1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In A. E. W. Mason's 1912 novel, *The Philanderers*, the author skillfully navigates the intricacies of human relationships and the moral ambiguities surrounding love and fidelity. Set against the backdrop of British society, Mason's narrative weaves a tapestry of deceit, desire, and social expectation, characterized by his elegant prose and sharp wit. The novel delves into the psyche of its characters, revealing their vulnerabilities and complexities, while engaging the reader in a compelling exploration of the consequences of philandering amidst societal norms of the early 20th century. Mason, a British author and playwright, possessed a keen insight into the human condition, likely drawn from his experiences as a war correspondent and his travels. His keen observations of varying cultures and social structures influenced his reflections on love and betrayal, as evidenced in *The Philanderers*. Mason's deep understanding of both the male and female perspectives allows him to portray a nuanced view of relationships that speaks to the timeless nature of infidelity and romance. *The Philanderers* is an essential read for anyone intrigued by the complexities of love, as well as those who appreciate eloquent prose and sophisticated character development. The novel not only entertains but challenges readers to ponder the very fabric of their own relationships, making it a timeless addition to the canon of literature exploring human intimacy. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
The Philanderers
Table of Contents
Introduction
Desire becomes a proving ground for integrity when the games of romance meet the demands of honor. In The Philanderers, A. E. W. Mason turns a keen, humane eye on the pleasures and perils of pursuit, tracing how charm, habit, and social ease can blur into evasion of responsibility. Without preaching, the novel observes how private impulses cast long public shadows, and how affection takes on the gravity of obligation the moment it is truly felt. What begins in lightness gathers weight as choices multiply, and the seemingly trivial flourishes of courtship reveal their power to shape character, reputation, and consequence.
First published in the late 1890s, The Philanderers belongs to the late-Victorian tradition of the social novel, attentive to manners, speech, and the codes that govern respectable life. Mason, a British novelist and playwright, writes with clarity about the pressures and protocols of his age. The story moves within the orbit of cultivated society, a milieu where leisure, conversation, and appearances carry real power. The historical moment matters: the novel reflects a culture negotiating ideas about marriage, masculinity, and personal freedom, even as it prizes decorum and restraint. Its backdrop allows private entanglements to become a mirror for public expectations and moral thought.
Without divulging its turns, the premise is straightforward: the narrative follows the entanglements that arise when people accustomed to flirtation confront a bond that demands steadiness. Mason orchestrates meetings, confidences, and misunderstandings that keep the tale poised between social comedy and moral inquiry. Rather than relying on extravagance, the plot draws tension from converging expectations, from promises spoken too lightly, and from the fear of failing them. Readers are guided through a sequence of encounters that reveal character under pressure, as the initial ease of dalliance gives way to decisions that cannot be postponed without a cost.
The book’s voice is polished and observant, its mood alert to irony without abandoning empathy. Mason’s prose favors balance: the scenes are shaped with economy, the dialogue carries implication as well as surface charm, and the narrative never loses sight of what is at stake. The pacing is measured but purposeful, building momentum through accumulation rather than spectacle. Subtle shifts in tone register as the story moves from brightness toward the sober light of reckoning. The result is a reading experience that rewards attentiveness, inviting the reader to notice how small hesitations, evasions, and admissions alter the course of a life.
Themes central to the novel include the ethics of promise and the burden of reputation; the divide between self-image and conduct; and the roles men and women are expected to perform in a society that prizes control. Mason shows how an easy manner can mask indecision, how wit can shade into self-protection, and how love clarifies character by calling for constancy. The book asks whether freedom is merely the absence of commitment or the capacity to choose rightly when choice entails loss. It also examines the complicity that groups can foster, and the solitude that follows when conscience finally speaks.
