5,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Old Street Publishing
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
- Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2014
Amber Haldane, doughty campaigner for contraceptive rights, wishes to free the masses from the chains of sexual repression and nasty-mindedness. As she gathers contributions for her new periodical, Birth Control Monthly, she encounters the luminaries of the age: H.G. Wells, preoccupied by the appearance of mysterious green spheres in his apple trees; T.S. Eliot, eager to pick her brains about glandular secretions; and Wilhelm Reich, whose theory of orgastic potency is fundamentally Misleading, Damaging and Wrong. Dexter's outrageous new comedy of manners will be relished by all devotees of sexual history and politi.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Ähnliche
PRAISE FOR GARY DEXTER
*
For Why Not Catch-21?
‘There are a few books that try to be funny about literature and don’t ever really get it right; Dexter always does’ Nick Lezard, Guardian
*
For The Oxford Despoiler
‘Wonderful … stuffed with period detail, literary gags and cameo parts (including a monosyllabic Oscar Wilde). The whole thing is a delight’
Sunday Telegraph
‘Grossly entertaining. Smutty, silly, very funny, and definitely not breakfast-table reading’
Observer
‘Deliciously silly, but crafted with such wry historical precision that Conan Doyle himself would struggle to deduce he was a parody’
Time Out
‘Sheer comic genius’ Michael Bywater
‘By proving that every mystery has, at its root, some outlandish perversion, St. Liver wittily shows off a culture in which sex was unmentionable and yet omnipresent. A warm and cleverly observed pastiche of the Victorian detective genre, fuelled by affection rather than by disdain’
Spectator
‘A masterful, perfectly pitched, nuanced and fiendishly funny Victorian detective memoir’
Erotic Review
‘So well written that the parody never gets in the way of the expertly woven yarns. The language is precise, witty, and an excellent homage to the period’
The Chap
‘Dexter proves a master, treading the fine line between good humour and bad taste with the greatest of sleaze’
Daily Telegraph
*
For All the Materials for a Midnight Feast
‘A beautifully crafted work of fiction, graduating from a low-key opening into a real page-turner … One of the year’s most impressive – and affecting – debuts’
Sunday Telegraph
NATURAL DESIRE IN HEALTHY WOMEN
GARY DEXTER
NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR
This book is based on the life of the birth control campaigner Marie Stopes (1880-1958), who did or said hardly any of the things in these pages.
Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
Titus 1:15
CONTENTS
PART ONE
I
THE BEGINNING
On the morning of 2nd September H.G. telephoned with some news.
‘I suppose you’ve seen the Express,’ he said.
‘I never read the Express.’
‘There’s an Australian fellow who claims that you pose the greatest threat to the Empire since the rise of Bolshevism and that you must be destroyed.’
‘Who?’ I asked.
‘Some politician or other. The Prime Minister, I think.’
‘Why?’
‘I imagine the usual reasons.’
But the true answer came in a flash. The Aboriginal tribespeople, who had not yet heard of the benefits of the ‘Racial’ sponge and simple vegetable oil, or alternatively the ‘Pro-Race’ high-dome rubber check pessary, were reproducing at a rapid rate, and the white inhabitants of Melbourne and Sydney, restricted to the fringes of their continent, were finding themselves unable to control the feckless breeding of the central mass… a race of intellectually and physically stunted resentful Aboriginal malcontents.
But to demonise me, when only I offer the solution!
‘And I need your advice,’ H.G. went on. ‘Last night the spheres returned. Glittering green spheres, amid the trees, moving gently and sighing.’
‘Apples,’ I said, putting the telephone down slowly. ‘They are apple trees.’
It seemed that the Catholic Church and its minions were gaining in influence. This recent attack from Australia could only have been masterminded from Rome. An attempt – ultimately successful – had already been made to burn down my travelling birth-control caravan in Birmingham, and by one of the very nurses who was supposed to be staffing it! After consuming two bottles of gin, she had ignited some gauze with a cigar.
And only that year, 1925, there had been the Papal Encyclical Casti Connubii, which, as anyone with an ounce of sense could see, was aimed squarely at me:
The Church of Christ, rising erect from the moral ruin which surrounds her, condemns utterly the practice of preventing the conception of children. The infant Christ would weep to see these iniquities, which arise from the perverted desire to frustrate God’s design for humanity. Eternal punishment – in one of the lower circles of hell, not in one of the comparatively tolerable ones around the fringes where pagan philosophers go – awaits those who persist in this work of Lucifer.
