Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology E-Book

• Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Serie: Blackwell Companions to Religion
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 1665

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2018

Beschreibung

Offers a comprehensive survey and interpretation of contemporary Christian political theology in a newly revised and expanded edition This book presents the latest thinking on the topic of contemporary Christian political theology, with original and constructive essays that represent a range of opinions on various topics. With contributions from expert scholars in the field, it reflects a broad range of methodologies, ecclesial traditions, and geographic and social locations, and provides a sense of the diversity of political theologies. It also addresses the primary resources of the Christian tradition, which theologians draw on when constructing political theologies, and surveys some of the most important figures and movements in political theology. This revised and expanded edition provides the most comprehensive and accessible introduction to this lively and growing area of Christian theology. Organized into five sections, Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology, Second Edition addresses the many changes that have occurred over the last 15 years within the field of political theology. It features new essays that address social developments and movements, such as Anglican Social Thought, John Milbank, Anabaptist Political Theologies, African Political Theologies, Postcolonialism, Political Economy, Technology and Virtuality, and Grass-roots Movements. The book also includes a new essay on the reception of Liberation Theology. * Offers essays on topics such as the Trinity, atonement, and eschatology * Features contributions from leading voices in the field of political theology * Includes all-new entries covering fresh developments and movements like the urgency of climate change, virtuality and the digital age, the economic crisis of 2008, the discourse of religion and violence, and new modalities of war * Addresses some important social movements from a theological point of view including postmodernism, grass-roots movements, and more * Provides both Islamic and Jewish responses to political theology Written for academics and students of political theology, Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology, 2nd Edition is an enlightening read that offers a wide range of authoritative essays from some of the most notable scholars in the field.

Leseprobe

Table of Contents

Cover

Notes on Contributors

Acknowledgments

Introduction to the Second Edition

A Second Edition

What Is Political Theology?

A Brief History of Political Theology

Some Conceptual Distinctions

What’s in This Companion?

References

I. Historical Resources: Scripture, Traditions, Liturgy

CHAPTER 1: Scripture

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

VII

References

CHAPTER 2: Scripture

The Contrast between God and Caesar: John Milton’s

The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates

(1649)

The Four Gospels: Jesus, Prophet and Embodiment of the Kingdom of God

Paul: Practical Politics in the Overlap of the Ages

Revelation: The Prophetic Protest Against the Beast and Babylon

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 3: Augustine

Augustine on the Self

Augustine on Social Life

The Two Cities

Augustine on War and Peace

Augustine Concluded

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 4: Aquinas

The Contours of Thomas’s Thought: Exegesis of a Text

Speaking Truth to Power

Law, Order, Beauty

Thomas Today

References

CHAPTER 5: The Reformation

Martin Luther

Thomas Müntzer

The Anabaptists

John Calvin

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 6: Liturgy

The Political Nature of Worship

Threats, Losses, Struggles

Rediscoveries

Modes of Relating Worship and Politics

Conclusion

References

Further Reading

II. Contemporary Political Theologies: Survey

CHAPTER 7: Eastern Orthodox Thought

Foundations for an Orthodox Political Theology

Orthodox Contributions in the Field of Political Theology

Recent Developments

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 8: Carl Schmitt

An “Authentic Case of a Christian Epimetheus”?

A Political Theologian?

Schmitt’s Political Theology and Its Catholic Reception

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 9: Karl Barth

His Times

Theology and Politics

The Freedom of God: Let God Be God and World Be World

Distinguish and Relate

Two Key Texts

Politics as Parable of the Kingdom of God

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 10: Dietrich Bonhoeffer

The Fragments That Were Bonhoeffer’s Life and Work

Bonhoeffer’s Recovery of the Political Significance of the Visible Church

Bonhoeffer’s Search for a Political Ethic

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 11: John Courtney Murray

I

II

III

IV

V

References

CHAPTER 12: Anglican Political Theology

Introduction

What It Is Not

Contemplative Pragmatism

Sociality and Plurality

Anglicanism as a Modern Social Imaginary

Providence and History

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 13: Reinhold Niebuhr

I

II

III

IV

Acknowledgments

References

CHAPTER 14: Feminist Theology, Southern

Sociopolitical Contexts of Feminist Theology in the South

Feminism, Colonialism, and Christianity

Cultural Politics and Theology

Ecojustice and the Struggle for Life

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 15: Feminist Theology, Northern

Introduction

Historical Overview

Feminist Theology as Theology of Liberation

The Right Question …

Critique and Reconstruction

Future Prospects

Conclusion

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 16: Jürgen Moltmann

Eschatology

Christology

Ecclesiology

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 17: Johann Baptist Metz

Dangerous Memories and Interruptions: A Theological Itinerary

The Structure of Metz’s Fundamental Theology with a Practical Intent

Conclusion

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 18: Political Theologies in Asia

I: Asian Third‐World Theology or Asian Theology of Liberation

II: Theology of the Minjung, the Dalits, and the Asian Feminists

Further Reading

CHAPTER 19: Black Political Theologies

Definition

Tasks and Methods

Origins and Early Formulations

Protracted and Urgent Issues

New Trajectories, Persistent Challenges

Conclusion

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 20: Liberation Theology 1

A Theology of Liberation: From Lima to Medellín

A New Way to Do Theology: The Preferential Option for the Poor

An Integral Liberation

A Spirituality of Liberation

Expanding the Vision: Critique and Dialogue

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 21: Liberation Theology 2

The Problem of Generations

Two Types of Liberation Theology

Twenty‐First‐Century Developments

Reception in Africa and Asia

Conclusions: Faith, Theology, and Social Justice

References

CHAPTER 22: Stanley Hauerwas

Character and the Durable Self

The Church as Kiln of the Soul

Against Constantinianism

Liberal or Conservative?

