Science Curiosities
Science CuriositiesPhysical Phenomena.Sound and Light.Astronomy.Geology and Paleontology.Meteorological Phenomena.Phenomena of Heat.Magnetism and Electricity.The Electric Telegraph.Miscellanea.FOOTNOTES:Impressum
Science Curiosities
John Timbs
Physical Phenomena.
Sound and Light.
SOUNDING SAND.
Mr. Hugh Miller, the geologist, when in the island of Eigg, in the
Hebrides, observed that a musical sound was produced when he walked
over the white dry sand of the beach. At each step the sand was
driven from his footprint, and the noise was simultaneous with the
scattering of the sand; the cause being either the accumulated
vibrations of the air when struck by the driven sand, or the
accumulated sounds occasioned by the mutual impact of the particles
of sand against each other. If a musket-ball passing through the
air emits a whistling note, each individual particle of sand must
do the same, however faint be the note which it yields; and the
accumulation of these infinitesimal vibrations must constitute an
audible sound, varying with the number and velocity of the moving
particles. In like manner, if two plates of silex or quartz, which
are but crystals of sand, give out a musical sound when mutually
struck, the impact or collision of two minute crystals or particles
of sand must do the same, in however inferior a degree; and the
union of all these sounds, though singly imperceptible, may
constitute the musical notes of “the Mountain of the Bell” in
Arabia Petræa, or the lesser sounds of the trodden sea-beach of
Eigg.—North-British Review,
No. 5.
INTENSITY OF SOUND IN RAREFIED AIR.
The experiences during ascents of the highest mountains are
contradictory. Saussure describes the sounds on the top of Mont
Blanc as remarkably weak: a pistol-shot made no more noise than an
ordinary Chinese cracker, and the popping of a bottle of champagne
was scarcely audible. Yet Martius, in the same situation, was able
to distinguish the voices of the guides at a distance of 1340 feet,
and to hear the tapping of a lead pencil upon a metallic surface at
a distance of from 75 to 100 feet.MM Wertheim and Breguet have propagated sound over the wire
of an electric telegraph at the rate of 11,454 feet per
second.
DISTANCE AT WHICH THE HUMAN VOICE MAY BE
HEARD.
Experience shows that the human voice, under favourable
circumstances, is capable of filling a larger space than was ever
probably enclosed within the walls of a single room. Lieutenant
Foster, on Parry’s third Arctic expedition, found that he could
converse with a man across the harbour of Port Bowen, a distance of
6696 feet, or about one mile and a quarter. Dr. Young records that
at Gibraltar the human voice has been heard at a distance of ten
miles. If sound be prevented from spreading and losing itself in
the air, either by a pipe or an extensive flat surface, as a wall
or still water, it may be conveyed to a great distance. Biot heard
a flute clearly through a tube of cast-iron (the water-pipes of
Paris) 3120 feet long: the lowest whisper was distinctly heard;
indeed, the only way not to be heard was not to speak at
all.
THE ROAR OF NIAGARA.
The very nature of the sound of running water pronounces its origin
to be the bursting of bubbles: the impact of water against water is
a comparatively subordinate cause, and could never of itself
occasion the murmur of a brook; whereas, in streams which Dr.
Tyndall has examined, he, in all cases where a ripple was heard,
discovered bubbles caused by the broken column of water. Now, were
Niagara continuous, and without lateral vibration, it would be as
silent as a cataract of ice. In all probability, it has its
“contracted sections,” after passing which it is broken into
detached masses, which, plunging successively upon the air-bladders
formed by their precursors, suddenly liberate their contents, and
thus createthe thunder of the
waterfall.
FIGURES PRODUCED BY SOUND.
Stretch a sheet of wet paper over the mouth of a glass tumbler
which has a footstalk, and glue or paste the paper at the edges.
When the paper is dry, strew dry sand thinly upon its surface.
Place the tumbler on a table, and hold immediately above it, and
parallel to the paper, a plate of glass, which you also strew with
sand, having previously rubbed the edges smooth with emery powder.
Draw a violin-bow along any part of the edges; and as the sand upon
the glass is made to vibrate, it will form various figures, which
will be accurately imitated by the sand upon the paper; or if a
violin or flute be played within a few inches of the paper, they
will cause the sand upon its surface to form regular lines and
figures.
THE TUNING-FORK A FLUTE-PLAYER.
