14,40 €
The Investigation is a dramatic reconstruction of the Frankfurt War Crimes trials, based on the actual evidence given. This testimony, concerning Auschwitz and the atrocities which were enacted there, has been edited and extracted by Peter Weiss into a dramatic document that relies solely and completely on the facts for its effectiveness. There is no artistic license, no manipulation of facts and figures, no rearrangement of events for theatrical effect. Nameless witnesses stand and recall their appalling memories of Auschwitz, allowing us to bear witness to their painful and painstaking search for truth and ultimately justice. What emerges is a chastening and purging documentary of deeply moving power.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020
THE INVESTIGATION
By the same author
The Marat/Sade (a play)
Leavetaking and Vanishing Point (two novels)
The Conversation of the Three Walkers and The Shadow of the Coachman’s Body (two novels)
Discourse on Vietnam (a play)
Notes on the Cultural Life of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (essays)
First published in the United Kingdom in 1966 by Calder & Boyars Ltd.
Re-issued in Great Britain and the United States in 2012 by Marion Boyars Publishers.
Reprinted in 1982, 1996, 2005, 2012, 2015, 2020 by Marion Boyars Publishers Ltd.
Marion Boyars Publishers
26 Parke Road
London SW13 9NG
www.marionboyars.co.uk
This ebook edition first published in 2020
All rights reserved :
© Translation copyright Marion Boyars Publishers for the translation by by Alexander Gross 1966, 1982, 1996, 2005, 2012, 2015, 2020
© Surhkamp Verlag. All rights reserved by and controlled through Suhrkamp Verlag Berlin, Germany.
The moral rights of the authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
This ebook is copyright material and must not be copied, reproduced, transferred, distributed, leased, licensed or publicly performed or used in any way except as specifically permitted in writing by the publishers, as allowed under the terms and conditions under which it was purchased or as strictly permitted by applicable copyright law. Any unauthorised distribution or use of this text may be a direct infringement of the author’s and publisher’s rights, and those responsible may be liable in law accordingly
10 digit ISBN: 0-7145-2011-X
13 digit ISBN: 978-0-7145-2011-7
CANTO ONE:
The Loading Ramp
CANTO TWO:
The Camp
CANTO THREE:
The Swing
CANTO FOUR:
The Possibility of Survival
CANTO FIVE:
The End of Lili Tofler
CANTO SIX:
Unterscharführer Stark
CANTO SEVEN:
The Black Wall
CANTO EIGHT:
Phenol
CANTO NINE:
The Bunkerblock
CANTO TEN:
Cyclone B
CANTO ELEVEN:
The Fire-Ovens
The Investigation was first presented as a play simultaneously in thirteen theatres in both East and West Germany on October 19th 1965 and had a public midnight reading by the Royal Shakespeare Company under the direction of Peter Brook that same night at the Aldwych Theatre, London.
JUDGE
COUNSEL FOR THE PROSECUTION
representing the Public Prosecutor
and the Co-Plaintiff*
COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENCE
DEFENDANTS 1 - 18
representing actual people
WITNESSES 1 - 9
representing successively quite
diverse and anonymous witnesses
* One of the most interesting aspects of the Auchwitz trials in Frankfurt was the presence of a legal emissary from East Germany, whom the author here refers to as the co-plaintiff.
Translator.
In presenting this play no attempt should be made to reconstruct the courtroom before which the deliberations over the camp actually took place. Such a representation seems just as impossible to the author as a representation of the camp on stage would be.
Hundreds of witnesses appeared before the Court of Justice. The confrontation of witnesses and defendants, like the speeches for and against, was loaded to the breaking point with emotional power.
From all this only the central core of the evidence can remain on stage.
This can contain nothing but the facts as they came to be expressed in words during the course of the trial. The personal experiences and confrontations must be softened into anonymity. Which means that the witnesses in the play lose their names and become little more than megaphones. The nine witnesses report only what hundreds expressed. The different experiences can be at most indicated by alterations in voice and posture.
Witnesses 1 and 2 are witnesses who sided with the camp authorities.
Witnesses 4 and 5 are female witnesses, the others being male, from among the ranks of the surviving prisoners.
Each of the 18 Defendants represents a definite person. They bear names that are taken over from the actual trial. That they have their own names is significant, for they also bore their names during the time that is the subject of this hearing, while the prisoners had lost their names.
But in the play it is not the bearers of the names who should once again be accused. They lend the author only their names, which here stand as symbols for a system which conferred guilt on those many others who never appeared before this court. For the purpose of stage production an interval can be inserted after the Sixth Canto.
