Mid-Latitude Atmospheric Dynamics - Jonathan E. Martin - E-Book

Mid-Latitude Atmospheric Dynamics E-Book

Jonathan E. Martin

0,0
60,99 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.

Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

This exciting text provides a mathematically rigorous yet accessible textbook that is primarily aimed at atmospheric science majors. Its accessibility is due to the texts emphasis on conceptual understanding.

The first five chapters constitute a companion text to introductory courses covering the dynamics of the mid-latitude atmosphere. The final four chapters constitute a more advanced course, and provide insights into the diagnostic power of the quasi-geostrophic approximation of the equations outlined in the previous chapters, the meso-scale dynamics of thefrontal zone, the alternative PV perspective for cyclone interpretation, and the dynamics of the life-cycle of mid-latitude cyclones.

  • Written in a clear and accessible style
  • Features real weather examples and global case studies
  • Each chapter sets out clear learning objectives and tests students’ knowledge with concluding questions and answers

A Solutions Manual is also available for this textbook on the Instructor Companion Site www.wileyeurope.com/college/martin.

 

“…a student-friendly yet rigorous textbook that accomplishes what no other textbook has done before… I highly recommend this textbook. For instructors, this is a great book if they don’t have their own class notes – one can teach straight from the book. And for students, this is a great book if they don’t take good class notes – one can learn straight from the book. This is a rare attribute of advanced textbooks.”

 

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS), 2008

 

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern

Seitenzahl: 478

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



Contents

Preface

Acknowledgments

1  Introduction and Review of Mathematical Tools

Objectives

1.1  Fluids and the nature of fluid dynamics

1.2  Review of useful mathematical tools

1.3  Estimating with scale analysis

1.4  Basic kinematics of fluids

1.5  Mensuration

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

2  Fundamental and Apparent Forces

Objectives

2.1  The fundamental forces

2.2  Apparent forces

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

3  Mass, Momentum, and Energy: The Fundamental Quantities of the Physical World

Objectives

3.1  Mass in the Atmosphere

3.2  Conservation of momentum: The equations of motion

3.3  Conservation of energy: The energy equation

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

4  Applications of the Equations of Motion

Objectives

4.1  Pressure as a vertical coordinate

4.2  Potential temperature as a vertical coordinate

4.3  The thermal wind balance

4.4  Natural coordinates and balanced flows

4.5  The relationship between trajectories and streamlines

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

5  Circulation, Vorticity, and Divergence

Objectives

5.1  The Circulation theorem and its physical interpretation

5.2  Vorticity and potential vorticity

5.3  The relationship between vorticity and divergence

5.4  The quasi-geostrophic system of equations

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

6  The Diagnosis of Mid-Latitude Synoptic-Scale Vertical Motions

Objectives

6.1  The nature of the ageostrophic wind: Isolating the acceleration vector

6.2  The Sutcliffe development theorem

6.3  The quasi-geostrophic omega equation

6.4  The -vector

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

7  The Vertical Circulation at Fronts

Objectives

7.1  The structural and dynamical characteristics of mid-latitude fronts

7.2  Frontogenesis and vertical motions

7.3  The semi-geostrophic equations

7.4  Upper-level frontogenesis

7.5  Precipitation processes at fronts

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

8  Dynamical Aspects of the Life Cycle of the Mid-Latitude Cyclone

Objectives

8.1  Introduction: The polar front theory of cyclones

8.2  Basic structural and energetic characteristics of the cyclone

8.3  The cyclogenesis stage: The QG tendency equation perspective

8.4  The cyclogenesis stage: The QG omega equation perspective

8.5  The cyclogenetic influence of diabatic processes: Explosive cyclogenesis

8.6  The post-mature stage: Characteristic thermal structure

8.7  The post-mature stage: The QG dynamics of the occluded quadrant

8.8  The Decay Stage

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

9  Potential Vorticity and Applications to Mid-Latitude Weather Systems

Objectives

9.1  Potential vorticity and isentropic divergence

9.2  Characteristics of a positive PV anomaly

9.3  Cyclogenesis from the PV perspective

9.4  The influence of diabatic heating on PV

9.5  Additional applications of the PV perspective

Selected references

Problems

Solutions

Appendix A: Virtual Temperature

Bibliography

Index

Copyright © 2006    

John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester,West Sussex PO19 8SQ, EnglandTelephone (+44) 1243 779777

Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): [email protected] our Home Page on www.wileyeurope.com or www.wiley.com

All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (+44) 1243 770620.

Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The Publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.

This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Other Wiley Editorial Offices

John Wiley & Sons Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA

Jossey-Bass, 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741, USA

Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Boschstr. 12, D-69469 Weinheim, Germany

John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd, 33 Park Road, Milton, Queensland 4064, Australia

John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, 2 Clementi Loop #02-01, Jin Xing Distripark, Singapore 129809

John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd, 22 Worcester Road, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada M9W 1L1

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.

Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

Martin, Jonathan E.Mid-latitude atmospheric dynamics : a first cource / Jonathan E. Martin.p.  cm.Includes bibliographical references and index.ISBN 13: 978-0-470-86464-7 (acid-free paper)ISBN 10: 0-470-86464-8 (acid-free paper)ISBN 13: 978-0-470-86465-4 (pbk. : acid-free paper)ISBN 10: 0-470-86465-6 (pbk. : acid-free paper)1. Dynamic meteorology. 2. Middle atmosphere. I. Title.QC880.M36 2006551.5—dc222005036659

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN 13 978-0-470-86464-7 (HB)ISBN 10 0-470-86464-8 (HB)

ISBN 13 978-0-470-86465-4 (PB)ISBN 10 0-470-86465-6 (PB)

Preface

Almost no one bears the ceaseless variability of the mid-latitude atmosphere without a firm opinion and at least some degree of interest. The parade of weather systems that are continuously developed and extinguished over this part of the globe ensures that its denizens never need to wait long for unmistakable, and sometimes dramatic, changes in the local weather. For the physical scientist with an interest in (or, as is most often the case for us, the captivated, a fascination with) the weather, the unsurprising, yet still remarkable, fact is that this variability is governed by the basic laws of physics first articulated by Newton centuries ago. The exact manner by which those laws are brought to bear upon an analysis of the dynamics of the atmospheric fluid has, especially in the last 100 years, become a separate branch of physics. This book is dedicated to providing an introduction to the physical and mathematical description of mid-latitude atmospheric dynamics accessible to any student possessing a solid background in classical physics and a working knowledge of calculus.

When one begins to wade through the average textbook, one often gets the sense that the author has poured everything he/she knows into the text without regard for whether it is all necessary to accomplish the educational goals of the book. My many years of teaching this material to hundreds of students have provided me with two main motivations for writing this textbook. First, students have invariably complained that the available textbooks are difficult to employ as study tools, often skipping steps in mathematical derivations and thus, on occasion, contributing more to frustration than to edification. They often wonder how the subject matter can seem so clear in lectures and then so confusing that night in the library. Second, there is no other currently available text that serves as a concise primer in the application of elementary dynamics to the central problems of modern synoptic–dynamic meteorology: the diagnosis of vertical motion, fronts and frontogenesis, and the dynamics of the cyclone life cycle from both the ω-centric and potential vorticity perspectives.

In this book I have attempted to remedy both of these shortcomings by presenting an introduction to atmospheric dynamics and its application to the understanding of mid-latitude weather systems in a penetrating conceptual and detailed mathematical fashion. The conversational tone of the book is meant to render its reading akin to attending a lecture given by someone who is profoundly excited by the subject matter. It is hoped that this tone will increase the likelihood that the book will serve as a genuine study guide for students as they navigate through a first course in this subject.

The first five chapters of the book are specifically targeted at junior-level undergraduates who are taking a first course in atmospheric dynamics. Chapter 1 provides a review of relevant mathematical tools while Chapter 2 considers the fundamental and apparent forces at work on a rotating Earth. Chapter 3 examines the fundamental conservation laws of mass, momentum, and energy producing, along the way, the continuity equation, the equations of motion, and the energy equation. Once developed, the equations of motion are simplified in Chapter 4 through a variety of approximations thus lending insight into basic flow characteristics of the mid-latitude atmosphere. The relationship between circulation, vorticity, and divergence in fluids is examined in Chapter 5 where the quasi-geostrophic system of equations is also introduced.

The last four chapters are targeted toward those students who might subsequently take a course in synoptic–dynamic meteorology in which a significant laboratory component would be a necessary complement. The diagnosis of vertical motions is undertaken in Chapter 6. The meso-synoptic dynamics of the frontal zones that characterize mid-latitude cyclones are considered in Chapter 7 where the examination of frontogenesis and its relationship to transverse vertical circulations is presented in both the quasi- and semi-geostrophic frameworks. Chapter 8 explores the dynamics of the life cycle of mid-latitude cyclones, thus providing a particularly relevant focus for synthesis of the prior chapters. Finally, Chapter 9 provides an introduction to the use of potential vorticity diagnostics for examining the life cycle of mid-latitude cyclones. Much of the material comprising the text comes from years of lecture notes from three distinct courses in the Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Both components of the text would be suitably challenging to first-year graduate students with little prior background in meteorology or atmospheric dynamics.

