94,99 €
With the evolution of semiconductor technology and global diversification of the semiconductor business, testing of semiconductor devices to systems for electrostatic discharge (ESD) and electrical overstress (EOS) has increased in importance.
ESD Testing: From Components to Systems updates the reader in the new tests, test models, and techniques in the characterization of semiconductor components for ESD, EOS, and latchup.
Key features:
ESD Testing: From Components to Systems is part of the authors’ series of books on electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection; this book will be an invaluable reference for the professional semiconductor chip and system-level ESD and EOS test engineer. Semiconductor device and process development, circuit designers, quality, reliability and failure analysis engineers will also find it an essential reference. In addition, its academic treatment will appeal to both senior and graduate students with interests in semiconductor process, device physics, semiconductor testing and experimental work.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 425
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2016
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
About the Author
Preface
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Testing for ESD, EMI, EOS, EMC, and Latchup
1.2 Component and System Level Testing
1.3 Qualification Testing
1.4 ESD Standards
1.5 Component Level Standards
1.6 System Level Standards
1.7 Factory and Material Standards
1.8 Characterization Testing
1.9 ESD Library Characterization and Qualification
1.10 ESD Component Standards and Chip Architectures
1.11 System Level Characterization
1.12 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 2: Human Body Model
2.1 History
2.2 Scope
2.3 Purpose
2.4 Pulse Waveform
2.5 Equivalent Circuit
2.6 Test Equipment
2.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
2.8 Failure Mechanisms
2.9 HBM ESD Current Paths
2.10 HBM ESD Protection Circuit Solutions
2.11 Alternate Test Methods
2.12 HBM Two-Pin Stress
2.13 HBM Small Step Stress
2.14 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 3: Machine Model
3.1 History
3.2 Scope
3.3 Purpose
3.4 Pulse Waveform
3.5 Equivalent Circuit
3.6 Test Equipment
3.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
3.8 Failure Mechanisms
3.9 MM ESD Current Paths
3.10 MM ESD Protection Circuit Solutions
3.11 Alternate Test Methods
3.12 Machine Model to Human Body Model Ratio
3.13 Machine Model Status as an ESD Standard
3.14 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 4: Charged Device Model (CDM)
4.1 History
4.2 Scope
4.3 Purpose
4.4 Pulse Waveform
4.5 Equivalent Circuit
4.6 Test Equipment
4.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
4.8 Failure Mechanisms
4.9 CDM ESD Current Paths
4.10 CDM ESD Protection Circuit Solutions
4.11 Alternative Test Methods
4.12 Charged Board Model (CBM)
4.13 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 5: Transmission Line Pulse (TLP) Testing
5.1 History
5.2 Scope
5.3 Purpose
5.4 Pulse Waveform
5.5 Equivalent Circuit
5.6 Test Equipment
5.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
5.8 TLP Pulsed
I–V
Characteristic
5.9 Alternate Methods
5.10 TLP-to-HBM Ratio
5.11 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 6: Very Fast Transmission Line Pulse (VF-TLP) Testing
6.1 History
6.2 Scope
6.3 Purpose
6.4 Pulse Waveform
6.5 Equivalent Circuit
6.6 Test Equipment Configuration
6.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
6.8 VF-TLP Pulsed
I–V
Characteristics
6.9 Alternate Test Methods
6.10 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 7: IEC 61000-4-2
7.1 History
7.2 Scope
7.3 Purpose
7.4 Pulse Waveform
7.5 Equivalent Circuit
7.6 Test Equipment
7.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
7.8 Failure Mechanisms
7.9 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD Current Paths
7.10 ESD Protection Circuitry Solutions
7.11 Alternative Test Methods
7.12 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 8: Human Metal Model (HMM)
8.1 History
8.2 Scope
8.3 Purpose
8.4 Pulse Waveform
8.5 Equivalent Circuit
8.6 Test Equipment
8.7 Test Configuration
8.8 Test Sequence and Procedure
8.9 Failure Mechanisms
8.10 ESD Current Paths
8.11 ESD Protection Circuit Solutions
8.12 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 9: IEC 61000-4-5
9.1 History
9.2 Scope
9.3 Purpose
9.4 Pulse Waveform
9.5 Equivalent Circuit
9.6 Test Equipment
9.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
9.8 Failure Mechanisms
9.9 IEC 61000-4-5 ESD Current Paths
9.10 ESD Protection Circuit Solutions
9.11 Alternate Test Methods
9.12 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 10: Cable Discharge Event (CDE)
10.1 History
10.2 Scope
10.3 Purpose
10.4 Cable Discharge Event – Charging, Discharging, and Pulse Waveform
10.5 Equivalent Circuit
10.6 Test Equipment
10.7 Test Measurement
10.8 Test Procedure
10.9 Measurement of a Cable in Different Conditions
10.10 Transient Field Measurements
10.11 Telecommunication Cable Discharge Test System
10.12 Cable Discharge Current Paths
10.13 Failure Mechanisms
10.14 Cable Discharge Event (CDE) Protection
