Landscape Fire, Smoke, and Health -  - E-Book

Landscape Fire, Smoke, and Health E-Book

0,0
169,99 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.
Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

A transdisciplinary approach to investigating relationships between biomass burning and human health outcomes Where and when wildfires occur, what pollutants they emit, how the chemistry of smoke changes in the atmosphere, and what impact this air pollution has on human health and well-being are questions explored across different scientific disciplines. Landscape Fire, Smoke, and Health: Linking Biomass Burning Emissions to Human Well-Being is designed to create a foundational knowledge base allowing interdisciplinary teams to interact more effectively in addressing the impacts of air pollution from biomass burning on human health. Volume highlights include: * Core concepts, principles, and terminology related to smoke and air quality used in different disciplines * Observational and modeling tools and approaches in fire science * Methods to sense, model, and map smoke in the atmosphere * Impacts of biomass burning smoke on the health and well-being of children and adults * Perspectives from researchers, modelers, and practitioners * Case studies from different countries * Information to support decision-making and policy The American Geophysical Union promotes discovery in Earth and space science for the benefit of humanity. Its publications disseminate scientific knowledge and provide resources for researchers, students, and professionals.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern

Seitenzahl: 1007

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.


Ähnliche


Table of Contents

Cover

Table of Contents

Series Page

Title Page

Copyright Page

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

PREFACE

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1 Bridging Geophysical and Health Sciences to Study the Impacts of Biomass Burning on Human Well‐Being

1.1. INTRODUCTION

1.2. CONNECTING THE MODELING CHAIN

1.3. BUILDING A SHARED LANGUAGE

1.4. STRUCTURE, SCOPE, AND AIMS

1.5. CONCLUSION

REFERENCES

Part I: From Fires to Emissions

2 Biomass Burning as an Integral Force

2.1. BIOMASS BURNING AS AN INTEGRAL FORCE AND PROCESS ON OUR LANDSCAPES

2.2. BIOMASS BURNING, WEATHER, BIOSPHERE, AND CLIMATE INTERACTIONS

2.3. STATE OF GLOBAL FIRE REGIMES

2.4. SMOKE TRANSPORT, CLOUDS, CLIMATE, AIR QUALITY (AQ), AND HEALTH

2.5. ACTIONS FOR MITIGATION: TOOLS IN THE FIRE COMMUNITY SANDBOX

2.6. CHALLENGES, CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT, AND MOVING FORWARD

2.7. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

2.8. PERTINENT AND REFERENCED WEBSITES

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

3 Mapping and Characterizing Fire

3.1. OVERVIEW OF MAPPING APPROACHES

3.2. SATELLITE‐BASED FIRE MAPPING AND CHARACTERIZATION PRINCIPLES

3.3. SATELLITE‐BASED MAPPING AND CHARACTERIZATION RESEARCH AND PRODUCTS

3.4. CAVEATS AND LIMITATIONS OF REMOTE SENSING DATA

REFERENCES

4 Wildland Fuel Characterization Across Space and Time

4.1. INTRODUCTION

4.2. WHAT ARE WILDLAND FUELS AND HOW DO THEY CONTRIBUTE TO SMOKE?

4.3. TRADITIONAL APPROACHES TO MAPPING WILDLAND FUELS FOR SMOKE MODELING AND EMISSIONS INVENTORIES

4.4. NEXT‐GENERATION WILDLAND FUEL MAPPING

4.5. RESEARCH NEEDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

4.6. CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

5 Biomass Burning Fuel Consumption and Emissions for Air Quality

5.1. INTRODUCTION

5.2. MODELING BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS

5.3. BIOMASS BURNING EMISSIONS INVENTORIES AND MAPPING SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS

5.4. APPROACHES FOR IMPROVING FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES FOR EMISSIONS INVENTORIES

5.5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

Part II: From Emissions to Concentrations

6 Surface Monitoring of Fire Pollution

6.1. INTRODUCTION

6.2. MONITORING NETWORKS

6.3. METHODS TO ESTIMATE AIR POLLUTION CONCENTRATIONS

6.4. GAPS AND CHALLENGES IN MONITORING WILDFIRE POLLUTION

6.5. OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN MONITORING WILDFIRE POLLUTION

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

7 Data Assimilation for Numerical Smoke Prediction

7.1. INTRODUCTION

7.2. MATCHING OBSERVATIONS TO FORECAST PROBLEMS

7.3. CONSIDERATIONS FOR ASSIMILATION OF SMOKE OBSERVATIONS

7.4. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

REFERENCES

8 A Review of Modeling Approaches Used to Simulate Smoke Transport and Dispersion

8.1. INTRODUCTION

8.2. SMOKE‐RELATED PROCESSES

8.3. SMOKE TRANSPORT MODELS

8.4. PLUME‐RISE MODELS

8.5. SUMMARY

8.6. FUTURE DIRECTIONS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

9 Profiles of Operational and Research Forecasting of Smoke and Air Quality Around the World

9.1. INTRODUCTION

9.2. GLOBAL SYSTEMS AND THE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE FOR AEROSOL PREDICTION (ICAP)

9.3. THE COPERNICUS ATMOSPHERE MONITORING SERVICE (CAMS): GLOBAL AND REGIONAL SYSTEMS OF EUROPE

9.4. NORTH AMERICAN SYSTEMS

9.5. SMOKE FORECASTING IN AUSTRALIA

9.6. WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION (WMO) VEGETATION FIRE AND SMOKE POLLUTION WARNING ADVISORY AND ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (VFSP‐WAS)

9.7. SUMMARY

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

DISCLAIMER

REFERENCES

Part III: From Concentrations to Health Outcomes

10 Assessing Smoke Exposure in Space and Time

10.1. FUNDAMENTALS OF SMOKE EXPOSURE ESTIMATION

10.2. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CHARACTERIZING BIOMASS BURNING SMOKE EXPOSURE

10.3. RESEARCH GAPS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

REFERENCES

11 Wildfire Smoke Toxicology and Health

11.1. INTRODUCTION TO THE BASIC ELEMENTS OF TOXICOLOGY

11.2. ROUTES OF EXPOSURE

11.3. TARGET ORGANS AND EFFECTS

11.4. MODEL SYSTEMS OF WILDFIRE SMOKE TOXICOLOGY

11.5. FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

12 Wildfire Smoke Exposures and Adult Health Outcomes

12.1. GLOBAL BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PROBLEM

12.2. OVERVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE ON ADULT HEALTH OUTCOMES

12.3. CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES

12.4. INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE THE WILDFIRE'S IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH

12.5. CONCLUSIONS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

13 Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke During Pregnancy and Childhood

13.1. INTRODUCTION

13.2. PRENATAL EXPOSURE TO WILDFIRE SMOKE AND PERINATAL OUTCOMES

13.3. EXPOSURE TO WILDFIRE SMOKE AND CHILD HEALTH OUTCOMES

13.4. RESEARCH GAPS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

14 State of the Science and Future Directions

14.1. OVERVIEW

14.2. FROM FIRE TO EMISSIONS

14.3. FROM EMISSIONS TO CONCENTRATIONS

14.4. FROM CONCENTRATIONS TO HEALTH OUTCOMES

14.5. SUMMARY

Index

End User License Agreement

List of Tables

Chapter 4

Table B4.1 Input fuel loadings (Mg/Ha)

Table B4.2 Environmental variable inputs to consume for summer wildfire and...

