142,99 €
FAT MIMETICS FOR FOOD APPLICATIONS Detailed resource providing insight into the understanding of fat mimetics and their use for the development of food products Fat Mimetics for Food Applications explores strategies for the development of fat mimetics for food applications, including meat, dairy, spreads and baked products, covering all the physical strategies and presenting the main characterization techniques for the study of fat mimetics behaviour. The text further provides insight into the understanding of fat mimetics in food structure and how it affects food products. Fat Mimetics for Food Applications is organized into five sections. The first section provides a historical overview and thermodynamic perspective of the structure-properties relationship in fat mimetics. Section II is devoted to the main materials used for the development of fat mimetics, and the structures that result from different methodologies and approaches. Section III overviews the methodologies used for the characterization of the developed replacers. Section IV contains examples of what has been done in the use of fat mimetics in food. Section V focuses on a future perspective, along with real cases of projects within the industry and a commercial perspective of some examples. Topics covered in Fat Mimetics for Food Applications include: * Role of lipids in foods and human nutrition; the current status of fats in the food industry; and food trends as they pertain to fat mimetics * Materials for the production of fat mimetics such as natural waxes, sterols, lecithin, mono and di-glycerides, fatty alcohols and fatty acids, polysaccharides and proteins * Rheological and texture properties; sensorial aspects of fat mimetics and advanced characterization strategies such as small-angle X-ray scattering and small-angle neutron scattering * Fat mimetics' nutritional and functional properties, along with examples of using in vitro gastrointestinal digestion system to unravel the lipids fat during digestion * Examples of the application of fat mimetics in different food products such as meat, dairy, margarine and fat spreads and baked products Fat Mimetics for Food Applications targets researchers, academics, and food industry professionals to boost their capability to integrate different science and technology as well as engineering and materials aspects of fat mimetics for food development.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1240
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Edited by
Miguel Ângelo Parente Ribeiro Cerqueira
International Iberian Nanotechnology LaboratoryBraga, Portugal
Lorenzo Miguel Pastrana Castro
International Iberian Nanotechnology LaboratoryBraga, Portugal
This edition first published 2023
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Miguel Ângelo Parente Ribeiro Cerqueira and Lorenzo Miguel Pastrana Castro to be identified as the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Offices
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Trademarks: Wiley and the Wiley logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries and may not be used without written permission. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty
While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress
Hardback ISBN: 9781119780014; ePub ISBN: 9781119780038; ePDF ISBN: 9781119780021; oBook ISBN: 9781119780045
Cover image: © ThomasVogel/Getty Images
Cover design by Wiley
Set in 9.5/12.5pt STIXTwoText by Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Pondicherry, India
To our families for their love and support.
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Foreword
List of Contributors
Preface
Acknowledgements
Editors
Section I Introduction to Fat Mimetics
1.1 Why Does the Food Industry Need Fat Mimetics?
1.1.1 The Role of Lipids in Foods and Human Nutrition
1.1.2 Current Status of Fats in the Food Industry
1.1.3 Food Trends and Fat Mimetics
1.2 Overview of the Structure-Property Relationship in Fat Mimetics
1.2.1 Introduction
1.2.2 Rheological Properties
1.2.3 Large Deformation Testing
1.2.4 Microstructure
1.2.5 Oil Binding Capacity
1.2.6 Conclusions and Next Steps
Section II Materials and Methods Used for the Production of Fat Mimetics
2.1 Natural Wax-Based Oleogels for Food Application
2.1.1 Introduction
2.1.2 Mechanism of Oleogelation
2.1.3 Bibliography Meta-Analysis
2.1.4 Natural Waxes
2.1.4.1 Candelilla Wax
2.1.4.1.1 Chemical Composition of CW
2.1.4.1.2 Physico-Chemical Properties of CW
2.1.4.2 Rice Bran Wax
2.1.4.2.1 Chemical Composition of RBW
2.1.4.2.2 Physico-Chemical Properties of RBW
2.1.4.3 Beeswax
2.1.4.3.1 Chemical Composition of BW
2.1.4.3.2 Physico-Chemical Properties of BW
2.1.5 Applications of the Natural Wax-Based Oleogels
2.1.5.1 Candelilla Wax
2.1.5.2 Rice Bran Wax
2.1.5.3 Beeswax
2.1.6 Conclusion
2.2 Phytosterols and Other Sterols
2.2.1 Introduction
2.2.2
γ
-Oryzanol-Sterols System
2.2.2.1 Crystallites and Oil Gelation
2.2.2.2
γ
-Oryzanol-Sterols Mechanism
2.2.2.3 Hydrates
2.2.3 Other Combinations Including Sterols
2.2.4 Perspective on the Industrial Applicability
2.2.5 Conclusion
2.3 Lecithin
2.3.1 Introduction
2.3.2 Lecithin Chemistry
2.3.2.1 Types and Composition