10.15 Alternative Test Methods
10.16 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 11: Latchup
11.1 History
11.2 Purpose
11.3 Scope
11.4 Pulse Waveform
11.5 Equivalent Circuit
11.6 Test Equipment
11.7 Test Sequence and Procedure
11.8 Failure Mechanisms
11.9 Latchup Current Paths
11.10 Latchup Protection Solutions
11.11 Alternate Test Methods
11.12 Single Event Latchup (SEL) Test Methods
11.13 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 12: Electrical Overstress (EOS)
12.1 History
12.2 Scope
12.3 Purpose
12.4 Pulse Waveform
12.5 Equivalent Circuit
12.6 Test Equipment
12.7 Test Procedure and Sequence
12.8 Failure Mechanisms
12.9 Electrical Overstress (EOS) Protection Circuit Solutions
12.10 Electrical Overstress (EOS) Testing – TLP Method and EOS
12.11 Electrical Overstress (EOS) Testing – DC and Transient Latchup Testing
12.12 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Chapter 13: Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
13.1 History
13.2 Purpose
13.3 Scope
13.4 Pulse Waveform
13.5 Equivalent Circuit
13.6 Test Equipment
13.7 Test Procedures
13.8 Failure Mechanisms
13.9 ESD/EMC Current Paths
13.10 EMC Solutions
13.11 Alternative Test Methods
13.12 EMC/ESD Product Evaluation – IC Prequalification
13.13 EMC/ESD Scanning Detection – Upset Evaluation
13.14 EMC/ESD Product Qualification Process
13.15 Alternative ESD/EMC Scanning Methods
13.16 Current Reconstruction Methodology
13.17 Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Design EMC Solutions
13.18 Summary and Closing Comments
Problems
References
Appendix A: Glossary of Terms
Appendix A: Standards
B.1 ESD Association
B.2 International Organization of Standards
B.3 IEC
B.4 RTCA
B.5 Department of Defense
B.6 Military Standards
B.7 Airborne Standards and Lightning
Index
End User License Agreement
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxiii
xxiv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
Cover
Table of Contents
Preface
Begin Reading
Chapter 1: Introduction
Figure 1.1 ESD, EMI, EOS, and EMC
Figure 1.2 Component tests
Figure 1.3 System level tests
Figure 1.4 Qualification testing
Figure 1.5 Repeatability and Reproducibility
Figure 1.6 SP to STM Process
Figure 1.7 Mandel
k
-statistics plot
Figure 1.8 Mandel
h
-statistics plot
Figure 1.9 Factory and material standards
Figure 1.10 Semiconductor chip level characterization
Figure 1.11 Failure mechanisms, standards, and chip architecture
Figure 1.12 System level characterization
Chapter 2: Human Body Model
Figure 2.1 Human body model (HBM) pulse waveform
Figure 2.2 Human body model (HBM) equivalent circuit model
Figure 2.3 Human body model (HBM) equivalent circuit model with parasitics
Figure 2.4 Human body model (HBM) source
Figure 2.5 (a) Human body model (HBM) commercial test system – Hanwa S5000R. (b) Human body model (HBM) commercial test system – Hanwa HED-N5000
Figure 2.6 Human body model (HBM) wafer level commercial test system
Figure 2.7 Human body model (HBM) test sequence
Figure 2.8 Human body model (HBM) incremental step stress test sequence
Figure 2.9 Human body model (HBM) failure mechanism – diode failure
Figure 2.10 Human body model (HBM) failure mechanism – MOSFET failure
Figure 2.11 Human body model (HBM) failure mechanism – series cascode MOSFET failure
Figure 2.12 Human body model (HBM) ESD event current paths – signal pin to power (
V
DD
)
Figure 2.13 HBM ESD event current paths – signal pin to ground (
V
SS
)
Figure 2.14 HBM ESD event current paths – power rail (
V
DD
) to power (
V
SS
)
Figure 2.15 HBM ESD event current paths – signal pin to signal pin within a common power domain
Figure 2.16 HBM ESD event current paths – signal pin to alternate ground rail domain to domain
Figure 2.17 HBM signal pin ESD protection circuits – dual diode
Figure 2.18 HBM signal pin ESD protection circuit – grounded gate NMOS (GGNMOS)
Figure 2.19 HBM ESD protection circuits – silicon controlled rectifier
Figure 2.20 HBM ESD protection device – power rail to power rail protection
Figure 2.21 Human body model (HBM) ESD protection circuits – ground-to-ground network
Figure 2.22 Alternate test methods
Figure 2.23 HBM split fixture testing
Figure 2.24 HBM sample testing
Figure 2.25 Human body model (HBM) wafer level test equipment
Figure 2.26 Human body model Two-Pin test system (Reproduced with permission of the Hanwa Corporation)
Figure 2.27 HBM two-pin stress test equipment – Grund Technical Solutions Arcus HBM wafer and device test system
Chapter 3: Machine Model
Figure 3.1 MM pulse waveform
Figure 3.2 MM and HBM waveform comparison
Figure 3.3 MM equivalent circuit model
Figure 3.4 MM equivalent circuit model with parasitics
Figure 3.5 MM source
Figure 3.6 (a) MM commercial test system. (b) MM commercial test system – MK1 Thermo-KeyTek (Reproduced with permission of Thermo Fisher Scientific)
Figure 3.7 MM test sequence
Figure 3.8 MM incremental step stress test sequence
Figure 3.9 MM ESD failure mechanisms
Figure 3.10 MM ESD event current paths – signal pin to power (
V
DD
)
Figure 3.11 MM ESD event current paths – signal pin to ground power (
V
SS
)
Figure 3.12 MM ESD event – power rail (
V
DD
