I.
Back of the Virginia Clemenses is
a dim procession of ancestors stretching back to Noah's time.
According to tradition, some of them were pirates and slavers in
Elizabeth's time. But this is no discredit to them, for so were
Drake and Hawkins and the others. It was a respectable trade, then,
and monarchs were partners in it. In my time I have had desires to
be a pirate myself. The reader—if he will look deep down in his
secret heart, will find
—but never mind what he will find
there; I am not writing his Autobiography, but mine. Later,
according to tradition, one of the procession was Ambassador to
Spain in the time of James I, or of Charles I, and married there
and sent down a strain of Spanish blood to warm us up. Also,
according to tradition, this one or another—Geoffrey Clement, by
name—helped to sentence Charles to death.
I have not examined into these
traditions myself, partly because I was indolent, and partly
because I was so busy polishing up this end of the line and trying
to make it showy; but the other Clemenses claim that they have made
the examination and that it stood the test. Therefore I have always
taken for granted that I did help Charles out of his troubles, by
ancestral proxy. My instincts have persuaded me, too. Whenever we
have a strong and persistent and ineradicable instinct, we may be
sure that it is not original with us, but inherited—inherited from
away back, and hardened and perfected by the petrifying influence
of time. Now I have been always and unchangingly bitter against
Charles, and I am quite certain that this feeling trickled down to
me through the veins of my forebears from the heart of that judge;
for it is not my disposition to be bitter against people on my own
personal account I am not bitter against Jeffreys. I ought to be,
but I am not. It indicates that my ancestors of James II's time
were indifferent to him; I do not know why; I never could make it
out; but that is what it indicates. And I have always felt friendly
toward Satan. Of course that is ancestral; it must be in the blood,
for I could not have originated it.
... And so, by the testimony of
instinct, backed by the assertions of Clemenses who said they had
examined the records, I have always been
obliged to believe that Geoffrey
Clement the martyr-maker was an ancestor of mine, and to regard him
with favor, and in fact pride. This has not had a good effect upon
me, for it has made me vain, and that is a fault. It has made me
set myself above people who were less fortunate in their ancestry
than I, and has moved me to take them down a peg, upon occasion,
and say things to them which hurt them before company.
A case of the kind happened in
Berlin several years ago. William Walter Phelps was our Minister at
the Emperor's Court, then, and one evening he had me to dinner to
meet Count S., a cabinet minister. This nobleman was of long and
illustrious descent. Of course I wanted to let out the fact that I
had some ancestors, too; but I did not want to pull them out of
their graves by the ears, and I never could seem to get the chance
to work them in in a way that would look sufficiently casual. I
suppose Phelps was in the same difficulty. In fact he looked
distraught, now and then—just as a person looks who wants to
uncover an ancestor purely by accident, and cannot think of a way
that will seem accidental enough. But at last, after dinner, he
made a try. He took us about his drawing-room, showing us the
pictures, and finally stopped before a rude and ancient engraving.
It was a picture of the court that tried Charles I. There was a
pyramid of judges in Puritan slouch hats, and below them three
bare-headed secretaries seated at a table. Mr. Phelps put his
finger upon one of the three, and said with exulting
indifference—
"An ancestor of mine."
I put my finger on a judge, and
retorted with scathing languidness— "Ancestor of mine. But it is a
small matter. I have others."
It was not noble in me to do it.
I have always regretted it since. But it landed him. I wonder how
he felt? However, it made no difference in our friendship, which
shows that he was fine and high, notwithstanding the humbleness of
his origin. And it was also creditable in me, too, that I could
overlook it. I made no change in my bearing toward him, but always
treated him as an equal.
But it was a hard night for me in
one way. Mr. Phelps thought I was the guest of honor, and so did
Count S.; but I didn't, for there was nothing in
my invitation to indicate it. It
was just a friendly offhand note, on a card. By the time dinner was
announced Phelps was himself in a state of doubt. Something had to
be done; and it was not a handy time for explanations. He tried to
get me to go out with him, but I held back; then he tried S., and
he also declined. There was another guest, but there was no trouble
about him. We finally went out in a pile. There was a decorous
plunge for seats, and I got the one at Mr. Phelps's left, the Count
captured the one facing Phelps, and the other guest had to take the
place of honor, since he could not help himself. We returned to the
drawing-room in the original disorder. I had new shoes on, and they
were tight. At eleven I was privately crying; I couldn't help it,
the pain was so cruel. Conversation had been dead for an hour. S.
had been due at the bedside of a dying official ever since half
past nine. At last we all rose by one blessed impulse and went down
to the street door without explanations—in a pile, and no
precedence; and so, parted.
The evening had its defects;
still, I got my ancestor in, and was satisfied.
Among the Virginian Clemenses
were Jere. (already mentioned), and Sherrard. Jere. Clemens had a
wide reputation as a good pistol-shot, and once it enabled him to
get on the friendly side of some drummers when they wouldn't have
paid any attention to mere smooth words and arguments. He was out
stumping the State at the time. The drummers were grouped in front
of the stand, and had been hired by the opposition to drum while he
made his speech. When he was ready to begin, he got out his
revolver and laid it before him, and said in his soft, silky
way—
"I do not wish to hurt anybody,
and shall try not to; but I have got just a bullet apiece for those
six drums, and if you should want to play on them, don't stand
behind them."
