agro-innovations in the South
The environmental crisis is all the more perceptible in developing countries, as their agricultural and agri-food production capacities are weak. In most countries in Africa, Latin America and South Asia, citizen mobilization (farmers, consumers, associations, small businesses, etc.) is taking shape through small-scale actions, but they are bringing about innovations that are sometimes frugal, sometimes on a larger scale. Value chains are taking shape, developing and asserting themselves in their economies on both local and global levels.
The notions of innovation systems and capacities have been used both by public policies and in the academic sphere to relate the innovation performance of territories, sectors, regions and nations. Innovation systems are represented by the connection between actors from the academic, political and productive worlds to organize, mobilize and valorize material, financial and human resources for the purpose of innovation. Innovation capabilities are defined both by the knowledge, skills and techniques available to an economy, and by the interactions between innovation actors in that economy to explore and exploit opportunities to develop new products or services based on the needs of individual or collective consumers or users (Casadella et al. 2015; Casadella and Uzunidis 2017).
In order for innovation capacities to become a system, it is necessary to multiply, fluidify and strengthen interactions between private and public innovation actors through the formation of value chains. The ability to innovate and adapt to economic and socioecological hazards thus depends on institutional arrangements in addition to technological development (Asayehegn et al. 2017). A value chain is constructed by three sets of elements that characterize the systemic nature of the relationships between the actors that form it: (a) the succession of integrated transformation operations that are separable and identifiable, but that are linked to each other by technological sequences that ensure their integration; (b) the commercial and financial relationships between all stages of production and between customers and suppliers that ensure the coordination of the activities of the parties involved; (c) the strategies of the actors, which aim for joint valorization at all stages of the chain of production and ensure the articulation of activities. The stages of integration concern both the pathway from the raw material to the production and trade of products and the successive valorization of scientific and technical knowledge necessary for the emergence and diffusion of complementary and cumulative innovations.
These notions are more globally addressed in the approach to economic and sustainable development and inclusion objectives set by international bodies (such as the sustainable development goals (SDGs) set by the UN: eradicating hunger and poverty, supporting sustainable agriculture and renewable energies, promoting sustainable development and education, conscientiously managing and preserving natural resources and ecosystems, combating social inequalities, etc.).
While the structure of innovation ecosystems in developing economies is very heterogeneous depending on the contexts visited, it is clear that they are often depicted as disorganized, fragmented or disconnected in their development process. However, according to the studies presented in this book, these systems are carried by actors of all categories who allow them to emerge, maintain and perpetuate themselves. The actions of actors, more or less formal, more or less interconnected, constitute significant dynamics that structure and shape innovation capacities. Represented by different forms of organization of collective action (producer groups, cooperatives, associations) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), they are called upon to play a key role in the definition of policies and actions in favor of innovation and thus largely contribute to the formation and implementation of innovation capacities. They are sometimes called upon to complement or replace public authorities when public innovation policies are lacking.
But other actors are also stakeholders in local learning dynamics: civil society, with village communities, trades, genders, cooperatives, through different forms of learning, on the job, built by indigenous societies and communities mobilizing their own institutions of social cohesion, constitutive of local knowledge and collective social values.
This raises the question of the appropriation of this knowledge and the endogenization of local knowledge, combining culture, identity, confidence and a thirst for modernity. This bottom-up approach to capabilities, sometimes identified in situations of frugal innovation or the “bottom of the pyramid”, is essential in understanding the current dynamics of innovation and learning in southern economies. The challenge is to be able to create learning capacities that reconnect with the resources that generate this learning as much as with the macro-economic conditions that territorialize it, and the sociopolitical locks or levers that activate it and allow it to be mobilized in the productive and social sphere. We can see, thanks to the studies presented by the authors of this book, that in countries where process engineering is quantitatively and qualitatively important, learning mechanisms are rich and can be observed by the amount of energy spent by actors to solve problems, but also by the capacity of actors to master new knowledge. Innovation here is the result of a set of efforts and trajectories of use of local knowledge, and the capacity to integrate the knowledge conveyed by foreign direct investment, international academic and agro-industrial cooperation or repatriated skilled labor.