) to ground power rail (
V
SS
)
Figure 3.13 MM ESD event – power ground (
V
SS
) to ground power rail (
V
SS
)
Figure 3.14 MM ESD protection circuits – dual diode
Figure 3.15 MM ESD protection circuits – grounded gate NMOS (GGNMOS)
Figure 3.16 MM ESD protection circuits – bidirectional silicon controlled rectifier (SCR)
Figure 3.17 MM ESD protection circuits –
V
DD
to
V
SS
power rail RC-triggered power clamp network and return diode
Figure 3.18 MM ESD protection circuits –
V
SS
-to-
V
SS
rail-to-rail network
Figure 3.19 Small charge model (SCM) equivalent circuit (Reproduced with permission of Hanwa Corporation)
Figure 3.20 Small charge model (SCM) source (Reproduced with permission of Hanwa Corporation)
Figure 3.21 Small charge model (SCM) commercial tester
Figure 3.22 HBM to MM ratio
Figure 3.23 HBM to MM ratio versus HBM voltage
Chapter 4: Charged Device Model (CDM)
Figure 4.1 Charged device models – CDM, SDM, and CBM
Figure 4.2 Charged device model pulse waveform
Figure 4.3 Charged device model (CDM) and HBM waveform comparison
Figure 4.4 (a) Charged Device Model equivalent circuit. (b) Charged Device Model equivalent circuit with parasitics associated with the chassis
Figure 4.5 Charged device model tester
Figure 4.6 (a) Charged device model (CDM) commercial test system Hanwa HED-C5000. (b) Charged device model (CDM) commercial test system Hanwa HED-C5000R (Reproduced with permission of the Hanwa Corporation)
Figure 4.7 Charged device model (CDM) commercial test system – Thermo KeyTek Orion2
Figure 4.8 Charged device model (CDM) test sequence
Figure 4.9 Charged device model (CDM)-induced failure mechanism – receiver gate failure
Figure 4.10 Charged device model (CDM)-induced failure mechanism – interconnects
Figure 4.11 Charged device model (CDM) ESD event current path – charged
V
SS
positive polarity and grounded receiver pin
Figure 4.12 CDM ESD current paths – charged
V
DD
positive polarity and grounded receiver pin
Figure 4.13 Charged device model (CDM) ESD protection circuits – dual-diode–resistor–dual-diode network
Figure 4.14 Charged device model (CDM) ESD protection circuits – dual-diode–resistor–grounded gate NMOS
Figure 4.15 Charged device model (CDM) failure mechanisms in silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology
Figure 4.16 Charged board model
Figure 4.17 FICDM and field-induced charged board model (FICBM) waveform comparison
Figure 4.18 Equivalent circuit schematic with FICDM and FICBM capacitive elements
Figure 4.19 Field-induced charged board model (FICBM) testing of populated printed circuit board
Figure 4.20 (a) CBM failure of an ESD diode. (b) CBM failure of an ESD diode. (c) CBM failure of interconnects
Chapter 5: Transmission Line Pulse (TLP) Testing
Figure 5.1 Pulse testing
Figure 5.2 Transmission line pulse (TLP) waveform
Figure 5.3 Transmission line pulse waveform (expansion)
Figure 5.4 Transmission line pulse (TLP) equivalent circuit
Figure 5.5 Transmission line pulse (TLP) current source configuration
Figure 5.8 Transmission line pulse (TLP) time domain reflection transmission (TDRT) configuration
Figure 5.6 Transmission line pulse (TLP) time domain reflectometry (TDR) configuration
Figure 5.7 Transmission line pulse (TLP) time domain transmission (TDT) configuration
Figure 5.9 (a) Transmission line pulse (TLP) commercial test equipment – Barth system
Figure 5.10 Transmission line pulse (TLP) commercial test equipment – Thermo KeyTek Bench Top Celestron™ Flexible Bench Top TLP/VF-TLP System
Figure 5.11 TLP test procedure and sequence
Figure 5.12 TLP measurement window and the current overshoot
Figure 5.13 TLP analysis – TDR voltage waveform
Figure 5.14 TLP analysis – TDR current waveform
Figure 5.15 TLP analysis – TDR results for current and voltage
Figure 5.16 Construction of transmission line pulse (TLP)
I–V
characteristic
Figure 5.17 Power versus time plot
Figure 5.18 Test sequence for Wunsch–Bell curve construction
Figure 5.19 Wunsch–Bell curves: power-to-failure versus pulse width
Figure 5.20 Long-pulse TLP waveform
Figure 5.21 Wunsch–Bell curve highlighting long duration TLP time domain
Figure 5.22 Transmission line pulse (TLP) and HBM pulse waveform comparison
Chapter 6: Very Fast Transmission Line Pulse (VF-TLP) Testing
Figure 6.1 Very fast TLP testing overview
Figure 6.2 Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) pulse waveform
Figure 6.3 Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) and TLP waveform comparison
Figure 6.4 Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) equivalent circuit
Figure 6.5 Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) TDR configuration
Figure 6.6 Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) time domain transmission (TDT) configuration
Figure 6.7 Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) time domain transmission (TDRT) configuration
Figure 6.8 (a) Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) test system with matching network. (b) Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) test system (Whalen and Domingos)
Figure 6.9 (a) Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) commercial test equipment – Barth Model 4012 VF-TLP+™
