1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Village That Voted the Earth Was Flat," Rudyard Kipling presents a satirical exploration of the deep-seated convictions that underlie collective belief systems. Set in a fictional, insular village, the narrative employs Kipling's signature blend of humor and pointed social commentary, reflecting Victorian-era sensibilities. The stylistic choices, characterized by sharp dialogue and vivid imagery, effectively underscore themes of ignorance, conformity, and the absurdity of dogma. The story serves as an allegory for the broader disjunction between reason and folly, a hallmark of Kipling's oeuvre amidst the precipitating modern debates on science and tradition. Rudyard Kipling, a Nobel Prize-winning author renowned for his vivid storytelling and deep insights into human nature, was shaped by his diverse upbringing in colonial India and his later experiences in England. These cultural dichotomies provided Kipling with a rich tapestry of material to explore the intersections of belief and reality, prompting him to examine how communities form their collective identities in often irrational ways. His own navigations between cultures reflect the nuanced sensibilities displayed throughout this tale. This engaging narrative is a must-read for anyone interested in the dynamics of belief and societal consensus. Kipling's adept use of satire will not only provoke thought but also entertain, making it an essential addition to the library of those who appreciate the complexities of human perception and the folly that can arise within tightly-knit societies. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020
Ähnliche
The Village That Voted the Earth Was Flat
Table of Contents
Introduction
A petty injustice swells into a carnival of conviction, proving how swiftly certainty can eclipse truth. Rudyard Kipling’s The Village That Voted the Earth Was Flat opens as a light excursion and turns, with mischievous precision, into a case study in collective behavior. Its central energy springs from the collision between urbane confidence and rural authority, where a trifling clash becomes public spectacle. Kipling engineers this escalation with the elegance of clockwork, revealing how pride, procedure, and performance can trap sensible people in absurdity. The result is a brisk, unsettling comedy that keeps the reader laughing while quietly tightening the vise.
This tale is considered a classic because it distills enduring anxieties about modern life into a deceptively playful narrative. Kipling harnesses satire to probe institutions—law, press, and politics—without didactic heaviness, letting the mechanics of farce illuminate the fragility of consensus. Its influence persists in the way later writers treat bureaucratic folly and media storms, yet the story remains distinctively Kipling: exacting in detail, swift in movement, and razor-sharp in judgment. It sits at an intersection of English comic tradition and social critique, proving that a compact story can engage with the largest questions about authority, knowledge, and public belief.
Written by Rudyard Kipling, recipient of the 1907 Nobel Prize in Literature, the story belongs to his mature, early twentieth-century period. It was later collected in his 1917 volume A Diversity of Creatures, a book that displays his range beyond imperial settings and adventure. The Village That Voted the Earth Was Flat is not a treatise on science; it is a social comedy about reputation, spectacle, and the machinery of scandal. Kipling’s intention is not to reveal obscure truths but to dramatize familiar ones: how systems operate under stress, how pride skews judgment, and how entertainment can overtake reason.
At its outset, the story presents a chance confrontation that might have ended as an anecdote and grows, through calculation and vanity, into a civic drama. An incident on the road becomes the pretext for a scheme that plays expertly upon the rivalries of press and parish. The setting is recognizably English, the voices of authority familiar, and the chain of events eerily plausible. Kipling does not overload the plot with improbabilities; he shows instead how petty slights, once publicized, accumulate momentum. The floor of a local meeting becomes the theater for a nation’s laughter, and everyone’s role, however unintended, is amplified.
Kipling’s purpose is satiric but not frivolous. He asks how power behaves when it is questioned by ridicule, and how people protect their dignity when facts become inconvenient. The narrative turns upon the ease with which a story, shaped for entertainment, can overshadow the truth it purports to discuss. Without lecturing, he reveals the temptations of vengeance, the seductions of a good headline, and the hazards of turning people into props. The comedy is joyous on the surface, yet its argument is sober: institutions that live by ceremony and reputation are vulnerable to showmanship, and showmanship, once loosed, rarely stops at the first laugh.
