1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Quickie Classics
- Kategorie: Abenteuer, Thriller, Horror
- Sprache: Englisch
The King in Yellow (1895) assembles interlinked tales orbiting a banned play whose lines derange readers and stain reality. From the prophetic dystopia of 'The Repairer of Reputations' to 'The Mask,' 'In the Court of the Dragon,' and 'The Yellow Sign,' Chambers blends fin-de-siècle decadence, symbolist imagery, and nascent weird fiction. Borrowing Carcosa and Hastur from Bierce, he crafts opalescent, satiric prose and exquisitely unreliable narrators. Trained as a painter at the École des Beaux-Arts and the Académie Julian, Chambers imported a colorist's eye and Parisian bohemia's artifice into prose. His early magazine work and exposure to the Decadents—and to the vogue of The Yellow Book—inclined him toward masks, morbid elegance, and aesthetic contagion, even as his later career veered toward popular romances. Readers of weird fiction, Decadence, or modern horror will find a seminal blueprint here: intertextual mythmaking, destabilized realities, and the seductive peril of art. For scholars, it rewards study of unreliable narration and fin-de-siècle culture; for general readers, its crystalline dread and rueful wit remain uncannily contemporary. Quickie Classics summarizes timeless works with precision, preserving the author's voice and keeping the prose clear, fast, and readable—distilled, never diluted. Enriched Edition extras: Introduction · Synopsis · Historical Context · Brief Analysis · 4 Reflection Q&As · Editorial Footnotes.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2026
Ähnliche
The King in Yellow (Summarized Edition)
Table of Contents
Introduction
The King in Yellow is about the perilous seduction of art that promises truth while loosening the mind’s grip on reality. Robert W. Chambers’s collection, first published in 1895, occupies a liminal space between decadent fantasy, gothic melancholy, and the nascent weird tale. Its opening movement orbits a notorious play whispered to unmoor anyone who reads it, while later stories soften into romantic reverie and wistful adventure. Through these shifts, a single unease persists: beauty can be both revelation and snare. The book’s disquiet is cumulative rather than explosive, working through suggestion, atmosphere, and the uneasy thrill of ideas that feel dangerously lovely.
Written at the fin de siècle, the collection reflects the era’s fascination with Symbolist moods and Decadent textures, yet it remains distinctly American in its vantage, even when wandering European streets. Chambers sets his tales in bohemian Paris, in a near-future United States glimpsed through anxious prophecy, and in imagined or half-remembered realms that border on the folkloric. Within these spaces, studios, cafés, and narrow churches become thresholds where perception flickers. The result is neither a single continuous narrative nor a miscellany without design, but a suite whose tonal gradations feel deliberate, like movements in a score that grows haunting as it unfolds.
In the early stories, a slim dramatic text circulates like contraband, its pages rumored to illuminate and deform the mind in equal measure; characters who brush against it find their perspectives shifting in ways they cannot reverse. Chambers filters these encounters through intimate first-person accounts, urbane observation, and moments of hallucinatory clarity. The language is ornate but swift, balancing painterly description with clipped, almost journalistic detail. Terror emerges obliquely, in the slippage between public composure and private conviction, and in the suspicion that the world has acquired a second, invisible grammar. The reading experience is heady, unstable, and eerily persuasive.
Running through the book is a preoccupation with masks, names, and performances—how people curate themselves, and how that curation can harden into fate. Art is not merely decorative; it is a tool that shapes attention, and thereby reality, with consequences that range from ecstatic to calamitous. Chambers explores alienation in modern cities, the intoxicating glamour of bohemia, and the fragile border between aesthetic rapture and ethical responsibility. Even where the supernatural remains unspoken, dread accrues from social pressures, obsession, and the seduction of certainty. The result is a study of psychological weather, where a passing mood can topple a life.
Beyond its immediate pleasures, the collection helped define a template for weird fiction by making a fictional book itself the engine of dread, a device that later writers would adapt in myriad forms. Its mingling of art-world detail, dreamlike settings, and carefully managed ambiguity provided an alternative to purely folkloric horror, pointing toward a modern, idea-driven uncanny. Readers will notice how Chambers lets suggestion do the work that monsters often do, and how urbanity and irony coexist with genuine terror. The influence has been diffuse but persistent, echoing in stories that treat information, rather than apparitions, as the most dangerous specter.
For present-day readers, the book feels startlingly current in its intuition that certain texts behave like contagions, spreading through curiosity and accelerating private fixations. Its vision of minds reorganized by what they consume resonates in an age of algorithmic feeds, where aesthetics and ideology intermingle and escalate. Questions about what art owes the world, and what the world owes art, press against every page. The narratives also anticipate debates about unreliable narrators and fractured realities, inviting us to consider how conviction can outpace evidence. Reading it now is to recognize the psychological mechanics of our own information-saturated moment.
