1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Studies in Classic American Literature," D. H. Lawrence offers a profound critique of American literary heritage, delving into the works of prominent writers such as Hawthorne, Melville, and Whitman. Through a uniquely personal and intensely lyrical style, Lawrence interweaves biographical insights with literary analysis, reflecting on themes of individuality, nature, and the American spirit. The book not only serves as a study of literature but also as an exploration of the cultural ethos of early 20th-century America, positioning Lawrence's perspective within the broader context of modernist thought. D. H. Lawrence, renowned for his revolutionary ideas on sexuality and modern society, was profoundly influenced by his experiences with the American landscape and its people during his travels. His critical engagement with American literature reflects his lifelong quest to understand the intricacies of human nature and the socio-political milieu of his time. This work encapsulates his admiration for the vibrancy of American literature while revealing his concerns about its moral and spiritual dimensions. "Studies in Classic American Literature" is a compelling read for anyone interested in literary criticism, American literature, or the intersection of culture and art. Lawrence's insightful observations challenge readers to reassess the canon of American literature and its relevance to contemporary society, making this book an essential addition to both academic and personal libraries. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020
Ähnliche
Studies in Classic American Literature
Table of Contents
Introduction
Against the bright myth of American innocence, D. H. Lawrence uncovers the fierce, buried energies that make its classic literature pulse and tremble.
Studies in Classic American Literature has come to be regarded as a classic of criticism because it reanimates familiar authors with unsettling immediacy and a galvanizing, transatlantic gaze. Lawrence’s readings helped reposition nineteenth-century American writing as a crucible of spiritual and psychological crises rather than a museum of decorum. His audacity—mixing cultural history, symbol-hunting, and personal intuition—gave later critics permission to treat criticism as an exploratory art. Even when his verdicts stirred resistance, they sharpened the conversation around American canonicity. Published in 1923, the book endures not for consensus but for catalytic power: it keeps the tradition alive by contesting it, line by line, myth by myth.
D. H. Lawrence, the British novelist, poet, and essayist, composed these essays in the early 1920s, bringing to bear his distinctive sensibility on a national literature not his own. First published in 1923, Studies in Classic American Literature gathers his essays on key American writers and texts, written at a moment when American literature was being consolidated as a coherent field of study. The collection offers brisk, original engagements rather than academic treatises, locating the living pulse of works by figures such as Benjamin Franklin, Hector St. John de Crèvecœur, James Fenimore Cooper, Edgar Allan Poe, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Herman Melville, and Walt Whitman.
The book’s contents are united by an insistence that literature is not an ornament of culture but a site where a nation unconsciously thinks and feels. Lawrence probes the friction between idealized American self-images and the stubborn facts of desire, authority, violence, and the wildness of the continent itself. He does not summarize plots or catalogue influences; he interprets. Symbols, scenes, and stylistic tics become signs of an inner drama—between the will to order and the call of the elemental. The result is a series of portraits that read like case studies in how America’s imaginative life forged itself on the page.
Lawrence’s purpose is neither patriotic praise nor external dismissal. He aims to test how American writers wrestle with the land, with inherited moral strictures, and with the promises and perils of democratic individualism. He challenges pieties that reduce literature to uplift or utility, urging readers to face the undercurrents that official stories ignore. By tracing the energies that surge beneath manners and maxims, he seeks to free the texts to speak in their own eruptive voices. His intention is to awaken, not to settle: to make the old books strange again so that they can be encountered as living presences.
On publication, the essays were controversial for their bold tone and sweeping judgments, yet their provocations proved generative. The collection widened critical horizons by proposing that American classics could be read as expressions of cultural psychology, not just as moral exempla or national milestones. It encouraged subsequent readers to explore mythic and symbolic structures and to take seriously the tensions between public virtue and private impulse. Over time, the book’s influence can be traced less to particular conclusions than to its method and stance: confident, exploratory, and prepared to risk error in pursuit of insight. That temperament helped shape modern critical practice.
Lawrence’s method is intensely experiential. He reads with the whole body—attuned to rhythm, imagery, and tone—in order to register energies that argument alone cannot fix. He is suspicious of abstract moralism and mechanical certainty; instead, he listens for the push and pull between instinct and idea, between embodied life and rigid doctrine. This approach yields interpretations that are vivid and sometimes abrasive, but rarely indifferent. Even disagreement becomes fruitful, because the essays model how to read for pressure points: places where a text’s stated ideals chafe against its deeper impulses. In doing so, he treats literature as a living field of force.