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 23: John Milbank

Acknowledgments

References

CHAPTER 24: Anabaptist Political Theologies

Sixteenth‐Century Anabaptism: Two Theopolitical Paradigms

John Howard Yoder and the Twentieth‐Century Rise of Anabaptist Theopolitics

Anabaptist Theopolitical Legacy: Twenty‐First Century Questions

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 25: Political Theologies of Africa

Reforming Nation‐State Modernities

Embracing Africa’s Political Modernity

Reinventing Africa’s Political Modernity

References

III. Constructive Political Theology

CHAPTER 26: Trinity

Inflated Claims for the Trinity

From God to Humans

Do We Model Ourselves on the Trinity or Participate in It?

References

CHAPTER 27: Creation

The Orderings of Creation

Creation, History, and Covenant

By Nature

Ecology

The Creation of Political Theology

References

CHAPTER 28: Christology

The Salvation Drama of Jesus

Implications

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 29: Atonement

Redemption

Justification

Sacrifice

Reconciliation

Forgiveness

Solidarity

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 30: Spirit

Holy Spirit: A Mystical Politics of Liberation

Leveling Spirit: Liberating Struggle in the Revolutionary Atlantic

Toward a Political Theology of Liberating Spirit

References

CHAPTER 31: Church

Israel and the Body of Christ

Christendom and Church

Politically Indirect Ecclesiology

Church as Political

Questions

References

CHAPTER 32: Eschatology

Eschatology and Politics

Israel’s Eschatological History

Augustine

Modernity

The Polity in God

Penultimates

References

IV. Structures and Movements

CHAPTER 33: State and Civil Society

The Advent of the Modern State and Civil Society

The Dominant Tradition

The Emergent Tradition

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 34: Democracy

The Nature of Democracy

Christianity and Democracy

Democratic Transition and Transformation

Faith Communities and Civil Society

Critical Theology and Prophetic Witness

The Church as Democratic Model

The Future of Democracy

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 35: Critical Theory

Resonances with Critical Theory and Marx

New Constellations: Political Theology and Critical Theory

Is Public Theology Regressive with Respect to Political Theology?

References

Further Reading

CHAPTER 36: Postmodernism

The Question of Epochs

The Grammar of Being

The Relation of Analogy

Modernity and the “Representation” of Subjects

Postmodern “Cleanness”

Events of Grace

Acknowledgments

References

CHAPTER 37: Postcolonialism

Postcolonial Discourse: Background

Postcolonial Biblical/Theological Reclamations

Postcolonial Reconfigurations of Liberation and Vernacular Theologies

Criticisms and Challenges

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 38: Political Economy

Gift and Livelihood from Adam to Christ

Wealth and Poverty from Augustine to Malthus

The Retrieval of Divine Economy from F. D. Maurice to

Laudato Si

 ’

References

CHAPTER 39: Technology and Information

Information Technology and Modern Politics

Technology as a Catalyst for Political Utopias with Religious Roots

Technology as Dominion Over Nature

Technology in a Postnatural Condition: Systems, Information, and Power

Theological Responses to Technology in the Postnatural Condition: Some Ways Forward

References

CHAPTER 40: Grassroots Social Movements

Introduction

Focus

Defining Grassroots Social Movements

Religion, Politics, and Grassroots Social Movements

Examples from Past History

Examples from the Nineteenth Century to the Present

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 41: Postsecular Political Theology

Postsecular Political Theology

Postsecularism

Postmodernity

From Metaphysics to Phenomenology

The Return of Religion

Deconstruction and Political Ethics

Messianism and Democracy

Postsecular Theology

Against the Postsecular

The Presecular

Conclusion

References

Further Reading

V. Abrahamic Perspectives

CHAPTER 42: The Islamic Quest for Sociopolitical Justice

Relevance of History

Sources of Political Thought

The Impact of the West

Islamic Revolts and Reforms

Ideas of Sociopolitical Justice

The Meaning of Liberation

Equality

Alleviation of Poverty

Protest Against Oppression

Comparisons

Conclusion

References

CHAPTER 43: Abrahamic Theopolitics Revisited

Abrahamic Theopolitics

The Experiment of Scriptural Reasoning (SR)

Hearth to Hearth Peacebuilding

Program and Institution Building

References

Index

End User License Agreement

List of Illustrations

Chapter 43

Figure 43.1 Training Manual diagram.

Guide

Cover

Table of Contents

Begin Reading

Pages

ii

iii

iv

ix

x

xi

xii

xiii

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

13

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

95

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

164

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

327

328

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

336

337

338

339

340

341

342

343

344

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

361

363

364

365

366

367

368

369

370

371

372

373

374

375

376

377

378

379

380

381

382

383

384

385

386

387

388

389

390

391

392

393

394

395

396

397

398

399

400

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

411

412

413

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

422

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

431

432

433

434

435

436

437

438

439

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

448

449

450

451

452

453

454

455

456

457

459

460

461

462

463

464

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

472

473

474

475

476

477

478

479

480

481

482

483

484

485

486

487

488

489

490

491

492

493

494

495

496

497

498

499

500

501

502

503

504

505

506

507

508

509

510

511

512

513

514

515

516

517

518

519

520

521

522

523

524

525

526

527

528

529

530

531

532

533

534

535

536

537

538

539

540

541

542

543

544

545

546

547

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

560

561

562

563

564

565

566

567

568

569

570

571

572

573

574

575

576

577

578

579

580

581

582

583

584

587

589

590

591

592

593

594

595

596

597

598

599

600

601

602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

614

615

616

617

618

619

620

621

622

623

624

625

626

627

628

629

630

631

632

633

634

635

636

637

638

639

640

641

642

643

644

645

646

647

648

The Wiley Blackwell Companions to Religion

The Wiley Blackwell Companions to Religion series presents a collection of the most recent scholarship and knowledge about world religions. Each volume draws together newly commissioned essays by distinguished authors in the field, and is presented in a style which is accessible to undergraduate students, as well as scholars and the interested general reader. These volumes approach the subject in a creative and forward‐thinking style, providing a forum in which leading scholars in the field can make their views and research available to a wider audience.

