Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
- Herausgeber: Musaicum Books
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
Oscar Wilde's 'The Miscellaneous Writings of Oscar Wilde' is a collection of essays, poems, and plays that showcase his wit, humor, and commentary on Victorian society. Wilde's literary style is characterized by clever wordplay, sharp satire, and a keen eye for social norms. This collection provides a glimpse into the mind of one of the most influential writers of the late 19th century, highlighting Wilde's versatility as a writer and his ability to engage with a wide range of topics. The essays touch on themes of aesthetics, morality, and the role of art in society, while the poems and plays showcase Wilde's talent for storytelling and his unique perspective on life. Readers will be captivated by Wilde's sharp observations and timeless wit, making this collection a must-read for fans of classic literature and those interested in the cultural landscape of Victorian England. Oscar Wilde's personal experiences and his keen observations of society undoubtedly influenced his writing in 'The Miscellaneous Writings of Oscar Wilde'. Wilde's own struggles with societal expectations, his unconventional lifestyle, and his eventual downfall due to a public scandal all find echoes in the themes and characters of his works. By delving into this collection, readers will gain a deeper understanding of Wilde's complex personality and the literary genius that set him apart from his contemporaries. Whether you are a fan of Wilde's iconic works or new to his writing, 'The Miscellaneous Writings of Oscar Wilde' offers a comprehensive look at the mind of a literary giant and is sure to leave a lasting impression on all who delve into its pages. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A comprehensive Introduction outlines these selected works' unifying features, themes, or stylistic evolutions. - The Author Biography highlights personal milestones and literary influences that shape the entire body of writing. - A Historical Context section situates the works in their broader era—social currents, cultural trends, and key events that underpin their creation. - A concise Synopsis (Selection) offers an accessible overview of the included texts, helping readers navigate plotlines and main ideas without revealing critical twists. - A unified Analysis examines recurring motifs and stylistic hallmarks across the collection, tying the stories together while spotlighting the different work's strengths. - Reflection questions inspire deeper contemplation of the author's overarching message, inviting readers to draw connections among different texts and relate them to modern contexts. - Lastly, our hand‐picked Memorable Quotes distill pivotal lines and turning points, serving as touchstones for the collection's central themes.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1059
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Ähnliche
The Miscellaneous Writings of Oscar Wilde
Published by
Books
Table of Contents
Introduction
The Miscellaneous Writings of Oscar Wilde gathers the author’s shorter prose, criticism, lectures, letters, and aphorisms into a single compass, offering a counterpoint to his celebrated dramas and tales. Collected here are arguments, reveries, and public addresses in which Wilde tests ideas about beauty, ethics, history, and society. The aim is not to present a single genre in isolation but to show the breadth of his non‑fictional and hybrid forms: dialogic essays, scholarly studies, pieces of journalism, travel impressions, prose poems, and personal letters. Read together, these writings trace a coherent intellectual life, revealing how performance, principle, and personality converge in Wilde’s art of thinking aloud.
At the center of the collection stand the aesthetic dialogues and essays: The Decay of Lying, The Critic as Artist, and The Truth of Masks. In these works Wilde treats conversation as an instrument of inquiry, using paradox to expose received opinion and to defend the autonomy of art. The Decay of Lying advances a playful yet rigorous brief for imagination over mere fact; The Critic as Artist elevates criticism as a creative act; The Truth of Masks considers theatrical costuming as interpretation. Their shared mode is urbane dialectic, their shared lesson that style is a form of thought and a means of freedom.
Wilde’s social philosophy finds its boldest statement in The Soul of Man under Socialism, a sustained argument for individual development secured by social arrangements that release, rather than constrain, creative life. He links material conditions to spiritual possibility, insisting that the organization of society affects the forms of art and the scope of personality. The essay’s method is polemical but lyrical, joining practical propositions to speculative vistas. Placed beside his aesthetic criticism, it shows that his advocacy of art’s independence never excludes concern for justice; instead, he presents individualism and community as mutually enabling when founded on dignity, leisure, and imaginative sympathy.
Pen, Pencil and Poison — A Study in Green and London Models draw Wilde into the margins of the art world, where beauty and commerce, morality and reputation, keep uneasy company. The former reconstructs the career of a draftsman entangled with crime, balancing fascination with ethical scrutiny. The latter observes the profession of artists’ models, attending to the economies of posing, the contingencies of taste, and the making of public and private images. Together they reveal Wilde’s eye for the social textures surrounding art, and his capacity to measure allure without romanticizing it, judgment without forgetting the human scale on which judgments fall.
In The Rise of Historical Criticism Wilde turns to intellectual history, tracing how methods of inquiry themselves become objects of study. The essay reflects his classical training and his interest in the genealogy of ideas, surveying shifts in how scholars assemble evidence and narrate the past. The English Renaissance of Art complements this perspective by charting a reawakening of taste and thought, describing artistic revival as a renewal of sensibility and technique. Read in concert, these pieces show Wilde thinking historically about criticism and critically about history, locating artistic change within wider currents of education, scholarship, and cultural self-understanding.
The practical sphere of design and domestic aesthetics is addressed across House Decoration, The Decorative Arts, The House Beautiful, Art and the Handicraftsman, and Lecture to Art Students. These pieces, often associated with Wilde’s public speaking, translate aesthetic principles into guidance for makers, students, and householders. He argues for unity of design, integrity of materials, and the ethical value of well-made things. He treats the home as a site of education, the workshop as a school of honesty, and the classroom as a rehearsal for delighted labor. Throughout, he affirms that beauty is not an ornament to life but a condition of its fullest exercise.
Two brief collections of aphoristic writing, Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young and A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the Over-Educated, distill Wilde’s paradoxical method into crystalline forms. These compact sentences unsettle habit and provoke reconsideration, turning commonplaces inside out to reveal neglected possibilities. Their targets include pedantry, prudery, and utilitarian narrowness; their instrument is wit that enforces attention by surprise. Read beside the longer essays, the aphorisms act as portable batteries of thought, charging conversation and conduct with flashes of irony and resolve, and reminding us that compression can be as rigorous as argument.
Poems in Prose presents Wilde’s most concentrated experiments in symbolic narrative: short parabolic pieces in which gesture and atmosphere carry philosophical weight. The prose is rhythmic and incantatory, the scenes dreamlike yet pointed, often drawing on scriptural or legendary tones to ask what mercy, justice, and love demand. These fables situate the ethical within the aesthetic, not by preaching but by staging moments where perception changes. Their presence in this collection emphasizes Wilde’s conviction that criticism and creation are companions, and that the border between essay and tale can dissolve into a single act of imaginative clarification.