Take a common tuning-fork, and on one of its branches fasten with
sealing-wax a circular piece of card of the size of a small wafer,
or sufficient nearly to cover the aperture of a pipe, as the
sliding of the upper end of a flute with the mouth stopped: it may
be tuned in unison with the loaded tuning-fork by means of the
movable stopper or card, or the fork may be loaded till the unison
is perfect. Then set the fork in vibration by a blow on the
unloaded branch, and hold the card closely over the mouth of the
pipe, as in the engraving, when a note of surprising clearness and
strength will be heard. Indeed a flute may be made to “speak”
perfectly well, by holding close to the opening a vibrating
tuning-fork, while the fingering proper to the note of the fork is
at the same time performed.
THEORY OF THE JEW’S HARP.
If you cause the tongue of this little instrument to vibrate, it
will produce a very low sound; but if you place it before a cavity
(as the mouth) containing a column of air, which vibrates much
faster, but in the proportion of any simple multiple, it will then
produce other higher sounds, dependent upon the reciprocation of
that portion of the air. Now the bulk of air in the mouth can be
altered in its form, size, and other circumstances, so as to
produce by reciprocation many different sounds; and these are the
sounds belonging to the Jew’s Harp.A proof of this fact has been given by Mr. Eulenstein, who
fitted into a long metallic tube a piston, which being moved, could
be made to lengthen or shorten the efficient column of air within
at pleasure. A Jew’s Harp was then so fixed that it could be made
to vibrate before the mouth of the tube, and it was found that the
column of air produced a series of sounds, according as it was
lengthened or shortened; a sound being produced whenever the length
of the column was such that its vibrations were a multiple of those
of the Jew’s Harp.
SOLAR AND ARTIFICIAL LIGHT COMPARED.
The most intensely ignited solid (produced by the flame of
Lieutenant Drummond’s oxy-hydrogen lamp directed against a surface
of chalk) appears only as black spots on the disc of the sun, when
held between it and the eye; or in other words, Drummond’s light is
to the light of the sun’s disc as 1 to 146. Hence we are doubly
struck by the felicity with which Galileo, as early as 1612, by a
series of conclusions on the smallness of the distance from the sun
at which the disc of Venus was no longer visible to the naked eye,
arrived at the result that the blackest nucleus of the sun’s spots
was more luminous than the brightest portions of the full moon.
(See “The Sun’s Light compared with Terrestrial Lights,” inThings not generally Known, pp. 4,
5.)
SOURCE OF LIGHT.
Mr. Robert Hunt, in a lecture delivered by him at the Russell
Institution, “On the Physics of a Sunbeam,” mentions some
experiments by Lord Brougham on the sunbeam, in which, by placing
the edge of a sharp knife just within the limit of the light, the
ray was inflected from its previous direction, and coloured red;
and when another knife was placed on the opposite side, it was
deflected, and the colour was blue. These experiments (says Mr.
Hunt) seem to confirm Sir Isaac Newton’s theory, that light is a
fluid emitted from the sun.
THE UNDULATORY SCALE OF LIGHT.
The white light of the sun is well known to be composed of several
coloured rays; or rather, according to the theory of undulations,
when the rate at which a ray vibrates is altered, a different
sensation is produced upon the optic nerve. The analytical
examination of this question shows that to produce a red colour the
ray of light must give 37,640 undulations in an inch, and
458,000,000,000,000 in a second. Yellow light requires 44,000
undulations in an inch, and 535,000,000,000,000 in a second; whilst
the effect of blue results from 51,110 undulations within an inch,
and 622,000,000,000,000 of waves in a second of time.—Hunt’s Poetry of Science.
VISIBILITY OF OBJECTS.
In terrestrial objects, the form, no less than the modes of
illumination, determines the magnitude of the smallest angle of
vision for the naked eye. Adams very correctly observed that a long
and slender staff can be seen at a much greater distance than a
square whose sides are equal to the diameter of the staff. A stripe
may be distinguished at a greater distance than a spot, even when
both are of the same diameter.Theminimumoptical
visual angle at which terrestrial objects can be recognised by the
naked eye has been gradually estimated lower and lower, from the
time when Robert Hooke fixed it exactly at a full minute, and
Tobias Meyer required 34″ to perceive a black speck on white paper,
to the period of Leuwenhoeck’s experiments with spiders’ threads,
which are visible to ordinary sight at an angle of 4″·7. In Hueck’s
most accurate experiments on the problem of the movement of the
crystalline lens, white lines on a black ground were seen at an
angle of 1″·2; a spider’s thread at 0″·6; and a fine glistening
wire at scarcely 0″·2.Humboldt, when at Chillo, near Quito, where the crests of the
volcano of Pichincha lay at a horizontal distance of 90,000 feet,
was much struck by the circumstance that the Indians standing near
distinguished the figure of Bonpland (then on an expedition to the
volcano), as a white point moving on the black basaltic sides of
the rock, sooner than Humboldt could discover him with a telescope.