Chapter 5

Table 5.1 Emission Factors (EF) for the primary pollutants in biomass burni...

Table 5.2 Fire emissions modeling systems currently available showing tempo...

Chapter 6

Table 6.1 Selected Low‐Cost Air Quality Sensor (LCAQS) networks

Chapter 7

Table 7.1 Observation types and some of their relevant properties for use i...

Table 7.2 Availability of MODIS AOD for assimilation versus times/locations...

Chapter 8

Table 8.1 Commonly used smoke modeling frameworks for research and operatio...

Chapter 9

Table 9.1 Global systems included in the International Cooperative for Aero...

Table 9.2 North American smoke prediction systems

Table 9.3 Summary of the technologies and data used by the Australia AQFx A...

List of Illustrations

Chapter 2

Figure 2.1 Feedbacks between biomass burning, ecosystems, humans, weather, a...

Figure 2.2 Interaction between physical constraints and biomass burning acro...

Figure 2.3 Satellite‐derived global and regional burned area, showing a glob...

Chapter 3

Figure 3.1 Sentinel‐2 MSI L1C composite of the Soberanes Fire near Monterrey...

Figure 3.2 Illustration of the two main satellite orbit configurations: geos...

Figure 3.3 Ratio of typical fire radiance to typical daytime land surface ra...

Figure 3.4 MODIS band‐5 (diamonds) and band‐7 (plus signs) daily surface ref...

Figure 3.5 Cumulative 2019 annual burned area for Africa as mapped with NASA...

Chapter 4

Figure 4.1 Interrelated steps to estimating wildland fire emissions from bur...

Figure B4.1 Comparison of predicted PM

2.5

emissions (kg/ha) under wildfire a...

Figure 4.2 Vertical stratification of canopy fuels (>2 m aboveground fuels) ...

Figure 4.3 Representative photos of (a) flaming, (b) short‐term smoldering, ...

Figure 4.4 Conceptual diagram of mixed severity fire with a depiction of cro...

Figure 4.5 Example of a point cloud generated from terrestrial lidar scannin...

Figure 4.6 Example image of a forest understory generated from close‐range s...

Chapter 5

Figure 5.1 Two approaches to determine emissions from biomass burning. Fuel ...

Figure 5.2 Fire management records of 2014 prescribed and unintentional fire...

Figure 5.3 Figure demonstrating the variation possible of modified combustio...

Figure 5.4 Overview of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approach to ...

Chapter 6

Figure 6.1 Screen capture of the Fire and Smoke Map Web portal over Californ...

Chapter 7

Figure 7.1 Density of AOD observations at synoptic times 00Z, 06Z, 12Z, 18Z....

Figure 7.2 Latency of satellite aerosol products. Each plot shows the time g...

Figure 7.3 Latency of ground‐based data sets. These plots show the cumulativ...

Figure 7.4 Retrieval of smoke by different AOD products for 2 days in Septem...

Figure 7.5 Distribution of modeled and observed AOD values, and effects of a...

Chapter 8

Figure 8.1 A schematic of important smoke transport processes. Definitions a...

Figure 8.2 (a) STILT footprint (gray), which highlights backward trajectory ...

Figure 8.3 WRF‐SFIRE‐simulated and observed PM

2.5

concentrations for the Pol...

Figure 8.4 Plume rise simulation generated from the Freitas plume model for ...

Figure 8.5 WRF‐SFIRE simulated wildfire plume rise for the Anabella Reservoi...

Chapter 9

Figure 9.1 Mosaic of images and data products associated with 11 September 2...

Figure 9.2 (a) Intensive wildfires in Portugal in September 2020 led to incr...

Figure 9.3 Domains of the north American smoke and air quality prediction sy...

Figure 9.4 Map of Australia showing states and territories (ACT: Australian ...

Figure 9.5 (a) Forecast of near‐surface PM

2.5

for 1000 UTC 31 March 2021. Th...

Figure 9.6 Map of Tasmania. Colored regions: Coordinated Smoke Management Sy...

Figure 9.7 (a) HYSPLIT in NSW 24 hr back‐trajectories starting at 1000 29 De...

Figure 9.8 Examples of the numerical modeling forecasting products from the ...

Figure 9.9 Overview of a Vegetation Fire and Smoke Pollution Warning Advisor...

Figure 9.10 Scheme of the governance structure of a Regional Node and Fire a...

Figure 9.11 Example of Southeast Asia VFSP‐WAC multimodel ensemble median 1 ...

Figure 9.12 Near‐real‐time Southeast Asia VFSP‐WAC forecast evaluation over ...

Figure 9.13 The multimodel ensemble (MME): (a) median and (b) mean PM2.5 for...

Chapter 10

Figure 10.1 Exposure assessment is one component of environmental pollutant ...

Figure 10.2 Conceptual Framework for Exposure Assessment, which serves as a ...

Figure 10.3 Modeled daily PM

2.5

concentration from Thelen et al. (2013) illu...

Figure 10.4 Mean daily Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model‐derived...

Figure 10.5 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model‐derived mean annua...

Figure 10.6 Modeling framework (published with permission Koman et al., 2019...

Chapter 11

Figure 11.1 The respiratory system. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:...

Figure 11.2 Probability of pulmonary deposition by size fraction

Chapter 12

Figure 12.1 Aerosol Index from 10 September 2020 showing the presence of abs...

Figure 12.2 Maps comparing the number of all‐source smoke‐pollution‐health s...

Guide

Cover Page

Series Page

Title Page

Copyright Page

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

PREFACE

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Table of Contents

Begin Reading

Index

WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Pages

ii

iii

iv

vii

viii

ix

x

xi

xii

xiii

xiv

xv

xvi

xvii

xviii

xix

xx

xxi

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

193

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

Geophysical Monograph Series

231

Bioenergy and Land Use Change

Zhangcai Qin, Umakant Mishra, and Astley Hastings

(

Eds.)

231

Microstructural Geochronology: Planetary Records Down to Atom Scale

Desmond Moser, Fernando Corfu, James Darling, Steven Reddy, and Kimberly Tait (Eds.)

231

Global Flood Hazard: Applications in Modeling, Mapping and

Forecasting Guy Schumann, Paul D. Bates, Giuseppe T. Aronica, and Heiko Apel (Eds.)

231

Pre‐Earthquake Processes: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Earthquake Prediction Studies

Dimitar Ouzounov, Sergey Pulinets, Katsumi Hattori, and Patrick Taylor (Eds.)

231

Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond

Andreas Keiling, Octav Marghitu, and Michael Wheatland (Eds.)

231

Quantifying Uncertainty in Subsurface Systems

Celine Scheidt, Lewis Li, and Jef Caers (Eds.)

231

Petroleum Engineering

Moshood Sanni (Ed.)

231

Geological Carbon Storage: Subsurface Seals and Caprock Integrity

Stephanie Vialle, Jonathan Ajo‐Franklin, and J. William Carey (Eds.)

231

Lithospheric Discontinuities

Huaiyu Yuan and Barbara Romanowicz (Eds.)

231

Chemostratigraphy Across Major Chronological Eras

Alcides N.Sial, Claudio Gaucher, Muthuvairavasamy Ramkumar, and Valderez Pinto Ferreira (Eds.)

