0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
In "Lady Hester; Or, Ursula's Narrative," Charlotte M. Yonge intricately weaves a tale that encompasses the complexities of Victorian society, exploring themes of identity, duty, and the struggle for self-determination. Written in a rich, evocative style, the novel employs a first-person narrative that invites readers into Ursula's intimate thoughts and experiences. The prose is characterized by its vivid descriptions and psychological depth, allowing for a profound exploration of the characters' moral dilemmas against the backdrop of social expectations prevalent in the 19th century. Yonge's keen observations of domestic life and the nuances of women's roles offer an authentic representation of the era's challenges and aspirations. Charlotte M. Yonge was a prolific author, educator, and a pivotal figure in the world of Victorian literature. Growing up in a family that valued education and literary pursuits, she was influenced by the sociopolitical climate of her time, particularly the evolving roles of women. Yonge's own life experiences, including her steadfast commitment to philanthropy and social reform, informed her writing, allowing her to craft authentic characters who grapple with the constraints imposed by society. "Lady Hester; Or, Ursula's Narrative" is a compelling read for anyone interested in the intersection of gender, morality, and identity within the framework of Victorian literature. Yonge's nuanced storytelling and insightful character development make this novel not only a significant literary work but also a meaningful exploration of the struggles for autonomy and selfhood that resonate today. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
A portrait of conscience under pressure, Lady Hester; Or, Ursula’s Narrative traces how private loyalties, social expectation, and moral responsibility intersect within a close-knit household to test the limits of duty, affection, and pride, asking what it costs—in reputation, comfort, and self-knowledge—for individuals to act rightly in a world where every choice quietly reshapes family bonds and community trust.
Written by Charlotte M. Yonge, a prominent Victorian novelist, Lady Hester; Or, Ursula’s Narrative belongs to the tradition of domestic realism that examines character through the rhythms of everyday life, parish ties, and family obligations. Set in an English provincial milieu typical of Yonge’s fiction, it reflects the moral seriousness and Anglican sensibility associated with her work. The novel appeared during the later nineteenth century, when Yonge was an established voice, and it exemplifies the period’s interest in ethical formation, social class, and the subtle pressures exerted by kinship and community upon women at the center of household life.
The premise is simple yet quietly compelling: Ursula, whose name shapes the subtitle, frames the account, guiding readers through the circumstances surrounding Lady Hester and those connected to her. Without relying on sensational incident, the narrative builds out of decisions made in drawing rooms, rectories, and village lanes, where reputations are made and tested. Readers enter a world in which a young woman’s position brings obligations she cannot escape, and where an attentive observer maps how kindness, restraint, and misjudgment ripple through families. The result is a clear, spoiler-safe setup: a moral drama rooted in intimate relationships and their unforeseen consequences.
Yonge structures the book as a reflective, often retrospective narrative, giving Ursula a voice that is calm, observant, and judicious rather than showy. The style favors measured pacing, domestic detail, and carefully shaded dialogue, inviting readers to notice small inflections of motive and feeling. Rather than sprinting from crisis to crisis, the prose dwells on character, habit, and the slow education of conscience. This approach rewards patience: the texture of rooms, routines, and rituals becomes the fabric through which ethical questions are tested. The mood is thoughtful and earnest, occasionally tender, and attentive to the dignity of ordinary responsibilities.
Key themes include duty and desire, pride tempered by humility, and the uses—and misuses—of influence within families and local society. The novel is particularly alert to the education of the heart: how guidance, example, and discipline shape the young; how generosity may be confused with indulgence; and how charity requires both feeling and judgment. Questions of class and social expectation appear not as abstract debate but as a daily calculus in visiting, stewarding, and speaking for those in one’s care. Religious life is present as a steady frame, emphasizing integrity, repentance, and service rather than spectacle.
For contemporary readers, the book offers more than period charm: it asks how we define responsibility within networks of privilege and dependence, and how a person’s moral choices can bind or heal a community. Its quiet focus on caregiving, mentorship, and the ethics of influence resonates with current conversations about leadership, emotional labor, and the formation of character in private spaces. The narrative perspective also raises questions about reliability and judgment: what we see, what we miss, and what we learn only in hindsight. In this way, the novel becomes a study in attention—how to look closely and act justly.
Approached on its own terms, Lady Hester; Or, Ursula’s Narrative offers the satisfactions of a Victorian domestic novel: a steady, reflective unfolding, an emphasis on interior change, and a humane curiosity about how people learn to do right. Readers drawn to community-centered stories, moral reflection, and finely observed family dynamics will find the experience immersive rather than hurried. Its concerns remain timely—how to balance affection with principle, charity with wisdom—and its tone invites thoughtful reading in measured portions. As an exemplar of Charlotte M. Yonge’s art, it demonstrates how ordinary lives can carry profound ethical weight without recourse to melodrama.