Approached as a sequence, the book rewards patience with its tonal evolution: the early tales cultivate dread through implication, while the later pieces turn toward longing, memory, and gentler enchantments that recontextualize the preceding unease. The shift is not a retreat but a reframing, suggesting that the same sensibility capable of doom is also capable of grace. Attentive readers will find subtle motifs—a color, a sign, an air of decadence—reappearing like motifs in music. Taken together, the stories pose a durable question: how much truth can beauty bear before it breaks us, and how much beauty can truth endure.
Synopsis
The King in Yellow (1895) by Robert W. Chambers is a collection of short stories mixing decadent romance, psychological terror, and Parisian bohemian vignettes. The opening tales revolve around a notorious, privately circulated play said to unbalance readers, whose motifs—Carcosa, the Yellow Sign, and a veiled monarch—recur across settings. Subsequent pieces shift toward realism, focusing on artists, lovers, and soldiers in and around Paris. Throughout, Chambers explores how art, desire, and reputation can distort perception, raising questions about authority, sanity, and the seductive power of aesthetic experience. The result is a mosaic of linked atmospheres rather than a single continuous narrative.
The Repairer of Reputations presents an unreliable narrator in a near-future New York, where unusual civic measures and martial pride shadow public life. Recovering from a head injury, he becomes fixated on a secret hierarchy and a mysterious tradesman who hoards damaging information. The banned play enters as a private obsession, read in secluded rooms and cited as proof of hidden authority. Symbols and whispered titles seem to confirm his grand design, yet the story continually invites doubt about memory, motive, and social order. Chambers frames paranoia as both personal pathology and a response to a modern nation reorganizing itself.
In The Mask, the scene shifts to Paris, where a sculptor discovers a chemical solution that transforms living tissue into flawless marble. Among a small circle of artists, the discovery becomes a test of aesthetic purity, temptation, and loyalty. A delicate affection develops and strains existing friendships, while the ominous reputation of the proscribed play lurks in conversation and private libraries. As the miraculous process is demonstrated, the boundary between preservation and annihilation narrows, and characters confront how far they will go to seize beauty or mastery. Chambers intertwines scientific curiosity with fin-de-siècle longing, letting atmosphere carry much of the dread.
In the Court of the Dragon follows a harried narrator who senses persecution while attending Mass, fixating on an organist whose presence spreads from church to streets and dreams. The Yellow Sign centers on a painter and his model, both distressed by nightmares and by a menacing figure associated with a nearby churchyard. In each, the infamous text arises as rumor or talisman, deepening an impression that pattern has eclipsed chance. Characters struggle to distinguish external threat from inward collapse, and the city itself seems complicit, its corridors and courtyards funneling them toward revelation without declaring whether fate or imagination rules.
The Demoiselle d’Ys offers a gentler dislocation: a traveler in Brittany meets a noble household that does not align with present time. Courtly manners and falconry suggest another century, and a fragile attachment forms before chronology reasserts itself. The Prophet’s Paradise appears as a suite of brief prose interludes, meditations on love, pursuit, renunciation, and the illusions of possession. Though these segments are less overtly connected to the play, they extend the book’s preoccupation with symbols that govern behavior. Memory and desire are treated as traps and lures, and past and present mingle, not to solve puzzles but to deepen atmosphere.
The final stories turn to the Quartier Latin and neighboring streets, portraying students, painters, models, and lovers negotiating poverty, pride, and chance. The Street of the Four Winds sketches a solitary artist’s routines and an attachment formed in a moment of kindness. The Street of the First Shell, set during the siege of Paris, examines fear and endurance under bombardment. The Street of Our Lady of the Fields and Rue Barrée trace courtship, jealousy, and restraint within small communities. Violence yields to everyday hazards, yet the earlier preoccupations remain: reputations are brittle, affection is provisional, and art exacts precise, private costs.
Across these varied pieces, Chambers tests how a work of art can act like a contagion, shaping conduct, reframing memory, and insinuating design into coincidence. The banned text functions less as plot device than as atmosphere generator, inviting readers to experience uncertainty firsthand. The book’s invented names and symbols broaden the setting beyond France and America, hinting at an order both alluring and indifferent. While the collection’s tones differ, its concerns cohere around obsession, credibility, and the fragile status of truth in modern life. Its influence endures for the way it marries decadent sensibility to nascent cosmic unease, leaving mysteries intact.
Historical Context
Published in 1895 by F. Tennyson Neely, Robert W. Chambers’s The King in Yellow appeared at the height of the Anglo-American fin de siècle, when transatlantic publishing networks circulated avant‑garde art and fiction. Chambers (1865–1933), a Brooklyn-born illustrator turned writer, assembled a sequence of stories that moved between Paris and New York. The International Copyright Act of 1891 had recently aligned U.S. publishing with British practice, encouraging legitimate reprints and wider markets. Short-story collections flourished in magazines and in single-volume issue. The book’s mixture of cosmopolitan settings and uneasy modernity reflects a moment when art, commerce, and readership rapidly globalized while cultural certainties frayed.
