53,99 €
Investment in any new project invariably carries risk but the construction industry is subject to more risk and uncertainty than perhaps any other industry. This guide for construction managers, project managers and quantity surveyors as well as for students shows how the risk management process improves decision-making. Managing Risk in Construction Projects offers practical guidance on identifying, assessing and managing risk and provides a sound basis for effective decision-making in conditions of uncertainty. The book focuses on theoretical aspects of risk management but also clarifies procedures for undertaking and utilising decisions. This blend of theory and practice is the real message of the book and, with a strong authorship team of practitioners and leading academics, the book provides an authoritative guide for practitioners having to manage real projects. It discusses a number of general concepts, including projects, project phases, and risk attitude before introducing various risk management techniques. This third edition has been extended to recognize the reality of multi-project or programme management and the risks in this context; to highlight the particular problems of risk in international joint ventures; and to provide more coverage of PFI and PPP. With case studies and examples of good practice, the book offers the distilled knowledge of over 100 man-years of experience in working on all aspects of project risk, giving sound practical guidance on identifying, assessing and managing risk.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 457
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013
Table of Contents
Title Page
Copyright
Preface
Authors' Biographies
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1: Projects and Risk
1.1 Construction projects
1.2 Decision making
1.3 Risk management strategy
1.4 Project planning
1.5 Summary
Chapter 2: The Project Environment
2.1 Projects
2.2 The project constitution
2.3 Project organisation
2.4 Project phases
2.5 Effect of project phase on risk
2.6 Project appraisal
2.7 Summary
Chapter 3: Understanding the Human Aspects
3.1 Risk management—context
3.2 Risk management—organisations
3.3 The risk management process
3.4 Some guidelines to the risk management process
3.5 The risk workshop
3.6 Communication
3.7 Summary
Reference
Chapter 4: Qualitative Methods and Soft Systems Methodology
4.1 Qualitative risk assessment
4.2 Review of project programmes and budgets
4.3 The risk log
4.4 Using a risk log to formulate risk management strategy
4.5 Qualitative methods
4.6 Soft systems methodology
4.7 Case study: SSM in use in the procurement of construction projects
4.8 Summary
Chapter 5: Risk and Value Management
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Approaches to the management of risk
5.3 The standard risk management model
5.4 Applying risk and value management
5.5 Value management processes
5.6 Understanding the project risk
5.7 Applying value and risk management
5.8 Iteration of the process
5.9 Summary
References
Chapter 6: Quantitative Methods for Risk Analysis
6.1 Sanction
6.2 Project appraisal and selection
6.3 Project evaluation
6.4 Engineering risks
6.5 Risk management
6.6 Probabilistic analysis
6.7 Response to risks
6.8 Successful risk management
6.9 Principles of contingency fund estimation
Appendix 6.A: Alternative methods of risk analysis
Chapter 7: The Contribution of Information Technology to Risk Modelling and Simulation
7.1 Purpose of RMS
7.2 When to use RMS
7.3 Requirements of the analyst
7.4 Modelling and simulation
7.5 Modelling using RMS
7.6 Data management
7.7 Analytical mechanisms
7.8 Classification of RMS
7.9 Selection of RMS
7.10 Modelling a project for risk management
7.11 Data requirements for realistic modelling
7.12 Choice of variable distribution
7.13 Case study
7.14 Case study simulations
7.15 Analysis of the result
7.16 Discussion of findings
7.17 Summary
Chapter 8: Risk Allocation in the Contracting and Procurement Cycle
8.1 Typical contracting and procurement processes
8.2 Value planning case study
8.3 Known and unknown risks in contracts
8.4 Risk allocation strategies
8.5 Risk allocation according to payment mechanism
8.6 Contract award
8.7 Summary
Reference
Chapter 9: Managing Financial Risks in Major Construction and PFI/PPP Projects
9.1 Project financing
9.2 Types of finance
9.3 Appraisal and validity of financing projects
9.4 Typical financial risks
9.5 Promoter
9.6 Financial risk in concession contracts
9.7 Global and elemental risks in concession contracts
9.8 Summary
Chapter 10: Risks in International Construction Project Joint Ventures
10.1 Background
10.2 Concept of joint venture
10.3 Motives for joint venture formation
10.4 Assessing joint venture success
10.5 Case study
10.6 Summary
Acknowledgement
References
Chapter 11: Risk Management at Corporate, Strategic Business Unit and Project Levels
11.1 Risk in organisations
11.2 Risk management
11.3 The risk management process
11.4 Benefits of risk management
11.5 Recognising risks
11.6 Why risk management is used
11.7 Risk management actions at different levels
11.8 Summary
References
Chapter 12: Case Studies
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Heavy lift vessel design and fabrication programme risk assessment
12.3 Risk identification
12.4 High Speed 1
12.5 Brief history of HS1
12.6 The risk management process
12.7 Risk assessment, analysis and response
12.8 Summary of the preliminary schedule risk analysis results
Chapter 13: Risk Management in a Multi-Project Environment
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Drivers for the multi-project approach to project delivery
13.3 A conceptual model of the multi-project environment
13.4 Risks that are unique to or amplified in multi-project environments
13.5 The change in mindset required to manage risk in multi-project environments
13.6 Summary
References
Further reading
Chapter 14: Key Issues and Guidance in Practical Risk Management
14.1 Decision making
14.2 Preparation for risk management
14.3 Risk management process
14.4 Models
14.5 Uncertainty
14.6 Socio-technical approach to risk
14.7 Summary
References
Index
This edition first published 2014
© 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
© 2006 N. J. Smith
© 1999 by Blackwell Science Ltd, a Blackwell Publishing company
Registered office
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom.
