Sawing of my article about the Big Bang E-Book

Jan Slowak

• Herausgeber: Books on Demand
• Kategorie: Wissenschaft und neue Technologien
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 41

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015

Beschreibung

Big Bang theory is the prevailing theory of the origin of the universe and its development. Its main argument is so-called "galaxies escape". The analysis of the light from galaxies shows that the spectral lines are shifted to the red part of the spectrum. Based on the Doppler effect interpret this to mean that "most" of galaxies receding from the observer. It is said that in the past was galaxies closer together. If we goes even further back in time, this means that the entire universe was compressed into a point that exploded. There we have Big Bang. The author has published an article in the topic above. But the article was totally sawn by an opponent. The author would like this letter to defend themselves and want to show their duel for everyone to judge what is right or wrong, or better said how much it is right and how much is it wrong!

Leseprobe

Earlier articles / booksTidigare artiklar / böcker

1. Bye-Bye Big Bang, Episod/Episode 1

2. Bye-Bye Big Bang, Episod/Episode 2

3. Bye-Bye Big Bang, Episod/Episode 3

4. Redshift factor, Absolute redshift,Galaxies red / blue distribution

For Ida,my daughter

ex nihilo nihil fit

Content/Innehåll

1) English/Engelsk version

2) Swedish/Svensk version

3) Comments/Kommentarer

Introduction

On March 11, 2015, I published an article / book on the subject cosmology. Its title is: Redshift factor, Absolute redshift, Galaxies red / blue distribution.

In the article, I had intended to do a brief review of the Big Bang theory, and presenting my analysis of existing data and how this analysis contradicts (in my opinion, of course) the main argument for the Big Bang, so-called "galaxies flight ".

I have university studies in mathematics and computer science, call me why mathematicians.

I do not work in the academic world and therefore I can not call myself researchers.

But perhaps would fit better amateur researchers. If you allow it. I'm thinking, pondering, reading, have it as a hobby. I am fascinated by all kinds of science. Most cosmology, anthropology, history.

It is amazing to read about scientists' discoveries, new achievements, new theories, new interpretations.

But everything you read is filtered and processed based on the reader's background, education and secure other factors.

To the topic

In my article I draw to the fairly revolutionary conclusions.

I have sent requests to various magazines, researchers, but no one was interested to publish or comment on my article. I got the tip to publish this article on viXra, and I did. It was 28 downloads of it, but no one commented anything.

Therefore, I have removed it from viXra and published the article by publisher Books on Demand.

I do not advertise my article by writing another. I'm not looking to make money on it.

What happened?

As you might imagine, I wanted to have a discussion on the topic, a discussion of my analysis and conclusions. Deep down I had a feeling that I am right. But as you know, there is not enough emotion to prove / disprove a scientific theory. We need evidence, calculations and much more.

Because there were so few that bought / read my article, I have sent the printed copy to some people at various institutions in both Sweden and other countries.

For shipment I put a cover letter with the following content:

***

Big Bang theory is the prevailing theory of the origin of the universe and its development. Its main argument is the so-called "galactic escape".

The analysis of the light from galaxies shows that the spectral lines are shifted to the red part of the spectrum. Based on the Doppler effect interpret this to mean that "most" of galaxies receding from the observer. One says that in the past was galaxies closer together. If one goes even further back in time, this means that the entire universe was compressed into a point that exploded. There we have Big Bang.

With the help of the analysis of existing data the author shows that the main argument for the Big Bang theory is incorrect.

I wonder if there is anyone in your institution who would oppose my work and my conclusions. Or if there is a possibility that I will present my work in any seminar or in a small group.

***

So far I have received one reply from an opponent.

When I saw the response in my email box, I was tense to the maximum of expectations!

Here is the answer:

***

I have read your book and find it does not really add anything to science, see the attached comments. It is full of deliberate (?) misunderstanding with the obvious origin aim to try to shoot down the theory that currently thoroughly outperforms other proposed interpretations of the origin of the universe and its history. I suggest you seek out and try to understand contemporary literature and scientific methodology.

The Big Bang theory is taught at all prestigious universities that have astronomy teaching.

Big Bang Theory is accepted by very close of all cosmologists and astronomers today. It is good that there are people who are trying to find errors in theory and seeking other explanations - we can never prove that there is no better theory. We stick to the currently most probable theory (and the current moment has been and promises to be persistent). And those who want to refute the theory must show that research methods are as thorough and well-founded as it is very sturdy trusses that make up the physics and astrophysics today. Your book does not come close to this and we have no interest in further exchanges. You have to say, burning your ships with us.

I just got to know that I'm not the only recipient of your book - I hope therefore that the other recipients are not also using several hours of valuable time to comment on it.

With friendly but firm greeting

***

Oh, oh, oh!