Figure 6.10 VF-TLP test sequence
Figure 6.11 VF-TLP measurement window
Figure 6.12 VF-TLP analysis – TDR voltage waveform
Figure 6.13 VF-TLP analysis – TDR current waveform
Figure 6.14 Very fast transmission line pulse (TLP)
I–V
characteristic analysis construction
Figure 6.15 Very fast transmission line pulse (TLP)
I–V
characteristic analysis construction
Figure 6.16 Power versus time plot
Figure 6.17 Wunsch–Bell curves: power-to-failure versus pulse width
Figure 6.18 Wunsch–Bell curve with VF-TLP and TLP result
Figure 6.19 (a) Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) test system. (b) Very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) test system for RF parameter analysis with matching network
Figure 6.20 Ultrafast transmission line pulse (UF-TLP) test system
Figure 6.21 Ultrafast transmission line pulse (UF-TLP) pulse waveform
Figure 6.22 Ultrafast transmission line pulse (UF-TLP) results for a tunneling magnetoresistor (TMR) structure
Chapter 7: IEC 61000-4-2
Figure 7.1 IEC 61000-4-2
Figure 7.2 IEC 61000-4-2 pulse waveform
Figure 7.3 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD gun equivalent circuit (Reproduced with permission of Thermo Fisher Scientific)
Figure 7.4 (a) IEC 61000-4-2 commercial test equipment – ESD gun. (b) IEC 61000-4-2 MiniZap ESD simulator – Thermo KeyTek
Figure 7.5 IEC 61000-4-2 test equipment – table configuration
Figure 7.6 IEC 61000-4-2 versus HBM waveform comparison
Figure 7.7 IEC 61000-4-2 test procedure
Figure 7.8 IEC 61000-4-2 induced failure mechanism
Figure 7.9 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD event current paths –
V
SS
positive polarity
Figure 7.10 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD event current paths
Figure 7.11 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD protection power clamp
Figure 7.12 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD protection circuits
Figure 7.13 IEC 61000-4-2 ESD event – power grid definition
Chapter 8: Human Metal Model (HMM)
Figure 8.1 Human metal model (HMM) testing overview
Figure 8.2 Human metal model (HMM) pulse waveform
Figure 8.3 Human metal model (HMM) ESD gun equivalent circuit
Figure 8.4 Commercial HMM test system – Barth 4702 HMM+™
Figure 8.5 (a) Human metal model (HMM) – horizontal test configuration. (b) Human metal model (HMM) test equipment – vertical table test configuration
Figure 8.6 Schematic layout of IEC 50 Ω coaxial source test fixture board
Figure 8.7 Layout of IEC 50 Ω coaxial source test fixture board showing ground connections
Figure 8.8 (a) HMM with powered board. (b) Human metal model (HMM) source test fixture board (Reproduced with permission from Grund Technical Solutions)
Figure 8.9 Human metal model (HMM) test sequence
Figure 8.10 Human metal model (HMM) current waveform verification – physical arrangements
Figure 8.11 Simultaneous measurement of current probe IEC and the Fischer Custom Communication current probe F-65A
Figure 8.12 Human metal model (HMM) current probe waveform comparison
Figure 8.13 HMM ESD event current paths –
V
SS
positive polarity
Figure 8.14 Human metal model (HMM) ESD protection solution – dedicated
V
DD
and
V
SS
power bus
Figure 8.15 Human metal model (HMM) ESD event – power grid definition
Chapter 9: IEC 61000-4-5
Figure 9.1 IEC 61000-4-5
Figure 9.2 IEC 61000-4-5 surge test pulse open-circuit waveform
Figure 9.3 IEC 61000-4-5 surge test pulse short-circuit waveform
Figure 9.4 IEC 61000-4-5 equivalent circuit of a transient surge generator
Figure 9.5 (a) IEC 61000-4-5 high voltage transient surge commercial test equipment. (b) IEC 61000-4-5 high voltage transient surge commercial test equipment – EMCPro Plus
TM
EMC Test System
Figure 9.6 IEC 61000-4-5 test procedure
Figure 9.7 IEC 61000-4-5 ESD protection circuit
I–V
characteristics
Figure 9.8 IEC 61000-4-5 ESD protection circuit for ground connections
Chapter 10: Cable Discharge Event (CDE)
Figure 10.1 Cable discharge event (CDE)
Figure 10.2 (a) Charging process on Category 5 (CAT 5) cable. (b) Cable discharge event (CDE) discharging process and example test setup. (c) Cable discharge event (CDE) model pulse waveform
Figure 10.3 (a) Cable discharge event (CDE) equivalent circuit model as a lossless transmission line. (b) Cable discharge event (CDE) equivalent circuit with parasitics as a lossy transmission line
Figure 10.4 Cable discharge event (CDE) commercial test system – ESDEMC ES631 – LAN cable discharge event (CDE) evaluation system
Figure 10.5 (a) Test equipment. (b) Test equipment target and adapter
Figure 10.6 Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – high-impedance test generator
Figure 10.7 Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – low-impedance test generator
Figure 10.8 (a) Low-impedance transmission line waveform. (b) Capturing system response to reference waveform. (c) Capturing system response – alternate current transducer. (d) Capturing system response – alternate current transducer
Figure 10.9 (a) Constant impedance tapered transmission line. (b) Constant impedance tapered transmission line. (c) Tapered transmission line (Reproduced with permission from Barth Electronics Corp.)