Bonpland was enveloped in a white cotton poncho: assuming the
breadth across the shoulders to vary from three to five feet,
according as the mantle clung to the figure or fluttered in the
breeze, and judging from the known distance, the angle at which the
moving object could be distinctly seen varied from 7″ to 12″. White
objects on a black ground are, according to Hueck, distinguished at
a greater distance than black objects on a white
ground.Gauss’s heliotrope light has been seen with the naked eye
reflected from the Brocken on Hobenhagen at a distance of about
227,000 feet, or more than 42 miles; being frequently visible at
points in which the apparent breadth of a three-inch mirror was
only 0″·43.
THE SMALLEST BRIGHT BODIES.
Ehrenberg has found from experiments on the dust of diamonds, that
a diamond superficies of 1/100th of a line in diameter presents a
much more vivid light to the naked eye than one of quicksilver of
the same diameter. On pressing small globules of quicksilver on a
glass micrometer, he easily obtained smaller globules of the
1/100th to the 1/2000th of a line in diameter. In the sunshine he
could only discern the reflection of light, and the existence of
such globules as were 1/300th of a line in diameter, with the naked
eye. Smaller ones did not affect his eye; but he remarked that the
actual bright part of the globule did not amount to more than
1/900th of a line in diameter. Spider threads of 1/2000th in
diameter were still discernible from their lustre. Ehrenberg
concludes that there are in organic bodies magnitudes capable of
direct proof which are in diameter 1/100000 of a line; and others,
that can be indirectly proved, which may be less than a
six-millionth part of a Parisian line in diameter.
VELOCITY OF LIGHT.
It is scarcely possible so to strain the imagination as to conceive
the Velocity with which Light travels. “What mere assertion will
make any man believe,” asks Sir John Herschel, “that in one second
of time, in one beat of the pendulum of a clock, a ray of light
travels over 192,000 miles; and would therefore perform the tour of
the world in about the same time that it requires to wink with our
eyelids, and in much less time than a swift runner occupies in
taking a single stride?” Were a cannon-ball shot directly towards
the sun, and were it to maintain its full speed, it would be twenty
years in reaching it; and yet light travels through this space in
seven or eight minutes.The result given in theAnnuairefor 1842 for the velocity of
light in a second is 77,000 leagues, which corresponds to 215,834
miles; while that obtained at the Pulkowa Observatory is 189,746
miles. William Richardson gives as the result of the passage of
light from the sun to the earth 8´ 19″·28, from which we obtain a
velocity of 215,392 miles in a second.—Memoirs of
the Astronomical Society, vol.
iv.In other words, light travels a distance equal to eight
times the circumference of the earth between two beats of a clock.
This is a prodigious velocity; but the measure of it is very
certain.—Professor Airy.The navigator who has measured the earth’s circuit by
his hourly progress, or the astronomer who has paced a degree of
the meridian, can alone form a clear idea of velocity, when we tell
him that light moves through a space equal to the circumference of
the earth inthe eighth part of a
second—in the twinkling of an
eye.Could an observer, placed in the centre of the earth,
see this moving light, as it describes the earth’s circumference,
it would appear a luminous ring; that is, the impression of the
light at the commencement of its journey would continue on the
retina till the light had completed its circuit. Nay, since the
impression of light continues longer than thefourthpart of a second,twoluminous rings would be seen,
provided the light madetworounds of the earth, and in paths not
coincident.
APPARATUS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LIGHT.
Humboldt enumerates the following different methods adopted for the
Measurement of Light: a comparison of the shadows of artificial
lights, differing in numbers and distance; diaphragms;
plane-glasses of different thickness and colour; artificial stars
formed by reflection on glass spheres; the juxtaposition of two
seven-feet telescopes, separated by a distance which the observer
could pass in about a second; reflecting instruments in which two
stars can be simultaneously seen and compared, when the telescope
has been so adjusted that the star gives two images of like
intensity; an apparatus having (in front of the object-glass) a
mirror and diaphragms, whose rotation is measured on a ring;
telescopes with divided object-glasses, on either half of which the
stellar light is received through a prism; astrometers, in which a
prism reflects the image of the moon or Jupiter, and concentrates
it through a lens at different distances into a star more or less
bright.—Cosmos, vol.
iii.
HOW FIZEAU MEASURED THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT.
