An Axiom of Chirality as the Basic Principle of Physics E-Book

Hans Wehrli

• Herausgeber: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG)
• Kategorie: Wissenschaft und neue Technologien
• Sprache: Deutsch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020

Beschreibung

Warum sind die Naturgesetze so, wie sie sind? Der Autor entwickelt eine Strategie, nach welcher eine Theorie gefunden werden kann, welche Relativitäts- und Quantentheorie, die Naturkonstanten, die vier Wechselwirkungen und alle Elementarteilchen einheitlich beschreibt. Die Naturgesetze sind so, wie sie sein müssen, damit Wahrnehmung möglich ist. Unendlichkeit, eine Zeit, in der nichts passiert und ein Raum ohne Objekte sind nicht per se empirisch wahrnehmbar, weshalb auf diese metaphysischen Begriffe verzichtet wird. Das Axiom A=A widerspricht sich selbst, weshalb es durch ein neues «Chiralitätsaxiom» ersetzt wird. Erst dieses Axiom ermöglicht es, Wahrnehmungen in unserem Bewusstsein zu ordnen. Der Begriff des Schwarzen Loches wird erweitert. Raum, Zeit, Substanz und Wechselwirkung sind nur noch verschiedene Aspekte der mathematisch neu definierten Wesenheit Ereignis. Ereignisse sind empirisch zählbar.

Leseprobe

Hans Wehrli

An Axiom of Chirality as the Basic Principle of Physics

Impressum

Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikationin der Deutschen Nationalbibliographie; detaillierte bibliographischeDaten sind im Internet über http://dnd.d-nb.de abrufbar

wbg Academic ist ein Imprint der wbg© 2019 by wbg (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), DarmstadtDie Herausgabe des Werkes wurde durch dieVereinsmitglieder der wbg ermöglicht.Satz und eBook: Satzweiss.com Print, Web, Software GmbH

Besuchen Sie uns im Internet: www.wbg-wissenverbindet.de

ISBN 978-3-534-40243-4

Elektronisch sind folgende Ausgaben erhältlich:eBook (PDF): 978-3-534-40245-8eBook (epub): 978-3-534-40244-1

Menü

Buch lesen

Innentitel

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Informationen zum Buch

Informationen zum Autor

Impressum

Contents

1 Philosophy of Physics

2 Contradictions between Physics and Mathematical Models of Physics

3 The Model of Chirality Theory

4 Physical Interpretation

5 Comparison of Chirality Theory with Other Theories

6 Open Questions

References

1 Philosophy of Physics

The century-long, vain search for a comprehensive physical theory which makes the theory of relativity compatible with quantum theory and is able to describe all known interactions compels us to look for fundamentally new ideas. Fundamentally new ideas in a science always call for changes in the corresponding metascience. In the case of physics, that is metaphysics in its narrower sense, i.e. the science of language and methods of physics. In an on-going work, therefore, the basic metaphysical conditions – which are to comply with a physical theory – are examined, so that nature can be described as close to reality as possible. To do this, a dialogue between physics and philosophy is required. Most physicists underestimate the effect of their own epistemological prejudices on their research [Weinberg (1999); Rovelli (2010), 415]. Today natural laws are usually found by looking for experimental regularities with empirical perceptions of nature, whereas the metaphysical preconditions for the perceptions are ignored. With chirality theory, the laws of nature are as they must be for perception to be possible. The laws are not derived from nature, but as with Immanuel Kant [Kant (1783/2001)] and C.F. von Weizsäcker [Weizsäcker (1999)] from the way nature can be perceived, that is, from metaphysics in a narrower sense. This is the first paradigm shift of the new chirality theory.

It cannot be a task of this article to construct an axiomatic system for chirality theory. A mathematician once told me that for this goal 200 mathematicians and physicists would have to work for 20 years. But in a rather philosophical article like this it is necessary to list the contradictions between the usual axioms and physical perception. This concerns mainly the axioms of infinity and identity. The first is the main cause of the incompatibility of relativity theory with quantum theory, the latter for the neglecting of chirality as the basic principle of order in physics. However, there is no need to build up a complete axiomatic for chirality theory to understand the main ideas of its strategy.

In order to avoid misunderstandings, a few linguistic questions should be clarified from the outset. Languages have their limitations, which cannot in principle be overcome. Among other things, the meaning of the words or symbols is always vague, because for their definition one needs further words, which for their part, need to be defined in turn. If, for example, one defines space as the sum of all points and the point as an infinitely small place in space, then the definition turns in a circle. Such cycles are fundamentally inevitable, even if every child has a certain conception of what a point is and what space is. Nevertheless, there are a few important terms, as they are to be understood in this work, which should be defined.