The epistolary voice appears at two distinct registers. De Profundis is an extended letter of spiritual and artistic self-examination, composed under conditions that clarify and test conviction. It measures success and failure by an inner standard, attending to suffering as a teacher of humility and compassion. Oscar Wilde’s Letter to Robert Browning is slighter in scale but no less revealing, a public expression of admiration that illuminates Wilde’s debts and affinities. Taken together, these letters show a writer who could turn correspondence into literature, uniting candor with poise and personal address with general meditation.
Personal Impressions of America records observations gathered in the course of travel, where Wilde contemplates the energies and contradictions of a modern nation. He notes the scale of its landscapes and enterprises, the theater of public life, and the appetite for novelty that both invigorates and unsettles. The piece complements the lectures on decoration and design, since it treats manners, architecture, and commerce as expressions of a society’s imagination. It also underscores a recurring feature of Wilde’s method: to treat encounters with places and people as occasions for testing principles, adjusting emphasis, and refining standards without abandoning them.
Across these various genres—dialogues, essays, lectures, letters, prose poems, and journalistic studies—certain themes recur. Wilde explores the relation between art and truth, frequently insisting that artifice can reveal realities that literalism obscures. He examines the role of the critic as creator, the theater as laboratory of interpretation, the home as a moral artwork, and the self as a performance that aims at sincerity. His style is marked by cadence, antithesis, and epigram, yet beneath the glitter lies patience with complexity and sympathy for vulnerability. The result is a body of writing that treats taste as ethics in practice and freedom as a cultivated form.
The lasting significance of Wilde’s miscellaneous writings lies in their ability to convene disparate conversations—about beauty and justice, scholarship and spectacle, craft and conscience—within a single, recognizable voice. They have helped shape modern aesthetic theory, expanded the scope of cultural criticism, and refreshed debates about the value of work, the claims of the individual, and the uses of pleasure. This collection invites readers to follow the arc of a mind that trusted its own play, and to encounter a writer who made elegance serve inquiry. It is a record of arguments still alive, and of sentences that continue to think for us.
Author Biography
Introduction
Oscar Fingal O’Flahertie Wills Wilde (1854–1900) was an Irish-born poet, playwright, critic, and lecturer whose brilliance shaped late Victorian culture and continues to animate modern debates about art and society. Celebrated for comedies and a singular novel, he also forged a body of criticism and public lectures that clarified the ambitions of Aestheticism. The works gathered here—ranging from speculative dialogues and essays to addresses for students and audiences—trace his development from classical scholar to cosmopolitan polemicist. They show Wilde as theorist of style, advocate of beauty in daily life, and analyst of culture’s masks, positioning him as a pivotal figure in English-language letters.
The collection’s core pieces—The Decay of Lying, The Critic as Artist, The Truth of Masks, and The Soul of Man under Socialism—offer a coherent vision of art’s autonomy, the creativity of criticism, and the ethical claims of beauty. Complementary lectures such as The English Renaissance of Art, House Decoration, The Decorative Arts, The House Beautiful, Lecture to Art Students, and related sketches like London Models reveal his pedagogical gifts and practised eye. Pieces of paradox and aphorism—Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young and A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the Over-Educated—alongside De Profundis, complete a portrait of rare stylistic range and moral candour.
Education and Literary Influences
Wilde’s education began in Dublin, where a classical training fostered his lifelong attachment to Greece and Rome. At Trinity College he distinguished himself in Greek, a grounding that shaped his early scholarly writing and a cultivated responsiveness to rhetoric and form. The Rise of Historical Criticism, produced in his university years, reflects a mind alert to method and historiography rather than mere chronicle. From this discipline grew a lifelong habit of reading culture comparatively—poetry, painting, and performance entering his criticism as allied modes—an approach that later allowed him to cross from lectern to salon, and from academic analysis to urbane essay with unusual ease.
At Oxford he encountered two decisive influences: John Ruskin and Walter Pater. Ruskin’s moral seriousness about art and Pater’s advocacy of refined sensation and style furnished the poles of Wilde’s mature criticism. He absorbed them selectively, embracing Pater’s intensity while learning from Ruskin’s social conscience. French writers and the rhetoric of the masque, as well as Browning’s dramatic monologue, further marked his imagination. These influences surface everywhere: in the dialogues The Decay of Lying and The Critic as Artist, in the theatrical erudition of The Truth of Masks, and in the civic emphasis of lectures like The English Renaissance of Art and House Decoration.
Literary Career
Wilde first achieved wide public visibility as a lecturer. During the early 1880s he toured Britain, Ireland, and North America, speaking on design and culture. The English Renaissance of Art introduced audiences to a genealogy of modern taste, while The Decorative Arts, The House Beautiful, and House Decoration translated aesthetic principles into everyday practice—color, material, and craftsmanship as instruments of ethical refinement. Personal Impressions of America distils encounters from that tour into a reflective travel piece, revealing his flair for social observation. These lectures made him a recognisable cultural commentator long before the plays, helping to disseminate Aestheticism across transatlantic audiences.
His most sustained theoretical statements appear in the essays later collected in Intentions, represented here by The Decay of Lying, Pen, Pencil and Poison, The Critic as Artist, and The Truth of Masks. Wilde deploys the Socratic dialogue not to settle questions but to dramatize thought, making paradox a method. The Decay of Lying defends artifice against literalism; The Critic as Artist elevates criticism to a creative art; Pen, Pencil and Poison explores the uneasy traffic between beauty and crime; The Truth of Masks turns theatrical costume into a meditation on historical knowledge. Collectively, these pieces recalibrated Victorian criticism toward invention rather than reportage.
The Soul of Man under Socialism moved Wilde’s aesthetic argument into political terrain. Written in the early 1890s, it urges a society organized to free the individual imagination from coercive labor and moralism. His socialism is idiosyncratically individualist: technology should relieve drudgery; charity, divorced from structural change, may perpetuate dependence. The essay’s eloquence and provocation made it controversial, but it coheres with his broader insistence that creativity requires conditions of freedom. Read alongside the lectures on domestic beauty, it sketches a continuous program: from interior design and craft to civic structures that cultivate taste, autonomy, and compassion.
Wilde’s shorter pieces refine his epigrammatic art. Poems in Prose condenses spiritual and aesthetic intuitions into parable-like vignettes, testing the moral resonance of style itself. Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young and A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the Over-Educated push aphorism toward mischievous pedagogy, staging wit as a mode of critique. London Models, a study of the people who pose for artists, uncovers the labor that makes beauty visible and considers how anonymity and artistry meet in the studio. These brief forms—part jest, part judgment—made Wilde a master of compressed thought.