Ursula, a longtime attendant and confidante in a quiet English country household, recounts the story of Lady Hester, the young noblewoman whose growth and choices shaped the family and parish. The narrative begins with Ursula explaining her station, the long-standing ties between servants and gentry, and the expectations surrounding an heiress raised among watchful elders. Through her steady, practical vantage point, she introduces the house, its routines, and the gentle rural district where reputation and duty carry weight. The frame establishes that what follows is a faithful remembrance, ordered by seasons and occasions, rather than a tale of romance embroidered for effect.
Lady Hester enters the household as a bright, spirited girl, the object of anxious care from an elder relative who values propriety and reserve. Ursula observes the early instruction, the careful balancing of accomplishments and moral discipline, and the subtle friction between nurture and nature. Hester’s quick sympathies and readiness to lead attract affection in the village, yet her pride can chafe at correction. Introductions to neighbors and kinsfolk form her first lessons in rank and responsibility, as she learns how a word or gesture from her carries consequence. The home’s orderly timetables provide both safeguard and constraint.
Young adulthood brings a widening circle. Guests arrive, clerical and military men pass through on parish business or county gatherings, and a few figures stand out as steadying or unsettling influences. Ursula notes contrasts more than names: the sober adviser who counsels patience, the engaging newcomer who appeals to feeling and imagination, and the cousinly companion who holds up a quiet standard of duty. Small misunderstandings arise from etiquette, pride, and the half-spoken language of sympathy. Underneath, questions of inheritance, stewardship, and the future management of the estate begin to press, testing how inclination will be reconciled to obligation.
A season of charitable work in the village becomes the proving ground for Hester’s judgment. Schools and cottages, illnesses and harvests, give occasions for visits that cross class lines, and Ursula mediates between parlors and doorsteps. Hester’s impulsive generosity sometimes oversets plans carefully laid by elders, while her courage carries her into scenes where calm prudence is needed most. A minor scandal, born of gossip and misconstruction, brings first serious censure upon her, and she must weigh whether to accept direction or to act upon private conviction. The episode sets patterns of counsel sought, resisted, and gradually understood.
A family bereavement alters the household’s balance and hints at changes in guardianship and means. With black-edged letters and formal callers, the world grows graver, and practical decisions come forward. Proposals of alliance and future settlement are quietly discussed in drawing rooms and offices, never far from the parish concerns that still claim attention. Faced with an honorable offer that promises safety and station, Hester hesitates, feeling the pull between personal affection and the claims of her position. Ursula’s account keeps to facts, noting who came, what was said, and how the house adapted to its new sobriety.
A breach of trust, sharpened by rumor and an injudicious meeting, opens a rift with those Hester most values. The parish takes sides, kindly or censorious, and an estrangement ensues that touches both home and neighborhood. Just then, a crisis from without intervenes, a sudden illness or accident that calls for presence of mind, endurance, and unselfishness. In the strain of long hours and hidden fatigue, characters reveal themselves more plainly than in drawing-room debate. Ursula records the errands run, the doors watched, and the quiet efforts that can neither be proclaimed nor denied, while the rights and wrongs remain unsettled.
Out of the crisis comes clearer knowledge. Explanations long delayed are forced into the open, documents and testimonies bring motives to light, and those who misjudged are given the chance to amend. Relationships, tested in adversity, begin to mend, though not without reserve and humility. Decisions about residence, income, and the division of cares are reached with more deliberation than before. Hester’s manner softens, her leadership steadies, and she learns to delegate without abdication. Ursula marks the return of ordinary calls and parish rounds, now informed by a firmer sense of where strength ends and wise dependence begins.
The closing movement settles the household into a new order. Arrangements are made that secure the estate’s welfare and the village’s ongoing support, and a partnership is formed that respects both affection and duty. Without dwelt-upon particulars, Ursula intimates celebrations kept modest, rooms refurnished for their future, and charitable works laid on broader foundations. The narrative avoids flourish, emphasizing continuities rather than dramatic reversals. The elder generation withdraws to quieter influence, the younger accepts public trust, and the ties of kin and service that began the story hold still. Home becomes not a stage, but a stewardship.
Across the whole, the book presents character shaped by responsibility in a settled community. It shows how rank can be converted into service, how impulse can be trained into constancy, and how guidance, though resisted, proves a gift. Ursula’s plain, observant voice underscores the value of faithful routine, neighborly duty, and patience with human weakness. The narrative’s design moves from promise to testing to measured fulfillment, keeping large disclosures discreet and everyday duties central. Its purpose is to trace growth without sensational detail, leaving readers with the sense that quiet fidelity, rather than display, secures both happiness and honor.