Figure 10.10 (a) ESD current sensor. (b) ESD current sensor. (c) ESD current sensor (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.11 (a) Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – test procedure. (b) Cable discharge test configuration (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.12 Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – holding cable (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.13 (a) Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – taped to vertical wall. (b) Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – taped to vertical wall versus floating cable (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.14 (a) Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – pulse analysis summary. (b) Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – pulse analysis summary – initial peak current. (c) Cable discharge event (CDE) measurement – pulse analysis summary – plateau current (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.15 (a) Transient discharge – discharge current. (b) Transient discharge – magnetic field. (c) Magnetic current loop. (d) Transient discharge – electric field. (e) Monopole antenna loops (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.26 Antenna-induced voltage (Reproduced with permission from ESD Association)
Figure 10.17 Telecommunication CDE test system
Figure 10.18 Telecommunication CDE test system
Figure 10.19 Cable discharge-induced latchup
Figure 10.20 Cable discharge event (CDE) system level solutions
Figure 10.21 Cable discharge event (CDE) validation test system
Chapter 11: Latchup
Figure 11.1 Latchup testing evolution
Figure 11.2 Latchup cross section
Figure 11.3 (a) Latchup two transistor representation. (b) Latchup four-stripe PNPN test structure
Figure 11.4 Latchup current–voltage (
I–V
) characteristic
Figure 11.5 Latchup waveform for DC latchup
Figure 11.6 Transient latchup waveform
Figure 11.7 Latchup equivalent circuit model
Figure 11.8 Example wafer level latchup test system
Figure 11.9 Thermo Scientific MK4™ commercial latchup test system
Figure 11.10 (a) Latchup test procedure and test flow. (b) Latchup test procedure – positive I-test. (c) Latchup test procedure – negative I-test
Figure 11.11 (a) Latchup failure mechanism – chip level damage. (b) Latchup failure mechanism – package level damage
Figure 11.12 (a) Internal latchup current paths. (b) External latchup current paths
Figure 11.13 Classes of latchup protection solutions
Figure 11.14 Latchup design layout solutions – internal
Figure 11.15 Latchup design layout solutions – external
Figure 11.16 Latchup circuit design solutions
Figure 11.17 Latchup system level design solutions
Figure 11.18 PICA – TLP test method
Figure 11.19 (a) Photon emissions overlaid on semiconductor chip design. (b) Photon emissions from ESD diode. (c) Photon emission count versus time
Figure 11.20 Photon emission test system
Figure 11.21 (a) Photon emission image. (b) Photon emission image (expanded)
Figure 11.22 Single event latchup (SEL)
Figure 11.23 Testing technique
Chapter 12: Electrical Overstress (EOS)
Figure 12.1 Field failure categories
Figure 12.2 EOS versus ESD waveforms
Figure 12.4 EOS and ESD event time constant hierarchy
Figure 12.5 Test procedure
Figure 12.6 EOS failure mechanisms
Figure 12.7 EOS failure mechanism – wire bond
Figure 12.8 EOS failure mechanism – packaging
Figure 12.9 EOS failure mechanism – bond pads
Figure 12.10 (a) Electrical overvoltage (EOV) protection classification. (b) Electrical overvoltage (EOV) protection network
Figure 12.11 Electrical overcurrent (EOC) protection
Figure 12.12 (a) EOS protection – Schottky diode. (b) EOS protection – Zener diode. (c) EOS protection – operational amplifier with Schottky and Zener protection
Figure 12.13 (a) EOS protection – metal oxide varistor (MOV). (b) EOS protection – metal oxide varistor (MOV) for power supply
Figure 12.14 (a) EOS protection – gas discharge tube (GDT). (b) EOS protection – gas discharge tube (GDT)
I–t
plot
Figure 12.15 EOS protection – thermal circuit breakers
Figure 12.16 EOS protection – soft start EOC and EOV protection circuitry
Figure 12.17 Wunsch–Bell power to failure plot
Figure 12.18 Slow and fast EOS domain in the Wunsch–Bell curve
Chapter 13: Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)
Figure 13.1 Electromagnetic compatibility issues
Figure 13.2 Electromagnetic compatibility pulse waveforms
Figure 13.3 Commercial EMC test system – EMCPro Plus™ EMC (Reproduced by permission of Thermo Scientific Fisher)
Figure 13.4 (a) EMC/ESD high-level diagram
Figure 13.5 EMC/ESD scanning system – large system
Figure 13.6 ESD/EMC scanning test procedure
Figure 13.7 EMC current paths – the return current
Figure 13.8 Scanning methodologies
Figure 13.9 Susceptibility and vulnerability
Figure 13.10 ESD/EMC scanning stimulus
Figure 13.11 ESD/EMC qualification process
Figure 13.12 ESD/EMC comparison of reproducibility
Figure 13.13 (a) ESD/EMC failure threshold mapping
Figure 13.14 (a) ESD immunity IC level. (b) ESD immunity IC pin response. (c) ESD immunity IC pin failure levels. (d) ESD/EMC image comparison (vendors A and B)
Figure 13.15 ESD immunity at ATE stage
Figure 13.16 Motherboard image scan
Figure 13.17 EOS and residual current
Figure 13.18 Printed circuit board trace electromagnetic emissions
Figure 13.19 Current reconstruction – test procedure and sequence
Figure 13.20 Printed circuit board emissions
Figure 13.21 Printed circuit board emissions
Figure 13.22 Printed circuit board design
Chapter 7: IEC 61000-4-2
Table 7.1 Alternative standards and associated discharge modules
Chapter 9: IEC 61000-4-5
Table 9.1 IEC 61000-4-5 class and voltage levels
Chapter 12: Electrical Overstress (EOS)
Table 12.1 Field failure categories and percentage
ESD Series
ESD: Circuits and Devices, 2nd Edition
June 2015
ESD: Analog Circuits and Design
October 2014
Electrical Overstress (EOS): Devices, Circuits and Systems
October 2013
ESD Basics: From Semiconductor Manufacturing to Product Use
September 2012
ESD: Design and Synthesis
March 2011
ESD: Failure Mechanisms and Models
July 2009
Latchup
December 2007
ESD: RF Technology and Circuits
September 2006
ESD: Circuits and Devices
November 2005
ESD Physics and Devices
September 2004
Steven H. Voldman
IEEE Fellow, New York, USA
This edition first published 2017
© 2017 Wiley
Registered office
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Voldman, Steven H., author.
Title: ESD testing : from components to systems / Steven H. Voldman.
Other titles: Electrostatic discharge testing | ESD series.
Description: Chichester, UK ; Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, 2016. | Series: ESD series | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016023736 (print) | LCCN 2016033086 (ebook) | ISBN 9780470511916 (cloth) | ISBN 9781118707142 (pdf) | ISBN 9781118707159 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Electronic circuits-Effect of radiation on. | Electronic apparatus and appliances-Testing. | Electric discharges--Detection. | Electric discharges-Measurement. | Electrostatics.