The following issues are addressed by the authors in the light of the diversity of the countries and experiences studied: How do we protect the environment through new knowledge? What transformations should be carried out with the aim of improving the living conditions of populations? How do civil society actors participate in the formation of innovation capacities and in their implementation? How do public institutions integrate them into their operations? How can innovation processes, whether formal or informal, generate learning and innovation capacities? Engineering has a particularly revealing, mobilizing and integrating function for these capacities. How do different professional and rural communities form and structure knowledge that is the basis for learning capacities? What are the different forms of learning that are localized and specific to the capacities of developing country economies?
The book is structured around 12 presentations of experiences in different developing countries (Africa, Asia, Central America), and around the above-mentioned issues.
The first chapter by J.-L. Hornick, entitled “Big Changes in Global Food Security and the Issue of Development: Challenges and Hopes”, discusses the importance of capitalizing on new discoveries to ensure nutritional security for future generations. In the current state of knowledge, global awareness of the issues and the implementation of known technologies must be able to delay the advent of a brutal decoupling of food supply and demand to respond to the important societal changes around food security and safety. The question is: How do we move from the potential for innovation announced by current technologies to the real and profitable application of these technologies? The transition between the “potential” and the “real” favors the emergence of agro-industrial sectors.
Taking into account the Natural Environment and global warming imperatively requires the application of a qualitative model capable of responding to the challenges of food, nature protection and wealth sharing. In Chapter 2, by P. Bouvier-Patron, entitled “Agri-environmental Frugal Innovation and Sustainable Development”, the formation of agri-food chains must mobilize technology in a rational way to produce useful and adapted systems and products. This is the case for frugal environmental innovation, which relies on innovative creativity, whose main sources are “tinkering” and improvisation, within local communities of practice, to adjust to the constraints of the place and the time in the best way possible. The author presents the possible evolution of the cultivation of two world cereals that could be virtuous and indicative of the new model to follow: sorghum and rice. The observation shows that value chains are created or completed through frugal innovations.
The third chapter by E.M.F.W. Sawadogo/Compaoré and N. Sawadogo, entitled “The National Innovation System as Applied to Agriculture: A Methodological Proposal for Diagnosis in Africa”, shows the legitimacy of the national innovation system (NIS) as a tool for policy analysis and governance in Burkina Faso. In this country, the NIS has acquired strong legitimacy in policy and research circles for some time. By borrowing a sectoral focus on agriculture and contextualizing a number of tools provided by the model presented, the proposal made by the authors consists of developing a practical methodological guide for the diagnosis of agro-innovation systems in Africa.
The fourth chapter by B. Ndiaye and A. Bayompe Kabou, entitled “Adoption of Rice Technological Innovation on Technical Efficiency in Senegal”, analyzes the impact of the adoption of new rice technologies on the technical efficiency of farmers in Senegal. According to the latter, fertilizer treatment levels have more or less technical efficiency on rice farmers. In the end, Senegalese rice farmers who use fertilizer, improved seed and motorized equipment simultaneously are more economically efficient than those who only use fertilizer and improved seed.
Using the concept of the sectoral innovation system (SSI), S. Mathé, E.J. Fofiri and L. Temple attempt to understand and organize public policy choices in the cocoa sector in Cameroon in the fifth chapter entitled “Characterization of the Sectoral Cocoa Innovation System in Cameroon”. Since 2002, there have been many stimulus packages in this country to increase cocoa yields and production through the transfer of scientific and technical knowledge. Nevertheless, their analysis reveals dysfunctions in this SSI and the value chains that could result from it. The authors propose to identify potential levers for a sustainable and more inclusive innovation trajectory for the production studied.