2.3.2.2 Technological Manufacture of Lecithin
2.3.2.3 Strategies of Lecithin Modification
2.3.2.3.1 Physical Modification
2.3.2.3.2 Enzymatic Modification
2.3.2.3.3 Chemical Modification
2.3.2.4 Lecithin Self-Assembly: Dependence of Solvent Medium
2.3.3 Exploring Techno-Functionalities of Lecithin
2.3.3.1 Conventional Fat: The Role of Lecithin as Crystallization Modifier in Lipid Systems
2.3.4 Application of Lecithin in Alternative Oil-Structuring Routes
2.3.4.1 Oleogels
2.3.4.2 Emulsion Strategies
2.3.5 Beyond Oil-Structuring Purposes: Role of Lecithin as an Emulsifier and in the Vehiculation of Bioactive Components
2.3.6 Food Applications
2.3.6.1 Margarines
2.3.6.2 Bakery Products
2.3.6.3 Chocolate
2.3.6.4 Dairy Products
2.3.7 Final Remarks and Perspectives
2.4 Mono‐ and Diglycerides
2.4.1 Introduction
2.4.2 Monoglycerides and Diglycerides
2.4.3 Fat Mimetics Based on Mono- and Diglycerides
2.4.3.1 Hydrogels
2.4.3.1.1 Effect of Compositional Factors
2.4.3.1.2 Effect of Processing Factors
2.4.3.2 Oleogels
2.4.3.2.1 Effect of Compositional Factors
2.4.3.2.2 Effect of Processing Factors
2.4.3.3 From Oleogels to Oleofoams
2.4.3.3.1 Effect of Compositional Factors
2.4.3.3.2 Effect of Processing Factors
2.4.3.4 Gelled Emulsions
2.4.3.4.1 Oil-in-Water Gelled Emulsions
2.4.3.4.2 Effect of Compositional Factors
2.4.3.4.3 Effect of Processing Factors
2.4.3.5 From O/W Gelled Emulsions to High Internal Phase Emulsions (HIPE)
2.4.3.6 Water-in-oil Gelled Emulsions
2.4.3.7 From W/O Gelled Emulsions to High Internal Phase Emulsions (HIPE)
2.4.4 Food Applications
2.4.5 Novel Functionalities of MG and DG Fat Mimetics
2.4.6 Conclusions
2.5 Oleogels Based on Fatty Acids and Fatty Alcohols: Toward Oil Foams
2.5.1 Introduction
2.5.2 Structure and Properties of Oleogel Based on Fatty Acids or Fatty Alcohols
2.5.2.1 Definition and Properties of Fatty Alcohol
2.5.2.2 Definition and Properties of Fatty Acids
2.5.2.3 Fatty Alcohols as Oleogelators
2.5.2.4 Fatty Acids as Oleogelators
2.5.3 Mixture of Fatty Acids and Fatty Alcohol to Improve Oleogel Properties
2.5.3.1 Effect of R on the Crystal Structure
2.5.3.2 Effect of R on the Microstructure of the Oleogels
2.5.3.3 Effect of R on the Thermal Behavior and Solid Fat Content of Oleogels
2.5.3.4 Effect of R on Oleogel Properties: Mechanical Strength and Stability
2.5.4 Oil Foams Based on Fatty Acids and Fatty Alcohols
2.5.4.1 Definition of Oil Foams Stabilized by Crystalline Particles
2.5.4.2 Oil Foams Based on Fatty Acids and Fatty Alcohols
2.5.4.3 Controlling Oil Foam Properties by Tuning the Ratio between Fatty Alcohol and Fatty Acids
2.5.4.4 Application of Oil Foams to Develop Food Products
2.5.5 Conclusion and Perspectives
2.6 Proteins as Fat Replacers in the Food Industry
2.6.1 Introduction
2.6.2 Fat Mimetics
2.6.3 Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
2.6.3.1 Animal Protein-Based Fat Replacers
2.6.3.1.1 Casein
2.6.3.1.2 Whey Protein
2.6.3.1.3 Microparticulated Whey Protein
2.6.3.1.4 Simplesse & Dairy-Lo
2.6.3.1.5 Egg White Protein
2.6.3.1.6 Plasma Protein
2.6.3.1.7 Collagen Protein
2.6.3.1.8 Gelatin Protein
2.6.3.2 Plant Protein-Based Fat Replacers
2.6.3.2.1 Soy Protein
2.6.3.2.2 Corn Zein Protein
2.6.3.2.3 Wheat Gluten Protein
2.6.3.2.4 Pea Protein
2.6.3.2.5 Lupin Protein
2.6.4 Properties of Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
2.6.5 Factors Affecting the Acceptability of Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
2.6.5.1 Sensory Attributes
2.6.5.2 Nutritional Properties
2.6.5.3 Hygienic Aspects
2.6.5.4 Cost
2.6.5.5 Health Aspects
2.6.5.6 Marketing
2.6.5.7 Convenience
2.6.5.8 Heat Stability
2.6.6 Applications of Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
2.6.6.1 Bakery Products
2.6.6.2 Chocolate and Confectionery Products
2.6.6.3 Dairy Products
2.6.6.4 Meat Products
2.6.6.5 Other Applications
2.6.7 Future of Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
2.7 Polysaccharide-Based Oleogels
2.7.1 Introduction
2.7.2 Direct Polymeric Structuring
2.7.2.1 Ethylcellulose
2.7.2.2 EC-Based Hybrid Oleogelation Systems
2.7.2.2.1 Monoacylglycerol
2.7.2.2.2 Stearyl Alcohol and Stearic Acid
2.7.2.2.3 Lauric Acid
2.7.2.2.4 Behenic Acid
2.7.2.2.5 Lecithin
2.7.2.2.6 EC/MAG Binary and Ternary Blends (Edible Shortenings)
2.7.2.3 EC-Based Oleogels in Food Applications and Nutrient Delivery
2.7.2.4 Chitin
2.7.3 Indirect Structuring
2.7.3.1 Emulsion-Templating
2.7.3.2 Aerogel-Templating
2.7.3.2.1 Foam-Templating
2.7.3.2.2 Supercritical CO
2
-Derived Templates
2.7.4 Conclusion
Section III Methodologies for the Characterisation of Fat Mimetics
3.1 Rheology and Texture Analysis
3.1.1 Introduction
3.1.2 Rheology Principles
3.1.2.1 Large Deformation Tests
3.1.2.1.1 Rheological Behavior/Viscosity Measurements
3.1.2.1.2 Time-Dependence
3.1.2.2 Small Deformation Tests
3.1.2.2.1 Transient Tests
3.1.2.2.2 Oscillatory Tests
3.1.3 Texture Principles
3.1.3.1 Fundamental Tests
3.1.3.1.1 Uniaxial Compression
3.1.3.2 Empiric Tests
3.1.3.2.1 Puncture
3.1.3.2.2 Spreadability
3.2 Application of Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering to Fat Mimetics
3.2.1 Introduction
3.2.2 Fundamentals of Small-Angle Scattering
3.2.2.1 SAS Instrumentation
3.2.2.2 SAS Experiment and Data Collection