Classification: LCC TK7870.285 .V65 2016 (print) | LCC TK7870.285 (ebook) | DDC 621.3815/4-dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016023736
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
To My ParentsCarl and Blossom Voldman
Dr Steven H. Voldman is the first IEEE Fellow in the field of electrostatic discharge (ESD) for “Contributions in ESD protection in CMOS, Silicon on Insulator and Silicon Germanium Technology.” He received his BS in Engineering Science from the University of Buffalo (1979); a first MS EE (1981) from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); a second degree EE Degree (Engineer Degree) from MIT; an MS Engineering Physics (1986); and a PhD in electrical engineering (EE) (1991) from University of Vermont under IBM's Resident Study Fellow program.
Voldman was a member of the semiconductor development of IBM for 25 years. He was a member of the IBM's Bipolar SRAM, CMOS DRAM, CMOS logic, Silicon on Insulator (SOI), 3D memory team, BiCMOS and Silicon Germanium, RF CMOS, RF SOI, smart power technology development, and image processing technology teams. In 2007, Voldman joined the Qimonda Corporation as a member of the DRAM development team, working on 70, 58, 48, and 32 nm CMOS DRAM technology. In 2008, Voldman worked as a full-time ESD consultant for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC) supporting ESD and latchup development for 45 nm CMOS technology and a member of the TSMC Standard Cell Development team in Hsinchu, Taiwan. In 2009–2011, Steve became a Senior Principal Engineer working for the Intersil Corporation working on analog, power, and RF applications in RF CMOS, RF Silicon Germanium, and SOI. In 2013–2014, Dr Voldman was a consultant for the Samsung Electronics Corporation in Dongtan, South Korea.
Dr Voldman was chairman of the SEMATECH ESD Working Group from 1995 to 2000. In his SEMATECH Working Group, the effort focused on ESD technology benchmarking, the first transmission line pulse (TLP) standard development team, strategic planning, and JEDEC-ESD Association standards harmonization of the human body model (HBM) Standard. From 2000 to 2013, as Chairman of the ESD Association Work Group on TLP and very-fast TLP (VF-TLP), his team was responsible for initiating the first standard practice and standards for TLP and VF-TLP. Steven Voldman has been a member of the ESD Association Board of Directors and Education Committee. He initiated the “ESD on Campus” program that was established to bring ESD lectures and interaction to university faculty and students internationally; the ESD on Campus program has reached over 40 universities in the United States, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Senegal, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, India, and China. Dr Voldman teaches short courses and tutorials on ESD, latchup, patenting, and invention.
He is a recipient of 258 issued US patents and has written over 150 technical papers in the area of ESD and CMOS latchup. Since 2007, he has served as an expert witness in patent litigation and has also founded a limited liability corporation (LLC) consulting business supporting patents, patent writing, and patent litigation. In his LLC, Voldman served as an expert witness for cases on DRAM development, semiconductor development, integrated circuits, and ESD. He is presently writing patents for law firms. Steven Voldman provides tutorials and lectures on inventions, innovations, and patents in Malaysia, Sri Lanka, and the United States.
Dr Voldman also has written an article for Scientific American and is an author of the first book series on ESD, latchup, and EOS (nine books): ESD: Physics and Devices; ESD: Circuits and Devices; ESD: RF Technology and Circuits; Latchup; ESD: Failure Mechanisms and Models; ESD: Design and Synthesis; ESD Basics: From Semiconductor Manufacturing to Product Use; Electrical Overstress (EOS): Devices, Circuits and Systems; and ESD: Analog Circuits and Design, as well as a contributor to the book Silicon Germanium: Technology, Modeling, and Design and a chapter contributor to Nanoelectronics: Nanowires, Molecular Electronics, and Nanodevices. In addition, the International Chinese editions of book ESD: Circuits and Devices; ESD: RF Technology and Circuits; ESD: Design and Synthesis; and ESD Basics: From Semiconductor Manufacturing to Product Use are also released.
The book ESD Testing: From Components to Systems was targeted for the semiconductor process and device engineer, the circuit designer, the ESD/latchup test engineer, and the ESD engineer. In this book, a balance is established between the technology and testing.
The first goal of this book is to teach the ESD models used today. There are many ESD test models, and more types are being developed today and in the future.
The second goal is to show recent test systems and test standards. Significant change in both the test methodologies and issues are leading to proposal of new ESD models, introduction of new standards, and an impact on product diversity and product variety.
The third goal is to expose the reader to the growing number of new testing methodologies, concepts, and equipment. In this book, commercial test equipment is shown as an example to demonstrate the “state-of-the-art” of ESD testing. Significant progress has been made in recent years in ESD, EOS, and EMC.
The fourth goal, as previously done in the ESD book series, is to teach testing as an ESD design practice. ESD testing can be used as a design methodology or an ESD tool. ESD testing can lead to understanding of the fundamental practices of ESD design and the ESD design discipline. This practice uses ESD testing for “de-bugging” and diagnosis.
The fifth goal is to provide a book that can view the different test methods independently. Each chapter is independent so that the reader can study or read about a test model independent of the other test models.
The sixth goal is to provide a text where one can compare the interrelationship between one ESD model and another ESD model. In many cases, there is commonality between the test waveform, the test procedure, and even failure mechanisms.
The seventh goal is to provide a text structure similar to a standard or standard test method, but read easier than reading a standard document. The goal was also to reduce the level of details of the standard to simplify the understanding.
The book ESD Testing: From Components to Systems consists of the following:
Chapter 1
introduces the reader to fundamentals and concepts of the electrostatic discharge (ESD) models and issues.
Chapter 2
discusses the human body model (HBM). It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, test procedures, and test systems. In this chapter, both the wafer-level and product-level test methodologies are discussed. This chapter includes HBM failure mechanisms to circuit solutions. Alternative test methodologies such as sampling and split fixture methods are reviewed.