Pedagogy and performance remain central in Lecture to Art Students, where Wilde distils experience as critic and practitioner into counsel about seeing, making, and living with art. Companion lectures—Art and the Handicraftsman, House Decoration, The Decorative Arts, and The House Beautiful—address the social life of objects, the dignity of craft, and the harmonies of color and line in domestic space. Historical intelligence links these to The Truth of Masks and The Rise of Historical Criticism: whether discussing a theater’s wardrobe or the historian’s method, Wilde treats style as knowledge. Oscar Wilde’s Letter to Robert Browning testifies to his admiration for poetic voice and the fruitful uses of mask.
Beliefs and Advocacy
Wilde’s convictions connected the ethics of self-cultivation to the public sphere. In The English Renaissance of Art and allied lectures on decoration and design, he argues that taste is not luxury but discipline—an education of perception that dignifies work and domestic life. The House Beautiful and House Decoration insist that surroundings shape the soul, anticipating modern concerns with environmental aesthetics. Across these talks, he resists puritan suspicion of pleasure, proposing that beauty fosters sympathy and civility. This creed—art as a formative social force—grounds his insistence that societies reveal their character in their crafts, interiors, and theaters as surely as in their laws.
He also advocated intellectual liberty and humane reform. The Soul of Man under Socialism articulates a politics of individual flourishing, wary of authoritarian solutions and sentimental philanthropy. The dialogues defend the critic’s right to invention and to self-fashioning, treating the mask as an ethical instrument rather than deception. De Profundis, written during imprisonment, reconsiders suffering, forgiveness, and responsibility without renouncing the dignity of artistic life. Together these works outline a consistent program: protect the individual imagination, reform conditions that stunt it, and recognize criticism as a creative practice that can transform both maker and audience.
Final Years & Legacy
Wilde’s public triumphs as dramatist ended in legal scandal and imprisonment in the mid-1890s, an ordeal that shaped his later writing and reputation. In prison he composed De Profundis, a long letter of spiritual and artistic self-scrutiny that links earlier aesthetic principles to hard-won ethical reflection. After release he lived in relative obscurity on the Continent and died in Paris in 1900. Beyond celebrated plays and a novel, these essays and lectures powerfully define his legacy: they modernized English criticism, democratized design, and reframed debates about art’s relation to truth and society. Their wit and seriousness continue to guide readers, students, and makers.
Historical Context
Oscar Wilde’s miscellaneous prose ranges across the last decades of the nineteenth century, a period shaped by industrial expansion, imperial self-confidence, religious reassessment, and anxieties that cluster around the fin de siècle. Born in 1854 and dying in 1900, Wilde moved from Irish colonial periphery to metropolitan celebrity, writing for periodicals, lecturing internationally, and producing essays, dialogues, and open letters that comment on art, society, and the conditions of modern life. This collection gathers works written from his Oxford years through his American tour and the 1890s, including later prison writings, thus spanning the high tide of Victorian culture and its disquieting undertow as new media, social movements, and critical methods transformed public debate.
Aesthetics provided Wilde with both a method and a battlefield. The creed of “art for art’s sake,” associated in Britain with Walter Pater and with figures such as Whistler, offered an alternative to utilitarian moralism and to documentary realism. Wilde’s essays and lectures helped popularize Aestheticism within a mass culture shaped by cheap reprints, illustrated journalism, and the celebrity interview. They also intersected with the Arts and Crafts movement, which, under the influence of Ruskin and William Morris, opposed industrial standardization. The essays in this collection trace these currents as they compete and cross: sensuous form against moral earnestness, handcraft against machine, imaginative autonomy against social prescription.
The Decay of Lying, first published in periodical form and later collected in the early 1890s, stages a defense of imaginative fiction against the prestige of “realism.” It appears amid the spread of Naturalist practices in European fiction and theater, the ascendancy of social reportage, and the new authority of photography. Wilde’s dialogue treats journalism, the novel, and even landscape as susceptible to the shaping force of style, challenging the era’s reverence for fact. In an age when slums, stock exchanges, and science filled print with data, Wilde announces paradoxically that culture improves reality by inventing it—an affront to empiricist habits strengthened by education reforms and technical disciplines.
The Critic as Artist responds to a late-Victorian culture saturated with reviews, lectures, and arbitration of taste. Periodicals such as The Nineteenth Century and the Fortnightly Review drew large middle-class audiences to debates over Hellenism, nationalism, and morality in art. Wilde’s two-part dialogue contests Matthew Arnold’s moralizing criticism and advances a vision of the critic as creator, fortified by philological and historical learning yet liberated from policing utility. It draws on Continental aesthetic theory and on Oxford’s training in texts and traditions, seeking to raise criticism from journalism to a high imaginative practice just as the professional critic emerged as a recognizable cultural figure.
Pen, Pencil and Poison examines Thomas Griffiths Wainewright, the Regency artist and suspected poisoner whose case haunted Victorian fascination with crime. The essay belongs to a culture of sensation that included Newgate literature, trial transcripts, and criminological speculation (from phrenology to Lombroso’s later theories). Wilde’s treatment entwines biography, connoisseurship, and forensic anecdote, reflecting both the era’s relish for scandal and the instability of the boundary between aesthetic refinement and moral panic. By presenting the artist as implicated in transgression and the criminal as a figure of style, the essay interrogates how the modern press manufactured notoriety and how taste could be tainted by its proximity to the sensational.
The Truth of Masks addresses Shakespearean stage practice at a moment when antiquarian research, museum culture, and new stagecraft encouraged historically “authentic” productions. Managers like Henry Irving mounted elaborately designed performances, and electric lighting (introduced to leading theaters in the early 1880s) transformed visual expectations. Wilde’s essay deploys costume and scenic detail to argue that design is interpretation, not ornament. Yet, characteristically, it ends in paradox, querying its own strictures. The piece sits within broader nineteenth-century debates over fidelity to sources versus the claims of poetic illusion, and registers a culture learning to read material artifacts as arguments about the past.
The Rise of Historical Criticism, composed during Wilde’s Oxford years in the late 1870s and published posthumously, reflects the university’s absorption of German philology and historicist method. Figures such as Ranke in history and the higher critics of Scripture shaped an approach that traced texts through contexts, sources, and transmission. In Britain, scholars like Benjamin Jowett made classical study a crucible for liberal inquiry. Wilde’s survey charts how criticism moves from ancient rhetorical practice to modern scholarship, registering the nineteenth-century conviction that literature is historical. The essay prefigures his later art criticism by grounding aesthetic judgments in a genealogy of ideas and a self-conscious method.
