0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 2,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 2,49 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Day of Wrath," Mór Jókai weaves a complex tapestry of passion, conflict, and the inexorable forces of history set against the backdrop of Hungary during tumultuous political upheaval. The novel skillfully blends romantic ideals with realism, reflecting its time and place while delving into the mindsets of its characters. Jókai's rich, descriptive prose highlights the emotional turmoil and moral dilemmas faced by individuals caught between their desires and the turbulent world around them. The narrative stands as a poignant reflection on the human experience during a period of strife and uncertainty, inviting readers to ponder the broader implications of their personal choices within a societal context marked by revolution. Mór Jókai, a prominent Hungarian author, was an ardent supporter of national independence and liberation, themes that profoundly influenced his writing. Born in 1825, Jókai witnessed firsthand the socio-political struggles of his nation, which often informed the emotional depth and historical context of his work. His life experiences and commitment to Hungarian culture resonate throughout "The Day of Wrath," making the novel not only a work of fiction but also a significant commentary on national identity and resilience. This powerful narrative is recommended for those interested in Hungarian literature and the exploration of human agency amidst historical turmoil. Jókai's ability to conjure vivid characters and scenarios, while also engaging with broader themes of freedom and societal change, makes "The Day of Wrath" an essential read for both scholars and general readers alike. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
The Day of Wrath
Table of Contents
Introduction
A community’s reckoning tests the fragile boundary between justice and vengeance, forcing private consciences to meet the harsh glare of public judgment. In The Day of Wrath, Mór Jókai channels this conflict into a concentrated narrative energy that feels both intimate and grand. Without relying on foreknowledge of specific events, the book signals its concerns from the outset: how fear accelerates, how outrage organizes itself, and how individuals navigate the press of collective emotion. The tension lies less in spectacle than in moral pressure, as Jókai guides readers through a landscape where choices narrow, motives harden, and every decision echoes beyond the self.
Written by Mór Jókai (1825–1904), a leading figure of nineteenth-century Hungarian literature, The Day of Wrath belongs to the broad, popular tradition of the historical and social novel. Jókai’s fiction is renowned for blending vivid scene-painting with romantic intensity and civic observation, and this work bears those hallmarks. While details of setting unfold within the tale, the ambience is unmistakably Central European in texture—towns and countryside shaped by shifting authorities, customs, and loyalties. Composed in the cultural climate that produced Jókai’s prolific oeuvre, the novel partakes of the century’s fascination with upheaval, reform, and the testing of communal bonds.
The premise offers a spoiler-safe promise: a society under strain moves toward a decisive moment when grievances, rumors, and long-harbored tensions must be answered. Rather than chart a single-issue dispute, Jókai orchestrates converging pressures—personal honor, public duty, and the uneasy sway of emotion over reason. Readers can expect an experience that alternates between closely observed interpersonal scenes and broader civic tableaux, the mood shifting from uneasy calm to mounting urgency. The voice is confident and expansive, the style attuned to moral nuance, and the atmosphere grows denser as the questions sharpen: what is owed to the law, what is owed to conscience, and who speaks for justice.
Among the book’s principal themes are the ethics of judgment, the danger of collective wrath, and the fraught balance between mercy and accountability. Jókai probes how authority is claimed and contested, how memory shapes verdicts, and how fear can masquerade as certainty. He is attentive to the dignity and limits of institutions, but equally to the human susceptibilities that inhabit them. The title signals an occasion of reckoning; the narrative explores what kind of reckoning is worthy of a community, and at what cost. The result is a study of responsibility that refuses easy absolutes, inviting readers to weigh not only outcomes, but the means by which they are reached.
Stylistically, Jókai’s strengths appear in panoramic description, spirited dialogue, and an oratorical cadence that heightens moral stakes without losing sight of flesh-and-blood complexity. He favors contrasts—public squares and private chambers, calm deliberation and sudden outcry—to trace how sentiments migrate from whispers to proclamations. Moments of levity or irony temper the severity, a familiar Jókai technique that deepens rather than dilutes seriousness. The pacing is deliberate yet steadily tightening, with scenes that accumulate resonance through refrains of image and idea. Readers encounter a voice that courts the theatrical while anchoring itself in the everyday textures of work, ritual, and social negotiation.
