0,49 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Quickie Classics
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
Set in the years around the 1832 Reform Bill, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life interweaves Dorothea Brooke's thwarted idealism, Lydgate's medical ambitions, and the Vincys' fortunes into a patient anatomy of a town. With an omniscient, gently ironic narrator and masterly free indirect discourse, Eliot builds a realist web where marriage, vocation, religion, finance, and politics reveal how private desires buckle under communal pressures. George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans)—translator of Strauss and Feuerbach and former editor of the Westminster Review—wrote from rigorous engagement with German thought, positivist science, and provincial memory. Her partnership with George Henry Lewes, skepticism toward doctrinal certainties, and Warwickshire upbringing supplied the psychological tact and historical imagination that let her test moral ideals against the everyday compromises of nineteenth-century professional and domestic life. Readers seeking a novel that thinks as keenly as it feels will find Middlemarch inexhaustible: exact in social detail, generous in sympathy, unsparing about vanity and failure. It rewards patient attention and invites rereading, making it essential for students of Victorian culture, political reform, gender and work, and for any reader who values moral seriousness without dogma. Quickie Classics summarizes timeless works with precision, preserving the author's voice and keeping the prose clear, fast, and readable—distilled, never diluted. Enriched Edition extras: Introduction · Synopsis · Historical Context · Author Biography · Brief Analysis · 4 Reflection Q&As · Editorial Footnotes.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2026
Ähnliche
Middlemarch (Summarized Edition)
Table of Contents
Introduction
Balancing the urge toward exalted purpose with the stubborn facts of ordinary life, Middlemarch explores how the desire to be good, useful, and significant is braided into a town’s dense web of obligations, misunderstandings, and historical change, revealing that every personal choice—about love, work, money, and belief—unfolds not in the open air of solitary freedom but in a shared atmosphere where motives are mixed, knowledge is partial, and character is tested by the patient frictions of time, community, and circumstance, and that fulfillment, however envisioned, must negotiate the claims of others and the slow, often unseen, consequences of one’s actions.
Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life is a Victorian realist novel by George Eliot, the pen name of Mary Ann Evans. First published in parts between 1871 and 1872, it portrays a fictional town in the English Midlands during the era surrounding the Reform Bill of 1832. Eliot situates private dramas within a carefully observed social and historical setting, where medical practice, clerical life, commerce, and local politics intersect. The result is a panoramic portrait of provincial society that bridges intimate feeling and public change, drawing on the moral imagination and empirical detail associated with nineteenth-century realism.
At its outset, the novel introduces two central figures whose ambitions illuminate the town’s wider patterns. Dorothea Brooke, an earnest young woman of means, longs for a life of moral purpose and intellectual labor, and believes marriage might be a path to that vocation. Meanwhile, Tertius Lydgate, a newly arrived physician, hopes to reshape medical practice through scientific method and independence. Around them gather families, clergy, merchants, and professionals whose expectations, debts, and friendships braid the plots together. The novel’s early movements set these aspirations against the ordinary rhythms of courtship, work, and rumor, inviting readers into a living social web.
Eliot’s narrative voice is omniscient yet intimately attentive, moving among characters with an ironic steadiness that is never cruel and a sympathy that is never sentimental. The prose is patient, exact, and reflective, pausing to test motives, analyze habits, and weigh consequences, while also advancing scenes of lively talk and intricate social maneuver. Readers encounter shifting perspectives that enlarge understanding rather than stage surprises, and the book’s architecture rewards slow accumulation over abrupt turns. The tone balances sobriety with wit, and the style marries psychological acuity to a historian’s sense of context, producing a reading experience at once rigorous and humane.
Among its central concerns are idealism and compromise, the ethics of vocation, and the ways money and status shape feeling without fully determining it. The novel examines marriage as a field of work and mutual education, not merely an outcome of romance. It probes the limits of knowledge—what we can see of ourselves and others—and the slow discipline by which character is formed. Political reform, religious commitment, and scientific innovation figure as evolving frameworks for individual choice. Above all, the book insists on connectedness: actions ripple through households and institutions, binding strangers in consequence and offering sympathy as a measure of wisdom.