These concerns give The Philanderers a contemporary resonance. Readers today will recognize the pull between options and obligations, the pressure to remain unencumbered, and the appeal of self-fashioning in public while doubts persist in private. The novel invites reflection on accountability in intimacy, on the uses and abuses of charm, and on the courage required to turn inclination into responsibility. Its portrait of social performance feels timely, yet it resists cynicism, suggesting that sincerity is neither easy nor naïve. By framing perennial questions within the customs of its period, the book opens space to consider how values are tested across eras.
As an early novel by A. E. W. Mason, The Philanderers shows the qualities that help explain his enduring appeal: lucid storytelling, moral focus, and a firm sense of consequence. It offers a refined study of attraction, choice, and character, not by announcing a thesis but by letting action, dialogue, and restraint illuminate what matters. Readers will find a narrative that begins in sociable ease and moves, with quiet authority, toward ethical clarity. For those drawn to fiction of manners that also carries a moral charge, this novel extends an elegant invitation to watch charm meet its measure—and to weigh the results.
Synopsis
In late-Victorian London, The Philanderers is a small, comfortable club where a circle of accomplished men cultivate an air of romantic detachment. They banter about attachments, set playful rules for conduct, and treat courtship as a sport to be sampled rather than pursued to an ending. The club’s dinners, smoking-room debates, and well-bred intrigues provide a polished backdrop. Beneath the wit, however, lie habits of loyalty and an exacting regard for reputation. The opening chapters establish this milieu, showing how the club’s creed of lightness, adopted almost in jest, shapes its members’ choices and the expectations of the society in which they move.
A returning officer and traveler, hardened by service in Africa, enters this environment with an outsider’s gravity. London’s rhythm is familiar but curiously thinned by memory; the club welcomes him, yet his perspective has shifted. At a gathering he meets a young woman whose poise and independence distinguish her from the casual conquests the Philanderers often celebrate. Their initial exchanges are courteous, edged with curiosity, and set against soirées, theater visits, and quiet conversations where observing counts more than declarations. The narrative keeps the tone urbane while letting the officer’s inward seriousness contrast with the club’s light practice, signaling the deeper conflict to come.
A second figure emerges—a polished suitor, deft in salons and admired for his charm—whose attentions focus swiftly on the same woman. The officer recognizes him from an earlier expedition, where circumstances raised troubling questions about judgment and courage. Discretion binds the officer; official silence and private honor prevent him from speaking easily. The suitor’s reputation in London is unblemished and useful friendships shield him. The chapters trace the early movements of this triangle: invitations accepted, visits exchanged, glances interpreted, each scene suggesting that what mattered in distant provinces may matter here, though it must be shown without theatrical exposure or scandal.
Within the club, half-serious plots and teasing advice proliferate. Some members, amused by the rivalries, arrange harmless diversions or attempt to tip the scales with tactful hints. The officer resists partisanship and refuses to trade in rumor, holding that character reveals itself through conduct. Minor episodes accumulate: small tests of punctuality, responsibility, and candor in which the suitor appears smooth yet elusive. The woman listens more than she speaks, revealing a quiet attention to consistency over charm. A measured rapport grows between her and the officer, not as an avowal but as a sympathy shaped by shared reserve and a preference for plain dealing.
Midway, the story looks backward to outline the episode abroad that troubles the officer. In a remote district, a hasty retreat or mismanaged negotiation had consequences that were never fully examined. A report was filed with omissions; witnesses were scattered by postings and illness; one essential testimony proved inaccessible. The suitor’s part in those events remains ambiguous to outsiders but distinct to those who were there. The officer possesses letters and recollections that would clarify matters, yet he lacks authority to publish them, and doing so could injure reputations beyond the one at issue. He resolves to verify facts before he speaks.
This resolution leads to a discreet inquiry that moves between colonial offices, dockside addresses, and drawing-room conversations. The officer seeks a diary, a despatch, or a living witness who can corroborate details without violating confidences. He meets reticence from officials protective of processes and indifference from acquaintances unwilling to complicate a pleasant season. Meanwhile, society advances: invitations, rumors of an understanding, signs that the suitor’s courtship gains ground. The officer measures urgency against restraint, intent on protecting both the woman’s freedom to choose and the integrity of those whose names would surface should he expose more than he can substantiate.