The authors under his scrutiny become emblematic. Franklin embodies self-making practicality and the temptations of moral bookkeeping; Crèvecœur stages the pastoral dream shadowed by fear and fracture; Cooper turns the frontier into a theater of freedom and dispossession. Poe reveals obsession’s icy flame and the architecture of dread; Hawthorne distills the lingering weight of inherited guilt; Melville launches a vast, oceanic inquiry into authority and defiance; Whitman sings democratic expansiveness while wrestling with contradiction. Lawrence’s portraits are not final verdicts but catalytic encounters, urging readers to sense how each writer’s imaginative stance contends with the American experiment’s promises and pressures.
As a British observer, Lawrence writes both from inside the Western canon and at an angle to American self-understanding. That distance sharpens his vision, allowing him to notice what familiarity might naturalize: the volatility of a society built on new beginnings, the specter of violence behind pastoral confidence, the allure and peril of boundless possibility. Yet his foreignness also exposes limits and invites debate—another reason the book persists. By setting European inheritances beside American improvisations, he frames a conversation about tradition and novelty, conscience and appetite, that continues to illuminate the distinctiveness and the contradictions of the American literary imagination.
One reason the book remains compelling is Lawrence’s prose itself: sinewy, metaphor-rich, and impatient with platitudes. He writes criticism as if it were a high-stakes narrative, moving by intuition as much as by analysis, refusing to separate thought from style. This makes the essays themselves an artistic performance, arguing that form is an argument and that cadence carries knowledge. His pages do not march; they flare and probe. That energy draws readers back to the primary texts with heightened alertness, making old works feel newly dangerous and alive. In this sense, the collection exemplifies criticism as a creative, revitalizing act.
For contemporary readers, the collection’s relevance lies in its fierce attention to the dynamics of identity, freedom, authority, and the human relation to place—issues that remain unsettled. Lawrence asks how a culture narrates itself, what it represses to achieve coherence, and how literature exposes those hidden costs. The essays offer tools for reading beyond declarations toward the energies that bear them along. They speak to ongoing debates about individualism, moral certainty, technological rationality, and the pull of the natural world. By refusing comfortable resolutions, the book equips readers to approach canonical works with curiosity, skepticism, and a readiness to be changed.
Studies in Classic American Literature endures because it confronts the foundational texts of a nation without deference or disdain, seeking the live current that runs through them. It presents a bracing thesis: that beneath official ideals surge elemental forces—desire, fear, will, wonder—that literature reveals and wrestles with. Addressing Franklin through Whitman, Lawrence crafts a mosaic of American spiritual weather, charting conflicts between mind and body, law and liberty, dream and deed. Its lasting appeal resides in its courage, its style, and its invitation to read as an adventure. The result is an introduction and an incitement: approach the classics and feel them burn.
Synopsis
Studies in Classic American Literature is a set of essays in which D. H. Lawrence examines foundational U.S. writers and what their works reveal about the national temperament. Written in the early twentieth century, the book surveys authors from the late eighteenth to the nineteenth century, moving from a general introduction to focused readings. Lawrence outlines recurrent tensions—between wilderness and civilization, freedom and moral restraint, individuality and social belonging—using literary analysis to trace how these tensions surface in plots, characters, and styles. The collection aims to locate a distinct American sensibility, separate from European precedent, through close attention to representative texts.
In the opening essay, often summarized as the spirit of place, Lawrence sets the framework by contrasting Old World rootedness with New World dislocation. He argues that American writing grows from a landscape of vast spaces, frontier encounters, and a deliberate break from inherited forms. This sense of newness, he suggests, shapes tone and theme: a quest for renewal coupled with unease about belonging. The introduction proposes that environment and history are inseparable from literary character, and that the American imagination tests boundaries—geographical, moral, and metaphysical. This premise guides the subsequent chapters, which treat individual authors as variations on these shared conditions.
Turning to Benjamin Franklin, Lawrence examines the self-made ethos articulated in Poor Richard’s sayings and the Autobiography. He presents Franklin’s program of industry, thrift, and planned self-improvement as a formative civic ideal. According to Lawrence, this ethic codifies a practical, utilitarian character for the American citizen, favoring efficiency, sobriety, and measurable success. He reads Franklin as establishing a model of virtue aligned with productivity and social order. The chapter’s key conclusion is that this outlook significantly influenced the culture’s expectations of personal conduct, providing a disciplined template for public life that later writers would question, resist, or complicate.
