1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Sachliteratur, Reportagen, Biografien
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Giordano Bruno," Walter Pater masterfully navigates the intricate intersections of philosophy, art, and science during the Renaissance. Pater's prose is both lyrical and incisive, allowing readers to immerse themselves in the vibrant intellectual landscape that Bruno traversed. The book serves as both a biographical account and a cultural commentary, exploring Bruno's radical ideas that challenged the dogmatic structures of his time. Pater's meticulous attention to detail and his aesthetic sensibility illuminate the complexities of Bruno's thought, particularly his theories on infinity and the multitude of worlds, which resonate with the burgeoning spirit of modernity. Walter Pater, a preeminent figure in the Aesthetic Movement, was deeply influenced by the philosophical inquiries of his era, particularly those surrounding humanism and existentialism. His scholarly pursuits at Oxford and his later work as a critic reflected a profound engagement with the nuances of art and intellect. Pater's fascination with the lives of historical figures, especially those who defied convention, fueled his desire to present Bruno not only as a philosopher but as a symbol of intellectual courage and creativity. I recommend "Giordano Bruno" to anyone interested in the profound questions of existence and the power of the human spirit to transcend dogma. This work serves as an essential exploration for scholars, students, and casual readers alike, providing insights into the mind of a thinker whose legacy remains influential. Pater's passionate narrative invites readers to reflect on their own beliefs and the eternal struggle for knowledge. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021
Ähnliche
Giordano Bruno
Table of Contents
Introduction
A fearless mind tests the world’s limits even as the world tests it in return.
Walter Pater’s Giordano Bruno is a biographical-critical essay—an intellectual portrait written in the late nineteenth century by a leading Victorian critic. Rather than a novel or dramatic life, it belongs to the essay tradition, placing Bruno within the ferment of sixteenth-century European thought while reflecting the refined, meditative habits of Pater’s own age. Readers encounter a work that stands among Pater’s Renaissance and philosophical studies, attentive to the interplay between history and temperament. Its perspective is retrospective and interpretive, offering context and atmosphere more than exhaustive chronology, and inviting readers to weigh ideas as living presences in culture.
The essay’s premise is concise: to consider Bruno as a figure whose thought and character illuminate the Renaissance impulse toward boundlessness in nature and mind. Pater traces the philosopher’s movements across European intellectual centers only so far as they clarify the evolution of his ideas. The experience is not that of a scholarly apparatus or technical treatise; it is a measured, reflective study with a patient, musical cadence. Pater’s voice is analytical yet impressionistic, balancing intellectual poise with sensuous precision. The mood is grave and sympathetic, inviting readers to inhabit a climate of thought rather than to follow a plotted narrative.
Central themes emerge with quiet force. Pater presents Bruno as a thinker drawn to the largeness of the universe and the immanence of meaning in the natural order, a temperament for whom philosophy is both speculation and ethos. The essay explores the friction between new conceptions of nature and inherited authorities, not to adjudicate doctrinal disputes, but to gauge the moral and imaginative energy in Bruno’s stance. It considers the costs and exhilarations of intellectual freedom, the cosmopolitan reach of ideas across languages and courts, and the persistence of a personality at once combative and affirmative in its pursuit of coherence.
Pater’s method is that of portraiture: to read doctrine through style and character, and character through the rhythms of prose and argument. He practices a criticism that is historically conscientious without pedantry, attentive to the way concepts feel as well as how they reason. The result is a study that renders complex metaphysical claims in lucid images and careful transitions. Rather than staging a polemic, Pater allows tensions to resonate—between skepticism and faith, empiricism and vision, solitude and public risk. His sentences are crafted to slow the eye, encouraging a contemplative pace that mirrors the deliberation he finds in Bruno’s intellectual courage.
For contemporary readers, the essay’s relevance lies in its questions about how thought moves through culture and how individuals bear the weight of their convictions. It prompts reflection on the relation between science and metaphysics, on pluralism within a shared civic space, and on the responsibilities that accompany dissent. Pater’s Bruno reminds us that ideas are inseparable from the forms of life that carry them, and that the language we choose can clarify or cloud what we mean. The essay offers not a verdict but an atmosphere of inquiry, a space in which curiosity is disciplined by tact, patience, and ethical attention.