For contemporary readers, Middlemarch offers a clear mirror for questions about ambition, care, and responsibility within complex systems. Its portrait of professional ethics speaks to today’s debates about expertise and reform; its attention to women’s aspirations and constrained opportunities invites reflection on ongoing struggles for equity. The novel’s sensitivity to how information circulates—through rumor, reputation, and institutional authority—resonates with modern concerns about influence and trust. By depicting moral growth as a patient practice shaped by community, it counters quick-fix ideologies and celebrates durable sympathy. In an age of accelerated change, its steady gaze restores proportion and deepens civic imagination.
To approach Middlemarch is to consent to its breadth: a community studied with the care one might give to a landscape, where each path reveals new crossings. Reading slowly highlights the novel’s textures—its humor, its ethical poise, its delicate shifts in perspective—and allows relationships to gather meaning without manufactured shocks. The opening situations establish stakes that deepen rather than simplify, and the narrative’s patience yields cumulative power. Eliot invites readers to practice attention and sympathy alongside her characters, and the reward is a capacious understanding of ordinary life as a site of significance, courage, and hard-won clarity.
Synopsis
Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life, published by George Eliot in 1871–72, portrays a Midlands community during the years surrounding the first Reform Bill. The narrative interlaces several households and professions to study how private motives intersect with public change. It centers on Dorothea Brooke, a young woman searching for moral purpose; Tertius Lydgate, an ambitious physician; Fred Vincy, a genial but aimless young man; and the influential banker Nicholas Bulstrode. Around them gathers a populous town of families, clergy, professionals, and tenants. Through sober observation rather than melodrama, the novel traces choices, obligations, and misunderstandings as they develop within provincial routines and national debates.
Dorothea Brooke, guided by her uncle Mr. Brooke on his country estate, longs for a life of usefulness and moral clarity. Disdaining fashionable display, she aspires to serve some greater intellectual and philanthropic end. Courted by the considerate Sir James Chettam, she instead is drawn to the older clergyman-scholar Edward Casaubon, whose vast research promises a serious partnership. Dorothea imagines helping to advance his life’s work and accepts a role she believes will fuse duty with purpose. Their engagement raises doubts among friends and relations, anticipating a marriage in which her lofty hopes meet the complexities of temperament, expectations, and unequal experience.
On her wedding journey in Rome, Dorothea encounters both the weight of antiquity and Casaubon’s daunting scholarly ambitions. There she meets Will Ladislaw, Casaubon’s younger cousin, whose artistic and political interests present a contrast to her husband’s severity. Casaubon’s unease about Will’s presence underscores tensions that Dorothea cannot easily resolve. Returning to Middlemarch, she turns to estate improvements and charitable schemes as practical outlets for her ideals. Periods of strain and ill health enter the household, while Will later comes to town through Mr. Brooke’s ventures, joining reform-minded conversations. Dorothea’s task becomes balancing obedience, generosity, and independence in a community quick to interpret her conduct.
Dr. Tertius Lydgate arrives in Middlemarch determined to modernize medical practice. Trained in new scientific methods, he seeks to specialize in pathology and to reform the casual routines of the old guard. He allies with Mr. Bulstrode, whose funding promises a new hospital and research opportunities, though the partnership brings obligations and local suspicions. Lydgate’s confidence and decisions strain relations with established practitioners and patients wary of innovation. Amid his work, he meets Rosamond Vincy, accomplished and socially ambitious, whose admiration for refinement and status attracts him. Their mutual charm develops within a town skilled at weighing rank, income, and motive alongside professional merit.
The union of Lydgate and Rosamond binds professional aspiration to domestic taste. Furnishings, lessons, and entertainments soon exceed their means, even as medical controversies limit his practice and the hospital’s support. Lydgate pursues research and stringent economies that few around him share, and he must judge how to balance scientific rigor with the demands of bedside manner. Town factions and patronage complicate his position, drawing him toward accommodations he once scorned. The couple’s differing views of money, prestige, and perseverance turn private disagreements into public constraints, illustrating how ambition, credit, and reputation entwine in a place where every bill and decision becomes common knowledge.
