A Slavic People A Russian Superpower A Charismatic World Leader E-Book

Goeran B Johansson

• Herausgeber: Goeran B Johansson
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021

Beschreibung

A comprehensive analysis of the MH 17 tragedy over eastern Ukraine begins the book. It is followed by a review of ISIS and the background to the conflict in the Middle East in the shadow of the importance of oil and concerning the US Pax Americana advance. Further description of Russia's military rearmament occurs to a lesser extent, but the extremely dramatic development in the South China Sea is examined all the more. In the shadow of the refugee crisis, Sweden's situation and its historically unstable attitude towards Russia, and its focus on the United States is critically examined. Putin's strategy in Syria and the Middle East is analyzed in detail. Detailed source list

Leseprobe

A Slavic People

A Russian Superpower

A Charismatic World Leader

Goeran B Johansson

Copyright © 2022 Goeran B Johansson

All Rights Reserved

Goeran Johansson

[email protected]

ISBN 978-91-985513-9-6

Cover

Pastelldrawing by the Author after a photo of Vladimir Putin

No changes were done except replacing a picture of the Chinese J-20 in the Chapter: The Dramatic Developments in the South China Sea.

The first edition Published. 2016-17

With the Title :

Vladimir Putin: A Geostrategic Russian Icon, A Eurasian Continent, A Russian Superpower, A Charismatic World Leader.

ISBN 9781365681295 / ISBN E-BOOK 9783961643622

A Slavic People

A Russian Superpower

A Charismatic World Leader

Praeludium

Santa Fe, Bantayan Island, Philippines, July 17th, 2014

Malaysia Boeing MH17 over Eastern Ukraine’s War Zone, July 17th, 2014.

Various Downing Theories

Tank Destroying Mix of Ammunition Bullet holes in the Outer Skin

Reviews What Was the Most Likely Motive?

The Islamic Caliphate in the Syrian Civil War and its Consequences

A Reborn Russian Global Military Power in Action within the BRICS

The Latest Military Developments

Future Global Military Projects

The Dramatic Developments in the South China Sea

The Philippines Strongly Increasing Significance

Russia's and China's Joint Strategy

In Sweden

The Swedish View of Russia and President Vladimir Putin

Naive Sweden in the Epicenter of the Refugee Crisis

Sweden and NATO

Princeps Mundi

Vladimir Putin's Strategy in the Syrian Civil War and the Middle East

Towards a Gigantic Eurasian Continental Nationality-Based Superpower Constellation

Vladimir Putin and the Current Strategic Situation in Eurasia and Globally. A Brief Review and Summary.

The Global Upheaval

About Author

Index

Praeludium

Santa Fe, Bantayan Island, Philippines, July 17th, 2014

I got up early this morning since anything; I did not know what made me anxious. Menacing blue-black cumulus clouds loomed large on the horizon against Hagnaya on Cebu Island, about a 1-hour ferry ride or ten nautical miles away. But despite the intimidating atmosphere with a storm approaching, I began hesitantly move me the thirty meters down to the white beaches to pursue my daily gym workouts. Jogging three km along the shores, gymnastics with pushups sixty in three sections on twenty each on the beach, and swimming about five hundred meters. Then I went back to my room at LL Lodge to occupy a reasonably hearty breakfast, which I am always usually careful to do even in my home country, Sweden. But maybe then with the proviso, might well be added, that I down here in the tropics hardly drink good morning gruel or eat solid rye- porridge.

Here, it is usually a purely American breakfast or perhaps something between continental and American ditto consisting of cornflakes with refrigerated milk, crispy bacon, sometimes varied with dried and fried in butter dangit fish, toast, home-brewed Brazilian coffee with natural cream and sugar, freshly squeezed juice, either varied with fresh mango and pomelo.