The English Renaissance of Art, The Decorative Arts, House Decoration, and The House Beautiful document Wilde’s early 1880s lecture campaign, particularly his 1882 tour of the United States. These talks adapt Ruskinian and Morrisite arguments for a transatlantic audience fascinated by taste, domestic display, and the moral pedagogy of design. In the wake of the Great Exhibition of 1851 and the spread of department stores, the home became a theater of cultivated consumption. Wilde urged harmony of line, color, and craft in interiors, translating Aesthetic doctrine into practical advice. Railways, the telegraph, and a booming lecture circuit enabled such aesthetic evangelism to reach provincial and urban halls alike.
Art and the Handicraftsman and Lecture to Art Students locate Wilde within reformist debates over art education and labor. Since the 1850s, the South Kensington system had promoted design schooling linked to industry, while the Slade and other institutions professionalized studio training. Wilde’s addresses, delivered in the early 1880s, mediate between workshop skill and imaginative freedom, invoking guild ideals without repudiating modern institutions. They respond to the Arts and Crafts revival’s call for dignity in manual work, even as industrial capitalism intensified division of labor. In urging standards for materials, line, and discipline, Wilde speaks to a generation navigating professionalism, patronage, and market pressures.
London Models offers a city sketch shaped by contemporaneous social investigation journalism and the art schools’ dependence on hired sitters. The piece registers the economics of posing—its precariousness, gendered expectations, and moral scrutiny—within a metropolis fascinated by the spectacle of work. Late-Victorian debates on respectability and reform intersected with the practical needs of academies that required life study while appeasing public sentiment. The essay’s close observation of studios, poverty, and theatricality reflects a broader urban ethnography, akin to slum reporting and philanthropic surveys, yet inflected by Wilde’s sense of performance as social and artistic currency.
Poems in Prose, a group of short allegorical pieces published in the mid-1890s, bears the impress of French Symbolism and the fin-de-siècle little-magazine world. Wilde’s sojourns in Paris and engagement with Continental aesthetics encouraged a compressed, suggestive mode attuned to parable and dream. The pieces draw on biblical cadence and legend while abstaining from doctrinal assertion, reflecting a culture in which organized religion faced historical criticism and competing spiritualisms. Their publication in magazines with international readership situates them in a cosmopolitan circuit in which brevity, nuance, and typographic arrangement invited readers to savor style as thought.
The Soul of Man under Socialism, printed in 1891, emerges from an age of labor agitation and programmatic reform. New unionism, the Fabians, and Morris’s Socialist League advanced competing visions of collective life. Wilde’s essay rejects philanthropic paternalism and defends an individualism that could, he argued, flourish under socialism by abolishing the tyranny of need. He recasts ownership and charity as impediments to creative self-development, anticipating later modernist critiques of mass conformity. Written before his trials, the essay also bears the stamp of Arts and Crafts critiques of ugliness and shoddy production, proposing that a reconfigured economy would liberate both maker and beholder.
Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young and A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the Over-Educated distill the late-Victorian taste for epigram, a form that thrived in newspapers and student magazines. Published in the mid-1890s, the former appeared in The Chameleon, an Oxford miscellany later cited in the atmosphere surrounding Wilde’s 1895 trials. These fragments demonstrate how wit circulated as social currency and how a culture quick with aphorism could weaponize quotation. Their context includes campus clubs, coterie publications, and a press eager to codify a “decadent” style, turning stylistic play into moral evidence during periods of scandal.
De Profundis, written in 1897 during imprisonment at Reading Gaol and published in abridged form after Wilde’s death, belongs to the literature of confinement and spiritual reckoning. His incarceration (1895–1897), under legislation that criminalized sexual acts between men, exposed him to the late-Victorian penitentiary regime of isolation and hard labor. The letter reflects on love, art, suffering, and Christ, revising earlier aesthetic postures under the pressure of punishment. It participates in broader debates over prison discipline and humanitarian reform while drawing on traditions of religious confession and romantic self-fashioning—an extraordinary document of how a public intellectual read his fate through the language of culture.
Oscar Wilde’s Letter to Robert Browning exemplifies the nineteenth century’s culture of public homage and literary societies. Browning’s prestige, supported by clubs and readings, made him a touchstone for discussions of obscurity, dramatic voice, and the moral scope of poetry. Wilde’s letter aligns him with a generation that learned expressive license from Browning’s monologues and admired their theatrical masks. The document shows Wilde participating in a respectful, printed conversation across generations—a mode of literary sociability nourished by journals and by commemorative practices that transformed living poets into civic monuments, particularly in the years when Browning’s reputation stood at its zenith.
Personal Impressions of America gathers reflections from Wilde’s 1882 tour, when he crossed a nation undergoing rapid urbanization, industrial consolidation, and cultural self-assertion. He lectured from New York to the mining towns of the West, meeting boosters, journalists, and skeptics. The United States’ Gilded Age context—railroads, trusts, new fortunes—provided material for observations on manners, art industries, and publicity. American newspapers’ caricatures of the aesthetic “apostle” made Wilde both a target and master of modern self-branding. These impressions show how lecturing itself, enabled by rail networks and telegraphy, functioned as a medium through which aesthetic ideals were negotiated with mass audiences.