Editorial offices:
9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, United Kingdom.
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom.
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Smith, Nigel J.
Managing risk in construction projects / Nigel J. Smith, Tony Merna, Paul Jobling. -- Third edition.
pages cm
Includes index.
ISBN 978-1-118-34723-2 (pbk.)
1. Building--Superintendence. 2. Building--Safety measures. 3. Construction industry--Management. 4. Risk assessment. I. Merna, Tony. II. Jobling, Paul, 1955- III. Title.
TH438.S54 2014
690.068′1--dc23
2013029977
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Cover image: iStockphoto / Rozaliya
Cover design by Steve Thompson.
Preface
Those of you wanting the answer to the problems of risk management might think of turning straight to the final chapter. Indeed, there you will find a summation of the key issues and of how risk management methods can empower the decision-making of the project manager. However, it is only a thorough understanding of the various concepts involved that can provide the real basis on which to make effective decisions.
The essence of the guidance is based on the interaction of concepts, user requirements and specific projects, and it is by obtaining a greater knowledge of the inherent nature of the project that improvements in performance can be found. Hence by examining the guidance in this context, the reader will be able to gain the maximum benefit from this book. The authors doubt many people will read this book from cover to cover but if key sections of the text serve to enhance understanding and to facilitate more effective project management then it will have achieved its purpose.
The third edition of this book has been extended to recognise the reality of multi-project or programme management and the risks in this context and to highlight the particular problems of risk in international joint ventures. Nevertheless, the basic concept of risk management as a process for making better decisions under conditions of uncertainty remains.
This book is not intended as a definitive monograph on risk but as a guide for practitioners having to manage real projects. The authors have assembled a strong team of practitioners and leading academics and have blended theory and practice to demonstrate how to approach the management of risk which is the real message of this work.
Authors' Biographies
Nigel J. Smith BSc, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, MAPM is Professor of Project & Transport Infrastructure Management and Head of School at the School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds. After graduating from the University of Birmingham, he gained practical experience with Wimpey, North East Road Construction Unit and the Department of Transport. Since returning to academia he has researched and published widely in the field of risk management and regularly teaches on MSc and CPD Risk Management Courses. He has presented papers on risk at many international conferences including Trondheim, Budapest, Florence, Moscow, Bonn and Brisbane. His current research interests include a socio-technical approach to risk and the nature of political risk.
Tony Merna BA, MPhil, PhD, CEng, MICE, MAPM, MIQA is Senior Partner of Oriel Group Practice, a multi-disciplinary research consultancy based in Manchester and a lecturer for Manchester Business School Worldwide (MBSW). He currently leads international risk management programmes for MBSW in the USA, Singapore, Dubai and other overseas institutions. Tony supervises MSc and PhD students researching in risk management. He advises numerous organisations on the application of risk management at corporate, strategic business unit and projects levels.
Paul Jobling BSc, MSc, CEng, MICE, MAPM is a Managing Consultant with Kingsfield Consulting. He has worked in the field of project and programme management since 1976. He was a member of the research team that produced the Guide to Risk Management in Construction published in 1986. At Eurotunnel he worked in the project control team developing procedures for risk analysis and contingency fund management. Further risk management and analysis work has included HS1 (the Channel Tunnel Rail Link), major nuclear decommissioning programmes and several major rail programmes and infrastructure projects. Paul was a member of the working party responsible for the production of the Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide published in 1997 by the Association for Project Management, and a member of the review team for the revised edition published in 2004. He is now working with international contractors to manage their commercial risks on oil, gas and infrastructure projects in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.
