0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Where No Fear Was: A Book About Fear," Arthur Christopher Benson delves deeply into the multifaceted nature of fear, exploring its psychological, emotional, and societal implications. Written in a reflective and accessible prose, the book combines elements of personal anecdote, philosophical inquiry, and psychological analysis, creating a rich tapestry that invites readers to confront their own fears. Benson contextualizes fear within the broader framework of human experience, drawing on historical and cultural references that illustrate its pervasive influence across time and place. His exploration raises critical questions about the roots of fear, its manifestations, and the possibility of transcending it. Arthur Christopher Benson, a British author and essayist, was not only a prominent figure in the literary world but also a deeply introspective thinker. As a member of the Benson family, known for their contributions to English literature, Christopher was influenced by the intellectual environment of his upbringing. His interests in psychology and spirituality, coupled with his personal experiences of anxiety, propelled him to write this insightful work, aiming to offer both understanding and solace to those grappling with fear. This book is highly recommended for readers who seek a deeper understanding of their own anxieties and the emotional landscapes of others. Benson's nuanced approach provides valuable insights that resonate with both the individual and the collective human experience, making it an essential read for anyone looking to confront and conquer their fears. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
Where No Fear Was: A Book About Fear
Table of Contents
Introduction
At its core, this book explores how fear arises in ordinary life and how thoughtful attention can turn alarm into steadiness. Arthur Christopher Benson writes not as a clinician or a dramatist, but as a reflective observer of the inner weather, inviting readers to notice the habits of mind that magnify unease. He approaches fear as a human constant, neither to be denied nor indulged, and he seeks a path that favors clear seeing over bravado. The result is a sustained meditation that treats courage as a practice, shaped by perception, temperament, and the daily disciplines of a considered life. It begins from the premise that understanding softens dread, and that naming our apprehensions is itself a form of relief.
Where No Fear Was: A Book About Fear is a nonfiction work by the English essayist Arthur Christopher Benson, published in the early twentieth century. Situated within the tradition of the familiar essay, it examines the psychology and ethics of fear through measured, personal reflections rather than through narrative drama. The book emerged from a British milieu alive with questions about character, education, and public life, yet it keeps its focus close to the individual conscience. Its setting is largely interior—the study, the walk, the correspondence of thought—making place and period a background to a larger inquiry into how minds meet uncertainty.
In place of plot, Benson offers a series of meditations that probe different facets of apprehension: the sudden rush of alarm, the lingering pressure of anxiety, the inhibitions that shadow choice. His voice is patient, confiding, and quietly exacting, preferring gentle analysis to exhortation. The prose is clear and balanced, attentive to nuance without becoming ornate, and the mood is composed rather than combative. Readers encounter a companionable guide who tests ideas against experience and invites the same experiment. The overall experience is contemplative and steadying, as if fear were being held up to a clear light until its outlines become workable.
Among the book’s central themes are distinction and proportion: separating prudent caution from paralyzing dread, weighing moral scruple against needless self-reproach, and locating the role of imagination in enlarging risks. Benson considers how temperament, habit, memory, and social expectation can feed worry, and how education, friendship, and artistic attention can temper it. He is interested in ordinary pressures—illness, work, reputation, change—and in how they translate into anxious thought. Rather than stage heroics, he emphasizes small acts of steadiness: reflective pause, truthful naming, and practical adjustment. Fear, in this account, is less an enemy to be defeated than a condition to be understood.
Such concerns remain timely. Readers today encounter a different technological environment but familiar patterns of uncertainty, and the book’s method—slow looking, ethical reflection, and humane self-scrutiny—offers a counterweight to quick fixes. Benson does not promise immunity; he proposes a way of thinking that makes fear less sovereign. The questions he raises—what we owe to ourselves under strain, how to live considerately with others, how to calibrate risk and responsibility—retain their bite. By tracing the contours of everyday apprehension, he provides not prescriptions but instruments: habits of attention that enlarge freedom, patience that resists panic, and a vocabulary for steady courage.