In discussing J. Hector St. John de Crèvecœur, Lawrence focuses on Letters from an American Farmer and its vision of the rural republic. He highlights the image of the independent farmer as an emblem of openness, hospitality, and equitable opportunity. At the same time, he notes how the text discloses less harmonious realities, including slavery and frontier violence. The essay emphasizes the tension between pastoral promise and historical complexity, suggesting that idealized scenes coexist with disturbing scenes. Lawrence’s overview positions the agrarian myth as a central but contested foundation, one that subsequent literature continuously tests against social and moral contradictions.
Lawrence then analyzes James Fenimore Cooper’s Leatherstocking tales, with Natty Bumppo mediating between wilderness and settlement. He follows Natty’s movement across forests and lakes as an emblem of escape from legal and domestic constraints, paired with respect for native land and codes. The reading identifies a recurrent dilemma: civilization brings order and property, yet it also erodes the conditions that produced the frontier hero. Conflicts among settlers, soldiers, and Indigenous peoples illustrate competing claims on territory and law. Lawrence concludes that Cooper dramatizes the costs of expansion, staging the American desire to go farther even as the wilderness recedes.
On Edgar Allan Poe, Lawrence examines narratives of obsession, craft, and inward fracture, seeing in them a drive toward aesthetic control amid psychological disturbance. Poe’s tales and poems are treated as studies in the pressures beneath a polished surface. Lawrence then turns to Nathaniel Hawthorne, concentrating on Puritan legacies of guilt, secrecy, and judgment in novels such as The Scarlet Letter. He emphasizes how Hawthorne uses symbol and allegory to explore authority, desire, and community. Together these chapters present enclosed, interior worlds in which moral inheritance presses on individual will, exposing tensions that public ideals cannot fully resolve.
The discussion of Herman Melville ranges from early travel narratives to the expansive symbolism of Moby-Dick. Lawrence treats the sea as a space for testing authority, comradeship, and metaphysical inquiry. Ahab’s pursuit is read as will-driven defiance set against vast, impersonal forces, while Ishmael’s perspective offers observation and provisional understanding. The ship’s small society serves as a model for democratic and hierarchical arrangements in conflict. Lawrence emphasizes the strain between human assertion and elemental realities, proposing that Melville’s fiction maps the reach and limits of American aspiration when confronted with magnitude, contingency, and the opacity of nature.
In the essay on Walt Whitman, Lawrence addresses Leaves of Grass as a declaration of democratic fellowship and bodily affirmation. He notices Whitman’s inclusive catalogues, the celebration of common life, and the theme of merging selves in a national chorus. At the same time, he questions how this boundless self accommodates difference and boundary. The chapter’s conclusion is that Whitman remains a central voice for an American ideal of expansive sympathy, while also exposing difficulties in sustaining universal embrace. Through Whitman, Lawrence frames a vision of community that seeks unity without erasing the individual pulse that animates it.
Across the collection, Lawrence’s overarching claim is that classic American literature records a struggle to reconcile freedom with form, release with responsibility, and the new with the inherited. Each author presents a distinct solution or impasse: a civic code, a pastoral promise, a frontier ethic, a metaphysical quest, or a democratic song. Read together, these works chart a national character marked by energy and ambivalence. The book’s purpose is descriptive rather than prescriptive: to identify the patterns shaping the tradition and to show how American writing transforms its circumstances into themes, myths, and structures that still organize its imaginative life.
Historical Context
D. H. Lawrence’s Studies in Classic American Literature, published in New York in 1923 by Thomas Seltzer and in London in 1924 by Martin Secker, emerges from a post–World War I, transatlantic vantage point. Lawrence wrote and revised these essays between 1919 and 1923 while living variously in Sicily, Italy, and visiting the United States and Mexico. The epoch was marked by political reaction, Prohibition (1920–1933), and the First Red Scare (1919–1920) in the United States. Against this climate, Lawrence examined the formative American past—the seventeenth through nineteenth centuries—treating canonical authors as witnesses to the nation’s historical construction in New England towns, Atlantic ports, river valleys, and western frontiers.
