94,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
- Kategorie: Wissenschaft und neue Technologien
- Sprache: Englisch
Indoor Wireless Communications: From Theory to Implementation provides an in-depth reference for design engineers, system planners and post graduate students interested in the vastly popular field of indoor wireless communications. It contains wireless applications and services for in-building scenarios and knowledge of key elements in the design and implementation of these systems. Technologies such as Wireless Local Area Networks, Bluetooth, ZigBee, Indoor Optical Communications, WiMAX, UMTS and GSM for indoor environments are fully explained and illustrated with examples. Antennas and propagation issues for in-building scenarios are also discussed, emphasizing models and antenna types specifically developed for indoor communications. An exhaustive survey on indoor wireless communication equipment is also presented, covering all available technologies including antennas, distribution systems, transceivers and base stations.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 700
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2017
Ähnliche
Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication
Preface
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Motivation
1.2 Evolution of Macro to Heterogeneous Networks
1.3 Challenges
1.4 Structure of the Book
References
Chapter 2: Indoor Wireless Technologies
2.1 Cellular
2.2 Wi-Fi
2.3 Bluetooth
2.4 ZigBee
2.5 Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
2.6 Private Mobile Radio (PMR)
2.7 Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications (DECT)
References
Chapter 3: System Requirements
3.1 Environments
3.2 Coverage
3.3 Isolation
3.4 Leakage
3.5 Capacity
3.6 Interference
3.7 Signal Quality
3.8 Technology
3.9 Cost
3.10 Upgradeability
3.11 System Expansion
3.12 Conclusion
References
Chapter 4: Radio Propagation
4.1 Maxwell's Equations
4.2 Plane Waves
4.3 Propagation Mechanisms
4.4 Effects of Materials
4.5 Path Loss
4.6 Fast Fading
4.7 Shadowing (Slow Fading)
4.8 Building Penetration Loss
4.9 Conclusion
References
Chapter 5: Channel Modelling
5.1 The Importance of Channel Modelling
5.2 Propagation Modelling Challenges
5.3 Model Classification
5.4 Model Accuracy
5.5 Empirical Models
5.6 Physical Models
5.7 Hybrid Models
5.8 Outdoor-to-Indoor Models
5.9 Models for Propagation in Radiating Cables
5.10 Wideband Channel Characteristics
5.11 Noise Considerations
5.12 In-Building Planning Tools
5.13 Conclusion
References
Chapter 6: Antennas
6.1 The Basics of Antenna Theory
6.2 Antenna Parameters
6.3 Antenna Types
6.4 Antenna Performance Issues
6.5 Antenna Measurements
6.6 MIMO (Multiple-Input Multiple-Output)
6.7 Examples Of In-Building Antennas
6.8 Radiating Cables
6.9 Conclusion
References
Chapter 7: Radio Measurements
7.1 The Value of Measurements
7.2 Methodology for Indoor Measurements
7.3 Types of Measurement Systems
7.4 Measurement Equipment
7.5 Types of Indoor Measurement Surveys
7.6 Guidelines for Effective Radio Measurements
7.7 Model Tuning and Validation
7.8 Conclusion
References
Chapter 8: Capacity Planning and Dimensioning
8.1 Introduction
8.2 An Overview On Teletraffic
8.3 Capacity Parameters – Circuit-Switched
8.4 Data Transmission Parameters
8.5 Capacity Limits
8.6 Radio Resource Management
8.7 Load Sharing: Base Station Hotels
8.8 Traffic Mapping
8.9 Capacity Calculations
8.10 Wi-Fi Capacity
8.11 Data Offloading Considerations
8.12 Conclusion
References
Chapter 9: RF Equipment and Distribution Systems
9.1 Base Stations
9.2 Distributed Antenna Systems
9.3 RF Miscellaneous – Passive
9.4 RF Miscellaneous – Active
9.5 Repeaters
9.6 Conclusion
References
Chapter 10: Small Cells
10.1 What is a Small Cell?
10.2 Small Cell Species
10.3 The Case for Small Cells
10.4 History and Standards
10.5 Architecture and Management
10.6 Coverage, Capacity and Interference
10.7 Business Case
10.8 Regulation
10.9 Small Cells Compared With Other Indoor Wireless Technologies
10.10 Market
10.11 Future: New Architectures and Towards 5G
References
Chapter 11: In-Building Case Studies
11.1 Public Venue
11.2 Stadium
11.3 Shopping Centre
11.4 Business Campus
11.5 Underground (Subway)
References
Index
End User License Agreement
List of Tables
Table 2.1
Table 2.2
Table 2.3
Table 2.4
Table 3.1
Table 3.2
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 5.1
Table 5.2
Table 5.3
Table 5.4
Table 5.5
Table 5.6
Table 5.7
Table 5.8
Table 5.9
Table 6.1
Table 7.1
Table 7.2
Table 8.1
Table 8.2
Table 8.3
Table 8.4
Table 8.5
Table 8.6
Table 8.7
Table 8.8
Table 11.1
Table 11.2
Table 11.3
Table 11.4
Table 11.5
Table 11.6
Table 11.7
Table 11.8
Table 11.9
Table 11.10
Table 11.11
Table 11.12
Table 11.13
Table 11.14
Table 11.15
Table 11.16
Table 11.17
Table 11.18
Table 11.19
Table 11.20
Table 11.21
Table 11.22
Table 11.23
Table 11.24
Table 11.25
Table 11.26
Table 11.27
Table 11.28
Table 11.29
Table 11.30
Table 11.31
Table 11.32
Table 11.33
Table 11.34
Table 11.35
Table 11.36
List of Illustrations
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.10
Figure 2.11
Figure 2.12
Figure 2.13
Figure 2.14
Figure 2.15
Figure 2.16
Figure 2.17
Figure 2.18
Figure 2.19
Figure 2.20
Figure 2.21
Figure 2.22
Figure 2.23
Figure 2.24
Figure 2.25
Figure 2.26
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.10
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.12