The Decorative Arts and The House Beautiful, alongside House Decoration, belong to late-nineteenth-century campaigns to reform everyday surroundings through design. Museums, schools, and trade journals promoted ornament, proportion, and honest materials as antidotes to shoddy goods and visual clutter. Wilde translated such programs into household advice, bridging elite taste and middle-class aspiration in a consumer market of wallpapers, carpets, and ceramics. His recommendations reflect the traffic between museum collections and manufacturers, and the belief—rooted in Ruskin—that moral life could be tutored by beauty. These pieces also recognize the home as a site where women, as tastemakers, were addressed directly by the culture of advice literature, exhibitions, and shops. The English Renaissance of Art and related lectures also folded into an international debate over nationhood and tradition. British commentators sought to define an “English Renaissance” that linked medieval revivalism, the Pre-Raphaelites, and modern design reform to continental humanism. Wilde’s version, indebted to Pater’s revaluation of sensuous form, offered a genealogy for modern taste that dignified contemporary artists by locating them within a long arc. Delivered in Britain and America, these lectures positioned English art as a civilizing export at the very moment the British Empire displayed its wares at exhibitions, and U.S. museums—newly founded—sought lineages that could authorize domestic culture and commerce. Across these works, theater emerges as a crucial testing ground for modernity. The Truth of Masks, reprised in various anthologies, and Wilde’s broader theatrical commentary track shifts from actor-manager systems to more specialized production teams. The adoption of historically researched costumes paralleled growing academic professionalism, while the star system and touring circuits exploited railway timetables. Debates over realism, illusion, and propriety unfolded before audiences newly disciplined by darkened auditoria and reserved seating. Wilde’s prose shows how material choices—fabric, armor, lighting—shape interpretation, documenting a culture moving from declamatory recitation to pictorial staging amid pressure from archaeology, museums, and the commerce of spectacle. The collection also registers the transformations of the press. Periodicals furnished Wilde with platforms and audiences, while interviews, editorials, and cartoons fashioned his persona. Essays like The Decay of Lying and The Critic as Artist spar with journalism’s claim to fact and usefulness; Pen, Pencil and Poison exploits the appetite for true crime; the aphorisms condense thought for quick consumption. New printing technologies, expanding literacy, and transatlantic syndication made critical positions portable, but also made style prosecutable. The same networks that amplified his reputation supplied documents and frames later mobilized in court, showing how print capitalism shaped both the circulation of ideas and the policing of artists. The political and social ferment of late-Victorian Britain presses on Wilde’s themes even when politics seems absent. Debates over Irish Home Rule, the growth of organized labor, and anxieties about urban poverty inform his insistence on the claims of beauty and individuality. The Soul of Man under Socialism addresses these directly; London Models and lectures on craft touch on labor and remuneration. The educational expansion that produced new reading publics also generated new gatekeepers, prompting Wilde to defend criticism as creative. Meanwhile, religious doubt and revivalism, catalyzed by historical criticism, provide the backdrop to the biblical cadences and paradoxical sanctities of Poems in Prose and De Profundis. For later readers, this miscellany has functioned as a record of the fin de siècle’s experiments in value. Early twentieth-century editors framed the essays as testimony to Aestheticism’s excess or brilliance; mid-century scholarship recovered their intellectual seriousness; late twentieth-century criticism, including queer studies and material culture, found in them arguments about self-fashioning, consumption, and the politics of taste. The recurrence of essays like The Truth of Masks across editions shows how editorial practice constructs a canon from periodical fragments. As a whole, the collection stands as both product and commentary on its age—an archive through which subsequent generations have reinterpreted Victorian culture’s desires, disciplines, and dreams.
Synopsis (Selection)
Aesthetic Dialogues and Theatrical Criticism (The Decay of Lying; The Critic as Artist; The Truth of Masks)
These pieces champion artifice, imagination, and the primacy of criticism while challenging realism and didactic art. Through witty paradox and staged conversation, they argue that style can disclose truth and that theatrical costume and convention reveal deeper realities. The tone is urbane and contrarian, asserting art’s autonomy and the transformative power of the mask.
Art History and Criticism (The Rise of Historical Criticism; The English Renaissance of Art)
These essays trace the formation of critical method and celebrate a revival of artistic sensibility grounded in classical and Renaissance inheritances. Wilde balances survey and advocacy, linking attention to the past with a call for refined modern taste. The voice is scholarly yet sumptuous, stressing continuity, cultivation, and the education of perception.
Lectures on Decorative Arts and Design (House Decoration; Art and the Handicraftsman; The Decorative Arts; The House Beautiful)
Practical talks outline how beauty should shape domestic life, craftsmanship, and the objects that fill a room. Wilde urges harmony between utility and ornament, arguing for honest materials, humane labor, and a unified sense of taste. The counsel is crisp and persuasive, aimed at reforming everyday surroundings through intelligent design.
Studios, Students, and Models (Lecture to Art Students; London Models)
Addressed to aspiring artists, these pieces combine encouragement with rigor, insisting that technique serve vision and that originality springs from attentive study. A companion sketch humanizes the professional model, revealing the unseen discipline behind finished pictures. The mood mixes mentorship with social observation, attentive to the labor that sustains art.
Pen, Pencil and Poison — A Study in Green
A polished case study examines the uneasy coexistence of aesthetic refinement and moral transgression in the life of a notorious artist. Wilde dissects the allure of style alongside the facts of crime, refusing simple judgments. The result is a cool, ambiguous meditation on beauty, notoriety, and the narratives that frame them.
Poems in Prose
Brief, symbol-laden parables explore pity, pride, love, and the cost of vision. Their distilled scenes blend scriptural cadence with modern irony, inviting multiple interpretations. The effect is lyrical and unsettling, compressing whole moral dramas into a few imagistic moments.
The Soul of Man under Socialism
A provocative manifesto imagines a society where revised institutions liberate individual creativity rather than enforce conformity. Wilde critiques punitive charity and possessive economics, proposing a future that prizes personal development. The argument is utopian and incisive, fusing political speculation with aesthetic values.
Aphorisms and Maxims (Phrases and Philosophies for the Use of the Young; A Few Maxims for the Instruction of the Over-Educated)
Concentrated epigrams flip conventional wisdom about education, virtue, and culture. The pieces revel in paradox, using brevity to expose pretensions and unsettle easy pieties. Their tone is playful yet sharp, offering portable provocations rather than prescriptions.
Personal Letters and Impressions (De Profundis; Oscar Wilde’s Letter to Robert Browning; Personal Impressions of America)
A deeply personal letter confronts loss, responsibility, and the remaking of the self through suffering and art. A tribute to a fellow poet clarifies Wilde’s ideals, while travel sketches capture America with irony and curiosity. Together they trace a movement from public sparkle to private reckoning, revealing resilience within style.
The Miscellaneous Writings of Oscar Wilde
THE DECAY OF LYING
A DIALOGUE.
Persons: Cyril and Vivian. Scene: the Library of a country house in Nottinghamshire.
CYRIL (coming in through the open window from the terrace). My dear Vivian, don’t coop yourself up all day in the library. It is a perfectly lovely afternoon. The air is exquisite. There is a mist upon the woods, like the purple bloom upon a plum. Let us go and lie on the grass and smoke cigarettes and enjoy Nature.
VIVIAN. Enjoy Nature! I am glad to say that I have entirely lost that faculty. People tell us that Art makes us love Nature more than we loved her before; that it reveals her secrets to us; and that after a careful study of Corot and Constable we see things in her that had escaped our observation. My own experience is that the more we study Art, the less we care for Nature. What Art really reveals to us is Nature’s lack of design, her curious crudities, her extraordinary monotony, her absolutely unfinished condition. Nature has good intentions, of course, but, as Aristotle once said, she cannot carry them out. When I look at a landscape I cannot help seeing all its defects. It is fortunate for us, however, that Nature is so imperfect, as otherwise we should have no art at all. Art is our spirited protest, our gallant attempt to teach Nature her proper place[1q]. As for the infinite variety of Nature, that is a pure myth. It is not to be found in Nature herself. It resides in the imagination, or fancy, or cultivated blindness of the man who looks at her.