Sherrard Clemens was a Republican
Congressman from West Virginia in the war days, and then went out
to St. Louis, where the James Clemens branch lived, and still
lives, and there he became a warm rebel. This was after the war. At
the time that he was a Republican I was a rebel; but by the time he
had become a rebel I was become (temporarily) a Republican. The
Clemenses have always done the best they could to keep the
political balances level, no matter how much it might inconvenience
them. I did not
know what had become of Sherrard
Clemens; but once I introduced Senator Hawley to a Republican mass
meeting in New England, and then I got a bitter letter from
Sherrard from St. Louis. He said that the Republicans of the
North—no, the "mudsills of the North"—had swept away the old
aristocracy of the South with fire and sword, and it ill became me,
an aristocrat by blood, to train with that kind of swine. Did I
forget that I was a Lambton?
That was a reference to my
mother's side of the house. As I have already said, she was a
Lambton—Lambton with a p, for some of the American Lamptons could
not spell very well in early times, and so the name suffered at
their hands. She was a native of Kentucky, and married my father in
Lexington in 1823, when she was twenty years old and he twenty-
four. Neither of them had an overplus of property. She brought him
two or three negroes, but nothing else, I think. They removed to
the remote and secluded village of Jamestown, in the mountain
solitudes of east Tennessee. There their first crop of children was
born, but as I was of a later vintage I do not remember anything
about it. I was postponed— postponed to Missouri. Missouri was an
unknown new State and needed attractions.
I think that my eldest brother,
Orion, my sisters Pamela and Margaret, and my brother Benjamin were
born in Jamestown. There may have been others, but as to that I am
not sure. It was a great lift for that little village to have my
parents come there. It was hoped that they would stay, so that it
would become a city. It was supposed that they would stay. And so
there was a boom; but by and by they went away, and prices went
down, and it was many years before Jamestown got another start. I
have written about Jamestown in the "Gilded Age," a book of mine,
but it was from hearsay, not from personal knowledge. My father
left a fine estate behind him in the region round about
Jamestown—75,000 acres.[2] When he died in 1847 he had owned it
about twenty years. The taxes were almost nothing (five dollars a
year for the whole), and he had always paid them regularly and kept
his title perfect. He had always said that the land would not
become valuable in his time, but that it would be a commodious
provision for his children some day. It contained coal, copper,
iron and timber, and he said that in the course of time railways
would pierce to that region, and then the property would be
property in fact as well as in name. It also
produced a wild grape of a
promising sort. He had sent some samples to Nicholas Longworth, of
Cincinnati, to get his judgment upon them, and Mr. Longworth had
said that they would make as good wine as his Catawbas. The land
contained all these riches; and also oil, but my father did not
know that, and of course in those early days he would have cared
nothing about it if he had known it. The oil was not discovered
until about 1895. I wish I owned a couple of acres of the land now.
In which case I would not be writing Autobiographies for a living.
My father's dying charge was, "Cling to the land and wait; let
nothing beguile it away from you." My mother's favorite cousin,
James Lampton, who figures in the "Gilded Age" as "Colonel
Sellers," always said of that land—and said it with blazing
enthusiasm, too,—"There's millions in it—millions!" It is true that
he always said that about everything—and was always mistaken, too;
but this time he was right; which shows that a man who goes around
with a prophecy-gun ought never to get discouraged; if he will keep
up his heart and fire at everything he sees, he is bound to hit
something by and by.
Many persons regarded "Colonel
Sellers" as a fiction, an invention, an extravagant impossibility,
and did me the honor to call him a "creation"; but they were
mistaken. I merely put him on paper as he was; he was not a person
who could be exaggerated. The incidents which looked most
extravagant, both in the book and on the stage, were not inventions
of mine but were facts of his life; and I was present when they
were developed. John T. Raymond's audiences used to come near to
dying with laughter over the turnip-eating scene; but, extravagant
as the scene was, it was faithful to the facts, in all its absurd
details. The thing happened in Lampton's own house, and I was
present. In fact I was myself the guest who ate the turnips. In the
hands of a great actor that piteous scene would have dimmed any
manly spectator's eyes with tears, and racked his ribs apart with
laughter at the same time. But Raymond was great in humorous
portrayal only. In that he was superb, he was wonderful—in a word,
great; in all things else he was a pigmy of the pigmies.