Later this fateful day, I took out my relatively newly purchased good-sounding Alhambra P8 guitar and played through my repertoire to get the creative impulses. When I am playing, I can gather ideas and contexts for the advanced information the authorship certainly can be considered. Therefore, I started the daily program with two Renaissance melodies, "Cancion del Emperador" and "Guardame Las Vacas" by Luys Naraváez. It was closely followed by the introductory part of Johan Sebastian Bach's famous and fateful Chaconne, which makes itself superbly well on classical guitar even if it is written for solo violin, where I also played it before. Two waltzes followed this by Antonio Lauro. El Marabino and Carora and the somewhat equilibristic El Colibri by Julio S. Sagreras and two Brazilian favorites by Heitor Villa-Lobos, Prelude and Etude 1, both in E minor. Finally, my Latin American favorite, the Paraguayan Aire de Samba by Augustine Barrios Mangoré. After that, a little bit sore in the fingertips,

I went to the computer machine, an ASUS K54 F, a few years old but in good condition to continue writing my second book in the ongoing trilogy about Russian President Vladimir Putin and his progress. Still, it is not a wholly harmless process to change the world order and take away the US's intentions to unipolar rule the world alone with NATO as a world policeman.

At this particular moment, he was on his way home from a visit to Latin America and the BRICS conference in Fortaleza in Brazil on 14-16 July 2014. 1 He met with leaders of the most important countries on the continent. Cuba has been under sanctions imposed by its powerful northern neighbor for 50 years. Before the visit, the Russian Duma had granted a waiver of a multi-billion-dollar loan that Cuba received from the former Soviet Union. Besides Cuba, Russia entered into agreements with Brazil, Argentina, and Nicaragua. In Cuba, one supports the construction of power stations, an airfield, and a port. In addition, Russia will create a new canal between the Atlantic and the Pacific in Nicaragua. China also has a sizeable financial finger in the pie. It is a significant strategic project and a counterweight to the US-controlled Panama Canal. In Brazil and Argentina, this applies primarily to nuclear power installations. Thus, Russia has realized that one needs Cuba for the global strategic balance and to create military bases to support their naval and air forces. But Cuba also needs Russia's support in the confrontation with the United States, and she fully supports Russia's foreign policy. Even in the Crimea issue. "One does not need to build dozens of naval bases to ensure an entire presence in the Atlantic or Pacific. Two or three will be enough to provide a permanent company, "Victoria Legranova, a former expert on US military forces, says.

Developing the GLONASS satellite navigation system is crucial in these Latin American countries, which Russia expects as partners. Putin negotiated essential issues in this area concerning either the design or construction of GLONASS. It provides an opportunity to track possible US targets. To install the equipment is a simple matter, according to the Russian military expert Alexander Shirokorad. Let's say that the colonial powers want to exclude Argentina from the GPS because of its position concerning the Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas). It is then easy to switch to GLONASS instead. And this is the most crucial thing in this context that gives significant advantages since Argentina can precisely handle the “Falkland Islands "crisis. "This system allows determining the location of, for example, units of troops, the location of ships, armored columns. It allows conducting accurate missile strikes. That is, this system will increase the combat efficiency of the armed forces of Argentina," Vladimir Yevseyev, the director of the Center for Public Political Studies, told Pravda.Ru.

Argentineans became especially delighted when Putin used Argentina rather than the Anglo-Saxon “Falkland Islands." The Russian aid to Latin America's end goal is mainly to win support from Argentina and Brazil. So the final analysis of the visit to Latin America and China before becomes impossible to isolate Russia. It is necessary to build a new security system, but without military-technical cooperation, this is impossible. These two visits are considered strategically essential and highly caused by Kyiv's coup in February 2014.

I was impatiently waiting as it seemed to take forever for the computer to boot up. In the end, I came in at the desktop and clicked up my word document with book number two in order with the title. "Vladimir Putin. A Geostrategic Russian Icon. In the Shadow of Ukraine, "which I just was about to finalize before the publication. While waiting for the document to be uploaded, I went out on the Internet and checked the latest news.