3.2.2.3 Data Analysis and Interpretation
3.2.3 Recent Experimental SAS and USAS Examples to Oleogels
3.2.3.1 Oleic Acid–Sodium Oleate
3.2.3.2 Natural Waxes
3.2.3.3 β-sitosterol (and Other Phytosterols) with γ-oryzanol
3.2.3.4 Lecithin
3.2.3.5 Mono‐, Di- and Triglycerides
3.2.3.6 Carbohydrate and Proteins
3.2.4 Conclusions and Outlook
3.3 Sensory Evaluation of Fat Reduction in Foods
3.3.1 Introduction
3.3.2 Generalities on Fat Replacement and Sensory Evaluation
3.3.3 Effect of Fat Replacement in Food Products
3.3.3.1 Cereal and Baking Products
3.3.3.2 Meat Products
3.3.3.3 Dairy Products
3.3.4 Conclusion and Final Considerations
3.4 Gastrointestinal Fate of Lipid-Based Formulations as Fat Mimetics
3.4.1 Introduction
3.4.2 Lipid Digestion
3.4.2.1 In Vitro Models
3.4.2.2 Factors Affecting Lipid Digestion
3.4.3 Conclusion
3.5 Nutritional and Functional Properties of Fat Mimetics
3.5.1 Introduction
3.5.2 Emerging Fat Mimetics
3.5.2.1 Oleogels
3.5.2.2 Templated Oleogels
3.5.2.3 Emulsion Gels
3.5.2.4 Structured Emulsions
3.5.3 Multifunctionality of Fat Mimetics in Food Applications
3.5.3.1 Replacement of Saturated Fats
3.5.3.2 Reducing Energy Intake in Diets
3.5.3.3 In Vitro and In Vivo Digestion
3.5.3.4 Controlled Delivery Carriers and Release of Bioactive Molecules
3.4.3.5 Texture Design and Modification
3.5.3.5 Reduction in Lipid Oxidation
3.5.4 Conclusion and Outlook
Section IV Food Applications
4.1 Processed Meat Products
4.1.1 Introduction
4.1.2 Definition and Classification
4.1.3 Type of Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.1 Carbohydrate-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.1.1 Starch and Starch Derivatives-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.1.2 Cellulose-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.1.3 Dietary Fiber-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.1.4 Gelling and Bulking Agent-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.1.5 Gum-based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.2 Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.3.3 Fat-Based Fat Mimetics
4.1.4 Conclusion
4.2 Fat Mimetics in Dairy Products
4.2.1 Introduction
4.2.2 The Characteristics of Milk Fat
4.2.3 The Role of Milk Fat in Dairy Products
4.2.3.1 Milk Fat and Dairy Product’s Sensory Characteristics
4.2.3.2 Milk Fat and Dairy Products Texture
4.2.3.3 Milk Fat and Dairy Products Melting Properties
4.2.4 Issues with Low-Fat Dairy Products
4.2.5 Fat Mimetics in Dairy Products
4.2.5.1 Carbohydrate-Based Fat Mimetics
4.2.5.2 Protein-Based Fat Mimetics
4.2.5.3 Lipid-Based Fat Mimetics
4.2.5.3.1 Oleogels as a Possible Fat Mimetics
4.2.6 Applications of Fat Mimetics in Different Dairy Products
4.2.6.1 Cheese
4.2.6.2 Ice Cream
4.2.6.3 Yogurt
4.2.6.4 Dairy Dessert and Beverages
4.2.7 Conclusion
4.3 Margarine and Fat Spreads
4.3.1 Introduction
4.3.1.1 Definitions and Legislation
4.3.1.2 Microstructure
4.3.1.3 Formulation
4.3.1.4 Processing
4.3.1.5 Properties
4.3.2 Alternative Structuring Approaches for Margarines and Fat Spreads
4.3.2.1 Stabilization Mechanisms
4.3.2.2 Network Stabilization – Continuous Phase
4.3.2.2.1 Waxes
4.3.2.2.2 Mono- and Diglycerides
4.3.2.2.3 Ethylcellulose
4.3.2.2.4 Phytosterols
4.3.2.2.5 Lecithin
4.3.2.3 Network Stabilization–Dispersed Phase
4.3.2.4 Bigels
4.3.3 Conclusion
4.4 Baked Products
4.4.1 Introduction
4.4.2 Fat Mimetics in Bakery Products
4.4.2.1 Fat Mimetics in Bread Formulation
4.4.2.2 Fat Mimetics in Cookie/Biscuit Formulation
4.4.2.3 Fat Mimetics in Cake/Muffin Formulation
4.4.3 Conclusion
Section V Industrial Perspective
5. 1 Molecular Gels–Barriers, Advances, and Opportunities
5.1.1 Introduction
5.1.2 Reliance Serendipitous Discovery
5.1.3 Solvent Confluence on Gelation Outcome
5.1.3.1 Dissecting Gelator and Solvent Molecular Features that Drive Self-Assembly–A Step Toward Rational Design
5.1.3.2 Solvent Complexity of Edible Oils–An Opportunity for Advancement
5.1.4 Emerging Low Molecular Mass Organogelating Technologies
5.1.4.1 Peptide Gelators
5.1.4.2 Sugar Gelators
5.1.4.3 Lipids Gelators
5.1.4.4 Mixed System Gelators
5.1.5 Polymeric Gelation
5.1.5.1 Emerging Polymeric Organogelating Technologies
5.1.6 Conclusion
5.2 Research and Development Toward the Commercialization of Fat Mimetics
5.2.1 Introduction
5.2.2 Research & Development in Fat Mimetics
5.2.3 Patents and Commercial Products
5.2.4 Conclusion
Index
End User License Agreement
CHAPTER 03
Table 2.1.2 Physical properties...
Table 2.1.1 Chemical composition...
Table 2.1.4 Rice bran wax...
Table 2.1.5 Beeswax – based...
CHAPTER 04
Table 2.2.1 Gelator combinations...
CHAPTER 05
Table 2.3.1 Phospholipids and...
Table 2.3.2 Strategies using...
Table 2.3.3 Lecithins applied...
CHAPTER 06
Table 2.4.1 Compositional and...
Table 2.4.2 Factors affecting...
Table 2.4.3 Applications of...
CHAPTER 07
Table 2.5.1 Example of saturated...
Table 2.5.2 Fatty alcohols...
CHAPTER 08
Table 2.6.2 xamples of fat...
Table 2.6.1 Attributes associated...
Table 2.6.3 Commercial plant...
CHAPTER 09
Table 2.7.1 Summary of studies...
Table 2.7.2 Impact of various...
CHAPTER 11
Table 3.2.1 Chemical formulae...
CHAPTER 12
Table 3.3.1 Main sensory...
CHAPTER 13
Table 3.4.1 Summary of studies...