Chapter 3
discusses the machine model (MM). It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, test procedures, and test systems. In this chapter, both the wafer-level and product-level test methodologies are discussed. This chapter includes MM failure mechanisms to circuit solutions. Alternative test methodologies such as the small charge model (SCM) are discussed. In addition, correlation relations of HBM to MM ratio are analyzed and reviewed.
Chapter 4
discusses the charged device model (CDM). It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, CDM test procedures, and CDM test systems. This chapter includes CDM failure mechanisms to circuit solutions to avoid CDM failures. Alternative test methodologies such as the socketed device model (SDM) and charged board model (CBM) are discussed.
Chapter 5
discusses the transmission line pulse (TLP) methodology and its importance in the semiconductor industry and ESD development. It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, TLP pulsed
I–V
characteristics, TLP test procedures, and TLP test system configurations. TLP current source, time domain reflection (TDR), time domain transmission (TDT), and time domain reflection and transmission (TDRT) configurations is explained
Chapter 6
discusses the very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) methodology. It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, VF-TLP pulsed
I–V
characteristics, VF-TLP test procedures, and VF-TLP test system configurations. Alternative test methods such as ultra fast transmission line pulse (UF-TLP) are discussed.
Chapter 7
discusses the system-level method, known as IEC 61000-4-2. It discusses the purpose, scope, IEC 61000-4-2 waveforms, IEC 61000-4-2 table configurations, and requirements. Failure mechanisms and circuit solutions to avoid failures are explained.
Chapter 8
discusses the human metal model (HMM) method. The HMM model has many similarities to the system-level method, known as IEC 61000-4-2. It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, HMM table configurations, and requirements as well as the distinctions and commonality to the IEC 61000-4-2 test method.
Chapter 9
discusses the system-level transient surge method, known as IEC 61000-4-5. It discusses the purpose, scope, IEC 61000-4-5 waveforms, IEC 61000-4-5 table configurations, and requirements. Failure mechanisms and circuit solutions to avoid failures are explained. The distinction from the IEC 61000-4-2 is highlighted.
Chapter 10
discusses the cable discharge event (CDE) method. It discusses the purpose, scope, waveforms, cable configurations, and impact on the pulse event. Examples of cable-induced failures are given, as well as circuit- and system-level solutions to avoid chip and system failures.
Chapter 11
discusses latchup. It addresses latchup testing, characterization, and design. It also addresses latchup test techniques for product-level testing. Technology benchmarking to ground rule development is also briefly discussed.
Chapter 12
discusses electrical overstress (EOS). It focuses on electrical and thermal safe operating area (SOA) and how EOS occurs. It also focuses on how to distinguish latchup from EOS events.
Chapter 13
discusses electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). It addresses ESD and EMC testing and characterization methods. It also serves as a brief introduction to this large subject matter.
Hopefully, the book covers the trends and directions of ESD testing discipline.
Enjoy the text, and enjoy the subject of ESD testing.
B”H Steven H. Voldman IEEE Fellow
I would like to thank the individuals who have helped me learn about experimental work, high current testing, high voltage testing, electrostatic discharge (ESD) testing, electrical overstress (EOS), and standards development. In the area of ESD, EOS, and latchup testing, I would like to thank for all the support received from SEMATECH, the ESD Association, and the JEDEC organizations.
I would like to thank the SEMATECH organization for allowing me to establish the SEMATECH ESD Work Group: this work group initiated the ESD technology benchmarking test structures, the JEDEC-ESD Association collaboration on ESD standard development, alternate test methods, and most important, the initiation of the transmission line pulse (TLP) standard development.
I thank the ESD Association ESD Work Group (WG) standard committees for many years of discussion on standard developments and on human body model (HBM), machine model (MM), charged device model (CDM), cable discharge event (CDE), human metal model (HMM), TLP testing, and very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) testing. I also thank the ESD Association Standards Development Work Group 5.5 TLP testing committee. We were very fortunate to have a highly talented and motivated team to rapidly initiate the TLP and VF-TLP documents for the semiconductor industry; this included for the development of the TLP and VF-TLP standards, which was a significant accomplishment that has influenced the direction of ESD testing. I am thankful to my colleagues Robert Ashton, Jon Barth, David Bennett, Mike Chaine, Horst Gieser, Evan Grund, Leo G. Henry, Mike Hopkins, Hugh Hyatt, Mark Kelly, Tom Meuse, Doug Miller, Scott Ward, Kathy Muhonen, Nathaniel Peachey, Jeff Dunihoo, Keichi Hasegawa, Jin Min, Yoon Huh, and Wei Huang. I am also thankful to Tze Wee Chen of Stanford University for discussions on the ultra-fast transmission line pulse (UF-TLP) testing.
I am grateful to the Oryx Instrument ESD test development team for years of ESD test support and the Thermo Fisher Scientific team of David Bennett, Mike Hopkins, Tom Meuse, Tricia Rakey, and Kim Baltier. My sincere thanks goes to Jon Barth of Barth Electronics for usage of the images of the Barth test equipment for this text; Keichi Hasegawa of Hanwa Electronics for the images of the Hanwa test equipment; Yoon Huh and Jin Min of Amber Precision Instruments for the scanning images and the test equipment; Wei Huang for the images of the ESDEMC test equipment; Jeff Dunnihoo of Pragma Design Inc for the current reconstruction method images; the HPPI corporation for images of its TLP test equipment; and Chris O'Connor of UTI Inc. for transient latchup analysis.
I would like to thank the JEDEC organization's ESD committee.
