Do Pharmaceutical Mergers Harm Drug Innovation? - Jan Schmidt - E-Book

Do Pharmaceutical Mergers Harm Drug Innovation? E-Book

Jan Schmidt

0,0
18,99 €

oder
-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.
Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

Master's Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Business economics - Miscellaneous, grade: 8,5 (NL, äquivalent zu 1,2), Utrecht University (Law, Economics and Governance), course: Mergers & Akquisitions, language: English, abstract: The number and volume of pharmaceutical companies’ mergers and acquisitions have reached exorbitant magnitudes in the last decade, with estimations of over 1,300 deals worth US$ 690 billion between 2000 and 2009.1 The biggest transaction, valued at US$ 66.7 billion2, occurred in 2009 when Pfizer bought Wyeth. The sheer dimension of transactions in this sector, being subject to significant public interest, poses questions about the motivations behind these deals, which are mostly believed to be countermeasures for patent expirations, as well as the impact on drug innovation. Even though, the regular object of interest regarding mergers is the shareholder value, in this specific case drug innovation is of particular interest as it does not only influence the future prospects of the pharmaceutical companies but also long term public health. Hence, the objective of this thesis is to discover what the impact of pharmaceutical mergers on R&D intensity and efficiency of the acquiring organization and on the pharmaceutical industry as a whole is.

Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:

EPUB
Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



Impressum:

Copyright (c) 2015 GRIN Verlag / Open Publishing GmbH, alle Inhalte urheberrechtlich geschützt. Kopieren und verbreiten nur mit Genehmigung des Verlags.

Bei GRIN macht sich Ihr Wissen bezahlt! Wir veröffentlichen kostenlos Ihre Haus-, Bachelor- und Masterarbeiten.

Jetzt beiwww.grin.com

Table of Contents

 

Tables and Figures

Introduction

1. Theoretical Framework and industry

1.1. Overview of M&A Theory and the pharmaceutical industry

1.2. Review of R&D and the drug approval process

2. Empirical Analyses

2.1. Empirical specification and data

2.1.1. Empirical specification

2.1.2. Data

2.2. Results - Mergers & Acquisitions and R&D intensity

2.3. Mergers & Acquisitions and R&D efficiency

3. Small Acquisitions and their Impact on Industry Efficiency

4. Discussion, Limitations and food for thought

Appendix

 

Tables and Figures

 

Figure 1: Average R&D cost per pharmaceutical drug in 2005 US$

Figure 2: Development of R&D and M&A expenditures

Figure 3: The pharmaceutical research and development process

Figure 4: Number of mergers over US$ 500 million in the dataset

 

Table 1: Anticipated effects of M&As on R&D

Table 2: Regional differences in the drug approval process and regulation

Table 3: Impact of M&A on R&D intensity

Table 4: Impact of M&A on R&D intensity incl. Country Dummies

Table 5: Impact of M&A on R&D efficiency, time periods

Table 6: Summary of key variables

Table 7: List of all mergers in the Dataset

Table 8: Thomson Dataset - Number of Companies per country

Table 9: Dataset 2 (Thomson) - Impact of M&A on R&D intensity 1980 to 2012, no control variables

Table 10: Dataset 2 (Thomson) - Impact of M&A on R&D 1980 to 2012 with control variables, Full table

Table 11: Dataset 2 (Thomson) - Impact of M&A on R&D 1980 to 2012 incl. Country Dummies, full table

Table 12: Impact of M&A on R&D efficiency, full table

Table 13: Impact of M&A on R&D efficiency, time periods full table

 

Introduction

 

The number and volume of pharmaceutical companies’ mergers and acquisitions have reached exorbitant magnitudes in the last decade, with estimations of over 1,300 deals worth US$ 690 billion between 2000 and 2009.[1] The biggest transaction, valued at US$ 66.7 billion[2], occurred in 2009 when Pfizer bought Wyeth. The sheer dimension of transactions in this sector, being subject to significant public interest, poses questions about the motivations behind these deals, which are mostly believed to be countermeasures for patent expirations, as well as the impact on drug innovation. Even though, the regular object of interest regarding mergers is the shareholder value, in this specific case drug innovation is of particular interest as it does not only influence the future prospects of the pharmaceutical companies but also long term public health. Hence, the objective of this thesis is to discover what the impact of pharmaceutical mergers on R&D intensity and efficiency of the acquiring organization and on the pharmaceutical industry as a whole is.

 

Accordingly, I present a short overview of general Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) theory, the pharmaceutical industry and the historic development of M&A within the industry. Subsequently, I briefly explain and discuss R&D practices, drug approval processes and differences in regulation between selected countries. Afterwards, I present and analyze R&D spending and intensity of major pharmaceutical companies and its correlation with M&A’s. Additionally, I connect R&D spending to patent applications, controlling for real innovations and remakes as far as possible, in order to examine the effects on R&D efficiency more closely. The empirical analysis is constrained to major firms mainly due to data availability problems. The subsequent qualitative section however, will discuss smaller acquisitions, the research efficiency of small and mediums sized companies as well as their impact on the industry’s development efficiency. Major pharmaceutical players frequently buy start-ups or small, innovative research companies to refresh their patent portfolio or acquire promising intellectual property. I elaborate whether these deals increase overall drug innovation efficiency, by allowing research by potentially more efficient small companies with the prospect of a sell off. Finally, I expose limitations of the paper, recommendations for future research and food for thought about policy implications and behavior of pharmaceutical companies. The presented topic is not only relevant for pure academic purposes but also for policy makers and institutions involved in the pharmaceutical sector. If a significant part of mergers affects drug innovation, steps should be undertaken to prevent the negative effects or avert these mergers at all. It is of public interest that drug innovation is as efficient as possible and this should be prioritized over profits from a regulator’s perspective. Thus and because of little existing research on this topic, it is pertinent for a master thesis and adds to the existing academic literature.

 

1. Theoretical Framework and industry

 

In this section, I will give an overview of motivations for and performance of M&A in general and in the pharmaceutical industry especially. I present the main findings of recent literature and determine the avenue of my research in this paper. Additionally, I explain the characteristics of Research and Development (R&D) in the pharmaceutical industry, including regulations and processes regarding drug approval and patenting.

 

1.1. Overview of M&A Theory and the pharmaceutical industry