CHAPTER 14
Table 3.5.1 Examples of applications...
CHAPTER 15
Table 4.1.1 Application of...
CHAPTER 16
Table 4.2.1 Summary of studies...
Table 4.2.2 Summary of studies...
Table 4.2.3 Summary of studies...
Table 4.2.4 Summary of studies...
CHAPTER 17
Table 4.3.1 Water-in-oil...
Table 4.3.2 Overview of...
CHAPTER 18
Table 4.4.1 Overview of...
Table 4.4.2 An overview of...
CHAPTER 19
Table 5.1.1 Outcomes from...
Table 5.1.2 HSP (δd, δp,...
Table 5.1.3 HSPs (δd, δp,...
CHAPTER 20
Table 5.2.1 Funded projects...
Table 5.2.2 Patents on fat...
CHAPTER 02
Figure 1.2.1 Schematic diagram...
Figure 1.2.2 Polarized light...
Figure 1.2.3 Illustration of...
CHAPTER 03
Figure 2.1.1 Schematics of oleogel...
Figure 2.1.2 Network Visualization...
CHAPTER 04
Figure 2.2.1 Steroid skeleton...
Figure 2.2.2 Polarized light...
Figure 2.2.3 A) SAXS and WAXS...
Figure 2.2.4 Effect of sterol...
Figure 2.2.5 Summary of the...
Figure 2.2.6 A) AFM of 20% w/w...
Figure 2.2.7 Raman modes that...
Figure 2.2.8 A) Top: Stacking...
CHAPTER 05
Figure 2.3.1 Chemical structure...
Figure 2.3.2 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.3.3 Schematic illustration...
Figure 2.3.4 Possible effects...
CHAPTER 06
Figure 2.4.1 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.4.2 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.4.3 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.4.4 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.4.5 Schematic representation...
CHAPTER 07
Figure 2.5.1 Differential...
Figure 2.5.2 SAXS (a) and...
Figure 2.5.3 Schematic phase...
Figure 2.5.4 Illustration of...
Figure 2.5.5 Illustration of...
CHAPTER 08
Figure 2.6.1 Classification...
Figure 2.6.2 Major sources...
CHAPTER 09
Figure 2.7.1 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.7.2 Normalized gel strength...
Figure 2.7.3 Microstructure (A,B) and...
Figure 2.7.4 Schematic representation...
Figure 2.7.5 Structural and rheological...
Figure 2.7.6 SEM micrographs and...
CHAPTER 10
Figure 3.1.1 Flow curves of the...
Figure 3.1.2 Thixotropic behavior...
Figure 3.1.3 (A) Stress relaxation...
Figure 3.1.4 Oscillatory rheology...
Figure 3.1.5 Stress vs strain curves...
Figure 3.1.6 Force–time plots...
Figure 3.1.7 Characteristic curve...
CHAPTER 11
Figure 3.2.1 Small-angle scattering...
Figure 3.2.2 (a) Scattering geometry...
Figure 3.2.3 SAS from spherical particles...
Figure 3.2.4 SAS from a Guinier-Porod model...
Figure 3.2.5 SAS from a 30% volume...
Figure 3.2.6 SANS from 1:1 and 0:1...
Figure 3.2.7 SANS intensity in the...
Figure 3.2.8 (a) Combined USANS...
Figure 3.2.9 SAXS from typical...
CHAPTER 12
Figure 3.3.1 Sensory analysis...
Figure 3.3.2 Example of TCATA...
Figure 3.3.3 Example of CATA...
CHAPTER 13
Figure 3.4.1 General schematic...
Figure 3.4.2 Free fatty acids...
Figure 3.4.3 The effect of different...
CHAPTER 14
Figure 3.5.1 The hierarchy of fat...
Figure 3.5.2 An overview diagram...
Figure 3.5.3 (A) Appearance of the...
Figure 3.5.4 (A) Visual aspect of...
Figure 3.5.5 Structuring of liquid...
Figure 3.5.6 (A) Schematic for the...
Figure 3.5.7 (A) Structure and schematic...
Figure 3.5.8 Schematic representation...
Figure 3.5.9 (A) Schematic representation...
Figure 3.5.10 (A) Schematic illustration...
Figure 3.5.11 (A and B) The preparation...
Figure 3.5.12 Nutritional and functional...
CHAPTER 15
Figure 4.1.1 Application of fat...
Figure 4.1.2 An ideal fat mimetic/replacer...
Figure 4.1.3 Schematic presentation...
CHAPTER 16
Figure 4.2.1 The composition...
Figure 4.2.2 Prepared carnauba...
CHAPTER 17
Figure 4.3.1 Cryo-SEM images...
Figure 4.3.2 Microstructure...
Figure 4.3.3 Microstructure...
Figure 4.3.4 Schematic drawing...
Figure 4.3.5 Schematic overview...
Figure 4.3.6 Solid fat content...
Figure 4.3.7 Schematic overview...
Figure 4.3.8 Polarized light...
Figure 4.3.9 Examples of dispersed...
CHAPTER 18
Figure 4.4.1 SEM images of cookies...
Figure 4.4.2 Micro-CT tomographical...
CHAPTER 19
Figure 5.1.1 Hansen Solubility...
Figure 5.1.2 (A) Gelation spheres...
Figure 5.1.3 HSP’s frequency...
Figure 5.1.4 Ternary phase diagram...
Figure 5.1.5 Polarized light microscopy...
Cover
Title page
Copyright
Dedication
Table of Contents
Foreword
List of Contributors
Preface
Acknowledgements
Editors
Begin Reading
Index
Plates
End User License Agreement
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii
xiv
xv
xvi
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
We underestimated the global demand for (solid) fats with both food and non-food applications, which resulted in the current supply shortage. Food demands remain unsatisfied because the volume of (solid) fats is insufficient to meet the demands of sustainability, health, and cost.
In the 1950s, we thought that butter could be a long-term fat solution, but its global consumption has slightly decreased given consumers’ concerns about saturated fats and cholesterol in their diet. To address these concerns, food processors replaced butter with margarine in the 1960s. Margarines were initially processed with partially hydrogenation vegetable oils. Unfortunately, the partial hydrogenation process produces unhealthy artificial trans fats. After the 1990s, partial hydrogenation was replaced by an interesterification of a solid fat (mainly from palm oil) with a liquid vegetable oil (rapeseed, soybean or sunflower) to produce trans-free margarines.