The real Colonel Sellers, as I
knew him in James Lampton, was a pathetic and beautiful spirit, a
manly man, a straight and honorable man, a man with a big, foolish,
unselfish heart in his bosom, a man born to be loved; and he was
loved by all his friends, and by his family worshipped. It is
the
right word. To them he was but
little less than a god. The real Colonel Sellers was never on the
stage. Only half of him was there. Raymond could not play the other
half of him; it was above his level. That half was made up of
qualities of which Raymond was wholly destitute. For Raymond was
not a manly man, he was not an honorable man nor an honest one, he
was empty and selfish and vulgar and ignorant and silly, and there
was a vacancy in him where his heart should have been. There was
only one man who could have played the whole of Colonel Sellers,
and that was Frank Mayo.[3]
It is a world of surprises. They
fall, too, where one is least expecting them. When I introduced
Sellers into the book, Charles Dudley Warner, who was writing the
story with me, proposed a change of Seller's Christian name. Ten
years before, in a remote corner of the West, he had come across a
man named Eschol Sellers, and he thought that Eschol was just the
right and fitting name for our Sellers, since it was odd and quaint
and all that. I liked the idea, but I said that that man might turn
up and object. But Warner said it couldn't happen; that he was
doubtless dead by this time, a man with a name like that couldn't
live long; and be he dead or alive we must have the name, it was
exactly the right one and we couldn't do without it. So the change
was made. Warner's man was a farmer in a cheap and humble way. When
the book had been out a week, a college-bred gentleman of courtly
manners and ducal upholstery arrived in Hartford in a sultry state
of mind and with a libel suit in his eye, and his name was Eschol
Sellers! He had never heard of the other one, and had never been
within a thousand miles of him. This damaged aristocrat's programme
was quite definite and businesslike: the American Publishing
Company must suppress the edition as far as printed, and change the
name in the plates, or stand a suit for $10,000. He carried away
the Company's promise and many apologies, and we changed the name
back to Colonel Mulberry Sellers, in the plates. Apparently there
is nothing that cannot happen. Even the existence of two unrelated
men wearing the impossible name of Eschol Sellers is a possible
thing.
James Lampton floated, all his
days, in a tinted mist of magnificent dreams, and died at last
without seeing one of them realized. I saw him last in 1884, when
it had been twenty-six years since I ate the basin of raw turnips
and washed them down with a bucket of water in his house. He
was
become old and white-headed, but
he entered to me in the same old breezy way of his earlier life,
and he was all there, yet—not a detail wanting: the happy light in
his eye, the abounding hope in his heart, the persuasive tongue,
the miracle-breeding imagination—they were all there; and before I
could turn around he was polishing up his Aladdin's lamp and
flashing the secret riches of the world before me. I said to
myself, "I did not overdraw him by a shade, I set him down as he
was; and he is the same man to-day. Cable will recognize him." I
asked him to excuse me a moment, and ran into the next room, which
was Cable's; Cable and I were stumping the Union on a reading tour.
I said—
"I am going to leave your door
open, so that you can listen. There is a man in there who is
interesting."
I went back and asked Lampton
what he was doing now. He began to tell me of a "small venture" he
had begun in New Mexico through his son; "only a little thing—a
mere trifle—partly to amuse my leisure, partly to keep my capital
from lying idle, but mainly to develop the boy—develop the boy;
fortune's wheel is ever revolving, he may have to work for his
living some day—as strange things have happened in this world. But
it's only a little thing—a mere trifle, as I said."
And so it was—as he began it. But
under his deft hands it grew, and blossomed, and spread—oh, beyond
imagination. At the end of half an hour he finished; finished with
the remark, uttered in an adorably languid manner:
"Yes, it is but a trifle, as
things go nowadays—a bagatelle—but amusing. It passes the time. The
boy thinks great things of it, but he is young, you know, and
imaginative; lacks the experience which comes of handling large
affairs, and which tempers the fancy and perfects the judgment. I
suppose there's a couple of millions in it, possibly three, but not
more, I think; still, for a boy, you know, just starting in life,
it is not bad. I should not want him to make a fortune—let that
come later. It could turn his head, at his time of life, and in
many ways be a damage to him."
Then he said something about his
having left his pocketbook lying on the table in the main
drawing-room at home, and about its being after banking hours, now,
and—
I stopped him, there, and begged
him to honor Cable and me by being our guest at the lecture—with as
many friends as might be willing to do us the like honor. He
accepted. And he thanked me as a prince might who had granted us a
grace. The reason I stopped his speech about the tickets was
because I saw that he was going to ask me to furnish them to him
and let him pay next day; and I knew that if he made the debt he
would pay it if he had to pawn his clothes. After a little further
chat he shook hands heartily and affectionately, and took his
leave. Cable put his head in at the door, and said—
"That was Colonel Sellers."
MARK TWAIN.
(To be Continued.)
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Copyright, 1906, by Harper
& Brothers. All Rights Reserved.
[2] Correction. 1906: it was
above 100,000, it appears.
[3] Raymond was playing "Colonel
Sellers" in 1876 and along there. About twenty years later Mayo
dramatized "Pudd'nhead Wilson" and played the title role
delightfully.
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DXCIX.
SEPTEMBER 21, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—
II.
BY MARK TWAIN.
II.
My experiences as an author began
early in 1867. I came to New York from San Francisco in the first
month of that year and presently Charles H. Webb, whom I had known
in San Francisco as a reporter on The Bulletin, and afterward
editor of The Californian, suggested that I publish a volume of
sketches. I had but a slender reputation to publish it on, but I
was charmed and excited by the suggestion and quite willing to
venture it if some industrious person would save me the trouble of
gathering the sketches together. I was loath to do it myself, for
from the beginning of my sojourn in this world there was a
persistent vacancy in me where the industry ought to be. ("Ought to
was" is better, perhaps, though the most of the authorities differ
as to this.)
Webb said I had some reputation
in the Atlantic States, but I knew quite well that it must be of a
very attenuated sort. What there was of it rested upon the story of
"The Jumping Frog." When Artemus Ward passed through California on
a lecturing tour, in 1865 or '66, I told him the "Jumping Frog"
story, in San Francisco, and he asked me to write it out and send
it to his publisher, Carleton, in New York, to be used in padding
out a small book which Artemus had prepared for the press and which
needed some more stuffing to make it big enough for the price which
was to be charged for it.
