173,99 €
MICROGRIDS for COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS This distinct volume provides detailed information on the concepts and applications of the emerging field of microgrids for commercial applications, offering solutions in the design, installation, and operation of this new, cutting-edge technology. The microgrid is defined as Distributed Energy Resources (DER) and interconnected loads with clearly defined electrical boundaries that act as a single controllable entity concerning the grid as per IEEE standard 2030.7-2017. It provides an uninterrupted power supply to end-user loads with high reliability. Commercial systems like IT/ITES, shopping complexes, malls, the banking sector, hospitals, etc., need an uninterrupted input power supply with high reliability. Microgrids are more suitable for commercial systems to service their clients with no service discontinuity. The microgrid enables both connection and disconnection from the grid. That is, the microgrid can operate both in grid-connected and islanded modes of operation. The microgrid controller plays an important role in microgrid systems. It shall have an energy management system and real-time control functions that operate in the following conditions: both grid-connected and islanded modes of operation, automatic transfer from grid-connected mode to islanding mode, reconnection and re-synchronization from islanded mode to grid-connected mode, optimization of both real and reactive power generation and consumption by the energy management system, grid support, ancillary services, etc. Whenever a microgrid is in islanded mode, it will work as an autonomous system without a distribution grid power supply. In this mode of operation, fault in the transmission or distribution grid will not propagate into the microgrid. Whenever a microgrid operates in grid-connected mode, power flows bi-directionally between the distribution grid and microgrid at the point of interconnection. Hence, microgrids ensure the interrupted power supply to the end-user loads with high reliability. This book aims to bring together the design, installation, operation, and new research that has been carried out in the field of microgrid applications for commercial power systems.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 630
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024
Cover
Table of Contents
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Acknowledgements
1 Smart Energy Source Management in a Commercial Building Microgrid
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Motivations of the Study
1.3 State of the Art of the System
1.4 Overview of the Proposed Methodology
1.5 DSM Approach
1.6 Background for HOMER Simulation
1.7 Conclusion
References
2 Renewable Power Generation Price Prediction and Forecasting Using Machine Learning
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Literature Review
2.3 Data Mining Models
2.4 Objectives
2.5 Conclusions
References
3 Energy Storage System for Microgrid for Commercial Systems
3.1 Introduction
3.2 State of the Art
3.3 Energy Storage Systems
3.4 Batteries for Microgrids in Commercial Applications
3.5 Future Trends
3.6 Summary
References
4 Emerging Topologies of DC–DC Converters for Microgrid Applications
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Microgrid
4.3 DC–DC Converter Topologies
4.4 Modulation of DC–DC Converters With Different Control Strategies
4.5 Comparative Analysis
4.6 Conclusion
Appendix
References
5 Analysis of PWM Techniques on Multiphase Multilevel Inverter for PV Applications in Microgrids
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Cascaded H-Bridge Multiphase Multilevel Inverter
5.3 Modulation Techniques for Multilevel Inverter
5.4 Simulation Results
5.5 Conclusion
References
6 Mathematical Modeling and Analysis of Solar PV–Electrolyzer–Fuel Cell‑Based Power Generation System
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Hybrid Renewable Energy Storage System
6.3 Modeling of the Hybrid Renewable Energy Storage System
6.4 Characteristic Study of Each Component of the Hybrid Renewable Energy Storage System
6.5 Energy Management System
6.6 Result and Discussion
6.7 Summary and Future Scope
References
7 Design of DC EV Charging Infrastructure in a Commercial Building Using the Solar PV System
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Methodological Analysis
7.3 Result Analysis
7.4 Conclusion
References
8 Design and Simulation of a Rooftop Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Power System for an Academic Institution
8.1 Introduction
8.2 System Design
8.3 Design Methodology
8.4 Conclusion
References
9 Integration of Wind Energy Control with Electric Vehicle
9.1 Introduction
9.2 PID Controller
9.3 Wind Power System Dynamics
9.4 PID Control in Frequency Regulation
9.5 Integrating Wind Power Systems into EV
9.6 Conclusion
References
10 Interactive Use of D-STATCOM and Storage Resource to Maintain Microgrid Stability for Commercial Systems
10.1 Introduction
10.2 The Proposed Structure
10.3 Simulation
10.4 Conclusion
References
11 Power System Studies for Microgrids
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Description of a Microgrid Model Operating in Islanded Mode
11.3 Harmonic Load Flow Analysis in Islanded Mode
11.4 Transient Analysis of a Microgrid System in Islanded Mode
11.5 Load Flow Analysis of a Microgrid Operating in Grid-Tied Mode
11.6 Transient Analysis of Microgrid System in Grid-Tied Mode
11.7 Comparative Analysis of a Microgrid Operating in Islanded and Grid-Tied Mode
11.8 Conclusion
References
12 EV Charging Infrastructure in Microgrid
12.1 Introduction
12.2 An Overview of EV Charging Infrastructure
12.3 Importance of Charging Station and Charge Point
12.4 EV Integration to the Microgrid
12.5 Industrial Microgrid and Subsystem
12.6 Summary
References
13 Operation and Control of EV Infrastructure for Microgrid
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Proposed Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure for Enhancing Microgrid Operation
13.3 Implementation of Proposed Commercial EV Charging Stations on Microgrids
13.4 Validation of the Proposed Commercial EV Charging Stations on Microgrids
13.5 Conclusion
References
14 Renewable-Energy-Powered EV Charging Station for Microgrid PSO-Based Controller for PV-Powered EV Charging Station
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Renewable-Energy-Powered EV Charging Station for Microgrid
14.3 EV Charging Station
14.4 System Description
14.5 Proposed PSO Optimized IC MPPT Algorithm
14.6 Case Study—MATLAB Simulation
14.7 Conclusion
References
Appendix
15 Closed-Loop Control of Microgrids With Wind and Battery Storage System in Islanding Mode
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Wind Turbine Modeling
15.3 Designing a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator
15.4 Three-Phase Rectifier
15.5 Modeling of a Boost Converter With MPPT
15.6 Battery Energy Storage System
15.7 Modeling of Lithium-Ion Battery
15.8 Modeling of a Bidirectional DC–DC Converter
15.9 Modeling a Three-Phase Voltage Source Inverter
15.10 Vector Control Structure for Inverter Control
15.11 Modeling a Passive Filter
15.12 Simulation Results
15.13 Conclusion
References
Index
Also of Interest
End User License Agreement
Chapter 1
Table 1.1 Categorization of loads.
Table 1.2 Distinguished time slots.
Table 1.3 Economical inputs.
