0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Sachliteratur, Reportagen, Biografien
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Matthew Arnold," George Saintsbury delivers a profound and insightful examination of one of the most significant figures of Victorian literature. This work combines biographical elements with a critical analysis of Arnold's poetic and critical contributions, employing a clear and articulate literary style that invites readers into the complexities of Arnold's thought. Saintsbury contextualizes Arnold within the broader literary landscape of the time, addressing themes such as culture, society, and the tension between tradition and modernity, thus offering a comprehensive portrait of Arnold's enduring legacy. Saintsbury himself was a prominent literary critic, scholar, and historian whose extensive knowledge of the English literary canon greatly influenced his perspective on Arnold. His background in classical literature and deep understanding of the Victorian milieu enabled him to engage with Arnold's works on a level that transcends mere critique. This biographical approach reflects his admiration for Arnold's roles as both poet and social critic, revealing how his own experiences shaped his readings and interpretations. This book is essential for anyone interested in the interplay of poetry and social commentary in the 19th century, making it a valuable resource for students and enthusiasts alike. Saintsbury's careful analysis not only illuminates Arnold's texts but also enhances the reader's appreciation of the cultural currents that shaped them. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
Matthew Arnold
Table of Contents
Introduction
Balancing the claims of poetic ideal and public responsibility, George Saintsbury’s study of Matthew Arnold traces how a singular Victorian voice sought standards of taste, judgment, and culture amid the pressures of a rapidly changing age.
Matthew Arnold by George Saintsbury is a work of literary criticism and biographical interpretation focused on one of the central figures of Victorian letters. Saintsbury, a prominent British critic and historian of literature, writes with the authority of a scholar steeped in nineteenth-century traditions and debates. The book examines Arnold’s poetry and prose within the broader intellectual context of his time, addressing how his career unfolded against the background of modern industrial society and shifting moral certainties. First published around the turn of the twentieth century, the study offers a period-informed appraisal that remains attentive to both writer and era.
Readers encounter a concise, judicious portrait that combines narrative overview with evaluative criticism. Saintsbury’s voice is measured and exacting, favoring clarity over ornament, and his method proceeds by setting Arnold’s major achievements against the challenges they address. Without overwhelming detail, he traces the contours of Arnold’s development, indicating how the poetry and the criticism speak to each other. The mood is reflective rather than polemical, and the style aims for balance: sympathetic but unsentimental, probing yet accessible. The result is an invitation to understand Arnold’s work as a coherent response to the aesthetic and ethical questions of his century.
Saintsbury situates Arnold among the leading writers and thinkers of Victorian Britain, outlining the pressures that shaped his art and his critical outlook. He considers how Arnold’s poetic craft seeks lucidity and restraint, and how his prose engages questions of culture, belief, and the responsibilities of criticism. The study’s architecture is straightforward: establish the lineaments of Arnold’s career, assess representative poems and essays, and take stock of his position in English letters. Saintsbury’s judgments are anchored in close attention to style, tone, and intellectual temper, allowing readers to see not just what Arnold wrote, but why it mattered.
Central themes emerge with clarity: the relation between classical measure and modern restlessness; the role of criticism in clarifying standards; and the search for moral and aesthetic coherence in an unsettled society. Saintsbury emphasizes Arnold’s commitment to discipline and form, but also recognizes the strain of modern feeling that runs through his work. The study underscores how Arnold’s criticism aspires to diagnose cultural confusions and to propose humane criteria for taste and conduct. Without reducing complexities to formula, Saintsbury presents Arnold’s oeuvre as a sustained effort to reconcile inward aspiration with public discourse.
For contemporary readers, this study offers more than historical orientation; it illuminates perennial questions about education, culture, and the public value of literature. Saintsbury’s analysis models a critical practice that is rigorous without pedantry and fair without indifference, suggesting how standards can be argued for without dogmatism. In an age of accelerating information and contested values, his account of Arnold’s steadying emphasis on clarity, proportion, and ethical seriousness feels newly pertinent. The book invites reflection on how criticism can refine judgment, how poetry can articulate a civilization’s anxieties, and how both may help cultivate common ground.