231

Mathematical Geoenergy: Discovery, Depletion, and Renewal

Paul Pukite, Dennis Coyne, and Daniel Challou (Eds.)

231

Ore Deposits: Origin, Exploration, and Exploitation

Sophie Decree and Laurence Robb (Eds.)

231

Kuroshio Current: Physical, Biogeochemical and Ecosystem Dynamics

Takeyoshi Nagai, Hiroaki Saito, Koji Suzuki, and Motomitsu Takahashi (Eds.)

231

Geomagnetically Induced Currents from the Sun to the Power Grid

Jennifer L. Gannon, Andrei Swidinsky, and Zhonghua Xu (Eds.)

231

Shale: Subsurface Science and Engineering

Thomas Dewers, Jason Heath, and Marcelo Sánchez (Eds.)

231

Submarine Landslides: Subaqueous Mass Transport Deposits From Outcrops to Seismic Profiles

Kei Ogata, Andrea Festa, and Gian Andrea Pini (Eds.)

231

Iceland: Tectonics, Volcanics, and Glacial Features

Tamie J. Jovanelly

231

Dayside Magnetosphere Interactions

Qiugang Zong, Philippe Escoubet, David Sibeck, Guan Le, and Hui Zhang (Eds.)

231

Carbon in Earth’s Interior

Craig E. Manning, Jung‐Fu Lin, and Wendy L. Mao (Eds.)

231

Nitrogen Overload: Environmental Degradation, Ramifications, and Economic Costs

Brian G. Katz

231

Biogeochemical Cycles: Ecological Drivers and Environmental Impact

Katerina Dontsova, Zsuzsanna Balogh‐Brunstad, And Gaël Le Roux (Eds.)

231

Seismoelectric Exploration: Theory, Experiments, and Applications

Niels Grobbe, André Revil, Zhenya Zhu, and Evert Slob (Eds.)

231

El Niño Southern Oscillation in a Changing Climate

Michael J. McPhaden, Agus Santoso, and Wenju Cai (Eds.)

231

Dynamic Magma Evolution

Francesco Vetere (Ed.)

231

Large Igneous Provinces: A Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes

Richard. E. Ernst, Alexander J. Dickson, and Andrey Bekker (Eds.)

231

Coastal Ecosystems in Transition: A Comparative Analysis of the Northern Adriatic and Chesapeake Bay

Thomas C. Malone, Alenka Malej, and Jadran Faganeli (Eds.)

231

Hydrogeology, Chemical Weathering, and Soil Formation

Allen Hunt, Markus Egli, and Boris Faybishenko (Eds.)

231

Solar Physics and Solar Wind

Nour E. Raouafi and Angelos Vourlidas (Eds.)

231

Magnetospheres in the Solar System

Romain Maggiolo, Nicolas André, Hiroshi Hasegawa, and Daniel T. Welling (Eds.)

231

Ionosphere Dynamics and Applications

Chaosong Huang and Gang Lu (Eds.)

231

Upper Atmosphere Dynamics and Energetics

Wenbin Wang and Yongliang Zhang (Eds.)

231

Space Weather Effects and Applications

Anthea J. Coster, Philip J. Erickson, and Louis J. Lanzerotti (Eds.)

231

Mantle Convection and Surface Expressions

Hauke Marquardt, Maxim Ballmer, Sanne Cottaar, and Jasper Konter (Eds.)

231

Crustal Magmatic System Evolution: Anatomy, Architecture, and Physico‐Chemical Processes

Matteo Masotta, Christoph Beier, and Silvio Mollo (Eds.)

231

Global Drought and Flood: Observation, Modeling, and Prediction

Huan Wu, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Qiuhong Tang, and Philip J. Ward (Eds.)

231

Magma Redox Geochemistry

Roberto Moretti and Daniel R. Neuville (Eds.)

231

Wetland Carbon and Environmental Management

Ken W. Krauss, Zhiliang Zhu, and Camille L. Stagg (Eds.)

231

Distributed Acoustic Sensing in Geophysics: Methods and Applications

Yingping Li, Martin Karrenbach, and Jonathan B. Ajo‐Franklin (Eds.)

231

Congo Basin Hydrology, Climate, and Biogeochemistry: A Foundation for the Future (English version)

Raphael M. Tshimanga, Guy D. Moukandi N’kaya, and Douglas Alsdorf (Eds.)

231

Hydrologie, climat et biogéochimie du bassin du Congo: une base pour l’avenir (version française)

Raphael M. Tshimanga, Guy D. Moukandi N’kaya, et Douglas Alsdorf (Éditeurs)

231

Muography: Exploring Earth’s Subsurface with Elementary Particles

László Oláh, Hiroyuki K. M. Tanaka, and Dezso˝ Varga (Eds.)

231

Remote Sensing of Water‐Related Hazards

Ke Zhang, Yang Hong, and Amir AghaKouchak (Eds.)

231

Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage

Lianjie Huang (Ed.)

231

Isotopic Constraints on Earth System Processes

Kenneth W. W. Sims, Kate Maher, and Daniel P. Schrag (Eds.)

231

Earth Observation Applications and Global Policy Frameworks

Argyro Kavvada, Douglas Cripe, and Lawrence Friedl (Eds.)

231

Threats to Springs in a Changing World: Science and Policies for Protection

Matthew J. Currell and Brian G. Katz (Eds.)

231

Core‐Mantle Co‐Evolution: An Interdisciplinary Approach

Takashi Nakagawa, Madhusoodhan Satish‐Kumar, Taku Tsuchiya and George Helffrich (Eds.)

231

Compressional Tectonics: Plate Convergence to Mountain Building (Tectonic Processes: A Global View, Volume 1)

Elizabeth J. Catlos and Ibrahim C¸emen (Eds.)

231

Extensional Tectonics: Continental Breakup to Formation of Oceanic Basins (Tectonic Processes: A Global View, Volume 2)

Ibrahim C¸emen and Elizabeth J. Catlos (Eds.)

231

Strike‐Slip Tectonics: Oceanic Transform Faults to Continental Plate Boundaries (Tectonic Processes: A Global View, Volume 3)

Ibrahim C¸emen and Elizabeth J. Catlos (Eds.)

231

Landscape Fire, Smoke, and Health: Linking Biomass Burning Emissions to Human Well‐Being

Tatiana V. Loboda, Nancy H. F. French, and Robin C. Puett (Eds.)

Geophysical Monograph 280

Landscape Fire, Smoke, and Health

Linking Biomass Burning Emissions to Human Well‐Being

Editors

Tatiana V. LobodaNancy H. F. FrenchRobin C. Puett

This Work is a co‐publication of the American Geophysical Union and John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

This edition first published copyright year 2024© 2024 American Geophysical Union

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

Published under the aegis of the AGU Publications Committee

Matthew Giampoala, Vice President, PublicationsCarol Frost, Chair, Publications CommitteeFor details about the American Geophysical Union visit us at www.agu.org.

The right of Tatiana V. Loboda, Nancy H. F. French, and Robin C. Puett to be identified as the editors of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.

Registered OfficeJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA

Editorial Office111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAFor details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.

Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication DataNames: Loboda, Tatiana V., editor. | French, Nancy H. F., editor. | Puett, Robin C., editor.Title: Landscape fire, smoke, and health : linking biomass burning emissions to human well‐being / editors Tatiana V. Loboda, Nancy H.F. French, Robin C. Puett.Description: Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2024. | Series: Geophysical monograph series; 280Identifiers: LCCN 2023015053 (print) | LCCN 2023015054 (ebook) | ISBN 9781119757009 (hardback) | ISBN 9781119757016 (adobe pdf) | ISBN 9781119757023 (epub)Subjects: LCSH: Particulate matter–Environmental aspects. | Smoke–Environmental aspects. | Air quality–Health aspects. | Wildfires–Health aspects. | Wildfire forecasting. | Wildfires–Simulation methods.Classification: LCC RA577.P37 F57 2024 (print) | LCC RA577.P37 (ebook) | DDC 613/.11–dc23/eng/20230710LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023015053LCebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023015054

Cover Design: WileyCover Image: Wildfire smoke east of Los Angeles, USA. © E4C/Getty Images

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

Ravan AhmadovCooperative Institute for Research in EnvironmentalSciencesUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulder, Colorado, USAandNOAA Global Systems LaboratoryBoulder, Colorado USA

Nicole AsencioMétéo‐FranceToulouse, France

Merched AzziDepartment of Planning and EnvironmentGovernment of New South WalesSydney, Australia

Alexander BaklanovWorld Meteorological OrganizationGeneva, Switzerland

Angela BenedettiEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather ForecastsReading, United Kingdom

Tarik BenmarhniaScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California San DiegoSan Diego, California, USA

Partha BhattacharjeeI. M. Systems GroupNWS/NCEP/EMCCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Allison E. BredderDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of Maryland,College Park, Maryland, USA

Melissa E. BrooksMet OfficeExeter, United Kingdom

Christopher P. CamachoNaval Research LaboratoryMarine Meteorology DivisionMonterey, California, USA

Jack ChenEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaOttawa, Ontario, Canada

Boon Ning ChewCentre for Climate Research SingaporeMeteorological Service SingaporeSingapore

Peter R. ColarcoNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbelt, Maryland, USA

Martin CopeCSIRO Climate Science CentreAspendale, Victoria, Australia

Natalie CrnosijaSchool of Public HealthUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Arlindo Da SilvaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbelt, Marlyand, USA

Didier DavignonEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaDorval, Quebec City, Canada

Savannah M. D'EvelynDepartment of Environmental and Occupational HealthSciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, Washington, USA

Evan EllicottDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Johannes FlemmingEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather ForecastsReading, United Kingdom

Nancy H. F. FrenchMichigan Tech Research InstituteMichigan Technological UniversityAnn Arbor, Michigan, USA

Christopher GanCentre for Climate Research SingaporeMeteorological Service SingaporeSingapore

Carlos Perez Garcia‐PandoBarcelona Supercomputing CenterBarcelona, Spain and Catalan Institution for Researchand Advanced StudiesBarcelona, Spain

Emily M. GargulinskiNational Institute of AerospaceHampton, Virginia, USA

Louis GiglioDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Jonathan GuthMétéo‐FranceToulouse, France

Rosie HowardEarth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences DepartmentThe University of British ColumbiaVancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Andrew T. HudakForestry Sciences LaboratoryRocky Mountain Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceMoscow, Idaho, USA

Michael L. HumberDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Edward J. HyerNaval Research LaboratoryMarine Meteorology DivisionMonterey, California, USA

John InnisEPA TasmaniaHobart, Tasmania, Australia

Eric JamesCooperative Institute for Research in EnvironmentalSciencesUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulder, Colorado, USAandNOAA Global Systems LaboratoryBoulder, Colorado, USA

Oriol JorbaBarcelona Supercomputing CenterBarcelona, Spain

Christopher O. JusticeDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Robert E. KeaneRocky Mountain Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceMissoula, Montana, USA

Zak KiplingEuropean Centre for Medium‐Range Weather ForecastsReading, United Kingdom

Adam K. KochanskiDepartment of Meteorology and Climate ScienceSan Jose State UniversitySan Jose, California, USA

Patricia D. KomanDepartment of Environmental Health SciencesUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor, Michigan, USA

Rostislav KouznetsovAtmospheric Composition UnitFinnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinki, Finland

Narasimhan K. LarkinPacific Northwest Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceSeattle, Washington, USA

Tatiana V. LobodaDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

E. Louise LoudermilkSouthern Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceAthens, Georgia, USA

Duncan LutesRocky Mountain Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceMissoula, Montana, USA

Angus MacNeilForest Practices AuthorityHobart, Tasmania, Australia

Derek V. MalliaDepartment of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City, Utah, USA

Miriam E. MarlierFielding School of Public HealthUniversity of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, California, USA

Jeffrey McQueenNOAA National Centers for Environmental PredictionCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Kerryn McTaggartDepartment of Environment, Land, Water andPlanningGovernment of VictoriaMelbourne, Victoria, Australia

Christopher MigliaccioDepartment of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical HealthSciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoula, Montana, USA

Luke MontroseSchool of Public and Population HealthBoise State UniversityBoise, Idaho, USA

M. Talat OdmanSchool of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta, Georgia, USA

Susan M. O’NeillPacific Northwest Research StationUnited States Forest ServiceSeattle, Washington, USA

Amy M. PadulaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and ReproductiveSciencesProgram for Reproductive Health and the EnvironmentUniversity of California San FranciscoSan Francisco, California, USA

Radenko PavlovicEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaDorval, Quebec City, Canada

David A. PetersonNaval Research LaboratoryMarine Meteorology DivisionMonterey, California, USA

Susan J. PrichardSchool of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, Washington, USA

Robin C. PuettInstitute for Applied Environmental HealthSchool of Public HealthUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

Camille Raynes‐GreenowSydney School of Public HealthThe University of SydneySydney, Australia

Jeffrey S. ReidUnited States Naval Research LaboratoryMarine Meteorology DivisionMonterey, California, USA

Fabienne ReisenCSIRO Climate Science CentreAspendale, Victoria, Australia

Eric RowellTall Timbers Research StationTallahassee, Florida, USA

David P. RoyDepartment of Geography, Environment and SpatialSciences, and Center for Global Change and EarthObservationsUniversity of MichiganEast Lansing, Michigan, USA

Pablo E. SaideDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,and Institute of the Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of California Los AngelesLos Angeles, California, USA

Elizabeth A. SatterfieldNaval Research LaboratoryMarine Meteorology DivisionMonterey, California, USA

Adam SchullerSchool of Public and Population HealthBoise State UniversityBoise, Idaho, USA

Mikhail SofievAtmospheric Composition UnitFinnish Meteorological InstituteHelsinki, Finland

Amber J. SojaNational Institute of AerospaceHampton, Virginia, USA and NASA Langley ResearchCenterHampton, Virginia, USA

Roland StullEarth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences DepartmentThe University of British ColumbiaVancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Taichu TanakaMeteorological Research InstituteJapan Meteorological AgencyTsukuba, Japan

Daniel TongDepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Earth SciencesGeorge Mason UniversityFairfax, Virginia, USA

Joseph K. VaughanDepartment of Civil and Environmental EngineeringWashington State UniversityPullman, Washington, USA

Alan WainAustralian Bureau of MeteorologyMelbourne, Victoria, Australia

Elizabeth B. WigginsNASA Langley Research CenterHampton, Virginia, USA

Peng XianUnited States Naval Research LaboratoryMarine Meteorology DivisionMonterey, California, USA

Maria ZubkovaDepartment of Geographical SciencesUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland, USA

PREFACE

Smoke from biomass burning is known to be a significant source of air pollution, and smoke inhalation is well understood to be detrimental to human health. Developing approaches to quantify the impacts of biomass burning smoke on health and well‐being began with the need to protect wildland firefighters and the general public from smoke. In the United States, the Forest Service initially, and the Environmental Protection Agency and National Weather Service in more recent years, developed the science, measurements and analysis frameworks for responding to the threat of air pollution coming from landscape fires. Similar agencies in other developed regions of the world, such as Canada's FireWork system and the Emergency Management Services in the European Copernicus program, provide important information for dealing with biomass burning pollution. More recently, advanced approaches using satellite‐derived information combined with in situ measurements and advanced data assimilation and analysis techniques have allowed for improved retrospective assessments of air pollution from biomass burning as well as predictions on where and when smoke can be expected to intersect with human populations.