The “place” of the book is twofold: the Old World perch of an English exile and the multiple American locales embedded in the works he analyzes. Lawrence’s subjects carry readers to Puritan Boston and Salem, the whaling docks of New Bedford, the Mississippi and Missouri river systems, and Pacific littorals stretching to California. He probes the historical stresses that shaped those spaces: theocratic governance, revolutionary mobilization, Indian dispossession, market expansion, slavery, civil war, and imperial acquisition. Writing in the 1920s amid censorship controversies and moral legislation, Lawrence links these sites and episodes to deep social energies, arguing that American literature records the nation’s struggle between mechanized civic ideals and a darker, untamed vitality.
The Puritan settlement of New England—anchored by the Massachusetts Bay Colony (founded 1630) and the Salem witch trials (1692–1693)—forged a theocratic social order with strict moral codes and communal surveillance. Laws against Sabbath-breaking and sumptuary excess reflected an ethic of discipline and suspicion of the body. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter (1850) revisits mid-seventeenth-century Boston to expose guilt, public penance, and hypocrisy. Lawrence reads this history as a living force in American character: a repressive moral absolutism that American writers resist or internalize. By returning to Puritan spaces and dates, he frames Hawthorne’s dark allegories as historical case studies in the psychic costs of a sanctified polity.
The American Revolution (1775–1783), Declaration of Independence (1776), and the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention (1787) reorganized sovereignty in the former colonies. Benjamin Franklin—printer, postmaster, diplomat, and inventor—embodies the Enlightenment’s civic and commercial ethos in Philadelphia. J. Hector St. John de Crèvecœur’s Letters from an American Farmer (1782) articulated a new agrarian identity across the mid-Atlantic backcountry. Lawrence interprets this founding moment as a double creation: political liberty and a utilitarian morality. His essays on Franklin and Crèvecœur show how republican self-improvement and industriousness can harden into mechanism, masking unresolved contradictions of slavery, dispossession, and the unquiet frontier beneath the rhetoric of virtue.
Westward expansion and Indian Removal constitute a central historical matrix for the literature Lawrence studies. The Louisiana Purchase (1803) doubled U.S. territory and launched federally sponsored exploration, notably the Lewis and Clark Expedition (1804–1806). Settler migration surged along the Ohio and Mississippi valleys, then across the Missouri watershed. The Indian Removal Act (1830), signed by Andrew Jackson, authorized treaties that coerced southeastern nations from ancestral homelands. The Cherokee Trail of Tears (1838–1839) cost thousands of lives during forced marches to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma); the Second Seminole War (1835–1842) extended violent dispossession into Florida. John L. O’Sullivan’s phrase “Manifest Destiny” (1845) provided ideological sanction for continental empire, and the Homestead Act (1862) formalized smallholder settlement on expropriated lands. In literature, James Fenimore Cooper’s Leatherstocking Tales (1823–1841) map an edge-space where Euro-American settlers, Native nations (Mohicans, Delawares), and forests meet in episodes of hunting, treaty, and war. Lawrence seizes upon this borderland to argue that American identity was formed in acts of rupture—severing ties to Europe while displacing Indigenous polities—and in a desire to fuse with the land’s vitality. He reads the frontier as an arena of conflicted attraction and annihilation: the urge to “go native” coexisting with legal and military removal. This dialectic reappears in texts he treats beyond Cooper—in the river and prairie geographies that shape American characters’ mobility—and it undergirds his claims that America’s democratic surface veils a deeper drama of conquest, solitude, and spiritual estrangement. By detailing statutes, dates, and campaigns, Lawrence ties a national mythology of freedom to the history of expansionary state power and the intimate violence of settlement.
The Market Revolution accelerated after 1815: the Erie Canal opened in 1825, linking the Great Lakes to the Hudson River and New York Harbor; the telegraph debuted in 1844; and railroad mileage expanded from roughly 9,000 miles (1850) to over 30,000 miles (1860). Urban populations surged—New York City grew from 123,706 (1820) to 515,547 (1850)—and wage labor spread from textile towns like Lowell, Massachusetts (founded 1822), to printing and shipping hubs. Franklin’s earlier print capitalism and civic associations prefigure this infrastructural modernity, while Walt Whitman’s 1850s Brooklyn journalism and Leaves of Grass (1855) absorb the city’s flux. Lawrence connects this transformation to a mechanical ethos that threatens the body’s spontaneity.