Artistically, the story displays Kipling’s mastery of pacing and tonal modulation. He guides the reader from genial travelogue to surgical lampoon with transitions so smooth they feel inevitable. Scenes are arranged like acts in a play, each tightening irony and increasing stakes. The dialogue has the crispness of conversation among confident men accustomed to being believed, while the descriptive passages map the social terrain—public rooms, local offices, and the open road—where status is asserted and tested. Above all, Kipling’s understated narration allows the reader to discover the joke’s expanding circumference, until amusement shades into complicity and then, uneasily, into recognition.
The historical backdrop is essential. Early twentieth-century Britain was a world of expanding newspapers, new technologies, and evolving public administration. Motorcars were transforming distance and pace; the press was refining the arts of scandal and sensation; local governance still carried the rituals of an older order. Kipling uses these conditions not as mere period color but as engines of consequence. A minor encounter can quickly become a national anecdote; a village can be vaulted into notoriety. The story’s mechanics reveal the modern intertwining of speed, publicity, and performance, where a single well-aimed jest can reorder reputations across social strata.
As part of Kipling’s broader oeuvre, this piece demonstrates his observational acuity beyond the imperial adventures most associated with his name. It shares with his best work a fascination with systems—legal, administrative, technological—and with the practical intelligence that navigates them. The story’s afterlife lies not in direct imitation but in its succinct model of how satire can expose institutional brittleness. Writers of later British comedy and social critique echo its method: assemble a plausible premise, stage escalating consequences, and let propriety undermine itself. In this respect, the tale helps define a lineage of humor that is also a diagnostic instrument.
Readers come for the laughter and stay for the unease. Kipling supplies the pleasures of a well-laid plan and the delightful inevitability of its unfolding, yet he withholds easy comfort. The story refuses to separate villains from dupes with clean lines, instead presenting a community of people who respond, as many would, to embarrassment and opportunity. Its charm lies in lively scenes and crisp wit; its lasting power lies in the questions it poses about motive and method. What begins as a prank acquires the gravity of a parable about public life, asking how far one should go to prove a point.
That moral pressure is carefully balanced with narrative verve. The rural setting is not caricatured; it becomes a stage on which national habits are performed and exaggerated. Kipling’s craft ensures that every success in the comedy extracts a cost in credibility from those who orchestrate it. The result is a study in escalating returns and risks, where each new layer of performance tightens the knot binding actors and audience. The tale thus achieves a double register: it entertains as a caper and instructs as a mirror, inviting the reader to measure personal amusement against the consequences borne by others.
For contemporary audiences, the story resonates with discussions about misinformation, performative outrage, and the velocity of viral narratives. It anticipates, with uncanny accuracy, how spectacle can crowd out substance and how institutional pride can provoke self-defeating displays. Yet it also preserves a humane interest in individuals, reminding us that errors of judgment are not confined to any class or profession. In a culture hungry for certainty, Kipling’s caution is timely: confidence and coherence are not the same as truth. The village’s vote is funny; its implications, for public discourse and private conscience, are sobering and immediate.
The Village That Voted the Earth Was Flat endures because it fuses brisk entertainment with a precise anatomy of power, vanity, and belief. Its themes—truth and performance, authority and ridicule, community and contagion—remain visible wherever institutions meet public theater. As an introduction to Kipling’s range, it reveals his gift for turning small incidents into large questions and for placing humor in the service of moral inquiry. Readers will find a lively plot, memorable scenes, and a lingering challenge. The book continues to engage because it lets us laugh at folly while asking whether laughter alone can set anything right.
Synopsis
The Village That Voted the Earth Was Flat is a satirical tale set in Edwardian England. A small party of well-connected men, traveling by motorcar, passes through a rural village and falls afoul of local authority. Stopped for a minor motoring offense, they are hauled before the village bench and treated with officious severity. The incident is trivial in law but stinging in tone: fines are levied, dignity is bruised, and the visitors feel mocked by parochial power. Their annoyance, combined with their access to newspapers, politics, and entertainment, becomes the spark for an elaborate, public, and meticulously planned retaliation.
The men agree that formal appeals will not remedy the insult, which they see as symptomatic of petty tyranny cloaked in respectability. Rather than contesting the charge, they resolve to make an example of the village by turning it into an object of national ridicule. Their aim is not violence or illegality but the more devastating weapon of public opinion, leveraged through timely publicity. Each participant brings a skill: contacts in the press, experience with legislative atmospheres, and a keen sense for popular amusements. Together, they devise a plan to expose how easily perceptions can be shaped and reputations undone.