Approached as a historical work of insight, Where No Fear Was rewards unhurried reading. Its early twentieth-century idiom and examples reflect the author’s time, yet the book’s interest lies less in period than in method. Short chapters or sections can be read independently, but they also gather force when taken as a sustained conversation about character. Readers may find it useful to pause, to compare the analysis with their own occasions of unease, and to consider how small changes in routine and thought might help. The work asks for receptivity rather than agreement, and it offers companionship rather than command.
Within Benson’s wider body of reflective prose, this book stands as a focused inquiry into one of the most pervasive elements of human experience. It neither flatters fear nor dismisses it; instead, it searches for a durable poise grounded in attention, candor, and kindness. For contemporary readers, its value may lie in the calm with which it names difficulties and the tact with which it suggests response. Where No Fear Was thus feels less like a manual than a steady presence, a reminder that clarity is itself a form of courage, and that careful thought can make room where fear once stood.
Synopsis
Where No Fear Was is Arthur Christopher Benson’s reflective inquiry into the nature, causes, and curbing of fear, drawn from observation rather than technical psychology. He sets out to describe how fear appears in ordinary lives—from childhood rooms to professional corridors—and to suggest plain ways of diminishing its rule. The book advances gradually, beginning with early impressions, moving through school and work, and ending with spiritual and communal horizons. Benson treats fear not as a single enemy but as a cluster of habits: anxiety, anticipation, and the imagination’s alarms. Without polemic, he proposes that clarity, kindness, and steady occupation can make space where no fear was.
In the opening chapters, Benson examines childhood fear. He notes how vague, shadowy apprehensions gather around darkness, solitude, punishment, and the unknown language of grown-ups. The book describes the part played by authority—parents, nurses, teachers—in either planting needless dread or patiently easing it with explanation and gentleness. Benson attends to early moral panics, such as disproportionate shame over small faults, and shows how secrecy and silence let fear thrive. He prefers honest reassurance, simple rules, and cheerful companionship. The emphasis is not on heroic lessons but on removing avoidable alarms, and on teaching children to connect feelings with plain facts.
From there the discussion turns to school and the first social world of peers. Benson considers fears of disgrace, ridicule, and failure that arise under competition and rigid codes of behavior. He distinguishes outward physical courage from inner confidence, observing that institutions sometimes mistake hardness for bravery. The narrative surveys how examinations, discipline, and public opinion magnify worry, and how awkwardness with masters or elders can freeze initiative. Practical counsel favors routine, frank communication, and fair standards over intimidation. By moderating pressures and allowing room for mistakes, he argues, schools can reduce anxious strain without weakening effort or resolve.
Entering adult life, the book addresses fear in work and ambition. Benson describes common anxieties—the dread of not succeeding, of losing position, of being judged by fluctuating reputations. He advises setting deliberate limits to comparison, measuring progress by faithful work rather than by rivalry. The text notes the calming force of orderly habit, defined tasks, and steady hours, which diminish anticipatory worry. He also remarks on indecision as a fertile ground for fear, recommending timely choices and acceptance of outcomes. Responsibility is treated not as a stage for display but as a craft, practiced quietly until confidence accumulates.
Another sequence treats bodily fears and the temper of nerves. Benson remarks how attention magnifies symptoms, how idleness gives misgiving room, and how unguarded reading about diseases heightens alarm. He counsels reasonable care of health—fresh air, moderate exercise, regular rest—without medical morbidness. Pain and illness are acknowledged soberly; fear, he suggests, is softened by preparation and companionship rather than by denial. The book includes reflections on sleeplessness, fatigue, and the cyclical nature of spirits. It also faces fear of death, not dramatically, but as a fact set within ordinary duty, affection, and the sustaining habits of daily life.
Benson then considers fear in religion and conscience. He distinguishes reverence from terror, and objects to systems that school the spirit by threats. The book favors a trustful approach that regards God as the source of patience and compassion, not panic. He analyzes scruples—those anxious over-readings of duty—that burden generous minds, encouraging a steadier, simpler obedience. Prayer appears as a practice of quieting thought and redirecting attention, rather than as a demand for signs. While not arguing doctrine, Benson urges that love is a better tutor than fear, and that spiritual growth thrives in hope and sincerity.