Set chiefly in a rural English county strongly reminiscent of Charlotte M. Yonge’s own Hampshire, the narrative unfolds across the decades after the Napoleonic Wars and before mid-Victorian consolidation, roughly the 1820s–1840s. A great house, parish church, and nearby market town anchor the social geography: landed estate, village tenantry, and clergy form the interlocking powers of the countryside. Ursula, an older gentlewoman, recounts events with the temporal depth of memory, so the story’s timeframe bridges pre- and post-Reform England. The Anglican parish is central to rhythms of duty, charity, and hierarchy, and the county seat and cathedral city (evoking Winchester) supply legal, ecclesiastical, and commercial points of reference.
The post-1815 economic climate, marked by demobilization after Waterloo (June 18, 1815) and volatile grain prices under the Corn Laws (1815; modified 1828; repealed 1846), strained rural livelihoods. Southern counties saw agrarian protest in the Swing Riots of 1830—machine-breaking and incendiarism in Hampshire, Wiltshire, and Kent—prompting trials and transportations. The Tithe Commutation Act (1836) replaced tithes in kind with monetary rent-charges, reshaping relations between farmers and clergy. In the novel’s world, such pressures are refracted through estate management, parish almsgiving, and paternalistic duty: Ursula’s narrative implies a gentry household navigating tenant distress, while the parsonage mediates conflict over tithes and relief with an emphasis on moral as well as material stewardship.
The Great Reform Act (1832) abolished many rotten boroughs, expanded the county and borough electorate to roughly 18% of adult males, and realigned parliamentary representation toward growing towns. The Municipal Corporations Act (1835) rationalized urban governance, while county elites continued to serve as justices of the peace. In rural constituencies, the landed gentry recalibrated their influence through open meetings and canvassing. The book mirrors this civic transition indirectly: manor, vestry, and assize are recurrent poles of authority, and characters associated with the county bench or with patronage of the living exemplify a softening of unreformed paternalism into a public-minded stewardship encouraged by the new, if limited, representative order.
The New Poor Law (1834) reorganized parishes into Poor Law Unions, centralized relief under elected Boards of Guardians, and promoted workhouse-based assistance, aiming to deter dependency. Implementation produced controversies—Andover Workhouse scandal (1845) exposed abuses—and transformed the role of clergy and gentlewomen in local welfare. Ursula’s narrative reflects the moral debate surrounding relief: charitable visiting, parish schools, and discreet aid emerge as humane alternatives to the stigma of the Union house. While not polemical, the story’s depiction of household economies and disciplined benevolence implicitly critiques rigid deterrence, preferring personal oversight and Christian responsibility to bureaucratic uniformity.
The Oxford Movement (1833–1845) profoundly shaped provincial Anglicanism. John Keble’s Assize Sermon on National Apostasy, preached at St Mary’s, Oxford, on 14 July 1833, is conventionally dated as its inception; soon, Tracts for the Times (1833–1841) by Keble, John Henry Newman, and Edward Bouverie Pusey articulated doctrines of apostolic succession, sacramental life, and the Church’s independence from state encroachment. Parish effects included revived weekly communions, church restorations, surpliced choirs, and sisterhoods for nursing and teaching. In Hampshire, where Yonge lived at Otterbourne and was Keble’s parishioner in nearby Hursley (he became vicar in 1836; the church was rebuilt 1848–1851), these reforms were tangible: fabric renewal, catechesis, and intensified lay discipline. The movement also generated controversy—Newman’s 1845 conversion to Rome, charges of “Romanizing,” and litigations over ritual later culminating in the Public Worship Regulation Act (1874). Lady Hester; Or, Ursula’s Narrative encodes this atmosphere of earnest, orderly parish life: conscientious rectors, the moral centrality of confirmation and communion, and the organized charitable work of upper-class women mirror Tractarian ideals translated into daily practice. Yonge’s alignment with Keble is not merely biographical; it furnishes the novel’s ethical grammar—duty, kenosis, and the sanctification of domestic and parochial ties—offering a concrete social theology against which conflicts over pride, property, and charity are judged.
Railway expansion transformed provincial England between 1830 and 1850: the Liverpool and Manchester Railway opened in 1830; trunk lines such as the London and Birmingham (1838) and the Great Western (1838–1841) followed; the London and Southampton Railway reached Hampshire in 1839. Faster travel linked market towns to metropolitan finance and fashion, altered agricultural marketing, and enabled greater mobility for servants and tradesmen. In the novel’s milieu, the incursion of the railway functions as a quiet catalyst: visits to the cathedral city become easier, news and books arrive sooner, and the estate’s semi-seclusion is subtly eroded, pressing characters to negotiate between inherited rhythms and accelerating national time.