Fred Vincy, Rosamond’s brother, drifts toward adulthood without a settled calling. Counting on favor from his wealthy, ailing uncle Mr. Featherstone, he delays preparation for a profession and accumulates debts. Mary Garth, clear-sighted and principled, challenges Fred’s dependence on luck and urges habits of steady work. Her father, Caleb Garth, an honorable land agent, embodies patience, skill, and trustworthiness in practical affairs. The kindly clergyman Camden Farebrother offers mentoring friendship amid parish duty and modest amusements. As Fred confronts disappointments and obligations, he begins testing whether affection, honest labor, and a realistic sense of worth might replace daydreams of unearned inheritance.
Nicholas Bulstrode’s piety and philanthropy give him influence over credit, charity, and the hospital’s governance. Yet a compromised earlier life shadows his standing, and the later surfacing of damaging knowledge reveals how moral authority is asserted and contested in a small town. Public judgment gathers quickly, entangling families and institutions. Lydgate’s association with Bulstrode threatens his independence, forcing him to confront how financial pressure can blur discernment. Dorothea’s desire to act justly places her between competing claims of fact, sympathy, and propriety. Meanwhile, Will Ladislaw’s outsider status keeps him both engaged with and apart from Middlemarch’s tight networks of allegiance and suspicion.
National Reform debates ripple through Middlemarch, turning politics into a mirror of household habits and local pride. Mr. Brooke briefly pursues a parliamentary candidacy, speaking for mild improvements while neglecting the practical management that would lend him authority. He acquires a newspaper, the Pioneer, and engages Will Ladislaw to write, bringing editorials, rallies, and satire into the town’s public life. Elections, petitions, and tavern talk reveal the gap between progressive rhetoric and entrenched custom. Professional guilds, congregations, and families reposition themselves as expectations shift, so that personal fortunes hinge not only on affection or talent, but also on how one speaks and is seen in public.
Across its interlaced plots, Middlemarch studies how ideal hopes meet the limits of circumstance, how money quietly shapes conscience, and how women and men negotiate roles framed by property, law, and custom. Eschewing sensational turns, it emphasizes cumulative consequences: the slow accretion of decisions, evasions, kindnesses, and debts. Its enduring significance rests in a compassionate scrutiny of ordinary lives, suggesting that durable reform and private contentment arise from patient attention to others. By portraying a community where every choice tugs many threads, Eliot invites readers to consider sympathy, responsibility, and the difficult art of doing good without certainty or final triumphal conclusions.
Historical Context
Middlemarch, published 1871–72, is set in the years just before the First Reform Act (chiefly 1829–1832) in a fictional Midlands market town. The world it portrays is provincial Britain, anchored in landed estates, the Anglican parish, country banking, and a self-selecting municipal corporation. Daily life turned on market days, coaching roads, and canal links, with London’s influence arriving slowly. Local institutions—vestry meetings, a subscription hospital, grammar schools, and charitable trusts—shaped status, relief, and authority. George Eliot writes retrospectively about this pre-reform environment, depicting how rank, patronage, and property mediated opportunities and decisions in towns like those of Warwickshire, where she grew up.
National politics impinge directly on the town through the agitation surrounding parliamentary reform. Before 1832, representation was uneven, with "rotten boroughs" and a limited property-based franchise; elections featured open hustings, landlord influence, and routine treating and bribery. The repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts in 1828 and Catholic Emancipation in 1829 signaled change but also provoked conflict. Local newspapers amplified speeches and petitions, while civic elites debated the costs of reform. The First Reform Act of 1832 redistributed seats and modestly expanded the electorate, changes that contemporaries experienced as contentious, noisy, and often personal in provincial communities like Middlemarch.
