0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
In "Hodge and His Masters," Richard Jefferies crafts a poignant narrative that intricately weaves the lives of rural workers with the expansive landscape of the English countryside in the late 19th century. Through the titular character, Hodge'—an embodiment of the agricultural laborer'—Jefferies explores themes of social class, labor conditions, and man's relationship with nature. The prose is imbued with a lyrical quality that captures the beauty and brutality of rural life, reflecting the author's deep respect for nature and profound understanding of the struggles of the common man, making the work a significant literary contribution to the pastoral tradition. Richard Jefferies, a prominent voice in Victorian literature, was born into a farming family and often found inspiration from his experiences in the rural environment. His personal connection to the land and the challenges faced by agricultural workers informs the authenticity of Hodge's character and the compelling narrative. Jefferies's empathy for the laborers coupled with his keen observation skills allowed him to present an unflinching depiction of societal disparities, which resonates with the social reform movements of his time. This book is a must-read for those interested in social history, labor studies, and pastoral literature. Jefferies's masterful storytelling not only captivates the reader but invites reflection on the perennial struggles for dignity and recognition in labor. "Hodge and His Masters" remains a vital text that continues to echo the challenges of rural life, making it both relevant and resonant in today's context. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
At the meeting place of field and farmhouse, Hodge and His Masters traces how rural labor and authority contend with one another amid the pressures of a changing countryside.
Richard Jefferies’s Hodge and His Masters is a work of nonfiction that blends social observation with the sensibility of a nature writer. It examines the English countryside during the late Victorian period, when agriculture and its communities were negotiating economic and cultural change. First published in the early 1880s, the book belongs to the tradition of rural reportage and reflective essays rather than to plotted narrative. Jefferies writes from close acquaintance with southern English landscapes and the people who worked them, situating his portraits within a recognizably nineteenth-century world of farms, lanes, market towns, and the institutions that shaped rural life.
Rather than unfolding a single story, the book assembles a mosaic of scenes and character studies, drawing readers through cottages, fields, fairs, and farmyards. Jefferies’s method is observational and patient: he notices how tools are used, how work is divided, how weather and soil determine the day’s possibilities. The prose is measured and attentive, offering a calm yet probing gaze that avoids caricature. Readers can expect essays that build a cumulative picture of laborers and employers, their negotiations and frictions, and the subtle codes by which rural society organizes itself, all conveyed with an ear for cadence and a steady, humane curiosity.
Central to the book is the relationship between those who work the land and those who direct or profit from that work. Jefferies attends to the interplay of custom and contract, showing how unwritten expectations meet shifting economic realities. The themes of power, dignity, and survival recur, as do questions about how technology, markets, and education were reshaping village habits. The rhythms of the seasons, the calculation of wages, and the maintenance of land and stock become lenses through which to read class, aspiration, and resilience. The result is social criticism anchored in the texture of everyday tasks and the material facts of the countryside.
The title invokes the stock figure long used to denote the farm laborer, and Jefferies examines how that simplified label obscures the variety of rural lives. He registers differences of age, temperament, skill, and circumstance, resisting the urge to turn laborers into mere symbols. Likewise, the term masters encompasses a spectrum, from landowners and tenant farmers to stewards and tradespeople whose interests overlap and diverge. By setting these groups in conversation—sometimes literal, often implied—Jefferies reveals a rural order that is less monolithic than it appears, built on bargains, pride, and practical necessity rather than on simple deference or command.
For contemporary readers, the book’s questions remain strikingly relevant. It asks how a society values manual skill, how economic change tests communities, and how stereotypes can erode understanding. Its attention to food production, land use, and the pressures felt by workers resonates with present debates about the rural-urban divide, precarious labor, and environmental stewardship. Jefferies’s steady, observational approach offers an antidote to abstraction: by staying close to tools, paths, and people, he invites reflection on policy through the grain of lived experience, reminding us that broader systems are sustained—or strained—by the particulars of daily work.