Approached this way, Giordano Bruno offers an inviting threshold to both Renaissance intellectual history and Pater’s distinctive criticism. It will appeal to readers who prefer reflective analysis over exhaustive documentation, who enjoy prose attentive to cadence and nuance, and who seek a humane account of how daring imaginations shape, and are shaped by, their times. Pater neither reduces Bruno to a symbol nor dissolves him into abstraction; he composes a living contour of temperament and idea. The reward is an essay that models how to read a life through thought, and thought through the felt texture of a life.
Synopsis
Walter Pater’s Giordano Bruno presents a focused study of the sixteenth-century philosopher as a figure emblematic of the Renaissance mind. Beginning with a concise biographical sketch, the book follows Bruno’s travels and writings to illuminate the development of his ideas. Pater organizes his narrative to move from life to doctrine, and from doctrine to style and influence, allowing readers to see how circumstances, temperament, and reading shaped Bruno’s thought. The tone remains analytic and descriptive. Throughout, Pater identifies the central propositions that animate Bruno’s work, notably the vision of an infinite, living universe, and examines how these propositions were argued in dialogic and poetic forms.
Pater outlines Bruno’s early years in Nola, his birth in 1548, and his entry into the Dominican convent at Naples. The account summarizes Bruno’s exposure to scholastic theology, classical literature, and the Neoplatonic tradition, alongside the tensions produced by his questioning spirit. Early doubts about certain devotional practices and doctrinal points drew attention from ecclesiastical authorities. Pater records the progressive estrangement that led Bruno to cast off the habit and leave the order. This departure, presented without embellishment, sets the pattern for a life spent in movement, as Bruno sought intellectual freedom and audiences receptive to his evolving synthesis of philosophy, science, and imaginative expression.
The narrative follows Bruno’s first migrations: a brief, uneasy stay in Geneva; lectures at Toulouse; and a period in Paris under Henry III’s notice. Pater summarizes Bruno’s demonstration of the arts of memory and the publication of Latin treatises such as De umbris idearum, which established his reputation for inventive method. Bruno then travelled to England, associated with the French embassy, visited Oxford, and encountered opposition from Aristotelian scholars. Pater describes London as the setting for several of the Italian dialogues, noting how Bruno used the city’s intellectual climate as a stage for presenting arguments on cosmology, method, and the habits of learned pedantry.
Pater provides a compact guide to the Italian dialogues, emphasizing their subjects and tone. La Cena de le Ceneri dramatizes disputes with academic orthodoxy while supporting Copernican astronomy. De la Causa, Principio et Uno advances a metaphysics of unity in diversity. De l’Infinito Universo e Mondi argues for an infinite universe populated by innumerable worlds. Spaccio de la Bestia Trionfante is a moral and civic allegory proposing a renewal of virtues. Cabala del Cavallo Pegaseo mixes satire and speculation. De gli Eroici Furori frames intellectual aspiration as heroic love. Pater traces how these works combine argumentative clarity with figurative and rhetorical vigor.
Turning to Bruno’s cosmology, Pater outlines the key claims: the universe has no fixed center or circumference; the stars are suns with their own systems; and nature is boundless in scope and fecundity. Bruno’s critique of the closed Aristotelian cosmos is summarized, as is his endorsement of Copernican heliocentrism for both physical and symbolic reasons. The book registers Bruno’s debt to earlier thinkers such as Nicholas of Cusa and Lucretius, while indicating his distinctive insistence on the living character of matter. Pater’s exposition keeps to essential arguments, showing how Bruno seeks to align observation, logical inference, and imaginative analogy to support a new picture of the world.
Pater then delineates Bruno’s metaphysical and methodological positions. Matter and form are presented as inseparable aspects of a single reality, animated by a universal principle that appears diversely in things. The One and the infinite stand together in Bruno’s account, permitting the coincidence of contraries within an all-embracing unity. Attention is given to Bruno’s monadic vocabulary in his later Latin works, where minimal units, number, and continuity are explored alongside the vastness of space. Pater describes the role of analogy, symbol, and paradox in Bruno’s argumentative style, indicating how these devices carry philosophical content while maintaining an elevated, often poetic, mode of discourse.