Economically, early nineteenth-century provincial towns combined agriculture, trades, and small manufacturing with regional markets. Canals and turnpike trusts connected the Midlands to ports and northern industry, while the coaching network moved news and people before railways. The Panic of 1825 had shaken confidence and exposed the fragility of country banks; thereafter joint-stock banks spread outside London under 1826 legislation, yet local credit remained sensitive to rumors. Charitable and civic projects relied on subscriptions and patronage, including hospitals and schools. This environment of cautious investment, visible benefaction, and tight-knit commercial ties underwrites the novel’s attention to reputation, solvency, and public trust.
Medicine in the 1820s–1830s was fragmented and rapidly changing. The Apothecaries Act of 1815 began regulating training, but physicians, surgeons, and apothecaries held distinct, often competing jurisdictions. New clinical methods from Paris, the stethoscope (introduced by Laennec in 1816), and pathological anatomy challenged timeworn treatments like routine bloodletting. Voluntary hospitals were governed by lay subscribers and committees that could resist innovation or scrutinize costs. The 1831–1832 cholera epidemic, entering via Sunderland and spreading inland, intensified disputes over contagion, miasma, and public health. These pressures illuminate the novel’s focus on professional authority, institutional politics, and the town’s reception of medical reform.
Religion structures local identity through the established Church of England and a vigorous Nonconformist presence. Parish life revolves around tithes, vestries, and patronage rights (advowsons), with pluralism and absentee incumbents criticized by reformers. Evangelicalism energized both Anglican and dissenting communities, emphasizing conversion, philanthropy, and moral discipline. Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts (1828) improved Nonconformists’ civic access, while Catholic Emancipation (1829) widened formal toleration, though tensions persisted. Clergymen often held social authority alongside scholarly or pastoral roles. This framework informs the novel’s attention to conscience, respectability, and the practical entanglements of religious conviction with property, patronage, and local power.
Women’s legal and educational circumstances in this period constrain aspiration and action. Under coverture, a married woman’s property was controlled by her husband; significant reforms arrived later (notably the Married Women’s Property Acts of 1870 and 1882). Divorce in the 1830s required a costly private Act of Parliament, effectively barring most litigants until the 1857 Matrimonial Causes Act. University education was closed to women, and respectable occupations were limited to roles such as governess or schoolmistress. Female philanthropy, religious activity, and family alliances offered influence. The novel’s exploration of women’s ambition, duty, and dependence reflects these legal and cultural limits.
George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans, 1819–1880) wrote Middlemarch with historical hindsight, publishing it in eight parts through William Blackwood and Sons between 1871 and 1872. She had translated D. F. Strauss’s Life of Jesus (1846) and Ludwig Feuerbach’s Essence of Christianity (1854), and engaged with European realism and Comtean positivism, shaping her sociological, evidence-minded narrative method. Living in an unconventional partnership with George Henry Lewes, she pursued intellectual independence rare for Victorian women. By setting the story before 1832 yet composing it amid later reforms in law, education, and science, Eliot frames provincial lives within demonstrable national transformations and their moral implications.
Across this backdrop—reform politics, evolving professions, religious contention, and constrained gender roles—the novel examines how personal choices intersect with institutional change. Its provincial canvas mirrors national transitions: electoral modernization after 1832, the slow professionalization of medicine before the 1858 Medical Act, the contest between patronage and merit, and the moral energies of Evangelical philanthropy. Without relying on sensational events, Eliot uses realistic detail—subscriptions, elections, inheritances, and committees—to show how progress can be mixed with compromise. Middlemarch thus reflects and critiques its era by tracing the promises and penalties of reform as they are felt in a carefully observed English town.
Author Biography
George Eliot, the pen name of Mary Ann Evans (1819–1880), was a leading novelist of the Victorian era whose works helped redefine the possibilities of English realism. Writing across fiction, essays, and poetry, she combined psychological depth with a searching moral vision, portraying provincial life, intellectual ambition, and social change with uncommon nuance. Her novels—among them Adam Bede, The Mill on the Floss, Silas Marner, Middlemarch, and Daniel Deronda—are widely recognized for their insight into motive and consequence, their humane skepticism, and their unsentimental compassion. Eliot’s influence has endured in literary culture, shaping expectations for the novel as a vehicle for ethical inquiry and sympathetic understanding.