CYRIL. Well, you need not look at the landscape. You can lie on the grass and smoke and talk.
VIVIAN. But Nature is so uncomfortable. Grass is hard and lumpy and damp, and full of dreadful black insects. Why, even Morris’s poorest workman could make you a more comfortable seat than the whole of Nature can. Nature pales before the furniture of ‘the street which from Oxford has borrowed its name,’ as the poet you love so much once vilely phrased it. I don’t complain. If Nature had been comfortable, mankind would never have invented architecture, and I prefer houses to the open air. In a house we all feel of the proper proportions. Everything is subordinated to us, fashioned for our use and our pleasure. Egotism itself, which is so necessary to a proper sense of human dignity, is entirely the result of indoor life. Out of doors one becomes abstract and impersonal. One’s individuality absolutely leaves one. And then Nature is so indifferent, so unappreciative. Whenever I am walking in the park here, I always feel that I am no more to her than the cattle that browse on the slope, or the burdock that blooms in the ditch. Nothing is more evident than that Nature hates Mind. Thinking is the most unhealthy thing in the world, and people die of it just as they die of any other disease. Fortunately, in England at any rate, thought is not catching. Our splendid physique as a people is entirely due to our national stupidity. I only hope we shall be able to keep this great historic bulwark of our happiness for many years to come; but I am afraid that we are beginning to be over-educated; at least everybody who is incapable of learning has taken to teaching—that is really what our enthusiasm for education has come to. In the meantime, you had better go back to your wearisome uncomfortable Nature, and leave me to correct my proofs.
CYRIL. Writing an article! That is not very consistent after what you have just said.
VIVIAN. Who wants to be consistent? The dullard and the doctrinaire, the tedious people who carry out their principles to the bitter end of action, to the reductio ad absurdum of practice. Not I. Like Emerson, I write over the door of my library the word ‘Whim.’ Besides, my article is really a most salutary and valuable warning. If it is attended to, there may be a new Renaissance of Art.
CYRIL. What is the subject?
VIVIAN. I intend to call it ‘The Decay of Lying: A Protest.’
CYRIL. Lying! I should have thought that our politicians kept up that habit.
VIVIAN. I assure you that they do not. They never rise beyond the level of misrepresentation, and actually condescend to prove, to discuss, to argue. How different from the temper of the true liar, with his frank, fearless statements, his superb irresponsibility, his healthy, natural disdain of proof of any kind! After all, what is a fine lie? Simply that which is its own evidence. If a man is sufficiently unimaginative to produce evidence in support of a lie, he might just as well speak the truth at once. No, the politicians won’t do. Something may, perhaps, be urged on behalf of the Bar. The mantle of the Sophist has fallen on its members. Their feigned ardours and unreal rhetoric are delightful. They can make the worse appear the better cause, as though they were fresh from Leontine schools, and have been known to wrest from reluctant juries triumphant verdicts of acquittal for their clients, even when those clients, as often happens, were clearly and unmistakeably innocent. But they are briefed by the prosaic, and are not ashamed to appeal to precedent. In spite of their endeavours, the truth will out. Newspapers, even, have degenerated. They may now be absolutely relied upon. One feels it as one wades through their columns. It is always the unreadable that occurs. I am afraid that there is not much to be said in favour of either the lawyer or the journalist. Besides, what I am pleading for is Lying in art. Shall I read you what I have written? It might do you a great deal of good.
CYRIL. Certainly, if you give me a cigarette. Thanks. By the way, what magazine do you intend it for?
VIVIAN. For the Retrospective Review. I think I told you that the elect had revived it.
CYRIL. Whom do you mean by ‘the elect’?
VIVIAN. Oh, The Tired Hedonists, of course. It is a club to which I belong. We are supposed to wear faded roses in our buttonholes when we meet, and to have a sort of cult for Domitian. I am afraid you are not eligible. You are too fond of simple pleasures.
CYRIL. I should be blackballed on the ground of animal spirits, I suppose?
VIVIAN. Probably. Besides, you are a little too old. We don’t admit anybody who is of the usual age.
CYRIL. Well, I should fancy you are all a good deal bored with each other.
VIVIAN. We are. This is one of the objects of the club. Now, if you promise not to interrupt too often, I will read you my article.
CYRIL. You will find me all attention.
VIVIAN (reading in a very clear, musical voice). THE DECAY OF LYING: A PROTEST.—One of the chief causes that can be assigned for the curiously commonplace character of most of the literature of our age is undoubtedly the decay of Lying as an art, a science, and a social pleasure. The ancient historians gave us delightful fiction in the form of fact; the modem novelist presents us with dull facts under the guise of fiction. The Blue-Book is rapidly becoming his ideal both for method and manner. He has his tedious document humain, his miserable little coin de la creation, into which he peers with his microscope. He is to be found at the Librairie Nationale, or at the British Museum, shamelessly reading up his subject. He has not even the courage of other people’s ideas, but insists on going directly to life for everything, and ultimately, between encyclopaedias and personal experience, he comes to the ground, having drawn his types from the family circle or from the weekly washerwoman, and having acquired an amount of useful information from which never, even in his most meditative moments, can he thoroughly free himself.
‘The lose that results to literature in general from this false ideal of our time can hardly be overestimated. People have a careless way of talking about a “born liar,” just as they talk about a “born poet.” But in both cases they are wrong. Lying and poetry are arts—arts, as Pinto saw, not unconnected with each other—and they require the most careful study, the most disinterested devotion. Indeed, they have their technique, just as the more material arts of painting and sculpture have, their subtle secrets of form and colour, their craft-mysteries, their deliberate artistic methods. As one knows the poet by his fine music, so one can recognise the liar by his rich rhythmic utterance, and in neither case will the casual inspiration of the moment suffice. Here, as elsewhere, practice must, precede perfection. But in modern days while the fashion of writing poetry has become far too common, and should, if possible, be discouraged, the fashion of lying has almost fallen into disrepute. Many a young man starts in life with a natural gift for exaggeration which, if nurtured in congenial and sympathetic surroundings, or by the imitation of the best models, might grow into something really great and wonderful. But, as a rule, he comes to nothing. He either falls into careless habits of accuracy—’
CYRIL. My dear fellow!
VIVIAN. Please don’t interrupt in the middle of a sentence. ‘He either falls into careless habits of accuracy, or takes to frequenting the society of the aged and the well-informed. Both things are equally fatal to his imagination, as indeed they would be fatal to the imagination of anybody, and in a short time he develops a morbid and unhealthy faculty of truth-telling, begins to verify all statements made in his presence, has no hesitation in contradicting people who are much younger than himself, and often ends by writing novels which are so lifelike that no one can possibly believe in their probability. This is no isolated instance that we are giving. It is simply one example out of many; and if something cannot be done to check, or at least to modify, our monstrous worship of facts, Art will become sterile, and beauty will pass away from the land.
