1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Brewster's Millions," George Barr McCutcheon weaves a delightful and satirical tale that explores the intersection of wealth, responsibility, and human nature. The novel follows the humorous escapades of Montague Brewster, a struggling young man who unexpectedly inherits a fortune with a peculiar stipulation: he must expend a million dollars within a year without acquiring any lasting assets. McCutcheon's writing showcases his keen wit and skillful character development, reflecting the early 20th-century American literary context that was increasingly fascinated by the glitz and pitfalls of newfound riches and social ambition. George Barr McCutcheon, an American author and playwright, was well-known for his engaging storytelling and sharp social observations. His experiences in various professions, including newspaper reporting and acting, enriched his understanding of human greed and the absurdities of wealth. "Brewster's Millions," published in 1902, emerged at a time when the American Dream, with its promise of wealth and success, was both glorified and critiqued, positioning McCutcheon as a significant voice in the genre of social satire. This novel is a must-read for anyone intrigued by the complexities of wealth and its impact on human relationships. McCutcheon's blend of humor and social commentary not only entertains but also invites readers to contemplate what it truly means to be wealthy. Whether you are a fan of classical literature or modern satire, "Brewster's Millions" offers timeless insights that resonate with the challenges of financial success and moral integrity. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
Brewster's Millions
Table of Contents
Introduction
When the only path to a vast inheritance demands meticulous, public extravagance, a young man must spend under pressure, perform for a skeptical audience, endure the distortions of gossip and gratitude, weigh loyalty against convenience, and decide whether integrity can survive the corrosive optics of wealth, proving that money is never merely currency but a stage on which ambition, affection, and self-respect collide under an unforgiving clock, as every dollar spent threatens to alienate allies, attract opportunists, and obscure the very purpose of the quest.
Brewster's Millions is a comic novel of social satire by American author George Barr McCutcheon, first published in 1902 at the turn of the twentieth century, when rapid urban growth and new fortunes reshaped public life in the United States. The story unfolds in a cosmopolitan, money-conscious milieu that reflects the period's fascination with wealth, etiquette, and status. McCutcheon's narrative operates within popular fiction traditions of the time while keeping a brisk, contemporary-feeling pace. Readers encounter drawing rooms, clubs, offices, and streets where appearance and rumor matter as much as ledgers, grounding the book in a recognizably modern, if historically situated, world.
At its center is Montgomery Brewster, an unassuming young man who unexpectedly becomes the heir to a significant sum and then learns of a second, larger fortune that he can claim only if he spends the first within a fixed period under strict rules and in complete secrecy. The conditions require precision rather than waste, forcing him to make choices that look reckless but must be carefully justified. The clock sets a propulsive rhythm as entertainments, investments, and acts of generosity are weighed for their consequences, and the protagonist discovers that disposal can be as complicated as accumulation.
McCutcheon crafts the story with a light, urbane touch, balancing farcical sequences with pointed observation. The voice is genial yet incisive, attentive to the rituals of polite society and the mechanics of finance without becoming technical. Scenes move quickly, the prose favoring clarity and momentum, and the dialogue-driven tempo enhances the feeling of a man forever explaining, deflecting, or improvising. The novel invites laughter at its contrivances while steadily sharpening its questions, using the deadline as an engine that turns social calls, banquets, and business ventures into comic set pieces guided by a serious curiosity about motives and outcomes.
Beyond its entertaining premise, the book examines what money signals and obscures: the line between generosity and display, the price of reputation, and the way rules can both channel and distort ethical intention. It probes how society reads expenditure as character, how suspicion clings to success, and how friendship strains under the weight of appearances. The challenge also exposes tensions between prudence and daring, experience and ephemerality, and private purpose and public performance. By making spending an ordeal that must leave no tangible reward, the narrative questions common assumptions about value, achievement, and the measurements by which lives are judged.