The Day of Wrath remains pertinent for contemporary readers because it examines how communities handle fear, disagreement, and the temptation to simplify complex truths. It asks what happens when procedures, however imperfect, are tested by passion, and when private scruples collide with public demand. In an age attentive to polarization and the ethics of accountability, Jókai’s questions feel freshly immediate: How do we discern credible testimony? What constitutes proportionate response? How do we honor victims without abandoning fairness? The novel’s emotional pull lies in showing that decisions made under pressure carry long shadows, shaping not only outcomes but the moral memory of a society.
Approached as both story and ethical inquiry, this novel rewards patience and reflection. Readers who attend to its shifting registers—intimate and panoramic, skeptical and sympathetic—will find a work that complicates certainty while sustaining narrative momentum. It offers the pleasures of historical atmosphere and the gravity of civic meditation, without requiring prior expertise in the period. Entering The Day of Wrath is to enter a laboratory of judgment, where character and community are refined in the heat of crisis. What endures is not a lesson dictated from above, but the felt experience of choosing under strain, and the responsibility that follows.
Synopsis
Set in an Upper Hungarian county in the early nineteenth century, The Day of Wrath opens with a calm portrait of provincial society poised on the edge of crisis. Market towns and scattered villages, inhabited by gentry, peasants, artisans, and Jewish traders, form a fragile coexistence bound by habit and hierarchy. Into this world comes the rumor of a deadly sickness moving along distant roads. The county doctor urges vigilance, the magistrates debate measures, a conscientious priest counsels charity, and a young noblewoman proves unexpectedly resourceful. Jókai stages these perspectives side by side, establishing a community in which order depends on trust that is beginning to fray.
News hardens into fact as cases appear across the borderlands. Authorities post guards, restrict travel, and consider cordons; such steps, meant to protect, also deepen fear. Whispers spread more quickly than notices, and the countryside listens to both. A charismatic itinerant agitator interprets the danger as a plot by officials and outsiders, offering simpler explanations than medical warnings. The doctor works to explain contagion and hygiene, but his language clashes with longstanding folk beliefs. The county assembly weighs the costs of enforcement against unrest, while household conversations turn toward provisions, prayer, and escape. An air of impending reckoning gathers over fields and lanes.
The first local deaths mark a stark transition from anxiety to alarm. The doctor, worn by sleepless calls, rallies a small circle committed to care and order, among them the parish priest and the young noblewoman whose practical courage steadies patients and bystanders alike. County officers try to standardize responses, but uneven capacity and mixed loyalties complicate their plans. Meanwhile, rumors of poisoned wells and malicious strangers lodge in frightened minds, particularly where grief seeks someone to blame. Scenes of shuttered inns, guarded springs, and shuttered chapels show a society tightening inward, even as messengers and medicines continue to traverse contested roads.
Organized agitation takes shape in tavern corners and roadside gatherings. Emblems and signs circulate, passwords are tested, and a new calendar of promised vengeance is whispered: a day will come to cleanse the land. Some minor officials hedge, unwilling to alienate neighbors; others hold firm and become targets. The doctor’s calls intersect with private dilemmas, as families weigh duty against safety and affection against suspicion. A cautious friendship grows into mutual resolve between the physician and the young woman, mirrored by the priest’s steady ministry among the dying. Jókai’s narrative knits personal threads to public tremors, foreshadowing a surge that will test every bond.
When the long-brewing storm breaks, it does so in a rush of noise, movement, and heat. Bells and horns gather crowds that move under banners of anger, torches reflecting in well buckets and windowpanes. The county seat braces as processions roll in from hamlets, demanding culprits and confessions that do not exist. The doctor and his allies improvise refuges for the sick and the threatened, ferrying water and words as defenses. Houses are searched, carts overturned, and records seized in a frantic theater of proof-seeking. The narrative tightens to immediate choices under pressure, tracing how fragile norms collapse in the push of a crowd.