The sixth chapter, written by Y. Boughzala and N. Ben Mahmoud, entitled “Valorization of the Date Industry in Tunisia by Combining “Modern” and “Traditional” Knowledge and Techniques: Difficulties, Successes and Prospects”, analyzes the date industry in Tunisia by highlighting the structuring of this agricultural value chain through strategic, economic and social issues. The objective is to understand the different impacts of these challenges on the organizations inherent to this economically promising sector for the country’s exports. From this perspective, the authors show a dual agricultural value chain with a lack of structuring between the links in the chain, despite international leadership in terms of exports in value. Some challenges need to be addressed upstream to create a more efficient global value chain around a more equitable and inclusive sector. The public authorities and the various stakeholders must also play a more proactive role.
The seventh chapter, “Technology, Innovation and Sustainability of the Soybean Chain: Study of the Cameroonian Cotton Front Facing Environmental Challenges”, by E.J. Fofiri Nzossié, D.N. Nitcheu Wakponou and C. Bring shows the dynamics of soybean production driven by growing demand from the national agribusiness sector and the cross-border market with Nigeria. This dynamic offers opportunities for the construction of a science and technology (S&T) policy in the agribusiness sector, on the one hand, and for the improvement of farmers’ incomes, on the other hand, but it also responds to environmental issues in the face of the accelerated degradation of the country’s Natural Environment. The authors analyze the environmental issues induced by soybean cultivation and show the accelerated regression of the vegetation cover and the degradation of the soil. The first issue is related to the expansion of cultivated areas through land clearing. The second is inherent to the intensification of the use of phytosanitary products and mainly glyphosate. Biochemistry would be a solution adapted to this type of problem.
In another sub-Saharan African country, the eighth chapter by B.W. Basse, S. Mbaye and O. Diop, “Impact of Good Agricultural Practices on Cashew Nut Crop Yields in Senegal”, analyzes the impact of good agricultural practices in cashew nut sector support projects. They found that changing producer behavior is a good tool for increasing cashew productivity in Senegal. Thus, for a sustainable cashew sector, awareness-raising strategies can be developed by mobilizing a range of local actors (community radios, village chiefs, development agents, supervisory and research structures, etc.).
Good practices in the preservation of natural resources (especially plants and forests) are illustrated by H.L.T. Ranarijaona, T. Andrianasetra, L.J. Raharinaivo, V. Ramahatafandry, M. Befinoana, A.B. Ramiandrisoa, C. Maharombaka, S. Tomboanona, C.C. Totondrabesa, F. Andriamanantena, S.G. Andrianasetra, A. Andriamanantena and A.Z. Rabesa in the ninth chapter (Bioeconomy and Sustainable Conservation of Plants and Forests in Madagascar). The case of Madagascar is revealing in this regard: the creation of an innovative botanical garden with the involvement of researchers, engineers and the local population has formed an innovative ecosystem whose objective is to demonstrate the dependence of humans on traditional medicinal plants, and the new uses of plants, today in the fields of health and food, to strengthen conservation, the local economy and sustainable development.
The sustainability of innovation in agriculture can also be analyzed with reference to the concept of “bricolage”. In Chapter 10, “Bricolage in the Agriculture Sector: Emergence Dynamic and Consequences in Vietnam”, S.T.K. Le, T.T. Nguyen and P.A.T. Nguyen note that in most developing countries agricultural resources and means are scarce or insufficient, and that farmers in these countries, who produce mainly on a small scale, lack financial, skilled human and technological resources, and very often resort to simple and traditional, sometimes even unconventional, methods for cultivation or breeding. In this case, “bricolage” appears as a concept describing how individuals improvise by recombining existing, but individually less useful, resources to create value through creative and systemic reconstruction. The authors study the case of Vietnam to show that “bricolage” is a source of multiple innovations through the mobilization of relevant traditional knowledge and experience.
This “bricolage” is found in Sub-Saharan Africa, but this time in the centralization and marketing of agri-food products via “food hubs”, which are concentrates of technological and organizational innovations. In Chapter 11, “The Contribution of Food Hubs in the Digital Age to the Sustainable ‘Agri-food’ Transition: A Review of Research in Sub-Saharan Africa”, G. de la Paix Bayiha explains how to manage the growing gap between rural supply and urban demand for quality food products. This calls for a strong integration of agri-food chains to form sustainable “agri-food” systems at the territorial level. For direct sales to consumers, food hubs provide solutions for small farmers in Africa involved in sustainable agri-food models. These farmers can thus have easier access to urban markets and consequently improve the standard of living in the countryside.
