Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
In 1859, Charles Darwin shocked the world with a radical theory - evolution by natural selection. One hundred and fifty years later, his theory still challenges some of our most precious beliefs. Introducing Evolution provides a step-by-step guide to 'Darwin's dangerous idea' and takes a fresh look at the often misunderstood concepts of natural selection and the selfish gene. Drawing on the latest findings from genetics, ecology and animal behaviour- as well as the work of best-selling science writers such as Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker- this book reveals how the evidence in favour of evolutionary theory is stronger than ever.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 103
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Published by Icon Books Ltd, Omnibus Business Centre, 39–41 North Road, London N7 9DPEmail: [email protected]
ISBN: 978-184831-186-2
Text copyright © 2012 Icon Books Ltd
Illustrations copyright © 2012 Icon Books Ltd
The author and illustrator has asserted their moral rights
Originating editor: Richard Appignanesi
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
The Central Idea in Biology
Fear and Loathing in Kansas
Old Questions
Universal Acid
An Idea in Two Parts
What is Evolution?
The Fixity of Species
Independent Creation
Enough Time
The Age of the Earth
Old Bones
Dragons’ Teeth
What the Fossils tell Us
The Evidence from Carbon Dating
The Tree of Life
The Conquest of the Land
Four Legs Good
A Very Recent Species
Living Fossils
“Scientific” Creationism
Missing Links
How does Evolution Happen?
Darwin’s Contribution
So Simple, yet so Powerful
Three Conditions
Animal and Plant Copies
A Tale of Butterflies
A Change in Environment
Multicoloured Butterflies
Evolution by Natural Selection
Darwin’s Dangerous idea
The Argument from Design
Animals and Artefacts
Adaptations
Another Explanation for Biological Design
A Single Step
Many Small Steps
Start the Story Again
Cumulative Selection
What Good is Half a Wing?
The Blind Watchmaker
Occam’s Razor
No Need for that Hypothesis
Natural Selection Observed
Looking in More Detail: Heredity
Genes
The Function of Proteins
Development
Growth and Specialized Cells
Genes and Development
Genes and Environment
Mutation or Incorrect Copying
No Mutation, No Evolution
Random Drift
Adapation and Natural Selection
Not Everything is an Adaptation
Adaptive Prediction
Beneficial Mutations are Rare
Mutations are Random
Accumulation of Design
The Gene’s-eye View
The Selfish Game
Altruism
Biological Altruism is Common in Nature
Parental Care
The Puzzle of Altruism is Solved
A Thought Experiment
Two Conditions for Selfish Genery
The Green Beard Effect
Do Genes Influence Behaviour?
Genetic Determinism
Can Organisms Tell When Others Have the Same Genes?
Kin Selection
Blood is Thicker Than Water
Another Theory of Altruism
Tit-for-Tat
Reciprocal Altruism is Rare
The Peacock’s Tail
Why do Peahens Prefer Big Tails?
Natural Selection and Sexual Selection
Female Choice and Male Competition
The Runaway Process
Arms Races
The Antibiotics Arms Race
Co-evolution
The Origin of the Eukaryotes
Other Differences
Let’s Talk About Sex
Virgin Births
Clones and Genetic Difference
Meiosis and Gametes
Male and Female
Isogamy and Anisogamy
The Cost of Sex
What’s the Advantage of Sex?
The Family Swap
Reproductive Isolation
Gene Pools
The Biological Species Concept
The Phenetic Species Concept
Speciation
Splitting
Allopatric Speciation
Higher Groups and Lower Groups
Varieties of Dogs
Empires and Domains
Which is the Highest Group?
Monophyletic and Paraphyletic Groups
Cladism
The Tree of Life Again
The Trunk of the Tree
The Origin of Life
A Warm Little Pond
The Primordial Soup
Near the Sea-bed
Panspermia
Extinction
Mass Extinctions
The End of the Dinosaurs
Why Did the Dinosaurs Go Extinct?
A Hundred Million Megatons of TNT
The Lucky Ones
The Sixth Mass Extinction
Ecological Disaster
The End of the Human Race
Is the Earth One Giant Organism?
Organisms Are Designed By Natural Selection
Gaia
The Deadly Species
Killing Our Cousins
The Neanderthals
The Advantage of Language
Efficient Information-sharing
Extended Memory
The Speaking Animal
Human Universals
What is Human Nature?
Evolutionary Psychology
Massive Modularity
The Walls Came Tumbling Down
Science and Speculation
Survival Machine or Courtship Device?
Is Art a Sexual Display?
Humans and Culture
The Evolution of Culture
Memes or Mind-viruses?
Why Do Some Ideas Catch On More Than Others?
The Naturalness of Religious Ideas
Evolutionary Epistermology
Evolutionary Ethics
Moral Evolution
Moral Instincts
Moral Sentiments
Are Ideas Alive?
Artifical Life
Genetic Algorithms
Evolutionary Robotics
The Virtual World, Tierra
A Common Thread
The Controversy Continues
A Scientific Answer to the Deep Questions
The Wonder of Evolution
Science and Values
Further Reading
The Authors
Acknowledgements
Index
“Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution”, said the great Russian geneticist, Theodosius Dobzhansky (1900–75). The theory of evolution is indeed the central idea in modern biology.
And yet, in August 1999, one hundred and forty years after Darwin published The Origin of Species, the Kansas State Education Board removed the topic of evolution from the official curriculum.
Biology students in Kansas would now be able to graduate without learning the most fundamental idea in their discipline! Why? What could motivate a State Education Board to deprive students of such an important piece of knowledge?