Figure 3.13
Figure 3.14
Figure 3.15
Figure 3.16
Figure 3.17
Figure 3.18
Figure 3.19
Figure 3.20
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.9
Figure 4.10
Figure 4.11
Figure 4.12
Figure 4.13
Figure 4.14
Figure 4.15
Figure 4.16
Figure 4.17
Figure 4.18
Figure 4.19
Figure 4.20
Figure 4.21
Figure 4.22
Figure 4.23
Figure 4.24
Figure 4.25
Figure 4.26
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.7
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.10
Figure 5.11
Figure 5.12
Figure 5.13
Figure 5.14
Figure 5.15
Figure 5.16
Figure 5.17
Figure 5.18
Figure 5.19
Figure 5.20
Figure 5.21
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.6
Figure 6.7
Figure 6.8
Figure 6.9
Figure 6.10
Figure 6.11
Figure 6.12
Figure 6.13
Figure 6.14
Figure 6.15
Figure 6.16
Figure 6.17
Figure 6.18
Figure 6.19
Figure 6.20
Figure 6.21
Figure 6.22
Figure 6.23
Figure 6.24
Figure 6.25
Figure 6.26
Figure 6.27
Figure 6.28
Figure 6.29
Figure 6.30
Figure 6.31
Figure 6.32
Figure 6.33
Figure 6.34
Figure 6.35
Figure 6.36
Figure 6.37
Figure 6.38
Figure 6.39
Figure 6.40
Figure 6.41
Figure 6.42
Figure 6.43
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.5
Figure 7.6
Figure 7.7
Figure 7.8
Figure 7.9
Figure 7.10
Figure 7.11
Figure 7.12
Figure 7.13
Figure 7.14
Figure 7.15
Figure 7.16
Figure 7.17
Figure 7.18
Figure 7.19
Figure 7.20
Figure 7.21
Figure 7.22
Figure 7.23
Figure 7.24
Figure 7.25
Figure 7.26
Figure 7.27
Figure 7.28
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.3
Figure 8.4
Figure 8.5
Figure 8.6
Figure 8.7
Figure 8.8
Figure 8.9
Figure 9.1
Figure 9.2
Figure 9.3
Figure 9.4
Figure 9.5
Figure 9.6
Figure 9.7
Figure 9.8
Figure 9.9
Figure 9.10
Figure 9.11
Figure 9.12
Figure 9.13
Figure 9.14
Figure 9.15
Figure 9.16
Figure 10.1
Figure 10.2
Figure 10.3
Figure 10.4
Figure 10.5
Figure 10.6
Figure 11.1
Figure 11.2
Figure 11.3
Figure 11.4
Figure 11.5
Figure 11.6
Figure 11.7
Figure 11.8
Figure 11.9
Figure 11.10
Figure 11.11
Figure 11.12
Figure 11.13
Figure 11.14
Figure 11.15
Figure 11.16
Figure 11.17
Figure 11.18
Figure 11.19
Figure 11.20
Figure 11.21
Figure 11.22
Figure 11.23
Figure 11.24
Figure 11.25
Figure 11.26
Figure 11.27
Figure 11.28
Figure 11.29
Figure 11.30
Figure 11.31
Figure 11.32
Figure 11.33
Figure 11.34
Figure 11.35
Figure 11.36
Figure 11.37
Figure 11.38
Figure 11.39
Figure 11.40
Figure 11.41
Figure 11.42
Figure 11.43
Figure 11.44
Figure 11.45
Figure 11.46
Figure 11.47
Figure 11.48
Figure 11.49
Figure 11.50
Figure 11.51
Figure 11.52
Figure 11.53
Figure 11.54
Figure 11.55
Figure 11.56
Figure 11.57
Figure 11.58
Figure 11.59
Figure 11.60
Figure 11.61
Figure 11.62
Figure 11.63
Guide
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
Chapter 1
Pages
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
xix
xx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
Indoor Wireless Communications
From Theory to Implementation
Alejandro Aragón-Zavala
This edition first published 2017© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Alejandro Aragón-Zavala to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered OfficesJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial OfficeThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UKFor details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty
While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data is available for this book.
ISBN 9780470741160 (hardback)
Cover Design: WileyCover Image: ©Wangwukong/Gettyimages
Lefis, Co, Oji and Fimbie, finally this is done. Thanks for keeping me up and running in this project. I could have not done it without your support, especially at those times of difficulties. I entirely dedicate this to you, Arafra.
Alejandro Aragón-Zavala
Preface
It all started in my early days of PhD work at the University of Surrey, UK. I remember that on my first year and while searching for literature related to in-building radio systems, to my surprise, there was not any book available on indoor radio networks at the time. I had quick chats with some of my professors and co-students to see if they have seen anything related at all; the answer was the same in all cases: there is nothing out there – only papers and articles, that was all.
Later on and while working at Cellular Design Services, I again needed to search for some reference material as we were in the middle of a very large project related to wireless infrastructure in airports. The only things I could find were chapters in some books, which had scattered information and was a jig-saw puzzle task to put all the pieces together. That is where I had the very first idea of having a single book that could cover all indoor radio aspects in a simple but useful way.
On my return to Mexico, I finally decided to start working on producing a book that could fulfil all the needs from an engineer or specialist willing to work on in-building radio design, covering many aspects of what I had learnt both in research and in industry.
This book includes materials and knowledge acquired after many years of experience and hard work in the field of indoor wireless communications. It goes from the very basics of building characteristics and ‘things to look at’ when designing a radio network in a certain type of building to more sophisticated propagation models, capacity calculations and a chapter on case studies that covers practical aspects of real indoor designs.