Recently Published

The Blackwell Companion to Religion in AmericaEdited by Philip GoffThe Blackwell Companion to JesusEdited by Delbert BurkettThe Blackwell Companion to PaulEdited by Stephen WesterholmThe Blackwell Companion to Religion and ViolenceEdited by Andrew R. MurphyThe Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics, Second EditionEdited by Stanley Hauerwas and Samuel WellsThe Wiley Blackwell Companion Practical TheologyEdited by Bonnie J. Miller‐McLemoreThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Social JusticeEdited by Michael D. Palmer and Stanley M. BurgessThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Chinese ReligionsEdited by Randall L. NadeauThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to African ReligionsEdited by Elias Kifon BongmbaThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Christian MysticismEdited by Julia A. LammThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Anglican CommunionEdited by Ian S. Markham, J. Barney Hawkins IV, Justyn Terry, and Leslie Nuñez SteffensenThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Interreligious DialogueEdited by Catherine CornilleThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to East and Inner Asian BuddhismEdited by Mario PoceskiThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Latino/a TheologyEdited by Orlando O. EspínThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Ancient IsraelEdited by Susan NiditchThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to PatristicsEdited by Ken ParryThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to World ChristianityEdited by Lamin Sanneh and Michael J. McClymondThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Politics and Religion in AmericaEdited by Barbara A. McGrawThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and EcologyBy John HartThe Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology, Second EditionEdited by William T. Cavanaugh and Peter Manley Scott

The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology

Second Edition

Edited by

William T. Cavanaugh

Peter Manley Scott

This second edition first published 2019© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Edition HistoryBlackwell Publishing Ltd. (1e, 2004)

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

The right of William T. Cavanaugh and Peter Manley Scott to be identified as the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.

Registered OfficesJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

Editorial OfficeThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.

Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data

Names: Cavanaugh, William T., 1962- editor. | Scott, Peter Manley, 1961- editor.Title: The Wiley Blackwell companion to political theology / edited by William T. Cavanaugh, Peter Manley Scott.Description: Second edition. | Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, 2018. | Series: Wiley Blackwell Companions to Religion | Includes bibliographical references and index. |Identifiers: LCCN 2018037382 (print) | LCCN 2018057114 (ebook) | ISBN 9781119133735 (Adobe PDF) | ISBN 9781119133742 (ePub) | ISBN 9781119133711 (hardcover) Subjects: LCSH: Political theology. Classification: LCC BR115.P7 (ebook) | LCC BR115.P7 B634 2018 (print) | DDC 261.7- dc23LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018037382

Cover Design: WileyCover Image: © THEPALMER/Getty Images

Notes on Contributors

Nicholas Adams is Professor of Philosophical Theology, University of Birmingham, UK.

Mario I. Aguilar is Professor of Religion and Politics, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK.

J. Matthew Ashley is Associate Professor of Systematic Theology at the University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.

Frederick Christian Bauerschmidt is Professor of Theology at Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Michael J. Baxter is Director of Catholic Studies, Regis University, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Daniel M. Bell, Jr is an independent scholar who for nearly two decades was Professor of Theology and Ethics at Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Andrew Bradstock is a Professor in the Department of Theology, Religion, and Philosophy at the University of Winchester, UK.

Agnes M. Brazal is Associate Professor and Research Fellow, De la Salle University, Manila, Philippines.

Luke Bretherton is Professor of Theological Ethics, Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Walter Brueggemann is William Marcellus McPheeters Professor Emeritus of Old Testament at Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, Georgia, USA.

Michael S. Burdett is Assistant Professor of Christian Theology at the University of Nottingham, UK.

William T. Cavanaugh is Professor of Catholic Studies and Director of the Center for World Catholicism and Intercultural Theology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

M. Shawn Copeland is Professor of Systematic Theology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.

John W. de Gruchy is Emeritus Professor of Christian Studies at the University of Cape Town and Extraordinary Professor of Theology at Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

Jean Bethke Elshtain (1941–2013) was Laura Spelman Rockefeller Professor of Social and Political Ethics in the University of Chicago Divinity School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Roberto S. Goizueta is Margaret O'Brien Flatley Professor Emeritus of Catholic Theology at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.

Timothy J. Gorringe is Emeritus Professor of Theology, University of Exeter, UK.

Elaine Graham is Grosvenor Research Professor of Practical Theology, University of Chester, UK.

Stanley Hauerwas is Gilbert T. Rowe Emeritus Professor of Divinity and Law, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Marsha Aileen Hewitt is Professor of Religion in the Faculty of Divinity, Trinity College and the Department for the Study of Religion, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Michael Hollerich is Professor of Theology at the University of St Thomas in St Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Gavin Hyman is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University, UK.

Robert W. Jenson (1930–2017) was Senior Scholar for Research at the Center of Theological Inquiry in Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Pantelis Kalaitzidis is Director of the Volos Academy for Theological Studies, Volos, Greece, and Lecturer of Systematic Theology at the Hellenic Open University, Athens, Greece.