Palm oil emerged as the leading global source of (solid) fat. Palm kernel oil or palm stearin, has low production costs and is used by leading palm oil producers. Palm oils are driven by the high oil yields per hectare for oil palm relative to other vegetable oil crops. Well-managed oil palm estates should achieve four to six tons of crude palm oil per hectare; this is nearly five times the amount of oil obtained from a hectare planted with sunflowers.
Sustainability is one potential check on the use of palm oil is sustainability, which has recently come to the forefront. Earlier this century, palm oil earned a negative environmental reputation. As a result, a sustainable palm supply chain was founded in 2004, and many Western EU countries have pledged to source only 100% sustainable palm oil by 2020. France, Italy, and Belgium, and more recently, Spain, Germany and the UK have begun to see palm oil as unhealthy. Health concern is pushing sustainable palm into the background. The debate centers on saturated fat intake, and recently, on 3-MCPD (3-monochloropropane diol) risks associated with palm oil. The food demand for palm oil in Europe has dropped from 3.1 million tonnes in 2013 to 2.2 million tonnes in 2019. So, “exotic fats” are becoming credible alternatives to palm fats.
“Exotic fats” are typically fats such as shea, sal, illipé, kokum, and mango kernel. One of the major drawbacks of “exotic fats” is the high price and poor availability of raw materials. As an illustration, shea is rarely grown on plantations; the nuts are mainly collected in the savannah by local people and are sold in small volumes to processing plants. This makes the supply potentially susceptible to political unrest or to other unexpected events. Moreover, the cost of shea butter was over $3,500 per tonne, while palm (kernel) fat was below $1,000 per tonne during the same period (2019–2021).
Can fat mimetics be the solution? This book answers that question. In any case, to serve as a solution, fat mimetics would need to be efficient, scalable, and cost effective. These are fundamental concerns that scientists should always keep in mind.
Fabrice TURON,PhD
Head of Research
FAT & Associés, France
Ainaz AlizadehDepartment of Food Science and TechnologyTabriz BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTabriz, Iran
Maria A. AzevedoCentre of Biological EngineeringUniversity of MinhoCampus de GualtarBraga, Portugal
Akhoon Asrar BashirICAR-Central Institute of Post-HarvestEngineering and Technology (CIPHET)Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Deepti BhartiDepartment of Biotechnology and MedicalEngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkela, Odisha, India
Filip Van BockstaeleDepartment of Food TechnologySafety and HealthFood Structure and Function (FS&F) ResearchGroupGhent UniversityCoupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
Mariel Calderón-OliverTecnológico de MonterreyEscuela de Ingeniería y CienciasMexico
Sonia CalligarisDepartment of Agricultural, Food,Environmental, and Animal SciencesUniversity of UdineUdine, Italy
Miguel Ângelo CerqueiraINL – International Iberian NanotechnologyLaboratoryBraga, Portugal
Xiao-Wei ChenLipid Technology and EngineeringCollege of Food Science and EngineeringHenan University of TechnologyZhengzhou, People’s Republic of China
Poonam ChoudharyICAR-Central Institute of Post-HarvestEngineering and Technology (CIPHET)Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Gabrielli Nunes ClímacoDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas – UNICAMPCampinas, SP, Brazil
Rosiane Lopes da CunhaDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)Campinas, SP, Brazil
Ilkem DemirkesenDepartment of Animal Health, Food and FeedResearch, General Directorate of AgriculturalResearch and PoliciesMinistry of Agriculture and ForestryAnkara, Turkey
Koen DewettinckDepartment of Food TechnologySafety and HealthFood Structure and Function (FS&F) ResearchGroupGhent UniversityCoupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
Hector Escalona-BuendíaDepartamento de BiotecnologíaUAM-IztapalapaMexico
Anne-Laure FameauUnité Matériaux et Transformations (UMET) –UMR 8207, INRAETeam PIHMVilleneuve d’Ascq, France
Luiz Henrique FasolinDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas – UNICAMPCampinas, SP, Brazil
Elliot Paul GilbertAustralian Centre for Neutron ScatteringAustralian Nuclear Science and TechnologyOrganisationLucas Heights, NSW, Australia
Australian Institute for Bioengineering andNanotechnology and Centre for Nutrition andFood SciencesThe University of QueenslandSt. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Catarina GonçalvesInternational Iberian NanotechnologyLaboratoryBraga, Portugal
Dharani GopiNational Institute of Food TechnologyEntrepreneurship and ManagementThanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Andrew J. GravelleDepartment of Food Science and TechnologyUniversity of California, DavisDavis, CA, USA
Buse N. GürbüzINL – International Iberian NanotechnologyLaboratoryBraga, Portugal
Doman KimGraduate School of International AgriculturalTechnologySeoul National UniversityPyeongchang-gunGangwon-do, South Korea
Institute of Food IndustrializationInstitutes of Green Bioscience and TechnologySeoul National UniversityPyeongchang-gunGangwon-do, South Korea
Yogesh KumarICAR-Central Institute of Post-HarvestEngineering and Technology (CIPHET)Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Suyong LeeDepartment of Food Science & Biotechnologyand Carbohydrate Bioproduct Research CenterSejong UniversitySeoul, Republic of Korea
Felipe de Andrade MaiaDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food Engineering University ofCampinas – UNICAMP CampinasSP, Brazil
Lara ManzoccoDepartment of Agricultural, Food,Environmental, and Animal SciencesUniversity of UdineUdine, Italy
Alejandro G. MarangoniUniversity of GuelphGuelph, ON, Canada
Artur J. MartinsInternational Iberian NanotechnologyLaboratoryBraga, Portugal
Sofia MelchiorDepartment of Agricultural, Food,Environmental, and Animal SciencesUniversity of UdineUdine, Italy
Behiç MertDepartment of Food EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkara, Turkey
Karunairaj MichaelNational Institute of Food TechnologyEntrepreneurship and ManagementThanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Reed A. NicholsonMotif FoodWorks, Inc.Boston, MA, USA
Paula Kiyomi OkuroDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)Campinas, SP, Brazil
Kunal PalDepartment of Biotechnology and MedicalEngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkela, Odisha, India
Lorenzo Miguel Pastrana CastroINL – International Iberian NanotechnologyLaboratoryBraga, Portugal
Ivana A. PenagosDepartment of Food TechnologySafety and HealthFood Structure and Function (FS&F) ResearchGroupGhent UniversityCoupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
Carolina Siqueira Franco PiconeDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas – UNICAMPCampinas, SP, Brazil
Aurora Pintor-JardinesDepartamento de BiotecnologíaUAM-IztapalapaMexico
Stella PlazzottaDepartment of Agricultural, Food,Environmental, and Animal SciencesUniversity of UdineUdine, Italy
Bikash K. PradhanDepartment of Biotechnology and MedicalEngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkela, Odisha, India