Through a precise engineering approach, Chapter 12, by D. Andrianjafy, H. Rim Farasoa and F. Rasoarahona, entitled “Total Processing of Soy Glycine max through Valorization of the Tofu Whey in Cosmetic Products”, deals with the study of the natural cosmetic sector in Madasgacar. According to the authors, the overexploitation of plant species threatens their existence, presents a potential danger for the ecology and, in the long term, will always have negative consequences for these countries. The valorization of cultivable plants is therefore a solution of choice. According to them, new cosmetic care products have been developed and this valorization enriches the value chain up to the production and marketing of soy cheese.
All in all, the contributions in this book offer a precise and in-depth reading of the mechanisms of agro-innovations for economic development purposes in the context of increasing food needs and accelerating climate change. New (or improved) socioeconomic models are emerging within specific organizations or sectors that value the importance of value chains created from localized learning processes, driven by do-it-yourself policies and constrained by developing country contexts that remain heterogeneous.
I.5. References
Asayehegn, K., Iglesias, A., Triomphe, B., Pédelahore, P., Temple, L. (2017). The role of systems of innovation in adapting to climate change: The case of the Kenyan coffee and dairy sectors.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 24(3), 127–149.
Casadella, V. and Uzunidis, D. (2017). National innovation systems of the south, innovation and economic development policies: A multidimensional approach.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 23(2), 137–157.
Casadella, V., Liu, Z., Uzunidis, D. (2015).
Innovation Capabilities and Economic Development in Open Economies
. ISTE Ltd, London, and John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Christopoulos, M. and Ouzounidou, G. (2021). Climate change effects on the perceived and nutritional quality of fruit and vegetables.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 34(1), 79–99.
Debref, R., Andreas Pyka, A., Perguiseppe Morone, P. (2022). For an institutionalist approach to the bioeconomy: Innovation, green growth and the rise of new development models.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 38(2), 1–9.
FAO (2022).
The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022
. FAO, Rome.
Gaitis, F. and Ouzounidou, G. (2017). Food safety: Strengthening the present with an eye to the future.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 24(3), 177–189.
Ortiz-Bobea, A., Ault, T.R., Carrillo, C.M., Chambers, R.G., Lobell, D.B. (2021). Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth.
Nature Climate Change
, 11, 306–312.
Schlaile, M.P., Kask, J., Brewer, J., Bogner, K., Urmetzer, S., Annick De Witt, A. (2022). Proposing a cultural evolutionary perspective for dedicated innovation systems: Bioeconomy transitions and beyond.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 38(2), 93–118.
Touzard, J.-M. and Boutillier, S. (2017). Innovations and solutions for climate change.
Journal of Innovation Economics & Management
, 24(3), 3–8.
Uzunidis, D. (2019). A focus on food international challenges global food challenges related to climate change.
Agro-Innovation, Food Quality and Safety
, 10(1), 1–7.
Note
Introduction written by Dimitri UZUNIDIS and Vanessa CASADELLA.
1Big Changes in Global Food Security and the Issue of Development: Challenges and Hopes
1.1. Introduction
Food security and safety are not recent issues on a human scale (Litzenburger 2016; Birlouez 2019). They have been the subject of relentless efforts since humans first became aware of the time scale in which life occurs. Control of these issues has developed in parallel with scientific and technological knowledge. A tipping point can be located around the middle of the 19th century, with the appearance of the first combustion engines that led to the increase in agricultural productivity and the transportation of products, and with the Pastorian discoveries that laid the scientific foundations of food preservation.
