1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Quickie Classics
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (1884) follows A Square, a meticulous denizen of a plane, whose encounters with Lineland, Spaceland, and the ineffable Pointland expose both the possibilities and the peril of thinking beyond one's dimension. Written in the crisp idiom of Euclidean manuals yet edged with Swiftian satire, the narrative skewers Victorian hierarchies—class, gender, and intellectual dogma—while staging a lucid primer in dimensional analogy. The Illustrated Edition underscores Abbott's didactic architecture, rendering polygons, angles, and shadow-visions with clarity that illuminates the book's logical puzzles and philosophical provocation. Edwin A. Abbott—schoolmaster, theologian, and classicist—served as head of the City of London School, where he championed rigorous yet humane pedagogy. His training in classical rhetoric and biblical criticism sharpened his appetite for allegory and epistemic humility. Flatland distills those commitments, marrying mathematical instruction to a critique of authoritarian certainties, whether scholastic, scientific, or ecclesiastical. This edition suits readers of the history of ideas, mathematics educators, and lovers of speculative fiction alike. The diagrams make its dimensional metaphors immediately graspable, while the satire remains bracingly current. Approach it as a geometry lesson that becomes a moral education in intellectual hospitality. Quickie Classics summarizes timeless works with precision, preserving the author's voice and keeping the prose clear, fast, and readable—distilled, never diluted. Enriched Edition extras: Introduction · Synopsis · Historical Context · Brief Analysis · 4 Reflection Q&As · Editorial Footnotes.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2026
Ähnliche
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions (Summarized Edition)
Table of Contents
Introduction
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions confronts the reader with a disquieting question—how do creatures whose senses, schools, and social laws are calibrated for a two‑dimensional plane find the courage, language, and imagination to recognize dimensions that their culture declares impossible, and what does that struggle reveal about the human tendency to mistake habit for truth, hierarchy for order, and the measurable for the real, especially when authority rewards conformity, punishes curiosity, and wraps metaphysics, mathematics, and morality into a single map of the known world that seems complete until a crack appears and the invisible becomes thinkable.
Published in 1884 by English schoolmaster Edwin A. Abbott, Flatland is a satirical mathematical fantasia that unfolds in a strictly two‑dimensional country where geometry doubles as law and class. Writing in the Victorian era, Abbott channels a period of scientific expansion and social stratification into an allegory that is at once lucid and unsettling. This illustrated edition amplifies the book’s pedagogic and comic energies with diagrams that translate abstraction into sight. The result straddles genres: part social satire, part didactic exploration of dimensionality, and a formative work in the lineage that would later be named science fiction.
Guided by a narrator known as A. Square, the book begins not with cosmic revelation but with the routines of Flatland itself: houses built for polygons, social etiquette measured by angles, and dangers peculiar to life without height. Abbott’s voice blends textbook clarity with dry wit as the Square explains his nation’s customs to a reader assumed to be three‑dimensional. The prose is brisk, diagrammatic, and slyly comic, creating a reading experience that alternates between playful explanation and sharp social observation. Without venturing beyond its initial premise, the opening movement makes the strange intelligible and the familiar newly strange.
At its core, Flatland interrogates the limits of perception and the ways social power shapes what a culture counts as knowledge. Geometry here is not merely a subject but a metaphor for epistemology and politics: angles signify status; the ability to discern shape stands in for education; boundaries of motion become boundaries of thought. Abbott maps prejudice onto plane figures to expose how hierarchy normalizes itself as nature. Yet the book retains an inviting lightness, turning proofs into parables and etiquette into thought experiments, so that readers can feel how a change in perspective unsettles both mathematics and morality.
For contemporary readers, the illustrations are more than ornaments; they act as a second narrative, staging the book’s central lessons in ink and line. Diagrams of polygons, domestic plans, and lines of sight slow the pace at crucial moments, allowing the mind to try on new orientations before the story proceeds. The images sharpen the satire—measuring vanity, caution, and fear in degrees—and they also reduce abstraction’s friction, making the counterintuitive pleasurable to contemplate. This synergy of prose and picture exemplifies Abbott’s pedagogical instinct: to coax understanding by showing as well as telling, and to make reasoning feel like discovery.
Beyond its period setting, Flatland remains relevant whenever communities debate what counts as evidence, who sets standards of expertise, or how new frameworks displace settled ones. Its fable of dimensional awakening speaks to scientific revolutions, educational reform, and the stubbornness of institutional habit. The satire of rank and respectability retains bite wherever status masquerades as merit. Readers interested in mathematics, the philosophy of science, design, or visualization will find in these pages a model of how to render the abstract graspable without draining it of wonder, and a reminder that intellectual humility is a civic as well as a scholarly virtue.
Approached on its own terms, this compact narrative offers both delight and discipline: a tale that entertains as it instructs, and an argument that teaches by surprising. You will meet a society plotted with compass and rule, hear a citizen justify the ordinary with calm precision, and sense, at the edges of the map, pressures that ask the mind to stretch. Without anticipating its turns, it is fair to say that the book rewards attentiveness and rereading. When you close it, you may find that rooms, streets, and diagrams look slightly altered, as if space itself had learned a new verb.
Synopsis
Edwin A. Abbott’s Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions presents a two-dimensional world narrated by a humble Square, who records his experiences as a cautionary memoir. Framed as a pedagogical and satirical exercise, the tale blends simple geometric description with social observation, inviting readers to imagine life constrained to length and breadth without height. The Square introduces basic conditions of existence in Flatland and the logic by which its inhabitants navigate space, status, and safety. The narrative’s didactic voice, supported by clear visual reasoning, prepares the ground for later inquiries into dimensionality while establishing a society whose customs reveal the limits of perception and power.