Emmanuel Katongole is Associate Professor of Theology and Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.

Bustami Mohamed Khir was formerly a member of the Graduate Institute of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, UK.

Kwok Pui‐lan is Distinguished Visiting Professor of Theology at Candler School of Theology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Michael S. Northcott is Emeritus Professor of Ethics at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Peter Ochs is Edgar Bronfman Professor of Modern Judaic Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Wolfgang Palaver is Professor of Catholic Social Thought, University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Elizabeth Phillips is Visiting Scholar in the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge and Honorary Fellow in the Department of Theology and Religion, Durham University, UK.

Catherine Pickstock is Norris‐Hulse Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge, UK. She is currently completing two manuscripts, Aspects of Truth and Platonic Poetics.

Aloysius Pieris is Founder‐Director of the Tulana Research Centre, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

Marcus Pound is Associate Professor of Contemporary Theology, Durham University, UK.

R. R. Reno is Editor of First Things, New York, USA.

Joerg Rieger is Distinguished Professor of Theology and Cal Turner Chancellor’s Chair in Wesleyan Studies, Divinity School and Graduate Department of Religion, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Christopher Rowland is Dean Ireland Professor Emeritus of the Exegesis of Holy Scripture at the University of Oxford, UK.

Raymund Schwager (1935–2004) was Professor of Systematic Theology, University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Peter Manley Scott is Samuel Ferguson Professor of Applied Theology and Director of the Lincoln Theological Institute, University of Manchester, UK.

Kathryn Tanner is Frederick Marquand Professor of Systematic Theology, Yale Divinity School, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Mark Lewis Taylor is Professor of Theology and Culture in the Theology Department and Religion and Society Program, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Bernd Wannenwetsch is Professor of Systematic Theology and Ethics at Freie Theologische Hochschule Giessen, Germany.

William Werpehowski is the McDevitt Professor of Catholic Theology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Haddon Willmer is Emeritus Professor of Theology at the University of Leeds, UK.

Acknowledgments

The editors would like to thank our then commissioning editor, Rebecca Harkin, who was from the beginning supportive of the idea of publishing a second edition. During the early stages of developing and commissioning the volume, Gary Keogh, then in the Department of Religions and Theology at the University of Manchester, gave us valuable editorial help.

We would like to thank the team at Wiley Blackwell, especially Umar Saleem and Jake Opie, for their work during the production process. Jennifer Finstrom, Charlotte Byrd, and Zoe Knight at the University Center for Writing‐based Learning at DePaul University have done a wonderful job in compiling the index, and we are deeply grateful for their hard work.

Preparing a volume of 43 essays for the press and then for publication has been a large undertaking. We would like to thank contributors, new and returning, for their writing, their willingness to respond to queries, and their patience.

William T. CavanaughPeter Manley Scott

Introduction to the Second Edition

William T. Cavanaugh and Peter Manley Scott

A Second Edition

It is now nearly 15 years since the first edition of the Blackwell Companion to Political Theology was published. Since 2004, the topic of political theology has become more important, evident in the number of publications that have populated the field and in the use of the term in nontheological contexts.

The original edition of the volume was an introduction to and survey of the field. With the September 11, 2001, attacks still fresh in memory, the Companion gave an overview of the resources of the Christian tradition for political engagement, the important figures in political theology, the theological themes of political theology, an account of sociopolitical structures in theological perspective, and other Abrahamic faiths’ engagement with political theology. Such an approach was vital at that particular time and the steady sales of the volume indicate that it met – and still meets – an important need. However, debates over terrorism, fresh social developments, the growth of the field, and the interpretation of political theology by nontheological disciplines now require an augmentation of the first edition.

Since 2004, a new context has emerged characterized by increasing recognition of the shift in Christianity’s center of gravity to the global South. Fresh developments and movements must also now be considered: the urgency of climate change, virtuality and the digital age, the economic crisis of 2008, the discourse of religion and violence, and new modalities of war, among others. This revised and extended second edition of the Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology will address all of these changes. The growth of Christianity in the global South has been addressed by recruiting further contributors from this area and by commissioning chapters on topics – such as postcolonialism – of high significance to the global South. New chapters addressing social developments and movements have been commissioned. The use of the term “political theology” beyond theology is also analyzed, as are shifts within the field of political theology (for example, by reference to the political economy).

A comprehensive diagnosis of these developments is well beyond the reach of this introduction. We would be remiss, however, if we did not at least note recent shifts in the discourse surrounding the nation‐state. Following the putative “end of history” and the triumph of capitalism over communism in the 1990s, many either celebrated the fading of the relevance of national borders or worried that nation‐states no longer possessed the power to resist the worst effects of globalization, especially in parts of the global South with “failed states.” More recently, by contrast, a resurgence of nationalism in Europe and the United States has called into question the idea that national sovereignty is fading in relevance in the face of the dominance of transnational capital. National identity can still apparently mobilize grievances and political movements against a loose set of realities labeled “globalization.” It remains to be seen, however, whether or not nationalism is truly opposed to transnational capitalism or is in some sense a wholly or partially owned subsidiary of it. State and market, government and corporation, have become so densely intertwined that simple oppositions of nation‐state versus globalization obscure more than they illuminate. In the United States, for example, the current resort to oxymorons like “billionaire populist” and “nationalist CEO of a global business empire” indicates that the reality is considerably more complex.