Throughout the text, the emphasis is on conceptual understanding, the development of which for any given topic always precedes the application of mathematical formalism. I recognize that a level of intimacy with the mathematics is necessary but I am certain that it is not sufficient to produce a penetrating understanding of mid-latitude dynamics. Such understanding is, instead, the offspring of a marriage between a conceptual, intuitive sense of the physics of the phenomenon and the corresponding mathematical description of it. At the end of each chapter several problems, characterized by varying degrees of difficulty, are included to assist the student in reinforcing knowledge of the subject matter and in developing solid problem-solving skills. Solutions to selected problems are included at the end of the chapters as well. Complete solutions to all problems are included in a separate Solution Manual available from the publisher. Also included at the end of each chapter is an annotated bibliography designed to point the interested student toward seminal or other sources. A more complete, though by no means exhaustive, bibliography can be found at the end of the book.

Acknowledgments

The completion of any significant project in one’s life is cause for celebration and reflection. For more than two and a half years the writing, illustrating, refining, and proofreading of this book has occupied me, at odd hours of the day, as a solo endeavor. For this reason, I bear the responsibility for any errors of fact or interpretation that might be found in the text. Of course, in reality, there is nothing “solo” about such an undertaking as a great number of people, some directly and some remotely, have contributed to this effort.

My parents, Leo and Joyce Martin, have provided me with love and constant support throughout my lifetime, affording me numerous opportunities for which I am profoundly grateful. My father’s infinite curiosity and creativity exposed me early and consistently to the joys of learning and exploring – especially on excursions to Nahant Beach on stormy autumn days and nighttime walks through the snowy woods of northeastern Massachusetts. These adventures instilled within me an enduring fascination with the atmosphere and the sensible weather it delivers.

I have had the good fortune of encountering a number of excellent teachers during my educationwhose dedication to clear explanation and deep understanding inspired me to pursue an academic life. Dr. Robert J. Sullivan, C. F. X., whose holistic approach to education provided all those with whom he came in contact an enduring model of excellence, is especially thanked. Dr. James T. Moore provided clear, dissected interpretations of complicated mathematical expressions in my first exposure to dynamic meteorology and thereby made a lasting impression, as did his colleague Dr. Albert Pallmann through his unbridled enthusiasm for inquiry. My dissertation advisor, Dr. Peter V. Hobbs, who passed away the very day the manuscript for this book was completed, exerted a profound influence on my scholarly development through his unwavering insistence on quality, and careful attention to precision in the spoken and written word. Many other teachers, colleagues and the scores of students I have known throughout the years are also gratefully acknowledged here.

Transformation of an illustrated manuscript into a book is not a trivial matter, and demands the efforts of experts. I am grateful to Ms. Lyn Roberts, Ms. Keily Larkins, Dr. Andrew Slade, Ms. Julie Ward, Ms. Lizzy Kingston, and Mr. Jon Peacock at Wiley who guided the book through to production, allowing me the freedom to write it, illustrate it and cover it my way. Thanks also to Mr. Neville Hankins who provided experienced and insightful copyediting to the project. Ms. Jean Phillips provided invaluable assistance in constructing the index.

Special mention is reserved for my family, who have faithfully supported both this enterprise and my sometimes flagging spirits. My daughter, Charlotte, and my son, Niall, have feigned excitement and interest at exactly the necessary moments and have, in other ways as well, provided me with the inspiration to soldier on. A father could not be prouder than I am of them. And finally, to my lovely wife Minh, a rock solid source of encouragement and support, who has lit my soul since the day we met; thank you for the magic and enduring warmth of your love in my life. When one feels so profound a gratitude as I do to these people, language fails to convey even its smallest fraction.

