139,99 €
"This standard assumes that the structure, after completion, is used as intended in the project and subject to planned inspection and maintenance to meet the expected project lifetime and to detect any unforeseen weakness or behavior" (EN 13670 §4.1) An important decision factor in the design of new structures and repairs to existing structures is the lifetime or expected service life. This concept, which is common for civil engineering works, has been extended to all engineering and building works by applying the European Structural Design Codes. This book tries to take stock of the inspection methodologies related to each type of civil engineering work, the various pathologies of concrete structures, and gives examples of the writing of reports.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 241
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017
Cover
Title
Copyright
Introduction
1 Inspection of Structures: Methodologies
1.1. Bridges
1.2. Structures for the retention and transportation of liquids
1.3. Storage structures for petroleum products
1.4. Maritime structures
1.5. Silos
1.6. Gantry, metal hanger and high masts
2 Concept of Resistance of Materials: Application to Reinforced Concrete
2.1. General information on reinforced concrete
2.2. Concrete material
2.3. Steels
2.4. Concept of strength of materials
3 Pathology of Structures
3.1. Pathology of concrete structures
3.2. The pathology of masonry structures
3.3. The pathology of composite material structures
4 Techniques for Repairing Civil Engineering Works
4.1. Repair of concrete structures
4.2. Protection of concrete structure
4.3. Underground recovery
5 Inspection and Maintenance of Structures in the United States: Methodologies
5.1. Engineering structures
5.2. Storage structures for petroleum products
Appendices
Appendix 1: Examples of Diagnosis on a Drinking Water Storage Structure Based on the CEMAGREF Method
A1.1. Description of the structure
A1.2. Conditions for development of the structure
A1.3. Information relating to the inspection
A1.4. Inspection of the structure
A1.5. Summary
A1.6. Conclusion
A1.7. Supplementary material
Appendix 2: Examples of Diagnosis on a Petroleum Products Storage Tank According to the DT 92 Method
A2.1. Origin and extent of the mission
A2.2. Description of the structure
A2.3. Investigation method
A2.4. Nature of damages and explanations
A2.5. Executive summary of the condition of the structure and its evolution
Appendix 3: Examples of Diagnosis of a Marine Structure Using the CETMEF VSC Method
A3.1. Appendix 3a: Periodic detailed inspection of 2009 campaign
A3.2. Appendix 3b: Directory of pathologies
A3.3. Appendix 3c: Sclerometer indices
A3.4. Appendix 3d: results of pachometric tests on slabs
Appendix 4: Inspection Report “Gantries, Metal Hangers and High Masts”
A4.1. Identification
A4.2. General characteristics
A4.3. Life of the structure
A4.4. Conditions for access
A4.5. General information
A4.6. Annotation of findings
A4.7. Gantry
A4.8. Conclusions
A4.9. Actions to be taken
Appendix 5: Measuring Equipment
Appendix 6: Inspections of Bridges
Bibliography
Index
End User License Agreement
Introduction
Table I.1. Indicative design working life
1 Inspection of Structures: Methodologies
Table 1.1. Periodic inspections table
Table 1.2. Periodic detailed inspections table
Table 1.3. Exceptional inspections table
Table 1.4. Qualification level table
Table 1.5. Methodology for evaluating structures
Table 1.6. Stakeholder qualification levels
Table 1.7. Classification of damages table
Table 1.8. Classification of structures according to the level of danger
Table 1.9. Periodicity table according to DT92
Table 1.10. Corrosion sacrificial thickness according to EC3
Table 1.11. Evaluation of the mechanical state table
Table 1.12. Evaluation of the state table
Table 1.13. Actions to be taken table
Table 1.14. EN 1991-4: Appendix C
Table 1.15. Level of inspection table
Table 1.16. Class of structure table
2 Concept of Resistance of Materials: Application to Reinforced Concrete
Table 2.1. Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete
Table 2.2. Properties of reinforcement
3 Pathology of Structures
Table 3.1. Different types of cracks
Table 3.2. Causes of premature cracking
Table 3.3. Limiting values for exposure classes according to EN 206
Table 3.4. ISR: category of consequences
Table 3.5. Exposure classes
Table 3.6. Conditions to respect level of prevention
Table 3.7. Sensitive minerals table
Table 3.8. Concrete chemical analysis
Table 3.9. Concrete chemical parameters
Table 3.10. Different types of matrices
Table 3.11. Characteristics of different resins
Table 3.12. Chemical resistance of different resins
Table 3.13. Summary table of the advantages and disadvantages for each type of fiber
Table 3.14. Compatibility between resins and fibers
Table 3.15. Association matrix/fiber
Table 3.16. Chemical compatibilities and incompatibilities