To read Hodge and His Masters is to enter a world where the texture of hedgerows and the cadence of market days shape social realities. Jefferies’s essays offer clarity without sentimentality, empathy without illusion, and a firm sense that rural life contains multitudes. The book does not promise dramatic revelations; it offers something rarer—a disciplined attentiveness that accumulates into insight. Readers will find a portrait of labor and leadership at once historically grounded and enduringly recognizable, a study of how people make their lives within constraints and possibilities. In its quiet way, it encourages us to look harder, listen longer, and reconsider what we think we know.
Hodge and His Masters, first published in 1880, presents a broad survey of English rural life in the late nineteenth century. Richard Jefferies arranges a sequence of essays that examine the agricultural laborer, nicknamed "Hodge," and the various authorities and employers who shape his world. The book describes work, wages, customs, and institutions, along with the economic forces that influence farms and villages. It moves from the fields to the farmhouse, from the squire’s estate to the market town, noting practices, routines, and relationships. The result is a structured account of how labor, land, and management interact during a period of agricultural change and pressure.
The opening chapters focus on Hodge’s daily realities. Jefferies explains the seasonal round of tasks—ploughing, sowing, hoeing, reaping—and the rhythm of long hours, weather, and piecework. He outlines wages, cottage conditions, allotments, and household economies, emphasizing how families stretch resources through gardens, gleaning, and small livestock. Local customs, friendly societies, chapels, and the village inn appear as social anchors. Attention is paid to thrift and scarcity, to the value of tools and boots, and to the calculations behind bread, bacon, and fuel. These sections establish the practical environment of labor and set the baseline against which other influences are measured.
From work and subsistence, the narrative turns to mobility, organization, and aspiration among laborers. Jefferies records the effects of school boards and rising literacy, the talk of trade unions, and the attraction of towns, railways, and emigration. He notes negotiations over hiring, issues of tied cottages, and fluctuations in demand for hands. Harvest contracts, winter slackness, and relief practices are set within the context of parish responsibilities and local authorities. Without promoting a position, the text shows how small changes—education, news, transport—alter expectations and bargaining, placing Hodge within larger movements that extend beyond parish boundaries and traditional deference.
The book then profiles the “masters”: farmers, land agents, squires, and parsons, each occupying a role in the rural hierarchy. Jefferies explains tenancies and leases, rent day conventions, the duties of bailiffs and stewards, and the financial pressures of stock, seed, and fixtures. He outlines the parson’s concerns with tithes and schools, the squire’s responsibilities for estate management and game, and the farmer’s day-to-day balancing of costs with weather and prices. Relations between classes appear through hiring, discipline, and favor, but also through mutual dependence on successful harvests and orderly markets. This section links individual decisions to the wider structure of landholding.
Attention shifts to trade and distribution. Jefferies describes corn markets, cattle fairs, and the milk and butter supply, showing how railways, carriers, and urban demand reshape rural production. He traces the roles of millers, dealers, and middlemen, the timing of market days, and the way prices transmit risk back to the farm. The agricultural depression of the period frames discussions of falling returns, imports, and credit. Insurance, bills, and the corn returns receive practical treatment, illustrating how figures drive decisions about ploughing up or laying down grass. By following produce from field to town, the book situates farm choices within a chain of exchange.
Methods and machinery occupy a central place in the midsections. Jefferies surveys reaping and threshing machines, steam ploughs, drills, and improved horse-gear, noting their effect on speed, labor needs, and capital outlay. He covers drainage schemes, manures, and rotational systems, as well as breeding, shearing, and flock management on downland farms. The skills of hedging, ditching, and thatching are recorded alongside the gradual replacement of some crafts. The narrative shows how mechanical and chemical changes reshape work patterns, require different knowledge, and redistribute employment across seasons. This overview connects innovation to both opportunity and strain for farmers and laborers alike.