Throughout, he returns to the imagination’s role in breeding alarms and in calming them. The same faculty that paints dangers can be trained to frame courage. Benson commends wholesome interests—literature, music, craft, and the contemplation of nature—for restoring proportion. Conversation, too, disperses vague dreads when they are named plainly among friends. The recommended remedies are modest: keep company with cheerful, truthful people; engage in serviceable tasks; avoid sensational tales and corrosive gossip. By choosing inputs and occupations, he suggests, one sustains a mind too busy with real, productive concerns to harbor unprofitable fears.
Later chapters widen the lens to communal experiences. Benson touches on public alarms—economic trouble, national crises, social change—and the contagion of excited talk. He observes the quiet fortitude of ordinary citizens who carry on their duties without display, noting that steadiness is more strengthening than occasional heroics. The book advances a civility founded on mutual confidence, practical kindness, and temperate speech. By turning attention outward, to help and to cooperate, individuals find their own fears reduced. Fear is shown to recede when people work together under clear aims, trusting that shared burdens grow lighter in common effort.
In conclusion, Where No Fear Was gathers its counsel into a modest ideal: a temper of mind where fear loses command, though it may still whisper. Benson does not promise immunity; he recommends a way of living—truthful thought, measured work, humane judgment, and friendly ties—that makes room for composure. The final emphasis falls on beginnings: small choices made daily, habits that accumulate, and a hopeful view that tomorrow can be met as today has been met. The book’s message is that freedom from fear is not a sudden victory but a steady clearing of space for peace.
Historical Context
Arthur Christopher Benson’s Where No Fear Was: A Book About Fear (1914) arises from late Victorian and Edwardian England, composed largely from the vantage of Cambridge, where Benson had been a fellow of Magdalene College since 1900 and would become Master in 1915. The book’s reflective essays move between the cloisters of the university, memories of Eton College (where he taught from 1885 to 1903), and domestic English interiors shaped by Anglican piety and class routine. It is set against a Britain at imperial peak yet laden with anxiety: urbanization, social reform, and an accelerating European crisis. London’s press culture, college common rooms, and country-house conversations form the social atmosphere in which Benson interrogates fear, conscience, and duty.
The Second Boer War (1899–1902) marked a pivotal imperial reckoning. Britain’s early defeats during “Black Week” (10–15 December 1899) at Stormberg, Magersfontein, and Colenso shocked a confident public. Prolonged sieges—Ladysmith, Kimberley, and Mafeking—revealed logistical strain, while the conflict’s ferocity culminated in scorched-earth tactics and concentration camps where approximately 28,000 Boer civilians died. Around 22,000 British military personnel perished. Benson, then an Eton master, saw former pupils commission as junior officers, absorbing casualty lists and patriotic rhetoric at close range. The book’s moral meditation on courage and inner steadiness mirrors the war’s lesson that official bravado can coexist with private dread, grief, and ethical ambiguity.
Pre-war tension and the outbreak of the First World War (1914) supply the book’s most pressing historical horizon, shaping its preoccupation with fear in public and private life. The Anglo-German naval rivalry intensified after Germany’s Naval Laws of 1898 and 1900 under Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz. Britain’s launch of HMS Dreadnought in 1906 and the “We want eight and we won’t wait” naval scare of 1909 dramatized an arms race. Continental crises—the Second Moroccan (Agadir) Crisis of 1911 and the Balkan Wars (1912–1913)—kept Europe on edge. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo on 28 June 1914 ignited the July Crisis; Germany’s invasion of Belgium brought Britain into war on 4 August 1914, citing obligations under the 1839 Treaty of London. In Cambridge, university and college contingents mobilized through the Officers’ Training Corps; lists of the fallen soon lengthened in chapels and halls. Benson, elected Master of Magdalene in 1915, presided over a community punctured by loss and worry, while London’s streets, recruiting stations, and hospitals made fear a civic currency. Where No Fear Was, published in 1914, does not narrate trenches; instead it addresses the moral psychology that wartime would test—the discipline of fear without panic, the claims of duty without hysteria, and the defense of conscience amid mass pressure. By tracing how anxiety arises from rumor, newspaper sensationalism, and herd opinion, Benson’s essays anticipate the home-front struggle to remain humane and lucid while catastrophe loomed. His reflections on death, responsibility, and spiritual composure thus register the immediate tensions of 1914 Britain and the longer pre-war season of alarm.
