139,99 €
The exponential digitization of medical data has led to a transformation of the practice of medicine. This change notably raises a new complexity of issues surrounding health IT. The proper use of these communication tools, such as telemedicine, e-health, m-health the big medical data, should improve the quality of monitoring and care of patients for an information system to "human face".
Faced with these challenges, the author analyses in an ethical angle the patient-physician relationship, sharing, transmission and storage of medical information, setting pins to an ethic for the digitization of medical information. Drawing on good practice recommendations closely associated with values, this model is developing tools for reflection and present the keys to understanding the decision-making issues that reflect both the technological constraints and the complex nature of human reality in medicine .
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 465
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
Cover
Title
Copyright
Introduction
I.1. Questions on which our study is based
I.2. Objectives and contributions of this book
I.3. Toward medical ethics
1: The Emergence of Medical Information in the Face of Personal and Societal Ethical Challenges
1.1. An information-consuming society
1.2. e-Health, m-health, the Quantified Self and Big Data
1.3. Medical secrecy in the face of the computerization of healthcare data
1.4. Cultural evolution of mentalities surrounding legitimacy of information
1.5. Processing of personal data in law
2: Ethical Modeling: From the Design to the Use of an Information System
2.1. Info-ethics: data on practical wisdom
2.2. Identification of method used to develop the ethical analysis model
2.3. Development of the ethical analysis space
2.4. Presentation of the ethical model
3: Uses of This Ethical Model
3.1. Implementing the ethical model
3.2. Presentation of the study’s questionnaires
3.3. Necessary environmental changes for healthcare information systems: recommendations and actions
3.4. Creating an ethical charter on the “ideal” computational tool for a healthcare establishment
4: Ethics-Oriented Personalized Medicine
4.1. The evolution of society toward an ethical ideal based on information
4.2. The doctor–patient–IS triangulation
4.3. Ethical use of an information system in healthcare
4.4. Ethics-oriented personalized medicine
4.5. Tool for the establishment and constant improvement of information systems for ethical practice in hospitals
Conclusions
Appendix 1: Classification of the Justifications in terms of the Different Real-world Environmental Parameters and Fundamental Ethical Principles pertaining to the Major Objectives of an IS in Healthcare
Appendix 2: Questionnaire 1: Designed to Analyze the Perception of Actors in Oncology about the Primary Objectives of an IS in Healthcare
Appendix 3: Questionnaire 1′: Designed to Analyze Healthcare Users’ Perceptions of the Main Objectives of an IS in Healthcare
Appendix 4: Questionnaire 2: Designed to Study the Realization and Characteristics of the IS Tool, to be used by the Designer of the IS and to the “Internal” Users
Appendix 5: Questionnaire 3: Designed to Analyze the Methods and Tools Put in Place to Enable the IS to Work
Appendix 6: Environmental Parameters of the Knowledge Pyramid
Bibliography
Index
End User License Agreement
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
2: Ethical Modeling: From the Design to the Use of an Information System
Table 2.1. Support on which analysis questionnaires are based
Table 2.2. Model of ethical analysis
Table 2.3. Interactions between the dimensions of ethical modeling
Table 2.4. Environmental parameters of the infosphere
Table 2.5. Structuring of pyramid of knowledge
3: Uses of This Ethical Model
Table 3.1. Justifications of the purposes, fundamental principles and underlying social values to the main aims of a healthcare information system
Table 3.2. Justifications of the limitations, fundamental principles and underlying social values of the main aims of a healthcare information system
Table 3.3. Distribution of the justification in the ethical cube of acceptable contingency
Table 3.4. Proportion of real environmental parameters within the fundamental ethical principles
Table 3.5. Advantages and disadvantages of single- or multi-developer approaches
Table 3.6. Recommendations for the structural and technological domain
Table 3.7. Recommendations for the strategic and methodological domain
Table 3.8. Recommendations for the organizational and legislative domain
Table 3.9. Recommendations for the relational and cultural domain
Table 3.10. Ethical charter on the aims surrounding the creation, implementation and use of a healthcare information system
4: Ethics-Oriented Personalized Medicine
Table 4.1. Components characterizing the environment surrounding knowledge
Table 4.2. Structure of knowledge pyramid
Table 4.3. Strategic deployment: giving meaning and goals
Table 4.4. Structure and composition of the three dashboards
Table 4.5. Representation of the strategic dashboard – visualization. For a color version of the table, see www.iste.co.uk/beranger/ethics.com
Table 4.6. Representation of the “tactical” dashboard – intervention. For a color version of the table, see www.iste.co.uk/beranger/ethics.com
Table 4.7. Representation of operational dashboard – control. For a color version of the table, see www.iste.co.uk/beranger/ethics.com
Table 4.8. Intrahospital coordination and strategic planning
Appendix 1: Classification of the Justifications in terms of the Different Real-world Environmental Parameters and Fundamental Ethical Principles pertaining to the Major Objectives of an IS in Healthcare
Table A1.1. Justifications of the purposes of the major objectives of an IS in healthcare in terms of the real-world environmental parameters
Table A1.2. Justifications of the limitations of the major objectives of an IS in healthcare in terms of the real-world environmental parameters
Appendix 2: Questionnaire 1: Designed to Analyze the Perception of Actors in Oncology about the Primary Objectives of an IS in Healthcare
Table A2.1. Questionnaire 1, designed to analyze the perception of actors in oncology about the primary objectives of an IS in healthcare
Appendix 3: Questionnaire 1′: Designed to Analyze Healthcare Users’ Perceptions of the Main Objectives of an IS in Healthcare
Table A3.1. Questionnaire 1′, designed to analyze healthcare users’ perceptions of the main objectives of an IS in healthcare