Approached as an introduction or as a companion to deeper study, Matthew Arnold by George Saintsbury offers an elegant, compact map to a major Victorian career. It guides readers to the points where Arnold’s poetry, prose, and historical moment intersect, and it does so with care for context and precision of assessment. Those seeking orientation will find a clear path into Arnold’s ideas and artistry; those returning to him will find a steady, informed interlocutor. In presenting a life’s work as an intelligible whole, Saintsbury helps readers see why Arnold continues to matter and how to read him well.
Synopsis
George Saintsbury’s Matthew Arnold offers a compact literary biography and critical survey of Arnold’s work, arranged to move from life to poetry, prose, and final estimate. Saintsbury frames Arnold as a central Victorian figure whose double career—in public service and letters—shaped both his themes and methods. The book identifies Arnold’s classical orientation, moral temper, and stylistic restraint as unifying features across genres. It outlines the evolution of his reputation, notes the controversies his criticism and religious writings stirred, and closes by situating his legacy among English poets and critics. Throughout, Saintsbury emphasizes textual particulars, context, and chronology, keeping summary and assessment closely linked.
The study begins with Arnold’s family background and education, marking the influence of his father, Dr. Thomas Arnold of Rugby, and the intellectual climate of Oxford. Saintsbury charts Arnold’s early posts, including his work as private secretary and his long tenure as an Inspector of Schools, which provided both steady livelihood and constant engagement with educational realities. The narrative records his marriage, travels, friendships, and public lectures, presenting a steady, undramatic life punctuated by literary milestones. This biographical foundation underscores Arnold’s habit of balancing administrative duty with artistic production, a balance that, in Saintsbury’s account, informs the measured cadence and reflective intelligence characteristic of both his verse and prose.
Turning to the poetry, Saintsbury first examines the early volumes, noting the classical leanings and the preference for intellectual poise over effusive display. He recounts the appearance of The Strayed Reveller and Other Poems, the composition and temporary withdrawal of Empedocles on Etna, and the 1853 Poems with its influential preface. That preface articulates Arnold’s view of poetry as a serious criticism of life, governed by high standards drawn from the Greeks. Saintsbury highlights Arnold’s pruning instinct—his willingness to remove or recast pieces—to illustrate the poet’s fastidiousness about tone, structure, and subject, and to frame later developments in narrative and lyrical modes.
Saintsbury then analyzes the narrative and dramatic experiments, including Sohrab and Rustum, Balder Dead, Tristram and Iseult, and the Greek-model tragedy Merope. He attends to their sources, architectonics, and diction, emphasizing Arnold’s pursuit of epic clarity and sculptural outline. The discussion addresses the poet’s management of scene and speech, the preference for noble restraint over theatrical fervor, and the adaptation of classical procedure to modern English. Saintsbury outlines where the narrative ambition achieves breadth and elevation, where the dramatic impulse remains controlled rather than eruptive, and how these works establish a distinctive register that mediates romantic material through a disciplined, Hellenic temper.
The account turns to the lyrics and meditative pieces that formed Arnold’s most persistent appeal. Saintsbury groups poems such as The Scholar-Gipsy, Thyrsis, Dover Beach, Stanzas from the Grande Chartreuse, and select elegies, reading them as reflections on modern disquiet, the value of culture, and the solace of nature and friendship. He comments on their cadence, use of refrain, and careful moderation of emotion, observing how landscape is used to frame ethical and intellectual concern. Without probing biographical privacy, he connects the poems’ mood to Arnold’s public responsibilities and reflective habits, stressing the consistent preference for lucidity, exact phrase, and a musical yet chastened movement.
From poetry, the book shifts to prose criticism, beginning with the 1853 preface and moving to Essays in Criticism and the Homer lectures. Saintsbury summarizes Arnold’s argument for disinterestedness, his call for comparison with the best that has been thought and written, and the touchstone procedure for evaluating poetic excellence. He outlines Arnold’s judgments on classical and English authors, the debate over English hexameters, and the insistence on clarity and urbanity as critical virtues. The exposition keeps to Arnold’s terms and examples, emphasizing method rather than controversy, and shows how these essays aimed to reform taste, discipline enthusiasm, and create a broader standard of literary culture.