The members of Kansas State Education Board clearly disliked the theory of evolution. They are not alone. Ever since Charles Darwin (1809–1882) and Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913) proposed the theory at a meeting of the Linnaean Society in 1858, it has inspired much fear and loathing, and many attempts have been made to suppress it.
When the Bishop of Birmingham’s wife heard about Darwin’s theory in 1880, she said to her husband...
My dear, let us hope it is not true; but, if it is true, let us hope it will not become generally known.
So what is it about Darwin’s theory that upsets people so much?
Darwin’s theory of evolution upsets people because it threatens all the old ideas about who we are and why we are here.
For thousands of years, human beings have wondered about the meaning of life.
Where do we come from?
And what is our purpose?
The traditional answers, provided by many religions, have usually involved the idea of a God – or gods.
God made us, the story goes, and put us here for a special reason. All of these traditional answers see humans as exceptional creatures. Humans are not just animals. Unlike animals, humans have spirits or souls. Only humans have free will. Only humans can survive death.
The theory of evolution threatens all these old ideas. It undermines the central claims of many religions. It seems to leave no room for God, or the soul, or life after death. Humans, it tells us, are just another kind of animal.
The American philosopher, Daniel Dennett (b. 1942), has described the theory of evolution as a kind of “universal acid”.
Did you ever hear of universal acid? This fantasy used to amuse me and some of my schoolboy friends... ...Universal acid is a liquid so corrosive that it will eat through anything!
Like universal acid, the theory of evolution eats through just about every traditional religious idea. This is why Dennett calls it “Darwin’s dangerous idea”.
Darwin’s dangerous idea comes in two parts: the theory of evolution, and the theory of natural selection. We will look at each of these two theories in turn, and then put them together. It is only when the two theories are put together that they become really dangerous.
It is not the theory of evolution on its own, nor the theory of natural selection on its own... ...but the theory of evolution by natural selection that really undermines religious beliefs.
We will begin with the theory of evolution.
The theory of evolution states that species can change. One species can give rise to another.
According to the theory of evolution, humans are descended from non-human ancestors. Ultimately, every species on Earth is descended from a single common ancestor, just as the branches on a tree all spring from a single trunk.
This might not seem like a big idea, but for thousands of years people in the West believed that species were fixed, unchanging entities. So it was a great shock to learn that this was not true.
The idea that species are fixed and unchanging dates back to Aristotle (384–322 BC), the great Greek philosopher and scientist. He based his belief on the evidence of his own eyes.
You never see a monkey give birth to a human, do you? Monkeys give birth to monkeys and humans give birth to humans.
So, not unreasonably, Aristotle concluded that one species could never give rise to another. Monkeys would always be monkeys. And humans must always have been human.
For hundreds of years, Christian scholars accepted Aristotle’s theory of the fixity of species. They believed that God had created each species independently at the beginning of time, and that each species then remained exactly the same up to the present.
We believe that the story told in the Bible, in the Book of Genesis, is literally true ...
“And now, from the clay of the ground, all the beasts that roam the earth and all that flies through the air were ready fashioned, and the Lord God brought them to Adam, to see what he would name them; the name Adam gave to each living creature is its name still.” (Genesis 2:19).
Eventually, in the 18th century, some people began to suggest that species were not fixed. They realized that species might change gradually. A monkey could not have a human baby.
But it could have a baby that was ever so slightly more humanlike. And that offspring could have an even more humanlike baby, and so on. Given enough time, there could be a series of many small steps linking a monkey ancestor to a human descendant.
Given enough time. That was the crucial point. And that was what the Church disputed. Even if it were theoretically possible for one species to give rise to another by a series of many small steps, there simply had not been enough time for monkeys to evolve into humans, let alone for all life to be descended from a single ancestor. The world was simply not that old, according to the Church.
When Bishop Ussher (1581–1656) added up all the figures in the Bible, he calculated that the world was created in 4004 BC. If the Bible was literally true, the earth could only be 6,000 years old. This was nowhere near enough time for evolution to take place.
But in the 19th century, geologists were already beginning to realize that the world was a lot older than this. There are clear patterns of erosions where rivers have cut into mountains – and yet it takes thousands of years for water to erode such rocks.
Today, a mass of other scientific evidence has confirmed what those early geologists suspected. The world is almost a million times older than Bishop Ussher thought. Current estimates put the age of the earth at around 4.5 billion years. That is easily long enough for evolution to have taken place.
So evolution could have taken place. There has been more than enough time for all the currently existing species to have descended from a single common ancestor in a series of many small steps.
However, it is not enough to know that evolution could have happened. We want to know whether or not evolution really did happen.
This is where fossils come in...
In 1811, Mary Anning found the skeleton of an Ichthyosaurus, a marine reptile that lived between 5 and 120 million years ago, in cliffs near Lyme Regis in Dorset.
The 21 foot long fossil found by Mary Anning.
For thousands of years, people have come across old bones in the rocks. Some of these bones resemble those from animals we see around us, but others clearly come from animals unlike anything alive today.
Huge fossil teeth, for example, have been found that could not come from any currently existing species of animal. Where do they come from?
Legends and myths arose to explain these strange discoveries.
Perhaps the fossil teeth originally belonged to dragons? Perhaps the world was once full of strange creatures that no longer exist?
The existence of strange fossils does not provide conclusive evidence against the fixity of species in itself. You can accept the idea that some species have become extinct without believing that one species can change into another. However, when you compare the various fossils that have been found, it is immediately obvious that they form patterns.
Many fossils can be arranged in sequences, in which there is a more or less continuous series connecting an earlier fossil with a later one.
When you compare the fossil at the beginning of the chain with the final one, they look very different. But between each of the intermediate fossils in the chain there is only a slight difference.