The focus of this volume is on describing the observational and modeling approaches that are currently used in fire science, smoke characterization, and health assessment, some of which are operationally employed, while others are at the forefront of research. The concepts, analytical approaches, and models that have been developed in these disciplinary camps provide exceptional capability to answer questions and solve problems related to the topic of biomass burning smoke exposure and health. Their application now, however, is required across the broad transdisciplinary space in order to address a complex set of concerns. With the transdisciplinary reach of scientific inquiry and modeling efforts comes the necessity of building a foundational understanding of approaches, methods, and tools to craft seamless and robust chains of data analysis. This book is written by leading experts (researchers, modelers, practitioners) from several disparate disciplines who have worked across disciplines, providing synthesis of activities from an international perspective through inclusion of lead authors and coauthors from several countries outside of North America. Our diverse international and multidisciplinary community of authors and reviewers highlights the “common language” challenge faced when connecting across established divides. One clear focus of this book is on gaining an improved vocabulary and transdisciplinary knowledge‐set for considering solutions. The authors have written the text to be comprehensible to experts in the other fields of the modeling chain, with the dual aims of making a subset of this book of value to all experts currently working in this domain, as well as making all components of this book of value to newcomers to the field. Scientific discovery and technological development often outpace scientific publishing and, thus, books focused exclusively on cutting edge knowledge tend to become outdated before they come out of print. For this book, we include information that will provide the scaffolding for accelerated scientific growth.

The book is simplistically structured to cover a broad set of related topics, presented to be accessible outside of an expert's basic knowledge field, and provides foundational concepts along with new research and applications. The book is divided into three parts, which broadly address fire science (Part I: From Fires to Emissions), atmospheric chemistry and dynamics (Part II: From Emissions to Concentrations), and human health research (Part III: From Concentrations to Health Outcomes). Each part contains four chapters, which are designed to cover the foundational knowledge within the field; highlight recent advancements; describe commonly used methods; and outline existing data sets, models, or systems in general use by the respective communities. The three parts of this volume represent three distinct research communities, with members who are often focused on topics adjacent to the topics of fire, smoke, and health. Included are in‐depth reviews of the state of the art within each topic aimed at understanding health outcomes of biomass burning emissions (smoke).

Since the AGU’s Fall Meeting in 2019 when we first convened a session related to health outcomes of biomass burning emissions, we have evidenced the widespread attention and the rapidly growing interest in this subject among the scientists, resource managers, and public health practitioners. However, it also became clear that the community was largely involved in advancing the science within its disciplinary camps with limited communication and collaboration among scientists involved across various components of the modeling chain (starting with fire detection, through emissions modeling, atmospheric transport, and constructing epidemiological models of health outcomes). As a result, researchers along the modeling chain have struggled to identify and incorporate the most appropriate developments from adjacent disciplinary links into developing their methodologies. Moreover, the rapid proliferation of methods for each of these components has also created challenges evaluating the validity and linkages among reported results leading to opaque science. In this book, we attempt to synthesize and harmonize foundational as well as state‐of‐the‐art information across all components of the modeling chain and to build a common language to advance transdisciplinary work. While far from comprehensive, the primary aim of this book is to build a collaborative community with a common understanding and to promote further scientific inquiry and applied approaches.

A book like this, with a diverse set of authors and broad audience, takes dedication and patience from the people involved. We would first like to acknowledge the effort that each of our chapter lead authors and coauthors put into writing excellent and valuable material that makes up the bulk of this volume. In addition to thanking these dedicated authors, we thank Jenny Lunn at AGU, Geeta Persad from the AGU Books Editorial Board, and the production team at Wiley including Keerthana Govindarajan, Noel McGlinchey, Rituparna Bose, and Lesley Fenske. They have been quite gracious in guiding us along the path to completion. Also, in the background making sure materials flowed efficiently was Julie Carter, who read each chapter draft for consistency, a task of great value and payoff for making a good product. In addition, the quality of the work is due in large part to the set of reviewers who graciously provided their time and expertise to critiquing each chapter. A full‐fledged peer review takes time and effort on the part of many people. Finally, a thank you to the AGU Geohealth Section leaders, session organizers over the past three years, and section members for encouraging us to take on this project. The AGU embraces the philosophy of diversity of thought and development of transdisciplinary bridges. The Geohealth Section, in particular, has shown the way to improving health and well‐being with this approach.

Tatiana V. Loboda

University of Maryland, USA

Nancy H. F. French

Michigan Technological University, USA

Robin C. Puett

University of Maryland, USA

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Acronym

Description

Chapter

AATSR

Advanced Along‐Track Scanning Radiometer

3

ABI

Advanced Baseline Imager

3

ACCESS

Australian Community Climate and Earth‐System Simulator

9

ACCP

Aerosol and Cloud Convection and Precipitation

2

ADME

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion

11

ADRD

Alzheimer’s Disease Related Dementias

12

AERONET

Aerosol Robotic Network

7

AFAC

Australian National Council for Fire and Emergency Services

2

AFDRS

Australian Fire Danger Rating System

9

AFIS

Advanced Fire Information System

2

AHI

Advanced Himawari Imager

3

AhR

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor

11

AIRPACT

Air Indicator Report for Public Awareness and Community Tracking

8

ALS

Airborne Light detection and range Scanning

4

AMS

Autonomous Modular Sensor

3

AOD

Aerosol Optical Depth

6

AOS

Atmosphere Observing System

2

API

Application Programming Interface

6

AQ

Air Quality

6

AQFx

Air Quality Forecasting

9

AQHI

Air Quality Health Index

9

AQI

Air Quality Index

11

ARI

Acute Respiratory Illness

11

ASEAN

Association of Southeast Asian Nations

9

ASMC

ASEAN Specialized Meteorological Centre

9

ATS

American Thoracic Society

10

ATSR‐2

Along‐Track Scanning Radiometer 2

3

AVHRR

Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer

3

BAER

Burned Area Emergency Response

2

BB

Biomass Burning

9

BC

Black Carbon

9

BEIS

Biogenic Emission Inventory System

9

BLANkET 

Base‐Line Air Network of EPA Tasmania

9

BMI

Body Mass Index

13

BOM

Bureau of Meteorology (Australia)

9

BSC

BlueSky Canada

9

BSC‐S

Barcelona Supercomputing Center (Spain)