Chambers trained as an artist at the Art Students League of New York and continued his studies in Paris at the Académie Julian, immersing himself in the Belle Époque’s ateliers, cafés, and Salons. The Latin Quarter and Montmartre teemed with students, models, and illustrators who exhibited at the official Salon or the progressive Salon des Indépendants. Cabarets such as Le Chat Noir popularized shadow plays, posters, and symbolist verse. This institutional world—studio critiques, juried exhibitions, and bohemian lodgings—forms the lived backdrop of several tales. By depicting artists’ careers amid prestige and precarity, the book registers the rewards and risks of a commodified, spectacle‑driven art scene.
The 1890s cultivated a Decadent and Symbolist aesthetic across Europe and America. J.-K. Huysmans’s À rebours (1884) and the quarterly The Yellow Book (1894–1897), published by John Lane with Aubrey Beardsley as art editor, made "yellow" a sign of rarefied, sometimes scandalous taste. Oscar Wilde’s 1895 trials, though he never wrote for The Yellow Book, intensified that association and led to Beardsley’s dismissal. At the same time, Max Nordau’s Degeneration (1892; English 1895) condemned Decadence as pathological. Chambers’s recurring motif of dangerous beauty and contagious art speaks directly to this debate, staging tensions between refined modern artistry and fears of moral, even medical, decline.
In the United States, the collection arrived amid the late Gilded Age’s urban expansion and the first stirrings of Progressive reform. New York’s elevated railways, electric lighting, and swelling immigrant districts reshaped everyday life, while Ellis Island opened in 1892 as a federal reception center. The Panic of 1893 deepened unemployment and sharpened class contrasts, animating debates over charity, labor, and municipal corruption. Institutions such as the Art Students League of New York (founded 1875) trained a generation of illustrators competing for magazine work. Chambers’s New York episodes, attentive to studios, streets, and social thresholds, register modernization’s glittering opportunities alongside persistent instability.
Late‑nineteenth‑century science recast the mind as an object of clinical inquiry. George M. Beard popularized "neurasthenia" in 1869; Jean‑Martin Charcot’s lectures at the Salpêtrière in Paris made hysteria and hypnotism central medical spectacles; and S. Weir Mitchell’s widely applied "rest cure" promised nervous patients relief through isolation. Cesare Lombroso and degeneration theorists framed creativity and crime as biological deviation, a view vigorously debated in medical and popular presses. Against this backdrop, the book’s recurring encounters with diagnosis, breakdown, and authority echo contemporary psychiatric language, using the fragility of perception and memory to probe the limits of fin‑de‑siècle confidence in scientific control.
Debates over media influence were vigorous in the 1890s. In Britain, the Lord Chamberlain’s office still licensed stage plays, while in the United States the 1873 Comstock Act targeted "obscene" materials sent through the mails. Simultaneously, mass‑circulation newspapers under Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst expanded with vivid illustrations and sensational reporting, soon labeled "yellow journalism." Critics worried that lurid texts could excite imitation or corrupt taste, a concern voiced from pulp thrillers to avant‑garde periodicals. The collection’s fixation on a perilous book and its theatrical aura taps these controversies, dramatizing how print and performance might transgress, police, or remake social norms.
American politics in the decade also pulsed with conflict and ambition. Labor confrontations such as the Haymarket affair (1886), the Homestead Strike (1892), and the Pullman Strike (1894) unsettled public order, while immigration restriction and nativist agitation reshaped national rhetoric. Expansionists read Alfred Thayer Mahan’s The Influence of Sea Power upon History (1890) and argued for a stronger navy and a global posture. Intellectuals debated Frederick Jackson Turner’s 1893 "frontier thesis" and the fate of national character after continental expansion. When the book imagines altered civic rituals and authority, it channels these anxieties, reflecting concerns about control, loyalty, and the costs of modernization.
Chambers drew on an American Gothic lineage that included Edgar Allan Poe and Ambrose Bierce; Bierce’s 1886 tale "An Inhabitant of Carcosa" furnished a name that Chambers repurposed with new menace. The book’s early stories later won notice from H. P. Lovecraft, who praised their atmosphere in his 1927 essay Supernatural Horror in Literature, and they became touchstones for twentieth‑century weird fiction. Yet the collection remains indelibly a document of the 1890s: it blends Parisian bohemia, New York modernity, and fin‑de‑siècle decadence to interrogate how art, media, and authority shape experience, registering both the allure and the instability of its age.
