0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: DigiCat
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "New Amazonia," Elizabeth Burgoyne Corbett crafts a visionary narrative that intertwines themes of feminism, utopia, and social reform. Set in a distant future where women have established a thriving society devoid of patriarchal structures, the novel employs a blend of speculative fiction and allegory, reflecting the burgeoning feminist discourse of the late 19th century. Corbett's meticulous prose and imaginative world-building create a striking contrast to the Victorian norms of her era, inviting readers to envision a society where gender roles are subverted and women can flourish as autonomous beings. Elizabeth Burgoyne Corbett, an author and suffragette from England, used her literary talents to champion social progress and women's rights. Her own experiences and convictions influenced her writing, as she was an active participant in the feminist movements of her time. Corbett's insights into the societal constructs shaping women's lives provided a rich backdrop for her exploration of gender equality and emancipation, making "New Amazonia" not only a narrative of escape but also a profound critique of contemporary gender dynamics. This book is highly recommended for readers interested in feminist literature and utopian storytelling. Corbett's innovative vision offers not only an escape into a radically different world but also a strong call to reflect on the possibilities of an egalitarian future. Dive into the pages of "New Amazonia" to discover a compelling and thought-provoking narrative that resonates with ongoing dialogues about gender and society. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2022
Ähnliche
New Amazonia
Table of Contents
Introduction
By projecting a world where women hold political and cultural authority and the inherited certainties of Victorian society are reversed, New Amazonia centers its drama on the unsettling distance between what a confident future can envision and what the present dares to allow, asking readers to test every assumption—about power, work, family, education, and the uses of law—against a social order imagined from the other side of custom, and to weigh whether justice is better served by preserving familiar arrangements or by reconfiguring them so thoroughly that everyday life, and even common sense, must be learned anew.
Elizabeth Burgoyne Corbett’s New Amazonia is a late nineteenth-century work of speculative fiction that participates in the feminist utopian tradition emerging alongside heated public debates about women’s rights in Britain. The book imagines a traveler from the author’s present encountering a future, female-governed nation and uses that setting to examine institutions, customs, and civic ideals. Written in the idiom of its era and blending satire with earnest social critique, it belongs with other future-visit narratives that measure the present by an invented tomorrow, offering readers both an alternative polity to contemplate and a mirror held up to contemporary norms.
At the outset, the narrator’s leap forward in time functions as a simple door into an unfamiliar country, where guides explain how political life, labor, education, and domestic arrangements have been reorganized. Much of the storytelling unfolds through conversation, observation, and pointed comparison, so the narrative often reads like a tour that pauses for debate. The voice is direct and frequently ironic, the pacing brisk, the explanations layered with both idealism and pragmatic detail. Rather than relying on spectacle, the book builds its argument through institutions and everyday scenes, creating a lucid, accessible itinerary through a deliberately reimagined society.
Corbett’s central themes arise from testing how law, education, and economics interact with gendered power. The future state becomes a laboratory for questions about civic participation, responsibility, and the relation between personal freedom and common good. Marriage, property, professional life, punishment, and public health are recast to expose the pressures and prejudices of the narrator’s home era, inviting readers to ask which customs are ethical principles and which are simply habits. The book’s feminism proceeds by structural thought experiments: shift who governs, revalue kinds of work, adjust incentives, and observe how different rules reshape opportunity, dignity, and social trust.
Stylistically, New Amazonia balances advocacy with narrative charm. The prose is straightforward yet animated by satirical turns that tease out contradictions in received wisdom, and the future’s institutions are sketched with enough detail to provoke reflection without collapsing into technical minutiae. Dialogues provide opposing viewpoints, allowing the narrator—and by extension the reader—to test claims from multiple angles. The result is less a prophecy than a carefully staged conversation, one that treats imagination as a political instrument. The travel frame keeps the pages moving, while the measured humor softens confrontation and keeps the focus on ideas rather than personalities.
For contemporary readers, the book’s provocations remain timely because they ask not only what reforms are desirable, but how a society might practically sustain them. Questions about representation, the value of care, the distribution of work, and the design of public institutions persist, and Corbett’s method—imagining a different baseline and then reasoning outward—offers a rigorous way to think beyond incrementalism. The novel also shows how speculative fiction can function as civic pedagogy, transforming policy arguments into scenes one can visualize and debate. In an age crowded with prognoses, its insistence on testing ideals through systems feels bracingly relevant.
Approach New Amazonia as both an artifact of its moment and a live thought experiment. Read it for the pleasure of its brisk journey and for the provocations embedded in each institutional encounter, but also for the discipline with which it keeps returning to first principles: what a state is for, what a citizen owes, and how fairness can be measured. Without foreclosing debate, the book opens room to imagine arrangements different from our own and to test them against experience. In doing so, it offers a generous challenge: envision boldly, question rigorously, and let the future revise the present.