9

CAAQMS

Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations

6

CALIOP

Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization

7

CALIPSO

Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations

2

CAMS

Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service

9

CANSAC

California and Nevada Smoke and Air Committee

9

CAP

Criteria Air Pollutants

5

CASTNet

Clean Air Status and Trends Network

6

CAWFE

Coupled Atmosphere‐Wildland Fire Environment

2

CCI

Climate Change Initiative

3

CDF

Cumulative Distribution Function

7

CEOS

Committee on Earth Observation Satellites

2

CFD

Computational Fluid Dynamics

4

CFFEPS

Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System

9

CH4

Methane

5

CI

Confidence Interval

13

CMAQ

Community Multiscale Air Quality

10

CNEMC

China National Environmental Monitoring Center

6

CNES

Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (France)

2

CO

Carbon Monoxide

5

CO2

Carbon Dioxide

5

COHb

Carboxyhemoglobin

11

CONAFOR

Comisión Nacional Forestal (Mexico)

2

CONUS

Continental United States

7

COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

10

CRF

Concentration‐Response Functions

12

CrIS

Cross‐Track Infrared Spectrometer

7

CSA

Canadian Space Agency

2

C‐SEM

CSIRO Smoke Emissions Model

9

CSIRO

Commonwealth Science and Industrial Organization (Australia)

9

CSMS

Coordinated Smoke Management System

9

CTM

Chemical Transport Model

10

CWD

Coarse Woody Debris

4

CWFIS

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System

2

DEASCO3

Deterministic and Empirical Assessment of Smoke's Contribution to Ozone Project

9

DEHM

Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model

9

DELWP

Department of Environment, Land, Water, and Planning (Victoria, Australia)

9

DEP

Diesel Exhaust Particulate

11

DMSP

Defense Meteorological Satellite Program

3

DOI

Department of the Interior (United States)

2

DPIE

Department of Planning, Industry, and the Environment (New South Wales, Australia)

9

DRI

Desert Research Institute

9

DTM

Digital Terrain Models

5

ECCC

Environment and Climate Change Canada

9

ECMWF

European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts

9

EEA

European Environment Agency

5

EF

Emission Factor

5

EFFIS

European Forest Fire Information System

2

EJScreen

Environmental Justice Screening

2

EMEP

European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme

5

ENEA

Energia Nucleare ed Energie Alternative (Italy)

9

ENVISAT

Environmental Satellite

3

EOS

Earth Observing System

3

EOSDIS

Earth Observing System Data and Information System

2

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

2

ERS‐2

European Remote Sensing 2

3

ETM

Enhanced Thematic Mapper

3

EU

European Union

5

EURAD‐IM

EURopean Air pollution Dispersion‐Inverse Model

9

EVT

Existing Vegetation Type

5

EWS

Early Warning Systems

12

FASMEE

Fire and Smoke Model Evaluation Experiment

2

FBP

Fire Behavior Prediction

9

FCCS

Fuel Characteristic Classification System

5

FEER

Fire Energetics and Emissions Research

5

FEMA

Federal Emergency Management Agency (United States)

2

FEPS

Fire Emission Production Simulator

10

FFDI

Forest Fire Danger Index

9

FINN

Fire INventory from NCAR

8

FireMARS

Fire Monitoring Accounting and Reporting System

2

FIREX‐AQ

Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality

2

FIRMS

Fire Information for Resource Management System

2

FIS

Fire Information System

9

FLAMBE

Fire Locating and Modeling of Burning Emissions

9

FLEXPART

Flexible Particle dispersion model

8

FMI

Finnish Meteorological Institute

9

FNMOC

Fleet Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center

9

FOFEM

First Order Fire Effects Model

5

FPA

Forest Practices Authority (Tasmania, Australia)

9

FRE

Fire Radiative Energy

3

FRM

Federal Reference Method

10

FRP

Fire Radiative Power

3

FT

Free Troposphere

8

FWI

Fire Weather Index

9

GA

Gaussian Anamorphosis

7

GAFIS

Global Air Quality Forecasting and Information System

9

GAM

Generalized Additive Model

6

GBA

Global Burnt Area

3

GBBEP‐Geo

Global Biomass Burning Emission Product from Geostationary Satellites

5

GBBEPx

blended Global Biomass Burning Emissions Product

9

GDPFS

Global Data‐Processing and Forecasting System

9

GEDI

Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation

5

GEFS

Global Ensemble Forecast System

9

GEM

Global Environmental Model

9

GEMS

Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer

2

GEOS

Goddard Earth Observing System

9

GEOS‐Chem

Goddard Earth Observing System with Chemistry

2

GFAS

Global Fire Assimilation System

5

GFED

Global Fire Emissions Database

5

GFMC

Global Fire Monitoring Center

2

GFS

Global Forecast System

8

GFWED

Global Fire Weather Database

2

GHG

Greenhouse Gases

5

GMS

Geostationary Meteorological Satellites

2

GOES

Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite

2

GOFC‐GOLD

Global Observation of Forest Cover ‐ Global Observation of Land Dynamics

2

GPS

Global Positioning Systems

10

GSL

NOAA Global Systems Laboratory (United States)

9

GTOS

Global Terrestrial Observing System

2

GWIS

Global Wildfire Information System

2

GWR

Geographically Weighted Regression

6

HAPs

Hazardous Air Pollutants

12

HAQAST

Health and Air Quality Applied Sciences Team

2

HMS

Hazard Mapping System

2

HONO

Nitrous Acid

8

HRRR

High Resolution Rapid Refresh

9

HRRR‐Smoke

High Resolution Rapid Refresh Model with Smoke

8

HYSPLIT

Hybrid Single‐Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory Model

8

IASI

Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer

7

IAWF

International Association of Wildland Fire

2

ICAP‐MME

International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction Multi‐Model‐Ensemble

9

ICESat‐2

Ice Cloud And Land Elevation Satellite

5

IDEQ

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (United States)

9

IDW

Inverse Distance Weighting

6

IEK

Institute of Energy and Climate Research (Germany)

9

IEP‐NRI

Institute of Environmental Protection – National Research Institute (Poland)

9

IMPROVE

Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment (United States)

6

INERIS

Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (France)

9

INPE

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (Brazil)

2

IPCC

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

5

IS4FIRES

Integrated Monitoring and Modeling System (IS) for wildland fires

9

ISA

Integrated Science Assessment

10

ISRO

Indian Space Research Organization

2

IWFAQRP

Interagency Wildland Fire Air Quality Response Program

9

JAXA

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

2

JFSP

Joint Fire Science Program (United States)

2

JMA

Japan Meteorological Agency

3

JPSS

Joint Polar Satellite System

2

KNMI

Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

9

LANCE

Land, Atmosphere Near‐real‐time Capability for EOS

3

LAR

Laboratory for Atmospheric Research

9

LCAQS

Low‐Cost Air Quality Sensors

6

LPDMs

Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Models

8

LRTAP

Long‐Range Transboundary Air Pollution

5

LUR

Land Use Regression

6

LWIR

Long Wavelength Infrared

3

MAIA

Multi‐Angle Imager for Aerosols

2

MAIAC

Multi‐Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction

7

MASINGAR

Model of Aerosol Species in the Global Atmosphere

9

MCE

Modified Combustion Efficiency

5

MEGAN

Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature

9

MERIS

Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer

3

MFLEI

Missoula Fire Laboratory Emission Inventory

8

MINNI

Italian National Integrated Assessment Model

9

MISR

Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer

2

MODIS

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

3

MONARCH

Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model

9

MONCAGE

Météo France Modèle de Chimie Atmospherique à Grande Echelle

9

MOPITT

Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere

7

MOVES

EPA MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator (United States)