Acknowledgements
I am particularly grateful to my co-authors in this third edition, Tony Merna and Paul Jobling, for helping to update, modify and improve the existing text blending theory and practice. I would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Bernard Aritua of the World Bank in the new chapter (Chapter 13) regarding programme risk. In addition I would like to recognise the work of all the original authors of the earlier editions, namely Tony Merna Jr, Douglas Lamb, Dr Chris Adams, Dr Denise Bower, Mr Otto Husby and Ms Trina Norris.
I would like to express my thanks to Ms Madeleine Metcalfe and Chrisma Ng from Wiley/Blackwell and Krupa Muthu from Laserwords Pvt ltd for their help in processing, checking and questioning the book text and for her help with all aspects of the administration of the editing process.
Nevertheless, as was the case with previous editions, I take the responsibility for any residual risks associated with any errors in the book.
Nigel J. Smith
This book seeks to explain the nature of risk management and also to clarify the practical procedures for undertaking and utilising decisions. Risk management is beset by a dark cloak of technology, definitions and methodologies, often maintained by analysts and specialist consultants, which contributes to the unnecessary mystique and lack of understanding of the approach.
This book offers for the first time—in the opinion of the authors—the distilled knowledge of over a hundred man-years of project experience in working on aspects of project risk management and contains information which most of us would have liked to have had—had it been available and collated. To all students and practitioners using this book, follow known procedures as outlined in the book, avoid short-cuts and remember to keep records of everything you model, simulate or assume.
This chapter discusses a number of general concepts including projects, project phases and risk attitude before introducing a number of risk management strategies. The book concludes with some brief references to project planning.
Change is inherent in construction work. For years, industry has had a very poor reputation for coping with the adverse effects of change, with many projects failing to meet deadlines and cost and quality targets. This is not too surprising considering that there are no known perfect engineers, anymore than there are perfect designs or that the forces of nature behave in a perfectly predictable way. Change cannot be eliminated, but by applying the principles of risk management, engineers are able to improve the effective management of this change.
Change is normally regarded in terms of its adverse effects on project cost estimates and programmes. In extreme cases, the risk of these time and cost overruns can invalidate the economic case for a project, turning a potentially profitable investment into a loss-making venture. A risk event implies that there is a range of outcomes for that event which could be both more and less favourable than the most likely outcome, and that each outcome within the range has a probability of occurrence. The accumulation or combinations of risks can be termed project risk. This will usually be calculated using a simulation model (see Chapter 7). It is important to try to identify all the potential risks to the project even if they are not strictly events or a calculation of project risk. It is not possible to identify all risks and even at the end of a project you will only know the risks that actually occurred. However, risk management is concerned with identifying as many as is practicable of the sources and causes of risk because if a risk is not identified it cannot be considered in any part of the risk management process.
In construction projects each of the three primary targets of cost, time and quality will be likely to be subject to risk and uncertainty. It follows that a realistic estimate is one which makes appropriate allowances for all those risks and uncertainties which can be anticipated from experience and foresight. Project managers should undertake or propose actions which eliminate the risks before they occur, or reduce the effects of risk or uncertainty and make provision for them if they occur when this is possible and cost effective. It is vital to recognise the root causes of risks, and not to consider risks as events that occur almost at random. Risks can frequently be avoided if their root causes are identified and managed before the adverse consequence—the risk event—occurs. They should also ensure that the remaining risks are allocated to the parties in a manner which is likely to optimise project performance.
To achieve these aims it is suggested that a systematic approach is followed: to identify the risk sources; to quantify their effects (risk assessment and analysis); to develop management responses to risk; and finally to provide for residual risk in the project estimates. These four stages comprise the core of the process of risk management. Risk management can be one of the most creative tasks of project management.
The benefits of risk management can be summarised as follows:
project issues are clarified, understood and considered from the start;
decisions are supported by thorough analysis;
the definition and structure of the project are continually monitored;
clearer understanding of specific risks associated with a project;
build-up of historical data to assist future risk management procedures.
Risk management is a particular form of decision making within project management, which is itself the topic of many textbooks and papers. Risk management is not about predicting the future. It is about understanding your project and making a better decision with regard to the management of your project, tomorrow. Sometimes that decision may be to abandon the project. If that is the correct outcome saving various parties from wasting time, money and skilled human resources, then the need for a rational, repeatable, justifiable risk methodology and risk interpretation is paramount. Nevertheless, the precise boundaries between decision making and the aspects of other problem-solving methodologies have always been difficult to establish.