Bolded headlines from most media worldwide met me with a Malaysian passenger plane that crashed over the Eastern part of Ukraine. There was talk about how it had been downed, but some ambiguities regarding the reason occurred. However, the following day, I saw a large number of headings. Here are some of them: The Times: "Blown Out of the Sky," New York Post "Murder at 33,000 feet, and “the Guardian” Murder in the Sky: Missile destroys jet and kills 295 '. Although I was deeply shocked, I was reading this and had difficulty taking on what happened and how it could have happened.

However, the days afterward, I saw two headlines that made me raise eyebrows. It was in the New York magazine, "Daily News" under the heading "Putin's War" and last but not least English Sun with the even bolder title "Putin's missile." I asked myself how the western media already the days after the disaster so determined that Putin's missile or war was the real reason. I decided to finish my second book in this series later in the autumn without further analyzing this tragic event because I wanted to investigate the accident.

Malaysia Boeing MH17 over Eastern Ukraine’s War Zone, July 17th, 2014.

Various Downing Theories

Numerous analyses, technical investigations, and speculations of all kinds appeared in the world press after the downing of the Malaysian airliner MH-17 over Eastern Ukraine on July 17th, 2014. I intend to focus on the most relevant theories and the most important in this context, namely the motive.

October 13, 2015, a final report came from Dutch Safety Board2, but it said the same as the Western media stubbornly brokered during the past year and that it was a Russian-made BUK- missile that downed the aircraft. One writes in the report on page 126 that no gunfire is causing cube-like, arch, or fly-shaped holes were found in the wreckage and the crew's bodies. Furthermore, one writes on page 127 that no military fighter aircraft were within a closer distance than thirty km at the attack time. Eyewitnesses contradict this assertion on the ground and Russian radar information. This information has been completely disregarded. On page 128, some short, medium, and long-range aircraft missiles are presented, all Russian. But from none of these, there were no traces either in the wreckage or in the pilots' bodies. So-called MANPADS, anti-aircraft missiles carried on the shoulder by soldiers, are entirely excluded as these only reach up to about 3000 meters. DSB believes that the warhead was a 9N314M because there were traces of both the cube that fly-arc-shaped (I-beam) shrapnel in both the wreckage and the pilots' bodies.

Also, DSB allowed Ukraine to examine the firing circumstances even though the missile was believed to have been fired from the Ukrainian territory. In purely legal terms, Ukraine is 100% responsible for it happened. Just as a criminal court would permit a suspect to self-examine what weapons he is accused of using when he murdered someone in his own house. It smells like a rat here, and the report also determines from which area and the size of the projectile could have been fired.

Global Research writes that the Russian Buk missile manufacturer Almaz-Antey has conducted its survey3to produce a more precise conclusion than the Dutch Safety Board report. The article criticized the DSB study in that "The 279-page report is full of commonplace charts and infographics. But when it comes to important data and assessments, it exposes a 320 sqr km zone of the “possible launching site” and mispresents the type of BUK missile which hit the Malaysian Boeing (“9M38 and 9M38M1 missiles” while no signs of specific I-beam striking elements of 9M38M1 missile were found on the wrecked parts of the fuselage. On the contrary, the new Almaz-Antey investigation report was made public almost simultaneously on Tuesday and gave a comprehensive and detailed picture to a definite conclusion: a missile was launched from Zaroshchenskoe, under the Ukrainian Defence Forces control at this time. The conclusion was based on thorough and transparent research including computer modeling and a full-scale real experiment conducted on October 7, 2015.”

As a result of this experiment, as Almaz Antey's hypothesis, a missile was launched from Snezhnoe (under rebel control), is rejected.

When it comes to the missile type, it is about the difference between 9M38 and 9M38M1, whose striking elements are exposed through the Almaz-Antey - Group investigation.

“The fact is that there were no holes caused by I-Beam type elements on the fuselage of the Malaysian Boeing. That means that it was downed by the 9M38 missile compatible with only the first-generation BUK 9К37 launcher, which was produced in the Soviet Union in 1978-1986. Many BUK complexes were on service in the Ukraine-based Soviet Army Air Defense regiments and were left there after the collapse of the Soviet Union.”