It was time for a new campaign.
II
MARGARET, AND THE OBTUSENESS OF A WAITRESS
I am proud to say that I was a formative influence on the work of Margaret Sanger. For years I exchanged letters with dear Margaret across the Atlantic, but our first face-to-face meeting was in April 1921, at a small corner-restaurant in Aldwych, The Golden Egg. It was undoubtedly what led her to her present success.
I remember my first glimpse of her. She was sitting at a table underneath a chandelier, and on her head was an enormous hat which trailed red and green feathers. Even seated she looked like a giantess. As I approached her table our eyes met, disconcertingly, at the same level.
‘Amber! Sit by me, lovely one!’ she boomed, patting the bench next to her.
I did so, and at the same moment a waitress arrived. Margaret asked for steak and onions. When told that the bill of fare comprised mainly teas, pastries and light meals, she evinced some disappointment, but eventually ordered three bacon rolls and a cup of coffee. I decided on tea and a macaroon.
‘That is the model of downtrodden womanhood in this country,’ Margaret said, none too quietly, gesturing after the waitress.
‘She did look a little tired.’
‘You saw the band on her finger? An engagement ring. Soon her Prince Charming will take her from here to a Palace of Labour that will make this seem like a rest home. Year after year the children will accumulate, each one with less and less strength, each one with less and less intellectual capacity – less even than their mother, who has never heard of steak and onions. In a decade she will be worn out. And all because she has no knowledge of family limitation.’
‘In Britain we have made some strides in that direction, I like to think, although there is of course much yet to achieve,’ I said. ‘My book Wedded Love…’
‘Dear, I have read your book. It is excellent, of course. But surely wedded love is half the problem. I am willing to wager that poor creature knows nothing even of the rudiments of reproduction.’
‘It is possible,’ I admitted.
At that moment the waitress returned to the table.
‘Sorry, cook says there’s no bacon.’
There was a pause. ‘No bacon,’ echoed Margaret, nodding ominously. Then she fixed the waitress with a bright smile. ‘May I ask, dear – I do hope you don’t mind my asking – have you given any thought to prevention?’
‘Beg pardon, Ma’am?’
‘I really have no wish to embarrass you – please tell me if you would prefer not to answer – but I and my friend here are poised on the edge of a campaign to liberate women from slavery. So my question was, in regard to your future married state – and again, I beg you not to answer if you find a particle of embarrassment in it – do you favour the sheath?’
I gathered from this that Margaret’s own preference was for the sheath, so I awaited the response with interest.
‘Do you mean Rudolf Valentino?’
‘No, no, dear, the sheath. Look, I have one here.’ Margaret reached into a large black medical bag, and laid on the table a flabby rubber tube which looked as if it had already been used. At the time I doubted that such could have been the case.
The waitress looked at the object and then at Margaret, and then at the feathers in Margaret’s hat. She seemed unwilling or unable to reply.
‘As I suspected,’ said Margaret. ‘The simple condom. Unknown.’
‘My colleague wished only to enquire,’ I said soothingly to the girl, ‘whether you had any intention of using the device. Of course I quite understand your feelings.’ I reached into my own more modest receptacle, where I had a good supply of ‘Racial’ rubber sponges. The device had at the time not received its world monomark, so I was cognisant of the risk I was taking in exposing it to the full view of my American rival. ‘I share the concern that the sheath does not allow the healthful interpenetration of secretions.’
‘That is Schrenk-Notzing’s view, certainly,’ said Margaret coolly.
‘And mine.’
‘I don’t doubt it,’ said Margaret. She turned her eyes to the girl. ‘Well then, perhaps this is more in your line.’ With a rapid jerk of the arm she produced a huge rubber diaphragm, which she must have been holding at the ready in her lap. The appearance of this object made the waitress start back. It looked like a marine creature. There was a noticeable diminution of background noise in The Golden Egg.
‘What is it?’ the waitress asked fearfully.