Table 1.4 HOMER simulation configurations before and after DSM.
Table 1.5 Comparative result analysis.
Table 1.6 Comparative cost analysis.
Chapter 2
Table 2.1 Comparative analysis for the four seasons in the Indian market.
Table 2.2 Daily MAPE results in percentage for the period June 16–30, 2019.
Chapter 4
Table 4.1 Comparative configuration analysis of unidirectional resonant DC–DC ...
Table 4.2 Comparative operational analysis of unidirectional resonant DC–DC co...
Table 4.3 Comparative configuration analysis of bidirectional isolated DC–DC c...
Table 4.4 Comparative operational analysis of bidirectional isolated DC–DC con...
Table 4.5 Comparative configuration analysis of bidirectional non-isolated DC–...
Table 4.6 Comparative operational analysis of bidirectional non-isolated DC–DC...
Table 4.7 Comparative analysis of the overall configuration of unidirectional ...
Table 4.8 Comparative analysis on the overall configuration of bidirectional i...
Table 4.9 Comparative analysis of overall configuration of bidirectional non-i...
Chapter 5
Table 5.1 Switching sequence for five-level CHB MLI per phase.
Table 5.2 Simulation parameters.
Table 5.3 THD and RMS value comparison for the phase and line voltages of a fi...
Table 5.4 THD and RMS value comparison for the phase and line voltages of a si...
Table 5.5 THD and RMS value comparison for the phase and line voltages of a se...
Chapter 6
Table 6.1 Various output values for the change in the irradiance level of the ...
Chapter 7
Table 7.1 List of the arrival of vehicles in a day.
Table 7.2 Characteristics of various types of electric vehicles.
Table 7.3 Equipment specifications and ratings for the proposed microgrid desi...
Table 7.4 Cost comparison analysis for base case and winning system using HOME...
Table 7.5 Comparison analysis for the base case and the winning case of grid....
Table 7.6 Proposed EV microgrid design emission levels.
Chapter 8
Table 8.1 Daily load estimation table for the ECE department.
Chapter 10
Table 10.1 Data of available resources in the microgrid.
Table 10.2 Microgrid consumer data.
Table 10.3 Conditions of the microgrid lines.
Chapter 11
Table 11.1 Voltage alert levels.
Table 11.2 Load flow report operating scenario 1 in islanded mode.
Table 11.3 Load flow report operating scenario 2 in islanded mode.
Table 11.4 Voltage harmonics bus information in islanded mode.
Table 11.5 Current harmonics bus information in islanded mode.
Table 11.6 Bus voltage during line-to-ground fault.
Table 11.7 Bus current during line-to-ground fault.
Table 11.8 Bus voltage and current during the three-phase fault.
Table 11.9 Bus voltage during line-to-ground fault at bus 3.
Table 11.10 Bus current during LG fault at bus 3.
Table 11.11 Load flow report during loss of PV 1 unit in islanded mode.
Table 11.12 Load flow table in grid-tied mode during operating scenario 1.
Table 11.13 Load flow table in grid-tied mode during operating scenario 2.
Table 11.14 Voltage harmonics bus information in grid-tied mode.
Table 11.15 Current harmonics bus information in grid-tied mode.
Table 11.16 Bus voltage during line-to-ground fault.
Table 11.17 Bus current during line-to-ground fault.
Table 11.18 Bus voltage during three-phase fault at the main bus.
Table 11.19 Bus voltage during line-to-ground fault at bus 3.
Table 11.20 Bus current during line-to-ground fault at bus 3.
Table 11.21 Load flow table during loss PV 1 in grid-tied mode.
Table 11.22 Summarized comparison of reports generated from electrical transie...
Chapter 12
Table 12.1 Comparison of chargers.
Table 12.2 Different segments’ charging power and its requirement.
Table 12.3 The DC microgrid device installed sizes.
Chapter 13
Table 13.1 Performance comparison of commercial EV charging stations on microg...
Table 13.2 Commercial systems on a weekly and monthly EV handling delay for ef...
Chapter 14
Table 14.1 PV cell and DC–DC converter model specification.
Table 14.2 PSO parameter settings.
Chapter 15
Table 15.1 Switching states [28, 29, 37].
Table 15.2 System parameters for variable-speed wind energy system [28–34].
Chapter 1
Figure 1.1 Overview of HOMER analysis.
Figure 1.2 Location of Thiagarajar College of Engineering.
Figure 1.3 Block diagram of the test system.
Figure 1.4 Process flow of the proposed methodology.
Figure 1.5 Working of ML algorithm.
Figure 1.6 Monthly patterns before and after DSM.
Figure 1.7 Location of the TCE-EEE department.
Figure 1.8 Availability of resources.
Figure 1.9 Monthly average energy demand of the EEE department (before and aft...
Figure 1.10 Configuration—cost analysis.
Chapter 2
Figure 2.1 Price forecasting model [47].
Figure 2.2 Electricity price forecasting [24].
Figure 2.3 Machine learning methods [43].
Figure 2.4 Forecasting results for the month of October to November and Februa...
Figure 2.5 Forecasting results for the months of June and December.
Figure 2.6 Forecasting results for January and October.
Chapter 3
Figure 3.1 Single-line diagram of a microgrid with renewable energy sources, e...
Figure 3.2 Classification of energy storage devices.
Figure 3.3 Cross-section of an individual UC and a hydrogen FC [14].
Figure 3.4 Battery models [30].
Figure 3.5 Block diagram of a generic BMS.
Chapter 4
Figure 4.1 Data from the World Resources Institute.
Figure 4.2 Data from the International Energy Agency.
Figure 4.3 Schematic diagram of a hybrid microgrid.
Figure 4.4 DC-DC converter topology.
Figure 4.5 Unidirectional resonant DC–DC converters.
Figure 4.6 Bidirectional isolated DC–DC converter.
Figure 4.7 Bidirectional isolated DC–DC converter.
Figure 4.8 Bidirectional non-isolated DC–DC converter.
Figure 4.9 Bidirectional non-isolated DC–DC converter.
Figure 4.10 Classical switching with linear control.
Figure 4.11 Classical switching with model predictive control.
Figure 4.12 Classical switching with intelligent control.
Figure 4.13 Classical switching with digital control.
Figure 4.14 Efficiency vs switching frequency of unidirectional resonant DC–DC...
Figure 4.15 Efficiency vs switching frequency of bidirectional isolated DC–DC ...
Figure 4.16 Efficiency vs switching frequency of bidirectional non-isolated DC...
Figure 4.17 Efficiency vs power rating of unidirectional resonant DC–DC conver...