Synopsis
Published in 1889, Elizabeth Burgoyne Corbett’s New Amazonia: A Foretaste of the Future uses a speculative journey to answer contemporary opposition to women’s political rights. Its narrator, wearied by the confident certainties of anti-suffragist rhetoric, is swept out of the late-Victorian present into a distant future where a nation called New Amazonia has taken shape. The transition is less about machinery than about perspective: the book invites readers to see familiar institutions at a revealing distance. Upon arrival, the traveler is received not as a conqueror but as a curious witness, positioned to compare entrenched customs with the reorganized life of a new society.
First encounters stress the calm efficiency of public life and the visibility of women in every sphere. The visitor observes well-ordered streets, hygienic housing, and citizens moving with purposeful ease, suggesting a social compact grounded in mutual responsibility. An appointed guide introduces New Amazonia’s foundational premise: political authority rests with women in a settlement founded to redress longstanding inequities, yet the objective is balance rather than vengeance. Men participate in work and culture, though expectations have been reset. Early scenes emphasize material sufficiency, sobriety, and a conspicuous absence of ostentation, framing the future as a practical correction to prior excesses.
New Amazonia’s government is presented as a public service rather than a prize. Authority is tied to demonstrable competence and close scrutiny, with procedures designed to prevent favoritism and lifelong monopoly of office. Debates are concise and empirical, and measures are judged by outcomes in health, learning, and general prosperity. The legal system emphasizes prevention, restitution, and social reintegration rather than punishment for its own sake. Military display is negligible; security rests on orderly administration and diplomacy instead of glory-seeking. In contrast with familiar patronage and party quarrels, the narrator encounters institutions that are transparent, economical, and plainly directed to common use.
Economic life is organized to reward socially useful labor, reduce waste, and protect citizens from precariousness. The traveler tours workplaces where harmful drudgery is minimized and necessary tasks are fairly distributed. Domestic labor is publicly valued, no longer treated as invisible or inferior. Coordination of key services replaces speculation that once magnified inequality, and standards of production favor durability and health over novelty for its own sake. The narrator notes the disappearance of conspicuous poverty and the loosening of idle privilege, reading these results as the effect of deliberate policy choices rather than charitable sentiment.
Reform reaches into the private sphere. Marriage is treated as a solemn partnership between equals, safeguarded by clear rights and responsibilities, with the welfare of children defined as a paramount public concern. Education begins early and continues throughout life, mingling physical training with science, arts, and civic knowledge to cultivate independence and public spirit. Girls and boys learn together under standards that dissolve the old dichotomy between ornament and utility. Attention to health includes sensible clothing and recreation, encouraging strength without affectation. Observing these arrangements, the narrator recognizes how Victorian domestic ideals had reinforced dependence, while here domestic affections are anchored in competence and reciprocity.
The tour also displays a culture at ease with inquiry and proportion. Belief and conscience are respected as private matters, while public policy is argued in secular terms and subjected to practical tests. The arts are vigorous but measured, and scientific work proceeds under norms that connect discovery to the public good. Technological conveniences are evaluated for how they enlarge education and leisure, not merely for spectacle. Care for surroundings appears as common prudence, with clean, accessible spaces supporting health. Throughout, the narrator’s hosts counter claims about women’s supposed fragility by normalizing female authority, making the extraordinary seem ordinary through daily competence.
Without disclosing the narrative’s final turn, the closing chapters return the traveler to the question that opened the book: what counts as practical? New Amazonia sketches a future that is less wondrous than workable, inviting readers to measure custom by consequence. As an early feminist utopia, it intervenes directly in late nineteenth-century debates over women’s citizenship, using satire and tour to convert argument into evidence. Its enduring resonance lies in the steadiness of its proposal: that equitable governance, social utility, and shared responsibility can be imagined together. The book leaves its visitor—and its audience—considering how far present arrangements fall short of that compass.
Historical Context
Published in 1889, New Amazonia appeared in late-Victorian Britain, a global imperial power governed by a bicameral Parliament at Westminster and a constitutional monarchy. The era's booming periodical press and circulating libraries carried political debate into middle-class homes. Utopian and future-fiction surged after Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward (1888), inviting readers to compare present institutions with imagined alternatives. Corbett adopts this comparative frame, projecting a future commonwealth to assess the social order she knew—marked by male political dominance, established churches, and limited access for women to public offices. Her setting uses distance in time and place to interrogate contemporary British governance and civic life.
Debate over women's rights framed the book's immediate context. In Britain, coverture still constrained married women's legal identity, though the Married Women's Property Acts of 1870 and 1882 let wives own and control earnings and property. Single and widowed women ratepayers had been enfranchised in some local elections since 1869, yet national parliamentary voting remained exclusively male, even after the 1884 Reform Act expanded the male electorate. Campaigning organizations, public meetings, and petitions pressed for suffrage and legal reform. Corbett's imagined polity measures these inequalities against a future in which political citizenship, civil rights, and office-holding are no longer reserved to men.
