1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The English Poetic Mind," Charles Williams presents a profound exploration of the intricate relationship between English poetry and its underlying psychological and spiritual dimensions. Williams employs a distinctive literary style that balances rigorous analysis with lyrical prose, drawing upon a vast array of poetic works to illustrate his theories. The book seamlessly intertwines literary criticism with elements of theology and philosophy, situating itself within the context of early 20th-century literature, where the interplay between religion and art was increasingly examined amidst the tumult of modernity. Charles Williams, a pivotal figure of the Inklings alongside J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis, was deeply influenced by his Christian faith and scholarly pursuits in literature and philosophy. His extensive knowledge of metaphysical concepts and the human condition informs the arguments put forth in this book. Williams, who eloquently navigated between the realms of myth, imagination, and reality, draws upon his experiences in literary circles and theological studies to offer a unique perspective that transcends conventional literary analysis. "The English Poetic Mind" is an essential read for those interested in the intersection of literature and spirituality. Williams's insightful dissection of poetic intention and the psychological machinations behind creativity will captivate scholars and casual readers alike. Engaging with this work enriches one's appreciation of English poetry and provokes thoughtful reflection on the broader implications of the poetic experience. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
The English Poetic Mind
Table of Contents
Introduction
At its core, The English Poetic Mind asks how English poetry thinks, tracing the ways vision, argument, and feeling interweave across centuries to make form a mode of knowledge, language a medium of discovery, and tradition a living energy rather than a museum, so that the reader meets not a catalog of authors but a mind at work—restless, exacting, and humane—clarifying what it means for a culture to imagine, judge, remember, and hope through the disciplined freedoms of verse.
Charles Williams (1886–1945), a British poet, novelist, and critic, offers this study as a work of literary criticism rather than a chronological survey. First published in the early 1930s, it belongs to the interwar moment when writers reassessed the relation between heritage and experiment, authority and innovation. The “setting” of the book is the tradition of English verse itself: a multilingual, evolving field shaped by history but not confined to it. Williams approaches that field with scholarly restraint and a poet’s intuition, proposing that the habits of English poetry can be understood as a distinctive, intelligible cast of mind.
The experience the book offers is meditative and analytic at once. Williams’s voice is formal, probing, and hospitable to complexity, attentive to the sound and weight of words as much as to ideas. He proceeds by close attention to diction, metaphor, rhythm, and structural pattern, relating these to wider questions without turning the inquiry into doctrine or dogma. The mood is earnest rather than combative, confident that description, patiently pursued, will yield insight. Readers can expect a sustained argument that values exactness and balance, preferring demonstration through example and definition to rhetorical flourish or polemic.
Central themes include the interplay of imagination and reason, the mutual testing of beauty and truth, and the ways poetic form disciplines emotion into clarity. Williams is interested in continuity across periods alongside the genuine novelty of each generation’s idiom. He considers how symbols carry pressure from experience to expression, and how shared language permits both individuality and participation in a larger conversation. Ethical and metaphysical questions are never far away, not as imposed frameworks but as issues summoned by the poems themselves: how a line persuades, how an image bears meaning, how judgment and delight coexist.
Methodologically, the book moves by comparison and recurrence, noticing patterns that reappear under different historical conditions. Williams treats technical matters—cadence, stress, imagery—not as ornaments but as ways of thinking that poetry makes audible. He resists reducing poems to paraphrase or biography, instead showing how interpretation depends on attending to formal decisions and their consequences. The result is a criticism that joins precision to amplitude: particular enough to honor the grain of language, roomy enough to register the tradition’s variety. Readers are invited to test these claims against their own encounters with poems, sharpening taste through disciplined attention.
The English Poetic Mind remains pertinent to contemporary readers who navigate abundant text and competing theories of meaning. Its emphasis on careful reading models an alternative to both suspicion without sympathy and enthusiasm without evidence. By framing poetry as a site where knowledge is tried, clarified, and sometimes transformed, the book invites reflection on cultural memory, civic imagination, and the responsibilities of interpretation. It speaks to classrooms and independent readers alike, offering tools to ask better questions about what poems do, how they persuade, and why their forms matter in moments of crisis as well as in ordinary time.