Figure 4.18 Efficiency vs power rating of bidirectional isolated DC–DC convert...
Figure 4.19 Efficiency vs power rating of bidirectional non-isolated DC–DC con...
Figure 4.20 Total parts count of unidirectional resonant DC–DC converter.
Figure 4.21 Total parts count of bidirectional isolated DC–DC converter.
Figure 4.22 Total parts count of bidirectional non-isolated DC–DC converter.
Chapter 5
Figure 5.1 Classification of multilevel inverters.
Figure 5.2 Structure of five-phase five-level MLI.
Figure 5.3 Structure of six-phase five-level MLI.
Figure 5.4 Structure of seven-phase five-level MLI.
Figure 5.5 Multilevel modulation techniques.
Figure 5.6 Phase-shifted carrier waveforms, modulating waveform, regions, and ...
Figure 5.7 Carrier (triangular) and reference (sinusoidal) waveform for five-l...
Figure 5.8 Output voltage of a five-level converter with PD-LSPWM.
Figure 5.9 Offset signal.
Figure 5.10 Five-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage ...
Figure 5.11 Six-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage f...
Figure 5.12 Seven-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage...
Figure 5.13 Five-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage ...
Figure 5.14 Six-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage f...
Figure 5.15 Seven-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage...
Figure 5.16 Five-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage ...
Figure 5.17 Six-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage f...
Figure 5.18 Seven-phase five-level CHB inverter phase voltage and line voltage...
Chapter 6
Figure 6.1 Block diagram of hybrid renewable energy storage system.
Figure 6.2 Equivalent circuit of a PV cell.
Figure 6.3 Subsystem 1—simulink model of the photo current.
Figure 6.4 Subsystem 2—simulink model of the reverse saturation current.
Figure 6.5 Subsystem 3—simulink model of the saturation current.
Figure 6.6 Interconnected subsystems of the PV panel.
Figure 6.7 Simulink model of the boost converter.
Figure 6.8 Simulink model of the equilibrium voltage.
Figure 6.9 Simulink model of the ohmic over-potential.
Figure 6.10 Simulink model of the cathode activation potential.
Figure 6.11 Simulink model of the hydrogen pressure.
Figure 6.12 Simulink model of the Nernst equation.
Figure 6.13 Simulink model of the fuel cell.
Figure 6.14 (a) PV characteristics of the solar panel at a constant temperatur...
Figure 6.15 (a) PV characteristics of the solar panel at a constant irradiance...
Figure 6.16 J–V characteristics of the PEM electrolyzer.
Figure 6.17 Ohmic, anode, and concentration potential of the PEM electrolyzer ...
Figure 6.18 J–V characteristic curves obtained for PEM fuel cell at different ...
Figure 6.19 Flow chart for power regulation.
Figure 6.20 Simulink model of a hybrid renewable storage system.
Figure 6.21 Input of solar PV at various irradiance levels.
Figure 6.22 (a and b) Output voltage and current of the solar power system.
Figure 6.23 The excess power delivered to the electrolyzer.
Figure 6.24 The demand of power to turn on a fuel cell.
Figure 6.25 Hydrogen flow rate from an electrolyzer.
Figure 6.26 (a) DC output voltage of a PEM fuel cell and (b) DC output current...
Figure 6.27 (a) Inverter output voltage of a PEM fuel cell and (b) inverter ou...
Figure 6.28 (a and b) Inverter output voltage and current of a solar PV panel....
Chapter 7
Figure 7.1 Block diagram for overall representation.
Figure 7.2 Structural outline for the proposed system in HOMER.
Figure 7.3 Google map of the selected shopping complex.
Figure 7.4 Global horizontal insolation level for the chosen site.
Figure 7.5 Ambient temperature layout for the selected site.
Figure 7.6 Daily profile for the highest demand of the month of September.
Figure 7.7 Electrical energy supplied to the electric vehicles.
Figure 7.8 Single-line diagram for the solar power DC microgrid.
Figure 7.9 Overall energy production comparison.
Figure 7.10 Comparison between a base case grid and the proposed case grid lev...
Figure 7.11 Energy production difference between the conventional grid and the...
Figure 7.12 Battery state of charge
versus
time in the shopping complex.
Chapter 8
Figure 8.1 Block diagram representing a stand-alone PV system.
Figure 8.2 Flow chart reflecting the design steps.
Figure 8.3 Image illustrating the GIMT campus.
Figure 8.4 Geographical site parameters of Krishnagar over the year.
Figure 8.5 Optimum tilt angle of the PV panel.
Figure 8.6 Daily energy consumption in the ECE department (room-wise) on an ho...
Chapter 9
Figure 9.1 Block diagram of the PID controller [8].
Figure 9.2 Flow chart of the PSO algorithms.
Figure 9.3 Integration of the wind energy system [12].
Figure 9.4 Frequency deviations with and without the PID controller.
Figure 9.5 Wind output power.
Figure 9.6 Change in power.
Figure 9.7 EV output power.
Chapter 10
Figure 10.1 Microgrid model.
Figure 10.2 Compact system of the primary control system.
Figure 10.3 Drop controller block diagram.
Figure 10.4 Voltage controller’s block diagram.
Figure 10.5 Current controller’s block diagram.
Figure 10.6 Architecture of the distributed generation control system.
Figure 10.7 Block diagram of the compensator control section.
Figure 10.8 An illustration of a single line of a test network.
Figure 10.9 Point of connection circuit breaker status change.
Figure 10.10 Total power received by the microgrid from the power system.
Figure 10.11 Getting out of the allowed range of voltage and frequency.
Figure 10.12 Power injected by the storage source and distributed generation s...
Figure 10.13 Voltage fluctuations of distributed generation and storage source...
Figure 10.14 Microgrid frequency range.
Figure 10.15 Step changes of demand in the islanded microgrid.
Figure 10.16 Compatibility of the stored power.
Figure 10.17 Changes in the power of distributed generations.
Figure 10.18 Voltage energy storage source and distributed generations.
Figure 10.19 Microgrid frequency.
Figure 10.20 Changes in renewable source power.
Figure 10.21 The injected power of the storage source and distributed generati...
Figure 10.22 Voltage fluctuations of distributed generation and storage source...
Figure 10.23 Microgrid frequency.
Chapter 11
Figure 11.1 Schematic diagram of a microgrid operating in islanded mode.
Figure 11.2 Daily load profile of a school campus.
Figure 11.3 Load flow model in electrical transient analysis program for the i...
Figure 11.4 Load flow model in Electrical Transient Analysis Program for the i...