Ashish RawsonNational Institute of Food TechnologyEntrepreneurship and ManagementThanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Ana Paula Badan RibeiroDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)Campinas, SP, Brazil
Michael A. RogersAssociate Professor and Tier II CanadaResearch Chair in Food NanotechnologyUniversity of GuelphGuelph, Ontario, Canada
Kato RondouDepartment of Food TechnologySafety and HealthFood Structure and Function (FS&F) ResearchGroupGhent UniversityCoupure Links, Ghent, Belgium
Satish SaigiriAgro-Nanotechnology and Advanced MaterialsResearch CenterInstitute of Postharvest and Food SciencesAgricultural Research OrganizationThe Volcani CenterRishon LeZion, Israel
Patricia Severiano-PérezDepartamento de Alimentos y BiotecnologíaFacultad de Química, UNAMMexico
Thaís Jordânia SilvaDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)Campinas, SP, Brazil
Mayanny Gomes da SilvaDepartment of Food Engineering andTechnologySchool of Food EngineeringUniversity of Campinas (UNICAMP)Campinas, SP, Brazil
Mitra SoofiDepartment of Food Science and TechnologyTabriz branchIslamic Azad UniversityTabriz, Iran
Davanam SrikanthNational Institute of Food TechnologyEntrepreneurship and ManagementThanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Sunil C. K.National Institute of Food TechnologyEntrepreneurship and ManagementThanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Xiao-Quan YangLaboratory of Food Proteins and ColloidsDepartment of Food Science and EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhou, People’s Republic of China
The scientific community and the food industry are constantly challenged to meet consumer demands for new food products nutritionally balanced and healthy while maintaining the product’s safety, good organoleptic properties, and convenience. One pivotal way to meet those challenges is in replacing fats in processed foods. Fats are known for their health implications and influence on foods’ shelf-life and nutritional properties. Replacing fats by reducing the amount of fats or by replacing unhealthy fats with healthy fats has been a challenge in the last 20 years. These challenges are mainly related to the physicochemical properties of fats and their influence on food structure and with organoleptic properties.
This book provides an overview of the strategies used for developing fat mimetics for food applications. It will cover all the physical strategies and present the main characterization techniques for studying fat mimetics behaviour. It will grant insight into how fat mimetics in food structure are understood and how fat mimetics affect the all characteristics of food products.
The book is organized into five sections. The first section is the foundation for subsequent sections and covers the demanding for fat mimetics for food applications and the relationship of the structural properties in fat mimetics. Section II is devoted to the primarily materials used in fat mimetics development and to the structures that result from different methodologies and approaches. Section III will cover the methodologies used to characterize the developed replacers not only from a physical and sensorial perspective, but also in terms of how fat replacers behave in the gastrointestinal tract. The examples of the food products will be discussed in section IV, where what has been done in terms of using fat mimetics in food products will be presented; this section aims to cover all possible use of these materials. Section V focuses on the industrial perspective. and will present a future perspective using some real cases for projects within the food industry and some commercial examples.
The information in this book is expected to increase the scientific understanding of fat mimetics. The authors are scientists with different areas of expertise covering principal aspects of food science and technology; some authors also bring expertise from the fields of engineering, chemistry and materials. The diverse range of input will give to the readers a broad overview of the field, boosting their capability to integrate different aspects of fat mimetics for food development.
We expect this book will become a unique source of information for scientists and researchers who are doing research and development with fat mimetics on processed foods.
We want to thank all the authors for their contributions and by lending their excellent perspectives into the best information available. A big thank you to Kerry Powell and Rebecca Ralf, editorial project managers, for their help during the editorial processes and always giving the best advice. We also want to specially thank Fabrice Turon for his contribution in the forward of this book.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the projects: hOLIVEcream – Healthy olive oil based creams enriched with berries for application in bakery and pastry, with the reference n.º NORTE-01–0247-FEDER-046947, co-funded by Norte 2020 – North-Regional Operational Programme under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); IceCare: Cardio-Healthy Functional Ice creams (NORTE-01–0247-FEDER-039927), cofinanced by Norte 2020 and the European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and BetterFat4Meat: Development of structured fats for to replace animal fats in meat products (POCI-01–0247- FEDER-039718), cofinanced by Compete 2020, Portugal 2020 and the European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
Miguel Ângelo Parente Ribeiro Cerqueira
Miguel Ângelo Parente Ribeiro Cerqueira is Staff Researcher in the Food Processing and Nutrition Group at the International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, and his research is focused on developing micro and nanosized bio-based structures for food applications. He works on edible and biodegradable materials for packaging, encapsulation of functional compounds using emergent encapsulation technologies, and structuring gels, such as oleogels.
Miguel holds both a Bachelor and PhD (in Biological Engineering from the University of Minho. He received three scholar merit awards during his Bachelor program, and his PhD thesis was awarded for the best PhD Thesis by the School of Engineering of the University of Minho. During his PhD studies, Miguel attended special projects at the Federal University of Ceará, University of Aveiro, and University College Cork. In 2011, he started as his Postdoctoral Researcher studies at UM and undertook special studies at the University of Vigo, University of Campinas) and Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology – CSIC. He authored over 130 scientific articles, published 20 book chapters, received two patents, and has edited three books. Miguel supervised more than 15 students (PhD and MSc). He is co-founder of two start-ups (Improveat, Lda in 2013 and 2BNanoFood, Lda in 2020). In 2014, Miguel won the Young Scientist Award and, in 2016, he was selected as Inaugural Member of the International Academy of Food Science and Technology Early Career Scientist Section both organized by the International Union of Food Science and Technology. In 2018, he joined the list of Highly Cited Researchers from Clarivate Analytics.