Saintsbury next treats the social and cultural criticism, especially Culture and Anarchy, where Arnold defines culture as a pursuit of perfection and sets Hellenism alongside Hebraism as complementary impulses. The summary notes his typology of classes, critique of Philistinism, and advocacy for state-guided educational improvement. Saintsbury presents these arguments in their historical frame, relating them to the reform debates and the inspector’s daily observations. He records the brisk reception and persistent misreadings the book attracted while stressing its program: to refine public spirit, correct narrowness, and elevate manners and thought by standards external to party or sect.
The religious writings occupy a separate stage. Saintsbury recounts St. Paul and Protestantism, Literature and Dogma, God and the Bible, and later essays, stressing Arnold’s literary approach to Scripture and his proposal to separate enduring moral power from contested dogma. The narrative summarizes key terms, methods of biblical interpretation, and the aim to reconcile modern criticism with the needs of conduct and feeling. Reception is sketched: initial alarms, later influence, and continuing debate. Saintsbury keeps evaluation succinct, noting the coherence with Arnold’s broader cultural ideal and the consistency of tone—urbane, reforming, and intent on clarity amid theological contention.
Concluding, Saintsbury brings life, poetry, and prose into a single estimate. He assigns Arnold an enduring place as a poet of lucid melancholy and as a critic who systematized standards for English taste. The book notes limits of range alongside exemplary finish, balancing narrative ambition with lyric mastery, and judgment with moderation. It marks the harmonies between his civil service, ethical preoccupations, and stylistic self-command. The final impression is of a writer advancing measure and culture in a bustling age, leaving methods and touchstones that persisted in classrooms and criticism, and poems whose poise and purity remained exemplary for later readers and writers.
Historical Context
George Saintsbury’s Matthew Arnold (published by William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh and London, 1899) surveys a life lived across the high Victorian decades, c. 1822–1888, from Rugby and Oxford to London and the Continent. The setting is Britain at the height of industrialization and imperial reach, with railways, factories, and vast cities reshaping society. The political scene runs from the post-Reform Act era into mass democratic stirrings of the 1860s–80s. Religious controversy, public education, and administrative reform dominate civic debate. Saintsbury writes at the fin de siècle, when Arnold’s generation had just passed, assessing his subject’s career within the institutions—schools, churches, civil service—through which Victorian Britain refashioned itself.
The expansion of state-supervised elementary education in England formed a decisive historical frame for Arnold’s career. Appointed one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Schools in 1851 under the Committee of Council on Education, he traversed industrial and rural districts, reporting on conditions in classrooms shaped by rapid urban growth. The Royal Commission on the State of Popular Education (the Newcastle Commission), established in 1858 under the 5th Duke of Newcastle, reported in 1861 on attendance, curriculum, and funding. Saintsbury situates Arnold amid this machinery of government inquiry, showing how the inspector’s daily encounters with overburdened teachers and uneven local provision forged the social concerns that pervade his essays.
The Revised Code of 1862, driven by Robert Lowe (later Viscount Sherbrooke) as Vice-President of the Council, introduced “payment by results,” tying grants to pupils’ performance in the “three Rs” (reading, writing, arithmetic) across standardized levels. This administrative turn privileged measurable outputs and economy, but it narrowed curricula and pressured schools to teach to tests. Arnold’s official Reports criticized the mechanical pedagogy it encouraged and the moral cost of reducing culture to metrics. Saintsbury traces these debates, noting how the Code reshaped classrooms and public finances, and how Arnold’s resistance—grounded in witnessed fact—fed the ethical and civic arguments that later crystallized in his broader social criticism.
Legislation in 1870–1880 entrenched national schooling and deepened the issues Arnold confronted. W. E. Forster’s Elementary Education Act (1870) created elected school boards and aimed to fill gaps in provision; the Sandon Act (1876) strengthened attendance requirements; and A. J. Mundella’s Act (1880) made attendance effectively compulsory. Scotland had moved with the 1872 Education (Scotland) Act. Arnold’s comparative missions yielded The Popular Education of France (1861) and Schools and Universities on the Continent (1868), advocating a humane, continental model of state culture. Saintsbury links these statutes and reports to Arnold’s mature social vision, arguing that the inspectorate’s realities supplied the empirical ground of his program for national improvement.