‘It is the Mensinga cap,’ declared Margaret. ‘It has been used with complete success in Holland for almost a generation, and yet no British woman has ever seen one.’
‘I have seen one,’ I countered, ‘and I believe it stretches the vagina. I would invite you to compare the sponge. You see, dear,’ I said confidentially to the waitress, ‘it can be used with ordinary vegetable oil, a condiment to be found in any kitchen.’
I had expected the waitress to brighten at the mention of kitchens, but her small eyes remained fixed in horror on Margaret’s jellyfish. Nevertheless I went on: ‘And so, for that matter, can this.’
I gracefully unfolded my hand, where I had concealed what I felt would be the ‘stinger’.
‘The high-domed solid-rim cervical cap, size one,’ I said with quiet dignity, remarking with satisfaction the contrast with the jellyfish. ‘What do you say to that?’
‘Is it for babies?’ the girl asked.
‘Quite the contrary,’ I said. ‘It is a contraceptive device.’ The blank expression on the waitress’s face suggested that further explanation was needed. ‘To insert the cap,’ I continued, ‘you simply need to find a comfortable position, perhaps standing with one foot raised on a stool, or lying down with knees bent, and then, using the fingers of one hand to create the required aperture, you squeeze the rim of the cap with your other hand…’ (‘No, no, no,’ muttered my luncheon partner) ‘…and push it over your cervix. You can run your finger around the rim of the cap to make sure that the cervix is covered. See how the suction works on this pool of coffee,’ I ventured somewhat teasingly, ‘although it should of course be washed afterwards. ‘Go on, try it. Test the suction by gently pinching and pulling on it. You should feel some resistance.’
At this point a little, greasy man appeared at the table: to judge from his dress and demeanour, he was an off-duty poulterer. He was very red in the face.
‘Now thass enough of that,’ he huffed. ‘You oughter be ashamed, talking like that to this young lady. She don’t understand but I do. I’ll fetch a policeman.’
‘I beg your pardon,’ said Margaret, rising from her seat. There was a great deal of her. The feathers on her hat brushed the chandelier, making it jingle. She was seven feet tall if she was an inch. The colour departed from the man’s face.
‘Is it your contention,’ Margaret said loudly, speaking ostensibly to him, but in reality addressing The Golden Egg in general, ‘that there are parts of the human body that may not be mentioned in a Christian restaurant in this country? Why do you not liberate yourselves and your children from mental bondage?’
‘I’ll give you mental bondage,’ parried the man. ‘I said I’d fetch a policeman and I will.’ He tried to make good his escape, but was unable to, for the reason that Margaret now had him firmly by the arm.
‘Woman is a creature of whim and fancy,’ she brayed. ‘As much as any man, she has a right to erotic fulfillment. And yet, for her, the consequences of her sex-yearning are to be tormented by the very body that has given her such delight. Imprisonment, pain, punishment! In this very capital thousands of women die every year in childbirth! Thousands more babies are born unloved and uncared for!’
‘You let go!’
‘Women of The Golden Egg!’ Margaret shouted. ‘In you is the single miraculous fertilisation that brings life into being! But may you be spared the long-drawn-out nightmare of an unwanted embryo growing within you – the most intimate and insidious of horrors!’
With that she raised her left hand in rhetorical appeal; it was still holding the jellyfish, which flapped. Several cries of insidious horror did indeed go up. Simultaneously Margaret let go the little man, who was so eager to escape that it seemed more as if she had propelled him down the aisle. Skittering on his heels, he span and fell on a trolley containing cakes and hot water. There was a loud crash and some screaming.
‘Dear Margaret,’ I said. ‘How about the British Library? Perhaps we could continue our discussion there.’
‘Very well,’ Margaret pronounced after a pause, eyeing the scene of devastation. ‘Intellectual refreshment will have to take the place of bodily refreshment. Lead on, lovely one!’
Margaret, I believe, learned much from this encounter. The essential contact had been made. It was not long after her return to the United States, following our meeting, that the Comstock obscenity laws were repealed, allowing the free flow of contraceptive information through the mails. I often heard subsequently of her campaigning successes and public appearances in Europe and America. Her methods were of course quite damaging and wrong, and her pronouncements concerning the sanctity of the working class and so on utterly false, and we pursued our separate ways and did not exchange a word for four years. But on the day I received that telephone call from H.G., I decided that Margaret would be the first person to learn of my new campaign.