These concerns resonate today, when conspicuous consumption, strategic philanthropy, and the pressures of image-making remain central to public and private life. Brewster's dilemma anticipates modern debates about accountability, optics, and the metrics that govern status—from balance sheets to social proof—showing how incentives shape behavior as powerfully as ideals. Readers may recognize the anxiety of being watched, the paradox of doing good under suspicion, and the difficulty of aligning intention with effect. The novel offers a witty case study in the psychology of spending, timely in any era that asks individuals to perform success while navigating rules they did not write.
Approached as both a lively entertainment and a study of values, Brewster's Millions rewards readers with a brisk, witty journey driven by an irresistible constraint. Without revealing outcomes, it is enough to say that the obstacles multiply, the misunderstandings are often delightful, and the decisions grow more exacting as the deadline approaches. The book's enduring appeal—reflected in its long popularity and frequent adaptations—owes to the elegant simplicity of its central test and the humane curiosity with which McCutcheon treats it. For contemporary readers, it offers laughter, insight, and a refreshing reminder that how we spend is a story we tell.
Synopsis
Brewster’s Millions follows Monty Brewster, a young New Yorker of modest means who unexpectedly inherits a sizable fortune from a relative. The windfall thrusts him into a new social sphere, where comfort, prestige, and attention come easily. At first, the novel sketches his everyday life and friendships, establishing his sensibilities and the expectations of the society around him. This opening sets the stage for a larger challenge that will test his judgment and endurance. The tone remains brisk and observational as Brewster moves from ordinary routines to the logistics of managing sudden wealth, foreshadowing the tensions between appearance, responsibility, and personal resolve.
Soon after receiving his initial inheritance, Brewster learns of a second, far greater bequest that is conditional. To qualify, he must spend his present fortune within a set period, under detailed rules designed to make wastefulness surprisingly difficult. He must end with no assets beyond specific allowances, disclose nothing about the challenge, and keep meticulous accounts subject to audit. Donations and gambling are strictly limited, and he cannot destroy valuables simply to be rid of them. This proposition reframes his circumstances from indulgence to strategy, turning spending into a disciplined undertaking, and launching a countdown that drives the novel’s plot and tension.
Brewster organizes his affairs like a campaign. He rents expensive quarters, hires staff, and engages a secretary and accountants to track every transaction. He seeks counsel from attorneys who oversee compliance without revealing the underlying motive to outsiders. Day-to-day life becomes a series of calculated purchases and planned expenses: clothing, memberships, entertainment, and services that produce no enduring property. What appears to be carefree extravagance is managed with rules and ledgers. As the social circle around him expands, acquaintances assume ordinary motives for his lifestyle, while Brewster, bound to secrecy, treats each decision as both an indulgence and a step toward an invisible goal.
The constraints on charity quickly create friction. Because gifts and donations are capped, Brewster cannot simply give away funds to accelerate his schedule, even when worthy causes present themselves. His refusals appear cold or capricious, and rumors spread that he prefers spectacle to substance. Press commentary and drawing-room conversations turn skeptical, casting him as frivolous or calculating depending on the observer. Unable to explain himself, he courts disapproval while trying to obey conditions he did not choose. The portrayal emphasizes how public judgments, formed without context, can obscure private obligations, and how a visible lifestyle may mask a demanding project with little room for sentiment.
Determined to spend without owning, Brewster embraces risky undertakings he expects will fail. He patronizes ambitious theatrical ventures, indulges in speculative investments, and enters enterprises that seem destined to drain funds. Instead, some endeavors succeed unexpectedly, generating profits that must be spent anew under the same restrictions. A show draws crowds, a stock rises, or a venture survives the odds, each return resetting his progress backward. The narrative treats these reversals as structural obstacles rather than comic accidents, reinforcing the paradox: in trying to lose money while following rules, Brewster keeps making more, and the task becomes more complex the closer he thinks he is to relief.