It reached Carleton in time, but
he didn't think much of it, and was not willing to go to the
typesetting expense of adding it to the book. He did not put it in
the waste-basket, but made Henry Clapp a present of it, and Clapp
used it to help out the funeral of his dying literary journal, The
Saturday Press. "The Jumping Frog" appeared in the last number of
that paper, was the most joyous feature of the obsequies, and was
at once copied in the newspapers of America and England. It
certainly had a wide celebrity, and it still had it at the time
that I am speaking of—but I was aware that it was only the frog
that was celebrated. It wasn't I. I was still an obscurity.
Webb undertook to collate the
sketches. He performed this office, then handed the result to me,
and I went to Carleton's establishment with it. I approached a
clerk and he bent eagerly over the counter to inquire into my
needs; but when he found that I had come to sell a book and not to
buy one, his temperature fell sixty degrees, and the old-gold
intrenchments in the roof of my mouth contracted three-quarters of
an inch and my teeth fell out. I meekly asked the privilege of a
word with Mr. Carleton, and was coldly informed that he was in his
private office. Discouragements and difficulties followed, but
after a while I got by the frontier and entered the holy of holies.
Ah, now I remember how I managed it! Webb had made an appointment
for me with Carleton; otherwise I never should have gotten over
that frontier. Carleton rose and said brusquely and
aggressively,
"Well, what can I do for
you?"
I reminded him that I was there
by appointment to offer him my book for publication. He began to
swell, and went on swelling and swelling and swelling until he had
reached the dimensions of a god of about the second or third
degree. Then the fountains of his great deep were broken up, and
for two or three minutes I couldn't see him for the rain. It was
words, only words, but they fell so densely that they darkened the
atmosphere. Finally he made an imposing sweep with his right hand,
which comprehended the whole room and said,
"Books—look at those shelves!
Every one of them is loaded with books that are waiting for
publication. Do I want any more? Excuse me, I don't. Good
morning."
Twenty-one years elapsed before I
saw Carleton again. I was then sojourning with my family at the
Schweitzerhof, in Luzerne. He called on me, shook hands cordially,
and said at once, without any preliminaries,
"I am substantially an obscure
person, but I have at least one distinction to my credit of such
colossal dimensions that it entitles me to immortality— to wit: I
refused a book of yours, and for this I stand without competitor as
the prize ass of the nineteenth century."
It was a most handsome apology,
and I told him so, and said it was a long- delayed revenge but was
sweeter to me than any other that could be devised; that during the
lapsed twenty-one years I had in fancy taken his life several times
every year, and always in new and increasingly cruel and inhuman
ways, but that now I was pacified, appeased, happy, even jubilant;
and that thenceforth I should hold him my true and valued friend
and never kill him again.
I reported my adventure to Webb,
and he bravely said that not all the Carletons in the universe
should defeat that book; he would publish it himself on a ten per
cent. royalty. And so he did. He brought it out in blue and gold,
and made a very pretty little book of it, I think he named it "The
Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County, and Other Sketches,"
price
$1.25. He made the plates and
printed and bound the book through a job- printing house, and
published it through the American News Company.
In June I sailed in the Quaker
City Excursion. I returned in November, and in Washington found a
letter from Elisha Bliss, of the American Publishing Company of
Hartford, offering me five per cent. royalty on a book which should
recount the adventures of the Excursion. In lieu of the royalty, I
was offered the alternative of ten thousand dollars cash upon
delivery of the manuscript. I consulted A. D. Richardson and he
said "take the royalty." I followed his advice and closed with
Bliss. By my contract I was to deliver the manuscript in July of
1868. I wrote the book in San Francisco and delivered the
manuscript within contract time. Bliss provided a multitude of
illustrations for the book, and then stopped work on it. The
contract date for the issue went by, and there was no explanation
of this. Time drifted along and still there was no explanation. I
was
lecturing all over the country;
and about thirty times a day, on an average, I was trying to answer
this conundrum:
"When is your book coming
out?"
I got tired of inventing new
answers to that question, and by and by I got horribly tired of the
question itself. Whoever asked it became my enemy at once, and I
was usually almost eager to make that appear.
As soon as I was free of the
lecture-field I hastened to Hartford to make inquiries. Bliss said
that the fault was not his; that he wanted to publish the book but
the directors of his Company were staid old fossils and were afraid
of it. They had examined the book, and the majority of them were of
the opinion that there were places in it of a humorous character.
Bliss said the house had never published a book that had a
suspicion like that attaching to it, and that the directors were
afraid that a departure of this kind would seriously injure the
house's reputation; that he was tied hand and foot, and was not
permitted to carry out his contract. One of the directors, a Mr.
Drake—at least he was the remains of what had once been a Mr.
Drake—invited me to take a ride with him in his buggy, and I went
along. He was a pathetic old relic, and his ways and his talk were
also pathetic. He had a delicate purpose in view and it took him
some time to hearten himself sufficiently to carry it out, but at
last he accomplished it. He explained the house's difficulty and
distress, as Bliss had already explained it. Then he frankly threw
himself and the house upon my mercy and begged me to take away "The
Innocents Abroad" and release the concern from the contract. I said
I wouldn't—and so ended the interview and the buggy excursion. Then
I warned Bliss that he must get to work or I should make trouble.