Approached slowly, Williams’s study rewards patience with a sharpened ear and a steadier sense of orientation. It offers a rigorous but companionable guide to reading, one that treats readers as partners in inquiry rather than as spectators of conclusions. Those new to English poetry will find a framework for attentive engagement; those more experienced will gain clarifying language for intuitions long felt. The promise is not exhaustive coverage but heightened discernment: to recognize how the resources of English verse—sound, image, argument, and pattern—compose a way of thinking that continues to challenge, delight, and instruct.
Synopsis
Charles Williams’s The English Poetic Mind surveys how English poets have imagined the relation of feeling, intellect, and order across the tradition. Beginning with a statement of purpose and method, Williams defines the “poetic mind” as a disciplined imagination that seeks coherence between personal passion and communal meaning. He reads poems for recurring images, habits of thought, and inherited forms, emphasizing continuity rather than rupture. The book proceeds historically while drawing thematic lines—praise, courtesy, and exchange—through successive periods. Williams’s guiding claim is descriptive: English poetry repeatedly strives to render experience intelligible by placing private emotion within shared symbols of order.
Williams first sketches medieval foundations, where courtly forms and Christian doctrine intersect. He notes how allegory provided a framework for moral and spiritual reflection, shaping the poet’s task as both celebrant and analyst of value. Attention falls on Chaucer as a decisive organizer of English poetic resources—registering human complexity with social tact and moral measure. Ballads and devotional verse show early patterns of praise and communal memory. The medieval imagination, as Williams presents it, prizes courtesy as a mode of relation and articulates love within an ordered cosmos, establishing habits of form and thought that later poets adapt rather than abandon.
Turning to the Renaissance, Williams presents Spenser and Shakespeare as consolidators of imaginative order under pressure of enlarged experience. Spenser’s epic allegory offers a grammar of virtues, treating love and polity as mutually informing. Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets dramatize the testing of desire against truth, probing how language both reveals and deceives. The period’s confidence in form fosters experiment without discarding measure. Williams emphasizes how courtly tradition is reworked into dramatic and epic structures, allowing the poets to negotiate individual passion alongside civic responsibility. The English poetic mind here refines its balance between imaginative expansion and ethical intelligibility.
With the Metaphysicals, Williams identifies a renewed intimacy between intellect and feeling. Donne, Herbert, and Crashaw deploy wit, paradox, and conceit to bind sensuous detail to theological speculation. The poems explore union—of body and soul, time and eternity—through daring analogies that insist on coherence amid complexity. Devotional verse makes praise exacting and analytic, while love poetry tests fidelity through intellectual rigor. Williams treats this phase as an intensification rather than a deviation: inherited forms are made tensile enough to hold thought’s urgency. The metaphysical habit shows the English poetic mind accommodating argument without sacrificing lyric immediacy.
Williams then considers Milton and the Augustans as exponents of formal order under public responsibility. Milton’s epic frames freedom, obedience, and justice within a vast theological design, aligning private will with a providential scheme. Dryden and Pope refine decorum, clarity, and satire to measure conduct by shared standards. In their work, urbanity and critique function as instruments of cohesion, articulating the terms of conversation in a populous culture. Williams reads these poets as maintaining the tradition’s core: imagination disciplined by rule, praise tempered by judgment. The city—social life in its complexity—becomes both subject and setting for poetic intelligence.
Addressing Romantic transformations, Williams traces how Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, and Keats relocate order within the perceiving mind and the living world. Wordsworth’s attention to ordinary experience establishes inward law; Coleridge’s distinction between symbol and fancy articulates a theory of organic form. Keats advances a poise before uncertainty, while Shelley pursues ideal propulsion. Williams stresses continuity: the Romantics expand the sphere of praise to include nature’s processes and consciousness itself, without abandoning the aim of coherence. Their experiments amplify rather than sever tradition, testing whether personal vision can sustain communicable truth and thus remain a civic as well as private art.