‘Even Mr. Robert Louis Stevenson, that delightful master of delicate and fanciful prose, is tainted with this modern vice, for we know positively no other name for it. There is such a thing as robbing a story of its reality by trying to make it too true, and The Black Arrow is so inartistic as not to contain a single anachronism to boast of, while the transformation of Dr. Jekyll reads dangerously like an experiment out of the Lancet. As for Mr. Rider Haggard, who really has, or had once, the makings of a perfectly magnificent liar, he is now so afraid of being suspected of genius that when he does tell us anything marvellous, he feels bound to invent a personal reminiscence, and to put it into a footnote as a kind of cowardly corroboration. Nor are our other novelists much better. Mr. Henry James writes fiction as if it were a painful duty, and wastes upon mean motives and imperceptible “points of view” his neat literary style, his felicitous phrases, his swift and caustic satire. Mr. Hall Caine, it is true, aims at the grandiose, but then he writes at the top of his voice. He is so loud that one cannot bear what he says. Mr. James Payn is an adept in the art of concealing what is not worth finding. He hunts down the obvious with the enthusiasm of a shortsighted detective. As one turns over the pages, the suspense of the author becomes almost unbearable. The horses of Mr. William Black’s phaeton do not soar towards the sun. They merely frighten the sky at evening into violent chromolithographic effects. On seeing them approach, the peasants take refuge in dialect. Mrs. Oliphant prattles pleasantly about curates, lawn-tennis parties, domesticity, and other wearisome things. Mr. Marion Crawford has immolated himself upon the altar of local colour. He is like the lady in the French comedy who keeps talking about “le beau ciel d’Italie.” Besides, he has fallen into the bad habit of uttering moral platitudes. He is always telling us that to be good is to be good, and that to be bad is to be wicked. At times he is almost edifying. Robert Elsmere is of course a masterpiece—a masterpiece of the “genre ennuyeux,” the one form of literature that the English people seems thoroughly to enjoy. A thoughtful young friend of ours once told us that it reminded him of the sort of conversation that goes on at a meat tea in the house of a serious Nonconformist family, and we can quite believe it. Indeed it is only in England that such a book could be produced. England is the home of lost ideas. As for that great and daily increasing school of novelists for whom the sun always rises in the East-End, the only thing that can be said about them is that they find life crude, and leave it raw.
‘In France, though nothing so deliberately tedious as Robert Elsmere has been produced, things are not much better. M. Guy de Maupassant, with his keen mordant irony and his hard vivid style, strips life of the few poor rags that still cover her, and shows us foul sore and festering wound. He writes lurid little tragedies in which everybody is ridiculous; bitter comedies at which one cannot laugh for very tears. M. Zola, true to the lofty principle that he lays down in one of his pronunciamientos on literature, “L’homme de genie n’a jamais d’esprit,” is determined to show that, if he has not got genius, he can at least be dull. And how well he succeeds! He is not without power. Indeed at times, as in Germinal, there is something almost epic in his work. But his work is entirely wrong from beginning to end, and wrong not on the ground of morals, but on the ground of art. From any ethical standpoint it is just what it should be. The author is perfectly truthful, and describes things exactly as they happen. What more can any moralist desire? We have no sympathy at all with the moral indignation of our time against M. Zola. It is simply the indignation of Tartuffe on being exposed. But from the standpoint of art, what can be said in favour of the author of L’Assommoir, Nana and Pot-Bouille? Nothing. Mr. Ruskin once described the characters in George Eliot’s novels as being like the sweepings of a Pentonville omnibus, but M. Zola’s characters are much worse. They have their dreary vices, and their drearier virtues. The record of their lives is absolutely without interest. Who cares what happens to them? In literature we require distinction, charm, beauty and imaginative power. We don’t want to be harrowed and disgusted with an account of the doings of the lower orders. M. Daudet is better. He has wit, a light touch and an amusing style. But he has lately committed literary suicide. Nobody can possibly care for Delobelle with his “Il faut lutter pour l’art,” or for Valmajour with his eternal refrain about the nightingale, or for the poet in Jack with his “mots cruels,” now that we have learned from Vingt Ans de ma Vie litteraire that these characters were taken directly from life. To us they seem to have suddenly lost all their vitality, all the few qualities they ever possessed. The only real people are the people who never existed, and if a novelist is base enough to go to life for his personages he should at least pretend that they are creations, and not boast of them as copies. The justification of a character in a novel is not that other persons are what they are, but that the author is what he is. Otherwise the novel is not a work of art. As for M. Paul Bourget, the master of the roman psychologique, he commits the error of imagining that the men and women of modern life are capable of being infinitely analysed for an innumerable series of chapters. In point of fact what is interesting about people in good society—and M. Bourget rarely moves out of the Faubourg St. Germain, except to come to London,— is the mask that each one of them wears, not the reality that lies behind the mask. It is a humiliating confession, but we are all of us made out of the same stuff. In Falstaff there is something of Hamlet, in Hamlet there is not a little of Falstaff. The fat knight has his moods of melancholy, and the young prince his moments of coarse humour. Where we differ from each other is purely in accidentals: in dress, manner, tone of voice, religious opinions, personal appearance, tricks of habit and the like. The more one analyses people, the more all reasons for analysis disappear. Sooner or later one comes to that dreadful universal thing called human nature. Indeed, as any one who has ever worked among the poor knows only too well, the brotherhood of man is no mere poet’s dream, it is a most depressing and humiliating reality; and if a writer insists upon analysing the upper classes, he might just as well write of match-girls and costermongers at once.’ However, my dear Cyril, I will not detain you any further just here. I quite admit that modern novels have many good points. All I insist on is that, as a class, they are quite unreadable.
CYRIL. That is certainly a very grave qualification, but I must say that I think you are rather unfair in some of your strictures. I like The Deemster, and The Daughter of Heth, and Le Disciple, and Mr. Isaacs, and as for Robert Elsmere, I am quite devoted to it. Not that I can look upon it as a serious work. As a statement of the problems that confront the earnest Christian it is ridiculous and antiquated. It is simply Arnold’s Literature and Dogma with the literature left out. It is as much behind the age as Paley’s Evidences, or Colenso’s method of Biblical exegesis. Nor could anything be less impressive than the unfortunate hero gravely heralding a dawn that rose long ago, and so completely missing its true significance that he proposes to carry on the business of the old firm under the new name. On the other hand, it contains several clever caricatures, and a heap of delightful quotations, and Green’s philosophy very pleasantly sugars the somewhat bitter pill of the author’s fiction. I also cannot help expressing my surprise that you have said nothing about the two novelists whom you are always reading, Balzac and George Meredith. Surely they are realists, both of them?