Eliot received formal schooling in Warwickshire and pursued extensive self-education, developing strong competencies in languages and philosophy. In the 1840s and 1850s she translated foundational works of German thought, notably David Strauss’s The Life of Jesus and Ludwig Feuerbach’s The Essence of Christianity, which exposed her to higher criticism and reshaped her understanding of religion. She studied Spinoza and engaged with debates associated with positivism, while maintaining a disciplined, evidence-based skepticism. These inquiries informed her secular ethical framework: the conviction that human flourishing depends on sympathy, self-knowledge, and responsibility rather than dogma. Her careful reading across theology, history, and science became integral to the intellectual texture of her fiction and essays.
Moving to London, Eliot entered the world of letters as a critic and editor, working in the early 1850s at the Westminster Review, a center of progressive intellectual debate. There she wrote influential criticism, including the essay Silly Novels by Lady Novelists, which challenged prevailing literary conventions and expectations. Her editorial experience sharpened her analytical voice and broadened her literary connections. Adopting the pen name George Eliot to secure serious reception and privacy, she published Scenes of Clerical Life in 1857–1858. These stories, grounded in careful observation of provincial communities, introduced her distinctive realism. They were well received and signaled the arrival of a major new voice in English fiction.
Eliot’s first full-length novel, Adam Bede (1859), met with immediate success for its vivid rural setting and moral gravity. The Mill on the Floss (1860) expanded her reach with a complex portrait of ambition, disappointment, and social constraint. Silas Marner (1861) distilled themes of isolation, trust, and renewal into a tightly structured narrative. Across these works, critics noted her commitment to psychological credibility, ethical nuance, and a richly contextual sense of community. Her prose combines narrative authority with reflective commentary, inviting readers to weigh choices and consequences. The early novels cemented her reputation as an author who married narrative momentum to searching moral analysis.
Ambition and experimentation marked the next phase of Eliot’s career. Romola (1862–1863), set in Renaissance Florence, showcased her historical imagination and rigorous research, examining conscience and public duty in a dramatically different milieu from her English settings. Felix Holt, the Radical (1866) engaged with political reform and civic education in the wake of expanding electoral debates. She also composed poetry, notably The Spanish Gypsy (1868), a dramatic work exploring destiny, identity, and cultural inheritance. While responses to these projects varied, contemporaries recognized the intellectual reach and seriousness of purpose that sustained her exploration of history, politics, and moral psychology.
Middlemarch (1871–1872) stands as Eliot’s panoramic study of provincial life, interweaving multiple plots to examine vocation, marriage, reform, and the ethics of sympathy. Often praised for its structural sophistication and reflective narrator, it has been repeatedly cited as a masterpiece of the English novel. Daniel Deronda (1876) extended her cosmopolitan interests, offering a sustained engagement with Jewish life and aspirations alongside searching portraits of personal choice and responsibility. Her late volume, Impressions of Theophrastus Such (1879), presented essayistic character studies that distilled long-held concerns with intellect, temperament, and moral habit. Throughout, Eliot’s secular humanism animated her portrayal of how individuals are shaped—and tested—by social bonds.
Eliot remained a central figure in British letters through the 1870s, admired for intellectual rigor and artistic integrity. She died in London in 1880. Although her reputation experienced shifts, the 20th century saw renewed acclaim, with influential critics and novelists highlighting the maturity and breadth of Middlemarch in particular. Her legacy endures in the development of psychological realism, the subtle interplay of narrator and character, and the novel’s capacity for ethical reflection without reliance on doctrinal certainties. Eliot’s insistence on complexity, sympathy, and responsible action continues to inform contemporary literary practice and debates about the moral imagination.
Middlemarch (Summarized Edition)
Prelude
Who ponders humanity lingers over Saint Theresa: the little girl who, hand-in-hand with her brother, marched from Avila to seek martyrdom among the Moors until watchful uncles turned the fawns homeward. The attempt foretold a soul that burned flimsy romance to ash and rose, fed from within, toward endless service, at last finding its epic in reforming a religious order. Later Theresas, born to equal fervor, meet paltry chances; striving amid dim lights, they oscillate between vision and common longing, are branded extravagant or fallen, and, in a world deriding feminine vagueness, flutter like cygnets among pond-bound ducklings, their heartbeats dissolving among hindrances.