Victorian developments, in Williams’s account, apply inherited forms to an era of doubt and industrial change. Tennyson negotiates elegy and faith; Browning examines personality through dramatic monologue; Arnold treats culture as a humanist discipline; and Hopkins invents accentual rhythm to register inscape. The poets confront fragmentation with renewed technical resource, transforming crisis into pattern. Love, duty, and community persist as central concerns, though their grounds are probed and questioned. Williams underlines how Victorian craft safeguards communicability: form is the medium by which private trial becomes shareable meaning. The English poetic mind adapts by intensifying attention rather than relinquishing measure.
In modern poetry, Williams notes the return of mythic frameworks and a conscious relation to tradition. Yeats constructs symbolic systems to contain personal and national histories; Eliot theorizes impersonality and practices allusive montage to recover order from cultural debris. Techniques of fragmentation serve an ordering impulse, not nihilism, as poets revisit metaphysical wit and devotional concentration in new idioms. The modern city reappears as emblem of plurality and trial. For Williams, this phase exemplifies the mind’s resilience: innovation proceeds through dialogue with the past, and the poem remains a social act—an exercise of courtesy, exactness, and shared attention.
Williams concludes by defining the English poetic mind as a durable habit of reconciliation: it joins passion to measure, individuality to tradition, and perception to value. Across periods, poets seek forms that make experience answerable within a common language. Recurring motifs—praise, courtesy, exchange, and civic imagery—signal a commitment to relation over isolation. The book’s final emphasis is descriptive and integrative: English poetry changes by reinterpreting its own resources. The central message is that continuity and innovation are complementary, and that the poet’s office is to find, within shifting circumstances, the right order whereby feeling becomes intelligible and shareable.
Historical Context
Composed and published in the early 1930s by Oxford University Press in its London headquarters at Amen House, The English Poetic Mind arose from the interwar climate of Britain. The nation was still reckoning with the human cost of the First World War and the economic strains that culminated in the 1929 crash and the National Government of 1931. London’s intellectual life oscillated between anxiety and renewal as continental authoritarianism gathered force. Williams, a senior editor steeped in theology and history, surveyed centuries of English experience to probe how the imagination thinks about order, justice, and community. Though not a narrative work, it is situated in a city and decade where historical memory and present crisis pressed insistently upon criticism.
The Tudor Reformation forms a central historical backdrop. Henry VIII’s Act of Supremacy (1534) severed papal authority, while the Dissolution of the Monasteries (1536–1541) redistributed vast lands, reshaping parish life and charity. The Pilgrimage of Grace (1536) signaled northern resistance, and the Elizabethan Settlement (1559) stabilized worship under a national church. England’s defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 confirmed a Protestant identity and maritime confidence. These changes reordered power, property, and conscience in towns from London to York. In The English Poetic Mind, Williams treats this era’s imagery of kingship, sacrament, law, and obedience as the matrix through which English thought learned to balance inward conviction with public polity.
The Stuart crisis and the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (English Civil Wars, 1642–1651) tested sovereignty and allegiance. After the Petition of Right (1628) challenged prerogative, conflict erupted; key moments included Edgehill (1642), Marston Moor (1644), and Naseby (1645). Charles I was executed in 1649; a Commonwealth followed, then the Protectorate (1653–1659), before the Restoration of 1660. The Act of Uniformity (1662) and Test Acts (1673) tried to regulate religious and civic loyalty. These upheavals forged a political vocabulary of covenant, resistance, and conscience. Williams reads the civil and ecclesial crisis as decisive for the English mental world he analyzes, where the claims of divine order and parliamentary law are held in a charged tension.
The Revolution of 1688–1689 established constitutional monarchy, codified by the Bill of Rights (1689) and framed by the Toleration Act (1689) and Act of Settlement (1701). The Bank of England (1694) and fiscal–military state altered the nation’s capacity for war and credit. The Acts of Union (1707) created Great Britain, integrating Scottish institutions into a shared polity. Coffeehouses and a rapidly expanding press cultivated a public sphere conversant with law, commerce, and debate. Williams links this settlement to a maturing English understanding of contract, oath, and civil trust, showing how images of law and measured liberty became embedded in the moral imagination he traces.