Amid sieges and standoffs, acts of stark cruelty and unexpected mercy appear side by side. The priest steps between assailants and victims with only his stole and voice, while the young noblewoman undertakes a perilous errand that may tip a balance. The doctor confronts leaders inflamed by certainty, arguing for patience where panic seeks verdicts. Fires throw moving shadows across walls, and hastily locked doors become thin borders between safety and exposure. Jókai layers crowd scenes with quiet interiors, showing fear’s reach into kitchens and sickrooms. Choices made in minutes carry lasting weight, and the cost of misjudgment mounts with every echoing shout.
Momentum, once seemingly unstoppable, meets its counterforces. Exhaustion, weather, and the arrival of determined authority sift the crowds. Some instigators falter when consequences sharpen; others double down and are isolated. The epidemic’s course, indifferent to slogans, enters a different phase, and practical measures begin to take hold where attention can be reclaimed. The county hall reopens under guard, and a ledger of wrongs and responses starts to fill. Jókai refrains from pausing for pronouncement, instead letting the gradual reassertion of routines—markets, services, patrols—signal that a line has been held. The novel turns from immediate peril toward an exacting, uneven restoration.
In the aftermath, formal inquiries and informal reckonings proceed in tandem. Courts convene, testimonies conflict, and sentences are weighed against circumstances shaped by fear. Some are pardoned, others punished, and many return silently to mending fences and burying their dead. The doctor reflects on what science can promise without trust, and the priest on the work of rebuilding conscience. The young noblewoman’s future, once circumscribed by custom, widens through tested character. Policies on sanitation, communication, and relief acquire clearer contours. The county does not forget; survivors carry forward names and lessons. Jókai closes threads with restraint, letting repaired routines stand for hard-won stability.
The Day of Wrath presents a panorama of society under strain, tracing how disease can expose fissures and how fear, once organized, can rival any contagion. Without lingering on verdicts, the novel emphasizes the peril of demagoguery, the necessity of credible leadership, and the saving power of ordinary courage. Its message favors reason joined to compassion: measures must be explained, enforced, and embodied by people who serve as well as command. Jókai’s narrative flow—calm, apprehension, rupture, and recovery—underscores resilience without romanticizing suffering. In concise episodes, he shows a community learning that trust, once broken, is mended slowly by consistent care and shared responsibility.
Historical Context
Set in the Kingdom of Hungary under Habsburg rule, the narrative unfolds across the tumultuous decades surrounding 1848–1849, when Pest-Buda, county seats, and provincial market towns became theaters of political transformation and civil strife. The time is marked by the Reform Era’s ferment (1825–1848), revolutionary upheaval, war, and the reimposition of imperial control. Social landscapes include noble estates, emergent bourgeois salons, and peasant villages tied to feudal obligations until 1848. The book’s environments—urban printing houses, government offices, barracks, and manorial courts—reflect a multiethnic society (Magyars, Germans, Slovaks, Romanians, Serbs, Jews) negotiating modernity under the pressures of empire, nationalism, and rapid legal change.
The Reform Era (1825–1848) laid the groundwork for crisis. Count István Széchenyi’s 1825 pledge launched the Hungarian Academy of Sciences; diets in Pozsony (Pressburg, now Bratislava) debated serf obligations, taxation, and language policy; and the Law of 1844 made Hungarian the administrative tongue. Lajos Kossuth’s press campaigns energized county assemblies, while Ferenc Deák argued constitutional pragmatism. Industrial and infrastructural projects (bridges, steamships, railways) converged with rising national consciousness. The novel mirrors this incubation: reforming nobles, ambitious burghers, and anxious officials embody competing visions of legality and progress, dramatizing the pre-revolutionary collision between traditional corporate privileges and a modern, civic national state.