Figure 11.5 Voltage waveform in islanded mode.
Figure 11.6 Voltage harmonic spectrum in islanded mode.
Figure 11.7 Voltage profile during line-to-ground fault.
Figure 11.8 Current profile during line-to-ground fault.
Figure 11.9 Voltage profile during the three-phase fault.
Figure 11.10 Current profile during the three-phase fault.
Figure 11.11 Voltage profile during line-to-ground fault at bus 3.
Figure 11.12 Current profile during line-to-ground fault at bus 3.
Figure 11.13 Load flow analysis model in electrical transient analysis program...
Figure 11.14 Critical clearing time and critical clearing angle for the three-...
Figure 11.15 Critical clearing time and critical clearing angle for line-to-gr...
Figure 11.16 Block diagram of grid-tied microgrid.
Figure 11.17 Load flow model in electrical transient analysis program for grid...
Figure 11.18 Load flow model in electrical transient analysis program for grid...
Figure 11.19 Voltage waveform in grid-tied mode.
Figure 11.20 Voltage harmonic spectrum in grid-tied mode.
Figure 11.21 Voltage profile during line-to-ground fault at bus 1.
Figure 11.22 Current profile during line-to-ground fault at bus 1.
Figure 11.23 Voltage profile during three-phase fault at the main bus.
Figure 11.24 Current profile during three-phase fault at the main bus.
Figure 11.25 Voltage profile during line-to-ground fault at bus 3 in grid-tied...
Figure 11.26 Current profile during line-to-ground fault at bus 3 in grid-tied...
Figure 11.27 Load flow model in electrical transient analysis program during l...
Chapter 12
Figure 12.1 MG power balance on a sunny day.
Figure 12.2 A typical microgrid network.
Figure 12.3 Typical electric vehicle states.
Figure 12.4 Smart charging for solar and wind generation.
Figure 12.5 Types of electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
Figure 12.6 Electric vehicle charging chracteristics.
Figure 12.7 A microgrid design for domestic application.
Figure 12.8 Industrial microgrid concept.
Figure 12.9 V2G system block diagram for an industrial microgrid.
Figure 12.10 Typical electric vehicle charger configuration.
Figure 12.11 A DC microgrid system through an energy management system.
Figure 12.12 Electric vehicle charging optimization control strategy.
Chapter 13
Figure 13.1 The use of electric vehicles increases the level of microgrid reso...
Figure 13.2 System-level electric charging for battery and control: (a) level ...
Figure 13.3 Flow chart of the proposed electric vehicle charging scheme with m...
Figure 13.4 Voltage profile for the number of charging electric vehicles in a ...
Figure 13.5 State of charge at various EV charging stations: (a) village, (b) ...
Figure 13.6 Incremental cost saving (Rs/kWh) in EV charging station handling: ...
Figure 13.7 Simulated EV handling improvement for different levels of charging...
Figure 13.8 Energy saving after implementing the proposed charging: (a) level ...
Chapter 14
Figure 14.1 Layout of EV charging station for microgrid.
Figure 14.2 Types of plug.
Figure 14.3 The three main types of EV charging cable.
Figure 14.4 EV charging mode 1.
Figure 14.5 EV charging mode 2.
Figure 14.6 EV charging mode 3.
Figure 14.7 EV charging mode 4.
Figure 14.8 EV charger arrangement: (a) on-board and (b) off-board.
Figure 14.9 System block diagram.
Figure 14.10 Principle of the IC algorithm.
Figure 14.11 (a) Flow chart of the PSO. (b) Flow chart of the proposed IC-MPPT...
Figure 14.12 I–V and P–V curves.
Figure 14.13 Power vs time of PV output and DC–DC converter output.
Figure 14.14 Voltage vs time of PV output and DC–DC converter output.
Figure 14.15 Current vs time of PV output and DC–DC converter output.
Figure 14.16 Optimum voltage turned by PSO.
Figure 14.17 Maximum power tracking of IC MPPT with and without PSO optimum vo...
Figure 14.A2 Overall system in MATLAB/Simulink.
Chapter 15
Figure 15.1 Block diagram of VSWT stand-alone wind battery system with control...
Figure 15.2 PMSG with three-phase diode rectifier [3–7].
Figure 15.3 Block diagram of boost converter [8–13].
Figure 15.4 Control structure for MPPT [13].
Figure 15.5 Electrical equivalent of battery [14–17].
Figure 15.6 Schematic diagram of DC–DC bidirectional converter [17–22].
Figure 15.7 Schematic diagram of DC–DC bi-directional converter [16, 17].
Figure 15.8 Flow chart of control strategy for battery storage system [19–27]....
Figure 15.9 Equivalent circuit of two-level VSI [28, 29].
Figure 15.10 Vector control structure for inverter control [1, 2, 25, 26, 32]....
Figure 15.11 Block diagram of LC filter [40, 41].
Figure 15.12 Step change variation in wind speed (m/s) [1, 3, 5, 7].
Figure 15.13 Rotor speed for step change wind speed (rad/s) [5–7].
Figure 15.14 Mechanical torque for step change wind speed (N-m) [5–7].
Figure 15.15 DC current for step change wind speed (A) [5–7].
Figure 15.16 DC power output for step change wind speed (W) [5–7].
Figure 15.17 Staircase variation in wind speed (m/s) [1, 2, 4].
Figure 15.18 Staircase rotor speed (rad/s) [1, 2, 4].
Figure 15.19 Mechanical torque for staircase wind speed (N-m) [1, 2, 4].
Figure 15.20 DC current for staircase wind speed (A) [1, 2, 4].
Figure 15.21 DC power output for staircase wind speed (W) [1, 2, 4].
Figure 15.22 Random variation in speed of the wind (m/s) [8–13].
Figure 15.23 Rotor speed for random wind speed change (rad/s) [8–13].
Figure 15.24 Mechanical torque for random wind speed change (N-m) [8–13].
Figure 15.25 DC current for random wind speed change (A) [8–13].
Figure 15.26 DC power for random wind speed change (W) [8–13].
Figure 15.27 DC link voltage at constant load (volts) [14–21].
Figure 15.28 Inverter output voltage (volts) [22–27].
Figure 15.29 Inverter output current (A) [22–27].
Figure 15.30 Load voltage at constant load (volts) [22–27].
Figure 15.31 Load current at constant load (A) [22–27].
Figure 15.32 Active power at constant load (W) [22–27].
Figure 15.33 Reactive power at constant load (W) [22–27].
Figure 15.34 DC link voltage when the load is reduced to half (volts) [25–30]....