Jonathan E. Martin

Madison, Wisconsin

January 10, 2006

1

Introduction and Review of Mathematical Tools

Objectives

The Earth’s atmosphere is majestic in its beauty, awesome in its power, and complex in its behavior. From the smallest drops of dew or the tiniest snowflakes to the enormous circulation systems known as mid-latitude cyclones, all atmospheric phenomena are governed by physical laws. These laws can be written in the language of mathematics and, indeed, must be explored in that vernacular in order to develop a penetrating understanding of the behavior of the atmosphere. However, it is equally vital that a physical understanding accompany the mathematical formalism in this comprehensive development of insight. In principle, if one had a complete understanding of the behavior of seven basic variables describing the current state of the atmosphere (these will be called basic state variables in this book), namely u, v, and w (the components of the 3-D wind), T (the temperature), P (the pressure), ϕ (the geopotential), and q (the humidity), then one could describe the future state of the atmosphere by considering the equations that govern the evolution of each variable. It is not, however, immediately apparent what form these equations might take. In this book we will develop those equations in order to develop an understanding of the basic dynamics that govern the behavior of the atmosphere at middle latitudes on Earth.

In this chapter we lay the foundation for that development by reviewing a number of basic conceptual and mathematical tools that will prove invaluable in this task. We begin by assessing the troubling but useful notion that the air surrounding us can be considered a continuous fluid. We then proceed to a review of useful mathematical tools including vector calculus, the Taylor series expansion of a function, centered difference approximations, and the relationship between the Lagrangian and Eulerian derivatives. We then examine the notion of estimating using scale analysis and conclude the chapter by considering the basic kinematics of fluid flows.

1.1 Fluids and the Nature of Fluid Dynamics

Our experience with the natural world makes clear that physical objects manifest themselves in a variety of forms. Most of these physical objects (and every one of them with which we will concern ourselves in this book) have mass. The mass of an object can be thought of as a measure of its substance. The Earth’s atmosphere is one such object. It certainly has mass1 but differs from, say, a rock in that it is not solid. In fact, the Earth’s atmosphere is an example of a general category of substances known as fluids. A fluid can be colloquially defined as any substance that takes the shape of its container. Aside from the air around us, another fluid with which we are all familiar is water. A given mass of liquid water clearly adopts the shape of any container into which it is poured. The given mass of liquid water just mentioned, like the air around us, is actually composed of discrete molecules. In our subsequent discussions of the behavior of the atmospheric fluid, however, we need not concern ourselves with the details of the molecular structure of the air. We can instead treat the atmosphere as a continuous fluid entity, or continuum. Though the assumption of a continuous fluid seems to fly in the face of what we recognize as the underlying, discrete molecular reality, it is nonetheless an insightful concept. For instance, it is much more tenable to consider the flow of air we refer to as the wind to be a manifestation of the motion of such a continuous fluid. Any ‘point’ or ‘parcel’ to which we refer will be properly considered as a very small volume element that contains large numbers of molecules. The various basic state variables mentioned above will be assumed to have unique values at each such ‘point’ in the continuum and we will confidently assume that the variables and their derivatives are continuous functions of physical space and time. This means, of course, that the fundamental physical laws governing the motions of the atmospheric fluid can be expressed in terms of a set of partial differential equations in which the basic state variables are the dependent variables and space and time are the independent variables. In order to construct these equations, we will rely on some mathematical tools that you may have seen before. The following section will offer a review of a number of the more important ones.

1.2 Review of Useful Mathematical Tools

We have already considered, in a conceptual sense only, the rather unique nature of fluids. A variety of mathematical tools must be brought to bear in order to construct rigorous descriptions of the behavior of these fascinating fluids. In the following section we will review a number of these tools in some detail. The reader familiar with any of these topics may skip the treatments offered here and run no risk of confusion later. We will begin our review by considering elements of vector analysis.

Figure 1.1 The 3-D representation of a vector, . The components of are shown along the coordinate axes

1.2.1 Elements of vector calculus

Many physical quantities with which we are concerned in our experience of the universe are described entirely in terms of magnitude. Examples of these types of quantities, known as scalars, are area, volume, money, and snowfall total. There are other physical quantities such as velocity, the force of gravity, and slopes to topography which are characterized by both magnitude and direction. Such quantities are known as vectors and, as you might guess, any description of the fluid atmosphere necessarily contains reference to both scalars and vectors. Thus, it is important that we familiarize ourselves with the mathematical descriptions of these quantities, a formalism known as vector analysis.2

Employing a Cartesian coordinate system in which the three directions (x, y, and z) are mutually orthogonal (i.e. perpendicular to one another), an arbitrary vector, , has components in the x, y, and z directions labeled Ax, Ay, and Az, respectively. These components themselves are scalars since they describe the magnitude of vectors whose directions are given by the coordinate axes (as shown in Figure 1.1). If we denote the direction vectors in the x, y, and z directions as , , and , respectively (where the ˆ symbol indicates the fact that they are vectors with magnitude 1 in the respective directions – so-called unit vectors), then

(1.1a)  

is the component form of the vector, . In a similar manner, the component form of an arbitrary vector is given by

(1.1b)  

Figure 1.2 (a) Vectors and acting upon a point O. (b) Illustration of the tail-to-head method for adding vectors and (c) Illustration of the parallelogram method for adding vectors and

(1.2)  

which is simply the 3-D Pythagorean theorem and can be visually verified with the aid of Figure 1.1.