9

MOZART

Model of Ozone and Related Chemical Tracers

8

MPLNet

Micropulse Lidar Network

7

MSC

Meteorological Service of Canada

9

MSI

MultiSpectral Instrument

3

MSS

Multispectral Scanner System

3

MSS‐S

Meteorological Service Singapore

9

MSS‐UKMO NAME

MSS‐United Kingdom Meteorological Office Numerical Atmospheric‐dispersion Modeling Environment

9

MWIR

Medium Wavelength InfraRed

3

NAAPS

Navy Aerosol Analysis and Prediction System (United States)

7

NAAQMN

National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network (United States)

6

NAAQS

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (United States)

10

NAM

North American Mesoscale Forecast System

8

NAPS

National Air Pollution Surveillance (Canada)

6

NAQFC

National Air Quality Forecast Capability (United States)

9

NASA

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (United States)

2

NCAP

National Clean Air Program (India)

6

NCAR

National Center for Atmospheric Research

8

NEI

National Emissions Inventory (United States)

5

NEPMs

National Environment Protection Measures (Australia)

6

NESDIS

National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (United States)

12

NFPA

National Fire Protection Association

2

NH

3

Ammonia

5

NICC

National Interagency Coordination Center (United States)

2

NIFC

National Interagency Fire Center (United States)

2

NIROPS

National Infrared Operations (United States)

3

NISAR

NASA‐ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar

2

NO

Nitrogen Monoxide

5

NO

2

Nitrogen Dioxide

5

NOAA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (United States)

2

NOx

Nitrogen Oxides

10

NRC

National Research Council (United States)

10

NRCan

National Resources Canada

9

NRL

Naval Research Laboratory (United States)

9

NW‐AIRQUEST

Northwest International Air Quality Environmental Science and Technology

9

NWCG

National Wildfire Coordination Group (United States)

2

NWP

Numerical Weather Prediction

9

NWS

National Weather Service (United States)

2

O

2

Molecular Oxygen

8

O

3

Ozone

5

OC

Organic Carbon

9

OLCI

Ocean and Land Color Instrument

3

OLI

Operational Land Imager

3

OLS

Operational Linescan System

3

OM

Organic Matter

9

OMI

Ozone Monitoring Instrument

7

OMPS

Ozone Mapping Profiler Suite

7

OR

Odds Ratio

13

PAHs

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

11

PBL

Planetary Boundary Layer

8

PDF

Probability Distribution Function

7

PM

Particulate Matter

5

PM

10

Particulate Matter with a diameter of 10 μ m or less

7

PM

2.5

Particulate Matter with a diameter of 2.5 μ m or less

7

PMAp

Polar Multisensor Aerosol product

9

POLDER

Polarization and Directionality of the Earth's Reflectances

7

PPE

Personal Protective Equipment

10

PRH

Pseudo Relative Humidity

7

PTSD

Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder

10

pyroCb

Pyrocumulonimbus

8

pyroCu

Pyrocumulus

8

QFED

Quick Fire Emissions Data set

9

RAP

Rapid Refresh

9

RAQDPS‐FW

Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System with near‐real‐time wild Fire Emissions

9

RF

Random Forest

6

RR

Relative Risk

13

RSMC

Regional Specialized Meteorological Centers (WMO)

9

SAR

Synthetic Aperture Radar

3

SASEM

Simple Approach Smoke Estimation Model

8

SBG

Surface Biology and Geology

2

SDS‐WAS

Sand and Dust Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System

9

SERA

Smoke Emissions Repository Application

5

SEVIRI

Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager

3

SfM

Structure‐from‐Motion

4

SILAM

System for Integrated modeling of Atmospheric coMposition

9

SLSTR

Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer

3

SMARTFIRE v2 (SF2)

Satellite Mapping Automated Reanalysis Tool for Fire Incident Reconciliation

9

SMHI

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute

9

SMOKE

Sparse Matrix Operator Kernal Emissions

8

S‐NPP

Suomi National Polar‐orbiting Partnership (United States)

3

SO2

Sulfur Dioxide

5

SOA

Secondary Organic Aerosols

8

SPOT

Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre

3

STILT

Stochastic Time‐Inverted Lagrangian Transport

8

SWIR

Short Wavelength InfraRed

3

TEMPO

Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution

2

3D

Three Dimensional

4

TIROS‐N

Television Infrared Observation Satellite ‐ Next generation

3

TLS

Terrestrial Light detection and range Scanning

4

TM

Thematic Mapper

3

TNO

The Netherlands Organization for applied scientific research

9

TPM

Total Particulate Matter

5

TRAP

Traffic‐Related Air Pollution

11

TRMM

Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission

3

TROPOMI

Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument

7

TRP

Transient Receptor Potential

11

TSP

Total Suspended Particles

5

UAS

Uncrewed Airborne Systems

3

UKMO

UK Met Office

9

UNECE

United Nations Economic Commission For Europe

5

UNFCCC

United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change

5

USDA

United States Department of Agriculture

9

USFS

United States Forest Service

8

USGS

United States Geological Survey

2

VACES

Versatile Aerosol Concentration Enrichment System

11

VAQUM

Verification of Air QUality Models (ECCC)

9

VAS

Visible Infrared Spin Scan Radiometer

3

VFSP‐WAC

Regional VFSP‐WAS Centers

9

VFSP‐WAS

Vegetation Fire and Smoke Pollution Warning Advisory and Assessment System

9

VIIRS

Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite

3

VIRS

Visible and Infrared Scanner

3

VOC

Volatile Organic Compounds

9

WACCM

Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model

9

WFAS

Wildland Fire Assessment System

2

WFDS

Wildland‐urban interface Fire Dynamics Simulator

8

WFEI

Wildland Fire Emissions Inventory

5

WFEIS

Wildland Fire Emissions Inventory System

5

WFRT

Weather Forecast Research Team

9

WHO

World Health Organization

2

WIMS

Weather Information Management System

10

WMO

World Meteorological Organization

9

WRAP

Western Regional Air Partnership (United States)

9

WRF

Weather Research and Forecasting model

2

WRF‐Chem

Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry

8

WRF‐SFIRE

Weather Research and Forecasting model with Sfire Fire Spread Model

8

1Bridging Geophysical and Health Sciences to Study the Impacts of Biomass Burning on Human Well‐Being

Tatiana V. Loboda1, Nancy H. F. French2, and Robin C. Puett3

1 Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

2 Michigan Tech Research Institute, Michigan Technological University, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

3 Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

ABSTRACT

Biomass burning in natural and management fires is a known source of air pollution that impacts millions of people worldwide. However, quantifying this impact and establishing definitive linkages between fire smoke and adverse health effects is a highly complex problem, which requires collaborative work between researchers across numerous disciplines within geophysical and health sciences. This chapter introduces the framework for this book and how we lay out the components of modeling chain from fire through smoke transport to health outcomes. Most of the concepts and models used in this modeling chain have been developed within disciplinary camps but are applied within a broad transdisciplinary research space. Our primary goal for this monograph is to build the foundation of common understanding of the entire process for nonspecialists in the field. And to achieve that, we aim to create a shared language, which interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary, and multidisciplinary teams of investigators might use to make their research efforts more robust and accelerate the pace of new knowledge development.