Industrialization from the late eighteenth century transformed labor, space, and time. Steam power (improved by James Watt’s patents in 1769), cotton mills in Lancashire, and ironworks in the Midlands drew populations into new cities; Manchester grew into a metropolis with over 180,000 inhabitants by the 1840s. Social conflicts followed: Luddite machine-breaking (1811–1816); the Peterloo Massacre (1819), where at least 15 died and hundreds were injured; the Great Reform Act (1832) expanded the electorate and abolished rotten boroughs; the New Poor Law (1834) reorganized relief; Chartist petitions (1839, 1842, 1848) gathered over a million signatures demanding universal male suffrage. Williams’s emphasis on justice and the commonweal dialogues with these facts, examining how English thought wrestled with personality, duty, and the claims of the crowd and the state.
The French Revolution (1789) and the subsequent wars (Britain entered in 1793) reshaped British politics and surveillance. The Reign of Terror (1793–1794) and the Napoleonic ascendancy intensified fears of radicalism. Domestic measures included suspensions of habeas corpus (1794) and restrictions on assembly (notably the Seditious Meetings and related acts). Naval supremacy culminated at Trafalgar (1805), while the long continental struggle ended at Waterloo (1815). These decades sharpened debates over liberty, authority, and national mission. In The English Poetic Mind, Williams construes the English habit of mind in this period as mediating zeal with order, reading public rhetoric about right, sovereignty, and sacrifice as categories that disciplined imaginative power.
From empire to world war, the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries forced a reckoning with power and loss. The Indian Uprising (1857) yielded direct Crown rule (1858); the Boer War (1899–1902) exposed imperial strain; Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) unsettled inherited teleologies; education reforms (1870) widened literacy. The First World War (1914–1918) brought approximately 886,000 British military dead, with battles such as the Somme (1916) emblematic of industrial slaughter. Postwar, the Representation of the People Act (1918) expanded suffrage; the General Strike (May 1926) mobilized about 1.7 million workers; Britain left the gold standard in September 1931 amid mass unemployment. Published in 1932, Williams’s work answers these shocks by recovering older languages of charity, vocation, and lawful community as counterweights to anomie and mass politics.
As a social and political critique, the book interrogates how a community imagines justice in the face of state centralization, economic dislocation, and ideological spectacle. Williams exposes the era’s wounds—class fracture, instrumental views of persons, and the seductions of collective will—by returning to historical patterns of kingship, covenant, and mutual obligation. He implicitly rebukes the reduction of culture to utility and the crowd to numbers, insisting on responsibility nested within lawful freedom. By drawing on England’s contested past—Reformation conscience, civil conflict, constitutional settlement, industrial reform, and war—he lays bare the modern tendency to mistake power for order, and he commends a polity shaped by charity, equity, and restraint.
The English Poetic Mind
PREFACE
The following essays are based on two convictions: (1) that Troilus and Cressida is of a great deal more importance in a study of Shakespeare than has generally been allowed, (2) that the central crisis of Troilus is in direct poetic relation to the culminating crisis in Wordsworth’s account of his own history in the Prelude. From these convictions I went on to consider whether that crisis had any parallels in the work of the other English poets, and whether it might, not unreasonably, be related to the Satan of Milton, compared with the Nightingale of Keats, and contrasted with the Lancelot of Tennyson. Upon this subject it would have been possible to write a book either of five hundred or of two hundred pages; I chose two hundred with equal reluctance and decision.
I have called it the English Poetic Mind rather than the English Poetic Genius, because the word genius, in that context, might be supposed to have reference rather to ‘English’ than to ‘Poetic’; to allude to the feelings which (as Sir Arthur Quiller Couch has suggested) should be aroused in us when we stand by the tomb of the Black Prince in Canterbury Cathedral rather than to those which are aroused by the reading of Henry V. With the patriotism of Shakespeare and Milton and the rest I have nothing to do; only with their poetry. But to omit the geographical limitation altogether would have been too bold; the present title sounds more like the tentative suggestion which the book is meant to offer.