In essence, decisions are made against a predetermined set of objectives, rules and/or priorities based upon knowledge, data and information relevant to the issue although too often this is not the case. Frequently decisions are ill-founded, not based on a logical assessment of project-specific criteria and lead to difficulties later. It is not always possible to have conditions of total certainty; indeed in risk management it is most likely that a considerable amount of uncertainty about the construction project exists at this stage.
The terms risk and uncertainty can be used in different ways. The word risk originated from the French word risqué, and began to appear in England, in its anglicised form, around 1830, when it was used in insurance transactions. Risk can be, and has been, defined in many ways and assessed in terms of fatalities and injuries, in terms of probability of reliability, in terms of a sample of a population or in terms of the likely effects on a project. All these methodologies are valid and particular industries or sectors have chosen to adopt particular measures as their standard approach. As this book concentrates on engineering projects, risk is defined in the project context, and broadly follows the guidelines and terminology adopted by the British Standard on Project Management BS 6079, The Association for Project Management Body of Knowledge, The Association for Project Management Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide, the Institution of Civil Engineers and the Faculty of Actuaries Risk Analysis and Management for Projects Guide and the HM Treasury, Central Unit on Procurement Guide on Risk Assessment.
A number of authors state that uncertainty should be considered as separate from risk because the two terms are distinctly different. Uncertainty can be regarded as the chance occurrence of some event where the probability distribution is genuinely not known. This means that uncertainty relates to the occurrence of an event about which little is known, except the fact that it may occur. Those who distinguish uncertainty from risk define risk as being where the outcome of an event, or each set of possible outcomes, can be predicted on the basis of statistical probability. This understanding of risk implies that there is some knowledge about a risk as a discrete event or a combination of circumstances, as opposed to an uncertainty about which there is no knowledge. In most cases, project risks can be identified from experience gained by working on similar projects.
Risks fall into three categories; namely known risks, known unknowns and unknown unknowns. Known risks include minor variations in productivity and swings in material costs. These occur frequently and are an inevitable feature of all construction projects. Known unknowns are the risk events whose occurrence is predictable or foreseeable. Either their probability of occurrence or their likely effect is known. Unknown unknowns are those events whose probabilities of occurrence and effect are not foreseeable by even the most experienced staff. These are usually considered as force majeure. Some texts classify risks as ‘epistemic’ and ‘aleoteric’; epistemic risks being those due to a lack of knowledge and aleoteric risks being due to natural variability. Unknown unknowns are clearly epistemic.
In some situations the term risk does not necessarily refer to the chance of bad consequences, it can also refer to the possibility of good consequences; therefore, it is important that a definition of risk must include some reference to this point. Risk and uncertainty have been defined as:
risk
exists when a decision is expressed in terms of a range of possible outcomes and when known probabilities can be attached to the outcomes;
uncertainty
exists when there is more than one possible outcome of a course of action but the probability of each outcome is not known (frequently termed estimating uncertainty).
A particular type of decision making is needed in risk management. Consider Figure 1.1 which compares the probability of occurrence of an event compared with its impact on the construction project. Events with a low impact are not serious and can be divided into the elements of trivial and expected. For the high impact and low probability, these events are a hazard which could arise but are too remote to be considered. For example, there is a finite probability that parts from an old satellite might re-enter the atmosphere and crash on any building project in the UK, but very few buildings need to be designed to withstand that event. In project management however, high impact risks should not be ignored even if their probability is low. Fallback and response plans should be put in place even if the financial impact is too large to be covered by contingencies. The use of risk management is to identify, assess and manage those events with both a high input and a high probability of occurrence.
Figure 1.1 Classification of risk sources.
Most commonly, the client, the project owner (e.g. companies, organisations, etc.) has an overall risk management strategy and policy included in the strategic documents and quality management system, see Figure 1.2. Main issues concerning project owner risk strategy are risk ownership (which party owns the risk; risk exposure and transfer) and risk financing (how to include and use budget risk allowance or contingency). The client's risk management policy includes the risk management procedures or guidelines, responsibilities and reporting.
Figure 1.2 Risk management strategy.
Both client (employer, promoter) and contractor are concerned with the magnitude and pattern of their investment and the associated risk. They desire to exert control over the activities which contribute to their investment. This type of risk is now covered by the term corporate and project governance (see Chapter 11).