Vectors can be added to and subtracted from one another both by graphical methods as well as by components. Graphical addition is illustrated with the aid of Figure 1.2. Imagine that the force vectors and are acting at point O as shown in Figure 1.2(a). The total force acting at O is equal to the sum of and . Graphical construction of the vector sum + can be accomplished either by using the tail-to-head method or the parallelogram method. The tail-to-head method involves drawing at the head of and then connecting the tail of to the head of the redrawn (Figure 1.2b). Alternatively, upon constructing a parallelogram with sides and , the diagonal of the parallelogram between and represents the vector sum, + (Figure 1.2c).

If we know the component forms of both and , then their sum is given by

(1.3a)  

Figure 1.3 Graphical subtraction of vector from vector

Figure 1.4 (a) Vectors and with an angle α between them. (b) Illustration of the relationship between vectors and (gray arrows) and their cross-product, × (bold arrow). Note that × is perpendicular to both and

subtracting like components and is given by

(1.3b)  

Vector quantities may also be multiplied in a variety of ways. The simplest vector multiplication involves the product of a vector, , and a scalar, F. The resulting expression for F is given by

(1.4)  

a vector with direction identical to the original vector, , but with a magnitude F times larger than the original magnitude.

It is also possible to multiply two vectors together. In fact, there are two different vector multiplication operations. One such method renders a scalar as the product of the vector multiplication and is thus known as the scalar (or dot) product. The dot product of the vectors and shown in Figure 1.4(a) is given by

(1.5)  

(1.6)  

which expands to the following nine terms:

(1.7)  

Two vectors can also be multiplied together to produce another vector. This vector multiplication operation is known as the vector (or cross-)product and is signified

× .

The magnitude of the resultant vector is given by

(1.8)  

Given the vectors and in their component forms, the cross-product can be calculated by first setting up a 3 × 3 determinant using the unit vectors as the first row, the components of as the second row, and the components of as the third row:

(1.9a)  

Evaluating this determinant involves evaluating three 2 × 2 determinants, each one corresponding to a unit vector , , or . For the component of the resultant vector, only the components of and in the and columns are considered. Multiplying the components along the diagonal (upper left to lower right) first, and then subtracting from that result the product of the terms along the anti-diagonal (lower left to upper right) yields the component of the vector × , which equals (AyBz – AzBy) . The same operation done for the component yields (AxBy – AyBx). For the component, the first and third columns are used to form the 2 × 2 determinant and since the columns are non-consecutive, the result must be multiplied by –1 to yield – (AxBz – AzBx) . Adding these three components together yields

(1.9b)  

Vectors, just like scalar functions, can be differentiated as long as the rules of vector addition and multiplication are obeyed. One simple example is Newton’s second law (which we will see again soon) that states that an object’s momentum will not change unless a force is applied to the object. In mathematical terms,

(1.10)  

where m is the object’s mass and is its velocity. Using the chain rule of differentiation on the right hand side of (1.10) renders

(1.11)  

where is the object’s acceleration. Exploitation of the second term of this expansion is what made Einstein famous!

(1.12)  

The terms involving derivatives of the unit vectors may seem like mathematical baggage but they will be extremely important in our subsequent studies. Physically, such terms will be non-zero only when the coordinate axes used to reference motion are not fixed in space. Our reference frame on a rotating Earth is clearly not fixed and so we will eventually have to make some accommodation for the acceleration of our rotating reference frame. Thus, all six terms in the above expansion will be relevant in our examination of the mid-latitude atmosphere.