I believe this book can be very useful as a practical reference for scientists and engineers involved in the design, planning and operational aspects of new infrastructures for wireless communication systems inside buildings, a field that is growing very rapidly around the world. It could also be used as a text for graduate students or final year undergraduates willing to expand their knowledge in the field of in-building radio systems.
I am solely responsible not only for technical inaccuracies but also for typos. I would appreciate any feedback to [email protected], where comments, corrections or recommendations are welcome. An errata file will be kept and sent to anyone interested, upon request.
First of all, I would like to thank Prof. Simon R. Saunders for all his help and support during the writing of this book and for taking the time to contribute to the Small Cells chapter. In particular, thanks Simon for your friendship all these years and for your valuable guidance.
I also like to thank Dr Vladan Jevremovic for contributing to the Case Studies chapter and for sharing those valuables calls where we discussed key aspects of what is going on in the indoor wireless industry.
Thanks to all the iBwave Solutions Inc. team for their help, in particular to Dr Ali Jemmali, Benoit Courchese, Dominique Gauthier and Peter Thalmeir. I have learnt much from you – the experts in in-building radio design!
I wish to thank the support received by Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Querétaro and Campus Monterrey authorities and especially thanks to Dr Héctor Morelos-Borja, Dr David Muñoz-Rodríguez and Dr Manuel I. Zertuche. Special thanks also to all my graduate students who helped me during the elaboration of this work and for those who have shared with me useful discussions after lectures.
A very special group of people who helped me with bits and pieces of this book throughout the years is that from Real Wireless Ltd. Thanks to Mark Keenan, Kostas Konstantinou and Julie Bradford; we have worked in many really interesting in-building projects from which you have shared the best of your knowledge and attitude with me.
This book is dedicated to all my students, both graduate and undergraduate, from Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Querétaro; you are truly my inspiration and my motor to keep myself updated.
Finally, I wish to thank the valuable support from John Wiley & Sons editorial team, especially to Mark Hammond, Tiina Wigley, Ashmita Thomas Rajaprathapan, Sarah Tilley, Susan Barclay, Victoria Taylor, Liz Wingett and Sandra Grayson, for all their patience, enthusiasm and support given to me throughout these years. Thanks for always keeping a nice smile and encouraging comments!
Dr Alejandro Aragón-Zavala
Santiago de Querétaro, MexicoAutumn 2016
1Introduction
1.1 Motivation
Currently around 70% of mobile usage is inside buildings and some analysts predict that in the next few years around 90% of mobile usage will take place indoors (Paolini, 2011), be it at home, in the office or in public buildings, with the majority of that being in an individual user's home and main office locations. Traditionally such services have been provided on an ‘outside-in’ basis from macrocells, which were originally deployed to provide voice coverage to vehicles travelling along major roads. This conventional architecture is increasingly limited in its ability to meet modern mobile users' needs for reliable indoor mobile service because:
The increased volume of mobile data use puts a greater load on macrocell capacity to deliver a reliable service.
User expectations of the minimum data rate that constitutes a viable service are continuing to increase and are dominated by the indoor locations in which they mostly consume services.
Modern mobile devices have to support a wide range of frequency bands in a small-form factor, reducing their sensitivity and hence increasing the signal strength needed to achieve a given coverage.
Improved thermal insulation properties of buildings lead to an increase in the use of denser and more conductive external construction materials, including metallized windows, increasing the losses that radio waves encounter in penetrating a building.
Increased use of high-frequency bands at 2.1 GHz, 2.4 GHz, 2.6 GHz, 3.5 GHz and beyond, which suffer greater losses than frequencies below 1 GHz.
Economic incentives for mobile operators to share macrocell networks, reducing the diversity of options for users to switch to operators who do have macrocell coverage close to the locations they care most about.
In consumer surveys, mobile users frequently cite poor in-building coverage as the number one network-related reason to turn to other operators. Increased mobile data usage has changed customer priorities and expectations. Smartphone users rate the importance of messaging and Internet quality 2.5 times higher than standard phone users. Even the average phone user rated network quality as the most important reason for choosing a mobile operator. Mobile Internet is much more demanding than a few years ago, requiring Wi-Fi coverage as a ‘default’ commodity. All these factors increase the need of specialized indoor radio technologies to satisfy such user expectations and demands.
A recent global mobile consumer survey audit conducted by Deloitte (2012) examined the use of Wi-Fi by mobile users and found:
In the UK, Wi-Fi is the main Internet connection for smartphones at nearly 60%.
The desire for faster, more reliable connectivity is the principal driver of Wi-Fi usage over cellular mobile.
Almost 90% of both smartphone and tablet users connect to the Internet using Wi-Fi from home.
Given this and the potential loss in consumer and societal benefits arising from poor in-building services, it is very relevant to consider the planning and design of in-building radio systems following a methodological and engineering approach, considering:
The types of indoor wireless technologies and their characteristics
Design requirements and standards for coverage and capacity
Voice and data traffic considerations when deploying an indoor radio solution
The physics of in-building radio propagation
Channel modelling options that are available to estimate coverage in an indoor radio system
Available RF and antenna equipment for indoor systems
Measurement techniques and systems used to design and validate in-building networks
Practical issues related to indoor radio design and deployment that could be useful for engineers, students and scientists.
1.2 Evolution of Macro to Heterogeneous Networks
The changing shape of mobile networks from the traditional macrocell approach to what is known as heterogeneous networks or ‘HetNets’ (a mix of macro and small-cell architectures) can both resolve issues for the operator but at the same time create potential policy problems for telecommunications regulators, notably:
Future demand for spectrum.
The indoor layer of the network starts to soak up the rapid increase in demand and the value of future mobile spectrum allocations may be reduced.
Interference management.
Current policy stipulates that coordination between multioperators should be resolved by each party. A market-driven change into the network architecture may impact the regulatory policy in this area.
Competition between MNOs.
Competition may start to be reduced by the growing use of multioperator collaborations on both the core network and on the Radio Access Network.