He acted upon the warning, and set up the book and I read the
proofs. Then there was another long wait and no explanation. At
last toward the end of July (1869, I think), I lost patience and
telegraphed Bliss that if the book was not on sale in twenty-four
hours I should bring suit for damages.
That ended the trouble. Half a
dozen copies were bound and placed on sale within the required
time. Then the canvassing began, and went briskly forward. In nine
months the book took the publishing house out of debt, advanced its
stock from twenty-five to two hundred, and left seventy
thousand dollars profit to the
good. It was Bliss that told me this—but if it was true, it was the
first time that he had told the truth in sixty-five years. He was
born in 1804.
III.
... This was in 1849. I was
fourteen years old, then. We were still living in Hannibal,
Missouri, on the banks of the Mississippi, in the new "frame" house
built by my father five years before. That is, some of us lived in
the new part, the rest in the old part back of it—the "L." In the
autumn my sister gave a party, and invited all the marriageable
young people of the village. I was too young for this society, and
was too bashful to mingle with young ladies, anyway, therefore I
was not invited—at least not for the whole evening. Ten minutes of
it was to be my whole share. I was to do the part of a bear in a
small fairy play. I was to be disguised all over in a close-fitting
brown hairy stuff proper for a bear. About half past ten I was told
to go to my room and put on this disguise, and be ready in half an
hour. I started, but changed my mind; for I wanted to practise a
little, and that room was very small. I crossed over to the large
unoccupied house on the corner of Main and Hill streets,[4] unaware
that a dozen of the young people were also going there to dress for
their parts. I took the little black slave boy, Sandy, with me, and
we selected a roomy and empty chamber on the second floor. We
entered it talking, and this gave a couple of half- dressed young
ladies an opportunity to take refuge behind a screen undiscovered.
Their gowns and things were hanging on hooks behind the door, but I
did not see them; it was Sandy that shut the door, but all his
heart was in the theatricals, and he was as unlikely to notice them
as I was myself.
That was a rickety screen, with
many holes in it, but as I did not know there were girls behind it,
I was not disturbed by that detail. If I had known, I could not
have undressed in the flood of cruel moonlight that was pouring in
at the curtainless windows; I should have died of shame.
Untroubled by apprehensions, I
stripped to the skin and began my practice. I was full of ambition;
I was determined to make a hit; I was burning to establish a
reputation as a bear and get further engagements; so I threw myself
into my work with an abandon that promised great things. I capered
back and forth from one end of the room to the other on all fours,
Sandy applauding with enthusiasm; I walked upright and growled and
snapped and snarled; I stood on my head, I flung handsprings, I
danced a lubberly dance with my paws bent and my imaginary snout
sniffing from side to side; I did everything a bear could do, and
many things which no bear could ever do and no bear with any
dignity would want to do, anyway; and of course I never suspected
that I was making a spectacle of myself to any one but Sandy. At
last, standing on my head, I paused in that attitude to take a
minute's rest. There was a moment's silence, then Sandy spoke up
with excited interest and said—
"Marse Sam, has you ever seen a
smoked herring?" "No. What is that?"
"It's a fish."
"Well, what of it? Anything
peculiar about it?"
"Yes, suh, you bet you dey is.
Dey eats 'em guts and all!"
There was a smothered burst of
feminine snickers from behind the screen! All the strength went out
of me and I toppled forward like an undermined tower and brought
the screen down with my weight, burying the young ladies under it.
In their fright they discharged a couple of piercing screams
—and possibly others, but I did
not wait to count. I snatched my clothes and fled to the dark hall
below, Sandy following. I was dressed in half a minute, and out the
back way. I swore Sandy to eternal silence, then we went away and
hid until the party was over. The ambition was all out of me. I
could not have faced that giddy company after my adventure, for
there would be two performers there who knew my secret, and would
be privately laughing at me all the time. I was searched for but
not found, and the bear had to be played by a young gentleman in
his civilized clothes. The house was still and everybody asleep
when I finally ventured home. I was very heavy-hearted, and full of
a sense of disgrace. Pinned to my
pillow I found a slip of paper
which bore a line that did not lighten my heart, but only made my
face burn. It was written in a laboriously disguised hand, and
these were its mocking terms:
"You probably couldn't have
played bear, but you played bare very well— oh, very very
well!"
We think boys are rude,
unsensitive animals, but it is not so in all cases. Each boy has
one or two sensitive spots, and if you can find out where they are
located you have only to touch them and you can scorch him as with
fire. I suffered miserably over that episode. I expected that the
facts would be all over the village in the morning, but it was not
so. The secret remained confined to the two girls and Sandy and me.
That was some appeasement of my pain, but it was far from
sufficient—the main trouble remained: I was under four mocking
eyes, and it might as well have been a thousand, for I suspected
all girls' eyes of being the ones I so dreaded. During several
weeks I could not look any young lady in the face; I dropped my
eyes in confusion when any one of them smiled upon me and gave me
greeting; and I said to myself, "That is one of them," and got
quickly away. Of course I was meeting the right girls everywhere,
but if they ever let slip any betraying sign I was not bright
enough to catch it. When I left Hannibal four years later, the
secret was still a secret; I had never guessed those girls out, and
was no longer expecting to do it. Nor wanting to, either.