An unscripted trial in London supplies the pivot the officer would not manufacture. A sudden emergency—unfolding in the open, among people who matter—requires promptness, steadiness, and an acceptance of risk. Without rhetoric, behavior under pressure distinguishes the two men more clearly than any whispered accusation could. The woman observes enough to form an independent judgment, and the club’s members, still playful, grow sober as they reckon with what they have seen. No public denunciation follows; the novel avoids spectacle. Instead, a shift in confidence occurs, grounded in action rather than assertion, allowing consequences to emerge without the machinery of scandal.
In the aftermath, private conversations reshape connections. The officer, long careful to separate feeling from pride, acknowledges the depth of his concern, even at the cost of violating the club’s easy creed. The woman’s choice, framed by observed character rather than promises, clarifies quietly. The suitor, confronted by altered perceptions, adapts to a reduced standing without melodrama. Among the Philanderers, a joking vow of perpetual lightness begins to sound inadequate; their camaraderie remains, yet its terms are chastened by events. The book maintains a decorous reserve, marking shifts in allegiance and intention without exhaustive explanation or an explicit, triumphal pronouncement.
The closing chapters gather these threads to emphasize steadiness, discretion, and earned trust over wit and pose. The narrative links the colonial past with metropolitan present to suggest that duty, once learned, accompanies a man home and governs conduct where no orders are given. The Philanderers’ philosophy of dalliance is not condemned so much as outgrown by those tested. Without specifying final arrangements, the story communicates its essence: that affection anchored in responsibility survives social weather, and that truth, handled with care, can prevail without spectacle. The novel thus completes a balanced arc from playful premise to considered resolution.
Historical Context
Set chiefly in late-Victorian London in the mid-to-late 1890s, The Philanderers moves through drawing rooms, gentlemen’s clubs, and the West End’s social circuits, while glancing outward to the British Empire’s East African frontier. The urban setting is one of regulated etiquette, reputational anxieties, and professional ambition, with Pall Mall and St James’s as emblematic spaces of masculine sociability. Beyond London, the novel gestures to imperial theatres whose campaigns and postings shape careers and character. The temporal frame coincides with the Conservative–Unionist ascendancy under Lord Salisbury, the consolidation of British rule in Uganda (proclaimed a Protectorate in 1894), and the fevered public discourse of “Greater Britain.”
The Scramble for Africa (1884–1914) forms a structural backdrop. Following the Berlin Conference (1884–85) and chartered-company rule, the Imperial British East Africa Company (IBEAC, 1888–1895) pushed inland from Mombasa, while Frederick Lugard’s 1890–92 mission in Buganda laid the groundwork for formal control. After Sir Gerald Portal’s 1893 report, the British government declared the Uganda Protectorate in 1894. This transition from commercial to Crown rule introduced garrisons, treaties, and administrative cadres. In Mason’s novel, the aura of a young officer’s service and the London club that appraises such exploits mirror how imperial appointments conferred status at home and supplied a code of honor that governs the plot’s entanglements.
The most shaping complex of events is Uganda’s turbulent 1890s: religious wars, royal upheaval, and imperial consolidation. In January–February 1892, conflict between Protestant and Catholic factions around Mengo (Kampala) culminated in fighting in which Lugard’s small force, notably with a Maxim gun, secured Protestant ascendancy and the IBEAC foothold. After Portal’s mission (1893) and the 1894 Protectorate declaration, the region remained unsettled. Kabaka Mwanga II, alternately resisting and negotiating British influence, was deposed in 1897 amid renewed disturbances and was ultimately captured and exiled to the Seychelles in 1899; his infant son, Daudi Chwa II, became kabaka under regency. The Sudanese (Nubian) troops employed in the Protectorate also mutinied in 1897–98, compelling a series of expeditions to suppress revolt and reassert control along the Nile headwaters. The administrative settlement arrived with Sir Harry Johnston’s tenure as Special Commissioner, culminating in the Uganda Agreement of 10 March 1900, signed by Johnston and leading Buganda chiefs, including Apolo Kagwa. It codified governance, recognized Chwa II’s position, and instituted land allocations (mailo tenure) that restructured power across approximately 9,000 square miles. Historically, these campaigns imprinted Britain’s military-technical superiority, missionary alignments, and pragmatic alliance-building. In the novel’s world, such episodes inform the tested, laconic demeanor expected of imperial officers returning to London and provide the moral vocabulary—duty, promise-keeping, obedience to a code—that drives the characters’ conflicts. The uncertainty and rapid shifts of authority in Kampala-Mengo give resonance to personal pledges and betrayals at home, while the very fact of protectorate-making explains how colonial service becomes both career and crucible for Mason’s protagonists.