Incentives for investment.
There may come a time when operators reduce their level of investment in the macronetwork to focus on serving the indoor consumers with smaller more cost effective building solutions.
Consumer switching.
This is encouraged by operators marketing their new products and services.
Traditionally, when MNOs first deployed their mobile networks they were designed for:
Wide area coverage
Targeting mobile voice
Roads/carphones.
However, in today's network topology the demand from users has dramatically shifted towards the consumption of data anywhere, anytime, which has led to the following trends:
Usage is predominantly indoors (70–90% of the traffic by volume) (Analysis Mason Ltd, 2011).
The indoor locations of relevance are predominantly just two per person (my home, my office), that is not just geographical coverage.
Indoor coverage is often cited by operators as the number one network-related cause of churn.
Smartphones have poorer sensitivity than traditional phones – and it gets worse as more bands are added.
Even voice is increasingly on 3G and LTE: better link budget, but mainly 2.1 GHz today.
User expectation of what constitutes the minimum acceptable data rate increases with time (as does expectation of typical rates).
Building regulations increasingly specify thermal insulation requirements, which are increasingly being met by metallized glass, significantly increasing attenuation.
There are three broad indoor user environments to consider for in-building systems. These are in the home, in the office or in a public building/venue. There are distinct differences in terms of both achieving coverage and satisfying capacity in each of these environments that impact the scale of the market and the optimum technical solution when considering indoor solutions.
1.3 Challenges
This book aims at presenting methods and techniques of how in-building coverage can be enhanced relative to that provided by the existing (predominantly macrocell-based) networks at predominantly a technical level but including also some commercial level detail. For example, one particular challenge to be addressed for anyone interested in designing an in-building radio system may be openness of any systems and we ask the question: ‘What do we mean by “allowing access to different operators”?’ The following points attempt to provide some possible solutions:
One solution can simultaneously handle users with different operators.
Solutions are cheap, unobtrusive and simple enough to permit multiples of them in one location if needed.
It could work for any operator and can be changed between operators at the user's choice (but only phones from one operator at a time).
It is easy and cheap to switch operators even if one ‘box’ cannot handle multiple operators.
Allow consumers to take action themselves rather than ‘begging’ an operator; for example, three currently limit femtocells to those who they consider have a valid coverage problem.
How does this compare and contrast with being able to move your phone between providers, move contracts between providers or move gateways/home hubs between providers.
The increased use of Wi-Fi presents further challenges and issues to cellular operators and good knowledge of the technology is mandatory for deploying a whole radio network, as nowadays Wi-Fi needs to coexist with cellular and other wireless technologies. Following this trend, mobile operators are beginning to adopt Wi-Fi as a complementary service as an in-building solution, principally to help offloading capacity constrained parts of the network. However, there are still some technical issues from Wi-Fi that, once overcome, will provide a more integrated solution for mobile operators.
The overriding issue for operators is one of cost: while macrocells have technical challenges in addressing remaining in-building demand, they have the benefit of spreading the costs over large numbers of users, resulting in the former operator mantra ‘outside-in always wins’. Provision of in-building systems for every building with a need has hitherto been excessively expensive, in both equipment and professional services.
New technologies do provide opportunities to significantly reduce the cost of provision, but significant work remains to encourage widespread roll-out of these technologies, including consumer understanding, commercial incentives and regulatory clarity. Some of these issues are to be reviewed throughout this book, illustrating some concepts with case studies to make understanding much easier.
Finally, it is well known that buildings have a very large variety of shapes, partitions, floors, materials, etc., which makes them very difficult to be categorized for design purposes. On top of this, propagation inside buildings is much more complex than in open spaces, thus making the planning of an indoor radio network more challenging. This book presents in a simple and complete way the physics of radio propagation inside buildings as well as methods to design and plan indoor networks, considering various technologies and a handful of mathematical models to use. Sufficient references are given at the end of each chapter for the interested reader to investigate further.
1.4 Structure of the Book
The book is organized into eleven chapters, including this chapter, the introduction to the world of in-building radio systems. An overview of various indoor wireless technologies is given to the reader in Chapter 2, for a better perspective on the current available technologies and their characteristics.
From a design perspective, the first step is to establish a clear set of requirements. Therefore, the reader is introduced in Chapter 3 to the specific requirements that any indoor wireless system may have. These issues are discussed in detail, to make sure the reader understands each and foresees the importance of taking them into account for a successful system deployment. This includes the different types of indoor environments present (corporate office, airport, theatre, shopping centre, etc.) for a radio designer to identify specific characteristics and additional requirements.
Once all of the main requirements for an indoor system have been established, a study of the propagation phenomena occurring in an in-building environment is needed. From the propagation mechanisms to the scales of mobile signal variation, all aspects to be considered in terms of radio propagation are covered in Chapter 4.
Channel models are explained in Chapter 5, for both narrowband and wideband fast fading as well as for median path loss, specifically for indoor systems. The models are not exclusive for any technology, but will cover all ranges of indoor wireless technologies, for the reader to have a useful reference.
The antenna requirements listed in Chapter 6 will be discussed for the case of in-building systems, referencing to some characteristics that indoor antennas must have. Antenna theory is included for completeness, especially to avoid the need to refer to specialized antenna books in addition to the information provided here.
Due to the importance that indoor radio measurements have in the in-building design process, Chapter 7 is dedicated to measurements, starting with basic concepts and highlighting important issues to be considered, from my experience over 10 years on indoor wireless measurements. A section on indoor model tuning is included at the end of the chapter, since this is a common practice in practical indoor wireless designs.
Capacity is presented in Chapter 8, which is one of the essential requirements for an indoor wireless system. Careful planning and dimensioning will allow system resources to be used efficiently, especially for those high-demanding applications involving indoor scenarios. Data transmission-related issues that affect some indoor wireless systems are also discussed here.