The resurgence of nationalism might, however, help shed light on another much‐discussed development related to political theology, the “resurgence of religion.” Questioning the salience of the “secularization thesis” – the idea that modernity brings with it, inevitably, the progressive fading of religion’s social power and political relevance – is nothing new. The “resurgence of religion” has been much discussed at least since Peter Berger and others recanted their previous assertions of the law‐like character of secularization in the 1990s. By then, the phenomenal growth of Christianity in the global South, the vitality of liberation theology, the rise of militant Islam, and a host of other factors had led most to abandon the secularization thesis, at least in its basic form. What is new since the first edition of this volume, however, is the increasing attention paid within political theology to genealogies of the term “religion” and the religious/secular dichotomy. In the wake of Wilfred Cantwell Smith, Talal Asad, and others, scholars have shown the historical contingency of the religious/secular binary, and many have argued, in a Durkheimian vein, that a religion is whatever acts like one. There is nothing essentially religious that is shared by Christianity and Theravada Buddhism and Hinduism on the one hand, and not by so‐called “secular” phenomena like nationalism and Marxism and free‐market ideology on the other. Secularization may not name the process by which the secular waxes and the religious wanes; it might name the process by which the very religious/secular distinction is constructed and the ideology by which this construction is presented to the world as a fact about the nature of things.

When we thought we agreed on what “religion” was, we could argue about whether it was fading or making a comeback. To many practitioners of political theology today, however, “religion” is not resurgent because it never really went away, although it may now take different forms. What the term “political theology” names, then, is the recognition that politics never was drained of the sacred; the primary locus of the sacred merely shifted from church to nation‐state and market. This was the central insight of Carl Schmitt when he launched the twentieth‐century discourse of “political theology”: the form of state sovereignty was borrowed from God’s sovereignty, and the miracle morphed into the ruler’s ability to decide on the extra‐legal exception.

What Is Political Theology?

Since the appearance of the first edition of this volume, the term “political theology” has been used more and more widely. One of us has argued that the term “political theology” identifies the relation between salvation and power, between divine action and political order (Scott 2008). Three uses of the term are identified: the relation between public and private, the transcendence of present political circumstances, and the theological discussion of salvation and power. Taken with the changes and developments outlined in the previous section, these constitute a new context for political theology. This Companion operates with an expansive understanding of what is encompassed by the term “political theology.” Theology is broadly understood as discourse about God, and human persons and other creatures as they relate to God. The political is broadly understood as the use of structural power to organize a society or community. Under this spacious rubric, politics may be understood for the purpose of a political theology in terms of the self‐governance of communities and individuals; this rubric goes beyond Max Weber’s more circumscribed definition of politics as seeking state power. Political theology is, then, the analysis and criticism of political arrangements (including cultural–psychological, social, and economic aspects) from the perspective of differing interpretations of God’s ways with the world.

For the purposes of this volume, political theology is construed primarily as Christian political theology. Not only would the inclusion of other faiths have made an already fat volume unwieldy, but the term “political theology” was coined in a Christian context and has continued to be a significant term within Christian discourse. Two points need to be made about this account. First of all, we wish to stress that the political theologies presented in this volume are concerned always with the matter of theological excess. Political theology is not reducible to politics: in the relation between salvation and power, priority is to be given to salvation. This leads to a second point: since 2004, there has been a growth in what we shall here call “secular” political theology, that is, a style of political theology which regards God as a fiction – a fiction to be taken seriously but a fiction nonetheless. The work of secular thinkers influenced by Carl Schmitt is exemplary here: Paul Kahn, Giorgio Agamben, et al. Such a style of political theology is to be contrasted with traditioned or theological political theology which works from an interpretation of the reality of God. It is this second style that populates this Companion. (In Chapter 41 an account of the content and emergence of Schmittian “secular” political theology is offered in addition.)

Within this general framework, the task of political theology is conceived in different ways by different thinkers. For some, politics is seen as a “given” with its own secular autonomy. Politics and theology are therefore two essentially distinct activities, one to do with public authority, and the other to do in the first place with religious experience and the semi‐private associations of religious believers. The task of political theology might be to relate religious belief to larger societal issues while not confusing the proper autonomy of each.

For others, theology is critical reflection on the political. Theology is material and reflects and reinforces just or unjust political arrangements. The task of political theology might then be to expose the ways in which theological discourse reproduces inequalities of class, gender, or race, and to reconstruct theology so that it serves the cause of justice.

For still others, theology and politics are essentially similar activities; both are constituted in the production of metaphysical images around which communities are organized. All politics has theology embedded within it, and particular forms of organization are implicit in doctrines of, for example, Trinity, the church and eschatology. The task then might become one of exposing the false theologies underlying supposedly “secular” politics and promoting the true politics implicit in a true theology.

Political theologies vary in the extent to which social sciences and other secular discourses are employed; the extent to which they are “contextualized” or rooted in a particular people’s experience; the extent to which the state is seen as the locus of politics; and the ways in which theological resources – scripture, liturgy, doctrine – are employed. What distinguishes all political theology from other types of theology or political discourse is the explicit attempt to relate discourse about God to the organization of bodies in space and time.