Consequently I sat down in the little office at Westbury and dictated to my Secretary Number Two as follows:
2 September 1925
Westbury Park, nr Dorking
Dear Margaret,
How time has flown since we last spoke! There has been all the triumph of my three trials, the most recent before the House of Lords, and the resulting demand for my books, and I have had barely time to draw breath, so I apologise for not writing sooner. Attacks from the established churches have grown in virulence. The Irish Censorship Bill has meant that none of the newspapers in Eire are permitted to carry advertisements for rubber goods. Only today I received a letter from the Catholic Herald stating that it was regrettably unable to publish an article I had submitted on the topic of the Inquisition. The Catholic Church has a stranglehold on men’s minds. I have been forced to take ever more drastic steps in response, such as chaining copies of my books to railings outside Westminster Cathedral.
Despite all this, or because of it, I have decided to undertake a new publishing project – a periodical. It will contain news, opinion and, most prominently, extended essays by leading thinkers on the topics of birth control and eugenics. I intend to canvass not only the world’s great campaigners and scientists, but also our most eminent poets and artists. The aim will be nothing less than to smash organised religion. For the first time, ordinary men and women will be able to hear the true teaching of Jesus Christ, who preached only a normal, natural and healthy attitude towards sex life.
Please let me know whether you would be interested in contributing to such a project. How is Freddie? Is he still wearing the knitted woollen trousers we discussed?
I look forward so much to hearing from you.
Yours ever,
Amber Haldane
Little did I know that in twelve months’ time, as a direct result, I would be a guest on a small island in the Setonaikai Sea.
III
WEDDED LOVE
Wedded Love, on its publication in 1918, had much the same impact on the world as a man falling on a cake-trolley generally has in a crowded tea house. That is to say, pandemonium. I was both extolled and excoriated. Accusations of immorality were perhaps the most frequent line of attack, but my detractors also made play with my supposed desire for self-enrichment and self-aggrandisement, my insensitivity in the face of war losses, my defective taste, wish to destroy the Empire, blasphemy, medical inaccuracy, hubris, insanity and eugenic over-enthusiasm, often by the same post.
Running counter to this bitter torrent, however, was another, greater flood: of love. Women and men of all races, ages and creeds wrote to me expressing support for my work. Many women invited me into their homes to gather material for my next book. I soon had to hire a large team of secretaries merely to keep up with the post I received. Personal replies were soon out of the question – it was enough work simply to insert a form-letter dealing with the most common problems. My publisher, Fifield, bore the brunt of the avalanche of mail, and complained bitterly that, one way or another, Wedded Love had taken over the entire business. On an average day he would receive 160 bags of mail, filled to bursting – each bag the size of a person of small to medium height1. Soon he no longer had room for anything else, and yet it was imperative that he hire new staff to keep Wedded Love (which had broken all records for the firm) rolling off the presses.
Still the letters arrived. I calculated that if every man, woman and child in Britain had written a letter to me about their sex difficulties, it would still not have accounted for the prodigious volume of correspondence I received. Finally I realised that the secretaries I had employed at Westbury were posting their replies back to the publisher to be forwarded on to the correspondents, but that the publisher was returning them as if they were new letters. My secretaries duly treated these in the same way, inserting a form-letter and posting them back once more, thus creating an endless cycle. Unfortunately by the time I had arrived at this crucial insight, Fifield had blown his brains out with his service pistol. Undeterred, I sought a new publisher. I urgently needed to recoup my losses, having spent £3,267 6s 4d on postage.
Judging by the tenor of a good 43 per cent of my postbag, religious questions were a common thread of preoccupation, particularly the writings of the Apostle Paul and the more minatory sections of the Book of Revelation. It struck me that the support of the Church of England would be of enormous importance in swaying the public mood in favour of contraceptive rights. I determined, therefore, to create a questionnaire that could be sent out to 5,000 vicars selected at random from Crockford’s.This, it seemed to me, would bring me closer to the heart of Church thinking.
The questionnaire was as follows:
STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
To be returned to Dr Amber Haldane, Westbury Park, near Dorking, Surrey.