Chapter 9 is about RF and distribution systems and components used in in-building radio systems. The aim of the chapter is to provide the reader with a deep survey on existing equipment available for indoor wireless design, covering all technologies and levels. Transmission lines have been included here to illustrate what can be used to interconnect elements within the architecture of the distribution system, and not to show any connection with users. Examples of commercial equipment are shown.
Chapter 10 presents a brief overview on small cells and their importance inside buildings. Finally, Chapter 11 includes case studies for in-building designs, where a design approach is applied for each study, having different parameters and technologies.
References
Analysis Mason Ltd (2011) Wireless Network Traffic 2010–2015: Forecasts and Analysis, A Research Forecast report by Terry Norman, Analysis Mason Ltd.
Deloitte (2012)
The Data Capacity Crunch: Challenges and Strategies
, Mobile Broadband Specialist Interest Group, presentation by Deloitte to Cambridge Wireless event on 10 October 2012,
http://www.cambridgewireless.co.uk/Presentation/Mobile.Broadband_David.Griffin.Intro_10.10.12.pdf
.
Paolini, M. (2011) Mobile data move indoors,
Mobile Europe
, retrieved 14 September 2011. URL:
http://www.senzafiliconsulting.com/Blog/tabid/64/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/59/M%20obile-data-move-indoors.aspx
.
2Indoor Wireless Technologies
This book is not exclusive of any indoor wireless technology; instead, an effort has been made to present an overview of design, planning and deployment issues that may be applicable to many wireless technologies. An understanding of the various standards and protocols is therefore a necessary asset for any in-building radio planner or designer, since nowadays the deployment of multioperator, multitechnology networks is becoming more frequent.
This chapter aims at providing a brief overview of wireless technologies that are frequently encountered inside buildings. Special emphasis is given to cellular and Wi-Fi, two of the most important wireless technologies deployed inside buildings for which coexistence and design issues need to be carefully considered.
2.1 Cellular
Perhaps one of the most revolutionizing developments in the communications industry in the twentieth century has been the invention of the cellular concept. Since the creation of fixed telephony and other wired communication systems such as the telegraph, the possibility of having mobility while holding a conversation seemed possible but maybe not so feasible, as the size of electronic equipment still made it prohibitive for a device to be portable within a reasonable cost. Nowadays, not only are mobile voice communications possible but also data communications are a reality with increasing data rates, utilizing the spectrum more efficiently. It could be said that cellular has been one of the wireless technologies that has mostly driven research and development efforts in the last century, as users are demanding higher speeds, with connectivity everywhere and at every time.
Interestingly enough, in-building cellular has also become a major breakthrough in the history of cellular telephony. In the early days, the main objective was to deliver sufficient signal strength in geographical regions denoted as cells, which were mainly outdoors. In-building coverage was achieved by flooding the building with power from surrounding base stations. As voice was the main driver and capacity was not a big issue, this seemed to be enough for a few years. However, as larger facilities such as airports, shopping centres, etc., demanded more capacity, the need to deploy dedicated in-building networks was inevitable.
There have been various generations of cellular telephony that have been developed throughout the years, including: GSM, AMPS, IS-95, WCDMA, IMT-2000, LTE, HSPA, etc. All of them have their characteristics and particularities that need to be understood when deploying in-building radio networks. Since the aim of this book is not to provide a deep understanding of each of these standards, the key elements and characteristics of each standard will be highlighted, especially those that are relevant for indoor systems. For a nice and expanded overview of each of these technologies please refer to Tolstrup (2011).
2.1.1 The Cellular Concept
In the early days of mobile telephony around the 1950s, coverage and capacity were provided by a single transceiver, also known as BTS, capable of radiating sufficient power to illuminate a large area and thus provide service to users. Each BTS, generically known as a base station (BS), was designed to cover, as completely as possible, a designated area or cell. The main problem with this was the use of the available radio resources: even having a trunked capacity, the number of users was very restricted. That is when the concept of frequency reuse was introduced.
The frequency reuse strategy involved the division of the radio access network into overlapping cells, as depicted in Figure 2.1, so that a cluster of frequencies could be reused within a geographical area, minimizing the levels of interference and therefore providing service to more users. In Figure 2.1 a cluster is made of seven cells, each having a different channel (A–G) and can be reused. The idea of handover was also possible since now users within an area could have seamless mobility between cells.
Figure 2.1 Frequency reuse.
As will be discussed in Chapter 8, capacity in a cellular network aims at providing service to users in a designated area. For in-building networks, a method commonly employed to increase capacity is known as cell splitting, where smaller cells are utilised to increase the frequency reuse pattern and take advantage of the propagation conditions in the building to limit coverage levels. Sectorization is also employed, especially in stadiums where high capacity is required, by the use of directional antennas to decrease the co-channel interference at certain directions and accommodate more users.
For most cellular networks, regardless of the specific standard, there are two main types of cell configurations. In an omnidirectional cell, the BS is depicted at the centre of the cell and omnidirectional antennas are used (Figure 2.2a). For sector cells, the BS is located on three of the six cell vertices, as shown in Figure 2.2b. Three- or six-cell sectors are often found in cellular networks, many of them in a similar configuration as the base station shown in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.2 Cell configurations: (a) omnidirectional; (b) sector.
Figure 2.3 Cellular base station.
As for many other radio communication systems, noise and interference are to be minimized in order to guarantee an optimal service performance to provide a desired quality-of-service. In particular, interference is of special relevance since the frequency reuse permits the assignment of co-channel frequencies to cells at a minimum distance so that interference levels can be kept within tolerable limits. This is particularly important for indoor networks, since sector configurations are commonly deployed and interference control is essential there. On the other hand, noise limits the capacity in some cellular systems, as in the case of the uplink in WCDMA, so it should be properly controlled.
A very brief overview of the key cellular technologies is presented in the following sections, highlighting relevant aspects that need to be taken into account when designing in-building radio networks.