Figure 15.35 Load voltage when the load is reduced to half (volts) [25–30].
Figure 15.36 Load current when the load is reduced to half (A) [25–30].
Figure 15.37 Active power when the load is reduced to half (W) [25–30].
Figure 15.38 Reactive power when the load is reduced to half (VAR) [25–30].
Figure 15.39 Voltage of DC link when the load is increased to half (volts) [31...
Figure 15.40 Output voltage across load when the load is increased to half (vo...
Figure 15.41 Output current across load when the load is increased to half (A)...
Figure 15.42 Active power when the load is increased to half (W) [31–37].
Figure 15.43 Reactive power when the load is increased to half (VAR) [31–37]....
Figure 15.44 Voltage across resistive and inductive load under load switching ...
Figure 15.45 Load current across resistive and inductive load under load switc...
Figure 15.46 Active power across resistive and inductive load under load switc...
Figure 15.47 Reactive power across resistive and inductive load under load swi...
Figure 15.48 Voltage across practical inductive and non-linear load switching ...
Figure 15.49 Current across practical inductive and non-linear load switching ...
Figure 15.50 Active power across practical inductive and non-linear load switc...
Figure 15.51 Reactive power across practical inductive and non-linear load swi...
Cover Page
Table of Contents
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Acknowledgements
Begin Reading
Index
Also of Interest
WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
ii
iii
iv
xv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
Scrivener Publishing100 Cummings Center, Suite 541JBeverly, MA 01915-6106
Publishers at ScrivenerMartin Scrivener ([email protected])Phillip Carmical ([email protected])
Edited by
P. Sivaraman
C. Sharmeela
and
P. Sanjeevikumar
This edition first published 2024 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA and Scrivener Publishing LLC, 100 Cummings Center, Suite 541J, Beverly, MA 01915, USA© 2024 Scrivener Publishing LLCFor more information about Scrivener publications please visit www.scrivenerpublishing.com.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Wiley Global Headquarters111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials, or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
ISBN 9781394166305
Cover image: Pixabay.comCover design by Russell Richardson
Foremost, thanks to the Almighty for his everlasting love throughout this endeavour.
Acknowledgement is always a phrase to appreciate the dedication, commitment, resources and timely solution either with the digital platform or real-time medium, timely support and bond of encouragement is the vital tool for teachers and researchers from their Institution.
In these regards, we editors express our sincere thanks to Mr. S. Muthukumaran, Director, TECH Engineering Services, Chennai, India; Mr. K. Balaji, Vertiv, Chennai, India; Mr. K. Sasikumar, Electrical Engineer, Mott MacDonald, Noida, India; Department of Electrical Engineering, Information Technology, and Cybernetics, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway and Center for Electric Vehicle Technologies, Center for Energy Storage Systems, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai, India.
We editors got the full support and executed the task promptly where our Institution devoted the time and liberty for enhancement with research in particular to make this book a great success.
I wish One and All for the devoted time frame effort for the grand success with the book.
Warm regards,Editors
A. C. Vishnu Dharssini*, S. Charles Raja and P. Venkatesh
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India
In the most recent times, renewable resource-based local power generation and effective utilization are evolving as a hot research topic, as it mainly focuses on ensuring a reliable energy supply to the consumers. It mitigates the challenges of the volatile nature of renewable sources and uncertainties in demand rise. To ensure the sustainable operation of microgrids specifically, a deep knowledge of demand and generation trends is required. The proposed research framework highlights the promising supply-side management approach of available renewable sources along with the existing grid connection, the optimal energy configuration of which is found with the help of Hybrid Optimization of the Multiple Energy Resources simulation software. The scope of the chapter is to assure the continual supply to meet the load of a particular department block in an educational institution, Thiagarajar College of Engineering (TCE), Madurai (9.8821° N, 78.0816° E). The feasibility study deals with prioritizing available sources such as solar photovoltaic generation, diesel generation, and backup facilities in TCE. Based on seasonal energy trends and availability, a significant demand-side management technique (DSM) technique is feasible for educational buildings: load shifting is implemented. The approach tracks the optimal energy configuration among four configurations and compares the configuration before and after the DSM incorporation. It also pinned out the probability of cost reduction by the optimal source allocation strategy.
Keywords: Building energy management, feasibility analysis, demand side management, optimal source allocation, ToU tariff
In this modern era, the local power generation and utilization concept is considered an asset and efficacious approach to have a better energy management system [1]. This encourages the penetration of renewable energy resources and considerably reduces the usage of conventional fossil fuels [2]. The real-time challenge with the approach is adopting it to an existing grid-connected system without collapsing the system and also ensuring optimal source utilization [3, 4]. The alarming usage of conventional resources which are emitting greenhouse gas paves the way to emphasize the need of incorporating an appropriate demand-side management (DSM) strategy [5]. The DSM techniques encompass various kinds of strategies such as load shifting, peak clipping, valley filling, strategic load growth, strategic load conservation, etc. [6]. Some DSM implemented reduce loads in peak hours, resulting in a demand-response approach [7]. The applicability of DSM with respect to available resources in a location provides a clear insinuation on conventional sources [8]. Some strategies are also tariff-based, aimed to reduce additional charges and switch load in reference to the time of use principle [9]. The preliminary requirement for introducing building energy management is possible with smart energy meters which enable to model the demand pattern of that particular building. The process is generally termed modeling demand, involving the procedural gathering of available information as a numerical note and updating knowledge on the state of existing energy systems [10].
Modeling the demand pattern of smart buildings is essential based on economic and environmental impact on energy utilization trends and sustainable use of available resources [11]. Enormous studies and research articles plotted the problem by various approaches and techniques, but it has a limitation as it varies from system to system and also relies upon system considerations [12]. Each work proposes a different and unique supply and demand-side management approach according to the dataset type, i.e., whether univariate or multivariate. Some researchers focused on comparing supply–demand result patterns [13] accompanied by an analysis of the cost involved in bidding for supply from each kind of source in case of the availability of multiple sources [14].
The study presented in [15] put forth a stochastic programming model for staging the performance of a smart microgrid by reducing the operating cost and emissions with non-conventional resources. Plenty of work dealt with this problem using optimization techniques which are found to be generic and primordial. Vishnupriyan and Manoharan [16] adopted the study with a HOMER simulation software for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems under six different climatic conditions, and the results were optimized to improve the renewable fraction in both before and after the DSM strategies. Similar works are presented in [17, 18] for residential and commercial buildings, promoting optimal energy sources based on computed net present cost (NPC) and cost of energy (COE).