There are two significant axioms of control: (1) control can be exercised only over future events; and (2) effective control necessitates prediction of the effects of change. The past is relevant only so far as past performance or events can influence our predictions of the future. The scope for control diminishes as the project proceeds. There are two key events at which control can be exercised: (1) sanction commitment to a project of particular characteristics; and (2) contract award commitment to contractors and major cost expenditure. It should be noted that there will also be opportunity to influence even if direct control cannot be exercised.
It follows that prior to these two commitments clients have great opportunity for control. They make decisions to define the organisation and procedures required for the execution of a project. These decisions affect the responsibilities of the parties; they influence the control of design, construction, commissioning, change and risk; hence they affect cost, time and quality.
Responsibility for uncontrollable risk should remain with the client, as risk should not be transferred to a party who cannot control or manage the risk and ultimately the client will only have to take action if the risk occurs.
The control of time cannot be effected in isolation from resources and costs. Project planning methods should be utilised to communicate to all parties in a project, to identify sequences of activities and to draw attention to potential problem areas. The successful realisation of a project will depend greatly on careful planning and continuous monitoring and updating. The activities of designers, manufacturers, suppliers, contractors and all their resources must be organised and integrated to meet the objectives set by the client and/or the contractor. In most cases the programme will form the basis of the plan.
Sequences of activities will be defined and linked on a timescale to ensure that priorities are identified and that efficient use is made of expensive and/or scarce resources. Remember, however, that because of the uncertainty it should be expected that the plan will change. It must therefore be updated quickly and regularly if it is to remain as a guide to the most efficient way of completing the project. The programme should therefore be simple, so that updating is straightforward and does not demand the feedback of large amounts of data, and flexible, so that all alternative courses of action are obvious.
The purposes of planning are therefore to persuade people to perform tasks before they delay the operations of other groups of people, and in such a sequence that the best use is made of available resources and to provide a framework for decision making in the event of change. It is difficult to enforce a plan which is conceived in isolation, and it is, therefore, essential to involve the individuals and organisations responsible for the activities or operations as the plan is developed.
In developing a plan which is to be used for purposes of control, it is vital to distinguish between different categories of change and to fully instigate the monitoring and formal aspect of the project. Typically, the main categories are: adapted, fixed (e.g. for mobilisation); time related (e.g. for resources and overheads); and quantity-proportional (e.g. for materials). Their relative importance will differ with the project and it is interesting to note the importance of time-related costs and the implications of delay in plant-intensive construction projects.
Project management information systems (PMISs) should forecast the outcome of a project in terms related to achievement of its objectives. Integrated cost models link time with money. They provide project managers with forecasts to completion in terms of cost, time resource usage and cash flow. Decisions about future actions can be made with the best available forecasts in these terms. Cost models also help to overcome an implementation gap between monitoring systems and the manager's action. Risk management software (RMS) is the term used to denote specialist software which can be used to apply one of the many risk assessment methodologies.
Project control and information systems should be conceived and adopted to suit the needs of a particular project. The project should not be forced to fit the control system; rather the control system should fit the project. Software needs to be selected with due regard to the resources that will be required to operate it and its data requirements.
All projects are subject to risk. The world is in a state of constant change and survival relies on the ability to adapt to changes. Unfortunately, many project managers have not yet realised that there is a need to include project risk as a key process.
It is a well known fact that managing risk has two major objectives: to avoid the downside risks; and to exploit opportunities. Experiences so far show that the risk avoidance part of the risk management philosophy has attracted too much management attention, while the potential opportunities have been neglected.
The risk avoidance strategy helps to secure project objectives, which for many organisations is a giant step ahead and may be the single biggest opportunity. However, the major leaps in project cost and time reduction are results of innovative thinking with focus on exploring opportunities by challenging the risks. The trend today is to establish ambitious goals, to seek for new technological solutions and concepts and to look for effective ways of organising and managing projects.
The difference between project success and disaster is of course more complex than managing or not managing the risk but it appears that the number of successful projects would have been far higher if more companies had included risk as an integral part of their project management.
The following chapters present a framework against which a practicable and rational approach to the process of managing risk in construction projects can be developed.
Projects do not exist in isolation. They are initiated to fulfil a need or exploit an opportunity. The needs and opportunities exist before the project. They are products of the world at large. Projects are therefore heavily influenced by external factors and they also influence the world outside them to an extent that is largely, but not entirely, dependent upon the size of the project. These external factors can be termed the project environment, other names are also given to it such as the project world, and this is the focus of this chapter.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!