2.1.2 GSM
Figure 2.4 shows the key elements of a standard GSM cellular network. The central hub of the network is the mobile switching centre (MSC), often simply called the switch. This provides connection between the cellular network and the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and also between cellular subscribers. Details of the subscribers for whom this network is the home network are held on a database called the home location register (HLR), while the details of subscribers who have entered the network from elsewhere are on the visitor location register (VLR). These details include authentication and billing details, plus the current location and status of the subscriber. The coverage area of the network is handled by a large number of base stations. The base station subsystem (BSS) is composed of a base station controller (BSC), which handles the logical functionality, plus one or several base transceiver stations (BTS) containing the actual RF and baseband parts of the BSS. The BTSs communicate over the air interface (AI) with the mobile stations (MS). The air interface includes all of the channel effects as well as the modulation, demodulation and channel allocation procedures within the MS and BTS. A single BSS may handle 50 calls and an MSC may handle some 100 BSSs.
Figure 2.4 Elements of a standard cellular system, using GSM terminology.
GSM was originally licensed to operate in the 900 MHz band. More spectra were allocated later on, in 1800 MHz, for a standard known as DCS1800. Both were deployed in Europe, and many other countries in the world use the same frequency bands. In the Americas, the bands 800 MHz and 1900 MHz are used for GSM.
Although GSM was mainly designed to provide voice services at a speed of 9.6 kbps, some overhead was left in the data resources, so this overhead was used for transmitting short messages, leading to the SMS service. Later on, some limited data capabilities were included in the standard using packet data, introducing GPRS and EDGE. By using more sophisticated modulation schemes, data rates of up to 200–300 kbps could be achieved.
GSM uses separate frequency bands for the uplink (UL) and downlink (DL). This scheme is known as Frequency Division Duplex (FDD). The two bands are separated by 45 MHz on GSM900 and by 95 MHz on DCS1800. The spectrum allocated to GSM is divided into 200-kHz channels, and each of these channels is divided into eight time slots to be used as logical and traffic channels.
Handovers in GSM are ‘hard’, which means that the mobile monitors the Rx level of neighbouring cells and if the handover criteria is fulfilled (e.g. insufficient signal level, poor signal quality, etc.) the network commands the mobile to hand over to a new serving cell, using a different channel. Handovers are possible between cells or between sectors in a cell.
For GSM in-building systems, there are some considerations that are relevant to take into account when planning and designing the network, and could be summarized as follows:
Coverage is achieved either by macrocell penetration or a dedicated indoor cell using distribution systems (antennas or leaky feeders) and adjusted so that dominance is achieved inside the building.
Handover overlapping areas are desired to allow mobiles to have sufficient time to handoff between cells/sectors, especially in venues like airports where, for example, handover from the macrocell to the indoor cell needs to be achieved right at the entrance of the terminal building.
Voice traffic is dimensioned using trunking theory, as discussed in
Chapter 8
, and more channels can be allocated depending on Grade of Service (GoS) requirements. For larger traffic demands in densely populated venues, such as airports, the system can be upgraded by adding more capacity to the base stations and by performing zoning or further cell splitting, thus enhancing the frequency reuse. Special care should be taken to maintain
levels within specs.
Capacity is limited by the number of available resources in the BTS and by traffic demands, which are ruled by trunking theory.
Co-channel and adjacent-channel interference need to be considered and taken into account, especially if sectors (zones) are deployed inside a building.
2.1.3 UMTS
The Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) was specified and selected for 3G since the use of the spectrum is very efficient. UMTS has a high rejection to narrowband interference using Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), being thus very robust against frequency selective fading.
For UMTS cells, users share the same frequency, having a distinct spreading code. Thus, most of radio planning for UMTS is based on noise and power control. Unlike GSM where cells are assigned a different frequency, the intercell interference needs to be minimized.
There are two main types of UMTS radio systems: TDD and FDD. For TDD systems, the same frequency is used for the UL and the DL, whereas for FDD systems different frequencies are used for UL and DL. The latter is the most frequently used WCDMA radio system and requires a paired set of bands and an equal bandwidth separated 95 MHz duplex distance throughout the band.
The frequency band 1920–1980 MHz is assigned for the UL for WCDMA-FDD and 2110–2170 MHz for DL. This is used worldwide, although WCDMA-TDD is used in a few countries. Most operators are assigned two or three carriers in the 2.1 GHz band per license, but considerations for reusing the GSM900 spectrum are being made to utilize it for UMTS (Tolstrup, 2011).
In UMTS a spread spectrum signal is used, having a bandwidth of 5 MHz. A spreading code is employed to spread the original narrowband signal throughout the spectrum. Thus the signal becomes less sensitive to selective interference; for example, intermodulation products from narrowband services.
The concept of frequency reuse in UMTS can be understood in a slightly different way to GSM. For UMTS the frequency reuse factor is 1 and different primary scrambling codes (highly orthogonal) are used per cell.
One of the key parameters for UMTS signal quality is the energy-bit-per-noise density ratio (). It is the reference point for link budget calculations and defines the maximum data rate possible with a given noise – the higher the data rates, the stricter the requirements.
On the other hand, the quality of the pilot channel is measured as , which is the energy per chip/interference density ratio measured on the pilot channel (CPICH). When the user equipment (UE) detects two or more CPICH with similar levels, it will enter soft handover. Thus, the UE constantly monitors the of the serving cell and adjacent cells and compares the quality of the of the serving CPICH against the quality of other measured CPICHs and trigger levels or thresholds to add or remove cells from the neighbour list. The CPICH thus defines the cell size.
There are two types of handovers in UMTS. The softer handover occurs when a UE is within the service area of cells originating from the same NodeB at the same power level, using both RF links, using two separate codes in the DL. On the other hand, soft handover occurs when a mobile is in the service area of two cells originating from a different NodeB, and thus the mobile will use one RF link to both base stations; that is macrodiversity.