Table 3.17. Energy from radiations
Table 3.18. Mechanical characteristics of single fiber
4 Techniques for Repairing Civil Engineering Works
Table 4.1. Mechanical characteristics of composite fabrics
Table 4.2. Comparison between reinforcement by bonded metal plates and CFT
Table 4.3. Advantages and disadvantages of the dry and wet methods
Table 4.4. Cement dosage at the manufacturing of the shotcretes according to their target use and the cement content of the concrete in place Adapted from the document by AFTES
Table 4.5. Table of characteristics for different mortars
Table 4.6. Table 3.4 from EN 1992-1-1
5 Inspection and Maintenance of Structures in the United States: Methodologies
Table 5.1. Degradation index of structures
Table 5.2. List of civil engineering works to be inspected according to the API 653
Appendix 1: Examples of Diagnosis on a Drinking Water Storage Structure Based on the CEMAGREF Method
Table A1.1. General description
Table A1.2. Accessibility
Table A1.3. Measured coatings and carbonation thickness
Table A1.4. Nature of defects
Table A1.5. State of structure
Appendix 2: Examples of Diagnosis on a Petroleum Products Storage Tank According to the DT 92 Method
Table A2.1. Notatio
Appendix 3: Examples of Diagnosis of a Marine Structure Using the CETMEF VSC Method
Table A3.1. Characteristics of the structure
Table A3.2. Measured covering
Table A3.3. Measured covering
Table A3.4. Measured covering
Table A3.5. State of structure
Appendix 5: Measuring Equipment
Table A5.1. List of measuring equipment
Appendix 6: Inspections of Bridges
Table A6.1. Details of annual inspection
Table A6.2. Details of triennal visit
Table A6.3. Details of specific visits
Table A6.4. Details of periodic detailed inspections
Table A6.5. Details of Initial detailed report
Table A6.6. Details of End of contractual warranty visits
Table A6.7. Details of Exceptional detailed inspections
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
C1
iii
iv
v
ix
x
xi
xii
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
325
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
e1
Series EditorGilles Pijaudier-Cabot
Xavier Lauzin
First published 2017 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:
ISTE Ltd27-37 St George’s RoadLondon SW19 4EUUK
www.iste.co.uk
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.111 River StreetHoboken, NJ 07030USA
www.wiley.com
© ISTE Ltd 2017The rights of Xavier Lauzin to be identified as the author of this work have been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017939369
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication DataA CIP record for this book is available from the British LibraryISBN 978-1-78630-186-4
An important factor in the design of new structures and repairs to existing structures is the expected service life.
In France, for major civil engineering works such as bridges, this duration is around 100 years (the British even go as far as 120 years).
For more modest structures such as water treatment plants, storage silos, etc., this duration was tacitly defined as around 50 years.
There are many factors that can influence this:
– the nature of the materials used in the construction (masonry, steel, concrete, wood, etc.);
– the quality of these materials (high-performance concrete, stainless steel, etc.);
– the constructive arrangements used (accumulation of water on metal structures, lack of encapsulation of steel in a reinforced concrete structure, etc.);
– quality of the execution (quality of the welding, implementation of concrete, etc.);
– monitoring and maintenance.
Within the context of the European Regulation for Calculation and Implementation, all these criteria have been taken into account when determining the duration of use of a structure.
This means that the design of the structures is obsolete if the maintenance conditions are not respected.
Let us recall section 2.4 of EN 1990:
“2.4 Durability
(1) The structure shall be designed such that deterioration over its design working life does not impair the performance of the structure below that intended, having due regard to its environment and the anticipated level of maintenance.
(2) In order to achieve an adequately durable structure, the following should be taken into account:
– the intended or foreseeable use of the structure;
– the required design criteria;
– the expected environmental conditions;
– the composition, properties and performance of the materials and products;
– the properties of the soil;
– the choice of the structural system;
– the shape of members and the structural detailing;
– the quality of workmanship, and the level of control;
– the particular protective measures;
–
the intended maintenance during the design working life
”.
The question also arises for repairs carried out on a structure: what life expectancy should they be given?
With regard to new structures, EN 1990 indicates the following durations in Table I.1.