Village life broadens the account beyond the farm gate. Jefferies examines parish institutions—church, vestry, school—and the calendar of feasts, fairs, and clubs. He outlines recreation and sport, including cricket, coursing, and the organized pursuits of shooting and hunting. Gamekeepers, licenses, and the enforcement of game laws introduce questions of trespass, poaching, and rural policing. Petty sessions, magistrates, and small disputes illustrate how local justice operates. These chapters show how authority is enacted in everyday interactions and how custom, law, and leisure intersect. They also indicate how reputations, patronage, and small favors influence opportunities in tight-knit communities.
Jefferies interleaves social observation with natural history. He describes hedgerows, fields, and woodlands through the seasons, noting birds, wildflowers, and weather signs that guide rural work. The chalk downs and meadows provide examples of how soil and slope determine stock or corn, and how path, stile, and lane organize daily movement. Attention to daylight, wind, and rainfall connects farm routine to environmental rhythms. These passages explain the practical knowledge by which farmers and laborers judge time, tasks, and risks. Rather than isolate nature from economy, the narrative places landscape as a constant factor in planning and endurance.
The concluding impression is of a system defined by interdependence and constraint. Hodge’s labor, the master’s capital, the landlord’s estate, and the market’s prices form a chain sensitive to weather, technology, and policy. Jefferies records a countryside adapting to depression, mechanization, and new communications while retaining persistent customs and hierarchies. The central message is descriptive rather than argumentative: to show how rural England works—its routines, pressures, and adjustments—by attending closely to people, practices, and places. In presenting the links between field, household, and market, the book offers a coherent portrait of an agricultural world in transition.
Richard Jefferies situates Hodge and His Masters in the rural parishes and market towns of southern England during the late Victorian period, especially the 1870s. Drawing on his Wiltshire upbringing around Coate near Swindon, he observes villages, estates, and farmsteads across the Home Counties and the Thames Valley, with excursions to the South Downs and wooded estates of Berkshire and Hampshire. The book’s time and place coincide with a transitional countryside: railways linked once-isolated markets, tenant farming confronted volatile prices, and the squire-parson-tenant-labourer hierarchy persisted under strain. Seasonal routines, hiring customs, and parish institutions are shown against the backdrop of a rural economy entering the Great Agricultural Depression after 1873.
The Great Agricultural Depression, conventionally dated from 1873 to the mid‑1890s, forms the decisive historical backdrop to Jefferies’s observations. British arable farming suffered a sustained price collapse driven by global integration: steamships and railroads slashed transatlantic freight costs, opening the floodgates to cheap North American and Russian grain. Wheat prices, which averaged about 56 shillings per quarter in the late 1860s, fell to the mid‑30s by 1880 and to roughly 31 shillings by the mid‑1890s. The Suez Canal (opened 1869) and the spread of refrigerated shipping in the 1880s further intensified competition by enabling imports of meat and dairy. Weather shocks compounded the structural crisis. The harvest of 1879, famously cold and sodden, was one of the worst of the century, following poor seasons in 1877 and 1878; mildew, lodged corn, and rotting root crops devastated returns. Farmers shifted land from cereals to pasture, negotiated rent abatements, or failed outright; Board of Trade figures recorded swelling grain imports and stagnant domestic output. Tenant right and compensation for improvements became urgent questions as capital sunk in drainage, manures, and buildings could not be recovered under traditional leases. Wages fell or hours lengthened; underemployment and winter scarcity returned. In Hodge and His Masters, Jefferies records the uneasy talk in market inns, the thinning rickyards, and the frayed bargains between farmer and labourer. His portraits of the hedger, carter, and cowman chart how a global price revolution and the catastrophic season of 1879 translated into smaller pay packets, pawned tools, and migration from the chalk downs and clay vales to towns or overseas. The book thus mirrors, with local exactitude, the national rural depression and its social toll.