Flatland’s social order rests on geometry: women are straight lines subject to strict protocols, while men rank by the number and regularity of their sides, from sharp-angled triangles at the bottom to nearly perfect circles in authority. Civic life codifies recognition methods, domestic architecture, and movement to minimize danger and preserve hierarchy. Irregular figures face suspicion, and heredity shapes prospects, with small improvements in symmetry equated with moral worth. Through the Square’s calm exposition, these customs appear logical inside their world, yet their rigidity suggests a critique of class prejudice, standardized education, and rules that mistake appearance for virtue.
The narrator’s account pauses over daily practices that make two-dimensional life plausible. He describes how citizens distinguish one another by angle and voice, how fog and lighting assist sight-recognition, and why houses are built with particular orientations to reduce accidental harm. Public regulations, civic rituals, and the policing of corners reinforce order, while the education of sons in geometry promises incremental social advancement. Wives follow mandated signals meant to render their perilous points visible. Through these details, Abbott builds a self-consistent world whose safety codes and moral laws double as satire, exposing the links between knowledge, conformity, and institutional discipline.
In a pivotal dream, the Square visits Lineland, a one-dimensional realm whose king perceives only points along a line. The Square attempts to explain width, insisting that a second dimension would allow movement and forms inconceivable to the monarch. Despite careful analogies and appeals to reason, communication fails, revealing how entrenched perceptual frameworks limit understanding. The episode functions as a parable about pedagogy and belief: even accurate demonstrations cannot persuade when the listener’s world allows no conceptual space for them. This encounter prepares the Square, and the reader, to confront how higher-dimensional insight might appear absurd from a lower vantage.
Awakened to the possibility of beyond, the Square receives a visit from a being called the Sphere, who claims origin in a space with an additional direction inaccessible to Flatlanders. Through patient demonstrations—showing successive cross-sections, shifting perspectives, and the logic of dimensional analogy—the Sphere gradually expands the Square’s imagination. What seems a moving circle within Flatland becomes evidence of a body passing through from above, suggesting that perception depends on context rather than absolute form. The Square’s bewilderment yields to insight as he is guided to reconceive measurement, motion, and identity, turning geometry into a vehicle for philosophical awakening.
Emboldened by new understanding, the Square presses the analogy further, proposing a direction beyond the Sphere’s realm just as height exceeds length and breadth. His speculative leap provokes debate about authority, orthodoxy, and the boundaries of legitimate knowledge. Returning to his society, he attempts to share what he has learned through examples and reasoned argument, only to meet institutional resistance designed to preserve stability. The narrative becomes a meditation on pedagogy under censorship and on the personal costs of questioning received truths. Without resolving every tension, the Square’s efforts illustrate how discovery collides with fear, habit, and sanctioned doctrine.
Beyond its fable of dimensions, Abbott’s work endures as a double critique: of stratified societies that mistake order for justice, and of intellectual cultures that police the horizon of thinkable ideas. By coupling rigorous spatial reasoning with a narrator whose voice remains earnest and limited, the book invites readers to test how analogies open new concepts and how empathy widens perception. Its continued resonance lies in the questions it raises about education, scientific imagination, and dissent. As a consequence, the tale serves both as an accessible introduction to dimensional thinking and as a durable reflection on the ethics of inquiry.
Historical Context
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions was published in London in 1884 by Seeley & Co., attributed to the pseudonymous "A Square." Its author, Edwin A. Abbott (1838–1926), was an English schoolmaster, Anglican clergyman, and classical scholar who headed the City of London School from 1865 to 1889. Written in the late Victorian period, the book appeared amid vibrant urban, commercial, and educational life centered in London. The original text integrated clear geometric diagrams, a feature retained and elaborated in many illustrated editions. Abbott's dual commitments to pedagogy and theology shaped a work that uses fable-like narrative to explore intellectual habits of his age.
Abbott wrote while British mathematics education was dominated by Euclid’s Elements as a school text. Debates over reform intensified after the Association for the Improvement of Geometrical Teaching formed in 1871, advocating clearer axioms, alternative proofs, and greater emphasis on reasoning rather than rote. Examinations by universities and civil service boards reinforced a culture of standardized proof. As headmaster, Abbott engaged these currents, publishing on grammar and pedagogy and supervising a curriculum balancing classics and mathematics. Flatland’s geometric conventions and didactic tone echo this milieu, using simple shapes and definitions to question how authority, tradition, and schooling shape what students accept as self-evident.
By the 1880s, European mathematics had expanded beyond Euclid. Gauss, Lobachevsky, and Bolyai had developed non-Euclidean geometries earlier in the century, and Bernhard Riemann’s 1854 lecture proposed spaces of variable curvature with any number of dimensions. In Britain, public fascination with a "fourth dimension" grew through scientific and popular writings, including Johann Karl Friedrich Zöllner’s speculations and Charles Howard Hinton’s essays beginning in 1880. Such discussions encouraged visualization techniques and analogies across dimensions. Flatland draws on this climate, using dimensional analogy to make abstract geometry imaginable and to probe limits imposed by habitual three-dimensional intuition.
Victorian Britain wrestled with conflicts between religious authority and emerging scientific methods. After Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) and the controversial Anglican volume Essays and Reviews (1860), debates over biblical interpretation, miracles, and natural law intensified. Abbott identified with liberal Anglican currents sometimes called "Broad Church," writing works that urged historical and critical readings of scripture, such as The Kernel and the Husk (1886) and Philomythus (1891). His emphasis on disciplined inquiry and skepticism toward dogma informs Flatland’s intellectual posture, which treats received truths as provisional and invites readers to test orthodoxy against evidence, reasoning, and experience.