Ethical and religious dimensions are treated through Bruno’s allegories and dialogues on love and virtue. Pater summarizes the Spaccio’s program of moral reform, cast as a reordering of constellations and virtues, and the Eroici Furori’s depiction of a disciplined fervor that seeks the infinite through intellectual and affective striving. Bruno’s frequent critiques of superstition and sterile scholasticism are noted, together with his language of immanence, in which divinity is encountered within nature. The account keeps clear the distinction between doctrinal theology and Bruno’s philosophical religion, highlighting how his ethical vision emphasizes courage, sincerity, and an energetic engagement with the ever-living order of things.
The later chapters recount Bruno’s continued movements through Wittenberg, Helmstedt, Prague, and Frankfurt, his publication of the Latin poems and treatises De minimo, De monade, and De immenso, and his eventual return to Italy. Pater narrates the invitation to Venice by Mocenigo, the arrest, transfer to Rome, and prolonged Inquisition proceedings. The summary notes the scarcity and complexity of the records, the recurrent accusations touching on doctrine and method, and Bruno’s persistence in his positions. The account concludes the biographical arc with his execution in 1600, presented factually and briefly, and then turns to an assessment of his character, temperament, and prose style.
In closing, Pater draws together Bruno’s life and writings to present a portrait of the Renaissance intellect at full stretch: speculative, mobile, and animated by a vision of the universe as infinite and alive. The book emphasizes Bruno’s fusion of scientific outlook and poetic expression, the continuity he claimed between mind and nature, and his effort to recast knowledge as a heroic pursuit. Without polemic, Pater indicates Bruno’s lasting significance for modern thought in cosmology, metaphysics, and literary form. The overall message is that Bruno’s example illustrates how expansive ideas, imaginatively expressed, can reshape intellectual horizons and define an epoch’s distinctive energy.
Historical Context
Walter Pater’s Giordano Bruno (1889) examines a sixteenth-century philosopher within the intricate geography of Renaissance and Counter-Reformation Europe from the vantage of late-Victorian Oxford. The work is set, intellectually, in Italy, France, England, and the German states between 1548 and 1600—the years of Bruno’s life—where princely courts, universities, and ecclesiastical tribunals shaped scholarship and dissent. Naples, Paris, London, Wittenberg, and Venice were not merely stops on a thinker’s route but sites of confessional authority and civic power. Writing amid nineteenth-century debates over science, church, and liberty, Pater frames Bruno’s world as one where cosmology, state policy, and religious policing converged, thereby making Renaissance Europe a laboratory of modern intellectual freedom and its risks.
The Counter-Reformation formed the political-religious horizon of Bruno’s career. The Council of Trent (1545–1563) codified doctrine and discipline, while Paul III’s Roman Inquisition (established 1542) and the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (first issued 1559; revised 1564) organized surveillance of belief and books. Italian city-states and monarchies coordinated with ecclesiastical courts to patrol heterodoxy. Pater presents Bruno within this apparatus, tracing how an adventurous cosmology met a juridical culture of censorship. By situating Bruno’s writings against decrees and tribunals, the book mirrors the period’s fusion of theology and statecraft, showing that ideas about infinite worlds, memory, and nature were contested not only in lecture halls but before magistrates empowered to condemn.
Bruno’s itinerant biography charts the collision of scholarship and authority across Europe. Born at Nola near Naples in 1548, he entered the Dominican convent of San Domenico Maggiore (1565), left under suspicion (1576), and moved through Geneva (1579), Toulouse and Paris (1581–1583), London and Oxford (1583–1585), Wittenberg (1586–1588), Helmstedt and Frankfurt (1589–1591), and Venice (1592). In Paris he gained Henry III’s attention for mnemonic arts; in London he wrote Italian dialogues; in German universities he lectured on philosophy. Pater treats this movement as symptomatic of a continent divided by creed and jurisdiction: mobility permitted publication and patronage, yet exposed Bruno to overlapping regimes of orthodoxy that ultimately converged upon him.