This work was supported by the institutions that allowed me to teach and lecture at conferences, symposiums, industry, and universities; this gave me the motivation to develop the texts. I would like to thank for the years of support and the opportunity to provide lectures, invited talks, and tutorials at the International Physical and Failure Analysis (IPFA) in Singapore, the Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge (EOS/ESD) Symposium, the International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), and the Taiwan Electrostatic Discharge Conference (T-ESDC), International Conference on Solid State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), and ASICON.
Finally, I am immensely thankful to the ESD Association office for the support in the area of publications, standards developments, and conference activities – Lisa, Christine, and Terry. I also thank the publisher and staff of John Wiley and Sons, for including the text ESD Testing: From Components to Systems as part of the ESD book series.
To my children, Aaron Samuel Voldman and Rachel Pesha Voldman, good luck to both of you in the future.
And Betsy H. Brown, for her support on this text…
And of course, my parents, Carl and Blossom Voldman.
B”H Dr Steven H. Voldman IEEE Fellow
In the electronics industry, testing of components and systems is a part of the process of qualifying and releasing products. Standards are established to provide methodology, process, and guidance to quantify the technology issue [1–14]. Testing is performed to evaluate the sensitivity and susceptibility of products to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic events. These can be categorized into electrostatic discharge (ESD) [1–12], electrical overstress (EOS), electromagnetic interference (EMI), and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) events, and latchup (Figure 1.1) [13]. In the electronic industry, tests and procedures have been established to quantify the influence of these events on components and systems associated with ESD, EOS, EMC, and latchup [15–24].
Figure 1.1 ESD, EMI, EOS, and EMC
In the testing of electronics, different tests and procedures were established that tested components, and other tests for testing of systems. These tests have been established based on the environment that the components and systems experience in processing, assembly, shipping, to product use [1–24].
Figure 1.2 shows examples of component tests that are applied to wafer level, packaged and unpackaged products. Today, it is common to test semiconductor components for the following standards. These include the human body model (HBM) [1], machine model (MM) [2, 3], charged device model (CDM) [4, 5], to transmission line pulse (TLP) [6, 7], and very fast transmission line pulse (VF-TLP) [8, 9]. In the future chapters, these tests are discussed in depth.
Figure 1.2 Component tests
Figure 1.3 shows examples of system level tests that are applied to systems to address the robustness to environments that the systems may experience in product use. For system level tests, it is now common to test for the IEC 61000-4-2 [10], human metal model (HMM) [11], IEC 61000-4-5 [12], and cable discharge events (CDE).
Figure 1.3 System level tests
Many of the tests are used for different purposes. Some electrical tests are established for characterization, whereas other tests have been established for qualification of components or systems. Qualification tests are performed to guarantee or insure quality and reliability in the system, or in the field. Figure 1.4 shows examples of qualification tests that are performed in the electronic industry. These qualification tests include standard practice (SP) documents, to standard test method (STM).
Figure 1.4 Qualification testing
In the development of these qualification processes, different types of documents and processes are established. In standards development, practices and processes are established for the quality, reliability, and release of products to customers.
In the development of these qualification processes, a standard practice is established for testing of components and systems. A standard practice (SP) is a procedure or process that is established for testing. The document for the standard practice is called the standard practice (SP) document. A second practice is to establish an STM. The distinction between the standard practice (SP) and an STM is the STM procedure insures reproducibility and repeatability. In standards development, both standard practices (SP) and STM are established for the quality, reliability, and release of products to customers.
In STM development, repeatability is an important criterion in order to have a process elevate from a standard practice to an STM. It is important to know that if a test is performed, the experimental results are repeatable (Figure 1.5).
Figure 1.5 Repeatability and Reproducibility
In STM development, reproducibility is a second important criterion in order to have a process elevate from a standard practice (SP) to an STM. Reproducibility is key to verify that the experimental results can be reproduced (Figure 1.6).
Figure 1.6 SP to STM Process
In order to determine if a standard practice can be elevated to an STM, reproducibility and repeatability are evaluated in a process known as Round Robin (RR) process. Statistical analysis is initiated to determine the success or failure of reproducibility and repeatability as part of the experimental methodology. RR is an interlaboratory test that can include measurement, analysis or performing an experiment. This process can include a number of independent scientists and independent laboratories. In the case of ESD and EOS testing, different commercial test equipment is used in the process. To assess the measurement system, the statistics of analysis of variance (ANOVA) random effects model is used.
In the RR process, the within-laboratory consistency statistics is known as the k-statistics. The k-statistics is the quotient of the laboratory standard deviation and the mean standard deviation of all the laboratories. These can be visualized using Mandel statistics and Mandel plots. Mandel's k is an indicator of the precision compared to the pooled standard deviation across all groups. Mandel's k plot is represented by a bar graph (Figure 1.7).
Figure 1.7 Mandel k-statistics plot
In the RR process, the between-laboratory consistency statistics is known as the h-statistics. The h-statistics is the ratio of the difference between the laboratory mean and the mean of all the laboratories, and the standard deviation of the means from all the laboratories. These can be visualized using Mandel statistics and Mandel plots. Mandel's statistics are traditionally plotted for interlaboratory study data, grouped by laboratory to give a graphical view of laboratory bias and precision. Mandel's h-plots are bar graphs around a zero axis (Figure 1.8).
Figure 1.8 Mandel h-statistics plot
Today, in the semiconductor industry, components are tested to the HBM, MM, and CDM [1–5]. These tests are traditionally done on packaged components. In these tests, the components are also unpowered. For the qualification of semiconductor components for over 20 years, the HBM, MM, and CDM tests were completed prior to shipping components to a customer or system developer. In addition, latchup qualification was required in the shipping of components since the 1980s time frame [13]. A new test of components includes the HMM test to evaluate the influence of the components on system level tests.