Pilot pollution occurs when a mobile receives CPICH signals at similar levels from other cells that are not in the neighbour list. This is the case when a distant macrocell can be ‘seen’ in a high-rise building at one of the upper levels. This will cause interference of the serving cell's CPICH, the so-called pilot pollution. This problem can be solved if an indoor cell is installed inside the building and has dominance (Tolstrup, 2011).
UMTS is very sensitive to noise control, since all traffic is in the same frequency and all signals from active UE need to reach the NodeB at the same level. If one UE reaches the UL of the NodeB at a much higher level, it will interfere with all the other UEs in service on the same cell. Therefore, noise and power control are very important for UMTS networks.
The load of a UMTS cell determines to a great extent the soft capacity, as more traffic will bring more noise to the cell. Therefore, the load needs to be limited to around 60% to 65% in indoor cells as they are more isolated from macros and can in principle be loaded relatively high (Tolstrup, 2011).
The main issues that should be considered when designing UMTS indoor networks can be summarized as follows:
Interference management and control should be very strict, as all cells share the same frequency.
Power limits DL capacity, so sufficient antennas should be used to provide dedicated indoor coverage.
Noise limits UL capacity; therefore low noise devices should be employed in the front end of any distribution system.
Soft handover areas should be minimized, as this requires doubling the use of overhead and network resources.
In-building cell dominance should be guaranteed if a dedicated indoor solution is being deployed, as this minimizes the risk of pilot pollution.
2.1.4 HSPA
HSPA was developed to improve the speed of data rates in 3G cellular networks. It consists of an addition to the existing 3G network infrastructure and utilizes the power headroom not used by UMTS traffic channels. In the DL, data rates of 14.4 Mbps can be achieved and its best performance is achieved by deploying indoor DAS (Tolstrup, 2011). Data speeds are related to SNR and good radio links are obtained if antennas are closer to mobiles, as is the case of indoor DAS.
2.1.5 LTE
With the use of advanced and adaptive modulation schemes and MIMO, much higher data rates have been achieved. This is one of the key elements of long-term evolution (LTE), with downlink data speeds in the range of 100 Mbps and uplink speeds of up to 50 Mbps, which is based on the existing GSM/EDGE and UMTS/HSPA standards. Flexible bandwidths from 1.4 MHz to 20 MHz are also employed in LTE, ensuring compatibility with older networks and enough flexibility for network roll-out and deployment. In terms of spectrum efficiency LTE is three to four times better than HSPA (Tolstrup, 2011).
Indoor environments, as discussed in Chapter 4, are rich multipath environments, which for GSM networks, for example, are a challenge for power control and selective fading issues. However, since LTE utilizes MIMO, a strong multipath is much more beneficial, since it employs the scattering of the local clutter (short reflections) to create multipath parallel links at the same time, frequency and space, thus theoretically doubling the throughput of the channel. LTE uses advanced and adaptive modulation techniques so that for good radio links (closer to the base station or eNodeB), higher-order modulation is employed (64-QAM), whereas as the link quality is degraded (farther away from the eNodeB), lower modulation schemes are used such as QPSK.
In terms of mobility, LTE is optimized to support a maximum data rate for pedestrian speed (0–15 km/h) and still provide high-performance data throughput for 15–350 km/h, being functional for 350–500 km/h to support high-speed trains (Tolstrup, 2011).
LTE can operate in a paired spectrum for duplex operation (FDD), and therefore can be deployed in existing GSM or UMTS systems. It can also be deployed in an unpaired spectrum (TDD). The different LTE frequencies and bands used in different countries will mean that only multiband phones will be able to use LTE in all countries where it is supported.
Some key features of the LTE air interface can then be summarized as follows:
Low data transfer latencies (sub-5 ms latency for small IP packets in optimal conditions), lower latencies for handover and connection setup time than with previous radio access technologies.
Peak download rates up to 299.6 Mbit/s and upload rates up to 75.4 Mbit/s depending on the user equipment category (with
MIMO using 20 MHz of spectrum). Five different terminal classes have been defined from a voice centric class up to a high end terminal that supports the peak data rates. All terminals will be able to process 20 MHz bandwidth.
Improved support for mobility, exemplified by support for terminals moving at up to 350 km/h (220 mph) or 500 km/h (310 mph) depending on the frequency band.
OFDMA for the downlink and SC-FDMA for the uplink to save power.
Support for both FDD and TDD communication systems as well as half-duplex FDD with the same radio access technology.
Support for all frequency bands currently used by IMT systems by ITU-R.
Increased spectrum flexibility: 1.4 MHz, 3 MHz, 5 MHz, 10 MHz, 15 MHz and 20 MHz wide cells are standardized.
Support for cell sizes from tens of metres radius (femto- and picocells) up to 100 km (62 miles) radius macrocells. In the lower frequency bands to be used in rural areas, 5 km (3.1 miles) is the optimal cell size, 30 km (19 miles) having reasonable performance, and up to 100 km cell sizes supported with acceptable performance. In city and urban areas, higher frequency bands (such as 2.6 GHz in the EU) are used to support high-speed mobile broadband. In this case, cell sizes may be 1 km (0.62 miles) or even less.
Simplified architecture. The network side of E-UTRAN is composed only of eNodeBs.
Support for interoperation and coexistence with legacy standards (e.g., GSM/EDGE, UMTS and CDMA2000). Users can start a call or transfer data in an area using an LTE standard and, should coverage be unavailable, continue the operation without any action on their part using GSM/GPRS or W-CDMA-based UMTS or even 3GPP2 networks such as cdmaOne or CDMA2000.
Packet-switched radio interface.
Support for MBSFN (Multicast-Broadcast Single Frequency Network). This feature can deliver services such as Mobile TV using the LTE infrastructure, and is a competitor forDVB-H-based TV broadcast.