The French Wars of Religion (1562–1598) formed a violent backdrop to Bruno’s Paris years. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (24 August 1572) left thousands of Huguenots dead in Paris and the provinces, and the later War of the Three Henrys (1587–1589) culminated in the assassinations of Henry, Duke of Guise (1588), and King Henry III (1589). Stability arrived only when Henry IV issued the Edict of Nantes (1598), granting limited Protestant rights. Pater links Bruno’s Parisian patronage and lectures to this fractured scene: Bruno’s pragmatic search for royal and scholarly audiences navigated a court culture where confessional allegiance shaped intellectual opportunity and the limits of tolerated speculation.
The Copernican revolution provided the cosmological axis of Bruno’s thought. Nicolaus Copernicus published De revolutionibus orbium coelestium in 1543, displacing Earth from the universe’s center. Building on this, Bruno argued for an infinite cosmos populated by innumerable worlds and suns, and for nature as a dynamic, immanent principle. In London he issued La Cena de le Ceneri, De la causa, principio e uno, and De l’infinito, universo e mondi (all 1584), followed by Spaccio de la bestia trionfante and De gli eroici furori (1585). Pater connects these works to the broader scientific ferment, reading Bruno’s extension of heliocentrism as a philosophical challenge to the finite, hierarchized universe defended by church and university.
Bruno’s arrest and trial epitomized Counter-Reformation justice. Invited to Venice by the patrician Giovanni Mocenigo to teach memory, he was seized in May 1592 and, after proceedings before the Venetian Holy Office, extradited to Rome in 1593. Tried by the Roman Inquisition over eight years, he faced charges touching the Trinity, Incarnation, transubstantiation, the plurality of worlds, and the use of “natural magic.” On 8 February 1600 he was condemned as a heretic; on 17 February 1600 he was executed by burning at the Campo de’ Fiori. Pater’s treatment makes this judicial process the crucible of Bruno’s legacy, where metaphysical daring met institutional resolve and crafted the modern image of martyrdom for thought.
England under Elizabeth I provided a contrasting regime of controlled latitude. The Act of Supremacy and Act of Uniformity (both 1559) defined a national church, while the Thirty-Nine Articles (1563) and recusancy fines enforced conformity. Within this framework, Bruno joined the household of the French ambassador Michel de Castelnau (1583–1585), debated at Oxford in 1583, and satirized scholastic Aristotelianism. His dialogues—particularly De gli eroici furori (1585), dedicated to Sir Philip Sidney—addressed English patrons and readers. Pater reads these years as a test case in how a polity balancing Protestant identity and pragmatic tolerance could briefly shelter heterodox speculation, even as universities resisted cosmological and philosophical innovation.
Pater’s book functions as a critique of confessional states and academic pedantry by dramatizing their friction with free inquiry. Through Bruno’s collisions with the Index, inquisitorial courts, and scholastic faculties, it exposes coercive mechanisms that policed belief, narrowed curricula, and criminalized speculation about nature. The essay’s 1889 date matters: that year Rome unveiled Ettore Ferrari’s statue of Bruno (9 June 1889), a liberal, anticlerical monument. Pater’s analysis aligns with such contemporary reassessments, using Renaissance history to question the alliance of dogma and power, to defend cosmological imagination against legal theology, and to press for institutional humility before expanding scientific horizons.