Lorenzo Miguel Pastrana Castro
Lorenzo Miguel Pastrana Castro is Chair of the Research Office and Group Leader of the Food Processing and Nutrition Group at the International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL). He is also a full professor of Food Science at the University of Vigo and is a visiting professor at the Universidade Federal Rural de Pernanbuco (Brasil) and Universita Catolica del Sacro Cuore (Italy).
In 2015, Lorenzo joined the INL as Head of the Department of Life Sciences, a division that included three research units, namely food, environment and health. At INL, his research is oriented with a multidisciplinary approach integrating methods and concepts of biotechnology, nanotechnology, and mathematical modeling. Lorenzo is currently working in three main research areas: Food structure with an emphasis on 3D printing materials, encapsulation technologies for improving functional foods and food personalization, and active and intelligent food packaging. He is author of more than 200 scientific contributions and has four licenced patents relating the development of new food products and process. He was the PI of over 30 national and European research projects and was the contractor and promoter of two food start-ups.
Lorenzo was also heavily active in promoting the connexion between academia and industry as the director of the Knowledge Transfer Office (2009–2010) at the University of Vigo, the founder of the Galician Agri-Food Technology Platform (2006) and as a current member of the scientific board of the Portugal Foods innovation cluster.
Miguel Ângelo Parente Ribeiro Cerqueira* and Lorenzo Miguel Pastrana Castro
INL—International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Braga, Portugal* Corresponding author
The human brain has a high energy demand and thus the brain uses more energy than any other organ. It is also evident when comparing other mammals, or even primates, that humans’ distinctive nutritional needs are a consequence of the evolution of humans brain size. Thus, humans require fat-dense diets to supply energy needs. Fatty acids provide more than twice the calories per gram of proteins or carbohydrates; on the other hand, higher amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids are essential to brain development (Leonard, Snodgrass, and Robertson 2010; Lehner et al. 2021). Since this evolution happened in a fat scarcity environment, humans developed the remarkable ability to detect and metabolize high-fat foods as well as the capacity toward a strong preference for the smell, texture, and taste of lipid-rich foods (Leonard, Snodgrass, and Robertson 2010).
Nowadays, in the diets of people dwelling in developed countries, there is no scarcity of fat anymore, and lipids (fats and oils) are present in the composition of many processed foods where they play important technological, nutritional, and sensorial roles. Their nutritional value is related to essential fatty acid composition and to their role in the absorption of liposoluble vitamins such as vitamins A, D, E, and K. On the other hand, the intake of these molecules increased in recent decades. Consumption of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated lipids is related to health benefits. However, in some western populations, large intakes of saturated and trans fatty acids are responsible for serious health issues linked to non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases (Te Morenga and Montez 2017; Astrup et al. 2019). These findings lead to a demand for new solutions that can guarantee the presence of healthy lipids in foods while the foods’ functional properties are maintained.
The functionalities of solid fats and liquid oils in foods are very diverse; this diversity comes from the fats’ and oils’ physical and chemical properties. Their capacity to form emulsions is essential for producing salad dressings, mayonnaise, gravies, and cheese sauces. Emulsions also modify the flavor and texture of many foods; for example, ice cream’s creamy texture is the result of an emulsion. The melting point of solid saturated fats or liquid oils determines the temperature behaviour of products such as chocolate or ice creams, respectively. Fats and oils in the shortening process are also responsible for tenderizing baked products. Some optical properties of foods, such as the opaque or glossy appearance of milk, are also due to fat. Fats and oils dissolve and preserve flavors while playing an important role in making foods satisfying or making us feel full. Finally, fats and oils are used to transfer heat and to facilitate crust formation during frying. Those functionalities are difficult to mimic; thus, the replacement of fats in foods has been a challenge among researchers and the industry. In the last 20 years, there has been an increase in new solutions within the marketplace, and there have been new developments within the scientific community.
The use of lipids in food formulation is widespread. Lipids are present in ingredients added to foods (normally in minor amounts), or they are added directly to foods in the form of vegetable oils or animal fat. Foods such as margarine, bakery products, chocolates, and spreads are some foods where lipids are used. One of the most commonly used strategies to change lipids’ properties is hydrogenation, where the liquid fats are converted into solid and semi-solid fats with the aim of achieving different functionalities. In the past, partially hydrogenated vegetable fats were used to improve the physical properties of food products, however, several studies have shown trans fatty acids (TFAs) that result from the hydrogenation process have harmful effects on human health, showing that partially hydrogenated vegetable fats are one of the primary sources of industrially-produced TFAs in foods. As a result, in 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that partially hydrogenated oils, the main source of artificial trans fats in processed foods, are not generally recognized as safe (GRAS). They gave the companies until 1 January 2020 to stop distributing food containing partially hydrogenated oils (FDA 2018). Also, the European Commission (EU) limited the use of trans fats, limiting the presence of 2 grams per 100 grams of total fat; in this case, the trans fats naturally occurring in the fat of animal origin are not included (European Commission 2019).
As an alternative, the industry started using saturated fatty acids (SFA), which can be obtained by fractionating oils, such as palm oil. Palm oil is one of the most used sources of fats for foods due to its low price, texture and rheological properties, high stability against oxidation. and good storage time. However, due to the high amount of saturated fats in palm oil, high consumption of palm oil can lead to some health problems. Studies showed that the consumption of saturated fats (except for stearic acid) influences cholesterol levels in the blood and leads to cardiovascular diseases (Zhu, Bo, and Liu 2019). The World Health Organization’s current guidelines for a healthy diet mentions that reducing the amount of total fat intake to less than 30% of total energy intake helps prevent unhealthy weight gain in adults; further, the risk of developing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is lowered by a) reducing saturated fats to less than 10% of total energy intake; b) reducing trans fats to less than 1% of total energy intake; and c) replacing both saturated fats and trans fats with unsaturated and polyunsaturated fats (WHO 2020). The European Union has also promoted healthier foods by allowing food producers to have a nutrition claim on their products’ labels. This nutrition claim is related to a food product’s particular beneficial nutritional property that can be related to energy or to a specific compound present in the food product. There are eight nutrition claims directly related to fats, namely: 1) low fat, 2) fat-free, 3) low saturated fat, 4) saturated fat-free, 5) source of omega-3 fatty acids, 6) high omega-3 fatty acids, 7) high monounsaturated fat, and 8) high polyunsaturated fat (European Commission 2022).