Atlantic and Pacific maritime economies framed the careers of Richard Henry Dana Jr. and Herman Melville. Dana shipped from Boston to Alta California (then Mexican) in 1834–1836 on the Pilgrim, describing hide-loading at San Diego, San Pedro, Santa Barbara, and Monterey in Two Years Before the Mast (1840). Melville sailed on the Acushnet (1841) from New Bedford, deserting in the Marquesas (1842), before writing Typee (1846) and Moby-Dick (1851). U.S. whaling, centered in Nantucket and New Bedford, peaked between the 1840s and early 1860s, ranging across the Pacific. Lawrence treats the ship, the fo’c’sle, and the oceanic chase as historical theaters where American ambition meets global trade, labor discipline, and sublime risk.
The expansion of plantation slavery after the cotton gin (1793), the Missouri Compromise (1820), and the domestic slave trade set the stage for the Compromise of 1850 and the Fugitive Slave Act (1850), which nationalized slave-catching. Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852) sold hundreds of thousands of copies in its first year, catalyzing antislavery sentiment. Court decisions such as Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) entrenched slavery’s legal architecture. Lawrence’s reflections on Stowe and on Melville’s darker tales situate the literature within this crisis: American texts register both sentimental protest and a brooding awareness of domination, revolt, and the moral evasions that sustained a slaveholding republic.
The Mexican–American War (1846–1848), waged under President James K. Polk, ended with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848), transferring California, New Mexico, and vast tracts of the Southwest to the United States. Gold discovered at Sutter’s Mill on January 24, 1848, ignited the California Gold Rush, swelling San Francisco from roughly 1,000 inhabitants (1848) to about 25,000 (1850). Dana’s prewar California sketches become, in Lawrence’s reading, a baseline to measure America’s abrupt imperial pivot from Atlantic to Pacific. The book treats the Pacific coast not as a distant edge but as a decisive annexation zone where commerce, labor coercion, and settlement recast national scale and destiny.
Jacksonian Democracy (1829–1837) expanded white male suffrage, institutionalized the spoils system, and waged the Bank War (1832–1834) against the Second Bank of the United States. Popular campaigning and mass party organization redefined political participation, while federal Indian policy intensified removal. Whitman, a newspaperman in the 1840s, absorbed the idiom of the street and the stump; Cooper registered ambivalence toward egalitarian tumult and majority will. Lawrence reads the rhetoric of the people through these figures, seeing a democratic élan that liberates energy yet courts demagoguery, materialism, and the erasure of distinct, embodied life in the name of a leveling civic creed.
The Second Great Awakening (c. 1790–1840) reshaped public morality and social reform. Camp meetings at Cane Ridge, Kentucky (1801), and Charles Grandison Finney’s revivals in the “Burned-Over District” (Rochester, 1830–1831) spurred temperance (American Temperance Society, 1826), abolition, and communal experiments such as the Shakers, Oneida (1848), and Brook Farm (1841–1847). The Seneca Falls Convention (1848) articulated women’s rights within this ferment. Stowe’s evangelical antislavery and Hawthorne’s skepticism toward reformist perfectionism stand in this context. Lawrence traces how revivalist moral assurance becomes coercive power, and how literature registers both the hope of ethical transformation and the dread of sanctified social control.
The Civil War (1861–1865) wrought more than 600,000 military deaths and redefined federal authority and citizenship. The Emancipation Proclamation (January 1, 1863) declared freedom in rebelling territories; pivotal battles—Antietam (1862), Gettysburg (1863), Atlanta (1864)—and total-war logistics transformed the nation-state. Walt Whitman served as a volunteer nurse in Washington, D.C., hospitals (1862–1865), publishing Drum-Taps (1865), a poetic record of suffering, comradeship, and national rupture. Lawrence sees in Whitman’s witness an attempt to heal a torn body politic by affirming physical presence and democratic affection, even as the war’s scale exposed the cost of earlier compromises over slavery and union.
Reconstruction (1865–1877) introduced constitutional amendments—Thirteenth (1865), Fourteenth (1868), Fifteenth (1870)—and federal occupation, yet faced Black Codes (1865–1866), Ku Klux Klan terror (founded 1865), and a political retreat culminating in the Compromise of 1877. Jim Crow segregation hardened in the late nineteenth century, sanctioned in part by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). Lawrence, writing in 1923, reads antebellum and Civil War texts with the knowledge that emancipation yielded to new regimes of racial control. His commentary on Stowe and on national mythmaking highlights how sentimental or heroic narratives obscure the persistence of domination after legal slavery.