Giordano Bruno
GIORDANO BRUNO, PARIS: 1586.+
WALTER HORATIO PATER
"Jetzo, da ich ausgewachsen, Viel gelesen, viel gereist, Schwillt mein Herz, und ganz von Herzen, Glaub' ich an den Heilgen Geist."—Heine+
[234] IT was on the afternoon of the Feast of Pentecost that news of the death of Charles the Ninth[1] went abroad promptly. To his successor the day became a sweet one, to be noted unmistakably by various pious and other observances; and it was on a Whit-Sunday afternoon that curious Parisians had the opportunity of listening to one who, as if with some intentional new version of the sacred event then commemorated, had a great deal to say concerning the Spirit; above all, of the freedom, the independence of its operation. The speaker, though understood to be a brother of the Order of St. Dominic[2], had not been present at the mass—the usual university mass, De Spiritu Sancto, said to-day according to the natural course of the season in the chapel of the Sorbonne, by the Italian Bishop of Paris. It was the reign of the Italians just then, a doubly refined, somewhat morbid, somewhat ash-coloured, Italy in France, more Italian still. Men of Italian birth, "to the great suspicion of simple people," swarmed in Paris, already "flightier, less constant, than the girouettes on its steeples," and it was love for Italian fashions that had brought king and courtiers here to-day, with great eclat, as they said, frizzed and starched, in the beautiful, minutely considered dress of the moment, pressing the university into a perhaps not unmerited background; for the promised speaker, about whom tongues had been busy, not only in the Latin quarter, had come from Italy. In an age in which all things about which Parisians much cared must be Italian there might be a hearing for Italian philosophy. Courtiers at least would understand Italian, and this speaker was rumoured to possess in perfection all the curious arts of his native language. And of all the kingly qualities of Henry's youth, the single one that had held by him was that gift of eloquence, which he was able also to value in others—inherited perhaps; for in all the contemporary and subsequent historic gossip about his mother, the two things certain are, that the hands credited with so much mysterious ill-doing were fine ones, and that she was an admirable speaker.
Bruno himself tells us, long after he had withdrawn himself from it, that the monastic life promotes the freedom of the intellect by its [235] silence and self-concentration. The prospect of such freedom sufficiently explains why a young man who, however well found in worldly and personal advantages, was conscious above all of great intellectual possessions, and of fastidious spirit also, with a remarkable distaste for the vulgar, should have espoused poverty, chastity, obedience, in a Dominican cloister. What liberty of mind may really come to in such places,[1q] what daring new departures it may suggest to the strictly monastic temper, is exemplified by the dubious and dangerous mysticism of men like John of Parma and Joachim of Flora, reputed author of the new "Everlasting Gospel," strange dreamers, in a world of sanctified rhetoric, of that later dispensation of the spirit, in which all law must have passed away; or again by a recognised tendency in the great rival Order of St. Francis, in the so-called "spiritual" Franciscans, to understand the dogmatic words of faith with a difference.
The three convents in which Bruno lived successively, at Naples, at Citta di Campagna, and finally the Minerva at Rome, developed freely, we may suppose, all the mystic qualities of a genius in which, from the first, a heady southern imagination took the lead. But it was from beyond conventional bounds he would look for the sustenance, the fuel, of an ardour born or bred within them. Amid such artificial religious stillness the air itself becomes generous in undertones. The vain young monk (vain of course!) would feed his vanity by puzzling the good, sleepy heads of the average sons of Dominic with his neology, putting new wine into old bottles, teaching them their own business—the new, higher, truer sense of the most familiar terms, the chapters they read, the hymns they sang, above all, as it happened, every word that referred to the Spirit, the reign of the Spirit, its excellent freedom. He would soon pass beyond the utmost limits of his brethren's sympathy, beyond the largest and freest interpretation those words would bear, to thoughts and words on an altogether different plane, of which the full scope was only to be felt in certain old pagan writers, though approached, perhaps, at first, as having a kind of natural, preparatory kinship with Scripture itself. The Dominicans would seem to have had well-stocked, liberally-selected, libraries; and this curious youth, in that age of restored letters, read eagerly, easily, and very soon came to the kernel of a difficult old author—Plotinus or Plato; to the purpose of thinkers older still, surviving by glimpses only in the books of others—Empedocles, Pythagoras, who had enjoyed the original divine sense of things, above all, Parmenides, that most ancient assertor of God's identity with the world. The affinities, the unity, of the visible and the invisible, of earth and heaven, of all things whatever, with each other, through the consciousness, the person, of God the Spirit, who was at every moment of infinite time, in every atom of matter, at every [236] point of infinite space, ay! was everything in turn: that doctrine—l'antica filosofia Italiana—was in all its vigour there, a hardy growth out of the very heart of nature, interpreting itself to congenial minds with all the fulness of primitive utterance. A big thought! yet suggesting, perhaps, from the first, in still, small, immediately practical, voice, some possible modification of, a freer way of taking, certain moral precepts: say! a primitive morality, congruous with those larger primitive ideas, the larger survey, the earlier, more liberal air.