The March Days of 1848 in Pest-Buda catalyzed change. On 15 March, the Pilvax circle—young patriots including Sándor Petőfi and Mór Jókai—printed the Twelve Points and Petőfi’s National Song without censorship, rallied crowds at the National Museum, and secured the release of Mihály Táncsics. Emperor Ferdinand V sanctioned the April Laws (11 April 1848), creating a responsible Hungarian ministry under Count Lajos Batthyány and abolishing feudal dues. This watershed—press freedom, civil equality, and ministerial accountability—structures the book’s moral horizon: Jókai’s narrative ethos invokes civic awakening, the power of print, and the simultaneous exhilaration and uncertainty born of abrupt legal revolution.
War followed reform. In September 1848, Ban Josip Jelačić led Croatian forces against Hungary; the National Guard and nascent Honvéd army countered. The Battle of Pákozd (29 September 1848) checked Jelačić; Vienna’s October Uprising, and defeat at Schwechat (30 October), widened the conflict. The court replaced constitutional concessions with arms; martial law spread through counties. The novel’s crises echo mobilization, requisitioning, and provincial alarm as families confront conscription, shifting front lines, and the collapse of predictable authority. It captures the nervous tempo of volunteer battalions, county assemblies becoming war councils, and everyday livelihoods subordinated to the strategic imperatives of survival.
Hungary’s 1849 Spring Campaign reversed fortunes. Under generals like Artúr Görgei and János Damjanich, victories at Hatvan (2 April), Tápióbicske (4 April), Isaszeg (6 April), Vác (10 April), and Nagysalló (19 April) culminated in liberating Buda (21 May). On 14 April 1849, the Debrecen Diet proclaimed independence; Kossuth became Governor-President. Tsar Nicholas I intervened; Ivan Paskevich’s army coordinated with Austrian forces. Surrender at Világos (13 August 1849) ended the war; 13 generals were executed at Arad (6 October), and former PM Lajos Batthyány was shot in Pest the same day. The work’s "day of wrath" motif distills victory’s fragility, civic sacrifice, and the devastating reckoning that followed.
Neoabsolutism (the Bach Era, 1849–1859) imposed centralized rule. Interior Minister Alexander Bach engineered administrative Germanization, a standing gendarmerie, press censorship, and surveillance; the 1855 Concordat strengthened clerical influence; conscription and taxation tightened. County autonomies were curtailed; courts tried political suspects; émigrés scattered from London to Istanbul. Jókai, a revolutionary journalist, experienced hiding, proscription, and later rehabilitation—biographical facts that seep into the book’s atmosphere of suspicion, informants, and coerced loyalty oaths. The narrative’s portrayal of dossiers, confiscations, and muted dissent illuminates how a police state reshaped everyday life and how memory of 1848 persisted as a quiet counter-sovereign.
Social and national questions sharpened the conflict’s edges. The April Laws emancipated serfs, abolishing corvée and tithes, yet compensation and land allocation were uneven, fueling rural tensions. Ethnopolitical clashes escalated: in Transylvania, Romanian forces under Avram Iancu fought Hungarian units amid cycles of massacre in the Apuseni (1848–1849); in southern Hungary, Serb autonomists under Patriarch Rajačić and leaders like Stevan Stratimirović contested control. Economic dislocation, grain shortages, and rumors—echoing earlier cholera panics (1831)—amplified fear. The novel threads these pressures into its conflicts, juxtaposing county notables and village communities, showing how rumor, grievance, and mobilization could turn reformist hope into sectarian "wrath."
As social and political critique, the book interrogates absolutism’s legality and the moral hazards of revolutionary justice. It exposes arbitrary arrests, collective punishment, and the brittleness of rights without institutional guarantees. Class hierarchies—noble privilege, urban wealth, peasant precarity—are weighed against the April Laws’ promise of equality, while ethnic rivalries reveal the limits of a purely majoritarian nationalism. By dramatizing censorship, policing, and economic coercion, it indicts the Bach system; by depicting panic, opportunism, and vengeance, it warns against demagoguery within the revolutionary camp. The narrative advances a civic ethic grounded in rule of law, responsibility, and a sober reckoning with pluralism.