Paul Craig Roberts, a well-known and respected American columnist who previously worked for US President Ronald Reagan, presents arguments against the DSB report.

On the other hand, DSB criticizes Ukraine for not having closed the airspace over the war zone. But no accusations against Russia are given in the report. Neither is given any motive or someone responsible for the catastrophic event.

However, the report has been received with mixed comments worldwide. Russia is far away because the DSB has not accepted the Almaz Antey (BUK missile manufacturer) cooperation in the investigation. What is remarkable is that the DSB report establishes the same thing as the rabid Russian hostile Western media propaganda the days after the downing, namely a BUK -missile but not by whom it was fired or on whose orders.

The first and most crucial question is why the aircraft changed course on this particular day when one usually flew a route that went far to the west. On July 17, Vladimir Putin passed back from the BRICS conference in Fortaleza in Brazil. He satisfied himself with support against the Western sanctions and initiated the BRICS bank. A serious competitor to the World Bank and the global financial Wall Street elite with the Rothschild and Rockefeller family is significant to point out in this context with only about thirty minutes interval between the presidential plane and the Malaysian Boeing aircraft. In Gaza, there was a fierce Israeli offensive and, on the ground, in eastern Ukraine, intense fighting between Ukrainian forces and pro-Russian separatists went on. A Ukrainian brigade was surrounded, and they had the Russian border behind their back.

The course change into the war zone is primarily analyzed in detail by the Canadian professor Michel Chussodovsky titled:

Was the Ukrainian Ministry of Interior behind the Downing of the Malaysian Airlines MH17?” 4

Professor Chossudovsky: “Of significance, the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Yarema confirmed that the Donetsk rebels do not have BUK or S - 300 ground-to-air missiles which could have downed the plane.” According to the Kyiv Posts report” “Ukrainian prosecutor general says militants did not seize Ukrainian air defense launchers. Members of illegal armed units have not seized air defense launchers of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Donetsk,” Ukrainian Prosecutor General Vitaliy Yarema said. (Kyiv Post) Yet what appears to be contradictory in these various statements is that immediately after the downing of MH17, an adviser to the Ukrainian Minister of Internal Affairs, Mr. Anton Gerashchenko, categorically stated that the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 MH17: “had been downed by an air defense missile system Buk” (without however mentioning who was behind the missile operation). “

According to the Ukraine Interfax News Agency Anton Gerashchenko, “said on Facebook that the plane was flying at an altitude of 33,000 feet when it was hit by a missile fired from a Buk launcher.” According to the Strait Times: Mr. Gerashchenko was quoted as saying: “A civilian airliner traveling from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur has just been shot down by a Buk anti-aircraft system… Two hundred eighty passengers and fifteen crew have been killed.”

Gerashchenko runs a ministry of interior propaganda program at the www.stopterror.in.ua see also http://uacrisis.org/anton-gerashhenko.

How could he have been familiar with this piece of information of a military nature before implementing a survey on the ground unless the Interior Ministry was directly involved? It should be noted that the Ministry of Interior was mainly under the control of the two neo-Nazi parties and Svoboda Rights and was responsible for "internal" military operations directed against insurgents in Lugansk and Donbas in coordination with the Armed Forces. The Ministry oversees both the Ministry of the Interior Troops of Ukraine (Внутрішні війська України, Vnutrisni Viys'ka Ukrayiny (VVU)) as well as the National Guard, which is integrated with the right sector militias.

According to the Spanish air traffic Carlos (who later disappeared) at the Kyiv Borisol airport, there was an unexplained change of course by the Malaysian MH17. This route took the aircraft directly over the Eastern Ukraine warzone. The Spanish air controller intimates that the order to down the plane came from the Ministry of the Interior (Ministry of Internal Affairs) and not the Military. He also said the MH17 flight was escorted by Ukrainian fighter jets minutes before it was downed. “The fighters flew close to the 777, up to 3 minutes before it disappeared from the radar.”