In addition to the health issues related to the consumption of some fats, there is a huge concern, among the entire food industry, related to the environmental impact of oil production. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), global livestock production makes up 14.5% of all anthropogenic (human-caused) emissions, i.e. 7.1 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent per year (Gerber 2013). In the case of lipids, one of the great examples is palm oil, where some studies revealed the considerable impact of lipid production on deforestation and the release of CO2 (Meijaard et al., 2020). In this regard, the use of fat mimetics (that can be based on other vegetable oils) can bring some new insights and possibilities to the industry.
Therefore, the removal of hydrogenated fats and the suggested limitation on the consumption of saturated fats has been changing how the food industry looks at lipids. There is a real need for healthier, trans fatty acid-free, stable, and solid-like fats, which maintain their structure at ambient temperatures, assuring a longer shelf-life. One of the solutions are the fat replacers that can be divided into fat substitutes, fat mimetics, or fat extenders, depending on their chemical composition and physical behaviour. Fat mimetics are one of the most studied alternatives, where the use of physically structured oils (oleogels) seems to be one of the most promising routes. This is related to the way they are produced, mostly using only food ingredients and without chemically modifying the lipids, thus presenting some benefits towards the sustainability and clean label trend. But also, other fat mimetics based on proteins and carbohydrates have shown their applicability and are already used in several commercial products.
In 2017, FAO pointed out several food trends (FAO 2018). Some of those are related to the increasing population, the dietary transition in low- and middle-income countries, diet-related diseases and sustainability. Also, consumer engagement has been seen by several stakeholders as a food trend, where a consumer’s behaviour and perception have a massive impact on the future direction of the agri-food system and companies’ decisions. Consumers are looking for healthy and more natural products, alternative proteins, and products that can be considered clean label and sustainable. Therefore, the industry needs new technologies and strategies to answer those demands. One of the strategies can be fat mimetics; for example, the use of fat mimetics can guarantee the reduction of unhealthy fats or/and their replacement by mono- and polyunsaturated fats and, simultaneously, offer technical functionalities similar to fats.
Plant-based foods and meat alternatives are also food trends that fat mimetics strategies can greatly impact. While proteins and hydrocolloids are already used to develop those products, incorporating oils to develop plant-based foods with a balanced lipid profile is still a challenge. Therefore, using fat mimetics could be a way to tailor the lipid profile of these kinds of products.
Lipid-based fat mimetics mainly use vegetable oils, but it is also possible to use oils obtained from microalgae, insects and even fermentation. The options play a big role in developing more sustainable fat alternatives. Fat mimetics strategies could help overcome technological challenges.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the projects: hOLIVEcream – Healthy olive oil based creams enriched with berries for application in bakery and pastry, with the reference n.º NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-046947, co-funded by Norte 2020 – North-Regional Operational Programme under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); IceCare: Cardio-Healthy Functional Ice creams (NORTE-01-0247-FEDER-039927), co-financed by Norte 2020 and the European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and BetterFat4Meat: Development of structured fat for use in meat products by replacement of animal fat (POCI-01-0247- FEDER-039718). Co-financed by Compete 2020, Portugal 2020 and the European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
Astrup, A., Bertram, H.C.S., Bonjour, J.-P., de Groot, L.Cp., Otto, M.C., Feeny, E.L., Garg, M.L., Givens, I., Kok, F.J., Krauss, M.K., Lamarche, B., Lecerf, J-M., Legrand, P., McKinley, M., Micha, R., Michalski, M-C., Mozaffarian, D., and Soedamah-Muthu, S.S. (2019). WHO draft guidelines on dietary saturated and trans fatty acids: time for a new approach?
BMJ
366: l4137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4137.
European Comission (2019). Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/649.
Official Journal of the European Union
17–20. doi: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1433.
European Commission (2022).
Nutrition claims
.
https://food.ec.europa.eu/safety/labelling-and-nutrition/nutrition-and-health-claims/nutrition-claims_en
(accessed 1 June 2022).
FAO (2018).
The Future of Food and Agriculture – Trends and Challenges
. Rome.
FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) (2018). Trans fat.
https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/trans-fat
(accessed 5 June 2022).
Gerber, P.J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., and Tempio, G. (2013).
Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock – A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities.
Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Lehner, A., Staub, K., Aldakak, L., Eppenberger, P., Rühli, F., Martin, R., and Bender, N.P.P. (2021). Impact of omega-3 fatty acid DHA and EPA supplementation in pregnant or breast-feeding women on cognitive performance of children: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nutrition Reviews
79 (5): 585–598. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa060.
Leonard, W., Snodgrass, J., and Robertson, M. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on fat ingestion and metabolism in humans. In:
Fat Detection: Taste, Texture, and Post Ingestive Effects
(ed. J.P. Montmayeur and J. le Coutre), 3–18. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.1201/9781420067767-c1.
Meijaard, E., Brooks, T.M., Carlson, K.M., Slade, E.M., Garcia-Ulloa, J., Gaveau, D.L., Ser Huay Lee, J., Santika, T., Juffe-Bignoli, D., Struebig, M., Wich, S., Ancrenaz, M., Koh, L.P., Zamira, N., Abrams, J.F., Prins, H.H., Sendashonga, C.N., Murdiyarso, D., Furumo, P.R., … Sheil, D., Slade, E. (2020). The environmental impacts of palm oil in context.
Nature Plants
6 (12): 1418–1426. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00813-w.
Te Morenga, L. and Montez, J.M. (2017). Health effects of saturated and trans-fatty acid intake in children and adolescents: Aystematic review and meta-analysis.
PloS One
12 (11): e0186672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186672.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2020).
Healthy diet
.
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet
(accessed 1 June 2022).
Zhu, Y., Bo, Y., and Liu, Y. (2019). Dietary total fat, fatty acids intake, and risk of cardiovascular disease: A dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Lipids in Health and Disease
18 (1). doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1035-2.