This distinguished physicist has submitted the Velocity of Light to
terrestrial measurement by means of an ingeniously constructed
apparatus, in which artificial light (resembling stellar light),
generated from oxygen and hydrogen, is made to pass back, by means
of a mirror, over a distance of 28,321 feet to the same point from
which it emanated. A disc, having 720 teeth, which made 12·6
rotations in a second, alternately obscured the ray of light and
allowed it to be seen between the teeth on the margin. It was
supposed, from the marking of a counter, that the artificial light
traversed 56,642 feet, or the distance to and from the stations, in
1/1800th part of a second, whence we obtain a velocity of 191,460
miles in a second.12This result
approximates most closely to Delambre’s (which was 189,173 miles),
as obtained from Jupiter’s satellites.The invention of the rotating mirror is due to
Wheatstone, who made an experiment with it to determine the
velocity of the propagation of the discharge of a Leyden battery.
The most striking application of the idea was made by Fizeau and
Foucault, in 1853, in carrying out a proposition made by Arago,
soon after the invention of the mirror: we have here determined in
a distance of twelve feet no less than the velocity with which
light is propagated, which is known to be nearly 200,000 miles a
second; the distance mentioned corresponds therefore to the
77-millionth part of a second. The object of these measurements was
to compare the velocity of light in air with its velocity in water;
which, when the length is greater, is not sufficiently transparent.
The most complete optical and mechanical aids are here necessary:
the mirror of Foucault made from 600 to 800 revolutions in a
second, while that of Fizeau performed 1200 to 1500 in the same
time.—Prof. Helmholtz on the Methods of Measuring
very small Portions of Time.
WHAT IS DONE BY POLARISATION OF LIGHT.
Malus, in 1808, was led by a casual observation of the light of the
setting sun, reflected from the windows of the Palais de
Luxembourg, at Paris, to investigate more thoroughly the phenomena
of double refraction, of ordinary and of chromatic polarisation, of
interference and of diffraction of light. Among his results may be
reckoned the means of distinguishing between direct and reflected
light; the power of penetrating, as it were, into the constitution
of the body of the sun and of its luminous envelopes; of measuring
the pressure of atmospheric strata, and even the smallest amount of
water they contain; of ascertaining the depths of the ocean and its
rocks by means of a tourmaline plate; and in accordance with
Newton’s prediction, of comparing the chemical composition of
several substances with their optical effects.Arago, in a letter to Humboldt, states that by the aid of his
polariscope, he discovered, before 1820, that the light of all
terrestrial objects in a state of incandescence, whether they be
solid or liquid, is natural, so long as it emanates from the object
in perpendicular rays. On the other hand, if such light emanate at
an acute angle, it presents manifest proofs of polarisation. This
led M. Arago to the remarkable conclusion, that light is not
generated on the surface of bodies only, but that some portion is
actually engendered within the substance itself, even in the case
of platinum.A ray of light which reaches our eyes after traversing
many millions of miles, from, the remotest regions of heaven,
announces, as it were of itself, in the polariscope, whether it is
reflected or refracted, whether it emanates from a solid or fluid
or gaseous body; it announces even the degree of its
intensity.—Humboldt’s Cosmos,
vols. i. and ii.
MINUTENESS OF LIGHT.
There is something wonderful, says Arago, in the experiments which
have led natural philosophers legitimately to talk of the different
sides of a ray of light; and to show that millions and millions of
these rays can simultaneously pass through the eye of a needle
without interfering with each other!
THE IMPORTANCE OF LIGHT.
Light affects the respiration of animals just as it affects the
respiration of plants. This is novel doctrine, but it is
demonstrable. In the day-time we expire more carbonic acid than
during the night; a fact known to physiologists, who explain it as
the effect of sleep: but the difference is mainly owing to the
presence or absence of sunlight; for sleep, as sleep,increases, instead of diminishing, the
amount of carbonic acid expired, and a man sleeping will expire
more carbonic acid than if he lies quietly awake under the same
conditions of light and temperature; so that if less is expired
during the night than during the day, the reason cannot be sleep,
but the absence of light. Now we understand why men are sickly and
stunted who live in narrow streets, alleys, and cellars, compared
with those who, under similar conditions of poverty and dirt, live
in the sunlight.—Blackwood’s Edinburgh
Magazine, 1858.The influence of light on the colours of organised
creation is well shown in the sea. Near the shores we find seaweeds
of the most beautiful hues, particularly on the rocks which are
left dry by the tides; and the rich tints of the actiniæ which
inhabit shallow water must often have been observed. The fishes
which swim near the surface are also distinguished by the variety
of their colours, whereas those which live at greater depths are
gray, brown, or black. It has been found that after a certain
depth, where the quantity of light is so reduced that a mere
twilight prevails, the inhabitants of the ocean become nearly
colourless.—Hunt’s Poetry of
Science.
ACTION OF LIGHT ON MUSCULAR FIBRES.