A Brief History of Political Theology

In one sense, there has been Christian political theology as long as there has been Christianity. Jesus proclaimed a “kingdom” of God that was at hand, and he was executed as a failed rex iudaeorum. Christians throughout the history of the church have searched the Old Testament for models of faithful kingship, and have puzzled over whether Romans 13 or Revelation 13 gives a more trustworthy model for engagement with the powers that be. When the Christians themselves assumed coercive power after Constantine, there was no neat separation of political from theological issues. Questions of good governance were always questions of how God rules the world. In the Middle Ages, there were priests and there were kings, but the unity of the two roles in Christ guaranteed overlap between ecclesiastical and civil authority, and the two kinds of authority did not correspond to “religion” and “politics,” which is a modern distinction. At least until the Investiture Controversy in the eleventh century, kings had liturgical functions, and even in late medieval apologies for the relative independence of civil authority from ecclesiastical power, the role of the king was understood as integral to the promotion of the people’s salvation. Arguments over all these matters were conducted on the basis of scriptural exegesis and with the deployment of doctrines of creation, fall, Christology, ecclesiology, and eschatology. Arguments over whether the function of government was to inculcate virtue or only to restrain vice, for example, were arguments over whether or not government existed in the garden of Eden; Aquinas thought so, Augustine thought not. In one sense, then, political theology is a constant feature of the Christian tradition.

“Political theology,” however, did not become a term of art until the twentieth century. It is true that Augustine, in his City of God, critiqued the Stoic division of theologies into natural, mythical, and political, the last having to do with the gods of the polis. But there was no such separate field of inquiry in medieval or early modern theology; questions of good governance or good citizenship were treated under the general rubric of moral theology. The modern revival of the term “political theology” can be traced to Mikhail Bakunin’s 1871 text “The Political Theology of Mazzini and the International,” to which Carl Schmitt’s book Political Theology in 1922 was a response. For Bakunin, “political theology” was a term of reproach, part of his critique of religion and its tendency to mystify and distort the “real” material basis on which politics should be situated. For Schmitt, on the other hand, an idiosyncratic Catholic, “political theology” was not simply a hermeneutics of suspicion aimed at critiquing the intrusion of theology into politics, but rather an attempt to put politics on what Schmitt thought was a more sound theological basis. It was this opening to theology that allowed Johannes Baptist Metz to revive the term in the 1960s and rescue it from the bad odor in which the erstwhile Nazi jurist Schmitt had enveloped it.

Recent decades have witnessed the growth of secular political theology that treats God as a serious fiction and seeks to expose the mythification of supposedly secular political processes. Theological political theology, on the other hand, does not begin with Metz, but arguably with Christian attempts to respond to the early twentieth‐century divinization of politics in the forms of nationalism, fascism, and Marxism. Karl Barth’s protest against the cozy relationship between liberal Christianity and German nationalism on the eve of World War I was a watershed moment in the development of political theology, and the subsequent rise of Nazism made the debates more acute. It is no accident that what came to be called “political theology” was forged largely in the German context, as Schmitt, Erik Peterson, Barth, Emmanuel Hirsch, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and many more fought to situate the church in its proper role vis‐à‐vis a political order that had taken on total or god‐like pretensions. Such pretensions in Marxism arguably spurred on the development of Catholic Social Teaching, another precursor to political theology.

The emergence of political theology in the twentieth century is only partially explained by Christian reaction to the emergence of divinized politics, however. The emergence of political theology must be put in the context of the church’s wider loss of political and social power in the West. Across Europe and Latin America in the nineteenth century and into the twentieth, the rise of liberal governments challenged the church’s control over education, marriage, morality, the press, and access to tax revenues. Nationalism at the same time competed for the Christian’s ultimate allegiance. Official separation of church and state came in country after country, and often the divorce was not amicable. In addition to the loss of direct political power, the indirect power of the church began to erode as well; in many places, significant portions of the working class were influenced by Marxist critiques of “religion,” and significant portions of the dominant classes were influenced by Enlightenment critiques and the general trend toward secularization. Political theology, in other words, came into its own as a field of inquiry at the moment in history when the political power of the Christian churches went into significant decline. It is often the case that one only begins to think deliberately and systematically about a set of issues when there is a crisis, a moment in which previous arrangements have been scrambled and previous certainties have been called into question. Since Constantine there had been many different types of arrangement between civil and ecclesiastical leaders, but the church had generally assumed that God ruled all and that therefore governance was part of the church’s concern. When Christendom finally unraveled, it was time to rethink the relationship of God to politics from the ground up. It may not be a simple coincidence that Carl Schmitt published his Political Theology in the same year that the last Habsburg ruler, Charles I of the Austro‐Hungarian Empire, died.

In some ways, however, it is misleading to say that the Christian church had political power and then lost it. As Timothy Fitzgerald has argued (Fitzgerald 2007 and 2017), the same genealogical work that has been done for the term “religion” can and should also be done for “politics.” Fitzgerald argues that the term “politics” in the current sense of the word was created in the seventeenth century, about the same time that the modern use of “religion” emerged. Politics and religion were not two different natural things that had gotten mixed up and were subsequently separated. They are rather two fabricated categories that made the gradual separation of ecclesiastical power from civil power seem inevitable and natural. Fitzgerald argues that the term “politics” was created by and for “men of substance,” male accumulators of property, often Nonconformists, for whom the power of the established church was an obstacle. If at least the broad outlines of this genealogy are correct, we can suggest that “political theology” is only possible once both “politics” and “religion” have been created as separate realities with a gap between them that begs to be bridged. Political theology emerges when the church finds itself staring across the great divide at politics, which has appropriated the holy for its own purposes.

In the mid‐twentieth century, figures such as Jacques Maritain, Reinhold Niebuhr, and John Courtney Murray addressed the relationship of Christianity to the modern liberal state. Maritain and Murray were trying in different ways to adjust the Catholic Church to a new reality in which it could and would no longer claim that confessional states were the ideal. Niebuhr was trying both to defend American democracy and secure a critical position for Christianity vis‐à‐vis the more inflated pretensions of the world’s first superpower. What came to be labeled “political theology” in the 1960s, however, is usually associated with the attempts by German theologians Johannes Baptist Metz, Jürgen Moltmann, and Dorothee Sölle to deal with the failure of the church to resist the rise of the Nazis to power. They wanted to establish the church as a critical community whose “eschatological proviso” could serve as a check on demonic political power. This type of political theology was a direct inspiration for liberation theology in Latin America, but the Latin American context was different from the European and called for a different response.