Prohibition began with the Eighteenth Amendment (ratified 1919) and the Volstead Act (effective 1920), coinciding with the First Red Scare’s Palmer Raids (1919–1920) and a broader censorship culture. In 1923, New York’s Society for the Suppression of Vice, led by John S. Sumner, targeted publishers including Lawrence’s own American publisher, Thomas Seltzer, in obscenity prosecutions and raids. Lawrence’s essays thus appeared amid campaigns to police morality and radical speech. He reads classic American texts as antecedents to this climate: a nation committed to freedom yet repeatedly enforcing conformity, surveilling desire, and equating civic order with the suppression of unruly bodies and voices.
Lawrence’s 1922–1923 sojourn in the American Southwest, facilitated by Mabel Dodge Luhan in Taos, New Mexico, brought him into proximity with Pueblo communities. This occurred during federal assimilationist policies: the Dawes Act (1887) and off-reservation boarding schools such as Carlisle (founded 1879), alongside Bureau of Indian Affairs restrictions on ceremonial life (tightened by circulars in the 1920s). These encounters sharpened Lawrence’s sense of an America built on Indigenous dispossession yet haunted by Indigenous presence. His essays on frontier literature reflect this tension, reading settler narratives against ongoing state management of Native cultures and the persistent desire to access an alternate, land-rooted order.
As a social critique, the book insists that American self-congratulation—whether Franklin’s civic prudence or Jacksonian appeals to the people—rests upon acts of erasure: of Indigenous sovereignty, of enslaved labor’s centrality, and of the body’s claims. By re-situating Hawthorne’s Puritan Boston or Melville’s New England wharves within concrete histories of theocracy, commerce, and conquest, Lawrence exposes how moral rhetoric cloaks domination. He insists that the national project’s mechanical virtues—efficiency, rectitude, industriousness—can become instruments for disciplining desire and difference, producing a citizen who is socially compliant yet internally estranged.
Politically, the collection reads nineteenth-century texts through the 1920s lens of surveillance and prohibition, revealing continuities between Puritan blue laws and modern legal moralism. It indicts class complacency in market cities and maritime capitals that profited from slavery, whaling, and expansion. The essays urge recognition of the frontier’s violence rather than its mythic innocence, and they honor Whitman’s democratic tenderness as a counter to bureaucratic abstraction. In showing how national myths legitimize inequality—from removal to Jim Crow—the book performs an historical unmasking, asking the republic to reckon with the embodied, plural life it has policed in the name of order.
Author Biography
D. H. Lawrence (1885–1930) was an English novelist, poet, short-story writer, and essayist whose work probed the pressures of modernity on intimate life and the natural world. Associated with literary modernism yet resistant to schools and orthodoxies, he wrote across forms with unusual intensity, courting controversy for his candid treatment of sexuality, class, and spiritual yearning. From early novels about industrial communities to late polemical essays, he sought a vital language for feeling and embodiment. His international travels broadened his settings and subjects, while censorship battles sharpened public debate about literary freedom. Today he stands as a major twentieth‑century voice of psychological and social critique.
Raised in a coal-mining district of Nottinghamshire, Lawrence absorbed firsthand the tensions between labor, education, and aspiration that would shape his fiction. He trained as a teacher at University College Nottingham and worked as a schoolteacher before turning fully to writing. Early encouragement from readers and editors in London helped him place poems and stories and secure a publisher for his first novel. He admired Romantic poets and read contemporary philosophy and psychology, drawing on ideas about instinct, vitality, and the unconscious. Although often labeled a modernist, he cultivated an independent path, skeptical of mechanized society and the narrowing effects of industrial rationalism.
Lawrence’s debut novel, The White Peacock, announced a new voice attentive to landscape and desire, but it was Sons and Lovers that established his reputation. Drawing on working-class experience and the pull between home and personal ambition, that book was praised for psychological depth and plainspoken realism, though some critics resisted its intensity. He also wrote striking stories—such as Odour of Chrysanthemums—and early poetry that experimented with free rhythms and observation. By the early 1910s he had become a recognizable figure in English letters, developing themes of class mobility, emotional conflict, and the costs of industrial life that he would rework throughout his career.
In the mid-1910s he produced The Rainbow, a novel tracing generational change and erotic self-discovery among provincial families. Its frankness led to legal suppression in Britain, a setback that intensified his quarrel with prevailing moral codes. He continued the project in Women in Love, completed during the war years and published after the conflict, which deepened his exploration of power, intimacy, and social upheaval. Official scrutiny and censorship marked this period, and his distrust of nationalist fervor hardened. Soon after the war he began extended travels, seeking climates and communities where he could write with fewer constraints and broaden his imaginative range.