Appendix 4: Questionnaire 2: Designed to Study the Realization and Characteristics of the IS Tool, to be used by the Designer of the IS and to the “Internal” Users
Table A4.1. Questionnaire 2, designed to study the realization and characteristics of the IS tool, to be used by the designer of the IS and the “internal” users
Appendix 5: Questionnaire 3: Designed to Analyze the Methods and Tools Put in Place to Enable the IS to Work
Table A5.1. Questionnaire 3, designed to analyze the methods and tools put in place to enable the IS to work
Appendix 6: Environmental Parameters of the Knowledge Pyramid
Table A6.1. Environmental parameters of info-ethics
Table A6.2. Environmental parameters of the computosphere
2: Ethical Modeling: From the Design to the Use of an Information System
Figure 2.1. Structural analogy between genetics and information
Figure 2.2. Information systems and knowledge
Figure 2.3. Developed information systems and knowledge
Figure 2.4. Construction of an ethical event
Figure 2.5. Ethical space
Figure 2.6. Informative plan
Figure 2.7. Ethical analysis space
Figure 2.8. Ethical cube of an accepted contingency
Figure 2.9. Conversion of data into practical wisdom in an ethical analysis space in the infosphere
Figure 2.10. Nonaka’s model of organizational learning
Figure 2.11. Ethical modeling of information system in the doctor–patient relationship. For a color version of the figure, see www.iste.co.uk/beranger/ethics.com
Figure 2.12. Ethical modeling of information system in the doctor–patient relationship
Figure 2.13. Transformation from alpha to omega via the neo-Platonic systemic ethical prism
Figure 2.14. Flow of quantity of information from A to Ω
Figure 2.15. Process of creation of practical wisdom via organizational intelligence
Figure 2.16. Technico-ethical regulation of data
3: Uses of This Ethical Model
Figure 3.1. Geometric representations integrated within the sketch of the Vitruvian Man. For a color version of the figure, see www.iste.co.uk/beranger/ethics.zip
Figure 3.2. Implementation structure of an information system
Figure 3.3. Forces that characterize organization
4: Ethics-Oriented Personalized Medicine
Figure 4.1. Evolution of an information society using NICT
Figure 4.2. Analysis of the knowledge pyramid via ethical modeling
Figure 4.3. Triangulation of the doctor–patient–IS relationship
Figure 4.4. Maxwell’s three-dimensional model
Figure 4.5. Use of dashboards in the hospital organogram
Cover
Contents
ii
iii
iv
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii
xiv
xv
xvi
xvii
xviii
xix
xx
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
xxv
xxvi
xxvii
xxviii
xxix
xxx
xxxi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
229
230
231
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
“Whatever, in the course of my practice, I may see or hear (even when not invited), whatever I may happen to obtain knowledge of, if it be not proper to repeat it, I will keep sacred and secret within my own breast.”
Hippocratic Oath
“I hope the principles here laid down will afford some light either to this or some truer method of philosophy.”
Isaac Newton
Jérôme Béranger
Series EditorBruno Salgues
First published 2015 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:
ISTE Ltd27-37 St George’s RoadLondon SW19 4EUUK
www.iste.co.uk
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River StreetHoboken, NJ 07030USA
www.wiley.com
© ISTE Ltd 2015The rights of Jérôme Béranger to be identified as the author of this work have been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2015942609
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication DataA CIP record for this book is available from the British LibraryISBN 978-1-84821-859-8
The past several years have been a turbulent time for the French healthcare system. With an institutional environment in the midst of dramatic change, patient care is in a perpetual state of transformation under the effects of factors such as evolving healthcare needs and emergence of new technologies playing an increasingly large role in cost-saving policy.
Collectively, hospital establishments represent assets that are important as much for our healthcare system as for the social role they play. However, they are currently facing significant concerns such as demographic challenges; evolving management tasks, which notably include the hyper-specialization of certain techniques; changing financial regulations with the introduction of fee-for-service practices; quality of services and reception; continuity of the care process; human and organizational management; and obligation to inform, all against a background of budgetary restriction.
This period has been conducive to value conflicts, divergences of opinion and opposing points of view, and even clashes, notably mainly concerning the development of healthcare expenditure control policies, with care opposing cost, providers opposing economists or managers, and the right to individual healthcare opposing the obligation of solidarity and efficiency. In the resulting ethical debates, tensions have appeared between the morals of conviction and the morals of individual and collective responsibility, and between clinical medicine and public healthcare, contributing to strategic and organizational dysfunction in the healthcare sector.
To all this, we can add revolutionary developments in information technology, with new communication devices such as the Internet, e-health, m-health, medical big data, and the complexity of internal and external transmission, notably in hospitals, due to the existence of medical information carrier systems (hospital information system (HIS), radiology information system, personal medical file (PMF), confidential physician cancer reporting, telemedicine, intranet networks, etc.). Currently, “data intelligence” appears to be the strategic response for the management of the use and deviance of the latter. Consequently, exploitation of big data is a sensitive subject, as it directly touches the private life of everyone. The number of situations in which difficult problems of strategic choice are faced in matters of personal data management grows larger every day. The increasing digitalization of digital data, the ever-growing capacity to store digital data and the resulting accumulation of information of every type have given rise to certain fears and uncertainties due to their multiple (and complex) usages, their impacts on highly diverse populations, which are difficult to measure, and the fact that information is sometimes impossible to control.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