Book I. Miss Brooke.
Chapter 1
“Since I can do no good because a woman, Reach constantly at something that is near it.” Miss Dorothea Brooke possesses a beauty sharpened by austere dress: bare sleeves reveal sculptured wrist, plain garments give her the gravity of a Bible verse dropped into a newspaper. People call her clever yet say sister Celia has more sense; still, both eschew frippery, proud of “good” ancestry—admirals, clergy, even a Cromwellian Puritan—and trained to regard ribbons as hucksterish. Religion alone fixes Dorothea’s simplicity; she recites Pascal, despises gimp, seeks lofty purpose. Orphaned, the sisters were schooled abroad and now live at Tipton Grange with Uncle Brooke.
Dorothea’s zeal unsettles provincial matchmakers: she kneels by sick laborers to pray, fasts like a Papist, pores over old theology at midnight, and might wake a husband with schemes that threaten saddle-horses and political economy. Men think twice, while society trusts that opinions remain unacted. Villagers prefer amiable Celia; yet those who ride beside Dorothea, cheeks glowing, find her bright. She credits visitors’ attentions to Celia, especially Sir James Chettam, whose “Exactly” bores her. The marriage she imagines joins disciple to teacher, a guide who could even coach her Hebrew. Uncle Brooke avoids hiring a superior chaperone, so she rules the Grange contentedly.
Sir James will dine with Reverend Edward Casaubon, scholar absorbed for years in a grand religious history; his name sounds august. Earlier, Dorothea returns from her village school, sits in the sisters’ room, and sketches model buildings. Celia hovers, then asks, “Dorothea, dear, if you don’t mind—shall we look at mamma’s jewels today and divide them? It is exactly six months since uncle gave them to you, and you have not opened the box.” Dorothea laughs: “What a wonderful little almanac you are, Celia! Calendar or lunar months?” Celia states the dates. Smiling, Dorothea keeps drawing: “Well, dear, we should never wear them, you know.
Celia blushes. “I think, dear, ignoring the jewels disrespects mamma,” she says, voice quavering. “Necklaces are common now, and even strict Madame Poinçon wore them—surely sainted women once wore jewels.” Dorothea starts. “You want to wear them? Then bring them out—the keys!” Celia, prepared, opens the cabinet; opal lights spill across the table. Dorothea clasps amethyst links round Celia’s throat. “There, wear this with your Indian muslin; the pearl cross with dark gowns.” Celia, glowing, protests, “O Dodo, keep the cross.” “Not for the world,” Dorothea shudders. “A cross is no trinket.” “Will you think me wicked?” “Souls have complexions too.
Celia feels the austere tolerance as a slight and asks, “How can I wear ornaments if you refuse them?” “Nay,” answers Dorothea, “I’d feel I’d been pirouetting; the world would spin.” Relieved, Celia pockets the necklace and opens more boxes; an emerald ring and matching bracelet blaze as the sun breaks out. “How beautiful!” Dorothea breathes. “Colors pierce us like scent; no wonder Revelation paints heaven with gems. That emerald outshines the rest.” “Then keep it,” says Celia. Dorothea slides on ring and bracelet, reflects, “What wretched men dig and sell such things… Yet I will keep these. Carry off the others and the casket.
“Will you wear them in company?” Celia ventures. A spark flickers in Dorothea’s eyes. “Perhaps. I cannot tell to what level I may sink.” Celia blushes, repacks the jewels, and leaves, still sure she is blameless while her sister inconsistent: either share all or renounce all. Over her tapestry she murmurs, “A necklace will not spoil my prayers, and I’m not bound by Dorothea’s whims.” Soon a call comes: “Kitty, look at my plan; I may have impossible stairs and fireplaces!” Celia bends over the drawing; Dorothea lays her cheek against her arm, silent apology accepted, the familiar blend of awe and private opinion renewed.