It is worth noting that eyewitness reports in the Donetsk region confirmed the presence of Ukrainian fighter jets reported by the Spanish air traffic control. These witnesses, however, have entirely been ignored by the West in the accident investigation.

What is of significance is that the announcement of the aircraft's downing (a missile) by Kyiv was almost immediate. According to the Spanish air traffic controller, the air control tower was informed of an aircraft's downing at 12.00 hours, approximately ten minutes after it disappeared from the radar screen. How could they have known unless they had concrete details on how it was shot down? Malaysia Airlines B777 plane just disappeared from the radar, and Kyiv military authority informed us of the downing. How could they know this?”

According to an air traffic controller, the information did not emanate from the Ministry of Defense: “Interior Minister knew what the fighters were doing in the area; the defense minister didn’t. Members of the Military confirm. It was Ukraine, but I still do not know where the order came from”

For those who do not know, let’s say, there are military under the orders of the defense minister and military under the Interior minister's rules. The Spanish air traffic controller intimates that there were members of the military who were taking orders from the Ministry of the Interior: “The military under the orders of Interior Minister knew what happened all the time. Military commanders here (ATC) control tower; confirm that the missile is from the Ukrainian army,”

A German pilot and expert, Peter Haisenko, 5has come up with shocking information regarding that MH 17 would have been shot down by Ukrainian combat aircraft and not by any BUK missile. A reputed freestanding investigative American historian, Eric Zuesse, who takes up Peter Haisenko's information in an article, says that Google removed the photo and info that Peter Haisenko had posted. But he had saved the material on his computer, and it is now available. Haisenko recommends that you click on the picture and download the photo as a PDF in good resolution.

Haisenko further: ” This is necessary because that will allow you to understand what I am describing here. The facts speak clearly and loudly and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. The smaller holes are round and clean, showing the entry points most likely of a 30-millimeter caliber projectile. In sifting through the available images, one thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections behind the cockpit is mostly intact, except for the fact that only fragments of the aircraft remained. Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. A missile in the central portion did not hit this aircraft. Therefore, the destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material. This is because the nose of all aircraft may need to withstand a large bird's effects at high speeds. You can see in the photo that in this area, significantly stronger aluminum alloys were being installed than in the remainder of the fuselage's outer skin. One remembers the crash of Pan Am over Lockerbie. It was a large segment of the cockpit that survived the crash in one piece due to the unique architecture. In the case of flight MH 017, it becomes abundantly clear that there also an explosion took place inside the aircraft.”

Tank Destroying Mix of Ammunition Bullet holes in the Outer Skin

Haisenko “So what could have happened? Russia recently published radar recordings that confirm at least one Ukrainian SU 25 near MH 017. This corresponds with the statement of the now missing Spanish controller ‘Carlos’ that has seen two Ukrainian fighter aircraft in the immediate vicinity of MH 017. Suppose we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25. In that case, we learn this: It is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, types GST-302 / AO-17A, equipped with: a 250-round magazine of incendiary anti-tank shells and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has been fired from both sides: the entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of its cockpit segment! Now consider what happens when a series of incendiary anti-tank shells and splinter-explosive shells hit the cockpit. These are, after all, designed to destroy a modern tank. The incendiary anti-tank shells partially traversed the cockpit and exited on the other side in a slightly deformed shape. (Aviation forensic experts could find them on the ground presumably controlled by the Kyiv Ukrainian military; the translator). After all, their impact is designed to penetrate the solid armor. Also, the splinter-explosive shells will, due to their effects numerous to cause massive explosions inside the cockpit since they are designed to do this. Given the GST-302 cannon's rapid firing sequence, it will cause a rapid succession of explosions within the cockpit area in a short time. Remember, each of these is sufficient to destroy a tank.”