Five pillars of food security – in the broadest sense – have been chronologically accepted and formalized over the last 60 years: the availability of food in sufficient quantity, the possibility of economic access to resources, the conformity of sanitary quality and composition of ingredients and the plate, the stability of supply in the short and medium term and more recently, the long-term sustainability of the system to guarantee intergenerational solidarity (Akram-Lodhi 2009). These dimensions are of major importance to contribute to the stability of our societies. This chapter reviews some of the issues related to food security and safety, and avenues to ensure their continuity. More specific aspects related to food security will be highlighted.
1.2. Food security issues
Paradoxically, the major world conflicts were catalysts for population growth (see Figure 1.1). It was particularly after World War II that the human population showed a strong relative expansion. The phenomenon was most pronounced in Asia and later in Africa. This continent is currently the only one to present an exponential increase in population, compensating for the decreases observed elsewhere. World population growth has been linear for the last 50 years at a rate of nearly 70 million people per year.
Figure 1.1.Three-century evolution of the world’s population, broken down cumulatively by continent from 1950 to the present day, and projected to the end of the century (Our World in Data 2021; United Nations 2019).
Improved agri-food practices and increased agricultural production have undoubtedly contributed to these demographic shifts. For example, the share of the world’s population fed by agricultural practices using synthetic fertilizers has risen from virtually nothing to nearly 50% in 60 years (Erisman et al. 2008).
The preservation of food security is currently under threat, and humanity is facing challenges, which Hajkowicz (2015) has termed “mega-trends”, or large-scale conjunctural “shifts”. These shifts are all anthropogenic in origin and are likely to force humanity to reconsider how it will need to feed itself in future decades. The “demographic tide” movement mentioned above is one of these challenges.
The gradual increase in the earth’s temperature is another, as it threatens the very foundations of agricultural productivity. The National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) of NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce in the United States) publishes a map of thermal anomalies recorded on the planet every year. In the last three years (see Figure 1.2), most regions of the globe have shown anomalous thermal averages compared to recent decades. Global warming will have consequences on the capacity of human organizations to ensure stable agricultural production. Thus, in most regions of the world, we must expect the emergence of extreme climatic events, such as torrential rains or scorching temperatures, which are not easily predictable in the short term. The management of water, whether to store it or obtain it, will therefore become a major issue of food security.
Figure 1.2.Percentiles of thermal anomalies (positive in red, negative in blue) recorded over land in the last three years (National Center for Environmental Information, 2019, 2020, 2021).
Urbanization and migration to cities reflect another trend that has been sustained for several decades. It profoundly modifies the relationship between humans and the land, and causes an evolution from global, climatic food insecurity to a more economic form. Indeed, urban populations, although maintaining close social relations with peri-urban or rural areas, are more dependent on the availability of and access to imported food. Notwithstanding their density, they cannot reasonably rely on significant production of resources from the cities themselves. The vast majority of urban land is not suitable for agriculture due to the presence of roads and buildings. Even attempts to develop green roofs are hampered by the existence of artificial soil that is not deep enough to regulate water and nutrient cycling, as is the case in natural soils. As a general rule, the relative yields of such agriculture can only be low. Urban populations are thus dependent on rural production by road for their food, but even more so on imports through international trade routes, which are often facilitated by the presence of large cities near port areas, whether by river or sea.
In urban areas, privileged access to imported food resources has several consequences. On the one hand, people are no longer forced to cultivate the land, and, on the other hand, they have easier access to highly refined foods such as oils, simple carbohydrates or intensively produced meats. The latter are themselves often richer in fat – and therefore less rich in animal protein – because of the speed with which the animals grow. The consequences of access to these resources result in an increasing incidence of obesity when the income linked to the social class to which the individual belongs allows them to make these choices. Malnutrition through overeating is another major current trend.
Moreover, the easier access to imported food reflects another phenomenon that has become more widespread since World War II, namely, the speed and fluidity with which food travels along distribution channels. These two characteristics reflect a unified world in terms of transportation and communication, and facilitate the mechanisms of genetic introgression within ecological niches, and consequently, the transfer of pathogens, with the associated epidemic risks.