Figure 1.1 Overview of HOMER analysis.
From this extensive survey, it is clear that predictive DSM implementation by data pertaining to the demand load of higher education institutional buildings was not collected and approached to pick out optimum energy configuration with a standard analytical approach. This paves the way to the initiation of strategic DSM, i.e., load shifting and HOMER software solution as in Figure 1.1.
To ensure a balancing operation of the microgrid from both the supply end and the customer end.
To prioritize the utilization of local generation with available renewable resources which, in turn, results in the reduction of transmission losses.
To promote building energy management.
To schedule the operation of each load and to trace corresponding source combinations to feed them.
To estimate the lifetime expenditure, i.e., over 25 years for each source configuration.
The test system—Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering in Thiagarajar College of Engineering—is the study location in the Madurai district of Tamil Nadu, as shown in the map (Figure 1.2). The study area has four sources of supply which are solar PV panels with a net capacity of 18 kW from an overall 450-kW system, a 10-kVA diesel generator system, battery storage of 1 kWh lead acid, and grid supply as depicted in Figure 1.3. The test system consists of highly equipped laboratories with Elmeasure smart meters affixed to trace the energy usage pattern. The data gets continually stored in the server which is reclaimed in the centralized server system on demand using Elmeasure’s ElNet software.
Figure 1.4 shows the overall process initiating from data fetching to optimal configuration selection. The data obtained from various smart meters will possess certain default shortcomings that can be offset by adopting proper data handling techniques. There exists a subsequent process to get coherent worthwhile data sources at the end of the data pre-processing approach. These data catered to the analytics part to draw insights from the data. In the proposed methodology, data is fed to the decision tree algorithm which decides on loads to be operated at a particular time. In short, it schedules the primary load and secondary loads in a building with respect to time. Following this, it incorporates the most probable DSM strategy, i.e., load shifting. Next, for effective supply side management, load patterns before and after DSM are laid hold of and fed to the HOMER software. It compares each configuration in terms of environmental, technical, and economic aspects, resulting in a best approach (before/after DSM with appropriate supply-side management).
Figure 1.2 Location of Thiagarajar College of Engineering.
Figure 1.3 Block diagram of the test system.
Figure 1.4 Process flow of the proposed methodology.
The loads and appliances in the test system are tagged as primary and secondary loads based on customer preferences and utilization premises. The essential loads for the active functioning of laboratories apart from test kits and devices are tagged as primary loads, while the rest, for sophistication in utilization, are tagged as secondary loads. The categorization of loads in the building is presented in Table 1.1.
Lighting loads, fans, routers, projectors, and plug points are considered primary, while air conditioners, water dispensers, exhausters, printers, and coolants are secondary loads. With the knowledge of available loads and their importance, loads are preferred accordingly. Tracing the existing pattern of consumption is essential as it is one of the determining factors for implementing DSM.
The most probable and effective DSM approach—load shifting—is applicable as it involves the effective usage of loads without violating any kind of limitations. It prevents reaching the maximum demand limit and thereby ensures the neglect of penalties. The previous consumption record which is properly maintained in the server is retrieved and treated to feed the machine learning algorithm. The decision tree algorithm thus extracts insights from data and makes decisions on switching appliances. Its decision relies entirely on energy patterns obtained from smart meters, maximum demand limit, the peak time of consumption, and, finally, on the time of the day. The algorithm is designed to have average monthly patterns on a 24-h time scale for incorporating the appropriate DSM technique, and it also varies with academic semester schedules. Thus, net demand patterns before and after DSM over each month are required to be called out to comparatively visualize the role of the ML algorithm.
Table 1.1 Categorization of loads.
Primary load
Secondary load
Lights
Air conditioners
Fans
Water dispensers
Plug points
Exhausters
Projectors
Printers
Routers
Refrigerators
Table 1.2 Distinguished time slots.
Time slot
Period
11.15 a.m. to 01.15 a.m. and 02.15 p.m. to 04.15 p.m.
Peak hours
09.00 a.m. to 11.15 p.m.
Normal hours
01.15 p.m. to 2.15 a.m. and 04.15 p.m. to 09.00 a.m.
Off-peak hours
The procedure adopted to train the ML algorithm is shown in Figure 1.5. The loads are shifted in correspondence to the time slot. The 24 h of a day are split into three distinguished time periods, namely, peak, normal and off-peak, as shown in Table 1.2. The algorithm checks the time period at the moment and cross-verifies the criteria as shown in the figure. Only primary loads are prioritized during peak hours, i.e., active laboratory sessions. During normal hours, loads are utilized based on the probability of maximum demand reach, and during off-peak hours, it is up to the consumer’s choice of load usage, accounting for both norms in the prior two slots.
The patterns of before and after DSM visualizes that a maximum reach of 80 kWh/day falls in January and is considered to be the peak consumption month, while in March and October the lowest consumption of below 40 kWh/day occurs. It was also observed that it is quite challenging to reduce the peak by shifting, as the possible time of shifting is only around morning (7:30 a.m.) to evening (6:30 p.m.). Still the ML was found to be effective in modifying the demand curve by reducing the peak.
Based on the decision, loads are shifted, and the demand curve is traced back on approximation, as shown in Figure 1.6. It was seen that reducing the peak over a working time slot will aid in the quality of energy utilization. In addition to ensuring this, both demand traces before and after DSM are fed to HOMER software, which comparatively analyzes the system to have suitable and profitable energy configurations.
Figure 1.5 Working of ML algorithm.
The HOMER software is initialized with the exact location of the EEE block in the TCE building, as shown in Figure 1.7. It falls at 9°53′ N latitude and 78°4.5′ E longitude and located at Thiruparankundram, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, 625015, India.
Figure 1.6 Monthly patterns before and after DSM.
Figure 1.7 Location of the TCE-EEE department.
After affixing the location details of the test system, data on renewable resources is obtained from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and NASA’s prediction of worldwide energy resources. The data on solar global horizontal irradiance and average temperature persisting in the particular location is collected for estimating the effective utilization of available renewable energy resources. The yearly average solar irradiance is about 5.61 kWh/m2/day, and it is represented in Figure 1.8.
Figure 1.8 Availability of resources.
The load data before DSM is incorporated initially to map out appropriate energy configuration without DSM, and then load data after DSM is fed for observation. The data on all three sources, excluding the grid which needed to be imputed for simulating the real-time system, is tabulated in Table 1.3.
The load categorizing and optimization with the DSM technique promotes the management of load consumption for achieving the desired objective. As per the DSM strategy, loads are prioritized and shifted with hourly data using the load shifting strategy. The comparative seasonal profile in Figure 1.9 shows the impact of DSM in the institution’s annual load profile.