Haisenkos assumption regarding SU-25 can be modified here as a SU 25 cannot either the speed or the maximum height to access an airliner at that altitude. It is a relatively old plane specially designed for low-flying attacks and a relatively low rate against armored columns. Cruising altitude is 16 000 feet, and a maximum height without weapons load is only 23 000 feet. Also, the cockpit of a SU-25 has no pressurized cabin, so the plane cannot fly higher than 16,000 feet. Or can it still do this under certain circumstances?

In an article "MH-17 One Year Later, “6Vineyard of the Saker, a US military strategist, and analyst, believes that the aircraft may have been downed by a Ukrainian SU 25 anyway through various technically elaborate maneuvers. The Vineyard of the Saker “First, while it is true that the cabin of the SU-25 is not pressurized, all a pilot needs to do is use a mask to supply him with oxygen. The aircraft itself can easily fly well over the 7000-meter limit. It is true that the speed of the aircraft is inadequate to intercept a large civilian jet flying at its cruising speed. The SU-25 engines were never designed to fly high, and while they can be made to bring the aircraft over 7’000 meters, they cannot develop enough speed in this rarefied atmosphere. But what the SU-25 can do is to carry an R-60 infrared-guided missile. Not only does such a missile not require an engagement radar, but its speed is over 3’000 kilometers per hour, way faster than any civilian airliner. However, the problem with the missile is that its range is short, about 8’000 meters. The SU-25 does not have a radar capable of detecting civilian airliners and guiding the SU-25 towards it. But the Buk missile radar battery definitely does. Since the course of the MH-17 was known well in advance, all the Ukrainians had to do was to keep one or two SU-25 loitering at low altitude under the air corridor which MH-17 would take and wait for the Buk missile operators to guide the best-placed SU-25 towards the airliner at the appropriate moment. All the pilot would have to do when given the signal was to sharply climb towards MH-17 and get inside the missile’s flight envelope (in this case, within less than 8 kilometers of MH-17) and then fire off its R-60 missile. At that point, the missile would guide itself towards the aircraft's biggest heat source – one of the engines. The R-60 is a rather small missile, and it would never be able to destroy a large airliner like the Malaysia Airways Boeing 777. But the R-60 is more than capable of destroying one of Boeing’s engines. At this point, the airliner would rapidly lose speed and enter into a sharp turn while the pilots would be trying to figure out what happened, extinguish a burning engine, and compensate for the increased drag. This is exactly what was observed on radars, by the way. The rapid loss of speed and altitude would make the Boeing easy prey for the SU-25, which has a powerful cannon on board which would then easily catch up and finishes off the attack with a volley of 30mm cannon fire. Having finished off its target, the SU-25 would sharply turn and return to its base. This is exactly what the Russian radars saw. One might wonder why the Ukrainian would use a close air support aircraft like the SU-25 instead of a dedicated interceptor like the SU-27 or a fighter like the MiG-29. Here again, the explanation is straightforward: not only does Ukraine have many more SU-25s than SU-27s or MiG-29s, but these would also be very conspicuous to any witness. In contrast, the one (or possibly two) SU-25s tasked with the destruction of MH-17 would be very easy to conceal in eastern Ukraine and on any airfield. It is precise because the SU-25 would be an unlikely aircraft to be given such a mission that it is the perfect aircraft to execute what is a textbook example of a false flag attack.”

Thereupon Saker finally observes, “As for the Buk, it is such a big and conspicuous missile system that it is impossible to hide. Furthermore, had such a missile been fired in broad daylight, the launch would have been clearly seen for many miles around. However, as long as all the Buk battery was doing is guiding the SU-25 towards MH-17, nobody would have noticed it. Nobody except the Russians, NATO, and the US, of course.”

Both the US and Russia certainly know in detail what happened through their military satellites. Yet, the US refused to release the data while Russia made it. This behavior from the US side is a clear sign that all is not right.

Since the shooting is a pure war crime, an ICC, International Criminal Court, an investigation is likely to be conducted in the future.

Reviews What Was the Most Likely Motive?

