0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 2,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 2,49 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
- Sprache: Englisch
In "God the Known and God the Unknown," Samuel Butler embarks on an exploration of the divine, juxtaposing traditional theological perspectives with his own innovative ideas. Employing a blend of philosophical inquiry and literary wit, Butler delves into the complexities of human understanding of God, illuminating the contrasts between the God of established religion and the more personal, ineffable deity. The text is marked by Butler's incisive clarity and skepticism, reflecting the broader intellectual currents of the late 19th century, as he navigates the tension between faith and reason amid an increasingly secularized society. Samuel Butler was a multifaceted thinker, acclaimed not only as a novelist but also as an insightful essayist and critic. His background in both literature and philosophy, combined with his own wrestles with conventional belief systems, provided fertile ground for his reflections on spirituality. Butler's keen observation of contemporary debates surrounding science and religion informs his writings, as he seeks to reconcile the known and unknown aspects of the divine in a manner that challenges prevailing notions. This thought-provoking work is highly recommended for readers interested in theology, philosophy, and literature. Butler's eloquence and critical perspective invite readers to engage in self-reflection about their own beliefs and perceptions of the divine, making it an essential read for those looking to navigate the delicate interplay between faith and reason. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
God the Known and God the Unknown
Table of Contents
Introduction
Samuel Butler’s God the Known and God the Unknown invites readers to separate the divinity we fashion from human needs and experience from the mystery that exceeds our explanations, and to live thoughtfully in the tension between coherence and humility.
This is a work of nonfiction—at once philosophical meditation and cultural critique—by the English writer Samuel Butler, issued after his death in 1902 and belonging to the early twentieth-century moment that followed the Victorian crisis of faith. It arises from a period shaped by debates over science, scripture, and moral authority, and it bears the stamp of a writer who had already challenged prevailing orthodoxies in both fiction and essay. The book’s intellectual setting is the late Victorian and early Edwardian world, where questions about knowledge, belief, and the limits of language were publicly contested.
The premise is disarmingly simple: clarify what we can responsibly call “known” about God in terms of human conduct, institutions, and shared experience, and acknowledge what remains “unknown” because it exceeds verification or utility. Butler uses this division to examine religion without either capitulating to dogma or collapsing into cynicism. The reading experience is one of steady argument rather than narrative, a conversational but stringent inquiry that prefers workable distinctions to metaphysical system-building. The mood is probing and unsentimental, yet attentive to everyday moral life, inviting readers to test ideas against practice rather than against authority alone.
Butler’s voice is plainspoken, ironic, and patient, a style that draws strength from sustained common-sense reasoning. He distrusts grand abstractions unless they can be cashed out in lived consequences, and he frequently approaches large questions through small, telling observations. The prose moves by analogy and counterexample, keeping its philosophical reach tethered to familiar experiences. Readers will notice a craftsman of argument more than a rhetorician of fervor: sentences build carefully, claims are hedged where needed, and conclusions are modestly framed. The result is a lucid, dialogic tone that welcomes disagreement while insisting on clarity about terms and assumptions.
Key themes include the relation between personal conscience and institutional religion, the authority of tradition versus the claims of independent judgment, and the distinction between practical knowledge and metaphysical speculation. Butler is concerned with how habits shape belief, how communities authorize doctrines, and how language both illuminates and obscures what we mean by the divine. He presses on the limits of certainty while defending the moral usefulness of some inherited forms. Throughout, there is a persistent question about how science and historical criticism bear on religious claims, not to dismiss faith, but to ask what it can coherently affirm.
For contemporary readers, the book matters because it models intellectual integrity in a domain often dominated by polemic. It offers a way to think about religion that neither shields itself from evidence nor reduces meaning to bare mechanism. In an age of plural beliefs and contested truths, Butler’s method—start with what can be shared in experience, proceed cautiously beyond it, and remain honest about uncertainty—feels bracing and humane. The work’s calm skepticism pairs with ethical seriousness, suggesting that humility about ultimate matters can coexist with firmness in conduct, and that disagreement need not foreclose cooperation in common life.
Approached as a short, rigorous conversation with a heterodox nineteenth-century mind, God the Known and God the Unknown promises a concentrated encounter with questions that outlast fashions. It is less a map than a compass, teaching readers to orient themselves among claims about the divine by testing what those claims do in human lives. Butler’s emphasis on clarity, modesty, and practical consequence offers a durable framework for inquiry. What emerges is neither a creed nor a demolition, but a disciplined invitation to think, in good faith and without evasion, about what we can know, what we cannot, and how to live between them.
Synopsis
Samuel Butler’s God the Known and God the Unknown examines what people mean by “God,” separating what can be plainly observed and used from what remains beyond precise definition. Writing in a plainspoken, practical tone, Butler approaches theology as an inquiry into how living beings and societies actually behave. He proposes that reliable knowledge arises from experience, habit, and common sense, and he treats grand abstractions with caution. The book sets out to distinguish a God that human communities effectively know—because they act on this idea daily—from a God that lies in the deeper, largely unformulated order of life and nature. This distinction organizes his argument throughout.
Early chapters challenge metaphysical definitions that float free of practice. Butler surveys traditional theological claims and asks what, in them, proves serviceable for guiding life. He emphasizes that human meaning is built from repeated actions, tested customs, and institutions that endure because they work. He resists framing God as an abstract essence and instead investigates how the idea functions in ordinary conduct, law, and memory. By steering attention from speculation to usage, Butler prepares a shift from creed to observable arrangements, focusing on how communities personify shared purposes. This move sets up his distinction between a God we effectively know and a God that remains beyond explicit grasp.
“God the Known,” in Butler’s account, is the composite person that communities fashion when they organize their aims and obligations. Families, churches, guilds, and nations behave like living beings with memories, habits, and wills. To manage these large organisms, people attribute personality to them, treating the collective as a single agent to which loyalty, gratitude, and duty are owed. Butler describes how legal and social fictions—such as the idea of a corporation—model this reality: the many acting as one. In this sense, “God” names the felt presence of the community’s embodied purpose, recognized, served, and reinforced each day through practice and institution.
From here Butler examines religion’s visible machinery: rites, offices, doctrines, and laws that transmit communal memory. He frames worship as the maintenance of a social organism’s health—its continuities, shared stories, and constraints that keep individuals aligned with the whole. Sin and obedience become practical terms describing what harms or helps the community’s life. He notes how authority and tradition stabilize behavior, allowing experience to accumulate. Yet he stresses that institutions must answer to utility and experience, not to isolated speculation. Thus the “known” God is encountered wherever collective order proves effective, giving a concrete measure of what, in religion, can claim actual knowledge.
“God the Unknown” points to the deeper, largely tacit order underlying organisms and their instincts. Butler turns to life’s formative processes—development, growth, and the guidance of behavior that cannot be fully articulated—arguing that much of what directs living beings operates as inherited and unspoken memory. Organisms act purposefully without explicit reasoning, as if informed by a wisdom embedded in structure and habit. This unknown is not a denial of reality but an admission of limits: the sources of form, intention, and concord with environment exceed tidy explanation. The book treats this sphere as the background from which practical knowledge springs, yet which remains only partly expressible.