The information requested is asked in the interests of biological and anthropological research on the needs of married people. It has been addressed to Anglican clergymen alone, on the presumption that they will be more amenable to argument and persuasion, and will be better able to provide a representative picture of how rational beings go about sex activity. The more explicit the replies the better. No names will ever be divulged, used in diaries, autobiographies, or mentioned casually in the presence of anyone of any religious stamp or denomination whatsoever, or atheists or pantheists, or indeed anyone at all; the information will be treated with complete scientific detachment and tabulated in an emotionless manner. It will emphatically NOT be deposited with the British Library on open access.
Please state:
1) The number of years married
2) The age of wife
3) The condition of wife
4) The age of wife at first parturition
5) The number of children born, including miscarriages and stillbirths
6) Which children seem the most promising, eugenically speaking
7) Whether any methods of preventing undue increase of the family have been adopted
8) If such means have been adopted, whether any of the following were used:
(i) Total abstention (state how many years or decades)
(ii) Limitation of unions to safe periods
(iii) Limitation of unions to weekends or public holidays, or non-Lenten periods
(iv) Use of withdrawal – i.e. coitus interruptus
(v) Use of pessary
(vi) Use of Mensinga cap (not recommended)
(vii) Use of ‘Racial’ rubber sponge and solvent
(viii) Use of cervical cap of any of the following types:
(a) hollow-rim
(b) high-domed solid rim
(c) self-cleaning
(d) numbers 1–3
(e) numbers 4–6
(f) numbers 7–35*
(ix) Use of sheath
(x) Use of quinine
(xi) Use of zinc
(xii) Use of alum
(xiii) Use of ergot
(xiv) Use of boron
(xv) Jumping, bouncing, etc. after coitus
(xvi) Standing up
(xvii) Sealing the navel with sticking plaster
(xviii) Not touching the breasts during intercourse
(xix) Opposite corners of the room
(xx) Prayer
(xxi) Other means
9) Any particulars of individual sex peculiarities
10) Notable individual experiences presented in a narrative form.
Signed _______________
Date_________________
Address______________
_____________________
_____________________
This form may be sent back anonymously if required.
* If over size 35, state why.
The responses confirmed my suspicions that Anglicanism would present a ‘broad Church’ indeed on these matters. Some respondents assumed that contraception was forbidden by the Church, and eschewed it as zealously as any Papist. Most seemed never to have heard of the majority of the techniques I mentioned. A small number had experimented with methods such as zinc, which, when used directly on the genitals in its granular form, acts as a powerful anti-aphrodisiac. Outright abstention was very commonly encountered as a contraceptive method, as was the strict avoidance of any stimulation likely to lead to female orgasm.
There was much forthright comment on the issues I had raised. Some representative responses I set down here.
‘I blame you for the Great War. If there is ever another comparable conflagration I blame you for that too. You are a monster.’
Revd E. H. Badger
‘God bless you, you are a beacon to this country and a blessing to mankind.’
Mrs Ruth Hale, Blakeney Post Office (opened in error)
‘So many lads during the war acquired the habit of self-pollution. I read in one of your books while at the front that relaxing in a large, warm, steaming bath (the hotter the better) was an infallible cure but could never find adequate facilities to test the theory.’
Revd Bertie ‘BB’ Butler
‘Thou shalt do no murder… If God sends the babies he sends their breeches.’
Revd Rupert Mancroft
‘What abominably impudent questions!’
Mrs Revd Rupert Mancroft
‘We second what mother and father have said.’
Anna, Abigail, Arthur, Alan, Adalbert, Avelina and Absalom Mancroft
‘Dear noted bogus doctor of German philosophy Mrs Haldane, you are nothing but a pornographer; your books are textbooks of practical prostitution. I consider your questionnaire absolutely criminal. Nothing doing.’
Revd Elisha Bigg-Wither
‘I am glad that you raise eugenic concerns. The lower orders, if allowed to breed unchecked, could, by very pressure of numbers, rise and be a danger to the community. I think the time is not very far distant when we shall have to consider seriously what we are to do with the insane, the hopeless invalid, and all who are irredeemably degraded in mind and body… A painless extinction seems to be the only remedy, perhaps using some kind of poison gas. Nor do I see anything unchristian in such action.’
Revd A. Jodl