VIVIAN. Ah! Meredith! Who can define him? His style is chaos illumined by flashes of lightning. As a writer he has mastered everything except language: as a novelist he can do everything, except tell a story: as an artist he is everything except articulate. Somebody in Shakespeare—Touchstone, I think—talks about a man who is always breaking his shins over his own wit, and it seems to me that this might serve as the basis for a criticism of Meredith’s method. But whatever he is, he is not a realist. Or rather I would say that he is a child of realism who is not on speaking terms with his father. By deliberate choice he has made himself a romanticist. He has refused to bow the knee to Baal, and after all, even if the man’s fine spirit did not revolt against the noisy assertions of realism, his style would be quite sufficient of itself to keep life at a respectful distance. By its means he has planted round his garden a hedge full of thorns, and red with wonderful roses. As for Balzac, he was a most remarkable combination of the artistic temperament with the scientific spirit. The latter he bequeathed to his disciples. The former was entirely his own. The difference between such a book as M. Zola’s L’Assommoir and Balzac’s Illusions Perdues is the difference between unimaginative realism and imaginative reality. ‘All Balzac’s characters;’ said Baudelaire, ‘are gifted with the same ardour of life that animated himself. All his fictions are as deeply coloured as dreams. Each mind is a weapon loaded to the muzzle with will. The very scullions have genius.’ A steady course of Balzac reduces our living friends to shadows, and our acquaintances to the shadows of shades. His characters have a kind of fervent fiery-coloured existence. They dominate us, and defy scepticism. One of the greatest tragedies of my life is the death of Lucien de Rubempre. It is a grief from which I have never been able completely to rid myself. It haunts me in my moments of pleasure. I remember it when I laugh. But Balzac is no more a realist than Holbein was. He created life, he did not copy it. I admit, however, that he set far too high a value on modernity of form, and that, consequently, there is no book of his that, as an artistic masterpiece, can rank with Salammbo or Esmond, or The Cloister and the Hearth, or the Vicomte de Bragelonne.
CYRIL. Do you object to modernity of form, then?
VIVIAN. Yes. It is a huge price to pay for a very poor result. Pure modernity of form is always somewhat vulgarising. It cannot help being so. The public imagine that, because they are interested in their immediate surroundings, Art should be interested in them also, and should take them as her subject-matter. But the mere fact that they are interested in these things makes them unsuitable subjects for Art. The only beautiful things, as somebody once said, are the things that do not concern us. As long as a thing is useful or necessary to us, or affects us in any way, either for pain or for pleasure, or appeals strongly to our sympathies, or is a vital part of the environment in which we live, it is outside the proper sphere of art. To art’s subject-matter we should be more or less indifferent. We should, at any rate, have no preferences, no prejudices, no partisan feeling of any kind. It is exactly because Hecuba is nothing to us that her sorrows are such an admirable motive for a tragedy. I do not know anything in the whole history of literature sadder than the artistic career of Charles Reade. He wrote one beautiful book, The Cloister and the Hearth, a book as much above Romola as Romola is above Daniel Deronda, and wasted the rest of his life in a foolish attempt to be modern, to draw public attention to the state of our convict prisons, and the management of our private lunatic asylums. Charles Dickens was depressing enough in all conscience when he tried to arouse our sympathy for the victims of the poor-law administration; but Charles Reade, an artist, a scholar, a man with a true sense of beauty, raging and roaring over the abuses of contemporary life like a common pamphleteer or a sensational journalist, is really a sight for the angels to weep over. Believe me, my dear Cyril, modernity of form and modernity of subject-matter are entirely and absolutely wrong. We have mistaken the common livery of the age for the vesture of the Muses, and spend our days in the sordid streets and hideous suburbs of our vile cities when we should be out on the hillside with Apollo. Certainly we are a degraded race, and have sold our birthright for a mess of facts.
CYRIL. There is something in what you say, and there is no doubt that whatever amusement we may find in reading a purely model novel, we have rarely any artistic pleasure in re-reading it. And this is perhaps the best rough test of what is literature and what is not. If one cannot enjoy reading a book over and over again, there is no use reading it at all. But what do you say about the return to Life and Nature? This is the panacea that is always being recommended to us.
VIVIAN. I will read you what I say on that subject. The passage comes later on in the article, but I may as well give it to you now:-
‘The popular cry of our time is “Let us return to Life and Nature; they will recreate Art for us, and send the red blood coursing through her veins; they will shoe her feet with swiftness and make her hand strong.” But, alas! we are mistaken in our amiable and well-meaning efforts. Nature is always behind the age. And as for Life, she is the solvent that breaks up Art, the enemy that lays waste her house.’
CYRIL. What do you mean by saying that Nature is always behind the age?
VIVIAN. Well, perhaps that is rather cryptic. What I mean is this. If we take Nature to mean natural simple instinct as opposed to self-conscious culture, the work produced under this influence is always old-fashioned, antiquated, and out of date. One touch of Nature may make the whole world kin, but two touches of Nature will destroy any work of Art. If, on the other hand, we regard Nature as the collection of phenomena external to man, people only discover in her what they bring to her. She has no suggestions of her own. Wordsworth went to the lakes, but he was never a lake poet. He found in stones the sermons he had already hidden there. He went moralising about the district, but his good work was produced when he returned, not to Nature but to poetry. Poetry gave him ‘Laodamia,’ and the fine sonnets, and the great Ode, such as it is. Nature gave him ‘Martha Ray’ and ‘Peter Bell,’ and the address to Mr. Wilkinson’s spade.
CYRIL. I think that view might be questioned. I am rather inclined to believe in ‘the impulse from a vernal wood,’ though of course the artistic value of such an impulse depends entirely on the kind of temperament that receives it, so that the return to Nature would come to mean simply the advance to a great personality. You would agree with that, I fancy. However, proceed with your article.
VIVIAN (reading). ‘Art begins with abstract decoration, with purely imaginative and pleasurable work dealing with what is unreal and non-existent. This is the first stage. Then Life becomes fascinated with this new wonder, and asks to be admitted into the charmed circle. Art takes life as part of her rough material, recreates it, and refashions it in fresh forms, is absolutely indifferent to fact, invents, imagines, dreams, and keeps between herself and reality the impenetrable barrier of beautiful style, of decorative or ideal treatment. The third stage is when Life gets the upper hand, and drives Art out into the wilderness. That is the true decadence, and it is from this that we are now suffering.