One of the dearest and prettiest
girls in the village at the time of my mishap was one whom I will
call Mary Wilson, because that was not her name. She was twenty
years old; she was dainty and sweet, peach-bloomy and exquisite,
gracious and lovely in character, and I stood in awe of her, for
she seemed to me to be made out of angel-clay and rightfully
unapproachable by an unholy ordinary kind of a boy like me. I
probably never suspected her. But—
The scene changes. To
Calcutta—forty-seven years later. It was in 1896. I arrived there
on my lecturing trip. As I entered the hotel a divine vision passed
out of it, clothed in the glory of the Indian sunshine—the Mary
Wilson of my long-vanished boyhood! It was a startling thing.
Before I could recover from the bewildering shock and speak to her
she was gone. I
thought maybe I had seen an
apparition, but it was not so, she was flesh. She was the
granddaughter of the other Mary, the original Mary. That Mary, now
a widow, was up-stairs, and presently sent for me. She was old and
gray-haired, but she looked young and was very handsome. We sat
down and talked. We steeped our thirsty souls in the reviving wine
of the past, the beautiful past, the dear and lamented past; we
uttered the names that had been silent upon our lips for fifty
years, and it was as if they were made of music; with reverent
hands we unburied our dead, the mates of our youth, and caressed
them with our speech; we searched the dusty chambers of our
memories and dragged forth incident after incident, episode after
episode, folly after folly, and laughed such good laughs over them,
with the tears running down; and finally Mary said suddenly, and
without any leading up—
"Tell me! What is the special
peculiarity of smoked herrings?"
It seemed a strange question at
such a hallowed time as this. And so inconsequential, too. I was a
little shocked. And yet I was aware of a stir of some kind away
back in the deeps of my memory somewhere. It set me to
musing—thinking—searching. Smoked herrings. Smoked herrings. The
peculiarity of smo.... I glanced up. Her face was grave, but there
was a dim and shadowy twinkle in her eye which—All of a sudden I
knew! and far away down in the hoary past I heard a remembered
voice murmur, "Dey eats 'em guts and all!"
"At—last! I've found one of you,
anyway! Who was the other girl?" But she drew the line there. She
wouldn't tell me.
FOOTNOTE:
[4] That house still
stands.
IV.
... But it was on a bench in
Washington Square that I saw the most of Louis Stevenson. It was an
outing that lasted an hour or more, and was very pleasant and
sociable. I had come with him from his house, where I had been
paying my respects to his family. His business in the Square was to
absorb the sunshine. He was most scantily furnished with flesh, his
clothes seemed to fall into hollows as if there might be nothing
inside but the frame for a sculptor's statue. His long face and
lank hair and dark complexion and musing and melancholy expression
seemed to fit these details justly and harmoniously, and the
altogether of it seemed especially planned to gather the rays of
your observation and focalize them upon Stevenson's special
distinction and commanding feature, his splendid eyes. They burned
with a smouldering rich fire under the penthouse of his brows, and
they made him beautiful.
I said I thought he was right
about the others, but mistaken as to Bret Harte; in substance I
said that Harte was good company and a thin but pleasant talker;
that he was always bright, but never brilliant; that in this matter
he must not be classed with Thomas Bailey Aldrich, nor must any
other man, ancient or modern; that Aldrich was always witty, always
brilliant, if there was anybody present capable of striking his
flint at the right angle; that Aldrich was as sure and prompt and
unfailing as the red- hot iron on the blacksmith's anvil—you had
only to hit it competently to make it deliver an explosion of
sparks. I added—
"Aldrich has never had his peer
for prompt and pithy and witty and humorous sayings. None has
equalled him, certainly none has surpassed him, in the felicity of
phrasing with which he clothed these children of his fancy. Aldrich
was always brilliant, he couldn't help it, he is a fire-opal set
round with rose diamonds; when he is not speaking, you know that
his dainty fancies are twinkling and glimmering around in him; when
he speaks the diamonds flash. Yes, he was always brilliant, he will
always be brilliant; he will be brilliant in hell—you will
see."
Stevenson, smiling a chuckly
smile, "I hope not."
"Well, you will, and he will dim
even those ruddy fires and look like a transfigured Adonis backed
against a pink sunset."
There on that bench we struck out
a new phrase—one or the other of us, I don't remember
which—"submerged renown." Variations were discussed: "submerged
fame," "submerged reputation," and so on, and a choice was made;
"submerged renown" was elected, I believe. This important matter
rose out of an incident which had been happening to Stevenson in
Albany. While in a book-shop or book-stall there he had noticed a
long rank of small books, cheaply but neatly gotten up, and bearing
such titles as "Davis's Selected Speeches," "Davis's Selected
Poetry," Davis's this and Davis's that and Davis's the other thing;
compilations, every one of them, each with a brief, compact,
intelligent and useful introductory chapter by this same Davis,
whose first name I have forgotten. Stevenson had begun the matter
with this question:
"Can you name the American author
whose fame and acceptance stretch widest in the States?"
I thought I could, but it did not
seem to me that it would be modest to speak out, in the
circumstances. So I diffidently said nothing. Stevenson noticed,
and said—
"Save your delicacy for another
time—you are not the one. For a shilling you can't name the
American author of widest note and popularity in the
States. But I can."
Then he went on and told about
that Albany incident. He had inquired of the shopman—
"Who is this Davis?" The answer
was—
"An author whose books have to
have freight-trains to carry them, not baskets. Apparently you have
not heard of him?"