The HOMER software is accounted for comparing four energy configurations under two scenarios (before and after DSM) as depicted in Table 1.4. The configurations are depicted by tabulation.
Table 1.3 Economical inputs.
S. no.
Resource component
Manufacturer
Size (kW)
Initial cost ($)
Replacement cost ($)
O&M cost ($)
Lifetime
1
PV array
TATA Solar Power system
1–18
27,000
24,300
0
20 years
2
Converter
Schneider Electric
1–7
2,625
2,345
10.00
15 years
3
Diesel generator
Cummins
10
1,600
1,440
0.100
15,000 hours
4
Battery storage system
EnerSys
1 kWh
247.67
227
10.00
10 years
Figure 1.9 Monthly average energy demand of the EEE department (before and after DSM).
The results witnessed a reduction in the peak load and load factor from 153.90 kW and 0.16 to 133.63 kW and 0.19. Following it, the seasonal profile with a box plot comparatively depicts the variation in the range of consumption over each month. The average peak of every month is reduced to a greater extent and is notified clearly.
The configurations are compared based on economical, technical, and environmental aspects considering the factors—components involved, net generation, consumption range, emissions, and, finally, cost—which are tabulated in Table 1.5. The ratio of components involved varies with system configuration, and the tabulation shows the base system to meet the load.
On the whole, the configurations after DSM are more reliable compared with the configurations before DSM. Based on production, total range of consumption, and rate of emission, DSM results in bounteous outcomes. Accounting for each combination of supplies, configurations 1 and 5, configurations 2 and 6, configurations 3 and 7, and configurations 4 and 8 are compared.
Configurations 1 and 2 and configurations 5 and 6 possess a high renewable fraction of 9.60 and 9.70, respectively. Hence, the optimal configuration from the aspect of the ratio of integrating renewable resources is among these pairs of configurations. Finally, concerning the economic cost involved in each configuration, the initial capital increases with the addition of new energy sources. The operating cost involved varies with configuration as it varies with accounted energy sources for that particular configuration, while levelized COE is found almost similar to each configuration, except configuration 4 and configuration 8. Next to that, NPC emerges as a determining factor to trace the optimal configuration among combos of four configurations.
Table 1.4 HOMER simulation configurations before and after DSM.
Configuration
Before DSM
After DSM
PV + grid
PV + battery + grid
PV + DG + grid
PV + battery + DG + grid
Table 1.5 Comparative result analysis.
Description
Without DSM
With DSM
Config 1
Config 2
Config 3
Config 4
Config 5
Config 6
Config 7
Config 8
Component (kW)
Solar PV
3
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
DG
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
Converter
2.42
2.44
2.42
2.56
2.42
2.42
2.42
2.42
Battery
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
Grid
148
148
148
148
128
128
128
128
Production (kWh/year)
PV array
28,367
28,367
28,367
28,367
28,367
28,367
28,367
28,367
Grid purchases
200,893
200,711
200,828
200,702
197,800
197,799
197,800
197,797
Total production
229,260
229,078
229,260
229,105
226,167
226,167
226,167
226,187
PV capacity factor (%)
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
Renewable fraction (%)
9.60
9.60
9.50
9.50
9.70
9.70
9.68
9.68
Consumption (kWh/year)
Total consumption
219,000
219,000
219,000
219,900
216,000
216,000
216,000
216,000
Emission (kg/year)
Carbon dioxide
126,964
126,849
126,964
126,964
125010
125010
125010
125010
Sulphur dioxide
550
550
550
550
542
542
542
542
Nitrogen oxides
269
269
269
269
265
265
265
265
Cost
Initial cost ($)
29,625
29,873
29,945
30,033
29,625
29,873
29,945
30,033
Operating cost ($/year)
20,423.2
20,415.0
20,397.2
20,584
20,114
20,137
20,088
20,261
Total NPC ($)
293,647
293,788
293,899
296,133
289,649
290,200
290,913
291,463
COE ($/kW)
0.1023
0.1023
0.1024
0.1031
0.102
0.103
0.103
0.1029
Table 1.6 Comparative cost analysis.
Configurations
Year-0
Year-1
Year-15
Year-20
Year-25
Cap. cost
Op. cost
Op. cost
Rep. cost
Op. cost
Rep. cost
Op. cost
Salvage cost
Before DSM
Config 1
$29,625
$18,982
$8,525.9
$994.92
$6,407.79
$7,747.0
$4,814.9
$4,553.20
Config 2
$29,872
$18,974
$8,524.1
$994.92
$6,405.17
$7,747.0
$4,812.7
$4,553.20
Config 3
$29,785
$18,982
$8,527.6
$994.92
$6,407.79
$7,747.0
$4,814.9
$4,586.83
Config 4
$31,472
$19,124
$8,591.2
$994.92
$6,455.61
$7,819.4
$4,850.9
$4,916.73
After DSM
Config 5
$29,625
$18,690
$8,396.4
$994.92
$6,309.20
$7,747.0
$4,740.9
$4,553.20
Config 6
$29,872
$18,681
$8,400.6
$994.92
$6,312.39
$7,747.0
$4,743.3
$4,580.39
Config 7
$29,785
$18,690
$8,396.4
$994.92
$6,309.20
$7,747.0
$4,740.9
$4,889.54
Config 8
$31,472
$18,899
$8,412.6
$994.92
$6,328.39
$7,819.4
$4,792.2
$4,916.73
Focusing on the point of the Payback period or lifetime of the system under each configuration is another essential determining factor of optimal source selection depicted in Table 1.6. The HOMER simulation software estimates the system life over 25 years concerning capital investment cost, operating cost, replacement cost, and salvage cost as in Figure 1.10. As mentioned earlier, incorporating DSM upgrades the system’s effectiveness by reducing the operating cost to a notifiable extent. It is also evident that configurations operating all the available resources (configuration 4 and configuration 8) are considered to be the worst configuration under both DSM scenarios. Next to that configurations 3 and 7 involve diesel generation, operating which demands non-renewable fuel of higher economic cost and also results in an adverse impact on environmental aspects i.e., emission. Finally, the combo for optimal source configuration for the test system is configurations 1&5 and configurations 2&6 which slightly vary in economic aspects.
Despite all conflicts in choices, configuration 1 and 5 is found to be more reliable, efficient, favourable, economical, and environmental. Thus, energy configuration with solar PV panels and grid-tied systems with appreciable DSM strategy is found to be the best choice for promoting supply and demand side management in a building.