The constitutional upheavals surrounding the Second Reform Act (1867) provided a vivid political backdrop. Mass demonstrations by the Reform League culminated in the Hyde Park disturbances of 23 July 1866, when crowds tore down railings after a prohibited meeting, and further rallies in 1867 pressed the case. Benjamin Disraeli’s Act of 1867 roughly doubled the urban male electorate. Arnold’s Culture and Anarchy (1869) arose from this climate of agitation, urging “sweetness and light” and a state that could harmonize classes. Saintsbury shows how specific episodes—Hyde Park’s broken fences and the new voter rolls—shaped Arnold’s diagnosis of turbulence, materialism, and the need for a cultivated administrative center.
Religious contention from the 1830s to the 1870s—the Oxford Movement and its aftermath—formed another decisive context. John Keble’s Assize Sermon (1833) and the Tracts for the Times led by John Henry Newman and E. B. Pusey pressed for Catholic continuity in the Church of England. Against this, Thomas Arnold of Rugby (1828–1842), Matthew’s father, embodied Broad Church reform and moral earnestness in schooling. The University Tests Act (1871) later removed Anglican tests at Oxford and Cambridge. Saintsbury ties these controversies to Matthew Arnold’s St. Paul and Protestantism (1870), Literature and Dogma (1873), and God and the Bible (1875), where ecclesiastical conflict is recast as a social problem requiring rational, state-mediated accommodation.
Continental war and revolution—especially 1870–1871—shaped Arnold’s comparative outlook. The Franco-Prussian War saw France’s defeat at Sedan (1 September 1870), the siege of Paris (1870–1871), and the Paris Commune (March–May 1871), ending with the “Semaine sanglante.” Britain, officially neutral, watched anxiously. Arnold, long engaged with French administration and esprit, used Friendship’s Garland (1871) to comment on nationalism, militarism, and English complacency in the face of continental discipline. Saintsbury highlights how these events affirmed Arnold’s admiration for ordered civic culture and administrative competence, contrasting improvised English practices with centralized French models, and reinforcing the book’s portrayal of Arnold as a diagnostician of national character under modern stress.
Saintsbury’s study doubles as a social and political critique by presenting Arnold’s life as evidence for failures and possibilities in Victorian governance. The book exposes the distortions of “payment by results,” the dangers of mass politics untethered from civic education, and the strain of confessional conflict on national cohesion. By following an inspector through schools, riots, and religious controversies, it scrutinizes class divides between metropolitan elites, provincial middle classes, and the urban poor. It indicts bureaucratic parsimony and partisan improvisation, while advocating a culturally informed state capable of reconciling liberty with order. Thus the work criticizes the era’s materialism and elevates public culture as a remedy.
Matthew Arnold
Preface.
Mr. Matthew Arnold, like other good men of our times, disliked the idea of being made the subject of a regular biography; and the only official and authoritative sources of information as to the details of his life are the Letters published by his family, under the editorship of Mr G.W.E. Russell (2 vols., London, 1895)[1]. To these, therefore, it seems to be a duty to confine oneself, as far as such details are concerned, save as regards a very few additional facts which are public property. But very few more facts can really be wanted except by curiosity; for in the life of no recent person of distinction did things literary play so large a part as in Mr Arnold’s: of no one could it be said with so much truth that, family affections and necessary avocations apart, he was totus in illis[2]. And these things we have in abundance.[2] If the following pages seem to discuss them too minutely, it can only be pleaded that those to whom it seems so are hardly in sympathy with Matthew Arnold himself. And if the discussion seems to any one too often to take the form of a critical examination, let him remember Mr. Arnold’s own words in comparing the treatment of Milton by Macaulay and by M. Scherer:—
“Whoever comes to the Essay on Milton with the desire to get at the real truth about Milton, whether as a man or a poet, will feel that the essay in nowise helps him. A reader who only wants rhetoric, a reader who wants a panegyric on Milton, a panegyric on the Puritans, will find what he wants. A reader who wants criticism will be disappointed[1q].”
I have endeavoured, in dealing with the master of all English critics in the latter half of the nineteenth century, to “help the reader who wants criticism.”
