0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions," Edwin Abbott Abbott employs satirical narrative to explore complex themes of dimension, social hierarchy, and perception through the eyes of a two-dimensional square. The novel, written in 1884, takes the form of a mathematical and philosophical allegory, inviting readers into a geometrically constrained society where the shape of an individual determines their social standing. Abbott'Äôs whimsical yet incisive prose combines elements of science fiction and social commentary, reflecting the Victorian anxieties surrounding rigid class structures and the limitations imposed by convention and perspective. Edwin Abbott Abbott, a noted English schoolmaster, theologian, and writer, was deeply influenced by the juxtaposition of mathematical concepts and societal critique. His background in education and his interest in geometric figures provided a unique lens through which he could explore the absurdities of social stratification. Abbott's erudition and wit shine through as he critiques the societal norms of his day whilst pondering the possibilities of higher dimensions, thereby encouraging readers to question their own perceptions and realities. "Flatland" remains a thought-provoking classic, appealing to both scholars and general readers curious about the intersections of mathematics, philosophy, and social theory. Its imaginative narrative challenges us to rethink our understanding of dimensions, both literal and metaphorical, making it an essential read for those seeking to engage with enduring questions about identity and existence in a multidimensional world. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
Flatland
Table of Contents
Introduction
What seems like the whole world may be only a partial view shaped by habit, power, and the limits of imagination. Edwin Abbott Abbott’s Flatland, first published in 1884, is a short satirical novella that uses the apparatus of geometric fantasy to examine social order and intellectual constraint. Set in a rigorously two-dimensional realm populated by polygons, it blends playful mathematical conceit with pointed cultural commentary. The book belongs to Victorian-era speculative literature, yet it reads less as a technical treatise than as an allegorical narrative designed to unsettle certainty. Its enduring appeal lies in how quickly its clever premise becomes a mirror for ordinary assumptions.
The story presents a world where every being is a plane figure and where identity is legible in angles, edges, and symmetry. Everyday life in Flatland is governed by rules that are at once practical for navigation and oppressive in their social consequences. The setting’s strict geometry becomes a framework for etiquette, education, and public safety, and the smallest deviation can be treated as a threat. Abbott builds this environment with brisk confidence, making the unfamiliar feel systematic and self-evident. Readers are invited to learn its customs as though they were natural laws, a method that makes the later challenges to those laws feel both startling and inevitable.
Flatland is narrated by A. Square, a respectable member of his society who writes with the composed authority of someone explaining an orderly universe. His voice is didactic, observant, and occasionally complacent, and the book’s humor often arises from the gap between his certainty and what the reader can infer. Abbott’s style alternates between exposition and narrative episodes, moving from descriptions of social ranks to incidents that test the narrator’s understanding. The tone is controlled rather than melodramatic, and the satirical edge remains clear without relying on cruelty. As a reading experience, it rewards attention to how language naturalizes hierarchy and how logic can be used to defend custom.
The premise develops from an initial tour of Flatland’s norms into encounters that complicate what its inhabitants consider possible. Without relying on sensational twists, Abbott gradually widens the conceptual frame, inviting readers to reflect on how perception is conditioned by environment and education. The book’s ingenuity lies in treating dimensions not merely as abstract concepts but as lived experience, with consequences for communication and belief. Because the narrator’s outlook is both intelligent and limited, the story encourages readers to hold two perspectives at once: the internal coherence of a system and its potential arbitrariness. This tension keeps the novella lively, as comedy and critique reinforce rather than cancel each other.
A central theme is the relationship between knowledge and authority, especially how institutions can define reality by controlling what may be discussed or taught. Flatland also scrutinizes class stratification, depicting a society that equates moral worth with geometric form and treats rank as a matter of nature rather than policy. Gender is another charged axis in the book’s satire, presented through a structure that reveals how fear and stereotype can be formalized into social rules. These themes are not offered as detached abstractions; they operate through the narrator’s assumptions and the community’s routines. The result is a compact study of how a culture can turn partial understanding into comprehensive doctrine.
At the same time, Flatland is a meditation on the difficulty of imagining alternatives when language, education, and prestige all reinforce the same boundaries. The geometric metaphor makes an epistemological point accessible: one can reason flawlessly within a framework and still miss what the framework excludes. Abbott shows how societies protect their explanatory models by punishing doubt, pathologizing curiosity, or reducing dissent to ignorance. Yet the book does not dismiss reason; it distinguishes between reasoning and openness, between clarity and completeness. Its enduring intellectual pleasure comes from watching a mind trained for certainty confront the discomfort of new categories, and from seeing how quickly certainty can harden into dogma.
For contemporary readers, Flatland remains relevant because it captures mechanisms of social sorting and intellectual gatekeeping that persist across eras, even when the specific hierarchies differ. It speaks to modern debates about expertise, education, and the pressures that make communities resist unfamiliar evidence or perspectives. The book also continues to resonate in discussions of mathematics and imagination, not as a lesson in geometry but as a demonstration of how metaphors can expand thought. Its brevity and controlled narration make it approachable, while its layered satire invites rereading. Above all, it reminds readers that understanding is often bounded less by intelligence than by the stories a society permits itself to tell.