1.1. INTRODUCTION

Fire has been a part of the Earth system for at least 420 million years (Glasspool et al., 2004). Ever since levels of atmospheric oxygen produced by terrestrial vegetation rose enough to sustain fire propagation, burning of vegetation (biomass), ignited mostly by lightning strikes and volcanic activity, became an integral part of many global land ecosystems. Humankind evolved alongside naturally occurring fires to eventually develop masterful and extensive techniques of fire management for its benefit. The importance of fire to the development of our species and the societal evolution can hardly be overstated (Gowlett, 2016). Although over time, industrial and, in some parts of the world, domestic use of fire shifted toward other sources of fuel (e.g., coal, oil, and gas), to‐date anthropogenic use of fire (biomass burning) continues to present a critical part of life and well‐being for people worldwide, a robust landscape management tool, and a potent weapon (Bowman et al., 2011). As anthropogenic use of biomass burning has expanded, humanity's tolerance of naturally occurring fires dwindled, which led to the development of policies and practices in some countries, mostly notably the United States, aimed at near‐complete fire suppression about a century ago (Forest History Society, n.d.). The subsequent shift in recent decades toward more severe fires, and a broad appreciation of the value of natural fire to ecosystem health, slowly brought about a more nuanced perspective, one that acknowledges fire's benefits within the framework of an adaptive resilience approach (Schoennagel et al., 2017). The perception and acceptance of wildfire, however, have ebbed again as the large number of extreme fire events swept across North America, Southern Europe, Australia, and Northern Eurasia over the last decade. Brought on by the combined impacts of climate (Flannigan et al., 2013) and extensive land‐use change (Archibald et al., 2009; Doerr & Santín, 2016), these events have raised concern among policy makers and the general public about the threat to life and economic damage caused by uncontrolled fires. These concerns have grown larger as evidence of negative health outcomes associated with fire‐produced air pollutants began to emerge in recent decades.

1.2. CONNECTING THE MODELING CHAIN

Although the number of articles in the scientific literature that examine linkages between air pollution resultant from biomass burning and human health and well‐being continues to grow exponentially, this branch of scientific inquiry is still in its infancy partly owing to the complexity of the processes that necessitate a close collaboration between several branches of geophysics and public health fields. The process of establishing and quantifying causal relationships between biomass burning and health outcomes is extremely challenging and requires input from a large number of different experts. Where and when did the fire happen? What was burned and how much? How many pollutants were produced and what kind? How long did they remain the air and how far did they travel? How did they change while they were transported? Who inhaled them and how much? What effect on human bodies do they have? What polices, resources, and intervention strategies are needed to support well‐being and resilience to biomass burning? The scope of the inquiry brings together experts in fire ecology, satellite remote sensing, forestry and natural resource management, atmospheric chemistry, atmospheric dynamics, space‐time modeling, environmental epidemiology, toxicology, and public health.

The focus of this volume is on describing the observational and modeling approaches that are currently used in fire science, smoke characterization, and health assessment related to biomass burning smoke. The concepts and models that have been developed in these disciplinary camps provide exceptional capability to answer questions and solve problems related to the topic of biomass burning smoke exposure and health. However, their application now is required across the broad transdisciplinary space in order to address a complex set of concerns. And with the transdisciplinary reach of scientific inquiry and modeling efforts comes the necessity of building a foundational understanding of approaches, methods, and tools to craft seamless and robust chains of data analysis. While this foundational understanding is not a substitute for expert knowledge, it will help ensure that the data flow along the modeling chain is not controlled by asking “what we can do” or “what we have always done” in typical siloed approaches but begins solving the more complex interdisciplinary questions of “where are the gaps” and “what and who are needed to fill these gaps”. Understanding the fundamental concepts and the limitations of the modeling chain segments will allow research teams to fine‐tune their methodological approach at an early stage of inquiry and make research efforts more robust.

1.3. BUILDING A SHARED LANGUAGE

Our diverse international and interdisciplinary community of authors and reviewers highlights the “common language” challenge faced when connecting across established divides. One clear purpose of this book is focused on gaining an improved vocabulary and transdisciplinary knowledge set for considering solutions, which include mitigation actions and adaptive strategies, for avoiding adverse outcomes from biomass burning smoke exposure. The word fire is an incredibly commonplace and yet very complicated term. In the Glossary of Wildfire Terminology (National Wildfire Coordinating Group, 2021), fire is defined as “rapid oxidation, usually with the evolution of heat and light” and while it is technically our subject, the definition is substantially broader than the focus of this book. Here we focus on fires of both natural and anthropogenic origin, intended and unplanned but only those that consume alive and dead plant matter or biomass and occur on the landscape. We thus refer to fire here as “biomass burning,” a term that incorporates events that can be found in the literature as wildland fire, wildfire, bushfire, grassland fire, peat fire, forest fire, crop residue fire, prescribed fire, management fire, or landscape fire, among other terms. While it does capture the absolute majority of potential instances of fire on the land, there are some very important types of fire that we are not considering here. Those include structural fires, trash fires, fossil fuel burning, and any other types of burning of human‐made or nonbiomass materials as well as wood‐burning for heating and indoor or outdoor cooking. Although all those instances also represent sources of air pollution and richly deserve an in‐depth assessment, they are not considered here.

With the widely anticipated increase in biomass‐burning driven air pollution during the 21st century (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019), capacity building in assessing the health burden and projecting health outcomes of air pollution arising from biomass burning (natural or anthropogenic) has become not only necessary but also urgent. It takes decades of study and practice to develop sufficient expertise in subfields of each of these broader disciplines. Meanwhile, an interdisciplinary team looking at this subject needs to have basic understanding of fundamental components of the complex process, a scientific equivalent of a common language, to be able to ask the right questions and collaborate effectively or, in the now famous words of Steven Pinker, to connect “the members of a community into an information sharing network with formidable collective powers” (Pinker, 1995, pp. 2–3). Traditionally, successful interdisciplinary teams undergo a multiyear multiproject coevolution where the team members learn these fundamentals through frequent interactions and continuous exposure to ideas and expertise of their collaborators. However, as scientists are challenged with addressing complex and pressing societal issues, streamlining the knowledge base for this subject will pave the way for accelerated interdisciplinary team building.

1.4. STRUCTURE, SCOPE, AND AIMS

In this book we aim to create a foundational knowledge base across a suite of disciplines, which will enable interdisciplinary teams to interact more effectively in addressing impacts of biomass burning air pollution on human health. The book is divided into three sections, which broadly address fire science (Part I: From Fire to Emissions), atmospheric chemistry and dynamics (Part II: From Emissions to Concentrations), and human health research (Part III: From Concentrations to Health Outcomes). Each section contains four chapters, which are designed to cover the foundational knowledge within the field, highlight recent advancements, describe commonly used methods, and outline existing data sets, models, or systems in general use by the respective communities. The three sections of this volume represent three distinct research communities, with members who are often focused on topics adjacent to the topics of fire, smoke, and health. In addition to what is presented here, many other aspects of the broad topic include improvements in geophysical data collection and analysis, predictive and retrospective modeling and data assimilation, as well as socioeconomic aspects of dealing with existing and future biomass burning smoke events. As noted, this is a global problem with far‐reaching implications for human health. The chapters here are meant to provide some of the knowledge base for seeding further exploration by the international interdisciplinary community.