Educational and professional opportunities for women were widening unevenly. The Elementary Education Act (1870) expanded schooling, and women sat on elected school boards. The University of London opened degrees to women in 1878, while women's colleges at Cambridge (Girton, 1869; Newnham, 1871) and at Oxford offered instruction without full degree rights. The 1876 Medical Act permitted examining bodies to license women doctors, yet law, the universities themselves, and many civil posts remained closed. Such partial access made women's economic independence precarious. Corbett's future state extrapolates from these reforms, imagining institutions where advanced education, research, and public service are organized without gender barriers.
Controversies over marriage, sexuality, and public morality animated the 1880s. Mona Caird's 1888 attack on legal and social constraints within marriage sparked the Daily Telegraph's "Is Marriage a Failure?" debate, drawing tens of thousands of responses. Campaigners secured the Criminal Law Amendment Act (1885), which raised the age of consent, amid W. T. Stead's sensational "Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon" expose. Feminists led the successful repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts in 1886, challenging state regulation of prostitution. Temperance activism, including the British Women's Temperance Association, advanced arguments about domestic welfare. Corbett's imagined reforms echo this climate of legal, moral, and protective agitation.
Industrial and urban change reshaped work and class politics. Women's employment clustered in low-paid "sweated" trades such as garment making and domestic service, with limited union representation. High-profile mobilizations—the Matchgirls' Strike at Bryant & May in 1888 and the London Dock Strike in 1889—heralded "New Unionism," emphasizing organization among unskilled labor. Cooperative ventures and friendly societies offered alternative economic models. Economic insecurity and gendered wage hierarchies were persistent feminist concerns. Corbett's utopian commonwealth addresses production, remuneration, and social welfare through planned institutions, setting its arrangements against the competitive marketplace and charitable paternalism dominant in late-Victorian industrial society.
Broader constitutional questions also framed the decade. The government wrestled with Irish land unrest and demands for Home Rule; Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone's first Home Rule Bill was defeated in 1886, splitting the Liberal Party and dominating British politics. Land reforms, including the 1881 Land Law (Ireland) Act, sought to quell agrarian conflict. Debates over sovereignty, finance, and the relationship between center and periphery were constant. Utopian fiction frequently displaced authority from Westminster to imagine alternative polities. Corbett's future commonwealth draws on these currents, reconfiguring territorial identity and state power to test how reformed governance might reshape everyday life and citizenship.
Victorian faith in progress, science, and administration supplied tools for social imagination. Electric lighting, telegraphy, and expanding rail networks suggested a managed, interconnected future. Public health reforms, sanitary engineering, and statistics promised measurable improvement. Simultaneously, Francis Galton's coinage of "eugenics" (1883) and movements such as rational dress (the Rational Dress Society, 1881) framed debates about the body, health, and heredity. Reformers linked temperance, diet, and exercise to civic virtue. Corbett's projections of orderly institutions and regulated habits reflect this technocratic mood, employing future medicine, education, and planning to critique the Victorian mixture of laissez-faire economics and moralistic social control.
New Amazonia belongs to a wave of feminist utopias that used speculative settings to test political ideas, alongside earlier works like Mary E. Bradley Lane's Mizora (1880–81) and, soon after, William Morris's socialist News from Nowhere (1890) and the "New Woman" debates of the 1890s. Corbett, an English novelist and suffragist, leverages satire, reportage, and institutional detail to contrast the 1880s order with a reformed future. By recasting citizenship, education, property, and social policy, the book interrogates Victorian assumptions about gender and power. Its imagined commonwealth serves as both critique and provocation, inviting readers to reassess contemporary norms without presuming inevitability.
New Amazonia
PROLOGUE.
It is small wonder that the perusal of that hitherto, in my eyes, immaculate magazine, the Nineteenth Century[1], affords me less pleasure than usual. There may possibly be some articles in it both worth reading and worth remembering, but of these I am no longer conscious, for an overmastering rage fills my soul, to the exclusion of everything else.
One article stands out with such prominence beyond the rest that, to all intents and purposes, this number of the Nineteenth Century contains nothing else for me. Not that there is anything admirable in the said article[1q]. Far from it[2q]. I look upon it as the most despicable piece of treachery ever perpetrated towards woman by women.
Indeed, were it not that some of the perpetrators of this outrage on my sex are well-known writers and society leaders, I would doubt the authenticity of the signatures, and comfort my soul with the belief that the whole affair has been nothing but a hoax got up by timorous and jealous male bipeds, already living in fear of the revolution in social life which looms before us at no distant date.
As it is, I am able to avail myself of no such doubtful solace, and I can only feel mad, downright mad—no other word is strong enough—because I am not near enough to these traitors to their own sex to give them a viva voce[2] specimen of my opinion of them, though I resolve mentally that they shall taste of my vengeance in the near future, if I can only devise some sure method of bringing this about.
But perhaps by this time some of my readers, who may not have seen or heard of the objectionable article in question, may be anxious to know what this tirade is all about.
I will tell them[3q].
But I must first allude to the fact that my sex really consists of three great divisions. To the first, but not necessarily the superior division, belongs the class which prefers to be known as ladies.
Ladies, or rather the class to which they belong, are generally found to rest their claim to this distinction, if it be one, upon the fact that they are the wives or daughters of prominent or well-to-do members of the other sex.