Figure 1.10 Configuration—cost analysis.
Simulated real-time hybrid renewable energy system with HOMER software.
Selected of optimal supply-side strategy along with existing Grid connection.
Traced the seasonality trend in energy consumption.
Compared energy configuration under both with and without DSM.
Done economic analysis with NPC and COE metrics.
This study presented hybrid supply and demand side management for collected smart energy meter data on consumption in the Electrical and Electronics Engineering department of Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai. Four different source configurations under two scenarios in terms of the Demand side management approach is concerned. The test system adopted consists of different sources – solar PV, Diesel, and Battery systems along with a grid connection. The strategic DSM using a machine learning algorithm renders reduced peak demand compared with the system without DSM. The following suitable results are incorporated and compared using the HOMER software tool. It compares the four combinations of resources before and after DSM. The methodology adopted highlights that configuration 5 with PV solar generation along with grid after the application of DSM is the best configuration for energy requirements in the considered test location. On the whole, the chapter emphasizes that extracting in-depth knowledge on local generations and supply sources in a smart environment facilitates customer end in planning building energy strategies concerning economic and environmental aspects. The approach of Demand cum supply side management creates a possibility of increasing the usage of Renewable energy sources among the rest and also ensures effective energy utilization at minimal cost expenditure. Thus, adopting this study will definitely aid in the sustainable operation of the Microgrid.
1. Yang, Y., Ren, J., Solgaard, H.S., Xu, D., Nguyen, T.T., Using multi-criteria analysis to prioritize renewable energy home heating technologies.
Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.
, 29, 36–43, 2018.
2. Hadi Mousavi-Nasab, S. and Sotoudeh-Anvari, A., An extension of the bestworst method with D numbers: Application in the evaluation of renewable energy resources.
Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.
, 40, 1–19, 2020.
3. Schlachtberger, D.P., Becker, S., Schramm, S., Greiner, M., Backup flexibility classes in emerging large-scale renewable electricity systems.
Energy Convers. Manag.
, 125, 336–46, 2016.
4. Elavarasan, R.M., The motivation for renewable energy and its comparison with other energy sources: A review.
Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. Res.
, 3, em0076, 2019.
5. Lampropoulos, I., Kling, W.L., Ribeiro, P.F., Van Den Berg, J., History of demand side management and classification of demand response control schemes.
IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet.
, pp. 1–5, 2013.
6. Gellings, C.W., The concept of demand-side management for electric utilities.
Proc. IEEE
, 73, 1468–70, 1985.
7. Warren, P., A review of demand-side management policy in the UK.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
, 29, 941–51, 2014.
8. Ebubekir, S.S., Safak, B.I., Muammer, K., Demand side management opportunities, framework, and implications for sustainable development in resource-rich countries: Case study Qatar.
J. Clean. Prod.
, 241, 118332, 2019.
9. Bourhnane, S., Abid, M. R., Lghoul, R., Zine-Dine, K., Elkamoun, N., Benhaddou, D., Machine learning for energy consumption prediction and scheduling in smart buildings.
SN Appl. Sci.
, 2, 1–10, 2020.
10. Maryam, K., Gou, Z., Dupre, K., Energy use characteristics and benchmarking for higher education buildings.
Energy Build.
, 164, 61–76, 2018.
11. Cai, H., Shen, S., Lin, Q., Li, X., Xiao, H., predicting the energy consumption of residential buildings for regional electricity supply-side and demand-side management.
IEEE Access
, 7, 30386–30397, 2019,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2901257
.
12. Mokhtara, C., Negrou, B., Bouferrouk, A., Yao, Y., Settou, N., Ramadan, M., Integrated supply-demand energy management for the optimal design of off-grid hybrid renewable energy systems for residential electrification in arid climates.
Energy Convers. Manag.
, 221, July, 113192, 2020,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113192
.
13. Aghajani, G.R., Shayanfar, H.A., Shayeghi, H., Demand side management in a smart micro-grid in the presence of renewable generation and demand response.
Energy
, 126, 622e637, 2017.
14. Vishnupriyan, J. and Manoharan, P.S., Prospects of hybrid photovoltaic diesel standalone system for six different climate locations in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu.
J. Clean. Prod.
, 185, 309e321, 2018a.
15. Mohammad, A.V.R., Roghaye, G., Parisa, R., Soroush, M., Mehrdad, A., Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid power system based on the cost-effective hydrogen production method for rural electrification, a case study in Iran.
Energy
, 190, 116421, 2020.
16. Rebecca, N., Heejin, C., Jian, Z., Techno-economic analysis of the geothermal system in a residential building in Memphis, Tennessee.
J. Build. Eng.
, 27, 100993, 2020.
17. Chambon, C. L., Karia, T., Sandwell, P., Hallett, J. P., Techno-economic assessment of biomass gasification-based mini-grids for productive energy applications: The case of rural India.
Renew. Energ.
, 154, 432–444, 2020.
18. Petrillo, A., De Felice, F., Jannelli, E., Autorino, C., Minutillo, M., Lavadera., A.L., Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analysis model for a stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system.
Renew. Energ.,
95, 37–355, 2016.
*
Corresponding author
:
Challa Krishna Rao1,2*, Sarat Kumar Sahoo2 and Franco Fernando Yanine3
1Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Aditya Institute of Technology and Management Tekkali, A.P., India
2Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Parala Maharaja Engineering College, Berhampur, Affiliated to Biju Patnaik University of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, India
3School of Engineering of Universidad, Finis Terrae, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
In the power market, electricity price forecasting (EPF) is a crucial consideration for decision-making. The need to optimize earnings by adjusting bids in dayahead power markets is becoming more and more important to different market participants. Prior information is required for marketers to have an advantage over the competition while controlling the risk of pricing fluctuation. However, not all marketers must accurately predict the worth of future pricing when making decisions. To make a choice, it is necessary to determine whether the cost will be prohibitive. Thus, in order to determine the prices that have an impact on marketers, electricity price classification is first performed. Based on a threshold value, prices are categorized as low class prices and high class pricing. In order to determine the precise value of prices for utility maximization, the EPF has been explored next. In order to maximize advantage or utility, buying and selling bidding techniques rely on the accurate projections of prices for the following day. Effective forecasting models can improve the performance of producers and consumers, who play important roles in the electrical markets. The EPF approaches now in use produce complicated models and are not generalizable.The best method for forecasting prices with superior generalization performance, kernel functions, and distributive prediction is to use machine learning (ML)-based models. In order to forecast prices, machine learning-based electricity price forecasting has been studied.