Religious controversy furnished a second frame for Benson’s reflections. His father, Edward White Benson, served as Archbishop of Canterbury (1883–1896) and issued the Lincoln Judgment (1890–1892), a landmark ruling attempting to settle disputes over ritualism within the Church of England. The era’s doctrinal tensions, alongside the disestablishment politics culminating in the Welsh Church Act (1914; implementation delayed until 1920), signaled institutional uncertainty. Within Benson’s own family, Robert Hugh Benson’s conversion to Roman Catholicism in 1903 crystallized a crisis of Anglican identity. Where No Fear Was translates these anxieties into spiritual inquiry, recasting fear not as superstition but as an instrument of self-scrutiny, humility, and ethically grounded faith.
The Liberal welfare reforms (1906–1914) and constitutional upheavals framed public debate on security and status. Major measures included the Old Age Pensions Act (1908), the Trade Boards Act (1909), Lloyd George’s “People’s Budget” (1909), the Parliament Act (1911) curbing the Lords’ veto, and the National Insurance Act (1911) introducing health and unemployment insurance. These policies coincided with the “Great Unrest” of 1910–1914—waves of strikes among miners, railwaymen, and dockworkers. Benson’s book engages the psychology of precariousness in an unequal society, examining fear of poverty, loss of position, and public disgrace. His analysis echoes the period’s contest between paternalism and collective provision, urging inward reform to complement social policy.
The women’s suffrage movement transformed the public sphere in the decade before 1914. The Women’s Social and Political Union (founded 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst) escalated militant tactics—window-smashing in 1912, arson campaigns, and persistent hunger strikes that provoked force-feeding in prisons. The Prisoners (Temporary Discharge for Ill Health) Act 1913, the “Cat and Mouse Act,” sought to manage activists’ releases and re-arrests. Emily Wilding Davison’s death after the Epsom Derby incident on 4 June 1913 intensified national debate. Benson’s reflections on fear, conscience, and moral courage map onto this climate, probing how individuals balance loyalty to law with claims of justice, and how public scorn amplifies private anxiety.
Shifts in medical and psychological thought reframed fear as a subject of study. The British Psychological Society was founded in 1901, while the Mental Deficiency Act (1913) reorganized state oversight of psychiatry. The term “neurasthenia,” common since the late nineteenth century, and, soon after, “shell shock” (formally described by Charles S. Myers in The Lancet, 1915) migrated into public vocabulary. Though Benson writes before the full visibility of war neuroses, Where No Fear Was treats dread and panic as phenomena that can be observed, named, and managed, not merely endured. His journals record cyclical moods, and the book advocates deliberate habits—reflection, routine, and sympathetic companionship—that resonate with contemporary efforts to dignify mental suffering and reduce stigma.
By anatomizing fear as a social force rather than a private weakness, the book critiques several Edwardian orthodoxies: the public-school cult of stoicism, imperial rhetoric that confuses bravado with virtue, and ecclesiastical authority that wields guilt as discipline. Benson exposes how press sensationalism, class deference, and institutional prestige coerce conformity, producing silent panic in the respectable and reckless confidence among the loud. His emphasis on conscience, reciprocity, and modest civic courage counters punitive attitudes toward poverty, dissent, and women’s activism. In highlighting the moral hazards of crowds and the pressure of reputation, he indicts a culture that prizes status over integrity, proposing inward discipline as a precondition for just public life.