The LTE standard covers a range of many different bands, each of which is designated by both a frequency and a band number. In North America, 700, 750, 800, 850, 1900, 1700/2100 (AWS), 2500 and 2600 MHz (Rogers Communications, Bell Canada) are used (bands 2, 4, 7, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 41); 2500 MHz in South America; 700, 800, 900, 1800, 2600 MHz in Europe (bands 3, 7, 20); 800, 1800 and 2600 MHz in Asia (bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 40) and 1800 MHz and 2300 MHz in Australia and New Zealand (bands 3, 40).
There are various challenges that are envisaged when designing LTE indoor systems, which can be summarized as follows:
Leveraging the maximum performance from MIMO systems, requiring in-building systems designed to provide a sufficiently multipath rich environment while still achieving a high SNR.
Designing LTE systems that can in principle co-exist with WCDMA or HSPA networks, having the capability to accommodate more capacity as the network grows.
Performing a very careful interference management, especially in areas where LTE femtocells are deployed.
2.2 Wi-Fi
2.2.1 History
The Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) have been around for a few years, evolving from simple low data rate technologies towards more sophisticated and powerful protocols. Let us have a brief timeline perspective in the evolution of this technology (Figure 2.5).
1985.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) releases the ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band for the use of radio frequency (RF) energy for industrial, scientific and medical purposes other than communications. This is meant to be an unlicensed band. Over the years, the need to have more spectrum available for short-range, low-power communications systems has pushed regulatory bodies to allow its use for applications such as cordless phones, Bluetooth devices and WLAN systems.
1991.
NCR Corporation and AT&T, in a joint venture, invented the precursor to 802.11 in Nieuwegein, The Netherlands, intended to be used in cashier systems. The very first wireless products were under the name WaveLAN with data rates of 1 Mbps and 2 Mbps.
1992.
CSIRO (The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) obtained patents for a method used to ‘unsmear’ signals produced by WLAN networks.
1993.
Public access WLANs were first proposed by Henrik Sjödin at the NetWorld+Interop Conference in The Moscone Center in San Francisco in August 1993. Sjödin did not use the term ‘hotspot’ but referred to publicly accessible wireless LANs.
1997.
The technology is adopted by the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) and the working group 802.11 is created to create standards related to WLANs.
1999.
The Wi-Fi Alliance was formed. The IEEE released standards 802.11a (5 GHz, 54 Mbps) and 802.11b (2.4 GHz, 11 Mbps). This year was the first time in which the term ‘Wi-Fi’ was used commercially.
2000.
During the dot-com period in 2000, dozens of companies had the notion that Wi-Fi could become the payphone for broadband. The original notion was that users would pay for broadband access at hotspots. Since then, both paid and free hotspots continue to grow. Wireless networks that cover entire cities, such as municipal broadband, have mushroomed. Wi-Fi hotspots can be found in remote RV/Campground Parks across the US.
2003.
The IEEE releases the 802.11g standard, which is compatible to the 802.11b but can work at higher data rates, up to 54 Mbps using the 2.4 GHz frequency band.
2009.
The latest standard released by the IEEE related to WLAN is the 802.11n, having MIMO capabilities, with potential data rates of up to 600 Mbps using special combinations of modulation and coding schemes. It also operates at 2.4 GHz.
2010.
Most laptop computers come equipped with internal WLAN adapters as well as integrated antennas, something that facilitates its use, especially in hotspots.
Figure 2.5 History of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN).
Most WLAN operate over unlicensed frequencies at near Ethernet speeds using carrier-sense protocols to share a radio wave. The majority of these devices are capable of transmitting information between computers within an open environment. Figure 2.6 (right) illustrates the concept of a WLAN interfacing with a wired network, whereas the logical architecture of a WLAN is also shown in Figure 2.6 (left).
Figure 2.6 Generic Wi-Fi block diagram.
In general, WLAN perform the following functions to enable the transfer of information from source to destination:
The medium provides a bit pipe (a path for data flow) for the transmission of data.
Medium access techniques facilitate the sharing of a common medium.
Synchronization and error control mechanisms ensure that each link transfers the data intact.
Routing mechanisms move the data from the originating source to the intended destination.
Connectivity software interfaces an appliance to application software hosted on a server.
2.2.2 Medium Access Control (MAC) Sublayer
The MAC enables multiple appliances to share a common transmission medium via a carrier sense protocol similar to Ethernet. This protocol enables a group of wireless computers to share the same frequency and space. A WLAN MAC provides reliable delivery of data over somewhat error-prone wireless media. The protocol used for this purpose is Carrier Sense Multiple Access, where appliances can transmit only if the channel is ‘idle’ to avoid collisions.
2.2.3 Physical Layer
The physical layer provides for the transmission of bits through a communication channel by defining electrical, mechanical and procedural specifications. Modulation and multiple access methods are therefore defined as part of the physical layer.
2.2.4 Industry Bodies
The three main Wi-Fi industry bodies related to WLAN technology are: the Wi-Fi Alliance, the IEEE 802.11 working group, and the Wireless Broadband Alliance. A brief description of each follows.
2.2.4.1 Wi-Fi Alliance
The Wi-Fi Alliance (2015) is a trade association that promotes wireless LAN technology and certifies products if they conform to certain standards of interoperability. Not every IEEE 802.11-compliant device is submitted for certification to the Wi-Fi Alliance, sometimes because of costs associated with the certification process. The lack of the Wi-Fi logo does not necessarily imply a device is incompatible with Wi-Fi devices.
The Wi-Fi Alliance owns the Wi-Fi trademark. Manufacturers may use the trademark to brand certified products that belong to a class of wireless local area network (WLAN) devices based on the IEEE 802.11 standards. One of the benefits of certification of products towards the Wi-Fi Alliance is that interoperability amongst vendors is guaranteed.