Stevenson said no, this was the
first time. The man said—
"Nobody has heard of Davis: you
may ask all around and you will see. You never see his name
mentioned in print, not even in advertisement; these things are of
no use to Davis, not any more than they are to the wind and the
sea. You never see one of Davis's books floating on top of the
United States, but put on your diving armor and get yourself
lowered away down and down and down till you strike the dense
region, the sunless region of eternal drudgery and starvation
wages—there you'll find them by the million. The man that gets that
market, his fortune is made, his bread and butter are safe, for
those people will never go back on him. An author may have a
reputation which is confined to the surface, and lose it and become
pitied, then despised, then forgotten, entirely forgotten—the
frequent steps in a surface reputation. At surface reputation,
however great, is always mortal, and always killable if you go at
it right—with pins and needles, and quiet slow poison, not with the
club and tomahawk. But it is a different matter with the submerged
reputation—down in the deep water; once a favorite there, always a
favorite; once beloved, always beloved; once respected, always
respected, honored, and believed in. For, what the reviewer says
never finds its way down into those placid deeps; nor the newspaper
sneers, nor any breath of the winds of slander blowing above. Down
there they never hear of these things. Their idol may be painted
clay, up then at the surface, and fade and waste and crumble and
blow away, there being much weather there; but down below he is
gold and adamant and indestructible."
V.
This is from this morning's
paper:
MARK TWAIN LETTER SOLD.
Written to Thomas Nast, it
Proposed a Joint Tour.
A Mark Twain autograph letter
brought $43 yesterday at the auction by the Merwin-Clayton Company
of the library and correspondence of the late Thomas Nast,
cartoonist. The letter is nine pages note- paper, is dated
Hartford, Nov. 12, 1877, and it addressed to Nast. It reads in part
as follows:
Hartford, Nov. 12.
MY DEAR NAST: I did not think I
should ever stand on a platform again until the time was come for
me to say I die innocent. But the same old offers keep arriving
that have arriven every year, and been every year declined—$500 for
Louisville, $500 for St. Louis, $1,000 gold for two nights in
Toronto, half gross proceeds for New York, Boston, Brooklyn,
&c. I have declined them all just as usual, though sorely
tempted as usual.
Now, I do not decline because I
mind talking to an audience, but because (1) travelling alone is so
heart-breakingly dreary, and (2) shouldering the whole show is such
cheer-killing responsibility.
Therefore I now propose to you
what you proposed to me in November, 1867—ten years ago, (when I
was unknown,) viz.; That you should stand on the platform and make
pictures, and I stand by you and blackguard the audience. I should
enormously enjoy meandering around (to big towns—don't want to go
to little ones) with you for company.
The letter includes a schedule of
cities and the number of appearances planned for each.
This is as it should be. This is
worthy of all praise. I say it myself lest other competent persons
should forget to do it. It appears that four of my ancient letters
were sold at auction, three of them at twenty-seven dollars,
twenty-eight dollars, and twenty-nine dollars respectively, and the
one above mentioned at forty-three dollars. There is one very
gratifying circumstance about this, to wit: that my literature has
more than held its own as regards money value through this stretch
of thirty-six years. I judge that the forty-three-dollar letter
must have gone at about ten cents a word, whereas if I had written
it to-day its market rate would be thirty cents—so I have increased
in value two or three hundred per cent. I note another gratifying
circumstance—that a letter of General Grant's sold at something
short of eighteen dollars. I can't rise to General Grant's lofty
place in the estimation of this nation, but it is a deep happiness
to me to know that when it comes to epistolary literature he can't
sit in the front seat along with me.
This reminds me—nine years ago,
when we were living in Tedworth Square, London, a report was cabled
to the American journals that I was dying. I was not the one. It
was another Clemens, a cousin of mine,—Dr. J. Ross Clemens, now of
St. Louis—who was due to die but presently escaped, by some
chicanery or other characteristic of the tribe of Clemens. The
London representatives of the American papers began to flock in,
with American cables in their hands, to inquire into my condition.
There was nothing the matter with me, and each in his turn was
astonished, and disappointed, to find me reading and smoking in my
study and worth next to nothing as a text for transatlantic news.
One of these men was a gentle and kindly and grave and sympathetic
Irishman, who hid his sorrow the best he could, and tried to look
glad, and told me that his paper, the Evening Sun, had cabled him
that it was reported in New York that I was dead. What should he
cable in reply? I said—
"Say the report is greatly
exaggerated."
He never smiled, but went
solemnly away and sent the cable in those words. The remark hit the
world pleasantly, and to this day it keeps turning up, now and
then, in the newspapers when people have occasion to discount
exaggerations.
The next man was also an
Irishman. He had his New York cablegram in his hand—from the New
York World—and he was so evidently trying to get around that cable
with invented softnesses and palliations that my curiosity was
aroused and I wanted to see what it did really say. So when
occasion offered I slipped it out of his hand. It said,
"If Mark Twain dying send five
hundred words. If dead send a thousand."
Now that old letter of mine sold
yesterday for forty-three dollars. When I am dead it will be worth
eighty-six.
MARK TWAIN.
(To be Continued.)
NORTH AMERICAN REVIEW
No. DC.
OCTOBER 5, 1906.
CHAPTERS FROM MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY.—
III.