The last stop on the review of vector calculus is perhaps the most important one and will examine a tool that is extremely useful in fluid dynamics. We will often need to describe both the magnitude and direction of the derivative of a scalar field. In order to do so we employ a mathematical operator known as the del operator, defined as

(1.13)  

If we apply this partial differential del operator to a scalar function or field, the result is a vector that is known as the gradient of that scalar. Consider the 2-D plan view of an isolated hill in an otherwise flat landscape. If the elevation at each point in the landscape is represented on a 2-D projection, a set of elevation contours results as shown in Figure 1.5. Such contours are lines of equal height above sea level, Z. Given such information, we can determine the gradient of elevation, ∇Z, as

Note that the gradient vector, ∇Z, points up the hill from low values of elevation to high values. At the top of the hill, the derivatives of Z in both the x and y directions are zero so there is no gradient vector there. Thus the gradient, ∇Z, not only measures magnitude of the elevation difference but assigns that magnitude a direction as well. Any scalar quantity, ϕ, is transformed into a vector quantity, ∇ϕ, by the del operator. In subsequent chapters in this book we will concern ourselves with the gradients of a number of scalar variables, among them temperature and pressure.

Figure 1.5 The 2-D plan view of an isolated hill in a flat landscape. Solid lines are contours of elevation (Z) at 50m intervals. Note that the gradient of Z points from low to high values of the scalar Z

The del operator may also be applied to vector quantities. The dot product of ∇ with the vector is written as

(1.14)  

which is a scalar quantity known as the divergence of. Positive divergence physically describes the tendency for a vector field to be directed away from a point whereas negative divergence (also known as convergence) describes the tendency for a vector field to be directed toward a point. Regions of convergence and divergence in the atmospheric fluid are extremely important in determining its behavior.

The cross-product of ∇ with the vector is given by

(1.15a)  

The resulting vector can be calculated using the determinant form we have seen previously,

(1.15b)  

where the second row of the 3 × 3 determinant is filled by the components of ∇ and the third row is filled by the components of . This vector is known as the curl of. The curl of the velocity vector, , will be used to define a quantity called vorticity which is a measure of the rotation of a fluid.

Quite often in a study of the dynamics of the atmosphere, we will encounter second-order partial differential equations. Some of these equations will contain a mathematical operator (which will operate on scalar quantities) known as the Laplacian operator. The Laplacian is the divergence of the gradient and so takes the form

(1.16)  

It is also possible to combine the vector with the del operator to form a new operator that takes the form

and is known as the scalar invariant operator. This operator, which can be used with both vector and scalar quantities, is important because it is used to describe a process known as advection, a ubiquitous topic in the study of fluids.

1.2.2 The Taylor series expansion

(1.17)  

(1.18)  

(1.19)

Since the dependent variables that describe the behavior of the atmosphere are all continuous variables, use of the Taylor series to approximate the values of those variables will prove to be a nifty little trick that we will exploit in our subsequent analyses. Most often we consider Taylor series expansions in which the quantity (x– x0) is very small in order that all terms of order 2 and higher in (1.19), the so-called higher order terms, can be effectively neglected. In such cases, we will approximate the given functions as

1.2.3 Centered difference approximations to derivatives

Though the atmosphere is a continuous fluid and its observed state at any time could theoretically be represented by a continuous function, the reality is that actual observations of the atmosphere are only available at discrete points in space and time. Given that much of the subsequent development in this book will arise from consideration of the spatial and temporal variation of observable quantities, we must consider a method of approximating derivative quantities from discrete data. One such method is known as centered differencing3 and it follows directly from the prior discussion of the Taylor series expansion.

Figure 1.6 Points x1 and x2 defined with respect to a central point x0

Consider the two points x1 and x2 in the near vicinity of a central point, x0, as illustrated in Figure 1.6. We can apply (1.19) at both points to yield

(1.20a)  

and

(1.20b)  

Subtracting (1.20a) from (1.20b) produces

(1.21)  

Isolating the expression for f′(x0) on one side then leaves

which, upon neglecting terms of second order and higher in Δx, can be approximated as

(1.22)  

The foregoing expression represents the centered difference approximation to f′(x) at x0 accurate to second order (i.e. the neglected terms are at least quadratic in Δx).

Adding (1.20a) to (1.20b) gives a similarly approximated expression for the second derivative as

(1.23)  

Such expressions will prove quite useful in evaluating a number of relationships we will encounter later.

1.2.4 Temporal changes of a continuous variable

The fluid atmosphere is an ever evolving medium and so the fundamental variables discussed in Section 1.1 are ceaselessly subject to temporal changes. But what does it really mean to say ‘The temperature has changed in the last hour’? In the broadest sense this statement could have two meanings. It could mean that the temperature of an individual air parcel, moving past the thermometer on my back porch, is changing as it migrates through space. In this case, we would be considering the change in temperature experienced while moving with a parcel of air. However, the statement could also mean that the temperature of the air parcels currently in contact with my thermometer is lower than that of air parcels that used to reside there but have since been replaced by the importation of these colder ones. In this case we would be considering the changes in temperature as measured at a fixed geographic point. These two notions of temporal change are clearly not the same, but one might wonder if and how they are physically and mathematically related. We will consider a not so uncommon example to illustrate this relationship.