We can see now that there are different views on what was technically causing the downing of the aircraft. West says a BUK missile downed the plane, precisely as one said already the days after the crash, although no investigation or facts for the claim emerged. Russia has entirely different aspects of the events and presented satellite data for their claims. These, however, were rejected by the West. What is requested is the subject, and there are some theories about this.

However, an authentic, credible design from the West´s side to demonize Russia and President Vladimir Putin was for sure. Everything is about Putin's ongoing plans to change the world order and prevent the United States from leading the world in its self-imposed solitary solo role. Then, under Putin´s leadership, Russia is offending herself with powerful financial interests in the West and overall globalists' plans. Putin is de facto the only world leader who dares to stand up against the West and NATO's global hegemony plans.

At the time of July 2014, when the Malaysia MH17 crash occurred was especially critical. There are several "theories" of which I will devote myself to two of these.

The first theory is based on the entire course of events that attempted to shoot down Vladimir Putin’s presidential aircraft. An American analyst wrote an article with the following dramatic title: "The ECM (Electronic Counter Measure) Battle in the Sky above Poland, Russia, and Ukraine That Saved Putin's Life but Downed MH17 7.

Sterling hardly gives the impression of being utterly credible at first glance, but the combination approach/motive is fascinating.

Lord Sterling: “When the US President travels, he flies on one of two identical Boeing 747-200B USAF Presidential State Aircraft. He is riding in officially designated as Air Force One; the other is carrying staff and reporters, etc., but is also acting as a decoy aircraft, making the task of shooting down the correct Boeing 747 more difficult. The planes have constant fighter coverage with AWACS and refueling tankers. In areas over the ocean, the US Navy has been known to re-task supercarrier task forces to provide USN fighter coverage when necessary. Plus, the US has more than five hundred military bases globally scattered. Now Russia remains a nuclear superpower, but it no longer is the overall superpower that the old Soviet Union was with its Warsaw Pact allies. There is no Warsaw Pact now, and many of these nations are members of NATO. The USSR is broken up and long gone. So, Russia cannot provide the level of protection to its Presidential State Aircraft, an IL-96-300PU that the American President has. Still, the Russians make special efforts to keep their Head of State safe. Considering the level of pre-WWIII events currently happening in Ukraine and the Middle East and the growing irritation that Globalists and Zionist forces have had with Putin and his Russia, the security experts charged with protecting Putin were undoubtedly very concerned about his long overseas visit. “

Putin was, after all, especially in Latin America to gain support against the sanctions from the West, which was vital for Russia. Putin effectively stopped the West's plan for an attack against Iran in 2012, and the West and the Zionists planned an attack against Syria in 2013. Of the 624 missiles deployed against Assad's forces, some were downed by Russian warships in the Mediterranean Sea when they were on their way from a base in Italy, and then the US and NATO gave up the attempt. According to Stratfor´s George Friedman, this was followed by the most blatant coup in history8 as a letter at the post to demonstrate Russia’s geographical vulnerability. AFTER ALL, the BRICS - meeting in Brazil was a direct challenge against the Rothschild-led global banking cartel's power over the economic and financial system and crucial for the possible decision to eliminate the Russian President. With the coup in Kyiv, the Mother of Russia, the West wanted to get Russia involved in a war in Ukraine. At the same time, an Israeli assault against Gaza went on, and it is worth mentioning in the context that the "Arab Spring" with its revolutions, according to Putin, was completely CIA-funded.