Even so, all the English poets are not here: Chaucer, Spenser, Dryden, for example. I can only plead that two hundred pages are better than five hundred, and that to do more than is here done would have meant the five hundred: it would have had to be a full volume with notes and appendices and longer quotations and digressions and defences and explanations all complete. Aristotle on tragedy and De Quincey on power and Coleridge on poetry and everybody on Shakespeare and almost everybody on Keats would have had to come in. To the general critical intelligence of our own times I owe of course a profound debt, poorly as this study may seem to pay any of it; to the critical authority of the past a proper obedience. But on the central question of Troilus I am not conscious of owing any particular debt at all. Something of the possibility I tried to put into verse in my Myth of Shakespeare; it is here defined in prose.
Of one fact I am a little proud. The suggestions made here are quite unexclusive. Shakespeare, Milton, and Wordsworth may have been moved by any personal cause or aiming at any moral or metaphysical purpose conceivable—it does not matter, I have been concerned with the poetry only as it exists, and with its interrelation. Even the prose statements which the poets themselves made about their poetry are omitted. Criticism has done so much to illuminate the poets, and yet it seems, with a few exceptions, both of the past and the present, still not sufficiently to relate the poets to the poets, to explain poetry by poetry. Yet in the end what other criterion have we? Wordsworth’s poetry is vii likely to explain Shakespeare’s poetry much better than we can, because poetry is a thing sui generis. It explains itself by existing. There has been a great deal too much talking of what the poets mean. They also are mortal; they also express themselves badly sometimes; they also sometimes fail to discover quite finally the exact scope of their desire. We can enjoy ourselves talking about them, of course; the multitudinous printed chat of generations lies behind and around us. But criticism—is it being stupid to say that in the end the poets themselves must do that also for us? We know so little unless they tell us; we feel as they direct us; we are disordered and astray unless they govern us. Poetry is a good game—let us take it lightly. But it is also ‘liberty and power’—let us take it seriously. Ad maiorem poetarum gloriam—there is but one ascription more worthy than that, and in the tradition of Christendom it was amid a cloud of songs as well as of seraphs that the Divine Word accepted incarnation.
C. W.
I A NOTE ON GREAT POETRY
The word ‘poetry’ is generally used in one of two senses. It either means the whole mass of amusing and delightful stuff written in verse, or it is restricted to those greater lines, stanzas, or poems which are comparatively rare even in the work of the great poets. There is no certain method of deciding on these last, except by personal experience (which is not quite reliable) or by authority—the judgement of sensitive readers over many years. There is no way of discovering how the thing is done, nor exactly how a great line produces its effect. But it is to some extent possible to see what the difference is between the lesser kind of verse and the greater.
Wordsworth in the Prelude (1, 149-57), defines three things as necessary for the writing of poetry. They are (i) ‘the vital soul’, (ii) ‘general truths’, (iii) ‘external things—Forms, images’. With these possessions in himself he feels prepared for his own ‘arduous work’. The distinction exists for the reader as well. The third necessity (‘aids Of less regard’) is an obvious part of most poetry: it includes metaphors, similes, comparisons; even the story, and the persons in narrative or dramatic verse or the hypothetical speaker, the individual poet, in lyric. These things are ‘needful to build up a poet’s praise’, and at their most exquisite they play an important part in the whole. But the greatest poetry can exist without them. ‘A rose-red city, half as old as Time’ is a lovely line. It stops at being that.