(1.24)  

This relationship can be made mathematically rigorous. Doing so will assist us later in the development of the equations of motion that govern the mid-latitude atmosphere. The change following the air parcel is called the Lagrangian rate of change while the change at a fixed point is called the Eulerian rate of change. We can quantify the relationship between these two different views of temporal change by considering an arbitrary scalar (or vector) quantity that we will call Q. If Q is a function of space and time, then

and, from the differential calculus, the total differential ofQ is

(1.25)  

where the subscripts refer to the independent variables that are held constant whilst taking the indicated partial derivatives. Upon dividing both sides of (1.25) by dt, the total differential of t which represents a time increment, the resulting expression is

(1.26)  

(1.27)  

which can be rewritten in vector notation as

(1.28)  

Figure 1.7 Isotherms (dashed lines) and wind vector (filled arrow) surrounding point A. The thin black arrow is the horizontal temperature gradient vector

To round out this discussion, we now return to the example that motivated the mathematical development: measuring the temperature change on my back porch. Rearranging (1.28) and substituting T (temperature) for Q we get

which shows that the Eulerian (fixed location) change is equal to the sum of the Lagrangian (parcel following) change and advection. In the prior example we imagined a temperature drop at my back porch. We also surmised that the temperature of individual air parcels did not undergo any change as the day wore on. Thus, the advective change at the porch must be negative – there must be negative temperature advection, or cold air advection (i.e. – · ∇T < 0), occurring in Madison on this day. Clearly, the situation of northwesterly winds importing cold air southward out of Canada fits the bill.

1.3 Estimating with Scale Analysis

In many fluid dynamical problems, it is convenient and insightful to estimate which physical terms are likely to contribute most to a particular process under study. For instance, in assessing the threat to coastal property in Hawaii in the face of a major tsunami, it is not likely that the ambient wind speed will figure into the problem in any significant way. In the development of the equations of motion in subsequent chapters, a variety of physical processes will be confronted, each of which has some bearing on the behavior of the fluid atmosphere. At many junctures, however, we will attempt to simplify those equations by estimating the magnitude of the mathematical terms that comprise them. A formal process known as scale analysis is employed in such an exercise. Here we illustrate, with a very simple example, the power of scale analysis as an analytical tool.

Imagine you are charged with filling an Olympic-sized swimming pool with water. Your boss wants to know how long it will take to get the job done and asks you for an estimate of the completion time. In order to make a reasonable approximation, you need to know a number of physical characteristics of the problem. You certainly need to know the volume of the pool and the flow rate you can expect from the hose you will use to fill the pool. You might want to know if there are cracks in the pool walls through which seepage might occur. Though it is surely physically relevant, you probably guess that you needn’t concern yourself with the evaporation rate of water from the surface of the filling pool.

All four of the above-mentioned physical characteristics can be measured with varying degrees of accuracy. The volume is likely to be a fairly accurate measurement as is the flow rate from the hose. Seepage rate and evaporation rates, however, are likely to be quite difficult to measure accurately. Imagine we do, in fact, make some measurements of each of these characteristics, assigning an estimated (but characteristic) rate to each of the last three. The flow rate is found to be approximately 100m3 h−1, the evaporation rate 0.001m3 h−1, the seepage rate 0.000 01m3 h−1. It is clear upon comparison of the three that the flow rate is the most important process (it is five to seven orders of magnitude larger than the others). Therefore, we could say that, subject to some small amount of error, the time needed to fill the pool is equal to

We will achieve a similar simplification of the equations of motion by similarly estimating the scale of various terms that appear in those equations.

1.4 Basic Kinematics of Fluids

(1.29a)  

(1.29b)  

If we neglect the terms of order 2 and greater (the so-called higher order terms), which is eminently defensible because they are generally very small, we have

(1.30a)  

(1.30b)  

wherewehavewritten u(x, y) and v(x, y) more conveniently as u and v, respectively.

(1.31a)  

(1.31b)  

By assuming that u0 and v0 (the u and v velocities at our arbitrary origin point) are both zero we can quite readily use the expressions (1.31a) and (1.31b) to investigate what each of the four derivative fields looks like physically. We will consider each quantity in isolation even though, in nature, they all can occur simultaneously in a given observed flow.