Paradoxically, despite these threats, the average life expectancy of the population is continually increasing, and although the natural age pyramid is normally presented in pyramidal form, as its name indicates, it shows a strong relative erosion of the proportion of the young population (see Figure 1.3). In some countries, such as Japan, there has also been a marked reduction in the birth rate (Matsuda 2020). Some pyramids may therefore evolve into the shape of an inverted teardrop, evoking the image of a hot air balloon rising toward a glass ceiling. Even if some states try to fight against the decrease in birth rates by promoting immigration or adopting family protection reforms, the global evolution of the age pyramid will have consequences on food security criteria. As people age, and particularly as they pass a threshold in older age, nutritional needs change (Rusu et al. 2020). Energy requirements – mainly related to the consumption of fats and carbohydrates – decrease, while the need for high biological value proteins, which can help kidney function, increases, as well as the need for minerals and vitamins, and the importance of fiber and antioxidant factors. The modification of the age pyramid profile thus gradually changes the composition of the plate. This is perhaps one of the elements that explains the current interest in organic or biological production.
Figure 1.3.Comparison of cumulative percentage of the world’s population by age category, 1950–2020 (calculated from United Nations (2019)).
Taken together, these societal changes go hand in hand with a temporal contraction of food supply processes, but also with a form of spatial, economic and cognitive dilation of the steps in these processes. Indeed, with the development of means of transport, food travels further, which requires a multiplication of economic intermediaries and atomizes the distribution of added values – whether aggregated or not within these intermediaries – and this dilation also results in a feeling of insecurity as to the origin of the food. The latter is responsible for anxiety, and even chaos, when the already fragile confidence of the consumer in what they eat is called into question (Bricas 2003). Examples such as the mad cow disease or the recurrent discovery of undesirable residues in consumer products remain in the collective memory or are part of people’s daily lives. This anxiety is rarely totally justified when compared to objective facts, but it is part of our human nature. However, the points of attention that mobilize societies vary according to culture. Thus, the countries of the European Union are particularly demanding regarding traceability and transparency within the food chain. Latin American countries, especially Peru, are more sensitive to issues of sustainability and the absence of xenobiotic residues in food products. The Asian region, on the other hand, is primarily concerned with controlling the food supply and biosafety, particularly through technological developments (Alltech 2020).
In light of these challenges, there is a case for looking ahead to how to ensure food security in future decades. The questions are not only about availability, but also about the other dimensions of food security and safety.
1.3. Elements of hope
There are several ways to meet the challenge of ensuring sufficient food availability in the future: consume less and produce more, or at least maintain the current capacity of food production systems. A human needs approximately 2,500 kcal of metabolizable energy per day and approximately 1 g of protein per kilo of body weight, or approximately 12% of energy intake. Half of these proteins should be of high biological value, rich in essential amino acids, and with a profile similar to that of human tissue. Proteins that meet these criteria are generally of animal origin. In a growing number of countries, humans can be considered to consume twice this amount for hedonic reasons. These are also partly responsible for the obesity epidemic in the human population.
To a first approximation, the animal and its food products are the result of a process of concentration of the proteins – often of plant origin – that it ingests, associated with a refinement of their quality. Ruminants are an exception to this rule, as the flora of their pre-stomachs are able to synthesize microbial proteins of very high biological value from proteins of mediocre quality, for example, from cereals, or even from non-protein nitrogen such as urea. However, the basic principle behind the construction of the individual remains similar: the animal extracts the essential amino acids that it cannot synthesize itself from food and stores them in its body proteins or exports them in products such as milk or eggs. The efficiency of this storage process is unfortunately low. In the best of cases, it is approximately 50%, for example, in genetically selected poultry. It is zero for non-productive animals whose feed consumption only allows them to maintain a stable weight. In addition to quantitative conversion, it is also necessary to consider qualitative issues. Indeed, the consumption of a cereal by an animal gives it a competitive character with respect to humans. On the other hand, coarse plant products are not, in the current state of our knowledge, a source of nutrients for the human species, but they can be perfectly valued by a ruminant to ensure, at a minimum, its survival. In summary, for every calorie ingested by humans, the calorie from animal products requires twice as much agricultural land as its plant counterpart. The reduction in demand for agricultural land can therefore result from a reduction in the consumption of animal products in favor of other ingredients. It is then based on a modification of the consumer’s plate.
