11,99 €
What does college teach, really? As demands for accountability intensify, meaningful measurement of broad college outcomes becomes increasingly important. Here, you'll take a journey through the history of assessment instruments, starting with the creation of the first general outcomes assessment tools in the 1980s. You'll follow the evolution of the tools, writing and critical thinking, and finally the concept of value-added analysis, an appealing but elusive goal for assessors.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 129
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2011
Contents
Introduction: Assessing the Generic Outcomes of College: Selections from “Assessment Measures”
Commercially Available Measures
Writing Assessment
Assessing Critical Thinking
Assessing Value Added
A Concluding Note
Section One: General Education Assessment
Instruments for Assessing General Education Outcomes
The College Outcome Measures Program (COMP) Examination
Joint Task Force of the Interinstitutional Committee of Academic Officers and State Board for Community College Education
Criteria for Evaluating Assessment Instruments
The College Basic Academic Subjects Examination
The Academic Profile II
The Collegiate Learning Assessment
Content
Administration and Score Reports
Psychometric Properties
Section Two: Writing Assessment
Designing Comprehensive Writing Assessments
Implementing a Large-Scale Writing Assessment
Section Three: Critical Thinking Assessment
Assessing the Critical Thinking Abilities of College Students
The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal
The California Critical Thinking Skills Test
Tasks in Critical Thinking
The Reflective Judgment Interview
The CRESST Problem-Solving Measures
A New Approach to Measuring Critical Thinking
Reliability and Validity Results
Section Four: Value-Added Assessment
Freshman-to-Senior Gains at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Methods of Evaluating Student Change During College
Revisiting the Blind Alley of Value Added
Research-Based Conclusions About Value Added
A Brief Explanation of Value-Added Concerns
Alternative Measures
Conclusion
Copyright © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Published by Jossey-Bass
A Wiley Imprint
989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 www.josseybass.com
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-8789, fax 201-748-6326, www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.
Jossey-Bass also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data available upon request
INTRODUCTION
Assessing the Generic Outcomes of College: Selections from “Assessment Measures”
The broad outcomes of a college education have been described using a variety of terms, including general education outcomes and generic skills or outcomes. I am particularly fond of Baird’s (1988) characterization of these outcomes as the “diverse and subtle arts.” Although the outcomes have gone by many names, higher education leaders and policy makers have consistently stressed the importance of the generic outcomes of college. Both the National Education Goals Panel (1991) and the Secretary of Education’s (Spellings) Commission on the Future of Higher Education (U.S. Department of Education, 2006), for example, stressed the importance of assessing and improving the generic skills of critical thinking, communicating, and problem-solving. Given this high level of interest, it is not surprising that a significant number of “Assessment Measures” columns have focused on issues related to the assessment of the generic outcomes of a college education. Many of these columns are included in this collection, and they can be grouped into four broad categories: (1) commercially available measures of general education outcomes, (2) writing assessment, (3) assessment of critical thinking, and (4) assessing the value added by a college education. The first three categories roughly correspond to the content areas identified in major national reports, and the final category includes columns focusing on how best to represent the unique contributions of a college education.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!