Table I.1.Indicative design working life
Design working life category
Indicative design working-life (years)
Examples
1
10
Temporary structures
a
2
10–25
Replaceable structural elements, for example rolling beams, supporting devices
3
15–30
Agricultural structures and the like
4
50
Buildings and other structures
5
100
Monumental structures of buildings, bridges and other civil engineering structures
aStructures or parts of structures that can be disassembled for reuse should not be considered as temporary.
In the section “Execution of concrete structures”, section 4.1 of EN 13670 also specifies the need for an inspection program:
“(5) This standard assumes that the structure after completion is used as intended in the design and submitted to planned inspection and maintenance necessary to achieve the intended design working life and to detect weaknesses or any unexpected behavior”.
This requirement implies providing access to the main structural elements at the design level.
Examples include:
– suspended bridges where replacement of the suspension has not been studied at design stage;
– water treatment plants for which it was not possible to empty the tanks (nonbypassable treatment line).
It also implies the need for a “state 0” during the reception for new constructions as well as a structure maintenance plan.
From this state, the sequence of tasks that is required to guarantee the duration of use of the structures is presented in the figure below:
Figure I.1.Sequence of tasks required to guarantee the duration
The purpose of this book is to create an inventory of the methodologies used for inspections of civil engineering structures and to present the elements that can serve as a basis for the diagnosis and maintenance program of concrete structures.
We present the main topics that the reader can deepen their knowledge of by reading the standards cited.
How to use this guide
For a better understanding of the methodology used, in the last part of each inspection methodology listed in Chapter 1 is a paragraph about “points of to look out for”, which refers to Chapter 3 for probable causes of the pathology and to Chapter 4 for the means of reinforcement that can be considered.
Chapter 2 gives the basic notions of resistance of the materials that are required for proper comprehension of the behavior of concrete and the interpretation of the observed disorders.
The examples in the Appendix are informative; they aim to show a type of connection in adequation with the inspected structure. They are purely formal.
Inspection and diagnosis of structures are the most important phases of a maintenance operation and, eventually, of renovation. They require asking oneself a few questions before discussing the planning and recovery solution.
The questions are generally the following:
– what is the typology of the damage?
– what could be their cause?
– what is their scope?
– what is their probable evolution?
– what are the consequences for the structure?
– can the damage be repaired (technically and financially)?
To answer this question, the following methodology is usually applied:
– the first step involves a detailed visual assessment. This should be carried out by an expert civil engineer. It is similar to a health check without thorough analysis;
– the second step consists of a diagnosis by auscultation of the structure. This is managed by a civil engineer who relies on a specialized (and possibly multidisciplinary) laboratory.
For bridges, the Centre of Research and Expertise for Risks, Environment and Transport (CEREMA) formalized this principle and set up a methodology for monitoring and diagnosing this type of structure, which is summarized hereafter.
The management of structures is based on:
–
Recording of bridges:
this is a preliminary phase that consists of recognizing and recording the various heritage structures. The necessary data are: the type of structure, its
exact location
, its
main dimensional characteristics
and its
use
. The information should be verified in the field in order to take information into account that may not be included in the files;
–
The project file:
this is a document that gathers all the features of the structure along with its history. The contents of the file are defined in the Technical Instructions (ITSEOA);
–
Monitoring of structures:
this is of siginificant importance for maintaining the heritage and safety of users. It consists of following the evolution of various structures from a reference state (initial detailed inspection (IDI)), which is defined at the end of the construction or in the management takeover. The reference state can be modified by carrying out significant works such as expansion and extension. This monitoring is carried out over two levels:
-
periodic inspections
;
-
periodic detailed inspections
.
NOTE.– There is also a detailed end-of-warranty inspection to ensure the condition of a structure under contractual guarantee or 10-year liability.
Table 1.1.Periodic inspections table
Aim
Frequency
Requirements
Achievement
It applies to all structures if they are not carried out in the same year as another inspection (periodic or exceptional detailed inspection).
From 1 year (annual check) to 3 years (assessment visit) maximum.
– Detect any change in the pathologies that had already been noticed.
– Take note of serious damages that pose a threat to users.
– Identify the nature of routine or specialized maintenance.
Visual inspection without special access by trained agents.
Table 1.2.Periodic detailed inspections table
Aim
Frequency
Requirements
Achievement
Establish a health check of the structure and define the actions related to routine or specialized maintenance.