JUDGE:
Herr Witness
You were the head of the railway station
where the shipments arrived
How far was the station from the camp
WITNESS 1:
A mile from the old barracks
and about 3 miles from the main camp
JUDGE:
Did you work in the camps
WITNESS 1:
No
I was only supposed to make sure
the train lines were in order
and that trains came in and out
according to time-table
JUDGE:
What condition were the lines in
WITNESS 1:
They were in extremely good condition
very well laid-out tracks
JUDGE:
Did you have anything to do
with arranging the time-tables
WITNESS 1:
No
I was only supposed to take care
of the technical details
connected with the shuttle service
between the station and the camp
JUDGE:
The court is in possession
of time-table forms signed by you
WITNESS 1:
Maybe once it happened I had
to sign them on someone else’s behalf
JUDGE:
Were you aware of the purpose
of these shipments
WITNESS 1:
That was outside of my field
JUDGE:
You knew the trains were loaded with people
WITNESS 1:
We were told only
that it had to do with resettling
people who were under the protection
of the State
JUDGE:
And the empty trains
coming back so regularly
you didn’t think about that
WITNESS 1:
They sent the people off to resettle there
PROSECUTOR:
Herr Witness
you have today a leading position
in the direction of the government railways
We can assume therefore
that you are familiar with questions
of fitting out and loading trains
How were the trains arriving at your station
fitted out and loaded
WITNESS 1:
These were freight trains
That means the bills of lading
were for about 60 people per car in transit
PROSECUTOR:
Were these freight cars
or cattle cars
WITNESS 1:
There were also cars
used for shipping cattle
PROSECUTOR:
Were there sanitary arrangements
in these cars
WITNESS 1:
I couldn’t tell you
PROSECUTOR:
How often did these trains arrive
WITNESS 1:
I really can’t say
PROSECUTOR:
Did they come frequently
WITNESS 1:
Yes of course
It was an important terminus
PROSECUTOR:
Didn’t you notice
that the shipments came
from almost every country in Europe
WITNESS 1:
We were so busy
we couldn’t bother
with that sort of thing
PROSECUTOR:
Didn’t you ask yourself
what was going to happen
to all those evacuees
WITNESS 1:
They were supposed to be sent
on work assignments
PROSECUTOR:
But there weren’t just workers
there were whole families
with old people and children
WITNESS 1:
I didn’t have any time
to check what was in the train
PROSECUTOR:
Where were you living
WITNESS 1:
In the village
PROSECUTOR:
Who else was living there
WITNESS 1:
The village was cleared
of its original inhabitants
Officers of the camp lived there
and personnel from the factories
PROSECUTOR:
What kind of factories
WITNESS 1:
There were branches
of IG Farben Company
and Krupp and Siemens
PROSECUTOR:
Did you see any prisoners
working there
WITNESS 1:
I saw them coming and going to work
PROSECUTOR:
What was their condition
WITNESS 1:
They marched in step and they sang
PROSECUTOR:
You learned nothing
about conditions in the camp
WITNESS 1:
You heard a lot of nonsense
but you never knew what to make of it
PROSECUTOR:
You heard nothing
about people being exterminated
WITNESS 1:
How could anyone believe something like that
JUDGE:
Herr Witness
You were responsible
for the goods trains
WITNESS: 2
I was only supposed
to hand over the trains
to the people in the shunting yard
JUDGE:
And what were their duties
WITNESS: 2
They put on the switching engine
and took the train to the camp
JUDGE:
According to your estimate
how many people
were in a goods wagon
WITNESS: 2
I can’t tell you that
It was strictly forbidden
to examine the trains
JUDGE:
Who stopped you
WITNESS: 2
The guards
JUDGE:
Was there a bill of lading
for each shipment
WITNESS: 2
There were rarely any documents
Only chalk figures written
on the cars
JUDGE:
What sort of figures
WITNESS: 2
60 or 80 sometimes
depending
JUDGE:
When did the trains arrive
WITNESS: 2
Usually at night
PROSECUTOR:
What impression did you have of these carloads
WITNESS: 2
I don’t understand the question
PROSECUTOR:
Herr Witness
you are an Inspector for the railway
and know something about travel conditions
Did nothing you saw through the hatches
or heard from the goods wagons
tell you that something was amiss
WITNESS: 2
Once I saw a woman
who held a little child near the air hatch
and cried out incessantly for water
I went for a can of water
and wanted to give it to her
As I held it up to her
a guard came along
and said
If I didn’t go away at once
I would be shot
JUDGE:
Herr Witness
How many trains do you estimate
came to the station
WITNESS: 2
On an average I’d say one a day
When things got rushed
there might be two or three
JUDGE:
How long were the trains
WITNESS: 2
They could be 60 cars
JUDGE:
Herr Witness
were you ever in the camp
WITNESS: 2
I went along once with the switching engine
because there was something to discuss
about a bill of lading
Right behind the entrance tower
I left the train and went into the office
I almost didn’t make it out again
because I had no permit
JUDGE:
What did you see of the camp
WITNESS: 2
Nothing
I was happy to get out again
JUDGE:
Did you see the chimneys
at the end of the ramp
and smoke and the glare of fire
WITNESS: 2
Yes
I saw smoke
JUDGE:
What did you make of it
WITNESS: 2
I thought
those were the bakeries
They told me
bread was baked by night and day
It was a very big camp