1.4.1 Pure vorticity

1.4.2 Pure divergence

1.4.3 Pure stretching deformation

Figure 1.11 (a) A fluid element in a field of pure convergence. The lighter square represents the initially square element. Note that the area of the fluid element is decreased in a field of convergence. (b) A fluid element in a field of pure stretching deformation. The original square is deformed into a rectangle whose area is the same as that of the square

1.4.4 Pure shearing deformation

(1.32)  

Figure 1.12 A field of pure, positive shearing deformation (F2=1). The dark solid lines are streamlines of the deformation field. The axes of dilatation and contraction are indicated by the dashed lines

Thus, deformation is rotationally variant. In fact, if one rotates the coordinate axes by the angle

(1.33)  

then the resultant deformation has its axis of dilatation at an angle θ counterclockwise from the original x-axis. It is clear that any rotation of the x - and y-axes will have no effect whatever on the vorticity or divergence. As a result, these two properties of the flow are known as rotationally invariant or Galilean invariant. This characteristic vests the vorticity and divergence with considerable power in explaining the behavior of fluids, as we will see.

1.5 Mensuration

Before we embark upon our investigation of the forces that govern the behavior of the fluid atmosphere, we must explicitly lay out the units with which we will measure the quantities of interest. Throughout the remainder of the text we will employ the Système Internationale (SI) units shown in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1 Standard SI units

Property

Name

Symbol

Length

Meter

m

Mass

Kilogram

kg

Time

Second

s

Temperature

Kelvin

K

Table 1.2 Important SI derived units

Property

Name

Symbol

Frequency

Hertz

Hz (s

-1

)

Force

Newton

N (kg m s

-2

)

Pressure

Pascal

Pa (N m

-2

)

Energy

Joule

J (N m)

Power

Watt

W (J s

-1

)

Additionally, a number of derived quantities will be referenced throughout our study and they are shown in Table 1.2.

Despite the fact that we will refer to temperature in °C (or occasionally in °F when using an older diagram to illustrate a point), it is important to remember to use SI units in all calculations you may have to make.

Selected References

A complete reference list is provided in the Bibliography at the end of the book.

Spiegel, M. R., Vector Analysis and an Introduction to Tensor Analysis, is an outstanding, concise text on vector calculus with nearly 500 solved problems.

Thomas and Finney, Calculus and Analytic Geometry, provides additional detail on the Taylor series and fundamental calculus.

Hess, Introduction to Theoretical Meteorology, discusses the basic kinematics of fluids.

Saucier, Principles of Meteorological Analysis, is another fine reference on kinematics.

Problems

1.3. The symbol stands for the projection of vector onto vector . In other words, represents the component of that is parallel to . Derive an expression for in terms of the vectors and .

1.4. Show that a field of pure deformation (i.e. the combination of both components, F1 and F2) has no divergence and no vorticity.

1.5. Consider Figure 1.1A which shows isotherms (dashed lines) in fields of pure vorticity, pure convergence (negative divergence), and deformation. The vector ∇T has both magnitude and direction.

Figure 1.1A

(a) Do you think the vorticity can change both the direction and magnitude of ∇T? Does the orientation of the isotherms affect the answer to the first question? Explain.
(b) Do you think the convergence can change both the direction and magnitude of ∇T? Does the orientation of the isotherms affect the answer to the first question? Explain.
(c) Do you think the deformation can change both the direction and magnitude of ∇T? Does the orientation of the isotherms affect the answer to the first question? Explain.
(a) Derive an expression for the time rate of change of this area, d A/dt. (Hint:
where F is any variable.)
(b) What kinematic field is represented by
Defend your choice.
(c) Describe (with a word) the type of flow that will result in a decrease in A. Defend your choice with a diagram and accompanying explanation.

Solutions

1 The Earth’s atmosphere has a mass of 5.265 × 1018 kg!

2 Vector analysis is generally considered to have been invented by the Irish mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton in 1843. Despite its enormous value in the physical sciences, vector analysis was met with skepticism in the nineteenth century. In fact, Lord Kelvin wrote, in the 1890s, that vectors were ‘an unmixed evil to those who have touched them in any way . . vectors . . have never been of the slightest use to any creature’. Remember, no matter how great a thinker one may be, one cannot always be right!

3 Centered differencing is a subset of a broader category of such approximations known as finite differencing.