Synopsis
Edwin Abbott Abbott’s Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (1884) presents itself as a memoir by A. Square, a respectable resident of a two-dimensional world. Flatland is a plane populated by geometric figures whose bodies and social identities coincide: polygons are citizens, women are straight line segments, and visible angle and regularity are treated as measures of worth. Through A. Square’s voice, the book introduces the rules of perception in two dimensions, everyday customs, and the ways language and education are shaped by spatial limits. From the outset, the narrative links geometry to class, authority, and inherited privilege.
paragraphs
The account explains Flatland’s rigid hierarchy: irregular or sharp-angled figures are feared and controlled, while many-sided polygons form a governing elite. Social mobility is described as limited and bound to an ideology that presents rank as natural. A. Square recounts domestic life, professional interactions, and public rituals that reinforce conformity, including prescribed behaviors designed to prevent misunderstandings in a world where sight reduces others to shifting line-segments. The narration repeatedly emphasizes how easily perception can be mistaken and how law and religion step in to stabilize belief. These early sections establish satire of Victorian social structures and the fragility of “common sense.”
paragraphs
A. Square then describes growing intellectual restlessness, prompted by conversations and thought experiments about dimensions beyond Flatland. He addresses how official institutions treat unorthodox speculation as dangerous, and how citizens internalize the boundaries of what may be imagined. The narrative’s argumentative flow increasingly turns from social description to epistemology: what can be known when one’s senses are constrained by one’s world’s geometry. A. Square’s explanations make clear that in Flatland, even the idea of a third dimension seems contradictory, because the language of extension is derived entirely from planar experience. His curiosity sets up conflict with entrenched authority.
paragraphs
The story shifts around the time of A. Square’s recurring annual dream, in which he visits Lineland, a one-dimensional realm. There, he attempts to communicate the concept of two dimensions to a Line, only to encounter the same incomprehension and resistance that Flatlanders show toward higher space. The dream functions as a mirror for A. Square’s later experiences, illustrating how intelligence and good faith do not guarantee mutual understanding across radically different perceptual frameworks. It also underscores the book’s method: Abbott uses nested worlds to dramatize how metaphysical certainty can rest on limited evidence. A. Square awakens with the implications lingering, unsettled but intrigued by the analogy.
Historical Context
Edwin Abbott Abbott published Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions in London in 1884, during the late Victorian period. Britain at the time was a constitutional monarchy with a powerful Parliament and a rapidly expanding civil service. Urbanization and industrial growth had enlarged the middle classes and intensified debates about social rank, education, and authority. Print culture was vigorous, with periodicals and inexpensive books circulating widely among literate readers. Abbott, an Anglican clergyman and schoolmaster, wrote within this environment of public argument over science, religion, and social organization.
Abbott was educated at the City of London School and St John’s College, Cambridge, and became headmaster of the City of London School in 1865, a prominent institution for middle-class boys. Victorian schooling emphasized classics, mathematics, and disciplined moral formation, while examinations increasingly shaped educational opportunity. Abbott also wrote textbooks and works of literary and biblical criticism, reflecting the era’s commitment to systematic learning and public debate. This institutional background helps explain Flatland’s didactic tone and its interest in how knowledge is transmitted, policed, and used to sustain hierarchy.
The nineteenth century saw major developments in geometry and mathematical thought that formed an immediate intellectual backdrop to Flatland. Non-Euclidean geometries were publicized in Europe after earlier work by Gauss, Lobachevsky, and Bolyai, and later synthesized and extended by Bernhard Riemann in 1854. In Britain, mathematicians and popular writers discussed higher dimensions and alternative geometrical systems, especially in the latter half of the century. Such discussions entered general culture through lectures and essays, making dimensional analogy a recognizable tool for explaining limits of perception and the relativity of viewpoint.
Victorian science and philosophy also emphasized observation, classification, and laws of nature. Positivism, associated with Auguste Comte, influenced debates about what counted as reliable knowledge, while empiricism and the prestige of the natural sciences shaped public standards of argument. At the same time, religious thought confronted new intellectual pressures; Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) intensified disputes about human origins and the authority of scripture. Flatland draws on this climate by using a quasi-scientific narrative voice and by exploring how communities enforce orthodox explanations of the world against unsettling new ideas.
Social hierarchy in Victorian Britain was pronounced and publicly coded through class, occupation, education, and gender norms. The franchise expanded through the Reform Acts of 1867 and 1884, but political power remained unevenly distributed, and deference to rank was deeply embedded in social life. Women were largely excluded from parliamentary politics; the Married Women’s Property Acts (1870, 1882) marked significant legal change, while organized suffrage campaigning grew later in the century. Abbott’s lifetime also included intense public discussion of ‘separate spheres’ ideology, informing the era’s contested assumptions about authority and citizenship.
The British Empire reached a high point in the late nineteenth century, with imperial administration and ideas of ‘civilization’ widely promoted in schools and popular media. Imperial governance often relied on categorizing peoples and territories, and it encouraged confidence in bureaucratic order and social ranking. Domestically, professionalization expanded—law, medicine, teaching, and the clergy developed stronger institutional identities and gatekeeping. These tendencies toward classification and controlled access to status resonate with Flatland’s systematic depiction of a society that assigns value and privilege through rigid, legible markers and treats deviation as threatening.
Censorship and the policing of dissent were prominent concerns in Victorian public life, even as press freedom and open debate expanded. Obscenity prosecutions, controversies over radical publications, and anxieties about social disorder shaped discussions of what should be permitted in print and education. In religious contexts, disputes over biblical criticism and doctrine could produce institutional sanctions, and in political contexts, fears of revolution or unrest influenced attitudes toward reform. Flatland’s careful satirical approach—framing critique through allegory and mathematical fantasy—fits a period when indirect forms of social criticism were common and often strategically safer.
Against this background, Flatland uses the language of geometry and the format of a ‘romance’ to comment on Victorian confidence in orderly classification and on the social consequences of rigid hierarchy. The book’s emphasis on rank, conformity, and the regulation of knowledge reflects late nineteenth-century debates about education, authority, and the boundaries of accepted belief. Its engagement with higher dimensions echoes contemporary mathematical and scientific discussions, while its portrayal of institutional orthodoxy and social stratification parallels familiar Victorian structures. In this way, Abbott’s work functions as a historically grounded satire on the intellectual and social habits of his era.