BY MARK TWAIN.
VI.
To-morrow will be the
thirty-sixth anniversary of our marriage. My wife passed from this
life one year and eight months ago, in Florence, Italy, after an
unbroken illness of twenty-two months' duration.
I saw her first in the form of an
ivory miniature in her brother Charley's stateroom in the steamer
"Quaker City," in the Bay of Smyrna, in the summer of 1867, when
she was in her twenty-second year. I saw her in the flesh for the
first time in New York in the following December. She was slender
and beautiful and girlish—and she was both girl and woman. She
remained both girl and woman to the last day of her life. Under a
grave and gentle exterior burned inextinguishable fires of
sympathy, energy, devotion, enthusiasm, and absolutely limitless
affection. She was always frail in body, and she lived upon her
spirit, whose hopefulness and courage were indestructible. Perfect
truth, perfect honesty, perfect candor, were qualities of her
character which were born with her. Her judgments of people and
things were sure and accurate. Her intuitions almost never deceived
her. In her judgments of the characters and acts of both friends
and strangers, there was always room for charity, and this charity
never failed. I have compared and contrasted her with hundreds of
persons, and my conviction remains that hers was the most perfect
character I have ever met. And I may add that she was the most
winningly dignified person I have ever known. Her character and
disposition were of the sort that not only invites worship, but
commands it. No servant ever left her service who deserved to
remain in it. And, as she could choose with a glance of her eye,
the servants she selected did in almost all cases deserve to
remain, and they did remain. She was always cheerful; and she was
always able to communicate her cheerfulness to others. During the
nine years that we spent in poverty and debt, she was always able
to reason me out of my despairs, and find a bright side to the
clouds, and make me see it. In all that time, I never knew her to
utter a word of regret concerning our altered circumstances, nor
did I ever know her children to do the like. For she had taught
them, and they drew their fortitude from her. The love which
she
bestowed upon those whom she
loved took the form of worship, and in that form it was
returned—returned by relatives, friends and the servants of her
household. It was a strange combination which wrought into one
individual, so to speak, by marriage—her disposition and character
and mine. She poured out her prodigal affections in kisses and
caresses, and in a vocabulary of endearments whose profusion was
always an astonishment to me. I was born reserved as to endearments
of speech and caresses, and hers broke upon me as the summer waves
break upon Gibraltar. I was reared in that atmosphere of reserve.
As I have already said, in another chapter, I never knew a member
of my father's family to kiss another member of it except once, and
that at a death-bed. And our village was not a kissing community.
The kissing and caressing ended with courtship— along with the
deadly piano-playing of that day.
She had the heart-free laugh of a
girl. It came seldom, but when it broke upon the ear it was as
inspiring as music. I heard it for the last time when she had been
occupying her sickbed for more than a year, and I made a written
note of it at the time—a note not to be repeated.
To-morrow will be the
thirty-sixth anniversary. We were married in her father's house in
Elmira, New York, and went next day, by special train, to Buffalo,
along with the whole Langdon family, and with the Beechers and the
Twichells, who had solemnized the marriage. We were to live in
Buffalo, where I was to be one of the editors of the Buffalo
"Express," and a part owner of the paper. I knew nothing about
Buffalo, but I had made my household arrangements there through a
friend, by letter. I had instructed him to find a boarding-house of
as respectable a character as my light salary as editor would
command. We were received at about nine o'clock at the station in
Buffalo, and were put into several sleighs and driven all over
America, as it seemed to me—for, apparently, we turned all the
corners in the town and followed all the streets there were—I
scolding freely, and characterizing that friend of mine in very
uncomplimentary words for securing a boarding-house that apparently
had no definite locality. But there was a conspiracy—and my bride
knew of it, but I was in ignorance. Her father, Jervis Langdon, had
bought and furnished a new house for us in the fashionable street,
Delaware Avenue, and had laid in a cook and housemaids, and a brisk
and electric young coachman, an Irishman, Patrick McAleer—and we
were being driven all over that city in
order that one sleighful of those
people could have time to go to the house, and see that the gas was
lighted all over it, and a hot supper prepared for the crowd. We
arrived at last, and when I entered that fairy place my indignation
reached high-water mark, and without any reserve I delivered my
opinion to that friend of mine for being so stupid as to put us
into a boarding-house whose terms would be far out of my reach.
Then Mr. Langdon brought forward a very pretty box and opened it,
and took from it a deed of the house. So the comedy ended very
pleasantly, and we sat down to supper.
The company departed about
midnight, and left us alone in our new quarters. Then Ellen, the
cook, came in to get orders for the morning's marketing—and neither
of us knew whether beefsteak was sold by the barrel or by the yard.
We exposed our ignorance, and Ellen was fall of Irish delight over
it. Patrick McAleer, that brisk young Irishman, came in to get his
orders for next day—and that was our first glimpse of him....
Our first child, Langdon Clemens,
was born the 7th of November, 1870, and lived twenty-two months.
Susy was born the 19th of March, 1872, and passed from life in the
Hartford home, the 18th of August, 1896. With her, when the end
came, were Jean and Katy Leary, and John and Ellen (the gardener
and his wife). Clara and her mother and I arrived in England from
around the world on the 31st of July, and took a house in
Guildford. A week later, when Susy, Katy and Jean should have been
arriving from America, we got a letter instead.