The agricultural labourers’ movement surged in 1872 with the founding of the National Agricultural Labourers’ Union at Wellesbourne, Warwickshire, under Joseph Arch. Rapidly spreading through the southern and midland counties, NALU organized strikes and negotiations that briefly lifted weekly wages from around 10 to 12 shillings toward 15 to 18 shillings in places during 1872–1874. Membership peaked near 86,000 by 1874 before employer retaliation, falling prices, and the depression eroded gains and reduced the union’s strength. Emigration funds sent families to Canada and Australia as rural prospects dimmed. Jefferies’s depictions of the farm hand’s bargaining, pride, and vulnerability register the aftershocks of this organizing wave and its retreat under economic pressure.
Constitutional change reshaped rural politics around the time of the book. The Second Reform Act of 1867 enlarged the urban working-class electorate, but it was the Representation of the People Act 1884 and the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 that extended the county franchise and rebalanced constituencies, bringing many agricultural labourers into the electorate. The Corrupt and Illegal Practices Prevention Act 1883 curbed treating and intimidation at elections, weakening landlord control. Political meetings in market towns and public houses became more consequential, even as deference and employment ties still weighed on choices. Jefferies’s rural assemblies, canvasses, and landlord-tenant relations capture a countryside hesitantly adjusting to mass politics and the new weight of the farm worker’s vote.
Game preservation and the enforcement of the Game Laws structured daily frictions between classes. The Game Act 1831 defined the legal framework, while the Night Poaching Act 1828 and the Poaching Prevention Act 1862 empowered constables and keepers to stop and search suspects after dark. Southern estates expanded pheasant coverts and hare preserves in the 1860s–1870s, staging grand autumn shoots that foregrounded elite leisure. Petty sessions registers filled with trespass and poaching cases, fines, and imprisonments. Jefferies’s sketches of gamekeepers, warrens, and hedgerow ambushes convey how wildlife management symbolized proprietorial rights and how seasonal hunger or resentment could pull Hodge into illicit snares, embodying the social tension of the village.
Technological and scientific change altered the labour process and farm capital structure. Steam ploughing systems popularized by John Fowler in the 1850s, portable steam threshing engines, and American reaping and mowing machines diffused unevenly by the 1870s. Agricultural chemistry advanced through John Bennet Lawes and Joseph Henry Gilbert’s experiments at Rothamsted (from 1843), encouraging superphosphates and ammoniacal manures, while guano imports earlier mid-century had transformed some rotations. Railways, completed across much of rural England by the 1860s, integrated markets for milk, meat, and grain, but also sharpened exposure to global prices. Jefferies chronicles threshing gangs, steam contractors, seed drills, and horse-hoeing, noting both productivity gains and the displacement or deskilling of traditional crafts central to Hodge’s identity and bargaining power.
Rural welfare and social provision were reshaped in the later nineteenth century. The Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 had established unions and workhouses; its deterrent ethos still shadowed village relief in the 1870s. Public Health Acts in 1872 and 1875 created rural sanitary authorities and consolidated powers over water, drainage, and nuisances, modestly improving conditions. The Elementary Education Act 1870, followed by attendance measures in 1876 and 1880, expanded schooling for cottagers’ children, reducing child field labour and reframing generational expectations. Allotment agitation gathered force, with the Allotments Extension Act 1882 pressing charities to provide garden ground, a prelude to later statutes. Jefferies’s portraits of schoolrooms, cottage gardens, and parish boards show policy filtering into everyday sustenance.
Hodge and His Masters functions as a social and political critique by anatomizing power, dependency, and economic insecurity in the late Victorian countryside. Jefferies exposes how wage cuts, tied cottages, and winter underemployment disciplined labourers, how game preservation criminalized subsistence, and how electoral reforms only slowly diluted landlord influence. He shows the pressures of global markets made intimate in household economies and the inequities embedded in tenancy law and parish institutions. By rendering the farm worker as an observant, skilled agent rather than a caricature, the book challenges paternalist mythologies and underscores structural injustice in landholding, representation, and rural welfare during the agricultural depression era.