The 1920s were remarkably productive. Lawrence wrote and revised fiction while moving through Italy, the Mediterranean, and beyond, and he published travel books that turned movement itself into a mode of inquiry, including Twilight in Italy, Sea and Sardinia, Mornings in Mexico, and, later, Etruscan Places. His poetry matured in volumes such as Look! We Have Come Through! and Birds, Beasts and Flowers, notable for their immediacy and non-metaphorical attention to living things. He continued to craft taut novellas and tales—among them The Fox, The Captain’s Doll, and The Rocking-Horse Winner—and staged dramas that examined domestic strain and social expectation.
His essays articulated a provocative philosophy of feeling and form. Studies in Classic American Literature offered fierce readings of Hawthorne, Melville, and others, while Psychoanalysis and the Unconscious and Fantasia of the Unconscious critiqued mechanistic accounts of mind, arguing for a layered, bodily intelligence. Lady Chatterley’s Lover, first issued privately on the continent in the late 1920s, fused these concerns in a narrative about desire, class, and the possibility of renewal; it met bans and expurgation, and an unexpurgated edition became the focus of a landmark British obscenity trial decades later. Throughout, he pursued a style that joined candor with visionary intensity.
Lawrence’s health declined from tuberculosis in his later years, though he continued to write travel sketches, poems, and essays, including the posthumously published Apocalypse. He spent time in Italy and the south of France and died in 1930 in France. After his death, his critical stature grew as censorship eased and scholars reassessed his range. He is now read as a central figure negotiating modernity’s fractures: industrial alienation, ecological disquiet, gender and power, and the search for an embodied ethics. His work remains a touchstone in classrooms and public debate, shaping conversations about artistic freedom, sexuality in literature, and the modern novel.
Studies in Classic American Literature
Chapter 1 The Spirit of Place
WE like to think of the old-fashioned American classics as children's books. Just childishness, on our part. The old American art-speech contains an alien quality, which belongs to the American continent and to nowhere else. But, of course, so long as we insist on reading the books as children's tales, we miss all that.
One wonders what the proper high-brow Romans of the third and fourth or later centuries read into the strange utterances of Lucretius or Apuleius or Tertullian, Augustine or Athanasius. The uncanny voice of Iberian Spain, the weirdness of old Carthage, the passion of Libya and North Africa; you may bet the proper old Romans never heard these at all. They read old Latin inference over the top of it, as we read old European inference over the top of Poe or Hawthorne.
It is hard to hear a new voice, as hard as it is to listen to an unknown language. We just don't listen. There is a new voice in the old American classics[1q]. The world has declined to hear it, and has babbled about children's stories.
Why? — Out of fear. The world fears a new experience more than it fears anything. Because a new experience displaces so many old experiences. And it is like trying to use muscles that have perhaps never been used, or that have been going stiff for ages. It hurts horribly.
The world doesn't fear a new idea. It can pigeon-hole any idea. But it can't pigeon-hole a real new experience. It can only dodge. The world is a great dodger, and the Americans the greatest. Because they dodge their own very selves.
There is a new feeling in the old American books, far more than there is in the modern American books, which are pretty empty of any feeling, and proud of it. There is a 'different' feeling in the old American classics. It is the shifting over from the old psyche to something new, a displacement. And displacements hurt. This hurts. So we try to tie it up, like a cut finger. Put a rag round it.
It is a cut too. Cutting away the old emotions and consciousness. Don't ask what is left.
Art-speech is the only truth. An artist is usually a damned liar, but his art, if it be art, will tell you the truth of his day. And that is all that matters. Away with eternal truth. Truth lives from day to day, and the marvellous Plato of yesterday is chiefly bosh today.
The old American artists were hopeless liars. But they were artists, in spite of themselves. Which is more than you can say of most living practitioners.
And you can please yourself, when you read The Scarlet Letter, whether you accept what that sugary, blue-eyed little darling of a Hawthorne has to say for himself, false as all darlings are, or whether you read the impeccable truth of his art-speech.
The curious thing about art-speech is that it prevaricates so terribly, I mean it tells such lies. I suppose because we always all the time tell ourselves lies. And out of a pattern of lies art weaves the truth. Like Dostoevsky posing as a sort of Jesus, but most truthfully revealing himself all the while as a little horror.