He multiplies experiences that leave no residue: extravagant travel, lavish entertainments, and costly conveniences. He finances spectacles, subsidizes clubs, and underwrites sporting contingents, all while ensuring he retains no lasting claims. His prominence brings an unhelpful side effect: gifts, honors, and unsolicited opportunities that add to his burdens if accepted. He must decline tokens and steer clear of clever bargains, which would constitute assets. Even generosity from others can undermine him. The story explores how social momentum resists controlled dissipation, and how the public nature of spending attracts complications. Each new connection threatens compliance, requiring ingenuity to convert admiration and attention back into permissible expense.
Personal relationships add further strain. Friends fear he is courting ruin for show. Advisers, seeing only fragments, push their own remedies. Opportunists cluster, some seeking advantage, others hoping to attach to his notoriety. A quiet ally helps tally the ledgers and interpret the rules with patience, while a romantic attachment becomes clouded by distrust and appearances. Because Brewster cannot divulge his rationale, misunderstandings deepen. Invitations he declines look ungrateful; favors he grants seem arbitrary. The narrative tightens around his social circle, measuring the cost of discretion as carefully as the cost of dinners and voyages, and testing his ability to separate loyalty from pressure.
As the deadline nears, the arithmetic grows unforgiving. Returns, interest, and even unforeseen windfalls threaten to undo months of careful outlay. Brewster invents legitimate sinks for money that leave no residue: services, short-term rentals, and temporary ventures that dissolve on schedule. Accountants monitor every category to avoid prohibited forms of loss or giving. The press scrutinizes his movements, while acquaintances speculate about his motives. Exhaustion and urgency color his choices, yet the rules remain rigid. The final stretch becomes a rapid succession of calculated moves and sudden setbacks, with the outcome dependent on timing and luck as much as on discipline and planning.
Brewster’s Millions uses a simple premise to examine wealth as a test of character rather than an easy blessing. By turning spending into a constraint-ridden task, it highlights the difference between display and purpose, and the difficulty of balancing private duty with public perception. The narrative follows his efforts without moralizing, inviting readers to consider how rules can channel behavior, how society interprets extravagance, and what money can and cannot buy. Without revealing the resolution, the book sustains tension over success or failure, underscoring that reputation, relationships, and integrity remain at stake even when fortunes rise and fall.
Historical Context
Brewster’s Millions is set in the United States at the turn of the twentieth century, with New York City as its principal stage and transatlantic travel to Europe as a recurring backdrop. The milieu is one of Fifth Avenue mansions, private clubs, grand hotels such as the Waldorf–Astoria (consolidated in 1897 at Fifth Avenue and 34th Street), and restaurants like Delmonico’s. Wall Street’s proximity shapes the social tone: finance and society intermingle in drawing rooms and brokerage offices. Steamship lines such as Cunard and White Star facilitated swift crossings to London and Paris, where American elites sought validation. The novel’s 1902 publication places it squarely amid late Gilded Age opulence and emergent Progressive Era unease about wealth and power.
The millionaire class of the Gilded Age (circa 1870–1900) forms the decisive historical frame. Standard Oil, organized by John D. Rockefeller in 1870 in Cleveland and later New York, consolidated refining and distribution, while Andrew Carnegie’s steel empire, headquartered in Pittsburgh, culminated in the 1901 sale to J. P. Morgan, creating U.S. Steel, the first billion-dollar corporation. New York high society, policed by Ward McAllister’s famed “Four Hundred” (popularized in 1892) and anchored by Mrs. Astor, set rigid admission standards, mirrored in Newport’s palatial “cottages.” This environment normalized extravagant entertaining, lavish wardrobes, opera boxes, and conditioned philanthropy. The novel’s premise—a young man compelled to spend a fortune amid exacting social observation—draws directly on this culture, staging conspicuous consumption as a test of status and belonging. Brewster’s parties, suites, and travel echo the era’s luxury rituals while exposing their economic logic and social gatekeeping.
Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century financial volatility is another shaping force. The Panic of 1893, precipitated by railroad overexpansion and the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad’s February 1893 collapse, triggered bank failures and unemployment that lingered into 1894–1896. On May 9, 1901, the Northern Pacific stock corner erupted in a market panic until J. P. Morgan and James J. Hill negotiated peace, revealing how private financiers stabilized public markets. Bucket shops, margin accounts, and the stock ticker encouraged speculative habits. In the novel, Brewster’s obligation to spend rather than invest, and to avoid ending with appreciable assets, constantly collides with a market prone to unexpected gains. His dealings with brokers and the risk of accidental profits dramatize the era’s speculative temptations and the fragility of paper wealth.
The early Progressive Era’s political response to corporate power contextualizes the book’s skepticism. The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 introduced federal constraints on combinations in restraint of trade. Theodore Roosevelt, assuming the presidency in September 1901, pursued trust-busting, culminating in Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904), which dissolved a railroad holding combine backed by J. P. Morgan. The Department of Commerce and Labor (1903) and the Elkins Act (1903) signaled new regulatory ambitions. Concurrent muckraking—Ida M. Tarbell’s investigative history of Standard Oil began in McClure’s Magazine in 1902—shaped public opinion. The novel’s contrived inheritance conditions and the spectacle of waste pose a question aligned with Progressive scrutiny: what social value do private fortunes serve under weak oversight?
A contemporaneous philanthropic culture complicates the period’s image of wealth. Andrew Carnegie’s “The Gospel of Wealth” (1889) argued that millionaires should administer surplus riches for the public good, funding thousands of libraries and institutions. John D. Rockefeller established the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York in 1901. Urban reformers built settlement houses, notably Jane Addams’s Hull House in Chicago (1889), and Charity Organization Societies (e.g., New York, 1882) professionalized aid. In the novel, constraints on Brewster’s gifts and the requirement to have little to show at the end subvert straightforward largesse, reflecting debates over effective giving versus ostentatious charity and highlighting the tension between public benefit and private display.
Rapid urbanization and the rise of a consumer-leisure economy saturate the setting. New York’s population exceeded 3 million by 1900, supported by streetcars and elevated railways, with the subway opening shortly after in 1904. Department stores such as R. H. Macy & Co. shifted to a vast Herald Square flagship in 1902, while the Waldorf–Astoria hosted opulent balls that defined social calendars. The Metropolitan Opera House (opened 1883 at 39th Street) symbolized cultural prestige. Electric lighting, luxury hotels, and club life created new avenues for spending and display. Brewster’s hiring of suites, staging of entertainments, and patronage of urban services exemplify how the city enabled rapid, public outlays that converted money into social visibility.
A transatlantic elite milieu—and America’s global turn—frames the novel’s travel scenes. After the Spanish–American War (1898), the United States annexed territories and projected power abroad, while wealthy Americans frequented Europe for cultural capital. Anglo-American marriages, such as Consuelo Vanderbilt’s 1895 union with the Duke of Marlborough, epitomized the exchange of American fortunes for Old World titles. Regular steamship service by Cunard and White Star (e.g., RMS Campania and RMS Lucania, launched 1893) made London and Paris seasonal extensions of New York society. Brewster’s European expenditures and cosmopolitan itineraries reflect this pattern, portraying wealth as mobile and internationally performative in an age when prestige circulated as readily as capital.
As social and political critique, the novel transforms a spending mandate into a case study of conspicuous consumption’s moral incoherence. It exposes how gatekeeping elites reward spectacle over productive contribution, how finance can arbitrarily magnify or negate effort, and how charity may become theater rather than relief. By dramatizing restrictions that make prudent investment or durable philanthropy suspect, it challenges the period’s confidence in private stewardship of public good. The book thereby underscores anxieties about plutocracy, class stratification, and municipal corruption, anticipating Progressive demands for regulation and accountability while registering the human dislocation produced by an economy organized around status and display.