Sterling; “Taking the Russian State Aircraft down presented some problems. If it were downed over the open ocean, fingers would point at America as the superpower capable of global military action. Host nations did provide considerable security to Putin and his aircraft while he was in their nations and airspace. What better place to attack the IL-96 than over Russian airspace near Ukraine, shortly after it had left Polish airspace. At worst, the junta in Ukraine would be blamed. Moscow might invade Ukraine in response, thereby tying down its military and freeing the Mideast for a truly horrific general war. The Russians were well aware of the dangers and actively looked for stealth fighters and mobile ground-to-air advanced systems with state-of-the-art airborne sensors. A few years ago, Russian engineers devised a way to 'stealth' existing non-stealthy aircraft using a plasma system. This system has been reported on and no doubt copied by various western powers. Now no stealth system is perfect, and in fact, the whole stealth field has had its share of PR hype. The attempt is to create a 'black hole' in the sky that no radar or infrared/etc. Signals are capable of being detected. However, no such system is perfect, and highly advanced electronic systems usually detect a stealth aircraft (human-crewed or crewless) operating in a given area. Based on various reports and general knowledge of military systems, including ECM (electronic countermeasures), I believe this happened in the skies over Poland, Russia, and Ukraine, leading to the deaths of two hundred ninety-eight people on Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17. Russian Air Force electronic surveillance/ECM aircraft could detect a stealth fighter in/near the expected flight path of the Russian State Aircraft.Since shooting down this aircraft was not a certainty, especially since the Ukrainian Junta had just moved some advanced 'Buk' ground-to-air missile systems into eastern Ukraine, the Russian ECM aircraft immediately began to spoof things. The IL-96 was likely contacted by satellite secure radio transmissions and told to turn off or change its ID squawking. A nearby large aircraft, the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 Flight MH17, was spoofed to cover its standard ID code and replace it with the IL-96 code. In the meantime, the Israeli Air Force F-15 (likely an F-15I two-seat Strike Eagle with AIM-20 AMRAAM radar-guided missiles, (A US-made air to air medium-range rocket which is used on most US combat aircraft. Authors note) and using a plasma stealth system, which had taken off some time, from a base in Azerbaijan, before the IL-96 was in Poland, was positing itself in a 'kill box' anticipating the known altitude, speed, route, and time window of the Russian jet.This is where the Russians use ECM to protect the Presidential State Aircraft of Russia. They knew that the IL-96 and a similar-sized Boeing 777 (Flight MH17) were traveling along the same route over Poland. “

“The Malaysian airliner was now being electronically spoofed by Russian ECM to give the ID of the IL-96. The Israeli flight crew knew that the plane was over Ukrainian airspace, but just barely, and it closed to make visual contact. What it saw was a white large airliner-sized plane. It launched a radar-guided AIM-20 AMRAAM missile from a few miles away to lessen the radar jamming expected to be on the IL-96 and destroyed the target and quickly exited the local area.”

“I can say that Putin’s plane and the Malaysian Boeing intersected at the same point and the same echelon. That was close to Warsaw on a 330-m echelon at the height of 10,100 meters. The presidential jet was there at 16:21 Moscow time and the Malaysian aircraft – 15:44 Moscow time,” a source told the news agency on condition of anonymity. “The contours of the aircraft are similar, linear dimensions are also very similar, as for the coloring, at a quite remote distance they are almost identical,” the source added. Early reports are always most important as they are given and reported before a cover-up can be initiated. They quoted multiple witnesses on the ground that a fighter had fired a missile hitting the airliner, bringing it down. The witnesses thought that the fighter was a Ukrainian fighter, such as a Su-27 with a twin-tail and from a distance looks similar to an F-15 with its twin-tail. The Russians have no advantage to 'outing' the real story. For one thing, they helped, by using ECM, to cause MH17 to be shot down. Secondly, without a downed Israeli F-15I to prove the story, it would merely be a "he said, she said" story that the Israelis and Ukrainians would deny.”

Another very scary and exciting posting appears in an article, "Obama ordered the shooting down of flight MH017 9"," which was published in the National Report.net on August 5, 2014. This forum is an established American independent news page that is likely to be particularly well informed. But what makes it all extremely interesting and highly controversial is that the article is entirely removed from the Web. You come to the National Report and the item, but when you want to read further, you get a 404-error message. Why, one may ask? However, like the German pilot Haisenko I cited recently, I have a saved PDF file, and now I am mentioning directly what is stated in the article.