For Latin American thinkers like Gustavo Gutiérrez, European political theology was elaborated in and for a bourgeois context. Latin America required a theology based in and for the experience of the poor, who constituted the majority of the population there. Political critique would need also to be economic critique; both the capitalist market and the state that served it would need to be viewed through the critical lens of Jesus’ announcement of an inbreaking Kingdom of God. In their attempt to root theology in the concrete praxis of a particular social location, Latin American liberation theologies served as a powerful model for the proliferation of contextual theologies rooted either in a geographical location or in the experience of marginalized groups, such as blacks, women, gays, and indigenous peoples. Despite the tidiness of the genealogy that moves from Metz to Gutiérrez to liberation theologies worldwide, however, we should note that James Cone’s A Black Theology of Liberation (1970) predated the publication of Gutiérrez’s A Theology of Liberation by a year. Rather than any neat genealogy that traces the emergence of contextual theologies through individual thinkers, it might be more profitable to set the emergence of such theologies in the context of the mid‐century consciousness of oppressed peoples that accompanied anti‐colonial efforts in Africa, the Cuban revolution in Latin America, and the civil rights movement in the United States.

In addition to “political theology” and “liberation theology,” Elizabeth Phillips names “public theology” as the third major movement of the first generation of the political theology that emerged in the latter half of the twentieth century (Phillips 2012: 42–50). Here she means Catholic followers of John Courtney Murray like Richard John Neuhaus, and Protestant followers of Reinhold Niebuhr like Max Stackhouse. Stackhouse distinguishes “public theology,” a mostly US phenomenon, from European “political theology” by saying that the former gives more importance to the communication of theology through the structures of civil society, that is, families, churches, intermediary associations, and culture in general that escapes the direct purview of the state. European political theology, according to Stackhouse, is more state‐centered. Whether or not Metz would agree with this characterization is an open question; in most typologies, nuance is the first casualty. Although any attempt to generalize risks oversimplification, we may fairly say that all three varieties of first generation political theology operate within dichotomies of state/civil society, public/private, and secular/religious.

In the 1990s, two new trends emerge. The first is the widespread use of the term “political theology” to encompass the entire field of inquiry, not restricted to the German theological school that picked it up in the 1960s. Besides Christian traditioned political theology, there develops a parallel field of “secular” political theology among non‐Christian, nontheological thinkers interested in Carl Schmitt. The second trend is the emergence of new types of political theology that break down the dichotomies mentioned above that earlier political theologies took for granted. If there is anything that unites the second generation of political theologies that Phillips identifies (Phillips 2012: 50–54), it is the questioning of these categories, along with categories of race and gender. It is no longer clear, for example, that the secular is a natural, rather than constructed, category or that there is a strong contrast between “humanity” and “nature.” It is no longer evident that the Eucharist is a theological, as opposed to political, reality. The categories of civil society and state – the former seeking to have an impact on the latter – no longer exhaustively describe political space when the church itself is seen as in some sense a political body. The categories of “men” and “women” do not exhaust the gender‐based politics of queer theology. And so on.

Some Conceptual Distinctions

The brief history above is necessarily inexact. It is meant to provide a general sense of the state of the field of Christian political theology. A mapping of all the varieties of political theology is likely to get more contentious, more forced, and less helpful the more detailed it gets. We would, however, like to make some further conceptual distinctions that help identify some crucial dilemmas that face Christian political theology today. At this point we distinguish between post‐Hobbesian and post‐Marxist approaches in traditioned political theology (see Scott 2008). As we shall see, although the energy has been with the post‐Marxists, this approach has now been extended by postliberal traditioned political theologies and other approaches. In exploring these approaches, we may grasp some key difficulties for political theology and provide a theological rationale for the increasing diversity of the field.

A leading representative of the post‐Hobbesian approach is Oliver O’Donovan, who has been the most important voice for the view that a society is politically shaped. O’Donovan writes, “Yet the societies we actually inhabit are politically formed. They depend upon the art of government; they are interested in the very questions from which the study of society abstracts.” This commitment identifies what we are calling the post‐Hobbesian approach. O’Donovan continues, “The epithet ‘social’, however, forecloses the agenda against such questions, often narrowing it to economic matters which are only a fraction of what a living society cares about” (O’Donovan 1996: 16). O’Donovan has in turn applied this criticism to Latin American liberation theology’s embrace of what he calls an “acephalous idea of society.” It is precisely such an emphasis on an idea of society, on O’Donovan’s view, that the post‐Marxist approach unwisely proposes. For O’Donovan, then, there is an important sense in which the activities of political community are restricted – and whether or not such a restriction is convincing is our first key difficulty.

For the post‐Marxist alternative, no such restriction is in sight. Beginning from “society” provides the basis for political theological enquiry. The emphasis here is less on political headship and instead is directed to social relations in which the state may be understood as an “expression” of preceding society. This is theological enquiry ordered to action in society. For example, Metz has provided a programmatic statement: “Human society is seen primarily as an essential medium for the discovery of theological truth and for Christian preaching in general” (Metz 1970: 35). Given, as we have seen, that Metz is heir to the crisis in European theology occasioned by two world wars, it is unsurprising that critical attention is given to “the conditions of present‐day society.” In this emphasis, he has been joined by many theologians working in traditioned political theology. Of less importance in this approach are church–state relationships as these, as we have noted, are reconfigured in many countries in the first half of the twentieth century. Theological attention is now paid to society as the sphere of Christian action.