‘General truths’—‘subordinate helpers of the living mind’—on the other hand, though more important, are less reliable aids: for they have a way of pretending to be the living mind, the ‘vital soul’ itself. Some of the poets—Longfellow, Tennyson, Wordsworth himself—appear occasionally to have thought they were writing poetry when they were merely communicating general truths, or what appeared to them to be so. The Excursion, as opposed to the Prelude, gives examples of this; although even the Excursion, if a reader will only accept the conditions it postulates, as he is ready to accept the plot of King Lear, may turn out to be a better poem than is often supposed. Perhaps, however, such a couplet as Hamlet’s yields the best example of general truths, which, adequately expressed, delight us almost as much by rational as by poetic strength—
Imperious Caesar, dead and turned to clay,
Might stop a hole to keep the wind away.
But what then is the ‘vital soul’, without which the forms and images and general truths lack something? It is ‘genius’; it is ‘poetry’. But that takes us no farther. It cannot be merely the relation of labials and gutturals, or the play of stresses and pauses. These are, in another shape, the ‘forms and images’. It cannot be the diction—however exact or unexpected; that is but a general truth. All such things are ‘subordinate helpers of the living mind’, which must itself use them for its own purpose. What does that mind do in Hyperion which it does not do in Horatius? why is Pope a greater poet than Prior or Praed?
Poetry, one way or another, is ‘about’ human experience; there is nothing else that it can be about. But to whatever particular human experience it alludes, it is not that experience. Love poetry is poetry, not love; patriotic poetry is poetry, not patriotism; religious poetry is poetry, not religion. But good poetry does something more than allude to its subject; it is related to it, and it relates us to it.
Through the sad heart of Ruth when, sick for home,
She stood in tears amid the alien corn:
those lines relate us to an experience of exile. They awake in us a sense of exile; more accurately, a realization of our own capacity for enduring exile.
Let this immortal life, where’er it comes,
Walk in a cloud of loves and martyrdoms;
that awakes in us—not certainly love and sacrifice, or love and sacrifice would be easier things than they seem to be. But it does awake a sense that we are capable of love and sacrifice. It reminds us of a certain experience, and by its style it awakes a certain faculty for that experience. We are told of a thing; we are made to feel as if that thing were possible to us; and we are so made to feel it—whatever the thing may be, joy or despair or what not—that our knowledge is an intense satisfaction to us; and this knowledge and this satisfaction are for some period of time complete and final; and this knowledge, satisfaction, and finality are all conveyed through the medium of words, the concord of which is itself a delight to the senses. This sensuous apprehension of our satisfied capacities for some experience or other is poetry of the finest kind.
Lesser verse does not do so much. It may remind us that we have some capacity or other, but it does not communicate a delighted sense of it, nor therefore can it join that sense to the equally delighted sense of words. The Armada is, in its way, an exciting and pleasing piece of writing. But it does not arouse in us a sense of our capacity for staunch patriotism; it excites by reminding us that there is a capacity for staunch patriotism.
Bolingbroke in Richard II[1] talks very beautifully about exile. But we are much more inclined to think as we read, ‘That is how I should like to talk if I were ever exiled’; we are reminded of our capacity for beautifully expressing our grief at exile rather than of our capacity for suffering exile—that is with Ruth more than with Bolingbroke. Horatius confronting Lars Porsena, FitzJames confronting Roderick Dhu, do not convey a sense of man’s capacity for heroism; they at most remind us that man has a capacity for heroism.
Round turned he, as not deigning
Those heathen ranks to see;
Naught spake he to Lars Porsena,
To Sextus naught spake he.
How jolly to behave like that! The pretence of such behaviour is agreeably invoked by those admirable lines. For they are, in their degree, admirable; it is another, and a moral, question how far we allow them to deceive us: they do not try to. They thrill us, and thrills are good, only one cannot live by thrills. But
So spake the Seraph Abdiel, faithful found,
Among the faithless faithful only he;
Among innumerable false unmoved,
Unshaken, unseduced, unterrified.
It would not be so easy to behave like that. Our capacity for heroism is stirred—or at least our desire for, our recognition of, that capacity. But can we desire or recognize something of which we are entirely incapable? ‘Hadst thou not found me, thou couldst not be seeking me’, said Christ to one of the mystics; and the same thing is true of the faculties awakened by poetry.