The Uganda Railway, built from 1896 to 1901 between Mombasa and the Lake Victoria port later called Kisumu (then Port Florence), transformed East African logistics. Spanning roughly 660 miles (about 1,060 km) and costing over £5 million, it employed tens of thousands of Indian laborers; the 1898 Tsavo man-eaters episode, recorded by J. H. Patterson, dramatized its perils. The line enabled rapid troop movement, administrative reach, and imperial trade. Although not a technical subject of the novel, its completion frames the plausibility of officers’ movements and the London milieu’s new familiarity with East Africa, whose placenames and campaigns circulate in club conversation and reputational currency.
The Anglo-Egyptian reconquest of the Sudan (1896–1899), climaxing at Omdurman on 2 September 1898 under Horatio Kitchener, provided the late-1890s with spectacular imperial vindication. With Maxim guns and disciplined infantry, Anglo-Egyptian forces defeated the Mahdist army; casualties numbered about 11,000 Mahdists killed to under 50 British dead. The concurrent Fashoda Incident (1898) brought Britain and France to the brink before a diplomatic settlement. In London, such victories reinforced martial ideals and fueled press-driven jingoism. Mason’s characters inhabit this celebratory climate; the novel reflects how public glory and imperial headlines stiffen private codes of conduct and expectations of masculine nerve.
Debates over gender and marriage in the 1890s—often labeled the emergence of the “New Woman”—shaped social relations. The Married Women’s Property Acts (1870, 1882) and the 1891 case R v Jackson (limiting a husband’s power to confine his wife) reconfigured domestic authority. In 1897, the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) formed under Millicent Garrett Fawcett, signaling organized, constitutional agitation. In elite circles, chaperonage norms, the press, and the divorce courts made engagements reputational battlegrounds. The Philanderers mirrors these currents through an assertive heroine and a male coterie whose rules about courtship expose the period’s double standards, testing whether honor serves women as well as it serves men.
Late-Victorian clubland and the professionalizing gentleman furnished a distinctive political culture. St James’s and Pall Mall clubs mediated careers, patronage, and reputation, while Cardwell (1871) and Childers (1881) army reforms reshaped the officer class by abolishing purchase and institutionalizing short-service and regimental identities. Conservative–Unionist governments (1895–1902, Lord Salisbury) sustained a confident imperial rhetoric, and the popular press celebrated risk-taking abroad as social capital at home. In Mason’s fiction, the eponymous club distills this ecosystem: bylaws, ballots, and backstairs influence dramatize how informal institutions policed conduct, converting colonial service and romantic entanglements into public tests of character.
As a social and political critique, the book interrogates the late-Victorian cult of honor by showing how club rules and imperial bravado can rationalize selfishness and manipulate women’s choices. It exposes the unequal stakes of reputation—where a man’s lapse is recoded as gallantry, while a woman bears lasting censure—and questions the morality of codes forged in colonial command when applied to intimate life. By juxtaposing London’s ceremonious propriety with East Africa’s coercive state-making, it highlights the dissonance between public virtue and private expediency, indicting a system that sanctifies class camaraderie and empire while leaving justice, reciprocity, and individual freedom precariously secured.