This divergence in the field between post‐Hobbesian and post‐Marxist trajectories reveals differing interpretations of “society” and the location of Christian responsibility and action. A second issue now emerges that may be summarized in the form of a question posed by Ernst‐Wolfgang Böckenförde: “Is the liberal secular state nourished by normative preconditions that it cannot itself guarantee?” (cited in Habermas 2006: 251). There are stronger and weaker interpretations of this thesis, but such differences need not detain us here. Nonetheless, the core issue raises the difficult matter of how political theology should respond. Should traditioned political theology offer resources for the nourishment of these normative preconditions that the liberal secular state cannot itself supply?

Putting the issue in this way clarifies the social and epistemological conditions for the emergence of “public theology.” For, we might say, public theology is recruited to address this normative deficit. (Nor is public theology any longer restricted to the West but has also been promoted in South Asia [Wilfred 2010], indicating that the lineaments of the liberal state are present also in the global South.) The thorny issue for public theology is its role regarding this normative deficit of a liberal society. What precisely is its function as regards this deficit? Whatever view we take on this, it is hard to escape the conclusion that public theology is derivative: it emerges as the condition of its emergence – the liberal public realm – deteriorates. If the Böckenförde thesis is accurate, public theology is thereby a function of liberal society and is created as that society’s operating system crashes. In attempting to recover “normative preconditions,” public theology thereby risks performing an obscuring or ideological role and raises the question as to whether this is a suitable task for theology.

Such a critical assessment of public theology is helpful but has not fully addressed our present issue. For we still do not know whether traditioned political theology offers resources for the nourishment of normative preconditions that the liberal secular state cannot itself supply. This in turn brings us to a third difficulty: the relation between liberal, secular society and traditioned political theology. Given the history of political theology traced in the previous section, it is easy to appreciate why this is a difficult matter for traditioned political theology to address. As we have said, the origin of recent political theology is as a response to anti‐democratic developments in Europe and as a contribution to anti‐colonial movements elsewhere. What then of its relation to liberal, secular society?

There is more than one answer to this question. The tidy answer would be that traditioned political theology develops two responses. The first response is deeply informed by an awareness – born out of historical experience, as we have seen – of potential threats to democracy (Jürgen Moltmann). In some formulations such an approach commends aspects of the liberal state and so brings itself uncomfortably close to a form of public theology. A recurring difficulty here is how such a traditioned political theology handles a programmatic secularism (Rowan Williams) that may be seen to exclude the religious. A second response is more concerned by the dangers of a “democratic” culture (John Milbank). A difficulty here is that such an approach may bring political theology too close to Schmitt’s Restorationist Christianity – although efforts to demonstrate that this position is closer to political repair than to political restoration can be seen in, for example, Blue Labour and Red Tory movements in the UK.

The untidy answer would refer, as we have already done, to the postsecular (and also probably indicate the limits of the usefulness of the term, “post‐Marxist”). From this perspective, and not least by reference to changes in civil society, the field of traditioned political theology proliferates by exploring issues and movements that include but also go beyond race, class, and gender – especially issues of sexuality, belonging, disability, and environment. Even, paradoxically, political theology hosts the return of theology resourcing a political project (Ivan Petrella), although it is not clear that this is an argument from a traditioned political theology. Not least, fresh theological consideration of the state (and the nation) has led to further distancing from church/state relations and to proposals for a Christian anarchism. As such, relations between religious communities, society, and the state are understood to be ever more complex in a developing postsecular circumstance.

However, it would be wrong to argue that political theology’s concerns are to be derived solely from context. A fourth key difficulty is now more easily appreciated. This difficulty is to give a persuasive account of the relation between theological concepts and political concepts. The discussion of this relation has been dominated by the reception of Schmitt’s writings but this relation is present in traditioned political theology also. In other words, traditioned political theology has a domain and a history – articulated in the previous section – but also a theological mode of enquiry (Simmons 2017) in which precisely how Christianity/the Gospel/the church is inherently political needs to be elaborated.

As will be clear from this and the previous section, in our account of the emergence of political theology we have stressed the priority of salvation over power, the affirmation of the “reality” of God rather than God as a serious fiction, and the accelerated development of political theology out of twentieth‐century European experience and crisis. Throughout, we have stressed that the meaning of political theology is not only a matter of scope – what is politics and how does theology cover it – but of a theological mode of enquiry in which various ways are presented of transcribing the theological into the political. This imperative toward transcription is not accidental or external but is inscribed in the dynamic of political theology itself insofar as theology is responsive to salvation.

What’s in This Companion?

The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Political Theology has a dual purpose. On the one hand, it is meant to serve as a reference tool. Each chapter is designed to present the reader with an overview of the range of opinion on a given topic, and to guide the reader toward sources representing those views. On the other hand, the Companion presents original and constructive chapters on the various topics by leading voices in political theology today. Our authors have been instructed to be fair, but not to feign neutrality. The views of the author should and do become clear in the course of each chapter, and the authors make many original claims that take the discussion of political theology in new and provocative directions. The result, we trust, is a lively argument within a fascinating and diverse group of scholars.

Our choice of topics and authors has followed the same hope. We have tried to give a voice at the table to a great variety of different views that accurately reflect the state of the conversation today. All the same, some readers may be disappointed by the exclusion of some topics and puzzled by the inclusion of others. Here we must lament the