On the other hand, a decrease in food demand may be the result of better control of food losses and waste. Losses are often related to the initial and intermediate stages of production, for example in the case of crop diseases or animal epidemics requiring slaughtering. Waste is more likely to be related to losses at the end of the production chain, such as unsold products that are destroyed or food that has passed its sell-by date. Losses are more frequent in countries with low technological development, while wastage is more frequent in countries with food glut situations. Waste can also occur at the beginning of the production chain in low-income countries. For example, slash-and-burn agriculture consists of cleaning and fertilizing soils with minerals by burning natural or crop straws. In addition to mortgaging the organic matter load of soils, this practice potentially deprives animals such as ruminants of a source of food, or farmers and herders of another form of resource utilization, if they had the technology to use it.
A second way to support food security would be to maintain and increase agricultural production and capacity. This approach seems conceivable only by increasing crop area or food production per unit area. This is a considerable challenge, and the second option is probably the most promising, both for environmental reasons related to the conservation of areas dedicated to biodiversity and for reasons of physical constraints.
The potential for increasing agricultural productivity is high. There is a logarithmic relationship between the application of crop protection agents, mainly fertilizers and pesticides, and agricultural yields. The latter can be increased 10-fold by moving from the worst cultivation conditions – lack of fertilizer, low water availability, low technological development and low farmer training – to the best. Belgium, for example, has a grain productivity of nearly 10 tons of dry matter per hectare, compared to less than 2 tons for most less developed countries (see Figure 1.4). The application of inputs, however, has adverse environmental consequences. Technologies to provide plants with essential nutrients in a “targeted, timely” manner to maximize the efficiency of their use, without losses through runoff or leaching, should be enhanced. In this regard, it should be noted that the African continent, with the possible exception of the Congo Basin, is largely covered with areas that are not very suitable for intensive agriculture, but are well adapted to extensive livestock farming. In other words, the continent can easily produce beef, sheep or goat meat, but at a slow pace, due to the low energy value of natural pastures. This should be taken into account in agricultural development policies.
Promoting technologies and their synergy and improvement can play a decisive role in achieving future global food security. Engineers have developed tillage techniques that are more respectful of soil structure. They reduce erosion and promote carbon storage in the soil. On the other hand, legumes can be valuable allies in enriching soil with nitrogen without the need for nitrogen fertilizers, due to their root structures that host rhizobial saprophytic organisms capable of transforming atmospheric nitrogen into plant-available nitrogen. Satellite technologies, on the other hand, provide valuable information to optimize land use in time and space. However, one of the greatest advances will probably come from revolutions in the genetic sciences. It is now possible to rewrite short excerpts of an organism’s genetic code to try to improve its performance thanks to CRISPR-Cas9 technology. On the other hand, gene editing is now reaching unprecedented levels of speed and execution.
Figure 1.4.National cereal production in the world as a function of nitrogen application per hectare (from FAO (2020)).
The first approach – genome rewriting – is likely to face many obstacles due to critiques – rightly or wrongly – of the use of genetically modified organisms. However, the technology is worth considering for the benefits it could bring (Rao and Wang 2021). For example, the photosynthetic efficiency of plants – currently close to 1% – could be improved. However, it would certainly raise the question of the risk of losing control over the propagation of plants that have become more competitive with their natural relatives. This simple example shows the caution with which these technologies must be used. Genomic editing, on the other hand, should make it possible to rapidly identify individuals – animals or plants – with a competitive advantage over their congeners. As founders of new lines, they would be endowed with resistance to biological or abiotic factors that are harmful to productivity. We can think of resistance to drought, high temperatures or critical diseases. However, such individuals could also generate lines that farmers or breeders would not have more control over in the case of genetic escape.
